‘As a result of industrial action this exit is closed.’ The unwelcome tiding is stuck across two massive doors in King’s Cross underground station with what appears to be yellow-and-black crime scene tape. It is not what London’s put-upon commuters want to see.

Well, cigarettes are pretty expensive these days. Photo: Getty Images

It is the first week of December and a freezing London is enduring its fourth tube strike in three months, as unions fight plans to cut jobs. Students have staged rallies and campus occupations to protest planned university tuition fee increases. The police have taken to holding protesters in cordoned-off areas for hours on end. This being Britain, the tactic is called ‘kettling’.

And cuts to the defense budget mean Britain’s flagship aircraft carrier will be axed, together with the fighter jets that took off from it. But Britain will be allowed to use a French aircraft carrier, in a deal one commentator dubbed the ‘entente frugale’. The French vessel in question – the Charles de Gaulle – recently broke down.

Welcome to Britain’s ‘age of austerity’. And alongside the tube workers, fighter jets and subsidized degrees, the straightened times could well claim another victim – the Liberal Democrats, the junior partner in Britain’s new, Conservative-led government.

In the half year since they formed a coalition government with the Conservatives, the Lib Dems have shed support at an alarming rate. In the BBC’s latest ‘poll of polls’, the Lib Dems are down to 10% from an election campaign peak of 31%. This puts the Lib Dems in a dead heat; not with Labour – which the party aspires to replace as the main centre-left force – but with ‘Other’. The Independent’s ComRes poll has support for Lib Dems at its lowest level in two years. Just as they have entered government for the first time in nearly eighty years, the Lib Dems are haemorrhaging support.

Immediately propelling the party’s strange, upward fall is its broken pledge on university tuition fees. The Lib Dems went to the May elections promising to abolish fees for British students altogether.

It was a rash promise, and it proved unable to navigate between the Scylla of fiscal retrenchment and the Charybdis of junior status in a coalition. This week, Parliament is set to vote on a government bill to nearly triple the cap on annual tuition fees which can be charged by English universities to £9,000.

The Lib Dem ‘betrayal’ has been a focus of student protesters, who have targeted the party’s Westminster headquarters. Their chant bespoke the dwindling of the idealistic student support that Lib Dems long counted on: ‘Nick Clegg, we know you, you’re a f—king Tory too.’ Effigies of Clegg – which Lib Dem leaders past might have accepted as signs that they had at least been recognised – have hanged and burned in the pre-winter frost.

But the cause of the party’s problems is broader than one issue. The poll spiral began long before the fees promise was broken in October.

Essentially, the Lib Dems have long drawn support as a party of protest – a sort of one-stop repository for various soft left and libertarian causes. At national elections, people voted for them on the understanding that their policies (some sensible, some not) would never be implemented – at least not by the Lib Dems.

‘They [the voters] know there isn’t some fantasy government where nothing difficult ever happens’, Tony Blair once quipped. ‘They’ve got the Lib Dems for that.’ But now they don’t even have that. Tried in the fire of government for the first time in living memory, the Lib Dems are being weighed by once-loyal supporters and found wanting.

Few Lib Dem voters would have expected the generally left-leaning party to go into government with the Conservatives. They did not vote for the Tory agenda of public sector cuts and private volunteerism now being implemented with Lib Dem support.

It all feels much more than half a year since the election campaign that Nick Clegg starred in. Back then, Clegg tapped into public anger over politics as usual in the wake of the MPs expenses scandal.

He repeatedly condemned the ‘two old parties’ for running a self-serving political duopoly. This was something of a conceit. Of the movements that united to form the Lib Dems, the Liberals were William Gladstone’s party and the Social Democrats were disaffected Labour members (‘splitters’, as Reg from the People’s Front of Judea would put it).

Hailed as the ‘British Obama’ and found by one poll to be the most popular party leader since Winston Churchill, Clegg parlayed a creditable debate performance into remarkable popularity. ‘I agree with Nick’, said Gordon Brown, the beleaguered prime minister, repeatedly. So, according to the polls, did much of the country. T-shirts were quickly rushed out to prove it.

There was talk of the Lib Dems relegating Labour to third place in the popular vote. Reports had Clegg preparing to demand the prime ministership as the price of any post-election deal with Labour.

But when the votes were counted, the Lib Dems came their usual, distant third and actually lost seats. Deprived of an electoral breakthrough, the party’s leaders opted to govern in tandem with the Conservatives. So office gained, but in tough times and tough circumstances.

‘A new dawn has broken, has it not?’, Tony Blair asked the gathered Labour Party faithful as the sun rose on the 2nd of May, 1997. Eighteen years of Tory rule had just been emphatically ended.

For much of this year’s election campaign, the Lib Dems seemed on the cusp of an equally dramatic breakthrough. Just now, however, there is a sense that the much-heralded new dawn of Liberal Democracy came unexpectedly early, and it may already be dusk.

‘There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things’.

Nick Clegg is probably with Machiavelli on that one.

Most commented

50 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Drew(Darlinghurst) says:

      05:16am | 07/12/10

      Its very similar to the Australian Democrats lost all their support from the centre when they supported HOWARD’S GST in 1998.

      The Howard Government was the highest taxing government in History, let us not forget that.

      Cheers

    • Macca says:

      06:51am | 07/12/10

      “The Howard Government was the highest taxing government in History, let us not forget that.”

      I’m sure that has nothing to do with the ridiculous economic strength of the Howard years at all.

    • dovif says:

      07:18am | 07/12/10

      Drew( (Darlinghurst)

      Actually if you had bothered to check the tax take in every budget, you would have found out that the 20010 ALP was the highest taxing government in Australian history, and that was before their super profit tax, so do not let facts get in the way of your (lack) of argument

      Additionally like Howard in 1995, the UK is recovering from years of Labour/ALP rule which had ruin the budget, and created record deficits, which led to massive unemployment, when the country can no longer live beyond its mean. This is exactly the same path that the current ALP government is taking, we already had a record deficit in year 2 of this ALP government.

      So GB at the moment are having the same problems that Australia had after Keating and Australia will have after Rudd/Gillard

    • Jesse says:

      10:59pm | 07/12/10

      Macca, the only reason the economic strength was so good is that he was sucking away everything owned by the people, through extra taxes, selling our assets and allowing the mining companies to make huge profits from the Australian people’s minerals. Nuff said.

    • mat says:

      07:17am | 10/12/10

      Nuclear naval threats? Like you in Australia would know anything about that? Stick to sledging in cricket (which you’re losing, alas), rather than ever judging a nation on its judgement on nuclear firepower, which any sane person knows to be insane and unnecessary. I lived 3 years in Sydney and not once did I meet a local of anywhere near a global interest, so self satisfied were they. You are a piddling tiny concern in geo politics, as are the UK (with 3 times the population) - deal with it, noone gives a toss if you live or die.

    • Macca says:

      06:52am | 07/12/10

      The Behaviour of the students in The Uk is utterly disgraceful.

      These children don’t need an education, they need a cell

    • Martin G says:

      08:26am | 07/12/10

      Yes, imagine having to pay for your own tertiary education!

      Welcome to the real world, boys and girls. Life isn’t a big free lunch.

    • Chase Stevens says:

      08:37am | 07/12/10

      Yes lets lock up protesters. Because that’s sane.

    • Macca says:

      09:29am | 07/12/10

      @Chase, their is a difference between peacefully protesting and violent vandalism and assualt

    • Muttley says:

      09:41am | 07/12/10

      Not quite Chase. Lets lock up VIOLENT protesters. Because THAT is sane.

    • Stephen Fitzpatrick says:

      11:55am | 07/12/10

      Yes indeed, the days of free lunches are over for good!

      Not that anyone who comments here, or any of the politicians who make these decisions, ever got a free university education, that would be hypocritical.

    • michael j says:

      01:10pm | 07/12/10

      FREE education,kids should’not subsist in
      poverty because of some greedy barstard’s
      trying to feather their superation fund
      the goverments behaviour is disgraceful
      KIDS stick it barstards,no one eles will
      always stand up for yourselves
      weell done!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

    • Philip Crowley says:

      09:04pm | 07/12/10

      Michael J…. I certainly hope you didn’t pay for your education Sir. Your grammar is absolutely appalling! Also, applauding the looting of a city reflects quite badly on one’s character, don’t you think?

    • majority says:

      07:38am | 07/12/10

      Drew. How is this comment about tax relevant to the article? Not.

    • Drew(Darlinghurst) says:

      08:23am | 07/12/10

      Its related to the issue of GST. An issue that led to the demise of the Australian Democrats.

      The Australian Democrats moved to the RIGHT

      Just like the Lib-Dems in their dirty coalition with the Tories.

      SNAP

    • dovif says:

      10:14am | 07/12/10

      Drew

      You must have been really happy at the ALP lying their way to winning the 1992 election on the GST that Keating proposed to caucus 5 years earlier

      You must really believe the ALP were going to roll back the GST

      What the ALP embraced the GST agter they reached office? The World Bank thinks the GST should be 17.5%? The GST is in almost every tax jurisdiction in the world including Hong Kong and Singapore?

      All those lying, and scare campaign by the ALP must be eating you up inside

    • Martin G says:

      11:37am | 07/12/10

      Either the GST or Income Tax must be scrapped. It is disgraceful that the Government can continue to double-dip (tax my pay, then tax the goods and services that I purchase with the remainder).

      I guess the ALP need some more money from me so they can waste it on white elephants and their overseas junkets. Not that the Coalition are much better, but at least they didn’t frivolously spend the extra income. Ah well I guess it enjoys bi-partisan support because it is only ripping off Joe Consumer…

    • Dan says:

      12:10pm | 07/12/10

      Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t part of the reason for the demise of the Democrats post-GST not simply because they ultimately supported its passage, but that the parliamentary party was bitterly split over it ... followed by the ongoing spat between Stott Despoja and Meg Lees.

      Add to that Bartlett’s behaviour as leader and I think that would be enough to bleed your base - whether you moved to the centre/right or not.

    • Taxpayer says:

      07:41am | 07/12/10

      The left are expert at spending other people’s money, but have no idea how to pay it back.  We are facing exactly the same problem in Australia.

    • Chase Stevens says:

      08:42am | 07/12/10

      And the right are experts on cutting vital services to the poor and most disadvantaged in society. Luckily we were spared that.

    • salo says:

      12:04pm | 07/12/10

      ‘The left’? Name them. There is no left wing party in government in Australia. Certainly, the ALP is not left.

    • michael j says:

      05:00pm | 07/12/10

      if you mean to vote to vote for this
      goverment again why?
      every one i know is broke and
      i wont be votin 4 the tory sellout
      bars—ds again ever

    • PK says:

      07:53am | 07/12/10

      And the same thing might happen to the Lib Dems that happened to Aust Dems - electoral oblivion.

    • AdamC says:

      08:25am | 07/12/10

      This is a pretty good assessment of the Lib Dems. But I am more interested in the antics of the students and unions. What’s the story; are the 1970s back in fashion or something?

      Increasingly, coddled state workers, students and other state-supported groups seem to have become so far removed from what might indelicately be called ‘real life’, that they seem to have completely forgotten that someone actually has to pay for their perks and benefits. This is a global or, at least, European and Anglosphere phenomenon.

      Perhaps governments should be even tougher with their cuts to break the embedded culture of entitlement and privilege.

      PS, Drew from Darlinghurst, the idea that the Aus Dems lost their support over the GST is political myth, not political history. The Aus Dems did fairly well in the post-GST 2001 election. They destroyed themselves after that with their ridiculous infighting and totalitarian party disciplinary shenanigans.

    • Scott says:

      09:56am | 07/12/10

      “Increasingly, coddled state workers, students and other state-supported groups seem to have become so far removed from what might indelicately be called ‘real life’, that they seem to have completely forgotten that someone actually has to pay for their perks and benefits. “

      With regards to students, at least, education is hardly a ‘perk’ or ‘benefit’. The problem is that these people are paying the cost for a crisis that wasn’t of their making. These costs should be recuperated from the big end of town.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      10:04am | 07/12/10

      Of course the fact that these government budget cuts are to pay for the financial bail out of British and Irish bank problems. But then someone has to pay for their perks and benefits and it ain’t going to be the banks that caused the financial crisis. Perhaps the governments should be tougher with their regulation of the financial industry “to break the embedded culture of entitlement and privilege”

    • David C says:

      10:34am | 07/12/10

      The annual tuition for a first year UK student studying engineering at Oxford is GBP 3,000 (AUD aprox $5,000) Sort of puts it all in perspective when you compare to Australian uni fees

    • Richard says:

      10:45am | 07/12/10

      Interesting that you should hark back to the 1970’s AdamC, because by the looks of the recent GDP growth figures released last week, and today’s inflation figures, it seems abundantly apparent to me that Australia has indeed be revisited by that iconic 1970’s institution: stagflation.

      ~ Thanks Wayne Swan.

      You know isn’t it ironic that the left accuses Tony Abbott of wanting to “time-warp” Australia back to the 1950’s: a time of unprecedented peace and prosperity in our national history; whilst all the while, the left’s implementation of discredited Keynesian economic policies and pathetic pandering to unions has “time-warped” us all back to the 70’s: a period of insipid stagnation and runaway inflation.

      And despite all the temper-tantrums by poor oppressed uni students in the UK, you’ll actually find that, (contrary to the expectation of orthodox economists) the austerity program in England is is already paying tangible dividends. It seems that, gasp/splutter, if the public sector shrinks its voracious appetite for finite capital, the end result is that more is available to the productive private sector, which is able to flourish once again, and start generating real wealth instead of just endless tangles of bureaucratic red tape. Whowouldathunkit?

    • Heath Karl says:

      10:55am | 07/12/10

      suddenly gettting a tertiary education because the economy demands it is a perk, a benefit and a privilege.

      Working class people dont go to university for intellectual stimuli, they go to get a professional job, because there are professional jobs available, because modern economics requires professionals. This is real life.
      And what kind of internet contributer uses post-script? what is this, the 1950s back in fashion or something?

    • bella starkey says:

      11:10am | 07/12/10

      @ David C: most australian HECS fees are about this much.

      It depends on the number of subjects you take but that is pretty standard

    • AdamC says:

      12:57pm | 07/12/10

      Scott and Shane, I can understand the frustration all Britons’ must have at paying more taxes and/or enduring cuts to pay for (among other things) bank bailouts. However, complaining about it doesn’t solve the problem and, in any event, it seems that those complaining the loudest still enjoy quite generous benefits from government largesse.

      Richard, ha, yes. Back to the 1970s in a number of ways it seems. To be fair, the new coalition government in the UK is showing admirable contrariness in rejecting the Keynesian excesses which have failed to rescue Obama’s US, among others.

      Heath Karl, there’s nothing wrong with PSs online, and your comment makes no sense.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      01:58pm | 07/12/10

      @Richard. Umm, no. The austerity program in Ireland which has run longer than England’s program has failed to correct their problem. Ireland will still need a bail-out from the European Union. Also even if more “finite capital” is transferred from the public sector to private sector there is no guarantee that the private sector will engage in expansion. The current economic situation in the United States is a prime example where private sector profits are at record high but unemployment is still high and expansion is non existent.

    • Richard says:

      02:47pm | 07/12/10

      Shane from Melbourne, you are completely misrepresenting the situations in Ireland and the US in relation to my comment about UK’s austerity program.

      In Ireland, the problems came about when their banks used the adoption of new Euro currency (and hence access to much cheaper money in the bond markets) as an excuse to go on a huge credit-lending binge (in much the same way as our banks have done in Australia incidentally). Well, these kind of big credit binge bubbles never end well, and Ireland’s went ‘pop’ in 2008. But instead of letting the financial institutions go bankrupt, which would have eliminated all the toxic debt from the financial system, the corrupt Government bailed them out and transferred all that debt onto the public’s balance sheet, essentially putting the everyday Irish tax-payer on the hook for the foolish excesses of the banking big wigs. The debt is such a massive burden on the Irish citizens that no amount of austerity will ever be able to pay it off, they are now just debt mules whose whole existence is now enslaved into the necessity to pay exorbitant interest on the every increasing principal for as long as it takes until the Irish government does the right thing by its electors and defaults on the dirty debt.

      In the USA, the private sector profits you talk about come almost exclusively from the big banks like JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs ripping off the American people abetted their corrupt accomplices in Washington. Basically every financial and economic problem in the world today is caused by governments and their plutocratic bedfellows, the big banksters.

    • Ros says:

      08:47am | 07/12/10

      “It was a rash promise, and it proved unable to navigate between the Scylla of fiscal retrenchment and the Charybdis of junior status in a coalition.” Thank you, Stephen, for using the classical version of a rock and a hard place. So much more lyrical - I think we should bring it back into everyone’s vocabulary.

    • Richard The Lionheart says:

      10:06am | 07/12/10

      The Lib-Dems were the fairies at the bottom of the garden. Now they are in the big house where years of Labour ineptitude has to be paid for. Underground drivers are now paid more than first -officer pilots. The union has been allowed run amuck for years. With Europe at the centre of financial instability, students and everyone else has to realise if they want something they have to pay for it. Government bail out days are over. The welfare- state days are numbered. This goes for Australia. Punters from now on will be disappointed in every middle to left Govt. they elect. The growth of the right wing parties in Europe will continue apace with unknown outcomes. The Lib-Dems are finished. Clegg is a Tory at heart and from a very wealthy elitest family. Any Government now has to run along the same lines as a family budget. One goes without, one has to sacrifice.

    • Heath Karl says:

      10:57am | 07/12/10

      Fascism is not an ‘unknown outcome’.

    • RT says:

      12:07pm | 07/12/10

      Australia is nothing like the UK. Here, we still have something to sell that the world wants to pay us a lot for. We just need to get a proper cut of the action and spend it wisely.

    • Fatphil says:

      10:24am | 07/12/10

      @ Ros, I love a good classical reference myself. Scylla is the rock: Charybdiis a Whirlpool.  So… between a rock and a slippery slope would be as good an interpretation as any (and quite apt) I am thankful that I don’t have to pronounce them though. My education certainly wasn’t classical enough for that.

    • Kristy Venson says:

      10:34am | 07/12/10

      If you look at the people who are protesting you will notice most are from another country maybe they are upset due to having the welfare removed from underneath them. This is what people in the UK are on about, people from other countries becoming citizens and then as a result they need to remove this support system to help gain an education due to the amount of immigrants and their children using the system. UK did not think ahead did they.

    • Andrew says:

      10:44am | 07/12/10

      These students are the social equivalent of a child sceaming “I want I want I want!!” as loudly as they can in a crowded shopping center, seemingly oblivious to the fact that both their parents have both recently lost their jobs and can no longer afford to buy them their lollies.  Times are tough in England, and getting out of that situation will require sacrifice, hard work, and restraint.  Handouts and more “money for nothing” will certainly not solve the problem.  So perhaps it’s time for the petulant children to grow up and realise that whilst some things like free tertiary education are certainly desirable, it is simply not possible at this time.  Perhaps a good smack on the bum would do them some good?  Or even better, give them the balance sheet for the country, and ask them to choose which other services should be cut to pay for their “rights”.

    • Stephen Fitzpatrick says:

      12:10pm | 07/12/10

      Actually I think they are screaming “I just want what the generation before me had!” They are also probably a little pissed off because, whilst one parent has lost their job in the public sector, the other parent kept their banking job becuase the bank, badly managed by wealthy grandparents, was bailed out by the government, putting the government in debt and causing the austerity measures which resulted in the first parent losing their job.

    • The Shag says:

      12:54pm | 07/12/10

      Eventually every nation pays a price for a Labor government. Theirs is being paid now, ours is yet to come again. Lets just hope the greens go the way of the LibDem’s. It started in Victoria and if the Libs continue to preference them last they are a spent force..

    • Expat says:

      06:09pm | 07/12/10

      The Liberal Democrats are paying the price for siding with the Tories. If the Greens side with the Coalition, they know they’ll suffer the same fate that the Australian Democrats did for doing so. And also, if the Coalition preference them last, why would the Greens side with them ?

    • jane wallace says:

      05:48pm | 07/12/10

      the young voters and middle aged voters have hated the Liberals and Democrats for years in Ausrtralia.
      Yet the old senile Australian voters still give votes to the infantile Liberals and the dead wood Democrats.
      The old people have the idiot gene .
      Their age limits Your comment:

    • lance boyels of bayswater says:

      09:01pm | 07/12/10

      while i agree its the young and foolish who vote labour jane most middle age people i know are a bit to clever to vote labour as for the elderly being senile maybe they is just a bit more experienced in life than you and know a bit more . i used to think and vote like you but then i grew up . by the way is it really necessary to insult the elderly yes i know they dont look to good smell funny and drive to slow but it was there work and taxes that paid for the the country you are enjoying now

    • jane wallace says:

      05:55pm | 07/12/10

      nick clegg & tony abbott are two of a kind. They are hopeless dead wood.
      without the mass media and old people they would get no votes.
      They avoid the Labor Party as they avoid common sense,common people and the common touch like the plague.
      The Liberals are Conservatives, nothing more and nothing less.
      Love Fibs & Vote Libs

    • nosthow says:

      08:21pm | 07/12/10

      @Jane - poetry Jane sheer poetry ! Keep this up and we shall be dating ! Wow !

    • DocBud says:

      10:39pm | 07/12/10

      Abso-bloody-lutely, Jane. Why the hell do we give the vote to old people so they can misuse it by voting for Abbott? Once people reach 40 they should be denied the vote unless they agree to vote rationally, i.e. vote ALP. Maybe young people should only get the vote when they agree to vote for the ALP, heaven forbid anyone should show independent thought and vote for a (starts to throw up) Conservative party, how evil.

    • Sven Gali says:

      09:18am | 08/12/10

      Hear hear, DocBud.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter