US cable network HBO has never been one to shy away from the profane; dramas like Rome and True Blood have featured almost-weekly screenings of sex and nudity throughout their respective seasons; but with Hung, HBO might well have jumped the shark.

Sex and nudity on TV is all well and good but do we really need a show that revolves around the size of a character’s member? The premise behind Showtime’s Californication is flimsy enough – a sex addict has sex with lots of women – but Hung takes lowbrow television to an all-time low.

What I wouldn’t give to have been a fly on the wall when Hung’s creators, Dmitry Lipkin and Colette Burson, met with HBO to pitch the show;

HBO exec: So, what’s the show about?
Creators: Well, it’s about this guy who’s down on his luck and struggling through the recession.
HBO exec: Ok, sounds good so far. So what does he do?
Creators: Well he tries being a basketball coach for a while but that doesn’t work out for him.
HBO exec: So what happens then?
Creators: Well, a friend convinces him to become a prostitute; you know, a gigolo?
HBO exec: Ok…
Creators: Yeah, and it’s great because he’s really well hung and so we’re calling the show Hung.

Of course you can spin this anyway you like. In an appearance on The View, Hung’s lead, Thomas Jane, told a couch-full of giggle-prone hosts that the show represents an attempt to reverse the normal roles seen in TV shows about prostitutes; that is, why not have a male prostitute and a female pimp? You could even argue that Hung is a “subtle study of modern adulthood in difficult economic times”, as the LA Times’ Mary McNamara does.

But schoolyard humour furnished with attempts at nuanced analysis is still schoolyard humour; Hung is still just a show about a guy with an abnormally large penis.

Of course there’s nothing really new about Hung; it’s been screening in the US since June last year and doing reasonably well for itself. It is, however, new to Australian viewers thanks to the infinite wisdom of the Seven Network’s programming directors.

For those of us that tuned in to Seven’s Sunday night screening of Forgetting Sarah Marshall it was almost impossible to avoid the promos for the Australian premier of Hung on June 21. One particularly unsubtle promo ran thus;

Woman: I hear you’ve got a big one…
Man: There’s one way to find out. (unzipping his pants…)

I enjoy a good dick joke as much as the next guy but an entire show built around such a joke? It’s almost as cringe-worthy as giving your main characters the surname “Rafter” just so that you can call your show Packed to the Rafters. 

Haven’t Australian audiences had enough of being patronised by shows that are designed to appeal to their basest interests? Surely I’m not the only one that cringes when promos for Desperate Housewives and Cougar Town come on.

Of course the classic retort “if you don’t like it, don’t watch it” is particular apt here, and one that I’m prepared to heed. That said, it does seem that shows like Hung say a lot about commercial TV networks in Australia and how they see their audiences.

Firstly, it’s far cheaper for Seven to buy shows from overseas than finance “home-grown” Aussie shows which might (Thank God You’re Here) or might not (Packed to the Rafters) be better quality than their US imports.

Secondly, as Seven boss David Leckie explained publicly back in February, Seven really doesn’t care how good programs like Cougar Town are, as long as they are rating well and, therefore, providing a sizeable audience for advertisers to tap into. This sort of contempt for the viewing public should be reason enough to make viewers sceptical when commercial TV networks start flogging their cheap, imported, poor quality goods.

It goes without saying that I won’t be watching Hung when it premiers next week and, with any luck, I won’t be the only one. One can only hope that low ratings figures will prompt Seven to realise that Australians want better television than American dick jokes from a show that ran last year. Of course, I’m not holding my breath.

85 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Scraping the barrel says:

      07:26am | 18/06/10

      A documentary on cheese making would be more interesting

    • CSallen says:

      11:45am | 18/06/10

      good idea! I’ll pitch it to HBO

    • Ngaire says:

      07:36am | 19/06/10

      Already seen the whole season of ‘Hung’ (middle of last year actually) and no, it isn’t a nasty show, there are quite a few chuckles along the way but don’t think it would have be signed on for another season. Something different, nothing spectacular. I am predicting they air a few episodes then it will disappear without a whimper.

    • GG says:

      08:32am | 19/06/10

      Hung aired on Austar quite a few months ago,I watched a few episodes and then it disapeared! It was OK, but HBO has far better shows. Trueblood is brilliant!

    • Nick says:

      07:28am | 18/06/10

      Don’t panic, I’m sure Senator Conroy and his rosary beads are already drafting legislation to ban it. He’s about to release a study on advertising standards and whether ads today are too raunchy for the kiddies. Given his form to date, it doesn’t take a genius to guess what its findings will be.

      And yes, Channel Seven does consistently appeal to the lowest common denominator. Apart from the odd 6pm news bulletin, I can’t honestly say I watch any Seven shows.

    • T.Chong says:

      08:17am | 18/06/10

      Well nick, after that irrevalant slag at Conroy,  Im pretty sure youll be watching -,hanging out for Hung, in a true blue, heart felt conservative protest against Conroys wowserism.  Dont forget to set the recorder   wink

    • Jock says:

      10:48pm | 19/06/10

      I agree but they should have had Max Delong from xtube to play him, thats a run for your inches!

    • Adam Diver says:

      07:49am | 18/06/10

      Cougar town is close to the best show on TV. The premise may be poor, but the show’s quality is definately not.

      On that basis “you should not judge a book by its cover” particularly if you factor in Seinfield which is a show about nothing. Sounds pretty stupid to me

    • BMJ says:

      08:13am | 18/06/10

      Wait wait.

      Cougar town?

      And you’re comparing it to Seinfeld? For Shame.

    • Adam Diver says:

      09:47am | 18/06/10

      I like Seinfield. Just making a point that judging a show on its premise is poor form.

    • PaulB says:

      12:22pm | 18/06/10

      Since when was “Seinfeld’ ever any good?

    • KH says:

      01:04pm | 18/06/10

      Seinfeld was hardly a one joke show.  It’s amazing how much there is in ‘nothing’..............This is a one joke show.  Just like ‘cougar town’, which is another one joke show with a one dimensional lead.

    • Dark Rider says:

      01:13pm | 18/06/10

      Ah, PaulB, a man after my own heart.  Seinfeld would have to be the most unfunny comedy show ever to drag its arse across our screens.

    • These pretzels are making me thirsty says:

      04:44pm | 18/06/10

      @dark rider,$3.7bil in royalties since it went out of production,real stupid

    • jcs says:

      05:32am | 19/06/10

      seinfield at one stage was a show about a show about a show about nothing….

    • Razza says:

      09:28am | 19/06/10

      Since when was “Seinfeld’ ever any good? 
      Are you being facetious Paul B: or just a professional shit-stirrer.
      What the hell are you talking about, what do you like, re-runs of Neighbours or Home and Away.  Seinfeld and Dexter are the only two shows out of the USA Sausage Machine worth watching. Ooops! I forgot Curb Your Enthusiasm.

    • Johor says:

      07:55am | 18/06/10

      It has been showing here in NZ for a while now but the ambiguity of the name
      put me off. A show about the return of capital punishment? Could be appropriate if the lead character is that well endowed!

    • L. says:

      08:05am | 18/06/10

      Can’t see the problem…as long as it’s on in the appropriate time slot, whats the harm? If you don’t like it, don’t watch it. Sounds pretty simple to me. One way or another, the ‘market’ will decide. If the ‘market’ likes it, and it gets good ratings, then that is obvioulsy what ‘we’ want. If it tanks, again, it’s what ‘we’ have decided.

    • CSallen says:

      11:48am | 18/06/10

      totally agreed- freedom of choice withstanding, if you want to watch it, watch it. if you don’t, don’t.
      Shows like True Blood, Gossip Girl and Hung push the boundaries on what would normally be boring run-of-the-mill shows like Neighbours and Rafters. Check out Eastbound and Down- that is some funny stuff.

    • J says:

      01:39pm | 18/06/10

      I agree with L. The viewers will choose one way or the other.  Plus aren’t we over all the home grown shows which are lacking and all the reality shows with 100 spin offs?  I want some good old tv shows back.  If your not into reality or sport…... there is nothing left… a good bokk maybe!

    • Lis says:

      08:28am | 18/06/10

      Seen the first season and it’s a good show. Can imagine how 7 is promoting it but don’t let them, nor the name scare you away.

    • AJ says:

      08:56am | 18/06/10

      I haven’t seen “Hung”, but I loved “Rome” and I’m currently loving “True Blood”. I’ll give any new show from HBO a viewing before I judge it (although I’m not sure the writer of this article did the same).

      And if someone hates the concept of “Hung”, then I’m guessing they’re not going to be a fan of MTV’s “The Hard Times of RJ Berger” which is Hung, but in high school.

    • James says:

      09:07am | 18/06/10

      Gee Matt. Chill out a bit.

      There’s so much rubbish plastered all over the TV these days that I welcome something a little different, even though you don’t agree with it.

      I watched Hung last year. It has a pretty basic plot line and is a little on the slow side at times but it’s a refreshing change from so much of the other dribble that is put in front of us. A guy down on his luck in desperate times doing something a little on the ‘socially unacceptable’ side to make a buck and keep himself afloat.

      My family and friends are forever trapped watching reality shows, programs about pretty spoilt teenagers or one of the many law based shows that seem to run the networks. I like the fact that Hung is a bit earthy, has a back-to-basics appeal to it and that it isn’t full of beautiful people with perfect bodies plastered across it.

      You just sit back and keep enjoying the usual suspects like NCIS, NCIS: Los Angeles, Law & Order, Law & Order:Criminal Intent, Law & Order:SVU, Numb3rs, Medium, Lie to Me, CSI, CSI:Miami, CSI:NY, Glee, Gossip Girl, Cougar Town, Cheerleader Nation etc

      Cheers

    • Matt de Neef says:

      11:47am | 18/06/10

      Hi James. Thanks for your comment. I have absolutely no problem with a show that’s about male prostitution as a means of keeping oneself afloat. Promoting such a show in the way that Seven has, i.e. implying that the show is simply about the size of his penis, is a little more contentious, in my opinion. If the show is as good as everyone seems to think it is, then C7 shouldn’t need to revert to the sort of promotion it has - it would sell itself (pardon the pun).

      Incidentally, of the fifteen shows you mention, I watch only one a semi-regular basis.

    • auserix says:

      01:05am | 20/06/10

      You forgot one of the funniest shows on TV. That would without a doubt be Good News Week on Ten. Another very good show, which unfortunately is being murdered by Nine is Top Gear. They have the hide to call it “supersized” because of all the commercials. Besides it is being re-edited and consists of repeats shown earlier on SBS. They managed to keep it to an one hour show, so why can’t nine?

    • violet says:

      09:08am | 18/06/10

      Have seen most of the first season and unfortunately you don’t get to see the member. Is an ok show, altho not as good as Cougar and Modern Family.

    • Dan Barrett says:

      09:13am | 18/06/10

      What a splendid review from somebody who clearly hasn’t watched the show.

    • PZ says:

      09:13am | 18/06/10

      “Hung” is actually a great show about relationships. It is well-written, humorous and insightful, and has characters of great depth.  It is no more sexually explicit than other HBO shows, like the Sopranos or Sex and the City.  A very clever show.

    • Lex says:

      04:32pm | 18/06/10

      Agreed.  I was hesitant to watch it based on the promos and advertising (but hey, they have to get the ratings up somehow) but on being recommended to give it a go, found it’s actually a show that is more to do with an average joe kind of guy struggling with normal middle age dramas - life didn’t quite turn out the way he planned as a teen, his wife divorced him to marry a richer man and his only real joy are his teenage kids who are troubled themselves.  The show realistically is more around how he is trying to pick himself back up and the ‘gigolo’ concept is there more for the comic relief aspect than the sexually explicit shock value you would think.

    • KL says:

      09:14am | 18/06/10

      Well I hardly think you’re qualified to write this article before seeing even a single episode.

      And please get your facts straight…Hung has been airing on Foxtel since late last year. Great show.

    • Budz says:

      09:18am | 18/06/10

      I get the feeling a lot of times people watch it because there is nothing better on TV. I suggest people put the effort in to start watching better tv shows, whether it be by buying dvds, downloading or what ever so we can force networks to put on some better shows on TV!

    • JS says:

      09:28am | 18/06/10

      I’ve seen the first season of “Hung” and (like most HBO programmes) it’s really great. Funny and clever with good acting and a good script.

      But don’t worry, Matt! I’m sure there will be re-runs of “Packed to the Rafters” you can watch instead… If not, the DVD is probably in the bargain bin.

    • Matt de Neef says:

      11:39am | 18/06/10

      Hi JS. Thanks for your comment. Not that it really matters but I did mention my distate for Packed to the Rafters in the course of the article. Twice.

    • Jenni says:

      09:30am | 18/06/10

      Isn’t it a bit presumptuous to judge a show based on only the promo? Shouldn’t you actually trying and *watch* an episode or two before using it as an example of how quality of television has declined? If you decide not to watch the show because of the promo that’s one thing, but writing an entire article about the low-brow quality of television based on a program you haven’t even seen? IMHO that’s pushing it a little far.

      I could name half a dozen shows of the past couple of years which didn’t ‘grab’ me based on the promos or a write-up, but when I sat down and watched them, proved to be quite entertaining (Archer, Vampire Diaries, Flash Forward, to name just a few).

    • El-vez says:

      09:53am | 18/06/10

      I don’t watch FTA tv much, so I haven’t seen the promos.  I have to say that it’s not actually a bad show.  It’s got a Northern Exposure/Ed type vibe.  The first couple of episodes really don’t do it justice.  At least watch it for the title sequence ftg a great track by the Black Keys.

    • Zeta says:

      09:55am | 18/06/10

      Sorry, all I heard was ‘Thomas Jane + HBO’ and my brain just translated it into win.

      There has never been an Australian television show that could compete on an even footing with anything HBO has ever produced. It’s stupid to even try. You’ve got the best writers, and the best directors and actors lining up to work with them. Seven is actually being really smart. I didn’t know this show was even going to screen in Australia so I was simply going to download it as soon as it aired in the United States - now I might consider watching it on free to air.

    • Kate says:

      11:36pm | 18/06/10

      I have had max respect for Thomas Jane ever since his guest appearance as ‘Homeless Dad’ on Arrested Development. Win.

      Hung has been on Foxtel for the last couple of months. I’ve watched the first five episodes, not bad at all. If you like shows like True Blood, Breaking Bad etc you’ll probably enjoy it.

    • Kordez says:

      10:09am | 18/06/10

      I wonder how it will size up.

    • Jenni says:

      01:28pm | 18/06/10

      *boom tish* nice one smile

    • wots up doc says:

      10:16am | 18/06/10

      Watch Bugs Bunny,bawdy without the dangly bits

    • AdamC says:

      10:33am | 18/06/10

      Matt, I’m all in favour of intellectual snobbery, but television’s just not the medium. If you want to feel better than me because you read novels (that aren’t written by Matthew Reilly) or have actually seen a film directed by John Cassavetes I am prepared to wear it, but high-brow TV? Matt,  you simply have to work harder than that!

    • Matt de Neef says:

      11:36am | 18/06/10

      Hi AdamC, thanks for your comment. To clarify, my intention was never to “feel better” than you; my criticism was directed toward the network rather than television viewers in general.

    • More Bluegrass tv says:

      12:45pm | 18/06/10

      @Adam,along way to before you achieve even the first half of Intellectual Snobbery,my intellectual defences deflected your statement before it did any damage

    • Dan says:

      08:46pm | 18/06/10

      AdamC, that is nonsence. There are numerous amazing TV shows (Frasier, The West Wing and The Wire are just three examples) and plenty of crap novels (Danielle Steel for example). You can’t make such a generalisation about a medium such as TV.

    • Mariella says:

      11:25pm | 18/06/10

      Matt said -

      “my criticism was directed toward the network rather than television viewers in general”

      I hate to be the one to tell you this, but the creators of the tv shows do not have any control over how the shows are “promoted”. The show itself is excellent with superb acting and intelligent witty writing. Like everyone else I saw it last year on Showcase.

      You want to judge it based on a 30 second promo put together by the same nitwit(s) who put together all the “this week on [show] shocking horror terror blah blah” and then you watch the show and it has absolutely nothing to do with shocking horror terror.. that is your bad. You’ll miss out on some excellent television.

      Criticise the network all you want to, but do not judge a show based on that. It would be the same as me judging you based on what some average Joe down the street who has never met you and knows nothing about you has to say about you after reading one of your columns.

      I just thank all the deities that Satisfaction never made it to the commercial channels, I can’t imagine what awful promos they would put together for it. You wouldn’t watch that show either based on the network promos, but you would be missing out on something great. And if you have not seen it, that is your loss.

    • Tangerine says:

      10:53am | 18/06/10

      I’m with you on today’s low standard of television and its common denominator, bottom line approach…and don’t get me started on CH9 and Top Gear touted as “all new”...do they really think we’re that dumb.
      As for this show, I like the male lead as an actor and as such will watch. even though it is on Seven.

    • Nigel Catchlove says:

      11:50am | 18/06/10

      Off topic - but Ch9 has really pissed me off with Top Gear.  I am a bit of a rev-head and I love the show so I nearly alsways watched it on SBS but Ch9 have ruined Top Gear.  Too many advertisements push the show out to an hour and a half and every second week is a repeat of a show that has already screened on SBS.  I like the show but Ch9 has ruined it and I’ll wait for the current series to come out on DVD.

    • 69 gtv 1750 says:

      01:33pm | 18/06/10

      @Nigel,its on line or youtube pretty much after it is presented,vroom,vroom

    • julia says:

      11:26am | 18/06/10

      I love the expression ‘jump the shark’. It’s apt.

    • Tails says:

      12:06am | 19/06/10

      The expression jump the shark has been flogged to death. It probably had some sort of retro cache about 6 years ago, but it’s about as fresh as a Michael Jackson joke.

    • KayU says:

      11:41am | 18/06/10

      I’d take Thomas Jane as my happiness consultant any day!

    • NCG says:

      11:42am | 18/06/10

      Eh, it was on Foxtel late last year and early this year. Wasn’t a bad story line actually, less about the fact the guy is “hung” and more to do with the social implications of a struggling divorced father of two during the GFC. Frankly HBO put out some decent shows as they don’t adhere to the usual expectations of TV programming. Carnivale, Deadwood, The Sopranos, all pretty good shows that buck the usual mind numbing trend.

    • Mark says:

      11:50am | 18/06/10

      Actually - I have watched it and the show is not bad.  A pretty good version of the death of the American dream of middle class comfort and morality… Trouble is, another show does it so much better. “Breaking Bad” is truly a gem of a show.  Taunt scripts, beautiful cinemetography and fantastic acting. 

      TV isn’t at a low point at all - I think in many respects tv is in a golden age right now… The real problem is that it is crap like “Two and a half men”, “NCIS” and “The footy show” that is popular.

    • AFR says:

      12:38pm | 18/06/10

      I agree, TV is the best its been for a while with shows like the Wire (now finished), Breaking Bad and Entourage just to name a few. The problem is that for some reason networks don’t show things for several years, and you have to (illegally) download stuff to see it this decade.

    • exumbrerum says:

      01:11pm | 18/06/10

      Ditto Weeds.

    • LFG says:

      12:12pm | 18/06/10

      Doing ‘reasonably well’ in the US, and there are always enough low-brows to watch low-brow TV in Australia to make it worth putting on. I’m a bit disappointed in 7, though.

    • Jase says:

      12:21pm | 18/06/10

      Has the writer even watched the show?

      It’s been on foxtel for ages and I did watch a few episodes. It wasn’t as bad as most commercial TV and I would certainly be watching that ahead of ridiculous Australian TV like Sea Patrol etc

      While the title may be crass to some viewers you actually feel a lot of empathy for the divorced, average income school teacher just trying to deal with life and two kids.

      Most television shows are crap, but this isn’t one of them.

      Maybe the writer of this article is just jealous?

    • Pete says:

      12:22pm | 18/06/10

      You know Matt, it’s a real shame you wrote this article before watching the show. Sure, it comes across as mere “schoolyard humour”, but the show is well-written, humorous and has great character development. Give it a shot Matt - you may even like it.

      And please, can we stop comparing Hung to that trashy show Cougar Town? They’re on completely different levels.

    • Jamie says:

      12:34pm | 18/06/10

      Firstly, watch the show, then I’ll listen.

      Secondly, a show about male prostitutes. Well, I’ll go out on a limb there and say that it’s a fairly unheard of premise. A man being the object of a paying woman who isn’t Rob Schneider.

      And finally, as for baser instincts being appealed to, well, explain how reality television and the multitude of franchise shows (Law and Order, etc.) do not appeal to a similarly apathetic audience.

    • Rob says:

      12:43pm | 18/06/10

      I saw the first season on Foxtel and I don’t think it will last at the 9.30pm timeslot.  It’s not a feel good show but is quite good nonetheless. Not hanging out for the second season though.

    • Zaf says:

      12:52pm | 18/06/10

      This opens to door to coming show ‘Hooters’ (ex network exec finds herself working as a pole dancer when the network goes bust), leading inevitably to ‘Nostril’, ‘Earlobe’ and ‘Instep’ (ex right-wing politician, I’m looking at you Fiskal, forced to make a living in the fetish community after his preference deals fall through).

      You first read it here.

    • Thank you Beris says:

      12:57pm | 18/06/10

      what’s the difference about a bloke with a big penis and Benny Hill appearing to detach a penis of a statute and use it as a microphone. Nothing. But Benny Hill is not PC anymore.

    • Muttley says:

      01:41pm | 18/06/10

      The primary difference is the Benny Hill bit was a SKETCH. A single bit in amongst 1723 other smutty jokes. But trying to build a TV series around the concept….that is vastly different. Then you can add that Benny Hill finished over twenty years ago. Different time. So i think the difference is pretty apparent.

    • John A Neve says:

      01:06pm | 18/06/10

      I would have thought Joe Hockey was one of the “biggest members” this country has got?
      But as always I stand to be corrected.

    • Bon says:

      01:47pm | 18/06/10

      Knowing channel 7, the show will last a few weeks in the 9:30 time slot then get pushed back to some ridiculous time like 11:00 before dying a natural death.  This is not the first time it has been screened in Australia either - it has already been on foxtel and I didn’t mind it, won’t be watching it on channel 7 though.

    • John says:

      02:01pm | 18/06/10

      This is an old series that has already had a couple of runs on pay TV, and is really pretty tame.
      Does have some pretty good lines

    • Soames says:

      02:33pm | 18/06/10

      “Sex and nudity on TV is all well and good but do we really need a show that revolves around the size of a character’s member?” One should say not. The constituency in which one lives, and the characters within, don’t usually question the size, albeit overweight, thin, short or tall,  of our member. Suffice to say, he has the interests of the community at heart, and one is at a loss to see how his physical dimensions in whichever way,  has a relative effect on his performance. Those comments, of which one has read, by creatures of presumably more base instincts, have no bearing in regard to one’s member, of which one’s local ‘characters’ have no complaints, and consequently, one does not regard those as legitimate concerns.

    • bec says:

      03:25pm | 18/06/10

      We appear to have an every growing need to impose our taste in tv/music/theatre/religion etc on others.  If I don’t find a tv show entertaining, but my friend does, why does one of us have to be wrong?  We are just different.  Unfortunately it seems we need others to like the exact same thing as we do to somehow validate our choices…wonder why?

    • Geoff says:

      03:47pm | 18/06/10

      Already seen it on pay tv. It’s actually pretty funny and works well with Jane in the lead. He’s a talented actor, you’ve only got to watch the movie ‘Stander’ to find out. Some research wouldn’t go astray, how about the author bothering to watch the show first before forming an opinion.

    • Carro says:

      03:48pm | 18/06/10

      A recent OZTAM survey indicated that 38% of Australians wanted to see more Australian TV. Even ahead of sport (36%), American TV (8%) and Reality TV (5%). I have no dramas with imported programs but what annoys me is that our stations make up their Aussie quota with infomercials and deprive audiences of good Aussie content. A new show I have noticed on the horizon is called Terror Australis. Check it out at http://www.local-legends.net

    • John W says:

      03:51pm | 18/06/10

      This must be some new form of journalism with which I’m not familiar - reviewing a TV show without having watched a single episode.

      It’s a shame you don’t plan to tune in and watch the show, Matt de Neef, because if you did you’d realise Channel Seven has, as our commercial networks often do, totally misrepresented the show in its marketing. Hung could easily be as you seem to imagine it will (and probably would be if it were produced by any network other than HBO), but instead it’s a clever look at the realities of what, on the surface, may seem like a relatively simple money-making venture. Imagine you decided to become a gigalo. Try to figure out everything you’d have to do to market yourself, build a client base and maintain a somewhat ordinary relationship with your ex wife, children, neighbours and so on. That’s what Hung is about. In fact, there are only a few sex scenes in the whole first season. For those viewers who are too immature to watch a show with sex or adult concepts, I could suggest How To Make It In America, another outstanding HBO series with a similar concept to Hung, but looking at the fashion industry rather than the sex industry. I warn you, though, HTMIIA has some swearing in it.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      06:44pm | 18/06/10

      It ain’t no MASH, that’s for sure

    • Mickey says:

      09:52am | 19/06/10

      Matt how can you write a review you obviously havent seen the show?
      you slam cougar which is a great show i think your review isnt worth a cracker sorry.
      and of course Seven doesn’t care how good programs are, as long as they are rating well , Ratings = viewers its kinda like voting dont you think?  isnt that just smart business?
      and lastly aussie shows that might or might not be better?
      i think might not… we have a long way to go before producing anything worth watching.
      excellent criticing by the way must save you heaps of time doing it this way

    • Dan says:

      12:36pm | 19/06/10

      De Neef….Please watch a show before you start slagging a programme. What did channel 7 turn you down for a job?

      Having scene the whole first series I can tell you them show is about more than a the stupid promos the network used.

    • Michael says:

      01:49pm | 19/06/10

      You obviously haven’t seen the show. Well done writing an article bases on trailers/ads. It’s a very good show, and while yes there is sex in it, theres not nearly as much as Californication, Rome etc. and it’s actually a refreshingly different take on the whole prostitution role in tv shows.

      What a pathetic attempt to garner some outrage based on nothing. What a pathetic attempt at journalism.

    • Raftered says:

      07:50am | 20/06/10

      I love Packed to the Rafters. Love it.

    • Sal says:

      08:02am | 20/06/10

      I agree that peurile, quasi-porn passing as entertainment is getting old, but I’m wryly amused that this garbage only ‘jumps the shark’ when it involves a man selling his huge shlong to pay the bills. I suspect if it was the usual story of a woman selling herself and flashing her boobies you wouldn’t have batted an eyelid.

    • Oscar says:

      11:09am | 20/06/10

      ive not heard of a show like it, and the reviews (apart from this one, which I didnt take seriously anyway - sorry) are pretty good. it sounds like better tv than the endless rounds of australias not talented factor and “celebrity” crap shows “with the stars” or whatever. ill give anything by HBO a chance and when i do im usually glad i did. at least Hung doesnt have brian mcfadden, kyle sandilands or daniel mcpherson in it. thats gotta count for something.

    • john says:

      11:50am | 20/06/10

      I’ll wait for the improved sequel - “Well hung”

    • Nick says:

      01:20pm | 20/06/10

      Gee Matt, you’re a young guy with taste and standards. How did you ever get hired?

    • soupbones says:

      02:33pm | 20/06/10

      I don’t really care what the do gooders do with the shows that come onto our TV screens. I am over the poor scheduling of TV shows in this country. Its been crap for years, and even with extra digital channels, its still crap.
      Season 2 of Hung starts next week, and I’ll be downloading it and watching it. Season one was great. Nothing like some people have commented ( they probably haven’t even watched it. Sex always sells, so if you think its jumped the shark, then you are very mistaken.

    • Timmo says:

      05:47am | 21/06/10

      I can hear the Elephants and Stallions laughing from here.

    • donna says:

      09:22pm | 09/08/10

      when does season two of hung start???? i like it, its hilarious!!!!

    • kjk says:

      11:57pm | 30/08/11

      Just saw my first episode of Hung - excruciating!!!! Thank god we have free will!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

What about Weet-Bix? “@Slate: How to make pork-infused veggies: http://t.co/ZYOOxVVT

Lucy Kippist

@christoforpaine sorry! Actually thought I already was... Weird?

Lucy Kippist

@dreshubby you wont know until you try!

Malcolm Farr

Carbon tax?RT @danielsutton10: Terrifying number: Hewlett-Packard cutting 27,000 jobs worldwide to save $3 billion. #tennews#tenbreakfast

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Lying on a cold table in an unfamiliar place and undergoing a core biopsy was probably one of the most…

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

Red alert, ladies. Making jokes about your ability at work is not funny particularly at board level.…

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Punishing the baddies is only fun in the movies. In real life it’s messy, expensive, and fraught…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter