Prev
Next

Body language: how readers saw the Rudd-Gillard photo

Marcus Kuczynski

by Marcus Kuczynski

09 Aug 05:35am

Must Reads

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge - this is a caption

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

38

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread? - this is a caption

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

92

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref - this is a caption

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

71

Filed under: Election 2010, Internet, Julia Gillard, Kevin Rudd, Labor, Media, Politics

61 comments

Divorce can be a bitter and messy affair. Political relationships are no different, especially when the break-up has hinged on a power play for the highest post in the land.

Readers are welcome to offer their captions in the comments

When Julia Gillard and Kevin Rudd met on Saturday for the first time since the Labor leadership coup they looked more like a divorced couple reluctantly brought together to iron out a settlement than a reunited team working together to win an election.

The body language between the pair in the pooled video and pictures from the closed-door meeting spoke plenty to many outside observers.

The reaction from readers of online news sites showed widespread scepticism about the stage-managed event and the sincerity of the two key players.

Lew of Longreach picked up the unease between Gillard and Rudd, commenting to The Courier-Mail: “Kev looks a bit edgy. But I notice he has his bullet-proof vest on under his suit and was careful not to turn his back on her? Even though his back has been stitched up he must have some painful memories of Julia.”

David White wrote to the Daily Telegraph: “When are these two going to stop playing charades. It’s like listening to or watching a soap opera. How long before one or the other again gets the sulks, spits the dummy and takes their bat and ball home?”

Many saw the decision to bring Rudd into the election campaign as a sign of desperation on Gillard’s part. Matt12 of Brisbane wrote to The Courier-Mail: “It’s a sure sign things must be bad when you’ve got to invite your defeated opponent to come help your vision of conquering Australia.”

Colin of Seaford thought the move did not help Labor’s credibility, writing to Adelaide Now: “This is extraordinary! It’s only a few short weeks ago since Julia Gillard deposed Kevin Rudd as PM on the grounds that he was a liability to the Labor Party. Now, suddenly, he is going to rescue Labor’s diminishing fortunes in Queensland. Julia and the Labor Party are completely …. lacking credibility.”

Courier-Mail reader Joan questioned who Australians would be getting if Labor is re-elected: “Gillard and Rudd have turned the Australian Election 2010 into a Monty Python routine. Does Australia get two leaders for the price of one - Gillard and Rudd if they vote for Labor?”

The unexpected appearance of former Labor leader Mark Latham and his attempt to quiz Gillard after her meeting with Rudd only complicated matters further, as Aaron of Newman noted to Perth Now: “Mmm, two former Labor leaders, one snake in the grass PM. If you still think Labor can run this country then you are delusional.”

Gillard’s public resolution last week that voters would see the “real Julia” from now on was similarly greeted with scepticism.

John Saxon of Melbourne questioned the Gillard persona, writing to the Herald Sun: “There’s more than one Julia? Has the Labor Party perfected human cloning? Is the real Julia really the real Julia?”

Therese had some advice for Gillard in a comment to Yahoo7 News: “Julia, you need to get in touch with your inner self to find the real Julia. You need a dose of humility, thankfulness for your strengths and time to ponder on your lack of insight of what the average Aussie is looking for in a leader.”

With less than two weeks to go before election day and with Rudd returning to the campaign trail, Labor does not seem to be able to rid itself of its own leadership woes after the Gillard-Rudd divorce.

As Ben of Sydney suggested in an election prediction to the Daily Telegraph: “Gillard is going to learn a hard lesson. We might have been sick of Kev, but we liked him more than her.”

Most commented

427Australia, you have nothing to fear but fear itself
375There's no one Thomson won't burn to save his skin
313Thomson didn't answer the question everyone is asking
304Animal experiments won't cure me from cancer
262Who murdered the Arts degree?
246A big day for Thomson, who thus far is guilty of nothing...
231South Australia. It's the middle bottom bit.
231Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia...

61 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Phil says:

      05:45am | 09/08/10

      What you write is pretty much spot on. Where the @9ck to the opinion polls get the results from. I am only aware of two people who are clearly labor voters on ideology and a few for education purposes?
      How anyone could think this lot deserve another chance has got be stuffed.
      They are a joke as was witnessed on the weekend.

      Reply

    • Eric says:

      05:49am | 09/08/10

      Your comment:It’s a clown show. In the background, we also have Keating bagging Hawke while Mad Mark rages about. All we need now is for Gough Whitlam to put his foot in the bucket along with the rest of them.

      Reply

    • The Badger says:

      08:39am | 09/08/10

      Or Malcolm Fraser quitting the liberal party because it has somehow morphed into the one nation party.

    • Bell Yawn says:

      08:54am | 09/08/10

      Yeah

      And Andrew Peacock can chime in about not being ready. Also Peter Costello can comment about Abbott not being good with economic issues. But we can wheel out Johnny Howard and say somethign about stopping boats.

      Wrong side?

    • Marg says:

      10:54am | 09/08/10

      I thought Gough had KICKED the bucket Eric…:)

    • whatever says:

      11:49am | 09/08/10

      And Hewson going on Gruen Nation trying to keep up with the smart cool crowd.  Not that his light is shining so bright considering his stewardship of Elderlie.

      I’d say Peacock won’t poke his head into the political forum for a very long time after being at the wheel of MFS/Octaviar which drove head first into a Fortress wall and owes shareholders, noteholders and other creditors including the 10,000+ investors in the Premium Income Fund billions of $.

    • Mitzi says:

      03:48pm | 09/08/10

      Gough’s foot IS in the bucket! It’s been stuck there for thirty four & a half years. I am yet to experience a Labor government that doesn’t end up getting us into financial straits. My husband & I lost everything due to Hawke & ended up divorcing.  It’s dreadful what bad goverments can do to what were basically good marriages believe me.  We had both worked very hard for everthing we had. He supported Labor & I was a Liberal supporter (mostly!) My husband lost his job but we weren’t elligable for the dole because we’d paid out home off. We lived off savings for two years then had to keep borrowing against the house to live but coulldn’t pay the bank back enough to stave off having the house taken from us.  I voted for Rudd because I fell for the spin. This country is already in trouble with government debt….& remember it’s us that have to pay that debt….& as for the greens, what a joke. I honestly think that Green voters have NOT read the greens manifesto. I urge all of those thinking about voting Green to get a copy of the manifesto. Believe me you’ll change you minds!

    • Brian Taylor says:

      06:28am | 09/08/10

      There, there Kevie, don’t get your knickers in a twist, I promise you the job you want AFTER the election

      Reply

    • Against the Man says:

      07:12am | 09/08/10

      Gillard looks uncomfortable as hell and would have rather been anywhere else. Guess thats the guilt at work. Rudd is doing everything to stay in control, he looks like he could strangle her. She did turn the bad tempered, egomaniac into a crying, wimp. Labor have and will always be the joke party, I know many people who regret voting them in. Time for change.

      Reply

    • Jimmy Letham says:

      07:41am | 09/08/10

      For Rudd to come to the aid of the Labor Party is unbelievable, he was ruthlessly deposed and immediately afterwards all his ex-colleagues were rounding on him bring all his faults to everyone’s attention in the daily newspapers. I find the man has no pride or dignity and is just grovelling for a fancy well paid job.

      Reply

    • Seano says:

      08:21am | 09/08/10

      It says a lot about what a decent man of conviction Rudd is. Like him or loathe him Rudd sees Tony Abbott as a disaster for this country, particularly the most vulnerable and he’s willing to swallow his pride to do what he can to counter that threat.

      Good on him.When Liberals like Fraser, Hewson and Costello have similar doubts about Abbott we can only hope that Kev can save the day for Australia again.

      (Cue: Righteous indignation and a lack of sensible comment)

    • Macca says:

      09:00am | 09/08/10

      @Seano, if Rudd is a man of Conviction, how can he support a party that has lurched to the right on Asylum seekers after he implicitly said his party would not do so?

      There is no conviction in this at all, just a desire for power

    • Adam Diver says:

      09:06am | 09/08/10

      Swallow his pride? He removed Labor from his signs, I assume he is somehow connected to the “leaks”, irrespective he was hardly acting positive with miss gillard, neither of them talked to each other, he would not mention gillard or labor for re-election before he went to hospital.

      I know he is probably unhappy about the events that unfolded. But he is not in high school band. He is part of the most important organisation in Australia. He should either

      a) If he is truelly upset, quit the labor party and speak out against it

      b) If its just sour grapes, he should put his full support behind the government, stop acting like a four year old, and speak openly and postively with his new leader.

      Either way he can go to hell, stop being an arrogant prick, and realise that this country is bigger and more important than himself.

    • Seano says:

      11:07am | 09/08/10

      @Macca - You’re saying Labor have the same policy on asylum seeks as the LNP? Get a grip.

      @Adam - Strange that you would base your whole rant on assumptions and then call Rudd an arrogant prick.

    • Brad of Bentleigh says:

      12:36pm | 09/08/10

      I love how Seano preempts all negative comment as “Righteous indignation”... classic.
      We could cue phrases such as delusional, one eyed, suffering from confirmation bias etc etc…
      It’d be a very short list of people who beleive Rudd is a “decent man of conviction”, especially when he was deposed largely because of his complete lack of conviction.
      Rudd doesn’t see Abbott as a disaster for Australia, but a disaster for his (Rudd’s) plans for a UN post, end of story.

      I find it funny, that the left, who took the line that “we don’t vote for a prime minister, but for a party” when justifying K Rudd’s knifing, (speaking of richeous indignation) but somehow assert that we’re voting for Abbott (as opposed to the Liberal Party). The left really do like to have it both ways, hypocracy only applies when talking about conservatives.

    • Seano says:

      02:06pm | 09/08/10

      @Brad - You misrepresent my position as well as our democratic system in an attempt to score cheap points. Of course we vote for a party. The Liberal party under Tony Abbott stands for real action on ignoring climate change, real action, real action on more cash for private school kids, real action on ant-refugee scare campaigns, real action on attacking the most vulnerable in our society, real action work"choices” under another name, real action on uncosted policy on the run. A Liberal party under Hockey or Turnbull might have sensible positions on these issues.

      Rudd has handled himself with dignity since he was rolled, you can make a negative of that it if you like, I’m sure you will, but that’s a fact.

    • Brad of Bentleigh says:

      02:42pm | 09/08/10

      There’s that confirmation bias again, either that, or you get your information from ALP scare campaign ads on television.
      I think it a reasonable guess that you’re an ALP voter (hard to miss I know), which is your right, but as such, I think it would be hard for you to be objective in relation to Rudd’s behavior since being deposed. Given that he is suspected of being (one) source of the recent leaks to Oakes’ et al, and the widely accepted belief that the man is a tyrant (dare I say, bastard boss?) in private, I think it is unlikely that the man has handled himself with dignity. I’m sure he’s trying to “appear” as such (appearances are everything to this man), but I doubt he has indeed “walked the talk” as it were.

      Regarding the “real action on climate change”, I support the liberal’s position on this (which is my right), but I find it amusing that you criticise the Libs for their position, yet conveniently ignore the fact that the ALP have no position, and will be at the mercy of the Greens post 21/8/10, and as such, won’t be in control of whatever position they choose to adopt post election. You also seem to want to differentiate the ALP from the Libs on boat people, yet the ALP have moved to “appear” to mirror conservate policy, yet this goes without critique from the left, this is even praised by some of your more overtly hypocritical comrades…

    • Freeman says:

      03:04pm | 09/08/10

      Crap,
      Rudd has only two motivating reasons in helping the ALP campaign.
      Rudd sees that if abbott wins then the labor goverment will go down as the worst in recent history and he himself will go down as the worst PM
      Australia has ever seen. his only hope of escaping that title is for the ALP to secure a second term will an improved performance on theis stinky first term. he also hates tony abbott for providing some genuine opposition which saw him thrown out of goverment. don’t forget what an ego maniac ruddy is.

    • Seano says:

      04:55pm | 09/08/10

      @Brad - I like the way you repeatedly bang on about “confirmation bias” whilst, trotting out rumors, opinions and assumptions to back up your “arguments”.  Funny, funny stuff.

      The ALP have a position on climate change, it’s on their website and on the public record, I suggest you look it up. Abbott also has an opinion on climate change, disregarding the science “as is his right” apparently he say’s it’s “crap”. Luckily the voting public are smarter than that simplistic and wrong analysis.

      @Freeman - You must get you’re ideas from the same place Tony gets his uncosted polices, from out of his .....hat.

    • Brad of Bentleigh says:

      05:59pm | 09/08/10

      You must have read some other post, Seano, as I mentioned Rudd’s “likely” behavior, not a rumor or assumption in sight.
      Regarding the science, you again, demonstrate your bias, as the “science” is far from settled. The “science” is not decided by the left leaning UNICCP, nor their clique of approved members.
      At least Tony Abbott has the intestinal fortitude to take a considered position, despite knowing full well that he’ll be criticised by (primarilly) lefties all over the planet. I suggest you widen your information sources, and get some data from both sides of the idealogical street.

    • Freeman says:

      07:38pm | 09/08/10

      @ Seano,

      do you have an argument to the contrary, or just a slur?  boring, boring and weak.
      BTW,The ALP have a lovely mission statement on fighting AGW but no policy (and no policy on border protection). they know the AGW scam is political poison now and to implement an ETS would be suicide. the AGW scam has lost support. check out the last article on this site on
      climate change. not a single agw diehard blogger to support it anymore.

    • Dark Rider says:

      09:25pm | 09/08/10

      @Seano - In your own words, you think Rudd is a “decent man of conviction”, and you are a climate change believer. That’s two strikes to your credibility. Perhaps you should shut up for a while before you strike out.

    • Seano says:

      07:35pm | 10/08/10

      @Brad - Your weak excuses are most amusing, your assumption of “likely” based on no factual evidence whatsoever screams confirmation bias, you only believe those things support your point of view, and yet naaah when you do it’s all about being analytical….lol like I said funny, funny stuff.

      Also you show a shallow understanding of the science, either shallow or purposely blinkered (confirmation bias anyone?), Climate change is a scientific fact, what’s unclear at this stage is the extent of man’s influence over climate change, the possible extent of the repercussions and what we should do. What’s clear is that blindly ignoring climate change with an “it’s crap” attitude is stupid in the extreme.

      @Freeman - I treated your comments with the respect they deserved.

      @Dark yawn- yeah champ I get it, you’re the type of ranty conservative who can’t argue a point so would rather just silence the opposition, Pinochet would be proud. I’m sorry champ you’re going to have to come up with a better argument than “shut up”, if you can.

    • caba says:

      07:51am | 09/08/10

      As a result of the pathetic standoff between her and Rudd on Saturday and then after the Mark Latham intervention on Saturday, Julia said on “The Insiders” yesterday that she is not a human interest story! How does she expect us to think of her in any other light when she puts herself out there for something as contrived and rehearsed as the “Women’s Weekly” shoot? Human interest, soap opera, farce?  It’s all the same to us. She’s living it and we’re wathcing it. Why would you want to watch a reality show on TV when we can have it all rolled into one in our daily does of “Julia Does the Election”?

      Reply

    • All says:

      07:53am | 09/08/10

      Gillard with a ‘if I don,t look at you then you can,t see me’  together with a miserable unhappy face act usually played by small scared children, and Rudd doing a Keneally repeat, bang the table talk loudly to everyone else and pretend the backstabbing cow isn,t in the room.

      Reply

    • Mazzy says:

      08:21am | 09/08/10

      Did the body language readers also give feedback on the Latham -Gillard incident?  That was live for all to see, thanks to the cameraman sent specifically to follow Latham.

      Reply

    • damien says:

      08:39am | 09/08/10

      Julia: now kevin, i really want to be friends, but kirribilli house is mine ok?

      Kevin: *sob*

      Reply

    • Polywatcher says:

      09:02am | 09/08/10

      Julia: now kevin, I really want to be friends, but Kirribilli House &The; Lodge WILL BE ABBOTTS ok?  So no harm done -

      Kevin & Joolya: SOB SOB!!

    • Paul Neri says:

      08:42am | 09/08/10

      It’s not the real Rudd!

      It’s a staffer who’s had plastic surgery.

      Look at the evidence. A week or two ago Kevin Rudd was a broken, bitter man, allegedly leaking information damaging to Labor.

      He was admitted to hospital for apparently gall bladder treatment, and emerges a different person! Cosying up to his political killer! Doesn’t add up!

      Something happened to Kev in hospital!  They do this sort of thing in Russia all the time, you know! The real Kev is probably heavily sedated and in a safe house somewhere! The “Rudd” we see is an impostor! Some loyal staffer promised a dacha in
      upper Altona if he’d undergo a face change!

      Watch the new Kev on TV. Notice he doesn’t say: ” And you know what…” or “I believe ...” and he doesn’t repeat the question to give his mind time to find an answer.

      The Australian Electoral Commission should postpone the election unti this ... this Rudd person provides a DNA sample!

      Reply

    • Harriet says:

      08:57am | 09/08/10

      “Allegedly leaking” is the issue. Remember the shameful joy of Abetz and Turnbull when they had evidence on Rudd of helping a mate. It turned out that the Libs mate in Treasury, Godwin Grech, was only too happy to leak information to the press, namely the respected, Steve Lewis. All made up of course but ran in the paper for months.

    • The Badger says:

      08:43am | 09/08/10

      What sense can you possible take from a photo?
      This is one of thousands of photos that would have been taken in a few minutes. The folks that bring you infotainment and advertorials instead of news would have you believe they captured the essence of something in a snapshot.
      Memo to the press: Get a grip.

      Reply

    • Gregg says:

      08:57am | 09/08/10

      Badger ol son, you may have missed it from the burrow but there were only two camera people allowed into this most secretive of meetings that everyone including Mark Latham knew was happening.
      One still [ photographs ] cameraman, all shots to be distributed and one video guy.
      The rest of the press were in fact gripping and dripping - sent on a 45 minute excursion to find a Fish’n chip shop up the highway.

      If you’re voting green, at least having a full bus is fuel/carbon friendly transport even if Tony would have put them on a cycling time trial.

    • Bell Yawn says:

      08:51am | 09/08/10

      All this shows is how people want to over-analyse things and see what’s not there.

      It has all the credibility and relevance of chick mags that get all abuzz about baby bumps when some celebrity is photographed wearing a dress instead of lycra.

      Reply

    • Paul Neri says:

      09:03am | 09/08/10

      Has anyone else noticed Julia’s wearing a low top to show off her boobs?

      Can this election get more tawdry? Boobs v Budgies!

      Julia is flashing at male voters! But where is the criticism from the Sisters? Oh how they suspend their principles when power is in the offing! Is there anything more to the Left than its appalling lust for power!

      Reply

    • Steve says:

      10:15am | 09/08/10

      I am looking forward to the Telegraph publishing topless photos of Julia Gillard next week. Then apologizing after the election saying “We are sorry these picture were not Julia Gillard”.

    • Sam says:

      10:52am | 09/08/10

      Paul, would you prefer she submit to male dominance and wear a burqa perhaps?  I realise if she were a male, you would be happy for her parading her nuts in budgie smugglers.

    • Lib Voter says:

      11:05am | 09/08/10

      Yes Paul I noticed it, but thought it was just cynical old me…how low can she go !!!?? There are almost 2 weeks to go, watch that space…

    • BMJ says:

      09:17am | 09/08/10

      I don’t understand what the problem is here. Rudd got dumped as PM. Should he be happy? Should he be constantly smiling like he is living the best days of his life? Should he get over it? For whom exactly? For us? For Julia? Wake up.

      He’s angry. He’s bitter. Only a fool would believe otherwise whatever body language he may or not be displaying. It’s a natural real reaction considering he was dumped in his first term as PM by a panicky Labor Party.

      Reply

    • Jack of them says:

      09:37am | 09/08/10

      perhaps the only thing we can read into it is how powerful Mark Arbib really is. Neither facelesss nor nameless, he pushed Rudd in, pushed him out and pushed him back.  He did the same to Julia - second place on dream team but you can run the place when ruddles flies; oh, you’d bette run the place in name, too; oh, you better have a running mate.
      Dream team becomes nightmare on lemon street. Don’t forget the NSW carrcrash. It’s a wonder they will get one vote.

      Reply

    • AdamC says:

      10:26am | 09/08/10

      Exactly, Jack, the Federal ALP has imported the toxic culture of the NSW ALP viper-pit. No loyalties, no values, just patronage and power, with people’s careers and reputations traded as currency. I shudder to think what will happen when that familiar cabal of porcine political opportunists, status grubbing betrayers and cold calculators have the whole national to loot and despoil.

      The problem is that people are disengaged, just like they were in NSW.

    • Labor the worst political party ever says:

      10:01am | 09/08/10

      The question is whether Australia is smart enough to ditch the very useless Labor party or vote them in for another disaster term?

      Reply

    • Bruce says:

      10:51am | 09/08/10

      “Kevin, you can have access (to the children) every second Saturday. I think that’s more than generous, in the circumstances.”

      Reply

    • Sam says:

      11:04am | 09/08/10

      It is now 2 days since they met for a chat about campaigning for the election. Lets pause briefly. Two television cameras and one still camera (plus operators) were admitted to their meeting for less than 1 minute. From that brief exposure, all you liberal supporters have been able to read a myriad of things into what was said and felt by both participants. That is flamin’ incredible.
      Oddly enough, not one of you morons has whispered a word about the fact that a number of the libs and all of the nats plan on altering Tony’s paid parental leave once they are elected to office, because they all know how impractible, expensive and downright unfair to others it all is.
      Even the media is giving Tony a ‘no questions asked’ on this one.

      Reply

    • Adam Diver says:

      01:31pm | 09/08/10

      I wonder who controlled the media for this particular opportunity Sam? I don’t think it was Abbott. People are reading into it because it was managed by Labor for that exact purpose. Otherwise why have the media there at all?

      The parental Leave scheme has some holes in it but the irony of you paying out about changes needed to be made to make it practical is laughable. You see how liberals alter the policy before implementation. If they don’t well you get any policy over the last 3 years, BER, batts, green loans, ets, NBN, mining tax etc.

      Im not defending the policy just the process.

    • Ben Colby says:

      12:42pm | 09/08/10

      Everyone is trying to analyse and over analyse this picture. It makes me laugh I dont know why anyone even bothers as you have no idea what the scenario is or how they feel. When I give my staff feedback Im often told I look pissed but what people dont realise is that sometimes conversations are deep and perhaps even serious! DId it even occur to anyone that they are seriously trying to figure out a plan of attack here?  When I look at Julia she looks to me that shes the leader and Rud is comtemplating. Would you all say something different if they had been laughing only a second later????

      Reply

    • Babs of Sydney says:

      01:23pm | 09/08/10

      I look at the pictures and what I see is an ex-Prime Minister who was such a dud that his own party got rid of him in the nastiest of ways.  I also see a current Prime Minister who is such a dud that she now has to bring back the former dud to help her over the line.  The Australian voter has been “dudded” twice - don’t make it a third time.

      Reply

    • Paul Neri says:

      01:40pm | 09/08/10

      Disappointed that Lindsay Tanner won’t be about. On “Insight ” recently the man showed flashes of normality so missing in our politically correct politicians.

      He showed annoyance, rolled his eyes, irritation - all the emotional responses we show.

      Instead what do we get in Politics - silliness, lefty silliness. Criticism of Tony for saying ” ‘no’ means ‘no’ “. Carping about Andrew referring to the handicapped. Presumably he should have said “people with a disability”?

      Mark Latham once bemoaned the lack of spade-callers from the old school of straight talk in the National Parliament.

      I find it a pity Bruce Ruxton never got himself elected as a peoples’ representative.

      Reply

    • James1 says:

      01:47pm | 09/08/10

      My caption for the photo:  “Don’t worry Kevin, the hair dryer is on its way.”

      Reply

    • Phil says:

      03:01pm | 09/08/10

      Actually she looks like a school teacher telling hjim he was a naughty little boy.

    • Rosie says:

      02:21pm | 09/08/10

      I see so much hatred and all the secrecy frightens me. Who is to say that they are planning a coup to oust Tony Abbott and the Libs if they win this election. What was the Minister for Defence Faulkner doing there???? You never know with this mob! Mark Latham is looking more trustworthy each day!

      The Soap Opera “The Vain & The Ruthless continues…...............

      Reply

    • James1 says:

      02:44pm | 09/08/10

      I think we can be pretty certain that the Defence Minister will not stage a coup should the ALP lose the election.  Then again, maybe I should don the foil cap just in case they are trying to steal my thoughts…

    • Phil says:

      03:07pm | 09/08/10

      James1 For once I tend to agree with you. Mind you Kevin seems the type to steal the jacket, ala Happy Gilmore and sulk if he doesnt win. I am quite sure he was bullied as the nerd in school. (I am aware he is no longer the actual PM, its just confusing as the ALP are letting him think he is the PM leading up to the election so they can scrape home in QLD)

    • Nicole says:

      03:29pm | 09/08/10

      I can see Jooolya saying to Kev ‘I know I dethroned you and stabbed you in the back, but can’t we just be friends?’ Kev says ‘No you ruthless biarch. I’m gunna stitch you right up, you’re gunna wish you hadn’t’. The look on both their faces is just priceless.

    • James1 says:

      04:11pm | 09/08/10

      No Nicole, Phil is spot on.  Julia is not being conciliatory in that photo - she is admonishing Kevin for something.  I imagine it something more like this.

      Julia: I know I rolled you Kevin, but it is time to move forward.  Its for the working families.

      Kevin: *vomits*

      Is my computer screen getting old, or does Mr Rudd look distinctly pale and green?

    • troy duncan says:

      02:32pm | 09/08/10

      We haven’t seen the worst of it! I predict that Julia Gillard’s campaign launch will be totally ruined when Jack Lang suddenly materialises on stage beside her and declares: “If you can’t win a debate, wreck it!”

      Reply

    • Tom says:

      03:14pm | 09/08/10

      “Kevin it’s not you it’s me”

      Reply

    • Housewife49 says:

      03:28pm | 09/08/10

      Well I think it shows some courage and spine from both of them.

      Reply

    • Pugilist says:

      03:49pm | 09/08/10

      Were they both looking at a map because Labour had lost its way?

      Reply

    • Gerard says:

      10:02pm | 10/08/10

      Maybe trying to figure out what Kristina Keneally’s “new direction for NSW” is.

    • dead to me says:

      03:53pm | 09/08/10

      ‘Kevin you will do as you’re told!’

      Reply

    • Nick says:

      08:49pm | 09/08/10

      Jules: “Kevin, now Kevin - I never said you had the gall to leak the cabinet gossip”.

      Kev: “You promised never to touch me like that again!”

      Reply
 
Comment

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

drpiotrowski 24 May 12 09:56PM

RT @popculturechris: Meanwhile, Gotye holds no.1 for a sixth massive week in the US - "that" song has now sold over 4 million copies there.

ToryShepherd

ToryShepherd 24 May 12 09:17PM

@loupascale if the survey made you sad, probably skip the comments...

Paul Colgan

Colgo 24 May 12 07:27PM

@paulwiggins @richardkendall that fountain pens yarn is a great social trend story

Paul Colgan

Colgo 24 May 12 07:27PM

I like how a tip erodes so only you can use it MT “@paulwiggins: BBC News - Why are fountain pen sales rising? http://t.co/0hk2MRtf”

See all tweets

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

by Tony Burke

38

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

When you take on a job like being Environment Minister there’s some hits you can see coming. …

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

by Tory Shepherd

92

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

Welcome to this week’s I Call Bullshit column. It’s a regular column that looks at skulduggery…

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

by Anthony Sharwood

71

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

We are taught early in life that we should not question authority. We must listen to our parents, our…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Light weight

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter

Subscribe to The Punch RSS feed