IN the round-ball game, they call it getting one back - a quick reply to a goal scored by your opponent.

They do need to take a hard look at themselves. Jon Kudelka in The Australian.

For Tony Abbott, a conservative true believer as passionate as any football fan, his chance is rapidly approaching.

Kevin Rudd is labouring under the weight of some disastrous polling and a needlessly messy fight with the country’s miners.

Viewed across the whole term, an Abbott win would come against the run of play, but then, politics like football, is a funny game.

Still, the talk of an election in August or perhaps early September persists even though it would seem crazy with the polls as they are.

For whatever reason, there is a palpable sense in Canberra that parliamentary sittings over the next two weeks will be the last this term.

While MPs are due to return in late August after the winter break, government insiders doubt it will happen. “I can’t see us coming back before the election,’’ one said.

It would be wrong however to mistake this sentiment for confidence. Rather, there is a sense of fatalism on the Labor side - not so much of impending defeat, but of what will be will be.

Government members undoubtedly are shell-shocked by their precipitate fall from public favour but they are out of answers having already fired all their big guns on hospital reforms, education and training, the federal Budget and most spectacularly, on tax. The only game-changer left in the play-book is the election itself. And some now feel there is little to be gained by waiting especially because, as the good jobs figures showed on Thursday, (WA’s jobless rate is just 4.1 per cent) the economy is now straining at the bit, increasing the likelihood of another interest rate rise in coming months.

Perhaps Kevin Rudd was on to something when he said recently that a year working for him is like working seven elsewhere. Such are the relentless demands that the whole government is already showing signs of third or fourth term fatigue.

It is difficult to say what Rudd himself thinks about election timing but you would imagine at least that he has a plan.

If so, what is it? If it involved arresting a dangerous drift in the mining tax debate, he has done the opposite by again predicting negotiations could run on for months. If it was meant as a joke, nobody is laughing.

It fell to Simon Crean this week to act where the PM could not bring himself to by admitting the consultation phase had been bungled. One of just two Cabinet ministers in Rudd’s team to have been a minister before, Crean’s motives have been mis-interpreted as cracks in Cabinet unity. But that misses the point. Rather, Crean’s comments were crafted to draw a line under the process to date so as to facilitate a new process from here. By legitimising the miners’ complaints to have been left out of the information loop until the last minute, he has effectively also removed that complaint as an impediment to what happens now. And it is what happens now that is important, not who told what to whom and when.

Pointlessly, the Government had allowed itself to be dragged into the argument over the consultation process, and was being hit over the head daily with it. Crean, unlike Rudd and Swan, concluded it was not helping an already deeply flawed process.

Like the strategically silly shelving of the ETS and numerous less important announcements, the mining tax’s unveiling was too clever by half - a symptom of a government that is run by advisers and former advisers. This matters because ultimately, the tax’s botched presentation has weakened the Government’s bargaining hand.

It is the triumph of cleverness over strategy and is the kind of thing that can happen when you become obsessed with winning the battle of the daily media cycle while forgetting about the war.

There are signs that cooler heads in the resources sector are also realising that outright refusal to yield could backfire. Distinguishing themselves from ridiculous references to communists and the like, more sober types such as BHP’s Marius Kloppers are treading a bit more gingerly.

“We need to always scrupulously stick to playing the issue and not the man,’’ Kloppers told one newspaper.

This is wise given that the most likely outcome of this year’s election remains the return of the current government - albeit with a reduced majority and a big grudge. The Greens would likely hold the balance of power in the Senate too and they can hardly be described as pro-mining.

Labor MPs hope that a compromise on the tax is done soon taking it off the front pages. That combined with the welcome morale boost and diversion of Australia doing well at the World Cup, could be just the thing to prompt a visit to the Governor General five or six weeks from now.

72 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Against the Man says:

      06:54am | 12/06/10

      Here is how Rudd scored a own goal:
      1) Dumping the ETS (Showed us he was only passionate when it involved impressing his friends in the UN)
      2) Insulation project (Dead Australian civilians, geez talk about badly implemented policy)
      3) Asylum seeker issue (Is there a reasonable Labor policy in play that is both humanitarian and cost effective to the tax payer? Might require too much mental energy to solve that one)
      4) Health care ( A bloated policy that still doesn’t involve the Federal government taking over 100%)
      5) Temper, temper (Anger is a way of coping with stress, stress comes about when you have no ability or don’t have the ability to do your job competently and comfortably)
      6) The mining tax (A good idea to help Australia or an easy way to get cash to cover up spending mistakes)
      7) Dignity (Poping up on the sunrise show, rove, strip clubs and getting policy advise from Cate Blanchett is not the way a decent PM show be conducting himself)
      8) 2020 summit (What was that all about?)
      9) Lies (Fiscal conservative? No tax payer monies for political ads?)
      10) Using the term ‘working families’ (When was the last time this millionaire had to struggle to pay the bills, do a decent job or suffer under his own silly policies?)

      Oh well ..........

    • Evan Findlay says:

      04:00pm | 12/06/10

      Against the Man,

      How is it that when Mr Rudd stated, on many occasions, that with the current numbers in the senate and the obstructionist ploys by the Liberal party, that it is a complete waste of the senate’s time reintroducing the bills. It’s only going to get knocked back. Abbott has continually assured us it will. But this common sense approach is seen by those of a simplier intellectual level as a sign that it has been dumped, it hasn’t. 

      Abbott continually makes reference’s to Workchoices in that it wont be reintroduced but his preferred policy constitutes the majority of the failed Workchoices legislation.

      And what other economic blunders should we expect from Mr Abbott. Maybe he could offer stay at home mums $50,000 in order to buy their votes. Why doesn’t he pay 100% rebates for private health, that way everyone could get on board. He could simply strip all funding from the public health system to pay for it, he’s good at stripping money out of the public system!

      I would really love to dissect the Liberal party policies but it’s hard when they have none. Maybe we should just vote for the Mining council because a vote for the Liberal party is a vote for large corporations, that way we can forgo penalty rates, ignore infrastructure, return to Workchoices and trash the economy.  But I can’t see the mining council recklessly throwing money at baby bonuses, cash splashes and middleclass welfare like the Liberal party does. So maybe it is time to vote for the Greens. Let’s see Tony get legislation passed through the senate when they hold the balance of power. A taste of his own medicine.

    • Jason says:

      11:22pm | 12/06/10

      If your going to blamr the deaths on Rudd, which is bull, you better start blaming Aussie digger deaths on Howard as he is more culpable towards them.

    • Tim says:

      07:34am | 13/06/10

      11) BER ripoff. Schools charged 3 or 4 times market rates for school buildings.
      12) The internet filter (the worst of the lot IMHO)

    • Steve says:

      07:42am | 12/06/10

      Abbott’s devastating - liar liar liar pants on fire attack on Rudd is wearing a little thin. A bit more substance please Tony.

    • u kant handle tha truth says:

      09:19am | 12/06/10

      So are the lies,lies,lies, a little more truth Kevin,any substance is better than nil

    • Jack Thomas says:

      03:38pm | 12/06/10

      The hypocrisy of Labor’s “thought bubble” message is laughable.

      All the senior Labor Ministers were briefed a while ago to roll out the “Tony Abbott has no policies, just thought bubbles” line. Now their lackeys and latte socialist mates are waffling on with it.

      Let’s look at the Labor ‘substance’ of policy shall we?

      “Sorry” - well done you said it, made all you feel so much better. Now what?

      “2020” - policy think tank ey? Not one taken up. Nuff said.

      “MP behavioural standards” - Belinda Neal, Fitzgibbon, etc. Blah blah blah.

      As for policies, I think we’d all rather Kevin hadn’t rush his out because they have been a debacle. From Grocery Watch to the A Computer for every School Kid, from the Greatest Moral Issue of Our Time to the Mining Super Tax.

      What policies did Rudd have before election? Apart from “me too” and “I’m and economic conservative” Labor didn;t announce one more than a month before.

      The desperate whining from the Latte Left as Rudd sinks like a stone…

    • RIP ETS says:

      09:11am | 12/06/10

      What is Penny Wong doing these days?

    • acker says:

      10:03am | 12/06/10

      Bob Hawke was a master at converting high intelligent thought into simple basic English..it wouldn’t surprise me if Greg Hunt and Ian MacFarlane get a major environmental bill passed if the Libs win, Wong & Rudd were hopeless selling the ETS

    • RJB says:

      01:12pm | 12/06/10

      She contributes to blog sites under the non de plume of Peresphone.

    • acker says:

      03:39pm | 12/06/10

      @RJB ..nasty nasty ..Penny has not sold the ETS very well, but I doubt even she has the one way blinkers that the person you mentioned has.

    • Evan Findlay says:

      04:03pm | 12/06/10

      Acker,Hunt and McFarlane would get anything passed if the Greens hold the balance of power. But doing nothing would suit Abbott.

    • Philip Crowley says:

      05:14pm | 12/06/10

      Oh, RJB, that is gold grin

    • Janine says:

      08:36pm | 12/06/10

      A fate worse than Kevin Rudd would be Julia Gillard. And worse again, would be Greens controlling the Senate.  Brown’s Greens have effectively shut down Tasmania.
      I thought Rudd and Swan’s droning working families (their favoured group - no-one else of any worth exists for them,  like couples, retirees, singles and dinks)  were making me feel ill, but I feel sicker each time we’re force-fed Gillard’s education revolution.
      Facial expressions are worth a thousand words. When the questions get too hard for her, Gillar’s eyes narrow.  Gillard’s eyes will soon be permanently closed.

    • Christian Real says:

      09:13am | 12/06/10

      Against the Man
      What typical liberal diatribe, Kevin Rudd did not cause those roofing insultation employees to be killed, and to falsely and blatantly claim this against the law; it is called ‘Defamation of character’, and also since you have written this accusation in your diatribe it is called Libel.

      Fact: those companies that employed those employees that died are soley responsible for the Workplace, Health and Safety of their employees.

      Those companies that employed those employees that died installing roofing insulation are responsible for training their employess, which was something that these companies failed to do

      Those companies that employed those insulation employees that died are soley responsible for providing a safe working place and enviroment for their employees - another thing that those companies failed to do.

      The Prime Minister did not ‘dump’ the ETS, he has shelved it for the time being, another false liberal misrepresentation of the facts.

      The mining Tax, even Clive Palmer has since admitted that he exaggerated the possible consequences.

      Anger Management; If you are refering to the alledged incidence with a RAAF Flight Attendant, that was another phoney smear campaign from the Liberal Opposition.

      In a NewsMail story   ‘PM’s air crew ‘stressed out’ : Senator,”  in The Sydney Morning Herald story; “Senator alleges PM of abuse of air crew.”

      In both of these papers and these online stories,  “Senator Brandis asked RAAF chief Air Marshal Mark Binskin whether the alledged outburst over the lack of a special meal really occurred.”

      “I put it to you that an incident of the kind…did in fact take place, he said”

      “Air Marshal Binskin responded: “An incident of the severity you describe has never been reported to me.”

      In another part of this story Senator Brandis also made these allegations:

      “Last week he alledged Mr Rudd was yelling so uncontrollably at a group of newspaper editors at a dinner that his security officers burst into the private dining room to see if he was under threat.”

      “Neither incident has been confirmed.”

      It would be correct in saying that if Senator George Brandis was telling the truth, the newspaper editors that were present at this dinner in this private dining room would have not hesitated in publishing stories in their newspapers had the incident occurred.

      Also, it would seem strange that the Prime Minister’s security guards were not already present in the dining room, and that also makes Senator Brandis claims false and misleading.

      It would be right in saying that Senator George Brandis, is embarking on orchestrating the biggest dirty, scare mongering campaigns ever, against the current Prime Minister.

      Senator George Brandis accusations are unfounded,and he should step down from his his position of being a paid representative of the Australian people.

      Before you attack Rudd on the use of taxpayers money for political advertisements, surf the net and you will find that your ex Liberal Prime Minister spent much more of taxpayers funding advertisements on the
      GST, as well as advertisements on WorkChoices.

      I agree with Steve’s comment, that the ‘attack on Rudd is wearing a little thin’

    • Joan says:

      09:59am | 12/06/10

      ‘attack on Rudd is wearing a little thin’ ?? Really ? Attacks are a coming thick and fast and not just from the journos or Libs but the voters who now see Rudd for what he is, his track record speaks for itself and voters can see the metal the man is made of - talks tough with no real substantial outcome, follow through. Tanties and tears are not the reasons why people vote out leaders but broken promises, lack of trust and weakness are.

    • Brendan says:

      10:15am | 12/06/10

      Christian,
      Lets look at the common thread running through ALL the “own goals” Rudd has scored. This is a government that has set itself up to act on “advice” from experts. Yet in all these programs they have tried to use the experts recommendations to set up the political master stroke “the election winning plan”. The truth of the green loans (from the author of the recommendation to govt) for example is that they insisted on turning a recommended 3 year program into one over 9 months! The result was instead of retraining building related workers to carry out audits there was an influx of unskilled unemployed trained to carry out the reports in 1/3 the time! The result disaster! The green loan reports were to lead into insulation and other rebates in a structured ways. Again against advice they introduced a grand scheme for political gain. Without consultation with industry one of two out comes was bound to happen, either the supply would not keep up and people wanting insulation would miss out (remember the gatekeeping mechanism of green reports was removed) or the industry would be flooded with fly-by-night operators. Many in the building industry saw this the day the policy was announced!
      To health - the game was the same - take advice, ignore half, announce some grand plan for poitical heroics then coerce and bribe the participants. Follow that up with some feel good public advertising and the job is done right - well re-election is guaranteed!
      To tax reform - mmmm what to do - take advice, ignore 500 odd recommendations, select a politically devisive one so that you can be the political hero, bash or coerce the participants then a spot of feel good advertising….seeing the pattern???
      Good governance requires setting a goal, seeking advice about acheiving the goal, involving participants (including voters) in the debate, then finding the “third solution”. This government has consistently failed to follow this patter, just a the Howard government did with Workchoices. See the pattern?

    • Luke says:

      10:51am | 12/06/10

      The Government has a responsibility to act on recomendations and warnings given to them about the likelyhood of deaths occuring if they did not stop the rushed roll out of the insulation program. They ignored this, and lone behold there were 4 deaths. Don’t try and defend the Government on this.

    • Rob r Charteris says:

      11:51am | 12/06/10

      Senator Bandis is a cheap shot type of pollie, just look at him get his knickers in a knot every time he gets stiff upper lip along with the stiff neck on TV. There is no bigger greater than thou elitist amoung the liberal party. I emailed him once to pull him up on a couple of things he was pushing, no surprise I didn’t get an answer.

    • Steve says:

      01:35pm | 12/06/10

      In defence of Senator George Brandis, he did call the last Liberal Prime Minister a “Lying Rodent” but then went on to deny it.
      Interesting to contrast the Last Liberal PMs career highlights: Promoted the Cronulla race riots, invaded a foreign country, lied about children overboard and had no mandate to introduce draconian work place laws etc.
      Abbott will be worse.

    • Engo says:

      02:06pm | 12/06/10

      @Christian Real

      Actually, it’s possible that Kevin Rudd IS partly reponsible for the death of those workers. You need to understand how a WorkCover investigation works (or equivalent, depending on the state). The investigation starts at the bottom, and makes it’s way up. It investigates the workers actions, then the supervisors actions, then managements actions, potentially all the way to the CEO. It only concludes when the all parties have either demonstrated that they have done everything within their power to minismise the risk of any incidents, or are charged.

      So yes, the installation company is at fault. But an investigation would not stop there, as the federal government played a part in the scheme. The fact is that there was a risk assessment done for the federal government, and it is becoming clear that the prime minister himself ignored safety warning. The motivation? To get it out ASAP, to protect the economy. How would this stand up in an investigation? Very poorly. Is this a valid reason the risk the lives of Australian citizens, and peoples homes? No.

      I voted for Kevin Rudd at the last election. Over and above every other mistake and backflip, this is the one thing that I will not tolerate, and has lost my vote for good.

      Whether or not Kevin Rudd is criminally responsible for the deaths of those workers, how do you feel about a man who would knowingly put lives at risk in the workplace? His position is untenable.

    • Andrew says:

      02:12pm | 12/06/10

      CR says “Before you attack Rudd on the use of taxpayers money for political advertisements, surf the net and you will find that your ex Liberal Prime Minister spent much more of taxpayers funding advertisements on the
      GST, as well as advertisements on WorkChoices.”

      Ummm, I think you will find Howard didn’t sell himself to gain popularity and election by promising to cut tax payer advertising and then be as slimy as to change his own guide lines and over ride his own promise on that. Rudd spent a hell of alot of time degrading Howard and stood on his podium day in day out ridiculing Howard for his tax payer advertising spending and promised he wouldn’t do that if he won Government and would change the guidelines, which he did. And then broke his promise. There is alot of selective memory going on in your little piece above CR. I could go on about alot of other points you mention, but can’t be bothered.

    • Alana says:

      02:18pm | 12/06/10

      Christian GET Real and Steve - were the constant attacks on Nelson, Turnbull and the Libs for 2 and a half years wearing a bit thin for you as well? All the smurking, laughing, jokes and media attacks went on for YEARS. Sorry your Kevin has had a couple of months of attack. Poor Kev.

    • Ben81 says:

      02:23pm | 12/06/10

      Christian, you’re trying way too hard.  Character defamation and libel, good one.

      Rudd created a free for all where any cowboy can pocket $1600 for stapling reflective foil in peoples roof, dropped his doomsday rhetoric on climate change and the ETS that he had before the election, has shown many many times that there’s the public Rudd and there’s also a very different private Rudd, and backed down on his promises about government advertising, which you know very well is the problem here, not just the particular ads.

      Kevin Rudd, before the election - “In terms of establishing the office of the auditor-general with clear-cut guidelines to whom every television campaign is submitted for approval before that television campaign is implemented, you have my absolute, 100 per cent guarantee that that will occur.
      One hundred per cent guarantee and each one of you here can hold me accountable for that.”

      Pretty clear what the problem is here isn’t it Christian.  If you think criticism of this is “wearing a little thin”, and just “liberal diatribe” that’s your problem.

    • Brad Price says:

      03:20pm | 12/06/10

      Before you quote libel laws you probably should have a sound understanding of the application of those laws.

      The common thread throughout your “socialist reply of rhetoric” is one of presenting untruthes as some how facts….. Wake up sunshine.

    • Ben81 says:

      03:40pm | 12/06/10

      Rob r Charteris, if your email was anywhere near as indecipherable as what you’re writing here it’s not surprising you didn’t get an answer.

    • acker says:

      03:44pm | 12/06/10

      Senator George Brandis is an opposition Senator who would often struggle for media attention..Kevin Rudd is the Prime Minister who has the media at his feet ..but is stuffing it up…big time often bog time..

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      03:51pm | 12/06/10

      Hopefully the Liberals will win the next election and all the Liberal supporters can stop frothing at the mouth at the Liberals being out of power. Besides, I want laugh at the Liberals feeble attempts to solve Australia’s very serious problems. As long at the Greens hold the bop in the Senate, the Liberals won’t be able to stuff things up too badly…

    • Christian Real says:

      06:11pm | 12/06/10

      It is said that the truth hurts, and the way these rational Liberals , like Joan, Alana, Ben81 and Coxie are responding it must be right.
      * Alana, poor Turnbull, It doesn’t seem that long ago when Malcolm Turnbull, Senator Eric Abetz and Godwin Grech appeared to have conspired together and orchestrated phoney, misleading allegations against the Prime Minister, in what became known as the Utegate Affair.
      * Opposition Leader Tony Abbott caught out lying on National Television (ABC 7.30 Report)
      * Senator George Brandis, caught out orchestrating a smear campaign against the Prime Minister, with his false allegations about abuse to a RAAF Flight Attendant .
      * Deputy Opposition Leader Julie Bishop’s breach of National security over the fake passports affair.
      * Brendan Nelson, had to apologise to Parliament in March 1997 when it was found that 11 parts of a speech he had given matched a paper on overseas doctors by immigration expert Dr Bob Birrell of Monash University published the previous year.

    • Robert Smissen , rural SA says:

      12:14am | 13/06/10

      Chum, by being such a chump when he passed this shoddy law Little Kevvy IS responsible for the deaths. There is no alledged verbal asualt on the stewardess, he even excused himself, so Christian, get real! !

    • Adam Diver says:

      08:50am | 13/06/10

      I love the fact that Rudd is not responsible, but the companies are. If you just said the employees were at fault you would have a case but by blaming the employers you can blame anyone along the chain as being equally culpable.

      Consumers- Don’t get free insulation
      Employees - Don’t staple through wires
      Employers - Supervise and train the employees
      Regulators - Ensure the employees are properly trained and accredited and that employers are following OHS etc
      Fed Government - Dont throw billions of dollars at an industry that cannot sustain the growth required to meet such demand, and has a distict inability to properly train extra staff in shorts amount of time, whilst not increasing or ensuring that regulators were properly resourced to ensure safe practices are still being followed.

      With that knowledge Christian I think it is more than fair to blame the federal government.

      Before Stimulus package: Insulation = fine
      After stimulus Package: Insulation = bad.

      We should of built some real infrastructure projects in this country with that money. What a wasted opportunity and a waste of money.

    • Ben81 says:

      02:44pm | 13/06/10

      Christian Real, since you avoided it i’ll post it again.

      Kevin Rudd - “In terms of establishing the office of the auditor-general with clear-cut guidelines to whom every television campaign is submitted for approval before that television campaign is implemented, you have my absolute, 100 per cent guarantee that that will occur.
      One hundred per cent guarantee and each one of you here can hold me accountable for that.”

      Perhaps you can point out to me why your reply to this would be “the truth hurts”.

    • Christian Real says:

      03:07pm | 13/06/10

      Robert Smissen Rural SA
      Robert, This is an extract from a story “PM’s air crew ‘stressed out’: Senator”, and it appeared in the NewsMail(Bundabergs local newspaper on 01 June, 2010 (The same story, different headlines, appeared in the Sydney Morning Herald( Senator alleges PM of abuse of air crew) on May 31, 2010 @ 11.19PM) and also in other online newspapers as well.

      “Senator Brandis asked RAAF chief Air Marshal Mark Binskin whether the alleged outburst over the lack of a special meal really occurred”
      “I put it to you that an incident of the kind…did in fact take place”
      “Air Marshal Binskin responded: “an incident of the severity you describe has never been reported to me.”

      Unlike you Robert and other Liberals on these blogs that are affected by tunnel vision and narrow mindedness, I peruse most of the online newspapers on a daily basis.

    • Robert Smissen , rural SA says:

      11:18pm | 13/06/10

      Chris baby, The air marshall mightn’t of heard about it but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen

    • coxie says:

      09:37am | 12/06/10

      Get real, Christian.

    • andrew says:

      11:47pm | 13/06/10

      To everyone who says on these blogs, I voted for so and so last election but never again…..stop bullshitting. Its partisan attacks and thats it, you wont change anything on here you clowns, only partisans read this, the rest of Australia wont care till they have to.

    • Luke says:

      10:12am | 12/06/10

      Rudd should call an early election…
      If all these things drag on his own party might turn against him…
      Or Tony will just have more time to get more support…
      Next question time is going to be key on deciding this…

    • Holly says:

      10:59am | 12/06/10

      In the scheme of things the negotiations on such an important change are not taking a long time. Certainly the ground work was laid in the lead up to the Henry Review and the Minerals Council itself seemed in favour in principle of such a tax . Not long ago we would all have been blissfully unaware of discussions taking place except for maybe the odd news report that discussions were continuing. With modern technology we get a blow by blow minute by minute account.  Private asides in conversations and smart arsed tweets are reported as headline news.  The public, increasingly used to instant gratification, want everything resolved now.  I wonder how many of your readers have actually been directly involved in any sort of negotiation process.  There is no short term fix - it can be very hard going.  Both sides have shown their willingness to negotiate so let them get on with it.

      I am disappointed that the media and the opposition in this country have shown no initiative in pursuing those “business” people who have rorted the government’s stimulus spending.  By ignoring this element and continously going for the easy target,  i.e. the government, you are thereby seen to be condoning the theft of government money.  This is a very bad message to be sending out to the community.  Why do you condone rorting and why have you not put an equal effort into pursuing these criminals?  They are the people I want to see punished, not the Rudd government.

      To all those who claim Rudd has done nothing for this country off the top of my head I can think of the following: -

      vastly Increased hospital funding
      introduced health reforms
      abolished workchoices
      increased pensions
      benefited families by raising Child Care rebate to 50% and introducing tax refunds for some educational expenses
      provided for free dental checks for teenagers
      developed fully funded parental leave scheme
      introduced national curriculum in schools
      upgraded school infrastructure (most of us are happy)
      Major tax cuts for those on average incomes (50 - 70K)
      Took decisive action on GFC
      Avoided recession
      Unemployment still falling
      For business there has been massive increase in infrastructure spending (roads, rail, ports)
      set renewable energy targets - underpinned by rebates and development of large solar plant
      broadband roll out etc

      This is not a bad record for two and a half years in government during which we have seen the world wide effects of the GFC.

      The RSPT is not just about taxing large mining companies on superprofits.  It is about using this money to fund general reduction in company tax, it is about infrastructure spending and support to small business.

      As for your description of the ‘strategically silly shelving” of the ETS you have demonstrated that you do not really fully understand what happened.  The government has not shelved the ETS.  Unfortunately all the productive negotiations which were originally supported by Tony Abbott in his party room were suddenly trashed by the same man.  The legislation was presented twice and rejected.  That does not mean it has been shelved.  I respect the fact that Rudd did not do the populist thing of taking us to an un necessary double dissolution on this issue.

    • Ben81 says:

      03:55pm | 13/06/10

      “Certainly the ground work was laid in the lead up to the Henry Review and the Minerals Council itself seemed in favour in principle of such a tax”
      No, they never wanted anything like the profits tax on top of the existing taxes imposed on the companies they represent, and reading one submission to the Henry review is not what I’d call consultation.  That’s a weak copout, read their responses on the Minerals Council website just for a start.  The mining companies were seen as an easy target for Rudd to use to play Robin Hood, and it’s blown up in his face.

      I’m not going to bother going point by point through your list of “achievements” there, but i’m sure you’ll see that a common theme of many of them (the less vague ones) is throwing more and more money at things.  It’s easy for a new government to pretty much say “the amount the previous government spent wasn’t high enough, just look at how much we can spend”.  No matter what the Liberals spent during their time, it would never ever be enough, and Labor would always have to spend more as if that shows they’re more responsible.  How long can that possibly go on without attempting more tax grabs, such as with the Mining industry today?

    • Adam Diver says:

      04:08pm | 13/06/10

      If Rudd loses this election the double dissolution won’t be all that unneccessary then.

      Me thinks this site has been hijacked I have not seen so much Pro-Labor rhetoric on here before particularly for a fairly inocuous article. Not saying you can’t have pro-labor views but the timing, size, well-researched posts and the fact that most of the posters are new smells a little off.

    • Back row says:

      05:41pm | 13/06/10

      Dear Holly,
      I call staffer.
      Can’t you see the damage you’re doing?  People know.  The word is out.

    • Bruce says:

      11:31am | 12/06/10

      So everyone is telling fibbs eh ???  Also, Does not the “buck” end with the PM ??

    • nosthow says:

      12:55pm | 12/06/10

      The Liberal party had a good leader in Turnbull and voted him out for the last man standing - Abbott. Before the vote no-one wanted Abbott but as soon as he took the leadership - by 1 vote only - everyone cheered and said yes of course hes our man. But what a disappointment he is. A 2nd rate leader of what was once a top line party. Rudd will win the next election for one reason alone - the Liberals have no leadership !

    • Robert Smissen , rural SA says:

      11:25pm | 13/06/10

      HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM, it would seem that my mate Tony has you rattled otherwise why you try to denigate him. Look at the choice A well educated man, adored by his family, respected by his staff, works for charities was part of Australia’s most successful administration or a low level diplomat who ruined QLD health, everything he touches turns to sh*t, hangs around getting legless in sleazy strip joints & can’t even retain staff

    • nosthow says:

      04:28pm | 14/06/10

      @Robert Smissen - not rattled Robert - amused - the Liberal Party only chose him because no-one else wanted the job except Turnbull who they should have kept. i suspect they will soon return to turnbull robert ?

    • Articulate and extremely Handsome liberal,not a un says:

      01:22pm | 12/06/10

      Thank you comrade Real ,but the attack on Rudd will not have to look at anything more than fact,Mr Abbott is simply the voice of discontent representing libs who want something more than tissue thin spin,huge announcements,backflips,do you know something,working families can be bought with for $1000,do you know something,the greatest morale challenge we face is working families who want an ETS,working families also want Colas so the kids of mine working families can share one computer among 15,do you know something,the attack on Rudd started the day he opened his mouth,do you know something,it wont stop till he shuts it,do you know something this website might be banned under Rudd,not Conroy filters,wearing a little thin isnt it

    • Jason says:

      11:01pm | 12/06/10

      Onya Christian Real, you speak the truth mate. This guy above is a prime example of a Lib nutter!
      To Brian Taylor below, “every poll I’ve seen has him losing” - checkout the latest Essential Polling with Labour still ahead. It just wasn’t well reported by the MSM.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      04:36pm | 13/06/10

      Articulate? No. Punctuation might help. Handsome? I’ll take your word for it.

    • Brian Taylor says:

      01:55pm | 12/06/10

      I fail to see just how rudd will be voted back in. maybe I’ve been missing the polls that show he’s in the lead, every poll I’ve seen has him losing.
      He really doesn’t deserve to lead Australia anywhere, so far his record is not something to be proud about, is it?

    • Evan Findlay says:

      04:10pm | 12/06/10

      The problem with Labor is Mr Rudd’s popularity. The problem with the conservatives is Mr Abbott’s even lower popularity. I think both parties need to drop their leaders and offer an alternative. I see only Mr. Turnbull as being competent enough in the Liberal party and Mr Combet as the successor in the Labor party.

    • Robert Smissen , rural SA says:

      12:19am | 13/06/10

      He is relying on the great unwashed & the lethal apathy of the average Australian voter.

    • watchingwithinterest says:

      02:06pm | 12/06/10

      The attacks on Mr Rudd are of his own making.  I cannot recall how many times I’ve heard members of cabinet call Joe Hockey - sloppy Joe or Tony Abbott Phoney Tony.  Mr Rudd is the Prime Minister and the labor party are the governing party of this country it is up to them to set the standard of behaviour.  After all they are supposed to be ‘leading’ this nation. Whilst you may be sick of the attacks on Mr Rudd I am sick of hearing about Howard.  When will this government stop looking to the past to excuse their behaviour and start leading by example.

    • Wordburger says:

      12:30pm | 13/06/10

      The opposition need to set a high standard of behaviour too. I don’t recall Kevin Rudd ever abusing John Howard before the last election. But at that time there were harsh personal attacks on Rudd from every quarter: remember the smear about the strip joint, the bulldust about the Sunrise dawn ceremony, descriptions of Rudd as Dr Death, accusations that Rudd was cruel to his staff, etc etc. The coalition has continued with the politics of nastiness in opposition, certain in the belief that they were robbed of power by some kind of mistake, and that if they can harass and harangue the government enough, people will lose the will to support it.

      To some extent this mean streak has delivered results. It’s pretty hard for anyone to deny responsibility for the insulation deaths - which were certainly not the fault of anyone in government - without sounding heartless. And people seem to want to hear more about the blunders in the schools building program than the successes. There have been some mistakes, some quickfire policies that had unintended consequences. But on the whole, these policies have delivered the intended results: keeping people in jobs.

      The pace of reform and action led by the Rudd government has made the Howard years look like the land where time stood still. One major policy has been knocked down. If voters wanted an ETS they really should be casting the blame at the party that scotched the agreement: Tony Abbott’s liberal party.

    • Robert Smissen , rural SA says:

      11:31pm | 13/06/10

      Wordburger What “smear” about hanging out at Scores a notorious strip joint, he not only admitted it he also admitted getting so drunk he couldn’t remember what happened. As for the ETS the little wuss had a Double D trigger & he lacked the ticker to pull it

    • Anjuli says:

      02:55pm | 12/06/10

      Here is an easy way out for Rudd————Election Please, can’t wait any longer.

    • hamish says:

      11:37pm | 12/06/10

      Rudd looked a phony from the start but he got lucky ....timimg is everything in politics ....sadly as he lurches from one disaster to the next he is now in very real danger of causing serious damage to the country ...please Rudd take a step back and do nothing until the next election ....give the next guy a chance

    • Press says:

      05:45pm | 12/06/10

      So a whining pack of Lib fanboyz will decide the term of our democratically elected governments from now on, eh.

      Yeah yeah. For sure that’ll work.

    • MJ says:

      09:24pm | 12/06/10

      What, in heavens name, is the obsession with sports and sports analogies.

      Seriously, football, with any shape of ball, is a sport, a game.

      It is not something to be taken seriously, and everyone who thinks that football of any persuasion is of any import should have their head examined.

      The fact that politics that actually affect the lives of Australians is likened, and the fact that sports is used as an effective distraction is sad. I’m not sure whether it talks more about the stupidity of the masses, or the avarice of the ruling “class”.

      Here comes another $20 billion of debt for the nation… but wait… the ball is in the court and xxxxx SCORES… Sigh.

    • mark says:

      08:31am | 13/06/10

      The one I really feel sorry for, with labour imploding etc, is poor Peter Costello.  He must be wondering what might have been .......

    • Won't be conned twice says:

      10:57am | 13/06/10

      its not just Rudd that is the problem as he is not responsible for everything the government does. They are all as incompetent as each other. Swan, Gillard, Tanner, Wong and Garret are all tainted with the incompetence and dishonest brush. The people, despite the cries from the looney left, are waking up to the fact the Australian people were conned at the last election. Well may we say God Save the Queen as nothing will save the Labor Party.

    • Godwin says:

      01:41pm | 13/06/10

      Its interesting to compare the value of the two bicycles given to Abbott but not declared (approx $7200) with Kevie’s crappy old ute which was lent to him and declared on his list of percunary interests.
      In the interest of media balance, perhaps we should have week after week of media rubbish about how Abbott is a liar and a crook.

    • WKH says:

      03:39pm | 13/06/10

      Proven lies already Godwin…you blokes are bloody desperate aren’t you.  Notice you lot are suddenly out in force..Don’t like whats happening out there do you. Suck it up brother…LMFAO…...This blokes dead in the water and your lies wont help this time round…Oh happy days…

    • nosthow says:

      04:54pm | 13/06/10

      Send him an email Godwin !

    • Sooz says:

      07:39pm | 13/06/10

      Godwin,

      Abbott owns two bicycles, one he keeps in Sydney and one in Canberra. He returned the bicycle given to him. Case closed.

      Do some research before you start calling him a “liar and a crook”.

    • Christian Real says:

      09:12pm | 13/06/10

      Goodwin,
      Perhaps it should become known as bicyclegate and a Senate inquiry held into why Tony abbott was given these two bicycles.
      It not surprising that Abbott failed to declare these bicycles on his list of percunary interests.
      As workplace relations Minister in the former Howard government, Tony Abbott failed to declare a $100,000 trust fund that he had set up in late August 1998, but didn’t declare it until December 3, 1998.
      The trust fund was set up by Tony Abbott to bankroll legal action against Pauline hanson and One Nation.
      http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/08/26/1061663793191.html

    • Harriet says:

      07:20am | 14/06/10

      Hey Godwin, just between you and me.  After the senate inquiry how is it that Abetz has been promoted and Turnbull was chucked by the Libs?

    • Against the Man says:

      03:43pm | 13/06/10

      After reading today’s Sunday Telegraph which contains enough articles to tear Rudd a new one, I feel that nothing can save ruddy’s legacy whether he wins the next election or not. Rudd is his own worse enemy and Australia is paying the price of his incompetence.

    • Press says:

      06:59am | 14/06/10

      The Tele? You’re relying on the Tele for the base of your posts.  Well there’s your problem, right there.

      Sure, it’s often wise to cross check media “facts”. For the Tele, its always necessary. Really. The Tele is the least reliable of all the daily blatts, bar the Sun Herald.

      No need to buy more papers - just have a squizz around on line. Seriously folks, the Tele as a source of fact -or overblown opinion - is just a joke.

    • Richard says:

      10:49pm | 13/06/10

      Don’t know how Mark figures the most likely outcome of the election is a Labor victory…. I predict that the way things are going Labor will be wiped out in WA and lose Qld seats as well. They might hold up in Tas/Vic/SA but they are probably in trouble in NSW as well.

    • Dude says:

      12:42pm | 14/06/10

      The only things in trouble in this country are the conservatives. Their gloating and bias displayed in their propaganda machines is reminiscent of the German nazis.
      True Liberals will desert this conservative party and will only return when Abbutt has gone. Look at the preferred PM polls Krudd is still 10% ahead of Abbutt.

    • Ben81 says:

      02:09pm | 14/06/10

      Oh yeah,  whenever I think of perceived “gloating and bias” among other things the first thing I think of too is the nazis.  Sometimes I like to mention that fact on the internet because I think it makes my arguments sound stronger and I don’t think it shows that I’m completely incapable of objective thought at all.

      /sarcasm off

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @popculturechris: Meanwhile, Gotye holds no.1 for a sixth massive week in the US - "that" song has now sold over 4 million copies there.

ToryShepherd

@loupascale if the survey made you sad, probably skip the comments...

Paul Colgan

@paulwiggins @richardkendall that fountain pens yarn is a great social trend story

Paul Colgan

I like how a tip erodes so only you can use it MT “@paulwiggins: BBC News - Why are fountain pen sales rising? http://t.co/0hk2MRtf

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

When you take on a job like being Environment Minister there’s some hits you can see coming. …

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

Welcome to this week’s I Call Bullshit column. It’s a regular column that looks at skulduggery…

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

We are taught early in life that we should not question authority. We must listen to our parents, our…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter