It’s been pilloried in song by Paul Kelly as a stuffy and boring place where nothing interesting ever happens, but if someone made a film about the past five months of politics in the City of Churches it would probably attract an MA rating.

Mike Rann, Isobel Redmond and the woman who derailed the campaign, Michelle Chantelois.

Economically and culturally South Australia is humming along. Just 10 years ago, in the backdraft of the $3.15 billion collapse of the State Bank on Labor’s watch, it was an economic basketcase which young people were queuing to leave.

Last Thursday, on the day I started this piece by sitting down with Premier Mike Rann, the national employment figures confirmed that SA has yet again registered the lowest jobless rate in the land.

Arriving at the airport I’m told that all the hotels are full and they’ve almost run out of hire cars, as the city fills with joyful bogans for this weekend’s Clipsal V8 race, capping two months of awesome good times which have included Lance Armstrong’s visit for the Tour Down Under, the Womad world music concerts and the Adelaide Festival and Fringe.

SA has got its groove back. People are moving back here, property prices are up, every time someone turns over a rock they find a lucrative mineral deposit. And in the midst of all this, the once-unassailable Mike Rann should be cruising to victory as he seeks a third term in a government that, until recently, had been untroubled by scandal.

All that changed back in October when Mike Rann was punched repeatedly in the face with a rolled-up copy of Wine State magazine (hey, this is Adelaide after all) by Rick Phillips, the utterly ropeable estranged husband of former parliamentary waitress Michelle Chantelois, who shared a friendship which Rann insists was never more than “flirty”.

In her subsequent paid interview on Channel Seven, the content of which was furiously denied by Rann and the subject of defamation action, Chantelois claimed it went well beyond flirty, with wild, detail-laden tales of secret dalliances.

Many people in SA have felt sympathy for Rann over this episode. He was not married at the time of his friendship with Chantelois, who issued a fairly audacious demand in her interview for the unmarried Rann to apologise to her husband, even though she was the only one in a position to have broken her vows.

But other South Australians have interpreted the Chantelois episode as an example of Rann’s spin, and their conviction that the man disparaged as “Media Mike” could talk his way out of anything.

Beyond that it’s simply been a massive distraction, with Chantelois crashing the opening of an art gallery by Mike Rann and his wife Sasha Carruzzo, and only last Thursday, Rick Phillips buying a seat for a debate between Treasurer Kevin Foley and his Liberal opponent, commandeering the microphone to make a series of wildly defamatory claims about Rann which cannot be repeated here.

At these times it has looked more like the sequel to Fatal Attraction than an election campaign. Labor clearly is worried about the impact it has had, with Rann’s wife even doing a front page interview with The Adelaide Advertiser where she spoke genuinely of Mike’s decency and loyalty, and her unyielding trust for him.

When I meet Rann at his office in Victoria Square he is relaxed. And without using Bill Clinton’s famous quote, he has one key message – it’s the economy, stupid.

The former journalist, like his good friend Bob Carr, is an easy guy to interview as he speaks in methodical sentences, doesn’t umm or ahh, and it’s a contrast with his new opponent Isobel Redmond who is very much at the unpolished end of the political spectrum as I’ll find in my interview with her.

And on the economy Rann has a good story to tell and he tells it well.

“There’s 114,000 more people in work – that’s more than two AAMI Stadiums full of people,” he says in reference to the home ground of the mighty Adelaide Crows.

“There was not a national commentator eight years ago who did not refer to us as rustbelt or rustbucket – now, there’s not a single commentator in the country who is saying that.”

“I’ve been in the state since 1977 and decade after decade we have always had higher unemployment than the rest of Australia. None of these things come about by chance, they come about by choice.”

Rann says that the foundations for SA’s new growth were laid when he came to office and, with respected business leader Robert Champion de Crespigny and his knockabout Treasurer Kevin Foley, rented a room at the Hyatt hotel for a weekend to “war-room” a blueprint for the state’s economic recovery.

Central to this was the decision to pull back from support for failing manufacturing industries such as whitegoods and cars and to use government money to co-fund drilling projects in the mining industry.

“We anticipated a three-fold increase in mining exploration and we got a 10-fold increase,” he says. “They found stuff everywhere.”

The regional growth has not just been driving by mining but renewable energy - with 8 per cent of nation’s population SA has 47 per cent of its wind farms – and much of this has come about through Rann’s aggressively pro-development stance.

“We basically changed the regulations, there was none of that not in my backyard syndrome that was happening in the eastern states.”

For the city, the biggest contributor to the economic turnaround has been defence, with SA winning $44 billion worth of defence contracts.

“We knew that the most important thing that we had to get back was our confidence,” Rann says. There was always this sense that our kids had to go interstate to find careers. That’s not there any more.”

Rann has gone from a whopping 70 per cent high in the approval ratings to a more vulnerable 45 per cent. His party now sits 50-50 with the Liberal Opposition with predictions of a hung Parliament, or worse, an unceremonious Kennett-style exit in the middle of an economic high. Rann appears frustrated with this.

“People think that these things just came about. We have to remind people that this did not come about by accident. People have to ask themselves who is best equipped to keep the momentum going.”

He says the Liberals have failed to provide any costings on their promises and have fabricated their attacks on government’s policies, principally the contentious rebuilding of the Royal Adelaide hospital and the Adelaide Oval upgrade.

He believes the media has been negligent in failing to hold the Liberals up to scrutiny. But he bristles at suggestions that it’s principally been the distraction from the Chantelois and Phillips circus that is knocking the government off message.

“People are sick and tired of it,” Rann says of the episode’s continuing emergence in the campaign.

“People come up to me in the street and say they are sick and tired of hearing about it. I was campaigning in the marginal seat of Norwood and people were stopping me saying they were sick of it.”

“It’s an obsession of some parts of the media because it’s easier to report than disability policy or education policy. Some of the coverage here – like on Channel Nine for two nights running after the debate the news coverage was about the makeup that was worn during the debate. South Australians deserve better than that and we are picking that up out there in the electorates.”

Down at State Parliament the following day, Isobel Redmond has scored something of a coup. The political novice started her career as leader eight months ago with some unusual stunts – she volunteered to be shot with a taser gun so she could better inform her law and order policy, she was photographed milking a cow, she introduced a swear jar at Party Room meetings to make Liberal MPs clean up their language.

Today she’s been joined by the most popular politician in South Australia, Independent Senator Nick Xenophon from the No Pokies Party, who’s fondness for political vaudeville has earned him the nickname the stuntman.

Xenophon’s tacit endorsement of Redmond is significant. He’s a dogged campaigner for greater government transparency who has attacked Rann over his opposition to the creation of an Independent Against Corruption. Today he’s backing the call by Isobel Redmond for all all government advertising to be vetted by the Auditor-General to make sure it does not contain a party political message.

Xenophon says at the press conference that he stood in the same room with Mike Rann in 2001 when John Olsen’s Liberals were in power, and heard the then Labor Opposition Leader denounce the conservatives for pilfering public funds for political ads.

“Mike Rann broke that promise spectacularly,” Mr X says.

I ask Redmond at the press conference if she thinks she’s on a winner in attacking Rann over political ads and his general media style, in contrast to her more homespun approach.

The former lawyer says that she hopes people draw that contrast.

“I think it’s an issue in that people are identifying spin for a what it is. A lot of what is said in politics doesn’t tell people anything, it’s either political spin or bureaucrat speak, you can’t even understand it.”

After the presser we retire to her office – she’s on a schedule as like the rest of Adelaide she wants to go to the V8s – and the first thing she says is that she’s having a lot of fun as Opposition Leader and is clearly chuffed that the Libs are now competitive.

“When I became leader I would not have anticipated that I would not have enjoyed it as much as I have,” she says.

She says she didn’t covet the the job either and, funnily, that she’s never even had a burning ambition to become premier.

“No. I think that’s why I have stayed relaxed. It’s never been about me having any desperation to become premier, but I have a desperation to get rid of this government because it’s so awful.”

I tell her about Rann’s economic story and she sounds cynical. It’s the kind of response which Labor has used to attack her as anti-South Australian, and as carping and negative in questioning its new economic strength.

She argues that Rann is manipulating the figures and that the State still has some ways to go to reclaim “our culture of vibrancy”.

“I agree that there’s something of a sense of optimism but let me give the lie to what he says,” she starts.

“Our national share of business has gone from 7 per cent to 5.2 per cent. If we had kept up with national growth we would have created 19,000 more jobs. When we were at the very darkest hour in this state, the government was paying $2 million a day in interest. But the forward estimates show state debt is $6.8 billion so they have got us back to that same point.”

Redmond also accused Rann of taking credit for projects that were Liberal initiatives, such as the Tour Down Under, and says that Mike Rann with his Twitter buddy Lance Armstrong has become part of “the cult of celebrity” which she shuns.

The one indignant moment in the interview, is when I put to Redmond the Labor theory that Michelle Chantelois and Rick Phillips have been working in concert with, or on behalf of, the conservatives.

“Not at all, I have issued explicit instructions to all my MPs, all candidates and all staff to say do not go anywhere near this.

“We have no more idea than he does when they are going to pop up. It has made a difference to his campaign because he is obviously having to watch over his shoulder a bit.”

Redmond sounds sincere when she says that she’s not even interested in the whole issue, and it fits with her libertarian views. She describes herself as “quite left wing on social issues” – she supports gay marriage for example. But despite this she’s got a strong friendship with Tony Abbott who has applauded her straight-talking style. 

She says that she wants to win the election on the basis that SA can do better – not off the back of some morality scandal.

While Labor might still scoff at the denials, Michelle Chantelois herself tells The Punch that she is not now nor has she ever been a political player.

I had tried to line up a face to face meeting with Ms Chantelois but she’s been lying a bit low the past few weeks – certainly not crashing any more events as her estranged husband did last Wednesday. Requests for interviews with her are now meant to go through her lawyers but I tracked her down direct and we had a brief chat over the phone.

“I’m well and truly over it,” she says, before adding ominously: “…but it’s something that is just going to be lingering around, because of it’s out his control.

“Unfortunately that’s what happens when you avoid situations and don’t face up to your actions. That’s why it won’t go away, because he won’t address it.

I’m not doing it. I just exposed it and it’s taken on a life of its own.”

She says she thinks Mike Rann has become paranoid about her and that it’s rubbish for anyone to suggest that she and her husband are collaborating to damage the Premier and his Government.

She says she and her ex-husband “are definitely not together” and that she hasn’t spoken to him for more than a week, just before the court case when he pleaded guilty to charges of assaulting Mike Rann.

“At the end of the day Rick and I are co-parents and we have to work together on that, but that is it. People think we are creating this whole thing and collaborating, but we are not.”

In this final week of the campaign, the Adelaide Sunday Mail published a comprehensive Galaxy poll yesterday showing Redmond and the Liberals have hit the front, 51-49, and remarkably, the novice Redmond has overtaken the polished Rann as preferred premier. The paper also reported that Mr Rann is planning a last-minute blitz of regional marginals, similar to Anna Bligh’s 30 seats in three days extravaganza at the last Queensland poll. Except in SA now, some have attributed this regional focus as a desire to avoid any surprise appearances by Chantelois or Phillips. 

Mike Rann says the public is sick and tired of it – and he is quite obviously sick and tired of it. But with the economy doing well, and aside from the distraction of Treasurer Kevin Foley’s philandering ways, an absence of any ministerial scandals, the only significant change in the SA political landscape since October is the emergence of Michelle Chantelois.

If Rann loses it will be because this one left-field saga has forced enough voters to focus not on his policy performance, but on him, and to draw an unfavourable conclusion about what they see.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

66 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Jamers Hunter says:

      07:09am | 15/03/10

      Well ,my wife and I spent 22 years in Adelaide and loved it. When we left in 2003 for Family reasons we realy supported Mike.
      Unfortunately now due to civil liberty and govt intrusion into privacy and personal areas of peoples lives I would be much more inclined to the libertarian views of Nick Xenophon’
      Sorry Mike you lost me.

    • Michelle says:

      11:42am | 15/03/10

      Libertarian, Xenophon? surely your joking. He wants to ban fun. He thinks he knows what’s best for us mere plebs, we are too stupid to not put all our money down pokies. Thank god for Xenophon telling us what we can and can’t do.

    • Matt Stewart says:

      02:51pm | 15/03/10

      I am also flabbergasted Michelle.  Libertarian, Xenephon?  He got elected for opposing pokies, an extremely unlibertarian position.  It’s a very close and hard-fought race, but he must be one of the least libertarian people in Australian politics.

    • Andrew Goff says:

      03:18pm | 15/03/10

      Michelle. Simple Fact. “We” are too stupid to not put all our money down poker machines. You may not be, I may not be, but “we” as a nation are.

      If you think being anti-pokie = anti-libertarian you are out of your depth. I’m not a great Xenophon fan, but his record on internet censorship, gay rights, even AFP powers are certainly libertarian. To suggest banning pokies makes you anti-libertarian is like saying that banning arsenic from being sold in supermarkets is anti-libertarian.

    • Tom says:

      03:16pm | 15/03/10

      I agree with your first statement Michelle, but the sad fact is there are a lot of people who are too stupid not to put all their money down the pokies.

    • Schermann says:

      03:33am | 17/03/10

      Rann out of time!

    • KM says:

      08:07am | 15/03/10

      The national employment figures confirmed that SA has yet again registered the lowest jobless rate in the land. Yeah well when you use government training, part time jobs, work for the dole the thousands of volunteers included as full time worker figures no wonder they look so good. The Tour Down Under was not bought to Adelaide by the premier mike rann! As much as rann wants to take credit for it he did not. Mike turtur was the one person that made it happen and the rann government constantly said no they didn’t want it. But mike turtur lobbied the government again and again. If it was not for mike turtur this would never have happen. But again the rann government had nothing to do with it, but to take credit.
      People are moving back here, property prices are up, yeah price are up alright at ridiculous levels, and totally unaffordable our state government has jumped on this land selling caper. Using taxpayers money to buy large pices of land cheap. And then Sell 300 sqm block for $390 thousand dollars as my back manager told me. and then this government collects the stamp duty as well, were is the affordable land??? . this government loves to blow it own bags and make its self look good at other people expense, but when you drill down to the detail you find they always are the first to step up to claim the credit for other peoples work. This includes the Clipsal 500 which was bought to Adelaide by the previous liberal government. And Rann had nothing to do with it, but he was there yesterday taking all the credit it.
      Many people in SA have felt sympathy for Rann over this episode! And many do not,  Rann is a serial lire and that is why he is having a hard time getting people to believe his election promises. Because he broken so many of them time and time again.

    • Ben Williams says:

      08:26am | 15/03/10

      I just returned from 2 years in Sydney just 4 weeks ago and have to agree Adelaide has its mojo back!
      Liveable, cost effieceint and a truly positive vibe!
      Ill miss Sydney, that is for certain, but this place is going somewhere and with a young family thats exciting!
      Now if Isobel can get up on Saturday Ill be a happy man!

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      08:24am | 15/03/10

      David Penberthy , surely you can see the parrallel here , with the Howard govt. defeat.  The settings were the same , record low unemployment , the economy in top gear , business was booming .  TIME David , TIME. Rann has been in govt. too long and the people have zeroed in on that just as they did with the Howard govt.  The Rann govt. looks jaded , really tired , and S.A.‘ians want a fresh new change. ITS TIME !

    • Danny Lewis says:

      08:36am | 15/03/10

      One thing that is glaringly missing from this article is Mick Atkinson.  If Labor is on the nose with the electorate then HE is a lot to do with the reason why.

    • Tom says:

      03:22pm | 15/03/10

      Agreed 100% Danny. I am a New South Welshman so most of the election is of little interest to me, but the fact that that Luddite Atkinson can act to stall the adoption of an R18 rating for video games is troubling. Surely there is something wrong with a system whereby someone in such a position of power can make decisions which affect those with no recourse to vote him out of power.

    • Noodles Romanoff says:

      08:47am | 15/03/10

      Rann has ignored the regional areas for too long and any “last-minute blitz of regional marginals” will only be viewed cynically. People have stopped listening to him because they can see for themselves the “gulf” between how good he tells us things are in SA and the actuality.

    • Libbie says:

      08:54am | 15/03/10

      Penbo, you hit the nail on the head.
      The only thing that has changed for Rann is the Chantelois scandal.
      If he loses on Saturday it will be a great example of the media destroying the career of a Premier with a sordid tale that is irrelevant to his ability to run the state.
      There is no evidence he had a relationship with her, and even if he did, she’s the cheater - not Rann, who was not married at the time.
      Chantelois’  husband is a complete disgrace - his issue should be with her and not Rann. For him to be turning up to disrupt events of other Ministers is ridiculous and shows he’s just after 15 minutes of fame.
      I feel sorry for Rann and wish him well.

    • Rob says:

      02:06pm | 15/03/10

      Libbie there is evidence. Ms Chantelois told us it happened. Also Mr Rann is in the media every day even if the Chantelois affair didn’t happen. They do call him media mike….

    • Rover says:

      05:24pm | 15/03/10

      Rob, if she’s telling the truth, she lied to her husband.
      If she can lie to her husband, what’s to say she’s telling the truth now?

    • Jo says:

      05:34pm | 15/03/10

      Rann may not have been the cheater as you say, Libbie, but if he did have a relationship with Ms Chantelois and repeatedly denies it then he is a liar.  That’s what I have an issue with.  If he lies about that, then what else has he lied about or will lie about in the future?  If he did have a relationship with her, then he should have admitted it at the beginning of this “scandal”.  I for one would have more confidence in a person who acknowledges something they have done rather than someone who is lying, especially if it comes to light that he is lying about whether he had a relationship with her.  It’s all a matter of trust.

    • steve says:

      09:10am | 15/03/10

      Any predictions for what plays out this week?

      Will Mike Rann announce that he has long been a supporter of an ICAC and if he is elected, he’ll bring one in before the end of the next parliamentary term?  The small print may say something about it not being able to work retrospectively.

      Will Mike Rann declare that governments should really work more and state that it’s his intent to have our house of parliament operate a little more often?

      Will Mike Rann announce an end to the tax-payer funded advertising spree for all future governments.

      Will Mike Rann announce super schools are just a stupid idea that are counter to the communities wishes,  and abandon all plans to introduce them
       
      Will Mike Rann declare that selling Cheltenham off to developers to build more dog boxes in place of a water catchment area and green open space is as dumb as the super school concept and he’ll put a stop to it?

      Will he say fess up that he’s really going to mess up Adelaide oval, where noone is going to be happy with the results.  Adelaide Oval, brought to you by Cheap as Chips. 

      Will Mike Rann do a total mea-culpa in a far ranging, emotional interview where he tells us that he’s really been doing some good things, but he’s forgotten that listening to his “public” is actually required and useful at times.

      Adelaide is a great place and I’ll grant that Mike’s done some good.  But I think it’s time for him and his team to move on—the bad decisions are building up and who knows what baggage is still left to be counted. 

      Finishing on a positive note, if I had a choice, I’d elect Mike as Chief Marketing Officer for the State—he’s done a very good at that..

    • Zeta says:

      09:20am | 15/03/10

      I’ll be watching the SA election closely to see how Gamers 4 Croydon do. I’ve been saying for years that if the Shooters Party can get 2 Upper House spots in NSW, a Party dedicated to people who play video games can out poll them. For reals yo. If they get an Upper House spot, I’ll quit my job and volunteer to run their Federal campaign. Actually, I’ll probably just stack their branches and preselect myself for their NSW Senate ticket but whatever.

      Eight years of playing XBox on the taxpayer’s dime. Christ, by the second term we’ll probably have something even better than the XBox, that plugs directly into your brain so I can just be chillan in the Chamber, but actually knee deep in dead zombies or something, and no one will be the wiser, except for the line of drool hanging out the corner of my mouth… which is pretty much how most of the National Party roll anyway.

      In my maiden speech, I’ll thank Alex Kidd, Sonic the Hedgehog and my Mum. I’ll probably also make some crack about how they call it the XBox 360 because when you see it you turn 360 degrees and walk away. Oh mang. I can see it now. I’ll go on junkets to Tokyo like, twice a year, and bring back ungodly amounts of cool shit from Akhibahara. Research baby. The dudes from Rockstar will probably have to put me in the next Grand Theft Auto game.

      There will be plaques with my name on it to open new EB Game stores… I’ll be like Brian Harradine, and the Government will have to cave to my ridiculous demands just to pass the most mundane of Bills… Parliamentary IT services will have to provide me with a secure, taxpayer funded World of Warcraft account… Maybe people could donate to my campaign in WoW gold?

      This is the best fantasy I’ve had since that one with Miranda Kerr and the plague of locusts…

    • Tom says:

      03:24pm | 15/03/10

      What are you on and where can I get some? Genius.

    • Bitten says:

      10:45pm | 15/03/10

      Zeta, the vote is in: the shiz is good.

    • Les says:

      09:45am | 15/03/10

      David, nice of you to mention the fact it was the libs who cleaned up the Labor mess from the last time they were in.
      David, nice of you to mention the fact property prices in this state have mainly gone up because of eastern staters and asian investers.
      David, nice of you to mention the fact the only reason for the boom is because of mining. Naturally most of this money goes overseas and interstate.
      David, nice of you to mention the fact the tour down under and the V8 races had far more to do with the Libs than Labor ever did.
      David, nice of you to mention the other side of the coin, of reports about “high business confidence” in this state.Most of this confidence comes from companies who take the cash back to Sydney and Melbourne.

    • ShowsOn says:

      09:58am | 15/03/10

      [I’ve been saying for years that if the Shooters Party can get 2 Upper House spots in NSW, a Party dedicated to people who play video games can out poll them. ]

      The NSW upper house uses proportional representation, whereas the S.A. lower house uses instant run off (compulsory preferential) voting. It is a much harder task winning a lower house seat than winning a seat in a proportional representation system. The only reason there are two shooters party MPs in NSW is that 1 has won at each of the last 2 elections, they didn’t win 2 at one election.

    • SK says:

      10:02am | 15/03/10

      Maybe the reason unemployment rates are so low is because the young smart people have left and moved interstate?

      As a former Adelaidian (now Sydneysider) what I find amusing about the upcoming State election - which is of no interest to any Australian outside of SA - is whether conservative South Australians would rather vote for an ‘alleged adulterer’ or a woman?

      My old money is on Rann.

    • Dani says:

      10:29am | 15/03/10

      While it’s true that Rann “was not married at the time of his friendship with Chantelois”, why does no media report that he was living with the woman who would eventually become his wife at the time?
      It changes the perception significantly.

    • Dan says:

      03:17pm | 15/03/10

      Does that matter? Nobody forced Chantelois to have an affair with him, and ultimately, the only person she and her husband can blame is her. As for the public, why are people judging a politician on some personal thing that happened years ago? It’s none of our business and it doesn’t have anything to do with whether he’s doing a good job or not.

    • Jo says:

      05:32pm | 15/03/10

      Dan, it’s whether he is lying about having a relationship with her or not that’s the issue!  Not admitting to it, if it did happen, is our business and has a lot to do with whether he’s doing a good job or not.  If he’s lied about that, what else has he lied about?  Can we believe him at all?  Our premier should be someone we can trust.

    • Dan says:

      02:45am | 16/03/10

      Jo, are you saying that if he lied about some relationship (and it could very well be because he’s been assaulted or he’s embarassed, or any other host of reasons), you won’t be able to trust him on the more important issues? That you can’t trust him? Give me a break. It means nothing. If you don’t want to vote for him because of this, I don’t think that’s much of a reason.

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      10:30am | 15/03/10

      Bloody hell, Penbo, what an epic! It was, as I expected, simply Labor propaganda, but even I was surprised by how hard you’ve worked on this one. Presumably, the enormous length of the piece was dictated by the urgent need to provide Rann with some support, but it just comes across as desperate.

      Methinks the journo doth protest too much…...

    • Rob says:

      02:04pm | 15/03/10

      Hey don’t have a go at him. He’s probably one of the fella’s who recently put money on Rann to win. I’d do the same

    • Robert Smissen of Rural SA says:

      03:44pm | 15/03/10

      Maybe Media Mike promised him a job as head of his plethora of spin doctors.

    • Elan says:

      10:54am | 15/03/10

      Phillips did NOT ‘buy a ticket’,- he was invited…, and why not? He/she can go any damn place they choose,-if RannCo does not like it.., who cares! (....commandeer the mic??? Oh puuullease! Those of your ilk were only too happy to shove it in his face. He talked. So????).

      WHY do we protect our elected officials as if they were Royalty? What crap!!

      It is not—IS NOT, the alleged affair-it is the oily spin;-it is the quite extraordinary and highly questionable statements of Rann himself that leave SA ‘ian’s thinking…whaaaaa?

      WHY have the Liberals gained such an extraordinary amount of ground??

      Rocket science it ain’t! It has WAAAAAAYYY more to do with the Rann Regime than the ‘smooth, well-oiled machine’ (ha!) of the Libs.

      The only other Government that I recall with this ‘born to be king’ attitude that has so thoroughly choked very many SA’ ian’s,...was the Howard Government!! There is no difference!

      This attitude in the UK brought Thatcher undone.

      The Rann Regime have done it to themselves. NOBODY else has influenced it. NOBODY.

      To watch this group now squirming, worried, irritated, is a bloody joy to see! They had it coming; they richly deserve what has happened.

      Entrenched Governments become dictatorial and arrogant,-I am delighted to say that that eventually bites them on their tenders!

      And I vote Left. Give me REAL Conservatives;-I know how to deal with them. Not these hypocrites who took their ground whilst telling us they cared about us…..

      ......bit like that ‘I’m for the battlers’ claptrap. Remember that?

    • Ben says:

      11:15am | 15/03/10

      David

      I think you miss read the perception of Business in Adelaide.

      The hotels would be full for the Event activity as described, however these Events are fully funded by the Government!!

      Jobless rates would be low, but must be read in conjunction with exodus numbers of young people leaving Adelaide.

      Would enjoy knowing the Premiers thoughts on State Taxes, eg Land Tax etc. We must be the highest taxed in the Nation.

      No support for Rann with his relationships, suspect as many others do that he may not be revealling all on thus topic….......... He can lie in his bed…....

    • Chris says:

      11:15am | 15/03/10

      One thing you left out Penbo - the mad push by the Advertiser to drum up business for its AdelaideNow online venture - this has been one of the mechanisms which could bring down the Rann Government. I’d believe the Libs when they say they haven’t touched the Chantelois beat-up. But it’s got the ‘Tisers’ fingerprints all over it surely

    • Michael says:

      11:37am | 15/03/10

      It’s a shame that the only journalist who knows the real reason behind rann’s demise is piers akerman: it’s all about the antics of rann’s ministers, like atkinson trying to censor the web during the election. We’ve heard surprisingly little from B1 and B2 (atko and tom) lately, gagged perhaps?

    • wc of somerton says:

      11:41am | 15/03/10

      I look forward to a genuine political journalist moving this election debate onto the substantial issues and away from the current shallow and inane reality TV ‘biggest Looser’ approach. We need informed debate about just how well is the State performing; how solid is the factional makeover in Liberal ranks – will they have the discipline to remain united or will the leadership issues of the past re-emerge?
      How do the potential ministerial teams stack up for talent and experience?

      The if we must include more of the reality TV, why did it take so long for Mr P follow up his suspicions of infidelity and who, if any one, has investigated if anyone is, as some suggest, orchestrating the ‘circus’ and is anyone underwriting the potential legal costs. Do any of the Legal advisors involved have links with groups who might benefit from the ongoing circus?

      I look forward but not in hope, for a response.

    • Andrew says:

      12:02pm | 15/03/10

      Penbo do you live in SA?
      by this article it doesn’t sound like it
      People have stopped listening to Rann because of how he speaks - what he doesn’t say, which is anything believable or of substance.
      He is completely disingenuous (call it “spin” if you like - but the term doesn’t do justice to the complete affront to accountability (through the media) that his public speech betrays)
      by the simple strategy of answering questions to the best of her ability (within political contraints), Redmond has been a breath of fresh air, that will likly blow her party very close to taking government

    • Adam MacLeod says:

      12:10pm | 15/03/10

      To me it seems like the labour govt does the big things well (managing the economy and the environment), but does the small things badly.

      For example: Mike Rann (issue with trust, angered Nick Xenophon), Tom Koutsantonis (30-odd speeding fines), Michael Atkinson (trying and failing to impose internet censorship), Pat Conlon (denying cab fares to Dignity for the Disabled candidates), Kevin Foley (our angry and arrogant treasurer).

      I hope labour win, but it’s understandable how they could lose.

    • BensonBird says:

      12:19pm | 15/03/10

      Mizz Chantelois it seems to me is on a mission to destroy Mr Rann. No one forced that woman to have a relationship with Mr Rann(if she indeed had one which I doubt.) She appears to me to be a woman slighted, Mr Rann prefered his wife over her. I certainly can’t blame him for that. The only people who bought the to the press was Mizz Chantelois and her husband and they are the ones who owe their children an apology. This woman made money out of sleeping around via her interviews and she is the one who has stalked him turning up at events. I wish Mr Rann good luck in the election and I hope he can put this behind him once and for all

    • David J says:

      12:41pm | 15/03/10

      Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. Its all sour grapes on her part. She one woman I definatly would avoid

    • Manik says:

      03:06pm | 15/03/10

      The argument that he is single and it is okay for him to ‘do whatever’ with a married woman while being Premier is so hypocritical. He is the Premier of a State passing laws sometimes based on morality and ethics and here he is - having a relationship with a married woman.

      Meanwhile one of them says it involved sex and the other one saying it didn’t. How is it that a relationship/friendship has got to a stage where the details of whether someone did or didn’t have sex be the subject of debate anyway? Just bizarre.

    • Tinman says:

      12:48pm | 15/03/10

      The article seems to list the Legacies of the Rann Government ! This is very interesting when you consider that the SA people will not know what the true legacies will be until after we have had a ICAC , to fully investigate and answer all the Questions Rann and his minister refuse to answer ! The Rot stated early with the seemingly dubious land deal with the old Tram depot and SA water building ! These type of secret deals have snowballed into the SOP for this Government !  Rann has long lorded the mantra for his Tough on crime ( ROFLMAO gang of 49 ) rhetoric that if you nothing to hide you nothing to fear ! So what you got to hide Mr Rann ? what do you fear an ICAC will uncover ? I bet if your returned to Government, that you will again ignore the ICAC issue. Or you will introduce a claytons one, with no retrospective powers! Just like Rann & John Hill introduced the Health complaints authority, farce paper tiger, to appear to be addressing the disgrace that is the SA Medical Board conduct over many many years ! read the 43rd parliament inquiry into the SA Medical board !

    • Oh Der! says:

      02:20pm | 15/03/10

      “Not at all, I have issued explicit instructions to all my MPs, all candidates and all staff to say do not go anywhere near this.”  Well obviously they aren’t listening. Why else would the Liberal Candidate for Adelaide, who’s best mate is Rick Phillips girlfriend be hanging out together in full view of the media recently??

    • bruce johns says:

      02:45pm | 15/03/10

      i was born and bred in s.a. i now live in victoria (last 6 months) the reason for moving partly family and partly the rann govt. personally i cant stand the man nor any of his cronnies…allthough it is not a lot better in vic.at least brumby is semmi acceptable,my real gripe is with the common person, why on earth dont they wake up let us get rid of this federal state system. one country, one people, one govt, one set of laws through out the whole country

    • Manik says:

      02:54pm | 15/03/10

      Your article was predictable David. Did you go to the V8s? But when it comes to transparency how do these paragraphs demonstrate it…they hire hotel room - with a powerful business leader in and one weekend determine winners and losers. Tell me how that is a transparent government in action? Maybe that should be investigated….

      “Rann says that the foundations for SA’s new growth were laid when he came to office and, with respected business leader Robert Champion de Crespigny and his knockabout Treasurer Kevin Foley, rented a room at the Hyatt hotel for a weekend to “war-room” a blueprint for the state’s economic recovery.

      Central to this was the decision to pull back from support for failing manufacturing industries such as whitegoods and cars and to use government money to co-fund drilling projects in the mining industry.

      “We anticipated a three-fold increase in mining exploration and we got a 10-fold increase,” he says. “They found stuff everywhere.”

    • Brian says:

      03:01pm | 15/03/10

      I once went to Adelaide…..it was closed.

    • Ben G says:

      03:09pm | 15/03/10

      Penbo, you might have forgotten one other thing that isn’t going Labor’s way: Michael Atkinson. He is a perpetual embarrassment to them (and South Australia) and he is clearly not supposed to be in the chair he is in.  He’s not fit to be an MP, let alone AG, his incompetence and idiocy spreads far further than South Australia, and his “Jesus Is My Co-Pilot” approach to his job really gets up the noses of his constituents (even many of the Christian ones). Actually, it’s more of a “Jesus Isn’t Back Yet, So I’m In Charge” attitude.
      I reckon this may have led a few people to say “If Rann won’t fire Atkinson, we’ll fire Rann”. Hopefully.

    • Gary says:

      03:19pm | 15/03/10

      What Rann and Chantelois did is their business. The issue now is that he has denied what she says is true. Either one is lying, and if it is Rann, that is the problem since he is the Premier.

    • Jo says:

      05:34pm | 15/03/10

      Exactly - couldn’t have said it better myself!

    • Andrew Goff says:

      03:29pm | 15/03/10

      Somebody call me when the election is over. Actually, on second thought, don’t bother.

    • Lorraine says:

      03:35pm | 15/03/10

      The drop in popularity might, just might, have something to do with the “police state’ that Rann is trying to establish. Tasers, the police commissioner having the right to prosecute hoon drivers, the undermining of the Parole Board, an Attorney General who thinks it is OK to sue his constituents, the bikey laws, revealing criminal history to jurors before the case is heard. Rann is slowly taking hard won freedoms away from ordinary people. We don’t want this to happen so he has to go!

    • Spam Whale says:

      03:44pm | 15/03/10

      You lost me with the “mighty Adelaide Crows” comment.  Aurelio Vidmar may not have the qualifications to coach soccer, but he knows a thing or two about The City of Churches.

    • Robert Smissen of Rural SA says:

      03:49pm | 15/03/10

      What I don’t understand is why journalist like David & co. are sooooo soft on Labor politicians, after the state bank fiasco of which Media Mike played a HUGE part, the media were soft on Bannon & his flunkies

    • Eric says:

      04:21pm | 15/03/10

      Well, it’s obvious, isn’t it?

      Journalists overwhelmingly tend to be left-wing in their personal beliefs.

      This explains the stories we get in the media.

    • bek says:

      06:54am | 17/03/10

      Journos are part of a union. Which political party is linked to unions?

    • Scatooch says:

      04:38pm | 15/03/10

      What no mention we have pandas now? I think having 3 senior federal ministers (Downer, Hill and Minchin - defence) previously might have had a bit to do with the defence contracts. It can’t have been the bang up job they did with the submarines.

    • Still on the Front says:

      05:29pm | 15/03/10

      Thanks for the piece David, it’s well balanced and will certainly help clear up some of the waffle out there.

      Between us, the hard part for Mike is that he has a group of local media C-graders working for him and actively undermining his Cabinet colleagues

      The Libs have much idea, either.

      The problem is that Mike’s media people are running the show in front of Cabinet and certainly Caucus - and they have been generally bone lazy since 2008.

      They have allowed an exceptionally good, but lately distracted, boss to become addicted to feeding the media cycle.

      These days many of us talk about Mike acting like he’s back in Opposition.

      He typically trots out a really lazy law and order “fix” to shore up quiet news days, rather than do the hard work of setting out what the most important questions are on where SA is going in the next 20-30 years.  Ask yourself what Dunstan would have done.

      The people of SA have seen it all before, and it now seems many have decided they’d rather start again with someone brand new, despite her lack of, well, anything much, really.

      The terribly sad thing about all of this is that if Mike loses office this week, there will be dozens of people who gave him really sloppy advice who escape clean and much richer.

      They will blame it all on that Michelle C,  and especially Mike’s “over-trusting nature”, which I’m hearing a lot about lately.  They will then move on to jobs working for other state (or federal) leaders who will all risk the same fate by employing them.

      To cap it all off,  all these advisers will pick up more than $35k each to depart quietly in a rather cosy little deal that never seems to be reported. They have minimal risks. Mike is carrying all of it, along with the poor marginal electorate office staff and the hundreds of die-hard party people selling raffle tickets and making donations year after endless year.

      The first thing I’d do if I were a new incoming Government is to refer any contractual changes (re Ministerial staff pay) made in the weeks before the issuing of the writs, by the old Government, to the Auditor General.  Bet the bloody Tories don’t, though. 

      Wink, wink.

      Anyway, Labor will still get home with Green and Independent preferences, but it’s going to be ugly in Cabinet next Monday week.

    • Elan says:

      08:48pm | 15/03/10

      Awwwwwww! That’s soooo sweet! Poor, poor,  ‘over-trusting nature’ “Mike”. Just give him a wee cuddle;-he’ll survive.

      As for all those nasty pasties around him who led him astray,-may they be invested with fire ants in their undies!!

      Gawd.

    • thinktank says:

      11:20pm | 15/03/10

      This article could certainly be considered balanced if not for that ending paragraph.  Alas it’s there.

    • loz says:

      07:18pm | 15/03/10

      This election is gearing up to be the most challenging for Premier Mike. The Liberal campaign has been able to take their foot off the pedal as the opposition has come mostly from a woman scorn and her ex-husband. While Chantelois stated that her so-called affair was as big as Bill Clinton’s affair and Nixon’s Watergate, in reality it is more like a repeat episode of Neighbours. Come next weekend bikee groups will enforce their presence to voters at the polls with their ‘Run Rann Run’ imprint on their jackets. WIth all the extra opposition, it has placed the Premier as the ‘underdog’ with the opposing party given an express ride into the final straight. In the media circles the tally has already declared the Liberal’s win. This has been a very deliberate attempt by the devil’s advocates to bring down the Premier. It may darkest before the dawn, but come Saturday the scorners will be silenced. The ‘underdog’ may be down but not out. This election has been like no other. There must good times ahead for SA.

    • Elan says:

      10:30am | 16/03/10

      ’ While Chantelois stated that her so-called affair was as big as Bill Clinton’s affair and Nixon’s Watergate,....’

      Really? And where did she do that pray tell?

      ’ With all the extra opposition, it has placed the Premier as the ‘underdog’.....’

      Now THAT is interesting! Straight from the horses mouth…...?!! The ‘whole world is against him’**, rationale, extrapolates to ” rally round the beleaguered and vote for him”. (Nice try).

      (** beat it up to Clinton/Watergate? Fine: the “whole world” will do nicely..!!).

      Spin it around (THAT word again!);-dress it in a frilly pink frock;-the Emperor is STILL buck naked!!

      The Rann Regime did it to themselves.

      Entrenched Liberals will do the same. Unfortunately, this mob purported to be a LABOR Party.

    • stephen says:

      08:15pm | 15/03/10

      All Adelaide needs is a big big telescope. No kiddin’.

    • Davido says:

      09:19pm | 15/03/10

      For once I back the use of Defamation laws by a politician.

    • Robert Smissen of Rural SA says:

      10:22pm | 15/03/10

      Funny how Mikey claims credit for all the GOOD things that happen in SA, no mention at the time of the subs that that the foreign minister was from SA. Actually I remember a kid at school just like Mikey, according to him he scored ALL the goals in the footy, the rest of the team were just passengers.

    • bek says:

      06:44am | 17/03/10

      i’m in SA - can’t someone point me in the direction of where the groove has come back?

    • Patricia says:

      03:39am | 18/03/10

      David, don’t be taken in by Rann-spin. There are plenty of people who are not getting enough hours, not getting work in their field etc. The elephant in the room you didn’t address is the corruption. Rann can pretend everything is hunky-dory and sure, the Chantelois saga has exposed the underbelly of the trust issue but daily there are more stories circulating about unethical practices at the highest levels of government. A few shonky land deals are dogging the campaign but there are many more stories of preferment and bad practice to come. And don’t forget the rapacious treasurer, his hand is out all the time and ordinary people can’t afford what he is asking and don’t believe in where he is spending.  Groove indeed, we call it mad March.

    • Refugee says:

      12:44am | 24/03/10

      I have to wonder about the whole “Wind Farms” idea not having any dissent.I recall a lot of NIMBY dissent, most especially when Rann put a wind turbine right on top of an Aboriginal grave site.  People begged him (from all walks of life) to just move that one turbine a bit…but up it went.  I wonder if he would have put it there if his grandfather were buried there.  On second though I suspect he would have.  In my house we call Rann, a Laboral, because he is a Labor poly who embodies Liberal ideals; a lot more like John Howard (or Thatcher or Reagan) than he is like Rudd.  He is a media whore, out of toush with the people in his state.  The only reason he is in office is a combination of how elections are run, and the fact that we have no good choices to vote for.  How about we get rid of business donations to politics, make preferences a CHOICE that you can opt out of on the ballet, and entirely let the people vote for who they like.  Oh yes…and make it a federal crime to threaten or otherwise coerce an elected government minister into “voting the party line” just because they want to vote their conscious.  Every vote should be a conscious vote.  Otherwise why not jut put the board of directors for the two major parties in charge and stop having elections?

 

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Watching them do it online, as Labor did it to the nation

Watching them do it online, as Labor did it to the nation

Let’s face it: What Paul McLeay’s done isn’t the worst thing in the world. It isn’t…

Introducing Labor’s new faction – the Greens

Introducing Labor’s new faction – the Greens

The Greens are now officially the far-left faction of the Australian Labor Party.  They have been…

Five ingredients of a good advice column

Five ingredients of a good advice column

Question: A young Man being an apprentice, and having served about half his time, hath a very fair opportunity…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Enough with all the meat eating all ready

Edward James says:

Reducing the consumption of meat and sea food by 15%. What about the world population is it not increasing each year by the same or greater percentage? Those extra people are not all vegatarian they are eating meat and fish too. There is something strange about the maths message in your story. Our world… [read more]

From: The national policy agenda which nobody voted for

thatmosis says:

This whole process has gone from the sublime to the ridiculous. Here we have a Nation held captive by independants and a so called independant party called the Greens, aka the Raving Looney Party, whilst money is being wasted daily on public servants doing their usual thing, nothing but with bells on.… [read more]

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

David Penberthy

Scorchingly good and uncharacteristically sensible piece by @Joe_Hildebrand on the NSW Labor Party http://tinyurl.com/2896syw#ausvotes

Leo Shanahan

Like Shane Warne I can guarantee I haven't had a facelift. Can't speak for @penbo though, we don't call him Sza Sza for nothing.

Lucy Kippist

Five ingredients of a good advice column. New post by me: http://bit.ly/d6bbX3#thepunch

Leo Shanahan

@Alex_Carlton there is no nice way for me to say i want to here that right now.

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Gillard and Abbott get a digital makeover

Gillard and Abbott get a digital makeover

Warning: this has nothing to do with politics. We thought we’d see how the Prime Minister and Opposition… Read more

26 comments

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter