A woman does not have to be a man to succeed in business. And it only appears to be a hell of a lot easier if you are. You can’t argue with the statistics.

Sure they're succesful, but very few women are up for the sacrafices that come with having a position of power. Photo:

Women are poorly represented in positions of power.

But conceding the premise that the number of women in executive positions is dismal does not logically lead to the conclusion that you have to be a man to do well.

For a start, success is not synonymous with power.

Success is no more and no less than achieving what you want to achieve. To succeed is to personally triumph. And not in some saccharine, Kumbaya kind of way. It’s about getting what you really want.

Do women want to be on the boards of ASX-listed companies? Are they dreaming of that chief executive officer position? Some are. Most are not.

I’ve seen corporate Australia up close, and it stinks.  (Quick disclaimer here – I’ve had over 30 jobs, mostly in the corporate sphere, so I’m talking about them, not my current employer). It stinks of sweaty armpits, cold coffee, and desperation.

Getting to the top in business means knowing how to schmooze and suck, how to stab someone in the back then trample over their still-warm body. Secret handshakes and betrayal, dib dib dib, dob dob dob.

Executive meetings are inherently manly. They’re about sitting around and discussing the length of your experience and the girth of your experience.

Let’s look at what is, now, a typical executive.

Chances are he’s male. Chances are also that he’s overweight from scoffing stale biscuits and being chained to his desk. He’s probably got high blood pressure, a cupboard full of Viagra and a looming premature death. Is that success?

I did a quick and admittedly unscientific poll of women I know and the resounding response to what they want in the workplace was for it to be as easy for women to be in charge as it is for men.

However, being the top boss was not what they wanted for themselves.

What they want is a job where they can be creative and flexible, with some responsibility but not so much that it keeps them awake at night.

They want life choices. They do want more money, but not at the expense of their mental and physical health, and certainly not at the expense of their family life.

So, a substantial chunk of women are succeeding in business in this way: by finding the roles that fulfill them at different levels within a company.  They are getting what they want; they are successful even if they are not all powerful.

But there is another substantial chunk of women who want to be the top boss. And the existing power structures make that harder for women.

Feminists fought hard to get my generation all the rights we take for granted. The right to drink in bars, to do whatever jobs we want, to get a bank loan. And we are eternally grateful.

But the business world is still, fundamentally, structured to give men the leg up.

Deserving women are failing, often, to rise to the top. There are ongoing issues with the glass ceiling, often linked to the issues involving the pelvic floor.

But, again, women are finding a way to succeed. They just have to sidestep out of the traditional corporate world.

They are starting their own businesses, in the real world and online, and the companies they are creating are growing with them at the helm.

So, that takes care of a bunch more women who are succeeding in businesses – their own business.

But we also need to talk about why women who want to get to the top within the traditional business models, those ASX companies, are not succeeding, because it is true that many are not.

It’s a common misconception that corporate Australia rewards stereotypically manly attributes.

But, according to many recent studies on workplace success, it’s not being a man that helps you succeed. It’s psychopathic tendencies.

Psychopaths are aggressive, but often charming when they need to be.

They are cunning and lacking in remorse or empathy. They don’t feel guilt. They have no problems discrediting or outright sabotaging those who get in their way.

They are willing to do whatever it takes to climb the ladder, so they are the ones who rise highest, fastest.

Psychopaths are more common than you think – about one in 100 people are psychopathic. But in management the figure is much higher – more than one in 10. And that’s just the ones who are clinically diagnosable.

Corporate psychopaths can coldly, ruthlessly manipulate those around them for their own gain.

And experts say today’s businesses actively select for psychopathic traits. Those who will “do whatever it takes” to get the job done, those who “play to win” .
Look at which companies are in the ASX 200. It’s the big banks, oil companies.

They demand ruthlessness. They demand psychopathy.

And it just happens that men are four times more likely to be psychopaths. So you don’t have to be a man to succeed in business. But you might want to look at developing a dangerous mental disorder.

In summary: Women are already succeeding in business in traditional ways. But they are also succeeding in other ways; by finding a sustainable and fulfilling niche in the workplace, by creating their own workplace.

And where women are failing to fill the same proportions of the high-flying corporate world as men, it’s not because they have to be men to succeed, it’s because they are, generally, less likely to be psychopaths.

*This is an extract from a speech Tory gave at the Don Dunstan Foundation debate earlier this week.

Most commented

44 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Super D says:

      06:56am | 05/11/10

      Not sure where you are heading with this one.  First up a claim that the stats don’t lie and therefore there are obstacles preventing women ascending to high office in the corporate world.

      This is then followed by the stark admission that when it comes to being interested in ascending to corporate leadership “Some are. Most are not.”

      This to some degree invalidates your claim, looking at raw numbers, that men dominate women due to unseen obstacles.  A better statistic would be to look at the proportion of women achieving corporate ledership versus those in middle management that aspire to it.  This could be compared to the same measure for men and then you would have a meaningful comparison.

      It may even show that in proportional terms women who are interested are actually more likely to succeed. 

      Oh and then claiming its because men are psychos and women aren’t and thats why men have managed to get ahead.  I’ve met plenty of psycho chicks so all you are really arguing is that men channel it better and that somehow overcoming a mental dysfunction is a bad thing….

    • Macca says:

      07:03am | 05/11/10

      I really don’t think I agreed with a single thought of this article other than success is acheiving what you want.

      Bashing Males Executives as overweight from scoffing biscuits and on their way to a premature death is pretty offensive, as is the comparison to Psychopaths.

    • DG says:

      07:51am | 05/11/10

      Agree entirely

      As a male who is not a psychopath, who has no desire to “play the game” to get to a job I hate, surrounded by people I don’t like and chained to a desk that is a symbol of my wasted life and who wants to have family life, I have, more than once been looked at as a failure. It is assumed that I “want to get to the top”, but “don’t have what it what it takes”.

      Really, I don’t want to get to the top. I don’t want to earn a million bucks a year. If I won lotto I would want to win nothing more than the amount to pay off my house and buy a car. I could quite contentedly sit at the same desk day in and day out for the next 40 years - provided the position still offers me reasonable income and time to spend with my family and loved ones.

      Meanwhile, I work opposite a young lady who is dedicated, motivated and wants to get to the top. Good for her - there is no hindrance to her getting what she wants, she just has to make the same sacrifices that any one else would have to make - sacrifice time with the family and friends, sacrifice relaxation and holidays.

      The reason that they have to make these sacrifices isn’t because “that’s’ what it takes”, but because there are only so many places at the top and some of those people want it so badly that they will sacrifice everything else. If you want to compete with them you need to be willing to make the same sacrifices. It’s not about your anatomy, but your willingness to make sacrifices, to pay the price, to compete.

      Me, I’ll be at the same desk 20 years from now - while a dozen or more will have passed through the desk opposite - each looking to improve their position. Sure, I wont have the money or prestige they have - hopefully, I’ll have what I want “a wife, kids, house in the ‘burbs and playing footy on the weekends”.

      I’m willing to sacrifice my career for that.

    • acotrel says:

      09:21am | 05/11/10

      DG, you are right about ‘playing the game’.  My son is a well qualified and competent mechanical engineer.  He manages several projects for a major construction company.  One of his subordinates, older than him, believed ‘playing the game’ involved a level of harassment.  He rubbished my son to all and sundry, and used to grab him in a head lock on numerous occasions.  My son is the sort of person, you name your game, and he’ll beat you at it. The moron came along and did the headlock thing, and my son hit him only once, breaking three of his ribs.  Now he’s a very good friend!  Of course after that there were mumblings about anger management from the chief.  But considering my son would have walked away with most of the customer base, the sounds of silence prevailed.

    • McGraw says:

      10:58am | 05/11/10

      DG

      A successful man is one who earns more than his wife can spend

    • Cate P says:

      09:06pm | 06/11/10

      DG you haven’t sacrificed your career, you have made living a full, balanced and happy life your career.  My husband is the same, and more power to you, real mature men.  You are prepared to sacrifice much for the right things - love and family.  There’s lots of you out here, believe me, bringing their kids to school sometimes, coaching the kids’ sports teams, being there for assemblies and special family times.  There are lots of things more important and more satisfying than climbing the corporate ladder and I’m glad men areat last discovering what some women have known for years.

    • southernX says:

      08:02am | 05/11/10

      “They want life choices. They do want more money, but not at the expense of their mental and physical health, and certainly not at the expense of their family life.”

      Sadly, for men, the pressures to do just that are significant - the foundation of attractiveness to women is based largely on power and wealth, and you get that by working bloody hard.  Women are lucky - they have a choice.  They can either do the above and be successful, or use other facets (beauty, charm) to attract a long term partner.  Very few men have that choice.

      *steps back and waits for the shouting to start*

    • Maria C says:

      11:25am | 05/11/10

      Maybe you are dating the wrong women…
      I know it is probably a small proportion, but it is growing, of my friends where the male partner is staying home or working part time to be with the kids. Admittedly these women are lawyers, doctors and high level corporate types, but it works for them.
      I think we also need to address that issue though, women are not the only ones constrained by stereotypes. Men are largely judged on the work they do/the position the hold/the money they earn. All of these societal constraints need to end so that people can make meaningful choices about what they want for their life.

    • Lisa H. says:

      06:40pm | 06/11/10

      I agree that women have a wider variety of strategies at their disposal for sexual success.
      But ultimately, most women find that they must agree to settle or ‘match’ the lifestyle that their man wishes to lead.
      Top desk or weekends free for sport… in many ways that is entirely up to you.
      Having a tradional family lifestyle myself, I sometimes envy my husband’s ability to ‘knock off’ on weekends, while I catch up on my ‘second shift’ of laundry, cleaning and never-ending household chores.
      To succeed in business, women need a ‘wife’ just as much as any ambitious business man… and that is probably an important missing element for the exhausted female executive.

    • Tim says:

      08:03am | 05/11/10

      Is this article for real?
      So women want to get paid more money, but don’t want too much responsibility?
      They want to be in charge, but don’t want their family life to suffer?
      They want to succeed in business, but don’t want to develop the necessary skills to do so?

      Oh…  can I play this game too?

      I want to be given my boss’ job, but I don’t want my golf game to suffer.
      I want to be paid more money, but I still want to be able to take every second day off work if I feel like it.

    • Tory Shepherd says:

      09:53am | 05/11/10

      Exactly, Tim. It’s a matter of prioritising and working out what you’re willing to sacrifice to get what you want.

      Not sure where you got the “don’t want to develop the necessary skills” to succeed in business bit from, though.

    • Tim says:

      11:09am | 05/11/10

      Probably the psychopathic skills that you mention Tory.

      It explains a lot about all the bosses i’ve had, even the female ones.

    • Sarah says:

      08:36am | 05/11/10

      This article is confusing and idiotic and I think I am the first female to say that. At the start it seems like you are going to show that women can get to the top job but they don’t want to (I agree with that) but than you talk about psychos? I don’t understand that. Men desire to get the top job otherwise they are going to be a beta male instead of the alpha. Getting to the top job means so much more, it means increasing your chances with getting a partner and being able to show your new car off to the mates. I don’t want to do that, my boyfriend thinks I am attractive in my underwear (which is a lot easier than getting the top job) and I dont care about one upping other people with cars. Girls one up each other by showing how much better their relationship or social life is than the other. We naturally do things differently and our physiological features are scientific back up to this claim.
      P.S I think feminists have gone way to far, they had a good cause but it had objectives, those objectives have been achieved, so give it a rest!

    • fairsfair says:

      09:14am | 05/11/10

      I second that PS - It should be framed or put on some T-shirts.

    • Lisa H. says:

      07:02pm | 06/11/10

      Er, I don’t want to one-up other females by showing off my legs, my husband, my friends or my kids.
      So where do I fit in?
      Maybe I’ll redecorate my house?

      There are still very strong pressures on men not to ‘lose’ to a woman, in work life and personally. Men will be very competitive. The reality of dependent family-members pushes men to strive (and take all the credit in joint projects) in a way that women are often not pushed.

      Personally, I love and appreciate that my husband works so hard. His stamina is inspiring. I support him in his work as much as I can, financially, intellectually, and in the prioritising of his work lifestyle. Crucially, though, if I did not ‘co-operate’, I doubt my relationship would be as happy as it is.

      My man can continue to take all the credit (and, ultimately, the pressure of responsibility for the choices we make), as long as he unselfishly shares the spoils of our joint effort in his work!

      It’s a system that has worked very well for many generations!

    • ibast says:

      08:43am | 05/11/10

      Wow Tory, there’s some real mixed messages here.  You’ve concluded that generally women don’t want to run for the top jobs, yet the statistics prove that there is bias against women getting those job.

      No, the statistics prove your point that women generally don’t want those top job.

      My experience is that women are slightly favored to get into middle management roles, due to gender balancing policies, but it is their life decisions that see them (in general) go no further.

      As your article points out there are healthy reasons for that, but the gender bias line (against women) is just not true in this country.

    • fairsfair says:

      09:08am | 05/11/10

      As a female can I just say that I am sick and tired of this kind of discussion. Women - if you want something in life, go out and get it. Words cannot express how rediculous it is to still have a victim mentality and pull the “I didn’t get it because I am a girl” card in 2010. My word I feel like flykicking my computer right now. We are out own worst enemy. Grow the F* up.

    • Tory Shepherd says:

      09:56am | 05/11/10

      Hey, fairsfair - that’s exactly the point. Success is getting what you want. Not sure who’s saying “I didn’t get it because I am a girl”. Looks like you’ve set yourself up a little straw man there.

      But you go ahead and flykick the computer if if makes you feel better!

    • fairsfair says:

      10:56am | 05/11/10

      Tory I encounter “I didn’t get it/can’t do because I am a girl” every day.  I guess I was pre-empting the response of all the radical feminists out there, but they don’t appear to awake this morning. I don’t doubt that they are coming though. Women (and people for that matter) who fail to achive their dreams in life do so because of the demands they place on themselves and the victim mentality. They set themselves up for failure and then blame anything and everything as to not recognise that they just weren’t good enough (harsh reality of aspects of life that we should all realise). Women aren’t good at sacrificing every aspect of their lives for career (refer Sarah’s comments above). There are more men willing to do so therefore they are better represented by the statistics.

      Oh and I do apologise - my grow the F* up is directed at those women out there who use gender issues in 2010 as an excuse. It was not directed to you as the author.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      09:19am | 05/11/10

      I think you mean sociopath. The link between business executives and sociopathy has been well documented. Psychopathy is a different kettle of fish and is more likely to be found in terrorists than in big business (unless you are working at Blackwater or something….)

    • Tory Shepherd says:

      09:58am | 05/11/10

      Nup, Shane - definitely meant psychopath. There’s a substantial amount of research out there on corporate psychopaths. But I’m sure there’s crossover with sociopaths as well..

    • Bev says:

      09:29am | 05/11/10

      I find my self in agreement with most of what you have written. You make out a good case against “affirmative action”. You did leave out one class of psychopaths (by your definition) gender feminists they are just as ruthless and some case more so than any executive.  What is more they have managed to inflict damage to many more people (all of society) than any company executive could as their damage is confined to people within a company and others who may deal with that company.

    • Mother Rose says:

      10:07am | 05/11/10

      Generally speaking,

      I’ve always found that a “leg over” equals a “leg up”

    • TheRealDave says:

      10:32am | 05/11/10

      So Tors, while you are at home for 10-15 years popping out kids, taking them to school and soccer practice your male former colleagues are putting in 60 hours a week chained to that desk, scoffing stale bickies etc and you expect them to simply stand aside when you get bored with Oprah and the kids are old enough to get themselves to school?

      Yeah, typical.

      Men make it up the ladder because of the years and sacrifice they put into it, just like women who make the choice to do it as well. Women choose not to have kids or become working mums in order to get up that ladder. Men sacrifice time with their kids and partners. Your fat, bald, two stale bickies away from a heart attack corporate bloke is probably already reaping the rewards of losing his house and 3/4’s of everything he’s worked for so far to his missus, his kids are probably estranged from him because he spent 60 hours a week at work providing for them.

      Are women willing to step up like that? Or do you just expect to walk into a C level role after 10-15 years playing mum?

    • Ryan says:

      11:09am | 05/11/10

      So we should start promoting people only because of their gender and not because of their competence?
      Are you proposing we do something that is illegal?

    • Tory Shepherd says:

      12:59pm | 05/11/10

      Hell no, Ryan - where did you get that from? I was arguing that women are doing pretty well, thank you very much, and that the fact they are not on the boards of ASX-listed companies is no indicator of success.

      For the record, I think targets on gender balance lead to tokenism.

    • fennel says:

      11:42am | 05/11/10

      If Gillard/Keanelly/Bligh represent the best of female politicians than Houstan we have a problem.

    • davo says:

      11:43am | 05/11/10

      The only use of the phrase “dib dib dib dob dob dob” that I’m aware of is in the scouting movement where Cubs afirm that they’ll do their best in response to their leader exhorting them to do just that.
      What has a bunch of 8-10 year old kids committing to always “do their best” got to do with “Secret handshakes and betrayal”?
      I realise that many people have a poor view of the scouting movement and clearly Tory does, but I just can’t see the connection here. Can someone please spell it out for me to stop me jumping to conclusions?

    • Tory Shepherd says:

      01:02pm | 05/11/10

      Hey, Davo - it’s probably a fair point that it wasn’t that clear. Dib is actually “dyb” ... do your best. I was making a pun of crude sorts on taking dibs and dobbing on others (ie secret betrayals and handshakes) along with a reference to the way gorup mentalities and mantras work to reinforce conformity.

      Or something like that.

      Did not mean to impugn the Scouts.

    • Jotun says:

      01:36pm | 05/11/10

      Tory, I know this is an argument against women having to become like men to make it to the top, but all you’ve really said here is that the rules should change so supermums can rule the corporate world, and anyone who decides to dedicate their lives to get these roles should step aside, because they’re likely to be a psychopath and a man.

      Can you see what impression I get from this article? I even made sense of it for you.

    • Jotun says:

      03:14pm | 05/11/10

      My comment didn’t make sense either =S

      “... anyone who decides to dedicate their ENTIRE lives to get to these roles should step aside for aforementioned supermums, because we can’t have men who are more likely to be psychopathic in executive positions.”

    • wally the worker says:

      02:06pm | 05/11/10

      It’s true a woman does not have to be a man to succed in business. There are exceptions, when a woman can be both, and suceed. Nobody would deny Leigh Varis-Beswick was unsuccessful. Mary-Anne Kenworthy , not of the same circumstance, but as a business partner, has also been successful, and there wouldn’t be a man in sight, at least along the Nullabor with good vision, who could be counted in any way envious, or a competitor,  to these business people, and in fact it could be said, they have no bloke enemies, only female ones, which of course, cannot legitimately be counted.

    • Wok says:

      04:32pm | 05/11/10

      Tory.  make a decision and live with it.  Men can’t have babies.  Live with it.  If you can’t do both then live with it.  Half the population couldn’t care less.  There are a few more important issues around than this.  Psychopaths?  You need to get in the real world.  This is the worst article I have ever read on this site.

    • sam says:

      08:20pm | 05/11/10

      Those who have corporate psychopathy are mba graduates the demographic all the studies and experts say have it.

      Blokey culture in Australia is ridiculed in european culture…

      It’s an inside joke people just to let you know,

    • acotrel says:

      07:27am | 06/11/10

      It’s about time someone wrote an article dedicated to psychopaths in the workplace.  Brodie Panlock found a bunch of them at Cafe Vamp in Melbourne who harassed her until she committed suicide!

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      09:15pm | 05/11/10

      Hi Tory,
      Another great topic by the way.  It is great timing to at least get the conversation going.  We have to begin somewhere, if want to change anything in today’s world, especially when it comes to women’s rights and issues concerning us.  We just have to look at the greater picture and how much we have achieved already.  We just have to try harder and stay positive along this process.  I presume that most people are threatened by very intelligent and successful women.  I wonder why?? Why is it so wrong for women to succeed in the areas traditionally dominated by males up until recently??  It is most probably a very old and preconceived idea anyway. 

      To change our lives takes strength, to stay the same does not.  We just have to change our strategy and look at the whole picture from an objective point of view.  It is a bit like journalism I guess, telling the story from both sides without being prejudiced and biased.  In the past we have talked about role models for the young generation.  We just need to come up with good role models for our children, whether they happen to be girls or boys.  After all, we are on this earth for a reason and we have to have faith in success rather than failure.  Hopefully, we will achieve those equal rights and work opportunities for women, most people like to talk about.  Instead of just talk, it is time for workable actions and solutions.  Best regards to your editors.

    • Horthy says:

      01:08pm | 06/11/10

      “I presume that most people are threatened by very intelligent and successful women”

      Nope. Not at all. Intelligent and successful women make great decisions in the managerial roles this article describes. Women there for gender imbalance _sometimes_ do not. Is it truly that hard to understand?

    • Lady Luck says:

      07:40am | 06/11/10

      Big business gives men more than a leg up, they give it a leg over. And, women think and problem solve differently than men and if ever the twin should meet - female and male co CEO, that could be a real winner!

    • Ray Graham says:

      09:14am | 06/11/10

      Tory, your article is the succinct example of whyperveyore of such article need to face legal repurcussions based on abrogation of social responsibility to present some semblance of the truth devoid of pethological bigotry.

      Men have had a gitful of this relentless portrayal of women as being disadvantaged, men being at fault, when the truth is if anything that the precise reverse represents the truth.

      Women are the ones that get the leg up in the workforce, they get the leg up in education, they get the leg up in the family court, they get the leg up across the board in legal prosecutions, they get the leg up in health funding, they get the leg up in political representaton, put simply they GET THE LEG UP persee.

      If you simply want to talk of employment check the banks, teaching, federal, State and local governments and health industry. And while at it check the unemployment in every State in Australia where more men than women are unemployed in EVERY State. With the professions, women’s culpably intended education advantage provided them with the advantage in these higher paying professions. Also simply put, in the main quartile of employment, ie the main number of every day punter, women hold the better positions, higher paid, more superannuation focussed positions than men. And yes they are still provided with promotion accelleration programs and  
      the attendent interview favouritism. All provided through a disgracefully lopsided education system. The myth of higher pay by men in the workforce mainstream similarly has no credibility

      Tory, time to give up this indoctrination paranoia. Just check how many articles emanating from the madia in the last week have a path to defile men and promote women. The article on the demonisation of men highlighted by a Hornsby swimming poll matter is to the point.

      The over all sadness is that women are indoctrinated from birth to think as your article presents. It is why with most women come the conclusion after child raising that their husband is useless, manifests into divorce.

      Please take a wake up call and take on board some social responsibility and get off the socially destructive path.

    • Ray Graham says:

      09:56am | 06/11/10

      Tory you have reached the point of no return.

      Society , the media and people of your ilk are incapable of giving men credit for what they achieve. in your doctrine men ‘s achievement is all due to discrimination against women or bias. Whereas all achieved by women is through dedication and hard work against all odds.

      Ever thought that men might say I’ve got no choice but to work for the family so why not give it all I’ve got. Noting that he’ll need it when cleaned out through the usual path of divorce.

      Try a new tack, give men some credit for their avhievements. Get women to aspire to achievement. And ditch the discredit path.

      I might add no one has the right to label somone else as psychopathic with out proven cause. you should be accountable for such irresponsible terminology. But then again you are female with a protected species shield. Bit like labelling all men as paedophiles as in a deliberate path of discredit over many years. Once the sixty+ year old men were the pillars of our society held in greast esteem. Well feminism and the bile that goes with it sure fixed that.

    • Lisa H. says:

      06:33pm | 06/11/10

      Did I just read you right? Did you write that women are less likely to be ‘psychopaths’ and therefore are less likely to succeed in business?

      Methinks you got your ideas on ‘business’ from a cartoon of a guy in a suit.

      It seems to me that women who whine about glass ceilings are really just indulging in a theoretical whinge, want success to come easy, or they work in a massive company where there are plenty of competitors for top positions.

      The biggest asset men have n their quest for success is the ‘pull/push’ they get from the supportive women in their lives. Men don’t tend to play the supportive role so well.

      It’s not the boss’s fault, it’s your boyfriend’s. Or your own.

      Drop the chip, get going, and see what you can do for yourself. There are plenty of successful women out there. Go it alone if the group politics is too much. Margaret Thatcher did quite well. She was super smart though wasn’t she, and never played the victim, in spite of all the stereotyping and viciousness.

    • Ms P says:

      11:23am | 08/11/10

      Hi Tory,
      I attended the Don Dunstan Foundation evening last week and I enjoyed all the speeches and debates.
      One thing has stuck with me ever since.
      And I pose the question to you…

      I agree with your sentiment that success is achieving your own personal goals rather than a prescribed goal (such as being CEO of ASX company). So, my question is, if success of the women’s movement is measured (particularly by Govt statisticians) in terms of equal pay, board positions, and the like - when will we ever be able to say that we’ve achieved equality?

      It strikes me that, somehow, we need to change the meansurement criteria, because I think women are able to achieve these roles but often chose not to because they recognise the sacrifices they entail (we just need to look at our fathers) and decide that no money is worth that…

      And, also, alot of men find themselves in positions of ‘success’ without really wanting to be there - how come they are measured as successful, and a woman (like myself) who is happily managing a consulting company, is deemed unsuccessful because my company is not on the ASX?

      Hmmmm…

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@nigelmcbain I don't see the nexus between gay marriage and gay sex education in schools. ACL does. Health issues should be taught whatever

Daniel Piotrowski

@jennijenni a few companies are known to do that - ask for story ideas from job applicants so they can steal them later

Malcolm Farr

: Bruce Springsteen: "I get roughed up crowdsurfing… people try to pull chunks out of me" http://t.co/jiHqt8agt9” it was him, @patricklion

Daniel Piotrowski

Ray Hadley fires back at Carlton. Great @candacesutton1 get: http://t.co/7fQzk4Xixh

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter