It might sound a bit odd given that he was reported 15 times - and spent more than a full year of his playing life out of the game - but Barry Hall has probably done more than any other individual over the past 10 years to help expand the national code.

AFL's Sydney success is due in large part to Hall.

If you take your kids along to Auskick in Sydney, or talk to any Swans fans, the one constant which drives their love of the game, the person they associate most readily and passionately with the club, is not Brett Kirk or Leo Barry or Adam Goodes or Paul Roos, but the phenomenal, flawed, big, bad, bustling Barry Hall.
Now that he has quit Aussie Rules, the greatest hits packages will tonight run for several minutes as his contribution to the game is seen first and, sadly, foremost, through his many high-impact brain snaps, such as this textbook left-hook on West Coast’s Brent Staker which cost him seven weeks.

“I can tell you the look on Brett Staker’s eyes is not going to do Barry Hall any good,” Tim Lane said as the Eagles’ eyeballs rolled around inside his skull in a sickening slo-mo. Lane was right, it didn’t, and for many, this image will become the defining moment of Hall’s career, the shorthand story of a man who was nothing other than a hot-head and a hard-man.

It’s simply not true. The mysterious feature of Hall’s aggression is that it was in no way a permanent feature of his game - he could play for months without incident - but sure enough, Bad Barry would eventually flare again, and he’d be rubbed out after another king-hit.

Hall was a physical player, who with his size and strength had a dominant presence on the park, but he was not some park footy psycho who would approach every game with a view to dropping opponents behind the play.

Often his aggression was born out of frustration at two things - being double-teamed or even triple-teamed by defenders, and being ignored by the umpires, who seemed to covertly conclude several years ago that Hall should never get another free, as this recent string of absurd 50m penalties against Hawthorn demonstrated.

Two of the best games Hall ever played involved St Kilda - the first of them was when he still played for them, losing to Adelaide in 1997, where he could have rightly beaten Adelaide’s Andrew McLeod for the Norm Smith best on ground medal, such were his heroics for the Saints. The second was against the Saints for Sydney in the 2005 preliminary final, where aside from kicking four goals, one of them against the run of play in the third term to defuse a St Kilda surge, Hall was also reported for giving what we in the Sydney news media conspired to describe as a “love pat’ to the stomach of St Kilda’s Matt Maguire.

The stakes could not have been any higher for Hall - given his record, he was looking at a two-week suspension, meaning he would miss the Grand Final the following week against West Coast.

The media’s lobbying effort on behalf of Barry - dubbed And Justice For Hall - represented a shift in the Harbour City’s appreciation and understanding of the game. People who had never taken an interest in Aussie Rules before joined the campaign to let Hally play. Even the then Premier Morris Iemma joined the chorus. When he was cleared by the tribunal The Tele’s front page pictured Hall with a smile from ear to ear, as he brushed politely past the media pack, and read: I’d love to talk folks but…I’M OFF TO THE GRAND FINAL.” Sydney’s victory the following week gave the club, in its Sydney incarnation, its first bit of silverware. To the AFL, it represented what Andrew Demetriou had called “the jewel in the crown” for the national game - a premiership-winning club in every AFL state.
     
One year later, Hall’s poor performance in the 2006 Grand Final - and his subsequent rage at the media after he vanished for a couple of weeks and reporters rightly tried to track him down - may have been the first sign he was losing his passion for the game. At a post-match club dinner at the Melbourne Exhibition Centre on the Saturday Night, the players were all gutted, having lost by less than a kick to their West Coast nemesis, but Brett Kirk spoke passionately urging them to hold their heads high. And all of them did, except for Barry Hall, who stood with his head bowed, staring at his feet, obviously so utterly ashamed of his own efforts that he did not want to face the club’s most rusted-on fans.

That episode shed a bit of light on a guy who has obviously struggled to be at some kind of peace with himself, perhaps because he expects too much, and is unable to deal with his own frustration when he doesn’t perform well.

Indeed all his brain-snaps have generally come at a time when the run of play is against him or the club, when the umpires have been giving him a raw deal, and when despite several months of peace, Bad Barry will suddenly re-emerge and someone will wind up having a bit of an extended lie-down.

But for these momenets, footy is still the richer for his contribution, the Swans are more popular than they would otherwise have been, and the AFL is more entrenched as a code in Sydney than it was 10 years ago. Our thoughts now should probably be with the first mug boxer who comes up against him at his debut fight.

22 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • ANDIKA says:

      04:04pm | 07/07/09

      It’s sad that the ENFORCERS of the NRL and AFL are going the way of the dodo. Football is a full contact sport yet it’s getting softer each year.
      I also think it was pretty low of his coach to basically publically hang him.

    • barry dingle says:

      04:10pm | 07/07/09

      Tony Rocca retires and heads to the US. The pies pick up Hall on a one-year ‘play and pay’ contract. hmmm… let the conspiracy stuff roll.

    • Damo says:

      04:19pm | 07/07/09

      ANDIKA, I think there is a difference between being soft and punishing someone who outright decks an opponent or knocks them unconscious.
      In Roos defence, would you want to pay a player who missed the equivalent of an entire season due to such unsportsmanlike actions?

    • valamas says:

      04:25pm | 07/07/09

      I like the big hits, but throwing fists is a weak attempt at putting the opposition off their game. Or it is a poor disipline in playing the game as it should be.

      Some argue that not being able to fight is taking something away from the game. So wrong.

      I happened to catch an early 1980’s grandfinal game for ARL (NRL) , and was amazed that on every tackle, the opposition player would pinch the back of the neck of the other player. Glad that obviously has been stopped.

      I am a huge swans supporter and every hit that Barry has made has taken something away from the game. He was a hero of mine, and I was ashamed for him. Now im glad he is not playing on my team anymore.

    • Sam says:

      04:34pm | 07/07/09

      It saddens me that the writer tries to justify Hall’s thuggery by saying he was frustrated.  Plenty of people get tagged heavily by the opposition but don’t resort to using their fists.
      Don’t make this man a hero - he was a thug and should have been kicked out of the game years ago.
      What is it about Sydneysiders that makes thuggery attractive to them?  By the writer’s own admission, Hall’s actions made more of them interested in the game.  Does this interest in mindless thumping of the opposition explain their obsession with rugby perhaps?

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      04:37pm | 07/07/09

      I am very disappointed about Barry’s departure. I don’t like Paul Roos much either for his comments after Barry’s last game. I wonder whether anyone really took any notice of the sneaky elbow to Barry’s face prior to his retaliation with the punch. Barry should never have been placed in a position where he is not allowed to defend himself when rival players, knowing full well he is on close watch for any misdemeanours, provoke him or try to whenever they think they can get away with it. That tactic was never going to work and I cannot imagine any man allowing other men to thump them and just “turn the other cheek”.  Today we hear about an NRL player’s misdemeanours that make Barry’s pale by comparison and yet all that player gets is suspension and the club a fine. Not good enough Roos!

    • Wassim says:

      04:40pm | 07/07/09

      Barry Hall? Are you serious? He may be an alright player, but his conduct is not fit for display on television unless he wants to join a wrestling organisation. Aussie rules is full-contact, yes, within the rules. What is it with this country’s facination with bad boys. Ned Kelly to Barry Hall, is it any wonder so many teenagers end up in comas every weekend. Somehow, they’re not getting the message that violence is not good for them. That’s right, the aggressor is also a victim of violence in society… because someone who uses their fists to solve problems is gonna be stumped when he’s faced with a Global Financial Crisis or how to afford your first home. At least he won’t even be offered a job in the media post retirement. While we have a laugh watching Barry crack another one, some young bloke is learning that this is how you assert your manhood in modern day Australia. Well it might work in the pub or on the sporting field, but when you carry that mentality into family life you’ve got buckly’s chance of working through issues with your wife and kids and employers and that prick on the tram who accidentally stepped on your shoes. Come on Australia. We are the victims of our own shortcomings.

    • dave says:

      05:16pm | 07/07/09

      Barry brought this on himself. Every man and his dog knows how to provoke him and get him off his game. What Barry gets is nothing compared to what guys like Judd, Cousins, Kerr , Ablett and many others get every week. Only Hall and Kerr consistently reacted the wrong way to it. As for Roos, I thought his comments were meant to challenge Hall to lift his game, not bury him. I dont understand why Barry hasnt stayed to let the Swans trade him though. I honestly doubt we’ll see him on an AFL field as a player again, which is a shame for any footy lover.

    • Numble says:

      05:15pm | 07/07/09

      What is it with people? Ben Cousins repeatedly screws himself and his club, who gave him a billion chances to get it right, yet he is still lionised. This article smacks of the same thing for Barry Hall. These idiots break the rules, get many more chances than you and me would and yet we still get idiots like the author of this article praising them.

      He didn’t play hard, he threw punches in a football game. Repeatedly. Playing hard is tackling and bumping and putting YOUR body on the line. Punching people while you (idiotically) think no one’s watching (on national TV) is not good footy, it’s not hard playing, it’s boxing.

      Thank heavens this wanker can go off and do what he obviously wants to do.

    • Mark Amdur says:

      05:19pm | 07/07/09

      Barry Hall? I don’t even want to be in the same suburb with him.  What an indictment of “Australian Culture” that we applaud his behaviour.  We should all be ashamed of him, even more so the Media should be ashamed for making him a ‘hero’.

    • Dennis says:

      05:25pm | 07/07/09

      I wonder how some people go to a match and bay for blood, and then get all self-righteous in the media afterwards. Just like we expect our soldiers to go out and kill and then can’t quite switch off fast enough when they are outside the zone.
      A few good men’s lessons remain unlearned.
      Fantastic tribute: Most real geniuses are flawed. (Eric Cantona anyone?)

    • Dave says:

      05:26pm | 07/07/09

      Barry Hall was nowhere near beating Adelaide’s Andrew McLeod for the Norm Smith best on ground medal in 1997.

    • Uncle Davo says:

      06:27pm | 07/07/09

      Good bye Barry Hall. True champions like Andrew Mc Leod and Ben Cousins don’t throw punches, they play football.

    • had enough says:

      07:44pm | 07/07/09

      he should never have been allowed to play in the ‘05 final. the only reason he got off was that the tribunal had old south melbourne supporters on it or at least enough people that were desperate for a victorian win (despite south melbourne no longer existing) that they would clutch at any straw…even if that meant setting one standard for this thug and another for fraser gherig two weeks earlier.

    • Anthony says:

      07:46pm | 07/07/09

      Now that he has quit Aussie Rules?? David, did you even watch his media conference or was this just a pre-prepared piece you had ready to go?

    • Dana says:

      09:01pm | 07/07/09

      Hall is simply a dirty player and a bad sportsman….I agree with Sam it is ridiculous that this writer is trying to justify, or rather glorify, Halls conduct.

    • Marcus says:

      10:37pm | 07/07/09

      Over the past 3 years Hall recently demonstrated the worst kind of full-forward. One who didn’t have the stamina or pace to lead and mark, or even contest, he constantly reverted to pushing the full-back in the back and taking a mark. After the umpires became aware of this he basically reverted to being a coward, hitting the opposition who were not even looking at him at the time. The only other place I have seen this happen is in L-grade Football in WA. I hope he goes into boxing and has to look his opponent in the eye before throwing a punch - Big Bad Gut-less Wonder.

    • Paolo says:

      02:09am | 08/07/09

      Are you kidding Mr Penberthy? ...Expand the national code? ...  Hall has done nothing but damage the reputation of our national sport, promote violence in other levels of the game and make parents think twice about letting their boys play the sport.  Suggesting that Barry Hall deserves praise only reinforces the damage this man has done!

    • Val says:

      02:15am | 08/07/09

      How can you blame Roos ?  ... He gave boofhead Barry so many chances ... to many in fact ... It’s a contact game but how Hall didn’t get assault charges against him I just don’t know!

    • Anthony says:

      01:24pm | 08/07/09

      “expand the national code”...  In to what?  Boxing?

    • Peter Warrington says:

      02:29pm | 09/07/09

      I tell you one thing I won’t miss, Roos drawling “Hally” over and over. has to be the worst nickname of a high profile star ever?

    • norma says:

      01:43pm | 28/08/09

      Let’s face it - you either love him or hate him.  Barry I love you - I miss you, I miss the excitement and edge you bring to a game - just you running out onto the field gives presence in itself.  I hope you go to the Western Bulldogs.  But I agree with Peter Warrington, what is it with AFL football that it has to be “Roosy” and “Hally” and “Crouchy” - it’s like they are still three year olds in a sandpit.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

What about Weet-Bix? “@Slate: How to make pork-infused veggies: http://t.co/ZYOOxVVT

Lucy Kippist

@christoforpaine sorry! Actually thought I already was... Weird?

Lucy Kippist

@dreshubby you wont know until you try!

Malcolm Farr

Carbon tax?RT @danielsutton10: Terrifying number: Hewlett-Packard cutting 27,000 jobs worldwide to save $3 billion. #tennews#tenbreakfast

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Lying on a cold table in an unfamiliar place and undergoing a core biopsy was probably one of the most…

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

Red alert, ladies. Making jokes about your ability at work is not funny particularly at board level.…

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Punishing the baddies is only fun in the movies. In real life it’s messy, expensive, and fraught…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter