Food producers love a good study, particularly one that finds that some ingredient or trace element in their product has some miraculous property found to cure cancer in rats.

A group of health enthusiasts with their special beer-carrying receptacle.

Such studies are guaranteed to make headlines around the world and lead to an aura being cast over their product. The wine industry in particular is the master of the self-serving study, with red wine being attributed all sorts of miraculous properties that should see it treated like the waters at Lourdes.

The chocolate industry has also discovered the value of good publicity and the media has recently reported chocolate manufacturing giants Mars and Barry Callebaut AG have announced a cross-industry partnership to promote the health benefits of cocoa flavanols.

The report says:

“Flavanols are a type of flavonoid - chemicals with antioxidant properties, found in green tea, berries, fruits, vegetables and red wine.  Cocoa flavanols have been shown to improve blood circulation, protect skin from the effects of UV and potentially improve brain function.”

After more talk about the miracles of cocoa flavonols and the patented process pioneered by Mars which makes their chocolate better than any others, the article finally concludes with the warning:

“Critics warn that while the health benefits of flavanols are clear, the health-conscious should be careful when adding extra calories alongside. “An ounce of dark chocolate delivers about 150 calories. Eat that much every day without cutting back elsewhere and the girth you gain would far outweigh any benefit from chocolate.” says Dr. Thomas Lee, editor in chief, Harvard Heart Letter.

One hundred and fifty calories in an ounce of dark chocolate is 630 kilojoules in 28 grams of chocolate. As a beer lover I automatically convert that to a beery equivalent. It would take roughly 380mls of an average full-strength lager beer—slightly less than two standard drinks—to consume that many calories. Eat dark chocolate as a ‘medicine’, which is indirectly what the chocolate company is hinting you do, and you would probably want the improved circulation the flavonols provide as you waddle around the hospital ward after your gastric banding procedure.

The beer industry seems to have also discovered the benefits of a good study, with an ever increasing number pointing to beer being good for you and even better than wine in many areas.

Just this last week a study from the University of California, Davis made international headlines because it found that some beers could be rich in silicon. The study does no more than look at the amount of silicon that can be found in beer, but that didn’t stop many media outlets making the hoped-for health connection and reporting that dietary silicon might contribute to bone health. Some even suggested beer could prevent osteoporosis.

Not surprisingly the research was led by the Anheuser-Busch Endowed Professor of Malting and Brewing Sciences; Anheuser Busch brew Budweiser the world’s most valuable beer brand.

Still, for the beer drinker, the news has got to be good excellent. Pale ales—one of this writer’s favourite—were found to be particularly rich in silicon. The average pale ale contains 36.5 milligrams of silicon per litre of beer. With such an impressive dose of silicon, you might ask yourself what percentage of your daily requirements that would be. I did and rushed off to find out.

The Australian National Health and Medical Research Council publishes the Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand Including Recommended Dietary Intakes which details the recommended daily intakes for  more than 40 nutrients, covering everything from Vitamin A to Zinc including such well-known vitamins and minerals as biotin, choline and molybdenum.

So what is the RDI for silicon?  There isn’t one. Why?

“In addition to the nutrients listed above, the Working Party also reviewed the literature on…arsenic, boron, nickel, silicon and vanadium. For these nutrients …it was agreed that there was little or no evidence for their essentiality in humans. This was generally in line with the findings of the US:Canadian DRI review recommendations. However, the DRI reviews set upper limits for some of these nutrients.”

Referring to the Canadian site, there is similarly no recommendation, just a note saying: “Although silicon has not been shown to cause adverse effects in humans, there is no justification for adding silicon to supplements.”

So to get 36.5 milligrams of silicon, for which there is no demonstrable dietary need, I need to drink a litre of beer—the equivalent of 5 standard drinks and more than 1700 kilojoules – almost a fifth of my daily requirement.

So what was the point of the study? Very little apart from the publicity it seems. Despite appearing in the Sydney Morning Herald under the heading “Beer benefits bone density: study”, the article goes on to quote the lead researcher, Professor Charles Bamforth, who “told reporters that the results shouldn’t be taken too seriously. The study examined the beers but it did not look at bone mineral density or analyse patients’ data.”

“I would first consider flavour and whether you like it or not,” he told science and technology magazine Discover. “Choose the beer you enjoy, for goodness sake.”

And there’s the best piece of advice from the whole study.

Beer does contain minerals and nutrients that are good for you, but it also has alcohol which, in any more than moderate amounts, can cause harm that far outweighs any nutritive benefit. You simply cannot consume the amount of beer needed to enjoy the benefits of the vitamins and other nutrients without, at best, also getting a huge dose of empty kilojoules and, at worst, the negative health impacts associated with excessive alcohol consumption.

So, when you next reach for a beer, don’t think of it as a vitamin pill and cancer cure in a bottle. Reach for the one that brings you the greatest satisfaction from its flavour and enjoy it, in moderation, simply for being the great drink that it is. Enjoy the pleasure that beer and good company bring. That’s the true tonic of beer.

One for the weekend

Stone & Wood Brewery
Draught Ale
330ml 4.4% abv

The perfect beach beer.

In carving out a niche for themselves against the big beer producers, Australia’s microbrewers have enlisted flavour as their weapon of choice. Brewing smaller batches and requiring a smaller market to make their products viable, these brewers have the luxury to be able to experiment with styles and flavours. This has led to many microbrewers going the way of huge flavours that justifiably generate excitement amongst the growing legion of ‘beer geeks’ but can prove to be a little challenging for the average beer-loving Australian.

The team at Byron Bay’s Stone & Wood Brewery set themselves a challenge with their first beer: to create a beer that had lots of flavour but at the same time was enjoyable and didn’t need to be approached as feat of endurance to finish. A beer to be enjoyed, fresh, at the beach. They have succeeded.

Draught ale is an unfiltered, unpasteurised ale. Between its golden colour and yeast-induced haze, the beer looks to be glowing almost unnaturally - like the over-whitened smile of a modern TV star. But this beauty is all natural. The beer is dominated by big fruit hop aromas but there is also a solid pale malt base and carefully tied bitterness. It is interesting, complex and appealing all at the same time. This is the ideal beer for balmy Byron Bay evenings and, now it has been released in bottles, look out for it nationally and drink it in good health.

14 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • jamo ramone says:

      02:15am | 06/03/10

      fair enough if it’s independent, unbiased study, but if these so-called “facts” are coming from manufactrers, would you still believe them? either way i don’t care if it stops m getting bowel cancer or gives me a good vitamin boose, or thickens my blood, or can reduce my chance of alzheimers. i still will not drink alcohol, its effectively poisonous in my eyes. and before you say anything, im 18 and im a man, not a religious nut or a recovered alcoholic or an old fogey or a politician or a doctor or health freak.

    • OldGirl says:

      10:39am | 06/03/10

      I am old darlin, old as Uluru, I have one wicked vice. I love chocolate. I am not fat and don’t really over eat , but everytime the tell me chocolate is good for me, I must admit, I run and grab aother caramello koala. I think its probably all a ploy to get us to eat and drink more. But chocolate is a such a feel good food

    • DocBud says:

      10:02am | 07/03/10

      “its effectively poisonous in my eyes. and before you say anything, im 18 and im a man, not a religious nut or a recovered alcoholic or an old fogey or a politician or a doctor or health freak.”

      Just a bog-standard, ordinary, apostrophe-hating nut and freak then.

    • No Brainer says:

      08:34am | 10/03/10

      There’s an old adage that goes something like this… “The first casualty of war is the truth!” Well, tragically in the age of corporate war waged for the ruthless acquisition of profit, you are going to have the same problem. Weapons in this war are as bombastic as any other; propaganda is discharged with the smart bomb of spin!  I know it sounds almost conspiratorial don’t it… but that’s why I agree with Julie Coker-Godson… Some minute, purported ‘beneficial’ byproduct of a substance under cultural siege is going to be spun with extraordinary pace. All to try and reassure, not so much the occasional imbibing connoisseur, but the unwittingly addicted, that there is some benefit to this toxin, other than inebriation and possible ‘taste’! And yes, all this data should be thoroughly tested and screened by independent Lab’s to ensure we are getting the ‘Gospel’, not the ‘spin’. At least Matt has demonstrated integrity in this article… bravo mate!  Many may not know this but as early as 1990 the AMA along with the then ‘National Committee on Violence” put forward to an unambiguous recommendation to Government, that ‘All advertising of alcohol on Television and Radio be stopped!” Ah, but the ‘Doctor’s prescription’ wasn’t taken under advisement…. Tooooo much money to be made by too few and the cost of the many!

    • davido says:

      03:19am | 06/03/10

      The partisan authors behind these types of studies keep bringing the studies out because they know their gullible consumers will grasp at any excuse to consume these ‘guilty’ products.

      Is the second half of this article advertising?

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      02:13pm | 06/03/10

      Now this, Davido, I agree wholeheartedly with you on.  I get so fed up with these sorts of “medical studies” being published, it seems, in ever increasing frequency.  There should be a ban by the AMA on these ever being published unless they can be properly substantiated by the genuine medical profession.  There are many consumers who will be confused by these reports and, if it pertains to anything they enjoy eating, they will take it as read that it is OK to consume “these “guilty” products”.  If the reports are to be published, then the persons/groups/industry sponsoring the report should be in big capital letters so we can see where it is coming from and whether or not there is any bias.  BTW Davido, I do suspect the second half is advertising.  Perhaps the author of this article could clarify for us?

    • jamo ramone says:

      04:58pm | 06/03/10

      @davido: my point indeed, people seem to like an excuse to do or consume “risque” items or activities, alcohol included.  im glad to see some of us arent fooled:)
      @old girl:  ooh vices are fine, i have no problem with them. it’s only human to have something like that, i think mine is probably listenign to extreme music and all kinds of other stuff, yours chocolate, others cigarettes, etc. i just dont like alcohol, love chocolate though raspberry p.s.: i meant no offence about the “age” comment, i just meant it in the sense that some older people look down on my generation when they also were young and wild once:)

    • Beer Matt says:

      08:03am | 07/03/10

      @davido & @Julie Coker-Godson. The second half isn’t advertising, I always include a beer beer review in my columns for The Punch under the title ‘One for the Weekend’. I am an independent beer writer and have no association with any breweries. It is a positive review but would you want to me to review a bad beer in a column called ‘One for the Weekend’?

    • DocBud says:

      10:16am | 07/03/10

      Thankfully, Julie, the AMA does not have the authority to ban things it doesn’t like. If you think that research having been carried out by medical practioners is a guarantee that it unbiased and truthful then it is you who are confused. Ditto with respect to the AMA not having a (nannyish) political agenda.

      I prefer to assume that grown adults are capable of making their own decisions based on whatever information they choose. If they feel confused, they can seek advice if they wish. What is not needed is people like you advocating that we trample over free speech and arrogantly presuming that “many consumers” need protection (though not you of course).

    • Tony says:

      11:02am | 06/03/10

      Based on this peice of mastery, here is what I suggest if you want to stay fit and healthy:

      1/ Start your night with a few cold, enjoyable beers.
      2/ Now, proceed to the RED.
      3/ Finish with a nice Port companioned by some dark chocolate.

      OK, forget I ever mentioned fittness…..

    • jamo ramone says:

      09:44pm | 06/03/10

      @tony: oh definitely, i eat plenty of chocolate and drink plenty of red wine and beer. but im not unhealthy, it has stuff in it that’s good for me!
      haha hope you saw the saracasm? nah i seriously hope there arent people out there who believe it to the point where they use it as a replacement for genuinely healthy thinks like being fit.

    • stephen says:

      12:23pm | 06/03/10

      Unfortunately I’m one of those gullible consumers. I like beer. My bartender says it’s good for me. (“Drink up…have another”)  Pale Ale’s not bad either Mr Matt, though it is a little acidy. (The red stuff’s better.)
      I like pubs. Plenty of jovial bonhommie, specially round the pool-table and juke-box (love hyphens), and when the shout comes around, i’m outside staring at that bloody moon again.
      No worries, and if i get into strife, I’ll take up caramello koalas.
      By the way, I’ll try that new drop, though the label does look old-hat.

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      03:22pm | 07/03/10

      @DocBud says:11:16am | 07/03/10

      “.....I prefer to assume that grown adults are capable of making their own decisions based on whatever information they choose. If they feel confused, they can seek advice if they wish. What is not needed is people like you advocating that we trample over free speech and arrogantly presuming that “many consumers” need protection (though not you of course). “

      I did not advocate “that we trample over free speech…” nor did I “arrogantly “presume that “many consumers” need protection”.  What I do advocate is a modicum of responsibility in the publishing of these sorts of reports and if that means getting the science behind them, then so be it.  I think that constant contradictory medical reports abut foods that are generally considered not good for us healthwise does nothing to solve the situation or make it any clearer.  Arrogance does not come into it and I don’t know where in my post that you thought that it did.  I would like you to explain via The Punch just exactly what is your definition of “people like you” as such comment pertains to myself.  BTW I am entitled to express a different view to you without the personal insults.  Play the issue, not the person.

    • DocBud says:

      08:26am | 08/03/10

      “People like you”, Julie, would be anyone who demands new regulations whenever they perceive the need to protect other grown adults from themselves.

      “There should be a ban by the AMA on these ever being published”. That would be advocating trampling on free speech.

      “There are many consumers who will be confused by these reports”. If you want that not to sound arrogant then you need to say something like: “I, and I suspect other consumers, may be confused…”.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

tory_maguire

Because she's a prostitute? @dobellthommo: "To buy a story from a prostitute is chequebook journalism at its worst."

ToryShepherd

What about Weet-Bix? “@Slate: How to make pork-infused veggies: http://t.co/ZYOOxVVT

Lucy Kippist

@christoforpaine sorry! Actually thought I already was... Weird?

Lucy Kippist

@dreshubby you wont know until you try!

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Lying on a cold table in an unfamiliar place and undergoing a core biopsy was probably one of the most…

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

Red alert, ladies. Making jokes about your ability at work is not funny particularly at board level.…

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Punishing the baddies is only fun in the movies. In real life it’s messy, expensive, and fraught…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter