LIKE darning socks, car-pooling and drinking instant coffee, bank bashing went out of favour when we were all getting rich during “the great neo-liberal experiment”. Now, from the top office in the land down, this wholesome pursuit is making a comeback.

Cartoonist Eric Lobbecke leads the way

It’s not that the banks ever lost their talent for bastardry. It’s just that for a decade or so it has been suppressed by competition – from the likes of Aussie and Wizard – and by the buoyant economy. That $140 annual account-keeping fee didn’t look so bad when your credit card was in the black and the value of your house had doubled in the past two years. But with competition to the Big Four now all but wiped out, leaving the Westpac, Commonwealth, NAB and ANZ as the last saviours of our financial system (just ask them), the bastards inside can once again be unleashed. 

The Commonwealth took one for the team this week when it raised variable home loan rates 0.1 percentage points to 5.74 per cent. It was the first mortgage rate increase by the banks since last year but won’t, unfortunately, be the last.

There are sound reasons for the Commonwealth’s unpopular move. Firstly, it already had the cheapest mortgages in the market among the Big Four banks. Secondly, the cost of borrowing the funds it needs to resell to customers as home loans is near record levels and getting higher. (It’s complicated but my more-numerate colleagues assure me the bank’s arguments hold water.) And, thirdly, all of the Commonwealth’s competitors, having already trousered about 40 basis points of the Reserve Bank’s rate cuts since September, would dearly love to do the same. They were no doubt deterred by the public evisceration of the first-mover and the explicit threats from Kevin Rudd and Wayne Swan for others to hold their ground. Banks, after all, love nothing more than taking the moral high ground.

What has so infuriated Rudd and Swan is not just that CEO Ralph Norris at the Commonwealth appears to be thumbing his nose at the government, undermining Labor’s efforts to stimulate the economy into recovery and, possibly, forcing the Reserve Bank to cut rates again. It’s the perception that the banks are padding their bottom lines, abusing the very market power the government’s crisis-inspired actions have allowed them to build. What a betrayal of John Q. Taxpayer.

The government can’t be criticised for acting quickly to protect the banks when all hell broke loose in September. You can’t have a functioning and, god willing, recovering economy without a functioning financial system – and Australia’s is now the envy of the Western world. But just about everything the government did in those few crazy weeks late last year consolidated power among the Big Four banks, which are actually looking increasingly like the Big Two (the Commonwealth and Westpac).

The guarantee on customers’ deposits slowed the flight of cash from smaller institutions but not before the Big Four became the preferred home for household savings. Tens of billions of dollars have poured into the Big Four, dramatically reducing their need to tap expensive, overseas debt markets for their funding.

More important was the guarantee on banks’ “wholesale funding”, which effectively allowed the banks to borrow the government’s AAA credit rating, for a fee, to raise money more cheaply in overseas markets. The banks leapt at the chance, raising more than $100bn to strengthen their balance sheets.

Smaller institutions with weaker credit ratings had to pay a higher fee, making it more expensive. Some had to stop giving loans altogether, leaving the Big Four (or Big Two) to skip away from their enfeebled competitors, effectively recreating, then entrenching, the big bank oligopoly. Westpac’s takeover of St George and the Commonwealth’s takeover of BankWest and chunks of Aussie and Wizard hasn’t helped. In the past year, the Big Four’s share of the mortgage market has risen from 58 per cent to 72 per cent. It’s a similar story with deposits.
   
Competition tsar Graeme Samuel, who wishes the BankWest deal hadn’t happened, laments the “comfortable competition” now enjoyed by the big banks. There are still areas where the banks compete, er, fiercely. The chase for deposits, for example, has meant that the interest rates they pay you and me are uncomfortably close to the Reserve Bank rate of 3 per cent. But we’re still talking about a group of banks that rip out $11.6bn in fees from customers each year and, between the Big Four, made an operating profit after tax of $8.9bn - almost $50m a day - in the second half of last year, even as the financial world imploded.

That it was the Commonwealth Bank that moved first to raise rates is doubly disappointing. Even though the government hasn’t had a stake in the bank since the 1990s, Australians still feel a certain level of ownership, expectation and trust towards the institution. It’s the same with Qantas; When Australians are stranded overseas after some natural disaster, we expect the (fully privatised) national flag carrier to bring us home. Now, in our time of economic need, we should be able to turn to the Commonwealth Bank.

In reality, the Commonwealth has no more obligation to help us out than Westpac, Qantas or any other private company with its own shareholders to consider. But if any bank is going to do the right thing, then surely it’s the Commonwealth. (Remember the outrage when stories emerged of the bank’s lack of compassion for victims of the Victorian bushfires. It saw the light after Norris took a phone call from the Treasurer.)

Shareholders - and the Commonwealth has almost 750,000 - want the banks to act like bastards. Millions of customers, and most Australians, expect it. How disappointing. Let the bashing begin.

Most commented

4 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Les in Sydney says:

      01:49pm | 16/06/09

      That’s an interesting assertion in the final paragraph. I’m a shareholder in one of the major banks, Just a smallish holding. I think many of the shareholders - maybe 90% are similar. Between us, we probably hold less than 10% of the shares. The institutional investors - who don’t have to worry too much about fees and interest rates - would make up the majority of shareholdING, but not the majority of shareholders.

      As a small shareholder with a mortgage, let me say I do NOT support the banks sending Aussie jobs overseas so I can get maybe one tenth of a cent per share extra dividend. Nor do I see that tiny extra dividend being in any way a suitable or equitable offset to the increase in my mortgage payments when the rates are hiked.

      As a shareholder, I do not want to see the banks act like bastards. I want them to show some social responsibility. The shareholders get less when the customers go under or go elsewhere.

    • Tye says:

      02:03pm | 16/06/09

      The bank’s play to the big player’s mum’s and dad’s don’t come into it ! they n
      eed to borrow ! WHY ? they brag about million’s sometime’s billions profit

      world new order, here we come !

    • Kevin Phillips says:

      07:07pm | 16/06/09

      Surprise surprise! The banks have manipulated the financial system in Australia to emerge as the dominant providers of finance to the masses and we all just continue to accept the banks shoving the red hot poker in to us where it hurts!

      Banks always have and always will give Australian consumers less service today for more cost than yesterday while the government says a lot and does nothing.

      ASIC and the ACCC do nothing for protecting Australian consumers from banks taking advantage of us because both organizations seem to be manipulated by the banks because they allow the banks to continue raping us financially.

      The Commonwealth bank is giving employees a (tax detuctible) party instead of giving them a pay rise so even bank employees are being given a red hot poker after dutifully following orders from overpaid bank bosses to implement and justify exorbitant costs to bank customers like smiling assassins.

    • kevin phillips says:

      07:17pm | 16/06/09

      Why do banks charge fees (12 billion dollars worth per year) when they are already making a profit from charging more interest on loans that what they pay for the ,money?

      Answer: same reason as why a dog licks their genitals; because it feels good to them.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@nigelmcbain I don't see the nexus between gay marriage and gay sex education in schools. ACL does. Health issues should be taught whatever

Daniel Piotrowski

@jennijenni a few companies are known to do that - ask for story ideas from job applicants so they can steal them later

Malcolm Farr

: Bruce Springsteen: "I get roughed up crowdsurfing… people try to pull chunks out of me" http://t.co/jiHqt8agt9” it was him, @patricklion

Daniel Piotrowski

Ray Hadley fires back at Carlton. Great @candacesutton1 get: http://t.co/7fQzk4Xixh

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter