Forget the disappointing tour of India, the Ashes (beginning November 25) is the Test series that creates Australian heroes.

The golden glow is wearing off. Photo: File.

Of course, there can be dangers putting cricketers on a pedestal, but there is one idol who has always been seen as above reproach, Don Bradman.

Indeed, Bradman’s aura as a sporting icon became so great that respected cricket writer R.C Robertson-Glasgow wrote: “There are no funny stories about the Don. No one ever laughed about Bradman. He was no laughing matter’‘.

As the legendary leg-spinner Bill O’Reilly so pithily put it: “You don’t piss on monuments’‘.

But since Bradman’s death in 2001, there have been cracks appearing in the facade.

After all, the Don’s mythology was built in the Bodyline series almost 80 years ago.

He was the shining knight the spirit of Australia against the blackest of villains, English captain Douglas Jardine, who commentator Alan McGilvary once famously compared to Jack the Ripper.

Times have changed and Twenty20 generation does not follow their heroes so blindly. Just ask Andrew Symonds or Shane Warne, who paid a high price for off-field indiscretions.

And today Bradman is being laughed at, to some extent.

Wil Anderson, from ABC’s top-rating Gruen Transfer, says one of his favourite moments on the show was a spoof commercial which “takes the p—- out of the Don”.

The ad featured on “the Pitch’‘,  a segment on the show where advertising companies were challenged to “sell the unsellable’‘. The joke product it was endorsing was “Bradman Bitter’‘, a bottle of beer which was empty when purchased. The advertising company spokesperson said the idea was to make the Don look unAustralian because he never shouted his teammates a drink.

It was just good fun, of course, but the “no shout’’ idea was based on fact. Bradman received a gift of 1000 pounds as a token of his appreciation of his record-breaking innings of 334.

Not only did Bradman not share his good fortune with his teammates, as was the accepted practice, he didn’t even buy them a beer as thanks for their part in his success.

More scathing was The Chaser’s controversial Eulogy Song, sung by Andrew Hansen, which savaged deceased Australian celebrities. The Don copped both barrels:

“Don Bradman was a total farce, a grumpy, greedy tired-a—-, who couldn’t even score one run last time he played.’‘

In many ways this is more hurtful to the Bradman legend than the stories The Australian published on November 2001, less than nine months after this death.
While the obit were understandably glowing tributes, the two stories by reporter David Nason, which ran under the headlines “Bradman Snubbed His Family”  and “The Don We Never Knew”, were anything but.

The first detailed Bradman’s failure to attend the funerals of his mother, father, brother and three sisters. The second was about his involvement in a stockbroking collapse.

Bradman supporters claimed Nason was “playing the man not the ball’’ and, though the details of the stories were never refuted, no serious damage was really done to the Don’s reputation or marketabilty in the lucrative merchandising business.

However the same couldn’t be said about belated attacks made by his former teammates.

Despite his earlier remarks about not p———on monuments, O’Reilly let fly in an interview for the Australian National Library, which he gave on the condition that it would not be made public until after he and Bradman were dead. (O’Reilly died in 1992, aged 86, Bradman in 2001, aged 92).

Apart from saying Bradman was unpopular with the players; he described him aloof, treated the Catholics in the team unfairly and lacked strategy as a captain.
“He never made the slightest effort to be a real 100 per cent team man. He wasn’t a man’s man in any shape or form, never was.’‘

That said, it would be churlish to deny he was great player, although former teammates such as opening batsman Jack Fingleton, spin great Clarrie Grimmett, and much-loved cricket writer Neville Cardus favoured ``golden era’’ batsman Victor Trumper.

“As all the world knows, Don Bradman was a great attacking batsman, but he couldn’t play quality leg-spin,’’ Grimmett said in the Ashley Mallett penned book Scarlet.

“It was a flaw in his batting. When the wicket was a bit soft or dusty, ideal for spin bowlers, he struggled.’‘

Fingleton was even more critical, saying Bradman struggled on wet wickets and extreme pace.

“Bradman’s refused to take wet wickets seriously,’’ Fingleton wrote in Cricket Crisis.

Ironically, the Bodyline series, one of his poorest statistically, only added to Bradman’s aura.

Jardine, who called Bradman “the little yellow bastard’’ because he believed he “flinched’’ at fast bowling, was branded a cheat and his tactics, where the bowling was aimed directly at the batsmen, were condemned as “unsportsmanlike’‘.

Bradman and his Australian team, though beaten 4-1, were seen to have had a moral victory because they did not stoop to the same level of their opposition.

All of which makes an interview the great Australian all-rounder Keith Miller gave to Peter FitzSimons in 1996 perhaps the most damaging to the Bradman legend.

Talking about his first Test against England, he was shocked by Bradman’s win-at-all-costs attitude as captain.

The Australians had batted first, scoring almost 600 runs before a tropical storm had hit, making the “sticky wicket’’ all but unplayable for the English when they took to the crease.

“All the England players were war boys,’’ Miller said, “and they were my best mates. (At one point) I’m bowling and there was little Billy Edrich (facing).  And I’m bowling ... and I keep hitting him ... bang ... bang ... and I thought, “Ooh, that’s (my mate) Billy”, and so I started to ease up.

“And when Don says, `Oh Nugget, bowl faster, it’s hard to play that type of stuff on this pitch’ ... I just thought, `We just finished one war and it’s like walking into another war’.”

Bradman’s mentality here seems to be closer to that of Jardine than his Bodyline captain Bill Woodfull, who coined the famous phrase, “There are two teams out there. One is playing cricket and the other is not’‘.

But perhaps it is unfair to put Bradman on such a lofty perch.

As Michael McGirr wrote when Bradman died: “The uncomfortable truth is no one individual can embody the elusive Australian spirit’‘.

Most commented

46 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • hot tub political machine says:

      12:03pm | 05/11/10

      Everyone worships something, and the deification of an Australian sporting hero is to be expected in this country. File him away with Anzacs, self – sufficiency, the family, the DIY home and of course “the elusive Australian spirit” as the things this secular society treats like a God…..

    • Chris L says:

      10:37am | 06/11/10

      I’d rather be secular than have 50 killed in a suicide bombing like in Pakistan yesterday.

      If we’re going to heap praise upon a worldly figure make it Richard De Crespigny, the Qantas pilot who’s professionalism saved 465 passengrs recently.

    • SM says:

      12:23pm | 05/11/10

      he’s just like any other public figure - we idolise them because of their on-field achievments or their carefully crafted public persona’s

      outside of that a lot of them don’t deserve the time of day

    • Castro says:

      12:24pm | 05/11/10

      What is your point Gary?

      Why bringing up all these previously mentioned stories now?  Have you anything new to add or are you just trying to be a stirrer?

      Thanks to the fact all stories and interviews you referred to have been reported before, we all knew he wasn’t much of a bloke.  I for one don’t care.

      Statistically, he was the best sportsman who ever lived.  No-one else in a major sport has been nearly twice as good as the next best.  A baseballer would need to have an average of .600, a footballer scored twice as many tries or played twice as many games.  A boxer won twice as many bouts, or a horse win twice as many Group Ones. 

      As for your claim he was crap during Bodyline, if I remember my stats right he led the averages for the team and his average was over 50!

      Lets just acknowledge, that even though he might have been just as bad a bloke as Michael Clarke; he outscored him two-to-one.

    • Shane says:

      03:10pm | 05/11/10

      How can a horse be a sportsperson?

      Statistically he may have been the best (Although Federer and Woods both had periods where they’re tour ranking points were double the #2 in the world - in much bigger sports with much mroe competition) but that just emphasises that statistics are flawed. Games like cricket and baseball have their foundations in stats, maths and numbers, and therefore have more room for statistical comparison. Unfortunately it is hard to quantify exactly how much better Maradonna was than other players, or how dominant Jordan was. Sure, they have stats and numbers and awards, but they played dynamic sports where influence is measured in intangibles as well as in numbers. Each one of those men (playing in the world’s #1 and #2 sports respectively) is a superior sportsperson, but they lack the raw, cold and calculated figures that Bradman’s sport lends itself to.

      Simply put, cricket is made for numbers like 99.94. But numbers cannot measure greatness. Indicate or hint at? Sure. But define? No.

    • Syl says:

      04:30pm | 05/11/10

      Ugh best sportsman who ever lived, give me strength.  How the hell can you possibly correlate a cricket record to a boxing one?  They are completely different sports with NO basis for fair comparison.  Statistics can prove whatever the hell you want them to.
      He was a great, maybe the best (but probably not) cricketer ever.  Nothing more, nothing less.
      I’ll take Pele or Mohammad Ali as greater sportsmans ANY day of the week, considering not only their records, but ambassadors of their respective sports and continued relevance to the world, not just the few countries that care about cricket.

    • Austin 3:16 says:

      05:33pm | 05/11/10

      Rod Laver won 2 grand slams, Don Budge won 1 no other male player has one 1 grand slam. So Laver must be twice as good as the next guy.  The rules of billiards were changed due to the dominance of Walter Lindrum. I don’t recall cricket authorities changing the game to stop Bradman scoring, in fact they stopped the bodyline tactics which had reduced his scoring ability, Margaret Court’s tennis grand slam record still stands. Heather McKay wasn’t too bad at squash either.

      Australia has had a few sporting greats, only a fool would categorically call one of them the greatest.

    • marley says:

      06:29pm | 05/11/10

      He was a great sportsman, certainly, but the greatest?  When he was competing with a half dozen countries?  Hard to compare that with modern cricket greats, never mind the greats in other sports.  Was he greater than Pele, greater than Gretzky, greater than Jesse Owens, greater than the Babe?  I don’t think so.  Certainly on the same plane, certainly one to be remembered always, but the greatest sportsman ever?  Forget it.

    • Garryw says:

      11:40pm | 06/11/10

      Castro,
      The point is that Bradman was a great cricketer but he shouldn’t be above criticism.
      There has been too many forests leveled with people writing sycophantic dwaddle about this great sporting icon. I’m just saying he was a bloke with flaws like the rest of us. And just on Bodyline, there has been more crap written on that series than any other.
      Statistics only tell part of the story. Bradman averaged 50, but only played one significant knock. Even one of Bradman’s greatest fans, biographer A.G. Moyes, says the way he played Bodyline bowling gave him ``a feeling of unease’’. Bottom line was Bradman was negated in that series and Australia lost the Ashes. Of course, the fairness of the English tactics are a whole other conversation…

    • Macca says:

      12:35pm | 05/11/10

      Don Bradman was a loner, an outsider, and like so many geniuses, hell, like most people, had some pretty obvious flaws.

      The fact that he may have been scared of fast bowling, struggled on dusty pitches and couldn’t play leg spin well makes his average of 99.94 even the more remarkable. I’d be scared too if I had to face 140Kph bouncers on a wicket that had never been rolled whilst not wearing a helmet. You’d be mad to suggest otherwise… or you’d be Justin Langer.

      Bradman was intense, a competitor and Batsmen without peer.

      And if we are struggling to think of a better icon for Australian sport, I’d go with someone like Alfie Langer or Justin Langer, a battler whose a bit of a weirdo but a real team man.

      Or Steven Bradbury.

    • Bobster says:

      02:25pm | 05/11/10

      Joel Monaghan

    • making me squint says:

      03:23pm | 05/11/10

      spot on mate. this article seems like antagonism for the purpose of the writer embellishing himself with importance via his personally fashioned, righteous opinion that offers no new content. The bloke wasn’t perfect, as nobody is, so lets cut all the poppies down because the empty barren landscape of the self righteous is such a lovely view of life. this doesn’t catalyze a genuine conversation anymore than me telling some kid that his dad loved to masturbate when he was a teenager?!?!?

    • Paul says:

      12:58pm | 05/11/10

      Being 80 years old and living through different eras I can say politics abounds in any sporting team. Competition for spots fierce and losing brings huge recriminations. Great player Bradman was: Tendaulker, Ponting, Lara, VVS Laxman and Hayden all better.

    • Backo says:

      07:20pm | 05/11/10

      I’m not sure how you can back that statement up. He played under much more variable conditions with antiquated equipment that lacked the power of the modern bat, on bigger fields, and still his average is twice any of those batsmen.

    • Tom says:

      07:07am | 06/11/10

      How do you come to that conclusion? He played on far worse wickets than any of those players, and without decent protective equipment. I think people underestimate the advantage of batting with a helmet. And to include Hayden in that list? Please. He was a flat track bully at best.

    • Tom says:

      08:13am | 06/11/10

      Please. Hayden would have left the bodyline series in a box.

    • Michael L says:

      01:04pm | 05/11/10

      Bradman may not have been a superb person, but his main achievement is being the single greatest player in modern bat and ball games. Only Babe Ruth in baseball is even comparable, but not really because there has been players who have approached his dominance in that game (Gehrig, Williams, Bonds) . Certainly noone in cricket is at all close to the Don’s career achievement.

      To anyone who cares about cricket or sporting achievement in general, Bradman’s personal history is almost entirely irrelevant. What he did off the pitch is not important because our culture does not really engage with him outside of cricket.

    • Richard says:

      01:21pm | 05/11/10

      Yeah, so what? Everyone’s fallible, imperfect, greedy and craven. Its called human nature. But those faults didn’t stop Donald Bradman from The Greates Living Australian until his death in 2001, at which time that honour fell to Shane Warne. Scoff if you like, I realise Warne isn’t morally perfect, but that doesn’t detract from his records, his legacy, his aura and his right to claim the mantle of The Greatest Living Australian at the current time.

    • stephen says:

      01:38pm | 05/11/10

      If you are not good at something - and I mean really good at something - then you are not going to understand or evenfully appreciate someone like Don.
      Yer gotta have talent to see it, yer know, and if yer don’t see it, you are going to wonder why he/she is not like you. ‘Hey why doesn’t he talk ? How un-Australian’ ! (‘Tell’em ter get stuffed. Don’)
      He was a virtuoso.
      He wasn’t like you or me, and he nothing else to prove, in heaven or on earth.

    • Bobster says:

      01:40pm | 05/11/10

      HERETIC! You sir, are worse than Hitler.

    • McGraw says:

      01:47pm | 05/11/10

      He was a cricket-player that was good at playing cricket. One of the best. That’s all he needs to be.

    • Chis L says:

      10:44am | 06/11/10

      That would be the case were he not so idolised. Didn’t citizen tests at one time contain a question about the Don? As if that would be even slightly important to citizenship.

    • marley says:

      03:01pm | 06/11/10

      @Chris - nah, the Citzenship book (“Becoming an Australian Citizen”) had 2 pages (out of 45) on sports generally, from the Melbourne Cup to Cathy Freeman, with one paragraph on Bradman.  The sample on-line citizenship test included that question, but the actual test never did.  It focused on much more meaningful things.  Incidentally, as a short, overall precis of Australian history, government, and geography, that book wasn’t bad.

    • Walker Waters says:

      01:55pm | 05/11/10

      Bradman,s feats were iconized by the media of the day,probably to sell more newspapers,but also to unite a dispirited nation bashed by the 30,s depression.then W.W.2. At that level he proved his worth many many times,so what if he was stingy with his cash,there was no money in playing cricket in those days. Fast forward to the present day and the media is on his tail, saying this and that,disinterring his failings from the grave, how about leaving his soul resting in peace as an option.He was no god,just a kid from Bowral who could bat better than most on any cricket pitch.So leave our flies and icons alone buster.

    • iansand says:

      01:58pm | 05/11/10

      The dedication necessary to achieve eminence such as that Bradman achieved almost requires some level of psychopathy or obsessive behaviour traits.

    • Matt says:

      02:02pm | 05/11/10

      Honestly, debunking Bradman is flogging a dead horse. As you quite rightly point out, there has been criticism of Bradman from the time he started hitting the headlines to the present day which makes your statement “there is one idol who has always been seen as above reproach” factually incorrect. It is not daring iconoclasm to write an article bagging Bradman, but boring cheer-chasing from the usual suspects.

      I remember Bradman copping it from both barrels when John Howard had the temerity to say he was the Australian he most admired. The left took the approach that if Howard was for it, they were against it and the Bradman revisionism had a new lease of life. There is nothing new in this article at all.

      Of course, the idea of the pure and noble Bradman is a myth. So what?, Australia has many myths held by the left and right - the myths around the Eureka Stockade, the Tree of Knowledge, the anti-conscription marches, the anti-Vietnam war movement, “It’s Time” and Kevin’s apology can all be debunked just as thoroughly as this one.

    • Chester B says:

      02:09pm | 05/11/10

      Always wondered why he was held in such regards, his stats were based on a trip to a war smashed England shattered and on rations.  The Australian cricket team rubbed their hands in glee at their success, stupid to the fact that cricket was not part of the war effort there.  Cricket was even less important when you have just been in the middle of a world war, you were just glad to have made it through.  Nasty little man.

    • G says:

      09:51pm | 17/06/12

      Clown!  I didn’t know the war ran from 1928-1948?  Did he start it (referral to Nasty Little Man) or are you referring to yourself!  Give the man credit, a batting prodigy who made an enormous contribution to life, sport on both sides of the world.

    • Harry the Bat says:

      02:16pm | 05/11/10

      My Dad who would be 89 if still alive was a harsh critic of Bradman. In those days if people say Adelaide/South Australia is small place now then imagine what it was like 65 years ago. The stockbroking incident for which someone else took the rap and his protestant superiority were the things that Dad disliked intensely about him. Dad was a great leg spinner and his best figures were 14 wickets for 110 in a Grand Final. Dad still bought the beers because quite a few of those wickets were caught by his team-mates.

    • Roy says:

      02:17pm | 05/11/10

      While most people hero worship Bradman, my Cricket/footy mad father does not. After WW2, Dads RSL invited Bradman for a “smoke” night, to raise funds for wounded returned service men.
      It appalled my father that he demanded way more than what was fair compensation for his travel/accomodation/time costs!
      So it is no surpise that his team mates thought he was stingy.

    • M Jones says:

      04:55pm | 05/11/10

      Gary, might I congratulate you on a “fearless” piece of journalism - recycling tedious annecdotes from people who were probably motivated by envy for the most part, in order to sink the boot into a dead man and in the process deliberately set out to offend many who rightly revere Bradman for his unique sporting genius, the many who don’t give a tinkers damn for the mediocrities of this world who can’t achieve anything themselves and who consequently resort to journalism of this flavour

    • Jason says:

      05:26pm | 05/11/10

      Funny how our media delight in throwing mud.

    • Cynical Goat WA says:

      11:12pm | 05/11/10

      Statistically the greatest cricketer of any country in any generation. Played on uncovered wickets all his test career, not the roads that they prepare for the players of today.  I’d take Bradman in any Australian team at any time.
      And if he was such a selfish prick, then how come he still made the trek into the SACA offices every Friday right up until the time of his death in order to autograph any cricket memorabilia that the general public sent to him even though he knew he could make a fortune by limiting his sought after moniker?
      Pretty easy to have a crack at someone when they’re dead.

    • A Dose of Reality says:

      12:05am | 06/11/10

      Funny you bring up SACA to defend Bradman.  this was the club he helped pour into a basket-case.  He was the one who forced football from Adelaide Oval (stupid, considering Football was the sport generating all the money!)  South Australian cricket has not recovered.

    • Steve Putnam says:

      09:54am | 06/11/10

      Actually not quite true. Covered wickets were introduced during Bradman’s career due very much to the urgings of the great man himself.
      I had a Barbadian mate named Vince in London years ago who used to argue that Bradman wouldn’t have been as good against the then West Indian pace quartet of Roberts, Holding, Garner and Marshall. Vince was a good cricketer who had played 1st class cricket for Worcestershire and was well able to argue his case.My memory dims over the years but I think we arrived at the position that Bradman’s average would have been reduced to the high seventies had he played that great West Indian side.

    • MarkHW says:

      11:22pm | 05/11/10

      What is it about us that now “so wise, so clever, so enlightened” we cannot but try to destroy our idols? Any wonder our kids are without direction or a moral compass in an age or relativism ...
      No one is above reproach, not even Don Badman. But we seem to delight in tearing down our role models and heroes. What exactly have you achieved Garry Williams? A journalist eh? Well congratulations! A pox on your house! Piss off ya hear!

    • John C says:

      04:27am | 06/11/10

      What would you expect from Will Anderson?Aa typical jumped up ABC sneered, with little talent but undergraduate humor and the condescending attitude typical of that ilk.

    • Bruce says:

      10:27am | 06/11/10

      Great cricketer, but he lost me with his attitude towards “World Series Cricket”.

    • Gregg says:

      01:41pm | 06/11/10

      With reading how the point of the article has been questioned and the focus of it has even been disturbing for some, I just wonder whether Gary with the Title words of ” Bowling the Myth over ” and the photo caption of the ” golden glow is wearing off ” is doing his bit to plant the seed in us that the curtain is coming down on a couple of decades of glorious cricket results!, aside of course on letting the Poms regain the ashes a couple of times.

      Previously when down, we had AB come to the fore at the helm but right now with Ponting ageing, you have to wonder whether we’ve got anyone of the Border, Waugh, Ponting mould to head some direly needed team rebuilding.

    • PeterM says:

      02:22pm | 06/11/10

      Met him once. I was 7.  I was as polite a 7 year old as you could find. He was rude and lied to me, and made both the rudeness and the lie obvious.
      Keith Miller became my hero immediately.

    • Tom says:

      03:21pm | 07/11/10

      Well you shouldn’t have been wearing your crucifix, you duffer.

    • Al Johnston says:

      03:10pm | 06/11/10

      Clearly, Don Bradman wasn’t everyone’s cup of tea. But so what?

      He was a man of his time and place, born in 1908 in Cootamundra. A country boy who just happened to have a remarkable talent, and the iron will to exploit that talent to the maximum.

      Younger people have little understanding of sectarianism but older people remember it well. Bradman, a Mason, didn’t have much time for Catholics and they certainly didn’t have much time for him. Bill O’Reilly and Jack Fingleton couldn’t stand him and he had his doubts about them. They were all products of their age and background.

      Bradman was never much of a drinker at a time when cricketers could put it away on a grand scale.

      Also, Bradman was absolutely determined to have a “real” job. He is on the record as saying he never considered being a professional cricketer.

      He became Australia’s first modern celebrity. It’s not something he sought out, it came to him. I don’t know but I suspect he was fundamentally a fairly reserved person who preferred to be out of the spotlight (hence the move to Adelaide).

      As for his attitude towards World Series Cricket, yes, he opposed it initially. But one of the truly historic cricket photographs is of a beaming Bradman and Clive Lloyd together in the Long Room at the MCG, celebrating the arrival of peace in the WSC-ACB war.

      He was a one-off, as close to perfection on the field as any player is likely to get. Why he should also be held to an impossibly high standard of conduct off the cricket field is a mystery to me.

    • San Simeon says:

      09:33pm | 06/11/10

      Surprisingly you don’t examine Bradman’s war record:

      1939 - Army PE instructor, a safely non-deployable posting.
      1942 - As Japanese forces approached Australia, retired totally and permanently disabled with “fibromyalgia”.
      1946 - fit for international cricket playing with and against genuine heroes.
      Jardine’s assessment was spot on!

    • stephen says:

      06:06pm | 07/11/10

      I know of a few folk who hid under the bed.
      (No, from the war, not husbands.)
      And if you don’t have war medals sir, please, do tell us what you’re like at Cricket, will ya ?

    • Daniel F says:

      11:53pm | 06/11/10

      What’s your war record San?

      Oh thats right you probably don’t have one…. Well I’m sure the army will be more than willing to send you to Afganistan or Iraq if you join up.

      If we are going to judge him as a sportsman, keep the analysis to what he did on the feild.

      After all in his day parents were expected to be the “role models” for their children, not sportsmen.

    • San Simeon says:

      06:09pm | 18/11/10

      Surgeon Lieutenant on HMS Ark Royal - Falklands 1982.

      S

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@Cmdr_Hadfield @mattpturner Hope you have sweet views while you heal

Lucy Kippist

RT @HeatherSmithAU: Can living in another country change your life for the better? by @lucyjk on @newscomau f. moi http://t.co/E5Ma3kBut2

David Penberthy

@mooks83 sophisticated response. Think the kids parents saw it differently

David Penberthy

More class from 9's footy show, lampooning a baby that allegedly looks like Sterlo with a pic swiped from Facebook http://t.co/BGoYP6Pn68

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter