There’s a high-risk derivative of the time-honoured “Secret Santa” that has become quite popular in recent years.  All the carefully (and not so carefully) selected gifts are pooled and one by one participants get to select and open a present.  They then face a choice: keep the present they’ve just opened or forfeit it and go for another, the contents of which are unknown but with which they will be stuck.

This summer Kevin Rudd is Bad Santa

Ornately wrapped, carefully presented gift boxes adorned with bows and baubles are, unsurprisingly, first picks.  But they don’t often yield the best results.

However, it’s human to be tempted by the promise of something better, to be lured by the illusion of a grander prize.

And it’s exactly what many Australians experienced just a few months before Christmas in 2007.

Here was a shiny new ballot box option – polished, presented and tempting with a literal cornucopia of promises.  Each grander than the next.  Rudd was political tinsel at its shiniest.

The Howard Government by contrast was so practical, so familiar – like a brown paper package tied up with string (and who apart from Julie Andrews finds that alluring?)  Besides, Australians were generally comfortable enough with the personal bounty of gifts under their own trees – the risk of the electoral Secret Santa did not seem too great.  Hey, why not, they might get something better?

Two years on, having scrambled through the mass of tinsel, shiny bauble promises and tissue paper spin, it’s become apparent to many Australians that the box is actually empty. It was all about appearances.  It was all about being new and glittery – not actually offering anything substantial.

While list-making is a seasonal sport, I won’t go into Labor’s litany of broken promises, economic failures and lack of action.  It would be much longer than Santa’s list – and heavier on the naughty than the nice.

So I’ll just give you a few examples from the portfolio I held for the past 14 months, Early Childhood Education, Childcare, Women and Youth.

Remember the highly-publicised pre-election promise to build 260 new childcare Centres and end the dreaded “double drop off”?  Despite building thousands of “Julia Gillard Memorial Halls” in schools around the country (even those that didn’t want or need them) only one of these Centres is operational, only 38 have been budgeted for and the promise to build the other 222 has disappeared as quickly as a stash of batteries on Christmas morning.

Before the election Rudd shouted from the chimney tops that vacancy data on childcare be released publicly, so the industry would know where there were shortages.  Not once has this information been released on Rudd’s watch – despite the fact it is now collected every single week (it was last released in April 2007 under the previous Government).  Hmmm…not exactly what those who reached for the shiny Rudd present would have expected.

Ditto on the promise of “universal access” for preschool – which we now learn does not mean free preschool…but means handing close to a billion dollars to Rudd’s Labor mates in the States and Territories who created the problem in the first place.

OK – but what about that promise of making childcare more affordable?  That was a biggie.  That had a lot of parents saying “I’ll take the political tinsel”.  Well, Labor’s ideologically driven changes being forced on the industry mean that childcare is expected to actually rise substantially – some estimates say as much as $40 per week.  And the Minister has admitted that parents will foot the bill.

These are the same parents who probably found the promises of cheaper petrol and cheaper groceries very appealing as well. And that’s worked out, hasn’t it?

I could go on – but it is the season to be charitable.  And I ought to point out that the shiny Rudd box was not completely empty – oh no – underneath all the packaging was a substantial bill for each and every taxpayer.  Like a dodgy Christmas marketer, Rudd has been the master of the “spend now, pay later” mentality.

55 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Paul says:

      07:00am | 22/12/09

      Well thanks for playing your part in higher groceries and petrol prices and heartlessly adding GST onto increasing prices. Rudd has been pathetically hypocritical on these issues, as you Howard reruns are. Will you take on the food and petrol cartels Sophie - or just continue to be bigmouthed, actionless and policyless? Now you got your empty leftie free kick in, what about something for the season and the people/families doing it tough over Xmas Miss Scrooge?

    • Valery says:

      07:26am | 22/12/09

      The difference Paul is, Rudd used these things (food and petrol) to buy himself votes and made “promises” to fix them and didn’t. Why be so nasty Paul? It’s Christmas time ho ho ho ho!

    • Blaise says:

      07:49am | 22/12/09

      The more I read Sophie Mirabella’s columns, the more I respect her. She is thoughtful, and knows how to make a coherent, strong argument. She is definitely one of the best coalition frontbenchers.

    • Donna says:

      07:52am | 22/12/09

      Paul - “will you take on the food and petrol cartels Sophie - or just continue to be bigmouthed, actionless and policyless?” ummm? correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this what the Rudd Government promised before the last election to do if you gave them your vote? Isn’t it the Rudd Government that continue to be bigmouthed, actionnless and policyless?

    • hoofman says:

      08:12am | 22/12/09

      Sophie, we are still waiting for Tony Abbott to perform a combination of Santa Claus, the Magic Pudding, and the miracle of the loaves and fishes in delivering a carbon pollution reduction scheme that won’t cost taxpayers. If he manages that he may be in line for elevation as Australia’s second saint, so soon after the first one.

      I suspect Tony’s act will be one strictly for the believers in miracles.

    • Libbie says:

      08:15am | 22/12/09

      Blaise, surely you jest. Sophie knifed her leader who was trying to take the Liberals forward, so that she can praise her beloved Howard Government which ripped billions out of the health system, failed to build any infrastructure and took Australian social policy back 50 years.
      And to talk about “economic failures” is a joke. Australia’s about the only country to have survived a recession. Of course the Liberals will praise that as all Howard’s work (ignoring the fact that the Howard Government enjoyed a massive resources boom and none of the tough times of the moment) and ignore that almost every commentator has said that the stimulus plan has been a massive success.
      My kids have got a “Julia Gillard Memorial Hall” being built at their school and what I can tell Sophie for free is that no one at our school thinks it’s a bad thing. There are 40 businesses working on the hall who were struggling to find other work. I for one think that’s a good investment in both our kids and in workers.
      Sophie, take the Christmas time with your family and then come back next year with some positive alternative policies. That would be something worth reading.

    • Russ says:

      08:16am | 22/12/09

      Blaise - “one of the best coalition frontbenchers”.  Damning with faint praise.  Mickey Mouse would look good on this coalition front bench, but I don’t think he’d be sufficiently right-wing to make it.  And I certainly remember lots of carefully targeted shiny new presents being thrown around by the Howard government just before elections.

    • Paul says:

      08:19am | 22/12/09

      @sophie@donna Reread my post, I pointed out that both sides were being hypocritical. Just because you go to an 07 or the next election without* runs on the board or even a policy on cartels - you are less hypocritical? Pluease! Beware of electoral politicians - only Santa delivers on promises.

    • Mike says:

      08:22am | 22/12/09

      @hoofman - Abbott has said there would be a cost involved, but it wouldn’t cost as much as Kevin Rudds ETS. Maybe we should wait until he actually announces what he plans to do first, before commenting. He said he plans to release his proposal for climate change action before Feb 1.

    • H of SA says:

      08:25am | 22/12/09

      So Sophie, what your telling the country is that we voted the current government in because we are stupid enough to be distracted by shiny tinsel…...good luck winning votes with that

    • Realist says:

      08:33am | 22/12/09

      I love how all the “Kevin 07” stickers on peoples cars have the red “07” faded and now it just says “Kevin”.  I suppose he likes seeing his name everywhere on everything….

    • persephone says:

      08:52am | 22/12/09

      Gee, Sophie, at least Kevin made an attempt to keep his promises.

      You went to the last election promising an ETS, I believe?

      Nice to see you’re up to speed with your NEW portfolio already. But I guess Science, Industry and Innovation are foreign concepts for you…or did Rudd keep all his promises in that area?

    • Tim says:

      08:56am | 22/12/09

      H of SA

      I agree with you entirely.

      Telling the public they are stupid is a sure way to win them back.

    • Nicki says:

      08:56am | 22/12/09

      Hi Sophie.
      What a venom tale so close to Christmas but I see that you don’t take a break or respect of the Holly.
      By the way thanks for warning us abut Tony and his promises before the election.

    • hoofman says:

      09:28am | 22/12/09

      Mike 9:22 am - Abbott and co are already leaking their ideas for carbon offsets. Tree planting, we’ve heard. All citizens will be required to put on their work boots, pick up a pick and shovel, and get plantin’. A nation of johnny appleseeds, we’ll be. Or hayseeds, if we consider the National Party voters.
      Then, we’ll be required to set fire to some old newspapers and christmas gift wrapping but use hoses to put out the fire before all is consumed. We will then bury the charred paper in the ground, say three hail marys and keep our fingers crossed. Carbon sequestration.

    • Patrick says:

      09:33am | 22/12/09

      This article is entirely telling of the Liberal party’s attitude towards Australians. That is that The Australian people where fooled into voting for the Rudd government, Rudd is a fake, people will wake up to Rudd sooner or later etc etc.

      You forget Sophie that the Australian people always make the right choice, they do not respond well to people telling them they are stupid, that they where wrong. The longer you and your colleagues underestimate Rudd the longer you will stay out of power, and you have been underestimating him since the end of 2006, that all you have to do is blow hard enough and eventually people will wake up and his facade will come crashing down.

      Sorry, but it doesn’t work like that.

    • Diamantina Dick says:

      10:07am | 22/12/09

      “The Australian people where fooled into voting for the Rudd government, Rudd is a fake, people will wake up to Rudd sooner or later etc etc”

      Everybody knows this now. Sooner or later people admit their mistakes and rectify them in the privacy of the voting booth.

    • Lenny says:

      10:09am | 22/12/09

      Sophie, it’s your party that doesn’t have a policy and you and your frontbench with Tony Abbott for leader won’t win the next election. Don’t try and make us believe you because we won’t, we no better than to believe liberals. Kevin Rudd is the best prime minister Australia has ever had, and he will beat Tony Abbott any day.

    • RT says:

      10:21am | 22/12/09

      ‘Everybody knows this now’ (that Rudd is a fake), Diamantina Dick?  Well, he has an approval rating around 70% in the opinion polls. Seems a few ‘everybodies’ are excluded from the opinion polls, huh? But what would the opinion polls know, they’ve only got the last 5 federal election results right, right?

    • Giselle says:

      10:27am | 22/12/09

      Yes RT will be interesting to see the opinion polls in 6 months, I wonder if you will still be spruking about Rudds approval rating?

    • T.Chong says:

      10:29am | 22/12/09

      H of SA,Persephone and Lenny, you seem to be able to say something I can’t.
      It is insulting to the public to imply that Howard and Co. were booted out thru boredom.
      They were booted out mainly because of serfchoices, for any Connedservative to pretend otherwise shows denial.
      Rudd will win next time, and when he is ready to step down, our first gal PM Gillard will take his place, ensuring Labor for at least another 2-3 terms.
      At this rate Sen.Sophie will have plenty of time to morph into a Bronny Bishop, and be just as irrevalent to any debate.

    • Andrew Thoms says:

      10:34am | 22/12/09

      RT- sorry mate, but I don’t think we will see approval ratings like this for Kevin Rudd for much longer with Tony Abbott now on the scene.

    • Patrick says:

      10:56am | 22/12/09

      I had to do a double take at your comment Diamantina Dick, you repeated that same line that I had just rubbished, that Australians made a mistake and will realize it over time.  Essentially the message of the Liberal party is “You where all wrong! We know whats best for you even if you do not! Now vote for us again”, a classic big government, anti libertarian and anti democratic line, the idea that people are too stupid to make up their own minds and make rational decisions on who they will vote for.

      It is also somewhat bemusing that the Liberal party thinks its best chance of getting back into office is to attack the government’s strongest point, Rudd, the most popular Prime Minister in this country’s history. A monumentally stupid tactic if ever there was one (although of course, people will “wake up” to Rudd sooner or later because he is a fake blah blah blah etc etc”)

      Do not confuse your own opinion of Rudd as a “phony” with the opinions of the electorate at large. That is what we call projection.

      The Libs are going to have to do the hard yards to convince the Australian people that they are worthy of governing the country again, not by an all out relentless assault of mud slinging upon Rudd’s character, a tactic which has repeatedly backfired (Brian Burke, Utegate, to name the two most significant) and will continue to backfire.

    • Muriel says:

      11:00am | 22/12/09

      I think Kevin Rudd might even beat John Howards record. Beacause he’s a better PM and alot more popular than Howard. I hope Kevin doesn’t hand over to Julia Gillard (although she is very good), because I would like to see Kevin Rudd stay as Leader for at least another 3 or 4 terms. It’s not often you come across a Prime Minister as competent and statesman like as Kevin Rudd. He’s put Australia on the world stage, something no other PM could do. Abbott has blinkers on and can’t see any further than in his own back yard and he’s nothing but a yobo.

    • persephone says:

      11:07am | 22/12/09

      Sophie, you should be out of the denial phase by now and into acceptance.

      But (for you, at least) this would require two qualities you don’t possess: (i) a work ethic and (ii) flexibility of mind.

      You need (i) because accepting that Howard’s agenda was rejected by the electorate and the Liberals need a different set of policies will require you to sit down and work at your new portfolio. Obviously, at present you haven’t even begun to get your head around it (or are you like your leader, TA, who thought his last portfolio wasn’t worthy of him and therefore said almost nothing about it?)

      I know understanding science and industry are a little hard for you, but I’m sure lots of people are willing to give you good advice. ‘Innovation’ may be more of an intellectual challenge, but hey, I’m sure you could manage if you try.

      And you’ll need (ii) to do the necessary thinking, so that you understand that your world view, which is self obviously valid for you, doesn’ t resonate with the ordinary voter and you need to move away from it.

      But hey, neither of those things are going to happen, because they’re both things you just don’t do.

    • TrickorTreat says:

      11:10am | 22/12/09

      The problem is it isn’t quite like this. When opening a political present, its either the devil you know, or the devil you dont know.
      Both are carefully crafted to deceive it seems.
      Any choice can be a bad choice depending on the candidates.
      While corporate bodies are influencing politics with promises of what should be a basic right. that is the one of having a job, we will never get whats needed for the people. Only for the bean counters.
      Its as bad as a game of two up…
      Its time we had a real Santa….

    • Davy says:

      11:12am | 22/12/09

      Interesting that these verbal sparings often degenerate into opinion polls. Sort of “well my dad can beat up on your dad anyday”.
      It is apparent that the public do not often, en masse, make good logical decisions based on great thought.
      Does cola of a particular brand really taste better???

      Any marketing guru knows this.
      Unfortunately too often it is the wrapping that gets the attention rather than the substance.

    • Margaret Gray says:

      11:16am | 22/12/09

      GroceryWatch
      FuelWatch
      FugeeWatch
      ClimateWatch
      NetWatch

      ...and now Nohopenchangen.

      The litany of epic fails by Kevin and the Ruddites since November 2007 is nothing short of breathtaking.

      Watching him stumble around the halls at LegoLand desperately looking for mates was HILARIOUS.

      Missing his chance to be Head Prefect…priceless.

      Matched only by the calls of some above who insist Opposition parties must have POLICIES.

      Only a political novice would make such an inane observation.

    • RT says:

      11:17am | 22/12/09

      Giselle, I’m not spruiking anything, just pointing out the folly of Liberal supporters thinking that ‘everybody’ thinks like them and their likeminded friends. I’m no Rudd fan, Andrew Thoms, but the Libs have yet to do anything that will shorten his time in office. Self-delusion is no help when it comes to politics. Abbott may (emphasis, may) be able to make some inroads into that,  but, at best, not nearly enough.

    • Buster says:

      11:32am | 22/12/09

      The Libs are panicked because they thought if they changed their leader they would be popular but it didn’t work. Kevin Rudd is still most poplular, look at the polls.

    • T.Chong says:

      11:47am | 22/12/09

      Margaret Gray: imagine anyone wanting policies from the opposition ?
      outrageous isnt it? Could it possibly be because they dont have any actual policies?
      The LNP only policy is to oppose for its own sake.
      TA and crowd are cynically trying on “anti politics” politics, the type that failed so spectacularly for Palin.
      But as Abbott has shown via his “new look” front bench, he is willing to flog a dead horse.

    • persephone says:

      11:49am | 22/12/09

      Let’s see, Margaret.

      Yes, I’ll give you GroceryWatch. The government delivered on a promise and it didn’t work out. That’s sometimes the problem with innovative ideas.

      FuelWatch - again, the government attempted to deliver on a promise, and the Libs wouldn’t let them. So the Libs fault.

      Have no idea what you mean by FugeeWatch. If you meant the repealing of harsh and regressive policies which even Howard had made it clear hadn’t worked, and which the government had a mandate to repeal, then again, the government kept an election promise. I can understand a Lib having a problem with that concept.

      I assume by ClimateWatch you mean the ETS, a promise which the Libs took to the election and have now reneged on. Again, the government tried to deliver on a promise they’d made to the electorate and the Libs stopped this happening. So who’s fault is it?

      NetWatch - has yet to be delivered, so how can we work out whether it’s going to work or not? I know there are some people are passionately against it, but there are nearly always some people who are passionately against proposed legislation. If it doesn’t work, it might be like GroceryWatch. We’ll see.

      Nopenchangen. Right. So you think that Rudd’s important enough on the world stage to be able to get 190 countries to sign up to the same agreement? I’m sure he’d appreciate your confidence in him, but would also point out that he aint Superman.

      Yep, we had a leader at Copenhagen who was constantly cited in the press (not here, alas) as a leading negotiator and a serious player. He himself admits it was a frustrating process and that he didn’t achieve what he wanted. But we had a lot more of a profile and were taken a lot more seriously than we ever were under Howard.

      And, yes, the Opposition party does need to have policies. Please cite one in the history of Australian politics who have gone to the election without them. Yes, it might be a risky business, and some of them mightn’t work in practice (something you don’t know til you try) but you still need them.

      Only someone without any understanding of politics at all would make such an observation.

    • South Aussie says:

      12:12pm | 22/12/09

      Anyone going to deny the broken promises outlined in the article, which is what the article is about and what we are mean’t to comment on? Or are they all accurate?

      And anyone who pulls out the ‘at least they tried line’, you should expect better from the people you elected to be the leaders of this country.

      I know I do.

    • Steve says:

      12:19pm | 22/12/09

      My kids have got a hall, new toilets and a new admin block. They’ve also lost about half the playground space that they had. They think that it is very unfair that they were not given a chance to say “No Thanks! We’d rather keep our playground!” No doubt the new facilities will be well used, but the cost has been greater than the taxes the kids will one day have to pay to service the debt.

    • Neil says:

      12:54pm | 22/12/09

      C’mon Kev, I want another $900 before Xmas or I’m going to vote for Sophie and Abbott.

    • DWest says:

      01:18pm | 22/12/09

      @Margaret and Sophie Didn’t Howard castrate the ACCC? Why don’t you preach some more free market competition? And practise pro-monopolies and anti-small business! Like Labor…I want a new MP for Xmas.

    • Humbug says:

      01:21pm | 22/12/09

      So in essence, the position taken by the Member for Indi (Liberal, Shadow Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research) is that the electorate, after years of “wisdom”, suddenly became dunces only in 2007.

      Ah yes. I suppose that *might* explain why she, as a lack-lustre member,  got re-elected.  Funny, though - wasn’t it John Winston Howard who once said “The electorate always get it right?” Hmm?

      And wasn’t it that same Howard, who, looking straight down the barrel of the lens, let slip to the national TV audience in one brief unguarded phrase, the true heart of Liberalism: “The aim of the game is to keep The Other Lot out”.

      Well. That’s that then. Oz political princples in two sentences out of one mouth.

      By the way, Ms Mirabella, your bio is well out of date on The Punch. Tut!

    • Pedro says:

      01:21pm | 22/12/09

      Our Federal politicians always like to portray the states or local councils as seperate constituents and it is highly irritating. Its as if we live on another planet far away from the federal sphere. And it is because we are over governed. Mr and Mrs Bloggs have 3 polical representatives, local, state and federal. Whatever money the feds give to the states or local councils is the same as giving to their very own constituents, just they are not getting the kudos for it personally, which is what they hate.

      SO when we hear things like this - “Ditto on the promise of “universal access” for preschool – which we now learn does not mean free preschool…but means handing close to a billion dollars to Rudd’s Labor mates in the States and Territories who created the problem in the first place.” it comes across as nothing more than sour grapes in that they couldnt hand out the money personally to get a boost in their own re election prospects. And just on that statement, did West Australia miss out on any funding? Maybe they now reside on the other planet as well now.

    • Humbug says:

      01:30pm | 22/12/09

      Ah Persephone, you’re a tonic and no mistake. Thanks for all your stuff.

      And thanks too to Alteria, IandSand and like posters, of careful, useful, civil, thought-provoking material against the tide of dopey ranting.

      Humbug signing off.

    • Margaret Gray says:

      01:41pm | 22/12/09

      Persephone,

      Thanks for conceding I was right about Kevin on all counts.

      So deliciously ironic considering the 56th illegal immigrant vessel THIS YEAR strayed into view just days ago.  A noble record for Kevin.

      “...And, yes, the Opposition party does need to have policies.  Please cite one in the history of Australian politics who have gone to the election without them…”

      Is there a Federal election happening?

      Perhaps you could tell us when it is?

    • Adam says:

      01:55pm | 22/12/09

      How condescending. Apparently the Howard government was wonderful and Australians were too stupid to realise this and were duped by Rudd. Sophie needs to let go of the bitterness, quit dropping these pathetic articles and work out that as a country, we don’t want or need Howard anymore. We have moved on and so should the Liberal Party.

    • R says:

      02:17pm | 22/12/09

      @Libbie

      “almost every commentator has said that the stimulus plan has been a massive success.”

      You’re kidding right? Most commentators I have read or heard across this and other countries thought that a) it was a waste of money we will be paying back for years and b) it was a fairly cynical popularity grab using Tax Payers money.

      Australia has faired better because the economy was in very good shape at the start of the GFC. The real test of policy will be in another three years time if (and I suspect they will) Rudd and Co win the next election and their current policies or lack thereof have time to bite.

      Don’t get me wrong I think the liberals are pretty useless at the moment as well - who to vote for is becoming an issue - an empty ‘buy popularity at all costs’ leader with a track record of broken promises or a chap that I wouldn’t let out on his own - never mind run a country.

    • Drew(Dralinghurst) says:

      02:23pm | 22/12/09

      The Liberal Howard Government (1996-2007 )spent more on WELFARE than any LABOR Govt in History….they just redirected it.

      HELLO….....“MIDDLE CLASS WELFARE”

      Enjoy Opposition Sophie….you and your Party will be there for a VERY, VERY LONG TIME.

    • persephone says:

      02:37pm | 22/12/09

      R
      you need to read more.

      As for Sophie’s bio being out of date here, don’t worry - she hasn’t updated her website, either.

      I suppose she’s too busy getting her head around ‘Innovation’ to update a few details here or there.

      Dear, dear, Margaret, what can I say? Yes, it’s a shock for you; a government which actually believes in trying to keep its promises. Try and get used to it, you might enjoy it. And at least we know that, whatever policies TA and Sophie spruik at the next election, the chances that they’d ever actually even try and deliver are nill.

      Steve, if your kids go out and get real jobs as adults, they’ll pay off their share of the debt in no time (although most of it will be paid by then, anyway). And their kids will still be using the hall. Why shouldn’t you and your kids pay for something that your grandkids and probably greatgrandkids will benefit from? Why should every generation bear the full cost of providing infrastructure which will be used by the generation after them?

      Ta, Humbug. One tries.

    • Farmer's wife says:

      02:48pm | 22/12/09

      Sophie you have enormous influence on my farm animals, every time you are on TV or other news my cows give sour milk and the hens don’t lay any eggs.
      It cant be a coincidence as this never happen when I don’t hear of see you.
      I must move the TV and PC from barn otherwise I go bankrupt.

    • Jade says:

      02:49pm | 22/12/09

      Kevin Dudd’s ratings are only so high because he keeps giving out our hard earned coin to the lower class of society and swing voters who think we are going to have a super fantastic country (with all his false promises) and all we get is a lump of coal. Everyone I talk to HATES him, so I do not know where they get the ratings from (hhm maybe they ask labor party members families and pay people 5 bucks to say they love him)

      The best thing Australia can do is to vote this arrogent little princess out, the sooner the better.

      If only you COULD all see past the shiney wrapings and ribbon that is the Labor Government.  You will all be complaining in a few years when taxes are through the roof, and you have to walk everywhere because you can’t afford a car.

    • mcdazz says:

      03:30pm | 22/12/09

      What a hypocrite you are Sophie.

      I’m not sure why you are trying to rewrite history, however most people here can remember what Howard promised and what Howard failed to deliver.

      There’s an old joke that goes:

      How do you know when a politician is lying?

      Their lips are moving.

      It’s an old joke and it clearly needs updating because it seems the biggest political liars are now resorting to publishing their lies.

      We know who the biggest hypocrite is Sophie - perhaps you should take a well needed look in the mirror.

    • mcdazz says:

      03:37pm | 22/12/09

      Why does The Punch even publish crap like Sophie Mirabellas political propaganda?

      I used to think The Punch was a great read - but now it’s turned into the New Idea (or in Sophies case, the No Idea).

    • Noddy says:

      03:59pm | 22/12/09

      Gee some Labor voters get worked up. What are you getting so worked up about mcdazz? Calm down mate…..........................

    • Darren says:

      04:18pm | 22/12/09

      Hmm charitable are we Sophie? Sophie needs to calm down and ask what would Mary MacKillop do this Christmas? I know there is some blood in the water and the smell of a feeding frenzy but drop the venom, and think about someone else this Christmas.

    • Shaun says:

      04:23pm | 22/12/09

      Oh Sophie - Rudd was dressed like tinsel but Howard was plain, old, secure brown paper wrapping? I think you forgot to mention the thorns and razors on Howard, when he removed the rights of all working Australians and effective declared war on the working classes. You seem to have a very short memory. Enjoy your next few terms in Opposition.

    • D'oh says:

      04:26pm | 22/12/09

      [face palm]
      @ mcdazz, it’s called freedom of speech precious, you know, that thing you get when you live in a democracy.  Just coz you don’t agree with something does not mean it should not be published.  Given your commenting history though, this kind of freedom must be against your ideology.  If you don’t like it, go move to North Korea, China or Venezuela.

      Besides, your mates Bob Brown, Jo-anne and Peter Lewis are regular contributors.  You don’t hear conservatives calling for them to be banned.

      Funny how it seems to always be the Left always calling for bans and censorship.  Can’t have independent thought now can we…..

    • murray says:

      06:16pm | 22/12/09

      Well, Rudd would certainly be more interesting as a heavy drinking, misogynist, foul-mouthed safe-cracking Santa.  Not sure how well it would play in the focus groups though.

    • Wombat says:

      07:53pm | 22/12/09

      Well said, T.Chong! It’s great to be rid of the Lying Rodent and his slave-traders. And Julia will make a great PM. She’s already doing most of the work anyway.
      Of course we will have to see what happens over the next few years, but how about Penny Wong for Deputy PM? The wails from the bigots and misogynists of the right will keep us all entertained for years.
      I saw an interesting comment on another site comparing the mad monk to Sarah Palin- loved by core supporters but with little appeal to moderate voters. Better get used to being in opposition, Sophie.

    • Andrew Goff says:

      10:19pm | 23/12/09

      Sophie. I’m pissed off at Rudd breaking his promises. Anyone reading the Punch already knows about them.

      Kindly now please offer an alternative set of policies.

      Merry Christmas.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @popculturechris: Meanwhile, Gotye holds no.1 for a sixth massive week in the US - "that" song has now sold over 4 million copies there.

ToryShepherd

@loupascale if the survey made you sad, probably skip the comments...

Paul Colgan

@paulwiggins @richardkendall that fountain pens yarn is a great social trend story

Paul Colgan

I like how a tip erodes so only you can use it MT “@paulwiggins: BBC News - Why are fountain pen sales rising? http://t.co/0hk2MRtf

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

When you take on a job like being Environment Minister there’s some hits you can see coming. …

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

Welcome to this week’s I Call Bullshit column. It’s a regular column that looks at skulduggery…

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

We are taught early in life that we should not question authority. We must listen to our parents, our…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter