What happened
Early this year, in the middle of the wettest La Nina summer in 40 years, a vast swathe of south-east Australia went underwater. Dozens of towns and larger centres were inundated in Victoria, Queensland and to a lesser extent New South Wales. At least 35 lives were lost in Queensland.

Ever tried hopping through 12 feet of flood water?

The flooding came in several waves. Large areas of regional Qld were inundated in December 2010, from the Darling Downs to the Burnett and beyond. When the second wave came in early January, it came even harder and faster, with devastating results.

The Toowoomba flash flood was the moment this event turned from a slow inundation best viewed from choppers to an outright disaster where destruction was both brutal and swift. The floodwaters cascaded from the crest of the Great Divide into the Lockyer Valley, where the impact on towns like Grantham was beyond belief.

Brisbane and Ipswich were next, with around 25,000 properties inundated. Ironically, much of the damage was worse than that inflicted by Cyclone Yasi up north a few weeks later, and it was a Category 5 storm.

Than a few days later, Victoria began to go under.

What happened next
In the immediate aftermath, we mourned the dead and celebrated the Australian spirit of mateship, which was writ large through the volunteers who chipped in with mops, brooms and pure muscle.

Then came two almighty stoushes, which continue to rumble along. The first concerned the release of water from Brisbane’s Wivenhoe Dam. The other fight involved ordinary householders and businesspeople versus the insurance industry. Some were covered by “flooding” but not “flash flooding”. Others had other problems with the fine print.

If one good thing comes from last summer’s inundation, let it be that the word “flood” on an insurance policy means any kind of inundation to a property. We’re not holding our breath.

Oh, and lest we forget the flood levy, which was mooted in late January and came into effect in July. We ain’t editorialising an inch on this one.

What we learned
That insurers are bastards, that excess water in Wivenhoe Dam should have been released earlier, and that when meteorologists warn of higher than normal sea temperatures in our northern waters (the main sign of a La Nina year), we should take them seriously.

Oh, and we learned and that our readers don’t like new taxes. Mind you, we learned that in about every third story this year.

How The Punch covered it
Before this wrap, we had 44 stories with the “Queensland Floods” tag. Often, natural disasters are difficult stories to cover for an opinion website, They are inherently newsy, non-opiniony stories.

This disaster was different, because of the levy, the Dam and god knows what else. You can click here and see the 44 stories for yourself. A few quick picks include Penbo on the humanity of Anna Bligh, that Rudd fella on the good eggs in Gen Y who helped out the victims, Nine’s Michael Usher defending the ethics of his Grantham coverage, and water expert Andrew Dragun on the Wivenhoe debacle,

They’re forecasting another La Nina summer. You all stay dry out there, you hear?

21 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Kerryn says:

      07:13am | 22/12/11

      I still can’t forget driving into Toowoomba and seeing the river that the CBD had become, and being scared for my friends in Withcott.  Seeing the Oakey Creek flowing all the way up to the bridge was an experience I’ll never forget either.  If I hadn’t stopped to get my siblings on the way from Oakey to Toowoomba…

    • nais says:

      07:41am | 22/12/11

      I happen to work for the insurance company where 98% of all flood claims in QLD and VIC in 2011 where paid out in full.  MOST insurers are bastards. Don’t lump the good guys in with the bad

    • Winston says:

      08:01am | 22/12/11

      Any hints on the company nais?

    • Mayday says:

      07:45am | 22/12/11

      Yes the La Nina event we knew was coming, it was well and truly advertised in news bulletins and yet the previous Labor Government in NSW went ahead with a very expensive desal plant.

      NSW definitely needs to spend money on infrastructure but this monster could have been put on the back burner for a few years and the money better spent on more pressing projects.

      The advice in regard to weather predictions was ignored because it suited the State ALP and yet their Federal counterparts are still blindly following the cult of “climate change.” 

      Go figure.
      If this stuff isn’t politically driven rather than based on factual scientific studies I’ll eat my organically grown cotton hat.

    • PW says:

      11:01pm | 22/12/11

      Much as I didn’t agree with the desal plant (and still don’t , would have rather a recycling plant), the fact is that Sydney was down to little more than 30% of its water supply. Nobody had any idea at all when the drought was going to break. Had the rains not come it would have been critical long before now. I can completely understand why they did it. I’m sure they would have loved to save the money but action was needed then and there.

    • Jane2 says:

      07:50am | 22/12/11

      Flood should not ever mean “any kind of inundation to property”. Why? Because there is a big difference between Toowoomba where it happened so fast that people didnt get out alive and Brisbane where people had days of warning so could have saved much of their stuff, which is different again from flooding resulting from a leaking roof.

      Floods are classified based on how much the owner can minimise lose to their own property.

      Sensible people, if their roof is leaking, move stuff out of the way of the leak and see to fixing or patching the leak.

      Sensible people, if their is slow rising flood water, load the car full of anything valuable and move everything that cant fit in the car to as high a place in the house as possible.

      In Toowoomba, people were too busy trying to get out alive to save anything.

      In terms of insurance, Toowoomba was fully covered, no arguements. Slow rising flood: damage to property covered, damage to personal belongings…not so much so unless you can prove you took action to minimise lose. Damage from leaking roof: Covered if you took action to prevent further damage by removing stuff from under the drip and fixing the roof.

      It is really simple and straight forward and I cant understand why people dont get it.

      Its like when your house gets burgled, if you leave the door open you arent covered at all even if you have been paying insurance.

    • Moi says:

      09:51am | 22/12/11

      Jane, what if those people are away on holidays, in hospital, caring for their elderly parents or are disabled? Your arguement is based soley on the assumption that everyone is at home and physically capable of moving all their possessions. It is based on the assumption that everyone has a car and somewhere to take their possessions to store until the flood passes. From what I understand many people were too busy trying to save their relatives or help those in dire need to have time to pack up their own belongings. What about those people in the SES who had to sacrifice protecting their own house and belongings to go help save the lives of others?  You need to think a bit more before you blame people. I’m sure if those people had a chance they would have saved as much as they could.

    • Matt says:

      11:55am | 22/12/11

      In Brisbane, I moved all my furniture and valuables upstairs and moved out for the duration of the flood. Water came into my house, ruined my floor, walls etc which all needed to be replaced. According to your uninformed story above, insurance should have paid out, but it didn’t. Why? Because apparently my house flooded because the drains overflowed, not because of the river flooding. Despite the fact that the drains were full and had nowhere to drain to because of the flooded river.
      If you don’t fully understand what you are talking about, don’t insult people who were victims of an unfortunate event and greedy deceitful insurance companies.

    • Jane says:

      07:56am | 22/12/11

      By the by. This year is proving to be wetter and busier for the SES than last year.

      In NSW, we have many teams who are spending Christmas away from family and friends, to help other communities.

      If you are driving this Christmas period, stay out of flood water. Anything deeper than ankle depth with a current is enough to wash a car of a road.

    • Mahhrat says:

      08:05am | 22/12/11

      I would like to point out that fantastic effectiveness of our emergency services and society at large that ONLY 35 people died in this tragedy.

      I shudder to think how many we’d have lost otherwise.

    • thatmosis says:

      08:26am | 22/12/11

      Sure made a fool of our beloved Climate Commissioner Flannery didnt it but then again he didnt need much help did he , ooh, am I allowed to say that or will the thought police decend upon me and try to silence me.. And look further afield at Victoria where the ex labor government went la la on the advice of the warmists and built, or tried to build a Desalination Plant that is now behind in construction and costing the tax payers billions on overruns. Then of course we have the Queensland effort also built on the advice that there would never be enough rain to fill the dams again ever and is siitng there rusting away and we have a lesson in stupidity that we should all learn from but unfortunatley some will still cling to the idea that the sky is falling.

    • Momar "Moe" Szyslak says:

      10:26am | 22/12/11

      Perhaps it did moe
      But, I don’t remember Flannery ever saying their would never be hurricanes and floods. Perhaps you could point me at where he said this?

      Desalination? I agree, Australia will never be in drought again ...ever.
      Is this your prediction moe, or did you get your information from the liberal party website?

      Dams not needed? Perhaps you missed the bit where they should have been letting water out way before they did.

      The only thing falling here, is your credibility.

    • Tony H says:

      10:54am | 22/12/11

      Flannery is nothing but another green carpetbagger. His alternative energy company received $90m in taxpayer funds for no results. I wonder how much of that $90m he paid to himself in directors fees and then I wonder if my taxes paid for the absolute waterfront home he bought in northern Sydney recently. Yes indeed, after warning of catastrophic sea level rises he buys a house literally metres from the water.

    • Stay in school kids. says:

      12:46pm | 22/12/11

      Tony H - Using talk back shows for your evidence there mate? tsk tsk.

    • Mormon says:

      12:47pm | 22/12/11

      thatmosis, thought police? no. Moron police, getting closer.

    • Tony H says:

      01:30pm | 22/12/11

      Stay in school kid, are you saying Flannery doesn’t have a house at Coba Point metres from the water? Or that he isn’t a director of Geodynamics? Or saying that company didn’t receive $90m of taxpayers money in 2009 and produced no successful results? Which one?

    • Stay in school kids says:

      03:14pm | 22/12/11

      The part about the waterfront property. Its above the sea level by more than his catastrophic rise prediction.

    • idiocracy says:

      10:47am | 22/12/11

      thatmosis you are so right - scientists are all vested interest leeches looking for grant money and shouldn’t be listened to by us mortals - we know whats best - who needs years and years of education in the field? Any thought of planning for the future is a distraction from maximizing our current consumption, what a stupid idea that is.

    • Alice says:

      02:59pm | 22/12/11

      For anyone looking for good flood cover, I can’t speak highly enough of Westpac.  Our house flooded and they covered absolutely everything without question.  Not once did they try to weasel out of anything.  Their policy rates were also very reasonable, and still are despite increasing this year.  It really is an excellent policy, and the PDS states that they cover ‘all kinds of flood, including…’  (ie no exlusions whatsoever, which is why I chose their policy).

    • PW says:

      11:13pm | 22/12/11

      If you are living on land that is flood prone, and your insurer is covering you for this at a “very reasonable” cost, it sounds like you are being subsidised by other policyholders whose homes will never flood.

      If you live somewhere that floods once in 30 years (like the banks of the Brisbane River) and a flood costs $150,000, thats $5,000 per year before you even start. Methinks the poor bugger on top of the hill is paying a hefty premium for an event that will never happen.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @popculturechris: Meanwhile, Gotye holds no.1 for a sixth massive week in the US - "that" song has now sold over 4 million copies there.

ToryShepherd

@loupascale if the survey made you sad, probably skip the comments...

Paul Colgan

@paulwiggins @richardkendall that fountain pens yarn is a great social trend story

Paul Colgan

I like how a tip erodes so only you can use it MT “@paulwiggins: BBC News - Why are fountain pen sales rising? http://t.co/0hk2MRtf

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

When you take on a job like being Environment Minister there’s some hits you can see coming. …

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

Welcome to this week’s I Call Bullshit column. It’s a regular column that looks at skulduggery…

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

We are taught early in life that we should not question authority. We must listen to our parents, our…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter