With the Commonwealth Bank announcing a record profit last week you have to wonder if the big banks are laughing all the way to bank at consumer’s expense. What are struggling Aussie families with mortgages to make of the ever growing profits by the big banks and warnings from bank CEOs to expect more interest rate rises?

Pithy take: Warren Brown in The Daily Telegraph

Well, consumers and Aussie families need to be really upset at the failure of the Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan and the ACCC to protect competition in the banking sector. Wayne Swan and the ACCC just stood by and let the major banks take out vigorous competitors.

This failure has allowed the four major banks to increase their stranglehold of the banking sector to such dangerous levels that the major banks can now just increase interest rates and fees at will.

Let’s be very clear. The failure of both the Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan and the ACCC to stop the major banks from taking over St George and BankWest was a big mistake and has allowed the 4 major banks to heavily dominate the Australian banking sector. This mistake was made worse by the Treasurer’s and ACCC’s failure to stop the major banks from cleaning up or taking strategic interests in the non bank mortgage specialists such as RAMS, Aussie Home Loans and Wizard. These non-bank mortgage specialists were instrumental in driving competition and strong putting downward pressure on mortgage rates. By seeking to neutralise these players the 4 major banks have been able to cement their dominance of the Australian banking sector to the ongoing detriment of consumers.

Now, there is no doubt that the defenders of the four major banks will come out to stick up for the “poor” banks. Leave the banks alone they will say. The banks are doing it “tough” you may also hear them say. Sadly, there is nothing “poor” about the four major banks. They are rock solid thanks to their dominance of the market and because of a world’s best prudential regulatory system.  Of course, you will also get the bank’s shareholders who love the bumper profits and don’t like “their” banks to be criticised. That’s understandable as they have a vested interest in the banks making as much money as possible and may not be too concerned about the “poor” bank customers.

Yes, it’s good when banks are profitable. We do want our banks to be strong, but similarly we don’t want our banks to gouge consumers. Clearly, there comes a point where profit making becomes profiteering. When is the line crossed? Quite simply, the line is crossed when the level of real competition in the market is so weak that the 4 major banks can keep making record profits. Record profits suggest that there is a lack of real competition to keep downward pressure on interest rates and fees. Naturally, defenders of the 4 major banks will suggest that the banks are “well managed.” Yes, the banks may be well managed, but it’s a lot easier for management to make record profits when the competition is weak or where competitors act as a cosy club.

Once we acknowledge that we have a cosy club in the Australian banking sector it’s important to understand how that’s happened and what can be done to fix the problem. First, the willingness of Wayne Swan and the ACCC to allow the majors to take out vigorous competitors so easily is one of the key reasons we now have 4 dominant major banks. Yes, we may have weak anti-merger laws that allow the ACCC to regularly wave through all but a handful of mergers that the ACCC considers, but we also need to remember that the Federal Treasurer has a veto power under our banking laws to stop bank mergers and acquisitions. Now the answer is simple. We need stronger anti-merger laws that prevent large and powerful companies from so easily taking out vigorous competitors. We also need the Federal Treasurer to be a bit more “hairy-chested” and veto some future mergers and acquisitions involving the 4 major banks in both the banking and the wealth management sectors.

With Australia having one of the most concentrated banking sectors in the world where the four major banks act as a cosy club on interest rates and fees to the detriment of consumers, it’s clear that new competitors are urgently needed to help drive down mortgage and credit card rates. Given the ongoing failure of the Federal Government’s “bank switching” package it’s also essential that we also have effective competition laws. With Australia having some of the weakest competition laws in the world it’s time to update our competition law framework to help drive competitive outcomes for the benefit of consumers and small businesses.

Ultimately, we need new independent competitors to emerge to take on the 4 major banks. That’s where Virgin Money’s launch of new credit cards and an online savings account is good news for consumers who have been victims of gouging by the 4 major banks. In fact, Virgin Money’s new credit cards and online savings account represent a vital step forward in ensuring effective competition in the banking sector.

More however is needed from players like Virgin Money. For example, we should look forward to Virgin Money offering mortgage products as that’s where consumers need to see real competition and that’s where the old players like RAMS, Aussie Home Loans and Wizard were once so very effective in driving competition and keeping the four majors very honest. Clearly, Virgin Money has a unique opportunity to leverage the very strong brand recognition enjoyed by Virgin in Australia into a much needed strong new competitive force in the banking sector.

All in all, the overwhelming dominance that the four major banks have been allowed to achieve is yet another failure of this Federal Labor Government to deal with the numerous gaps and weaknesses in our competition and consumer laws. It’s those weakness and gaps that continue to be so effectively exploited by the banks, major supermarket chains and oil companies to the detriment of consumers. That’s why it’s important for governments of all persuasion to implement effective competition and consumers laws for the benefit of Aussie families.

9 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      05:53am | 18/08/10

      Could not agree more.

      When the Government moved to guarantee the banks, they only guaranteed the Tier 1 banks. What does that say about their impression of banks such as Bendigo and Bank of Queensland?

      Sure, the Government made a few bucks out of it, but it was the end consumer who paid AGAIN. The Big Four Banking Cartel still made their expected profit.

      Various Governments have stood by and done nothing while these corporate bandits have subsumed Challenge, BankWest, Bank of Melbourne, BankSA and St George.

      Personally, I think the Government should have enacted an extraordinary tax on profits for as long as the Cartel had a taxpayer-funded guarantee. It isn’t like they are even good corporate citizens; they all ship work to India, rather than provide employment for Aussies. This includes your complete financial history and all your personal details. The Indian companies are, naturally, not subject to the Australian Privacy Act, so we are all at risk.

      Bottom line - we are seen as nothing more than a cash spigot for these Collins Street spivs.  Bankers are merely crooks in suits.

    • Brad of Bentleigh says:

      06:28am | 18/08/10

      Finally, some open acceptance of Wayne Swan’s incompetence… let’s not forget Rudd’s role in the banks crushing competition… the bank guarantee was way over the top.
      Because of Rudd’s penchanct for the dramatic, he decredd that the guranteee shold be unlimited which locked the small players out of the lending market (their borrowing costs skyrocketed, while the big 4’s didn’t).

      And these are the clowns trying to con people into beleiving that they are somehow better at managing the economy? Give me a break… the most depressing thing about that, is because they’re (the ALP) advertising that, people swallow it. Is there no end to the gullability of voters in this country?

    • Liz says:

      08:48am | 18/08/10

      Absolutely…love the cartoon.

    • Gekko says:

      08:59am | 18/08/10

      Banks are a business, not a charity. They don’t exist just to give people loans to buy houses they can ill-afford.

      If you don’t like the banks or their fees then go to a credit union or building society. The Greater Building Society has some of the most competitive interest rates around and doesn’t charge any fees.

      Vote with your feet and stop complaining.

      The four bank pillars policy has been a mainstay of banking policy since Keating and was reinforced under Howard. Don’t complain that because successive governments (both Labor and Liberal) have fostered this move.

      There are a lot of players in the market. Do your research and stop whining.

    • Steve says:

      09:04am | 18/08/10

      The damage was done long long ago ... but you know that!!! Whenever there is debate on economics Liberal supporters champion how great they were at eliminating debt! I don’t consider many of these people to be well informed. Here in part an article from fin review about our account deficit. Do you think Costello and friends were the great debt busters after reading the following? Labor’s stimulus package comes in at about 1% of the total enjoy. Tony might happily forget that while his former government colleagues were steering the good ship Australia, the nation’s total debt soared from a mere $700 billion in 1997 up to $3.2 trillion by the close of their term. An increase 387% Deregulation brought growth all right. But there is a yin for every yang. Opposition may well brag that it left office with zero debt - zero government debt that is as the upshot of policy was to lump it onto the consumer. The first home buyer grant that artificially inflated house prices out of everyone’s reach sold every profitable publicly owned enterprise to get a very short sighted budget surplus pushed out the credit systems where people were actually given one two and three credit cards And we wonder how and why the GFC happened!
      http://www.abc.net.au/iview/#/view/613694 the link will go to one plus one there is a guy their called Joseph Stiglitz knows a little about economics worth listening too…

    • Realist says:

      01:28pm | 18/08/10

      Joseph Stiglitz is an economics lala land fantasy economist.  His stimulus did not save America, nor Britain, nor Greece.  It is useless.  The GFC has proven that Keynesian economics is dead and finally buried.

      You paid for those pink batts and the $900 cheques, you should be pissed that they were wasted.

    • James1 says:

      03:07pm | 18/08/10

      Indeed Realist.  Now that Keynesian economics has finally been put to rest, I am awaiting the death of neoliberalism.  It is only a matter of time until the situation changes (as it always has before), and as Keynes once said, when the facts change, I change my opinion.  What do you do, sir?

    • Jack says:

      10:24am | 18/08/10

      Dear Frank,

      Please explain how the ‘non bank specialists’ like Aussie/RAMS/Wizard - who lack a deposit base and therefore relied wholly upon securitisation to fund their loan book - were going to continue operations after the entire securitisation market was effectively shut down during the GFC. Would you have preferred they were bankrupted?

      While you are at it, please also give us some ideas on how these ‘new competitors’ (which, with only 150+ ADIs in this country, we *clearly* need!) are going to magically undercut mortgage rates from the big banks - you know, given they have to source their funding from the same places, but at higher rates.

      But hey, don’t let facts stop your predictable weekly bank-bashing and whining about competition law though. Light on facts, heavy on rhetoric - just like usual.

      Thanks,
      Someone who actually has a clue.

      ps, while you are rambling on about Virgin Money being so new and different, feel free to throw in the fact that their products were managed by Westpac last time, and by Citibank this time. Genius.

    • Steve says:

      10:54am | 18/08/10

      SwIngs and roundabouts.
      We are ALL bank shareholders- go see where your super is invested. It’ll be unusual to find no banks in your portfolio. So when the banks profit, you profit, as yoursuper goes up in value- both in share price increases and dividends.
      There’s more to it than mortgages.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @popculturechris: Meanwhile, Gotye holds no.1 for a sixth massive week in the US - "that" song has now sold over 4 million copies there.

ToryShepherd

@loupascale if the survey made you sad, probably skip the comments...

Paul Colgan

@paulwiggins @richardkendall that fountain pens yarn is a great social trend story

Paul Colgan

I like how a tip erodes so only you can use it MT “@paulwiggins: BBC News - Why are fountain pen sales rising? http://t.co/0hk2MRtf

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

When you take on a job like being Environment Minister there’s some hits you can see coming. …

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

Welcome to this week’s I Call Bullshit column. It’s a regular column that looks at skulduggery…

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

We are taught early in life that we should not question authority. We must listen to our parents, our…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter