Nobody likes to look incompetent or inept. So it’s no wonder the Federal Government fought to keep secret a report that revealed the $3.5 billion it spends each year on indigenous programs has generated “dismally poor returns”. 

Money for indigenous programs needs to be used better. Pic: The Australian

Close to two years after a 470-page Finance Department report slammed the Government’s management of indigenous programs and expenditure there’s been no radical movement, no overhaul of the Departments responsible, and none of the 115 recommendations adopted.

The report may never have even been made public save for a long-running freedom of information case brought by Channel 7.

Crucially, the report does not suggest that indigenous expenditure should be cut, or that the focus of Government spending, primarily the Closing the Gap targets, is not a good investment. What it does say is to date that investment has been poorly managed and failed to produce results.

Reading it, you can see what the Canberra big wigs were worried about. It says amongst other things “policy outcomes are disappointing at best and appalling at worst.”

Apparently, the Government thought it was not in the national interest for us to know how ineffective it is in delivering indigenous programs.

For indigenous Australia the report revealed what we already knew.

“The current set of indigenous-specific programs across the Commonwealth is unduly complex and confusing.” At least now we know some white people think the same.

To be fair to Indigenous Affairs Minister Jenny Macklin, the rot set in well before she turned up.  The report says it’s been going on for 10 years and she has only been around for five of them.  So technically she has only blown $17.5 billion.

However, what really takes my breath away is that nobody seems to be held accountable. What happened to the good old days when heads would roll, or an unsuspecting public servant told to walk the plank to another department? 

Alas, nothing.

If the Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA) was an indigenous community organisation, they’d sack the bosses and appoint an administrator to dam the river of cash flowing down the gurgler.

To blow $3.5 billion per annum you’ve got to be really trying. Every week you have to dream up ways to squander $70 million - week in week out. You’d need an army of bureaucrats delivering programs that they know don’t work. You’d need highly skilled spindoctors to create the illusion that the Government is closing the gap. 

And most important of all, you’d need an apathetic Australian public who has such low expectations of indigenous affairs to simply shrug and say: “we’re not surprised, carry on”.

However, with $35 billion now scattered like sand in a central desert dust storm the wasteful horse appears to have bolted. I’m more interested in what the Minister and her legions of bureaucrats are planning to do about it. 

You see the report says “the key challenge from this point lays not so much in further policy development as in effective implementation and delivery”. More bluntly, the Government needs to start turning its words into actions.

Helpful, the report has pointed out how to do this. Firstly, consolidating 51 separate programs into 18 programs could save $1.5 million in a full year. Next, not renewing 25 identified programs which are failing to produce results could save up to $9 million on the out-years. Finally, transferring responsibility for 15 programs to the States and Territories will free up Commonwealth funds.

However, given the Australian Government didn’t want to release the report they are hardly going to set the trail ablaze implementing its recommendations. 

And that’s the bit that really stinks because things won’t get better. Twenty-five deadbeat programs that don’t work will continue and it will remain a battle of words and not action.

It was silly to try and keep the report secret. However, it would be even sillier to ignore its findings and not seek to improve. 

Wouldn’t it?

63 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Against the Man says:

      06:07am | 24/10/11

      Well…...you talk about waste and no results by a Gillard government that does not care about Australians. Old news buddy. Ask Kevin Rudd and the majority of Australians who can’t wait to vote her and her government out smile

      Remember the home insulation debacle? This government can implement one thing and one thing only….....pure and utter incompetence.

      Oh and stop using the Howard government as an excuse. When Gillard and co last eleven years in office, stop getting record low poll results and get something done right maybe then we can talk about a fair comparison.

    • Gomez12 says:

      12:13pm | 24/10/11

      Actually read the article - it’s about decades of waste by both sides of politics in this matter. Partisan BS like this is why we end up with the governments we have.

      By all means lambast Gillard & Labor for the crap governence on display, but don’t go deluding yourself that the other side is any better.

    • Against the Man says:

      01:24pm | 24/10/11

      Actually my point is that this current government needs to get its foot out of its arse and stop playing the blame. The Coalition isn’t perfect but they stay in power for 11 years for nothing. Rudd/Gillard since 2007 and I still can’t get a list of achievements of great significance.

      I you must be deluded if you can’t see that the other side is the best we got. What are your alternatives? The Greens? The Sex Party?

      Get rid of Gillard/ALP and then we will get back on track.

    • Gomez12 says:

      02:33pm | 24/10/11

      So you prefer the party that overtaxes and screws our country by failing to provide infrastructure and selling of that which we did have as opposed to the party that overspends and screws our country by building infrastructure we don’t need. Fair enough, good for you.

      My point is that “The best we got” isn’t even remotely good enough. Yet we don’t have a credible alternative. And the Coaition did indeed stay in power for years for nothing - what did they achieve beyond banking a massive tax-take, riding a resource boom, swelling middle class welfare and overseeing a massive increase in national debt. The main reason they stayed in power was that the public wasn’t disgusted enough with them to try the very unpalatable alternatives (Latham?) Workchoices fixed that. Pretty much like the Carbon Tax/School Halls/Pink Bats et al.  seems to have fixed Gillard’s stint as PM. 

      I think Australia can probably aim a little higher than “Vote for my bloke, he’s less incompetent than yours by a little bit!!”

    • Labor is Toxic says:

      06:54am | 24/10/11

      Are we supposed to be in shock and awe as we read the headline,

      “LABOR GOVERNMENT WASTES BILLIONS OF DOLLARS”

      Themain problem with our indegenous people is education. Go through the Naplan Test Results and circle Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander Schools. You will notice a worrying trend that the will take two generaations to fix.

    • PTom says:

      07:30am | 24/10/11

      If the report is covering ten years of waste LIBERALS WASTED 6 years at best. But you said nothing about the cost of intervention.

      BTW using Naplan/myschool to point at problems while whinging about waste is funny because if it was Howard you would not have know about the issue.

    • acotrel says:

      07:53am | 24/10/11

      I suppose that if Labor suggested a programme of consultation with aboriginals to find out what is really needed, the LNP would paint it as ‘just another talk fest’ ? It must be easier to get a few public servants to investigate, then storm in and ‘intervene’ , just before an election?

    • Labor is Toxic says:

      08:17am | 24/10/11

      No firm data was given for any Liberal Government, just adhoc journalism with assumptions ..... the article does state $3.5B is currently being wasted and the Labor Government is currently doing nothing about it!!!

      I am using NAPLAN because I love the progam and it is one of the few Labor Programs that I support (in this article as have done in previous). The main problem is that I cannot see anything being done with the statistics and that it is not supported by the endemic social structure that allows chilrden the choice of not learning and parents who simply do not care.

      As for not knowing about the issue, only people who are ignorant do not know about the issue ..... NAPLAN is simply a yard stick in which we can gauge a disfuctioning education system and potential improvement.

      What is the cost of not intervening??

    • Bev says:

      08:22am | 24/10/11

      acotrel says:08:53am | 24/10/11

      I suppose that if Labor suggested a programme of consultation with aboriginals to find out what is really needed, the LNP would paint it as ‘just another talk fest’ ?

      As usual you manage toturn it into another swipe at the LNP.  The whole aboriginal industry can be traced back to the Whitlam Government and “nugget” Coombs.  The set up ASTIC and policies of seperate development, home camps, the teaching of their culture and their langage to the exclusion of even learning english as a second language.  Every government has followed suit as it would have been contentious to shut it down.  At least the LNP had the courage to shut down ASTIC but failed otherwise as has every other government.

    • Mahhrat says:

      06:56am | 24/10/11

      What I don’t get is the term “waste”.  The money went SOMEWHERE, and while I certainly agree it’s not achieved its targets and all the bad things this article rightly talks about, the money still exists, it’s just in different pockets now.

      Perhaps the focus should be strong both on the people giving the money out, and the people receiving the money?

    • Sam p says:

      10:36am | 16/11/11

      The money went into the pockets of non Aboriginal people, they dont consult, then employ non.Aboriginals for a paid holiday. Its as well planned as the alpine grazing trial, if your going to control humans like a dictatorship then take responsabillity for the repeat failures, the Aboriginal population is growing at a huge rate, over 75% under 25, it os in Australias best intrest to atempt to catch up with the world, you need to take responsabillity for the day.a.million Aboriginal youth realise the general public are activlly excluding us from paticipation in society, let us control our lives then you can blame us but while they dictate all aspects of our lives they will always be responsible

    • Robinoz says:

      07:13am | 24/10/11

      What a surprise. The solution to indigenous problems isn’t more and more money as some think. It requires the indigenous to get off their bums and do something with the many opportunities that are provided. Those of us who are bending over backwards to help can only do so much.

    • acotrel says:

      07:57am | 24/10/11

      @robinoz
      ’ It requires the indigenous to get off their bums and do something with the many opportunities that are provided.’

      That requires commitment - do you get that by telling, or by asking ?

    • Bruce says:

      08:39am | 24/10/11

      No matter which government is in power indigenous programs are a ‘flogging’ to nowhere. I believe current and past federal governments have tried to do there best, however, it appears never to be good enough. Who in parliament would really want to be the Indigenous Affairs Minister, its the short straw of the ministerys.

    • Michael says:

      07:31am | 24/10/11

      You can only get so far on the free ride that is the guilt trip, sooner or later when all the finger pointing has been done and billions have been thrown at the solutions suggested by well meaning feel gooders, only one place left to ask the question, what are you gonna do about it? everyone else has done what they were made to do through guilt, nothing changed.

      We all politely look about at each other while the crickets chirp.

    • centurion48 says:

      07:40am | 24/10/11

      I read a recent article in Quadrant that indicated the true ‘per head’ figure for goverment spending on an aboriginal or Torres Strait islander living a traditional lifestyle is $100,000 each year. Indigenous affairs has become a monster that serves to prop up the aboriginal industry, keeping thousands of bureaucrats, experts and hangers-on in new cars and handsome salaries. Where is the incentive to solve the problems of aboriginal and Torres Strait islander disadvantage?
      Creating a heap of commissions and inquiries and advisory bodies stacked full of people who satisfy the employment criterion of ‘aboriginality’ does not help one iota in fixing this gravy train.

    • acotrel says:

      08:01am | 24/10/11

      @centurion
      ’ Indigenous affairs has become a monster that serves to prop up the aboriginal industry, keeping thousands of bureaucrats, experts and hangers-on in new cars and handsome salaries.’

      All jobs !  Can it really be considered t o be ‘waste’ ! The British empire wasn’t created by planning. -  They blundered into it !

    • Professor J says:

      08:07am | 24/10/11

      centurion48, you are 100% correct. I bet this $3.5 billion per years doesn’t count the extra money and concessions that aboriginials receive from centrelink in programs such as Abstudy to get them to educate themselves. Here’s a way to save billions “Give them exactly the same as all other Australians and tell them to make do with what thyey’ve got, go to damn school, stop wasting your dole money on booze (then going back for anotheer handout when you need food), stop robbing and bashing people, and take some responsibility for yourselves”. I have lived in communities with high aboriginal populations and I was disgusted at the lack or self respect they have and complete disrespect that a large portion of the aboriginal community show towards others. I have aboriginal friends who think the same but are too scared to speak their mind for fear of violent retribution.
        Aboriginals want equal rights they should get them; exactly the same welfare payments as everyone else (but they don’t really want that becuase that will reduce their payments), treated the same as everyone else in the court system instead of being able to rely on the injustice of the “stolen generation"and a rough childhood as an excuse for murder (yes I said murder as I personally know a man that was killed by an aboriginal I also knew, simply because he refused to give them booze and guess what the judge was told that this guys grandma was part of the stolen generation and he had a rough upbringing. He got less than 4 years). Enough is enough, the aboriginals should be treated equally, otherwise it is just reverse racism that will not help them at all, just allow them to foster the continuing belief that they are owed something. The bleeding hearts that continue to make excuses for the aboriginal problem and demand more money are not helping. Results, conclusively prove that.

    • Bev says:

      09:01am | 24/10/11

      The bleeding hearts that continue to make excuses for the aboriginal problem and demand more money are not helping.

      You will find that many of the bleeding hearts have a vested interest.  They are by far the biggest winners.  Why solve the problem?  It would put them out of a job and they certainly don’t want that.

    • jayad90 says:

      09:21am | 24/10/11

      First of all, if you knew anything about anything, you’d know that Indigenous people receive the same Centrelink benefits as non-Indigenous people - it’s just called Austudy and not Abstudy.  The only difference is that the benefits of Indigenous people are managed by the Government through vouchers and cards, whereas the benefits of non-Indigenous people aren’t.

      And secondly, if you did any research on the topic you’d also know that if Indigenous people received “special treatment” before the law, there’d be significantly less Indigenous people in jail as compared to the general populas.

    • Anna C says:

      10:47am | 24/10/11

      jayad90 you are mistaken. Abstudy has always been more than Austudy and I should cause I worked at Centrelink for 10 years. Go and check out their website if you don’t believe me.

    • gobsmack says:

      12:55pm | 24/10/11

      Everyone, black or white, who has had a “rough upbringing” can cite it as a mitigating circumstance when being sentenced for a crime.  It just so happens that a greater percentage of Aboriginals have had such an upbringing.

    • rory macneil says:

      08:10am | 24/10/11

      Does the sum quoted include the salary of an indigenous man who appeared recently in court and stated his occupation as ‘census taker’ - koalas.
      Good to see that he is gainfully employed.

    • Markus says:

      08:11am | 24/10/11

      “Finally, transferring responsibility for 15 programs to the States and Territories will free up Commonwealth funds.”
      And where exactly will the States and Territories get these funds? From the Commonwealth.

      “Crucially, the report does not suggest that indigenous expenditure should be cut, or that the focus of Government spending, primarily the Closing the Gap targets, is not a good investment.”
      You seem shocked that a report written by a government department does not state that investment in Indigenous Australia has not been a poor investment (in terms of financial return) to date. If it did, government waste would be the least of your concerns at this point.

      That the report’s recommendations has only come up with ways to save $10.5 million over several years, for programs costing $3.5 billion annually, just shows how much of a monetary black hole it is.

      If I were you I’d see an inefficient government as a good thing. Any efficient private enterprise with programs with such incredibly poor ROIs would have abandoned them all long ago.

    • MarkS says:

      08:14am | 24/10/11

      Stone culture = Stone age outcomes.

      Putting more & more money into it will not solve the underlying problem. We are pouring water down a drain in the hope it fills up.

    • Gomez12 says:

      12:16pm | 24/10/11

      Stone culture = Stone age outcomes.

      This sir, is the Room. That is the Elephant within.

      We do not discuss the elephant.

    • nihonin says:

      08:16am | 24/10/11

      ‘Can it really be considered t o be ‘waste’ ! The British empire wasn’t created by planning. -  They blundered into it’ !  But were ‘they’ wasting billions of dollars as ‘they’ ‘blundered’ along till the British Empire was created, I think not.

    • Adam Diver says:

      08:48am | 24/10/11

      Newsflash: Government waste billions of dollars on disadvantaged racial group protected by statute, and left-dominated courtesy. At no times must said racial group be held accountable, and at no times must policy actually be effective if seemingly unfair. Said racial group was disadvantaged in the past, and to rectify, we must swing the pendulum so far the other way, that the racial group will know only a life of welfare and expectations of the nanny state to provide. Government policies will ignore at all times any logical leaps that conclude such life of provision will create a self-sustaining trap that the racial group will not be able to escape for generations, but more importantly will not want to escape.

      Any failure of the current policy, will be blamed on inherent racism of the wider community or because of past injustices to the racial group.

      In the last 10 years we have spent (on the assumption of 200,000 aboriginals, to lazy to look up the actual figure), $175,000 per aboriginal. We could of just given them the money, and bridged the gap, what happens after that would be there own damn fault, or would we excuse that as well?

    • Adam Diver says:

      10:36am | 24/10/11

      Well I stopped being lazy and the figure is closer to 520,000. My bad, although if you take out externalities my point still stands smile

    • Anna C says:

      09:09am | 24/10/11

      Why do we keep throwing good money after bad? All we seem to be doing is keeping lots of bureaucrats employed. May be we should just cut all the programs and let everyone fend for themselves? The Aborigines can go back to their hunter gatherer lifestyles while the bureaucrats can go back on the dole where they belong.

    • Anna C says:

      09:10am | 24/10/11

      The moral of the story here is that you can’t help people who won’t help themselves.

    • James1 says:

      10:07am | 24/10/11

      “However, what really takes my breath away is that nobody seems to be held accountable. What happened to the good old days when heads would roll, or an unsuspecting public servant told to walk the plank to another department?”

      This may seem a little glib and obvious, but perhaps the issue is not with government programs and the public service.  Perhaps the issue, the reason why these programs acheive little or nothing, is the indigenous community itself.  Perhaps it is not only the government that needs to change its approach, but also individual indigenous people.  Maybe that is why nothing ever improves.  Maybe we need to hold individual indigenous people accountable for their lives and actions, just as we do with the rest of the population.

      I know that the idea of treating everyone the same is pretty radical.  Just thought we needed to put that on the table, though.

    • Adam Diver says:

      10:59am | 24/10/11

      No, no no no no. James you are definately a young idealogue to think individuals should be held accountable for thier circumstances, but it is so far from reality as to be absurd. Big government is the only answer to helping out these people (and lets be clear here, they are different from you and I, and are incapable of things the rest of us “norms” are capable of).

      The problem is there is not enough government to help out these people, 3.5 billion a year, only just covers the flood levy twice, and you think this is enough to help close the gap between these people and the rest of us (remember they are different).

      Next you will probably advocate that certain communities be made to move or have assistance cut off, because the only occupation available is to collect welfare. Big government is the key and big government has the answer:

      1. We need more racially divided and motivated awards, sports, grants and assistance packages to confirm the differences, and because these people can’t compete for standard awards

      2. We need to let them live in thier traditional communities (and subsidise them of course), but ensure facilities are 21st century standard, but we will pretend its still traditional.

      3. We need to provide these people housing, and if damaged, repair immediately, whilst never holding anyone to account. In fact we need to increase the housing package, which built 2 houses for a cost in the 100’s millions, probably one of our more effective programs.

      4. We need to make sure we never push assimilation, of any kind, and that welfare traps are created so that we have a generational issue. Schooling is obviously optional for these people, with a heavy focus on “traditional” ways of life.

      5. We should acknowledge “elders” as some sort of judicial and social genius, with full respect and admiration, none of it measured by any conventional sense. In fact we should encompass this into the rest of australia, with teachers, jusges, police etc promoted on age and not some rediculous notion of ability or training.

      6. We should create and perpetuate a victim mentality for these people, encompassing it in our schools curriculum, university degrees, judicial rulings and political grandstanding.

      7. We should acknowlegde nomadic tribes as rightful owners of land that we now use, and acknowledge them at every event regardless of how major. We should also create many rituals, based not on tradition but pleasing “westerners” and then we should accept them as culturally significant.

      8. Above all we should accept the traditional life of these people to be far greater than our own, a life of no sin, of beautiful harmony, and we should ignore any facts to the contrary.

      Big Government knows all and definately much more than James.

    • James1 says:

      11:09am | 24/10/11

      Your post is both hilarious and scary, in equal measures Adam. 

      It is hilarious because it accurately outlines the thought process of the left when it comes to this issue. 

      It is scary because it accurately outlines the thought process of the left when it comes to this issue.

    • jf says:

      11:12am | 24/10/11

      I don’t necessarily think that all indigineous Australians should be treated the same as everyone else. Just as we have a safety net for that very small minority of people that need it and just as we accept immigrants so we should look after those Aboriginals that are in disadvantaged circumstances through no fault of their own.

      However, I do think that collectively we need to raise our expectations of Aboriginals. And that won’t happen, at a collective level, whilst it is assumed that Aboriginals, as a general rule, are in need of greater assistance than any other person simply because they are Aboriginal.

    • malohi says:

      12:15pm | 24/10/11

      @Adam
      (acknowledging your sarcasm)
      I am with you on the points you make and always find myself agreeing with your take on these issues in other articles.
      Equality can only be reached by acknowledging we are equals. Love the posts.

    • Erick says:

      12:32pm | 24/10/11

      @Adam Diver - That is the best, most comprehensive plan for indigenous people that I have ever seen.

      In fact, it’s pretty much the only one that’s put into practice currently. So it must be good!

    • Adam Diver says:

      12:48pm | 24/10/11

      @ James, big government is scary, its suppossed to be, otherwise you may want some effiecient, minimalistic governmental system, putting vested interest out of business. You fear big government but you need big government, muhahahaha

      @ JF, you are sort of right. However no-one (speaking for James here, big government can do as it pleases) is advocating the abolition of grouping individuals, however the different treatment on the basis of race, is well inherently racist, which no-one agrees with. However the treatment based on disability, disadvantage, or numerous other specific classifcation groups is commonly accepted across the political spectrum.

      @ Malohi, I was actually hoping someone would miss the sarcasm, it has happened before and is great fun. I know people say sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, but it illustrates hypocrisy so, so well.

    • AdamC says:

      01:01pm | 24/10/11

      Great comments, James1 and Adam Diver. I have a question, though. It seems to me that, outside of the Greens and the dregs of Labor’s left, there is broad agreement that personal responsibility has to be a key element of indigenous policy. The rhetoric of most politicians seems also to accord with this view. So, my question is, why is the passive welfare model so persistent when it comes to actual policy implementation?

    • malohi says:

      01:19pm | 24/10/11

      Yeah, i didn’t want to just say “I agree” as one may not know whehter I am agreeing with the sarcasm or not.
      You can legislate discriminatory, it is necessary on many occasions. it is the paternalistic racism on which the legislation/action plans are based which are the big problem.
      But the whole midset on the left is based on paternalism. Save the world, protect all things etc.  It is this mindset that gives rise to the victim mentality on one side and the need to absolve sins of the father [to the expence of logic] on the other. Neither move toward equality.

      It really does not need to be taken further than your post;
      Get rid of governemnt propping up on remote communities. Hold all persons to the same legal, educational and welfare standard (at least not on the basis of race). Move into the 21st century and acknowledge the pitfalls of the noble savage fallacy. Both sides, stop the guilt.

    • James1 says:

      01:27pm | 24/10/11

      I’m probably wrong AdamC, but here is my personal perspective. 

      It is partly geographic in nature.  Policies are formulated far from the centres of dysfunction, and thus the policy-makers in question lack any functional understanding of the contributory factors.  Couple this with white guilt, fear of being labelled a racist, and the big government mentality outlined by Adam D, and you have an absolute lack of political will.

      After living my whole life in rural and regional Queensland, in close proximity to these centres of dysfunction, and seeing the frank and often constructive way in which these issues were discussed up there (especially within the Aboriginal community), I was shocked when I moved to Canberra and found that the only effective solution is the one no one here discusses.

    • jf says:

      01:30pm | 24/10/11

      “@ JF, you are sort of right. However no-one (speaking for James here, big government can do as it pleases) is advocating the abolition of grouping individuals, however the different treatment on the basis of race, is well inherently racist, which no-one agrees with. However the treatment based on disability, disadvantage, or numerous other specific classifcation groups is commonly accepted across the political spectrum. “

      First up, your first post, bonza!!.

      I agree except I didn’t say that I thought that Aboriginals should be treated differently because they are Aboriginal but because they are disadvantaged. The fact is that, in Australia, Aboriginals are more likely to be disadvantaged than anyone else.

      Also, for something to be rascist, it has to be to the disadvantage of the group in question.

      I would never suggest that those idealogues perpetuating the victim mentality are rascists despite the possibility that they cause more damage than the worst and most obnoxious white supremist.

    • Adam Diver says:

      01:44pm | 24/10/11

      @ Erick, unfortunately my ideas are not new and I can not claim credit for them.

      @ AdamC, its a interesting thought, and one I’ll admit I haven’t given much time too. Just quickly it seems part of the necessity of politics. The whole welfare system, is far too generous across the spectrum, but it has created a dependency that is equally as prevelant, and I am not just talking about pensioners and the unemployed, the (lower) middle class are addicted as well. Politically its suicidal (barring austerity measures) to reign this in, with any real vigour, and I suspect cheap politics means the opposition (regardless of party) will oppose such frugal actions.

      More specifically the coalition will be accused of racism if they do anything bar dole out cash to racial groups, and Labor are incompetent on financial matters (well almost all matters). They have both pledged to “bridge the gap” again drawing distinctions to a certain group of people, and anything short of increasing funds makes that a lie. Whats interesting is the quarantining of welfare payments for aboriginal people, which has been implemented with very little backlash, despite its racist basis. If that was achievable I am not sure why a different approach can’t be taken to “bridge the gap” particulalry after the status quo has failed so spectacularly and for so long.

      I need to think about this more, but in summary “politics”.

    • AdamC says:

      03:34pm | 24/10/11

      Adam Diver and James1, reflecting on this, I suspect it is, at least in part, a case of the political capital theorem at work. Obviously, there are people who benefit from the policy status quo, which is an odd mix of welfarism, paternalism and separate development. Those people may be few, but they would probably have much to lose from any change. And they can also play the race card (as you noted, Adam Diver) and rally indigenous (and broad left) support through appeals to historical grievances. This bolsters their, apparently minimal, support.

      Meanwhile, for most (non-aboriginal) people, indigenous policy is out of sight, out of mind (see your remoteness thesis, James1). Sure, Australians know that the current, confused policy settings aren’t working, but they don’t care enough. From most Australians’ persepctive, it is better not to have too strong a view on these sorts of things. Of course, there is always the risk of being accused of racism.

    • Govt@FauxCitizen says:

      10:09am | 24/10/11

      All Aussies just love money for free and some are corrupted to zero pride self esteem, laziness and apathy to the point where most refer to social security and welfare handouts as “PAY”
      I’m a firm beleiver in giving a fishing line, tackle, and knowhow, rather than the filleted and cooked fish with disposable plates and cutlery.
      It really is so easy to teach a hungry person the simple art of feeding themselves.

    • One solution fits all. says:

      10:38am | 24/10/11

      I’m sure your beliefs would work well in central Australian outback communities.

      I hear there are lots of fish in amongst the spinifex.
      Simple minds, simple solutions.

    • fairsfair says:

      11:02am | 24/10/11

      One solution fits all… fail.

      Ever heard the proverb “Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime”...

      Maybe there is nothing to eat in amongst the spinifex and if that is the case then I ask a) why do a modern day population of historically nomadic people they want to remain there? and b) if they do, why can’t they operate their own grocery shop or some other type of food co-operative? Teach business principles, employ some people. I’d be happy for funding to apply for that type of circumstance.

      That is all G@FC is getting at. Get off the defensive - this was a broad statement of truth (for PEOPLE and ALL AUSSIES, not just indigenous australians) and not the petty attack that you somehow interpreted it to be.

    • Bev says:

      12:36pm | 24/10/11

      @One solution fits all.
      The rise of humans is of one adaption and innovation and moving forward. History is full of cases of those who did not adapt falling by the wayside.  Aboriginal did survive in the past but most of those skills have been lost.  If they cannot survive on remote settlements under their own steam what the hell are they doing there.  Anyway given the choice they would choose a gun over a spear or an tinny and outboard motor to a dugout canoe.  It is mostly I suspect the usual suspects and their chatter about “noble savages” and cultural relativity that is keeping them there as there is big money to be made by doing so.

    • Sam says:

      10:38am | 24/10/11

      In this piece you say Australians are apathetic, this is true, why wouldnt we? We have seen every Federal Government over the last 40 years waste billions on Aboriginal Affairs.

      We have seen Liberal and Labor Govts throw literally TONNES of money at an issue that cant be fixed. Every Government seems to think that Aboriginals that live in the middle of nowhere must have jobs invented for them, “Lets hire them to walk in front of electricity poles being erected to say if there is a dead aboriginal buried there, and lets pay them $5000-00 a week to do this”.

      Lets continue to poor money into dysfunctional townships that will have no chance of hell in developing into a self sustaining neighborhood.

      You dont get it do you ! Thats what ALL GOVERNMENTS DO, they throw money at aboriginals and never ever look if it is making a difference, because if they dont throw billions at them then people will jump up and down and say “Oh the poor Aboriginals living in squaller !”. If Aboriginals choose to live out in the middle of bugger all then thats their choice, its not up to the Government to help sustain the unsustainable!

    • gobsmack says:

      01:12pm | 24/10/11

      @Sam
      I think your average white middle-class “right thinking” person would be horrified to have Aboriginals as next door neighbours.
      Which is probably why, as a nation, we prefer to let them live out in the middle of nowhere even if it is costing billions.
      Out of sight, out of mind.

    • Tator says:

      07:52pm | 25/10/11

      Gobsmack,
      according to the 2006 census, out of the 517000 people identifying as indigenous, around 442000 live amongst metropolitan and regional communities and only 75000 live in the remote settlements.  So the majority already live next door to us.

    • mick says:

      10:48am | 24/10/11

      To be fair lets blame both sides of politics.

      The Aboriginal problem has been with us for decades and will never be solved as long as the community refuses to get a job and lead a lifestyle similar to white Australians.  The trouble with aboriginal Australians is that it wants a foot in both camps.  It appears ok to forever have the hand out and torture the consciences of the rest of us whilst at the same time refusing to work, refusing to obey the laws we all obey (well….some of us) and to be responsible to itself.  Whilst we all play the game we will continue to be treated as suckers, because that is what we have become.  Help yes, be abused no.

      And while we are at it perhaps our wonderful governments can also stop the blatant dole bludger rorting which grows every year, the disability pension rorting which has blown out of the water and the blatant waste of funding in all areas because the government will not employ intelligent non public service project managers to do the job at the right cost.

    • old fart says:

      11:21am | 24/10/11

      Name one government that has been successful in any indigenous programs. All any of them keep doing is throwing more money at the problem.  Even when they had their own commission with elected representatives billions were lost.

    • loxy says:

      11:31am | 24/10/11

      Until a government is prepared to make the hard decisions, and most likely extremely unpopular ones with the Indigenous people, this situation of throwing money at people with very little return on investment will continue. As contentious as I’m sure this will be, I don’t understand why we are not re-thinking the whole remote Aboriginal communities? I can’t see how they benefit Indigenous people at all? They are exceptionally expensive to the taxpayers, substance abuse and even worse child abuse are common, and there are very limited opportunities to an education or employment. In my opinion they just aren’t working and these Indigenous people would be better off living in the mainstream and having the same access and opportunities to education, employment and health that we all do.

    • Tim the Toolman says:

      12:04pm | 24/10/11

      Why would we not be apathetic?  You can’t say anything that might actually fix the issues without being shouted down as a racist, and the government finds it easier to just toss the money at the issue rather than face any accusations, so, here we are.

    • bong says:

      12:25pm | 24/10/11

      yeah look

      wake up australia! all we are asking for is a fair go for our tax dollars. we’ve stopped the boats and now we need to stop the waste. fair dinkum australians just want a fair go.

    • Ian says:

      12:58pm | 24/10/11

      No-one knows what to do next.  Does anyone here (on this blog) really have the answer?  One that is original, insightful and bound to succeed?  That’s the baseline of the problem.  No-one knows how to what to do next.

      The problem is enormous, and has defeated everyone’s attempt to fix it.  Repeatedly. 

      Making it worse, it now it’s turned into the politics of blame, this has failed, that has failed, billions of dollars lost.  Whatever.

      Instead we get well intentioned but frighteningly under-informed politicians (I’m looking at YOU, Jenny Macklin) breezing into the desperately broken communities and town camps to make sweeping policy statements allocating MORE billions to fix the problem.

      Allocating MORE money to fix problems, because that’s all they (we) can think to do.  As if no-one has had the same idea before them.

      I don’t doubt their motives or intentions.  I do doubt their ability to think originally, or beyond the next election cycle.

      Seriously.  IF you know the answer, stand up. 

      And for f**k sake, don’t say “Jobs! Education! Houses! Sanitation!”.  Well yeah, we know that and BILLIONS have been thrown at it.  ... but how are you going to make it work? 

      It’s the greatest challenge this country faces.

    • Jase says:

      02:47pm | 24/10/11

      Completely reform welfare, to a system which is equal to all Australians, and does not favour any race. The key points to this policy would be.

      - Invalid & elderly pension remains as $x amount paid on a fortnightly. It must be means tested on the assets of the local family, that is that if the family can provide sufficient assistance, then they should do so, and that assistance can be taken out before tax from the family’s income either small amounts from all members or a large amount from one individual, the amount is capped at $x per fortnight so that the system cannot be screwed.

      - Unemployed benefits, paid for 6 weeks, after which if you have not found any form of employement, you are required to work for the state on community and infrastructure projects as labour. We start to employ these unemployed individuals in the council to clean rubbish, plant trees, and those who are deemed skilled enough can work on the construction/repair of roads etc. This system becomes legally exempt from normal employment laws, so that the wages are to remain the same as the unemployed pension, this will keep incentive to get employed elsewhere, and the system remains fluid. This apply’s to everyone, no exceptions.
      If you refuse to work or do not show, you do not get paid. The government will not let you starve, they will provide the absolute minimum in food vouchers and accommodation in a hostel type environment where we can house large amounts of people cheaply.

      - Baby bonus revoked, benefits for single parents remain, but are only paid on the first baby, there is no increase per baby. Means testing apply’s and the same family funded scheme apply’s as with the old age and invalid pension. This stops everyone breeding to improve the income of that family.

      - Capital gains tax is payable on all “land rights” payments, yes if its good enough to tax me on the sale of land, its good enough to tax them on it.

      - Austudy applies to everyone, abstudy is revoked. Means testing apply’s equally and the same scheme apply’s as per invalid and elderly pensions in terms of pre income tax assistance from families if they have sufficient means to provide it.

      - No benefits are to paid for employing an aboriginal over any other race,  it is either made illegal to make traineeships, apprenticeships etc available only to a aboriginal descendant or it is made legal to provide said programs for European only or Asian only descendants as well. Equality is exactly that, equality.
      This system would work very efficiently as it motivates people to work, even in the most medial jobs. Those who refuse to work have a safety net, but it is not the luxury safety net they currently have, its designed as exactly that a safety net for a short period of time.
      The emphasis on the family providing the assistance rather than the government if they have the means to do so, puts the accountability back on the family before the government for providing assistance, they way it is in Singapore. The benefits paid for by the family are tax free and reduce their taxable income so it provides incentive to do so, rather than negative gearing houses etc.
      It is not a complete system, but the fundamentals would work, it would not be popular because it would strip most the excess benefits away from people, but that is how welfare should be.

      If the Aboriginals want to live a traditional life in the middle of nowhere, then good luck to them. Under this system they could live it as they were 100’s of years ago, without any intervention from western culture, that means no alcohol, no drugs and no financial assistance.

      We should provide them with an area of land which can be established as a sovereign aboriginal state, perhaps a section of the Tanami Desert. They can chose to practice traditional law etc in that state and do as they please.

    • malohi says:

      06:36pm | 24/10/11

      get rid of the funding for remote communities. Get the problem closer to the solution instead of trying to bring the solution to the problem.
      If there were communes of any other race living in the middle of nowhere we would not be funding it. If they were rife with alcoholic violence, child abuse, rape, disease etc. You can guarentee they would be shut down asap.
      Either we expect a standard of living for all Australians we are prepared to enforce, or at least fund or we continue this great divide of the victms and their saviours
      If you want to live remote because of your “culture,” fund it yourself, we will see how many stick to their roots when the well runs dry.

      That is part of the solution.

    • Farken says:

      02:11pm | 24/10/11

      same old same old not one thing about how to fix it just sink the boot in . come on tell us what you think would fix it .

    • Deadman says:

      02:12pm | 24/10/11

      you are get close to racial vilification of white people

    • malohi says:

      06:40pm | 24/10/11

      Is that an ironic comment?
      If so, my hat off.
      If not, you are silly. Good day sir.

    • xar says:

      08:29pm | 25/10/11

      I don’t have the answers, I wish I did. People seem to propose stuff that either involves cultural whitewashing or things which have already been implemented with a massive failure rate.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @popculturechris: Meanwhile, Gotye holds no.1 for a sixth massive week in the US - "that" song has now sold over 4 million copies there.

ToryShepherd

@loupascale if the survey made you sad, probably skip the comments...

Paul Colgan

@paulwiggins @richardkendall that fountain pens yarn is a great social trend story

Paul Colgan

I like how a tip erodes so only you can use it MT “@paulwiggins: BBC News - Why are fountain pen sales rising? http://t.co/0hk2MRtf

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

When you take on a job like being Environment Minister there’s some hits you can see coming. …

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

Welcome to this week’s I Call Bullshit column. It’s a regular column that looks at skulduggery…

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

We are taught early in life that we should not question authority. We must listen to our parents, our…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter