What happened
On March 23 some 2000 to 3000 people gathered in Federation Mall in front of Parliament House in Canberra to protest against the Government’s carbon pricing policy. This No Carbon Tax rally was the first demonstration in the national capital of a grassroots opposition to the policy, a protest movement Opposition Leader Tony Abbott had been attempting to marshall.

The 'Democracy is Dead' coffin at a follow up rally in September. Picture: Ray Strange

The event’s aim was overwhelmed by the starkly hostile and sexist signs and placards wielded by the demonstrators. Prime Minister Julia Gillard was called “JuLIAR,” as pioneered by 2GB broadcaster Alan Jones.

She was called a “bitch’’ and a “witch” and speakers at the rally reflected the tone of the signs held by listeners. Government MPs were furious, particularly women, and the rally was condemned from Labor benches in Parliament during Question Time. Tony Abbott spoke from the protest platform and embarrassingly was photographed in front of a sign reading “JuLIAR Gillard…Bob Browns (sic) Bitch”.

What happened next

The rally was followed up by a number of noisy, not-particularly-well-controlled rallies in state capitals, including another couple in Canberra.

The Convoy of No Confidence, a protest movement of truckies from around Australia that hit Canberra on August 22, was better organised. The nastier signs were banned and it involved a smaller crowd.

This protest hit a snag when master of ceremonies Alan Jones claimed police had prevented hundreds of trucks from entering Canberra. That was untrue, and it damaged the credibility of what Transport Minister Anthony Albanese in Parliament called the “Convoy of No Consequence”.

The Axe the Tax mob took revenge on September 1 by marching on Mr Albanese’s electorate office in Marrickville, Sydney, carrying protest signs including one which read: “Tolerance is our demise”. Mr Albanese came out and spoke to the group of about 300, and the video of the occasion soon became hugely popular online, mainly because of the antics of the protesters.

What we learned

The rally in Canberra showed that the No Carbon Tax campaign was being run by enthusiastic amateurs, some of whom seemed to have adopted the style of their shock-jock favourites who saw no insult as a step too far.

The No Carbon Tax organisers found they could get a national audience, and heavyweight endorsement from the Coalition, by lining up outside Parliament House.

How the Punch covered it

We’ve been all over the Democracy is Dead protesters this year. We kicked off our coverage by pointing out that with their “Juliar” rhetoric, protesters were playing the woman, not the tax.

A follow up rally in September was nothing but a carbon freak show, wrote Ant Sharwood:

If democracy is so dead, just remind us again why a rally organised by government opponents was allowed to happen on the lawns outside the seat of power?

And when the Convoy of No Confidence hit Canberra, Daniel Piotrowski told the story of why one truckie, for better or for worse, chose to whittle away $10k to travel from Perth to Parliament House to protest. Meet Gordon Crawford.

The Sunday before last, Gordon Crawford, the CEO of a five-truck Perth furniture removal company, sat down with his wife to make an unusual investment decision.

Gordon had just received an email from a mate telling him about the “Convoy of No Confidence”, a platoon of truckie convoys travelling from across the country to Canberra to call for a new election. A convoy was leaving Perth that Thursday. Did Gordon want to be a part of it?

Gordon had a right to have his voice heard. But his voice was scarcely heard because of the shock jock tactics of other protesters.

Most commented

49 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Erick says:

      04:47am | 13/12/11

      Thank you for presenting the Labor Party’s viewpoint of the Carbon Tax rallies. It’s pretty predictable.

      What’s also predictable is the difference between The Punch’s almost entirely negative coverage of these events, and its positive coverage of the equally fringe-driven Occupy movement. The reasons for this lie mostly in the left-leaning personal beliefs of most journalists.

    • Nathan says:

      06:48am | 13/12/11

      “The reasons for this lie mostly in the left-leaning personal beliefs of most journalists” but they work for mostly right leaning publications. Look at what the Australian puts out and tell me they are left leaning.

      The media in this country is fairly neutral so i don’t get it when either side think they are getting the wrong end of the stick. I am sure you can subscribe to Fox news though probably more your speed.

    • TChong says:

      07:01am | 13/12/11

      EricK
      Mals POV is just as valid as Sophie Mirabellas pro rally article.
      After all , it is an opinion site.
      BTW, you dont believe an employee should be bound to the obvios political views ( very obvios with RM ) of the employer ?
      Freedom of speech and ideas is to be applauded, no ?

    • SpagBol says:

      08:38am | 13/12/11

      Yeah, damn them for evaluating the situation and writing their opinions about the movements in question. It would only be fair, just and neutral if they agreed with you, otherwise they’re LEFTIES!

    • John says:

      08:57am | 13/12/11

      I beg to differ! Tony Abbott talking at a Democracy is dead presentation is laughable. Switching from party 1 to 2 isn’t going change anything because it’s not the politicians that hold power, but the world finance and the media owners. Before anyone can be president and prime minister they must get the approval of world finance and media owners, if they are not approved the media will go and dig up dirt and methodically destroy their character. If you believe in western democracy you clearly have been duped.

    • Blind Freddy says:

      09:02am | 13/12/11

      @Erick

      Take the advice that TimB always gives lefties that complain of media bias- buy a newspaper or start a web site of your own, or shut up - you big sook!

      That’s right aint it TimB?

    • Chris L says:

      09:12am | 13/12/11

      Erick, I can remember reading Punch articles about how vague and directionless the Occupy movement in Australia was. I’m sure I recall you adding your own comments to these.

    • Little Joe says:

      09:26am | 13/12/11

      I am starting to understand why my “Counter-Punch Stories” never get published. Where are the facts??

      1) Julia lied!!!
      2) Swan lied!!!
      3) Many other Labor MP’s lied!!!
      4) Swan said it would be revenue neutral. (Swan lied again!!!)
      5) Carbon Tax raises $27B worth of taxes but spends $31B ...... there is another $4B to add to the deficit!!!
      6) Literally none of the Carbon Tax goes to renewables infrastructure.
      7) Most of the money raised by the Carbon Tax will subsidise people or businesses who would not need subsidising if there was no carbon tax or spent on a ministry that would not be there if there wasn’t a Carbon Tax.
      8) The Government will then spend another unfunded $3B on research ...... and people wonder why scientists are so actively warning everyone about climate change.
      9) The Government will then spend another unfunded $10B on subsidising renewables programs .... and people wonder why Dan Cass writes for the punch.

    • Blind Freddy says:

      09:56am | 13/12/11

      @Little Joe

      I suspect it has more to do with your use of baseless ideological polemic - oh, and a tendency to overdo the exclaimation mark!!!!!!

    • TimB says:

      10:04am | 13/12/11

      Actually Freddy, I give that advice to people who complain that News Ltd has too much control over the media, and thus think that News Ltd should be restricted or censored in some fashion. So no, you aren’t right at all.

      Erick has neither called for censorship nor any other kind of restrictions. He’s merely pointed out the blatantly obvious leanings of News.com.au’s so-called national political editor.
      And whilst I can’t claim to speak for Erick, at a guess I would say he’s quite happy to counter that bias with his own comments, rather than feeling the need to create a whole new media outlet.

      As Tim Blar likes to point out, the right prefers lefties to keep talking (so they can be justifiably ridiculed, but the left want conservatives to shut up.

    • Little Joe says:

      10:22am | 13/12/11

      @ Blind Freddy

      You can either accept what is written (Do I really have to reference every piece of common knowledge that I write?), dispute what is written (Are your really going to put forward some baseless arguement to discredit what I have written so that it may be shot down) or put your head in the sand!!! You have shown your ignorance by opting for the later!!!

    • Martin says:

      12:26pm | 13/12/11

      @Erick

      Funny that the Punch’s most predictable troll should be complaining about predictability. As predictable as Alan Jones and his rabid right wing followers who comment here, and Tony Abbott saying ... well, we all know what he always says.

    • Super D says:

      04:48am | 13/12/11

      I think the final lesson of the carbon tax is yet to be learned.  Namely that you can’t pull off that sort of monumental backflip (the kindest possible description) and hope to be re-elected.  You can write the obituaries for the Gillard government already.

    • Triptic says:

      09:07am | 13/12/11

      Bby all means, write whatever obituaries you want if they makes you feel better and keeps the dummy in your mouth.
      Another tactic would be to stick your head in the sand and pretend you’re not part of the right wing fringe.

    • Super D says:

      09:45am | 13/12/11

      right wing fringe lol

    • RyaN says:

      02:21pm | 13/12/11

      @Super D: Yep you and the rest of Australia are all part of the right wing fringe!

    • acotrel says:

      05:01am | 13/12/11

      Where is your sense of humour ?  Surely you must laugh when Tony Abbott calls somebody else a liar ?  Watch him on TV and take note of his face, eye movements and body language when he speaks, rather than just listening to his words.

    • Samantha says:

      07:02am | 13/12/11

      acotrel watching Gillard walk around with her fat arse and talking like a bogan pretending to be PM is much funnier, actually that picture of you on the ALP website is even funnier.

    • TimB says:

      07:27am | 13/12/11

      Is anyone else suprised to hear that Acotrel spends his time just staring at Tony Abbott on his TV screen?

      Acotrel, the dude is happily married. Time for you to move on.

    • Alf says:

      07:56am | 13/12/11

      @acotrel. You don’t need to read Gillard’s body language when she lies. It comes out crystal clear - for all to hear.

    • TChong says:

      08:17am | 13/12/11

      Alf
      what did Abbott concede about his level of honesty?
      Something about not trusting what he says , unless written, and then, only maybe ?
      You do recall that, dont you Alf?

    • Watchin' says:

      08:31am | 13/12/11

      acotrel, what do you think someone might surmise about you and your mental state from observing you?

    • TimB says:

      08:53am | 13/12/11

      He didn’t say that at all Chongy. Go back and check the record.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      10:18am | 13/12/11

      @TimB

      TChong is just calling his bluff.

      Abbott don’t trust anything I say unless it written down, or if you want policies read my book battlelines.

      Will be an interesting election I think, two leaders both hated equally as much and when Abbott will have to put up policies to be voted on.

    • Martin says:

      12:33pm | 13/12/11

      Abbott lies whether it’s spoken or written down. Remember the agreement he signed with the Independents about pairing the Speaker? He tore it up and threw it in our faces, but that came back to haunt him when Harry Jenkins gave the Government the numbers. It was worth as much as the scrap of paper Abbott signed during the election campaign claiming that Workchoices was dead, buried and cremated. Yeah, right.

    • Against the Man says:

      05:03am | 13/12/11

      First half of 2012 will be Gillard overwhelmed by the refugee situation, and when things look to settle down the second half of the year will be carbon tax rage. Looks like 2012 is going to be hell for the Gillard mob. And that isn’t counting the other problems they have and will have and of course the newly enraged KRudd! wink

    • Anubis says:

      08:29am | 13/12/11

      AtM - Craig Thomson will rear his ugly little head again in 2012. The Police Investigation should be completed some time in the first half and either the thieving little toe rag will be forced to resign or he will be excorted off the premises in hand cuffs. Another headache for Gillard there.

      C’mon Punch print this - your software has “lost” the last few comments made about Thomson this month. Is this censorship or software glitches?

    • Chris L says:

      09:20am | 13/12/11

      @Anubis - Don’t get your hopes up. Even if found guilty of a crime doesn’t mean the end of a political career. Mary Jo Fisher is still around after being found guilty of assault (although that one can’t be classed as a Labor conspiracy).

    • nossy says:

      09:34am | 13/12/11

      @Against the Man   meanwhile back in the Policy desert that is todays Liberal Party ATM DR NO has promised in 2012 to “come up with a policy”! Strewth we all wait with baited breath.  hahahahhah Ohhhhhh how sweet it is ATM!

    • Flexo says:

      11:05am | 13/12/11

      @ nossy, Gillard has said NO to gay marriage, NO to the Nauru solution, and thanks to her we have refugees bombarding our country. Also her cabinet reshuffle is seen as a bribe to keep her cronies loyal. What is really sweet is that Gillard is destroying Labor in a way the LNPcould never have. HeeHee Like you said too sweet!

    • Duh says:

      12:40pm | 13/12/11

      @ flexo

      Refugees have bombs ?

    • Samantha says:

      07:03am | 13/12/11

      NO carbon Tax for Australia! What part of that did you not understand Julia?

    • Chris L says:

      09:22am | 13/12/11

      Perhaps the part about being committed to a carbon PRICE for Australia. After all, a lot of the electorate seem to be confused by that.

    • Anubis says:

      10:59am | 13/12/11

      @ Chris L - Yes Chris. That committment involved a plan to spend this term of Government developing a widely accepted plan for Carbon pricing, reaching a consensus following consultation with a people’s Forum and then presenting the policy and plan of implementation at the next election. The words “There will be no Carbon Tax under a Government I lead were quite clear and unequivocal. Wayne Swan, when asked prior to the election if they were going to implement a Carbon Tax shoudl they form Government stated “Any one who thinks we will do that are seriously deluded” He then went on to detail the consensus plan to develop policy to be presented at the next election.

      Clearly lied and deliberately misinformed in order to garner those few extra votes they needed. The speed with which they put forward the Carbon Tax after the election has nothing to do with changed circumstances or hung parliament but every thing to do with the fact that, whilst denying it, they intended to put it in place regardless.

      Gillard, Swan and every other Labor politician who were asked about this deliberately misled the Australian voters. That is an unavoidable fact, no matter how the Labor rusties wish to twist it.

    • Chris L says:

      01:11pm | 13/12/11

      I don’t want to argue too much over this, Anubis, as I am ambivalent toward the carbon price myself. However, to say the changes made (fixed price for three years instead of one, no people’s assembly) cannot be due to the hung parliament because it happened so soon after the election doesn’t seem right. The hung parliament happened during the election and it was her negotiations with all parties that allowed Gillard to form a government without us having to return to the polls.

      Gillard and Swann were emphatic about no tax, probably because everything they did incurred the “great big new tax on everything” soundbite, and it wasn’t meant to be a tax (still isn’t) but a carbon price (which they didn’t explain very well for the voters). I can see that as a pretty big mistake they made and I can see how this lead to people getting a different impression, but for myself I was entirey unsurprised when the price was announced. To me, what we’re getting is not much different from what was promised.

    • RJB says:

      07:42am | 13/12/11

      So predictable to have Farr twirling the baton for the Labor party, obviously “he is them” or was that “we are us” or whatever.

    • Chris L says:

      01:15pm | 13/12/11

      “If I’m not me, den who da hell am I?” - Total Recall

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      02:58pm | 13/12/11

      Doesn’t want to do himself out of all those long wet lunches courtesy of the ALP spin doctors

    • Michael says:

      08:04am | 13/12/11

      Malcolm, Alan Jones wasn’t the one who was heavily involved with the first protest on March 23. That was his 2GB colleague, Chris Smith. Alan was heavily involved with the less successful Convoy Of No Confidence. I attended the first rally and unlike what the media portrayed, I am not a dinosaur! I’m 26 years old and genuinely concerned for the future of our country.

    • Lezza says:

      08:10am | 13/12/11

      Is there some weird point behind the Punch allowing posters to use offensive language?
      Do people like Samantha think it’s clever to do so?
      Moronic is a word that springs to mind.
      One wonders how Samantha would react [provided of course that we’re talking about a female] if someone spoke about any part of her body in such insulting language.

    • Aitch B says:

      09:46am | 13/12/11

      @Lezza

      You would prefer ‘behind’, ‘bottom’, ‘derriere’, ‘rear’, ‘tush’ or something like that?

      Surely you can’t be complaining about the ‘fat’ part…. it IS that! smile

    • Michael says:

      12:00pm | 13/12/11

      Calling someone moronic is an insult to their intelligence ergo their brain, a part of the body.

      Some would advocate do unto others whatever you perceive them to be doing, whilst criticising them for having done it. smile

      Enjoy who you are, or just project it onto someone else and hate the shit out of it smile

    • RyaN says:

      02:28pm | 13/12/11

      @Lezza: I guess you must have missed all those posts where insults were thrown around about Tony Abbotts appearance then?

      Hypocrite is as hypocrite does.

    • stanleyG says:

      06:24pm | 13/12/11

      l most certainly agree some of the placards at the no carbon tax rally were in extremely poor taste and they portray their holders in a bad light. l also thought that Steve Gibbons comparing people who dont agree with the carbon tax to members of the KKK equally deplorable.Any reason this disgraceful comment by a politician from the left was’‘nt mentioned in the article? And could we please have a new years resolution from journos to stop using the unoriginal,unimaginative term’ ‘’‘shock jocks’‘?

    • Lurch says:

      01:22am | 14/12/11

      I would rather see a few relatively harmless signs instead of 100 MUA members. led by one Greg Combet if I remember correctly, storm the front doors of parliament house like spoilt children!
      Wait, according to Mr Combet it was ok because they were protesting!
      Only one thing worse than an hypocrite and thats an elected hypocrite!

    • BASSMAN says:

      10:06am | 14/12/11

      Erick says:

      05:47am | 13/12/11…...and what side does Pierce Akerman give day after day? Never sween a pro Labor column from him yet. Get real!!

    • Dan Cass says:

      04:09pm | 19/12/11

      Much relieved to find that there is a plausible conspiracy theory to explain why I write for The Punch.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

David Penberthy

@KevCorduroy @SallyHitchiner it's a great idea I doubt he'd go for it though far too laid back

ToryShepherd

. @mcguiremi is journo of the year! #samediaawards

ToryShepherd

.@mariamosco @msmarto Super Smarto. And Shirley Stott Despoja into the Hall of Fame #samediaawards

ToryShepherd

Best print journo to @mcguiremi woot! #samediaawards

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter