Dylan fans will be familiar with the stream of consciousness liner notes on the back sleeve of Highway 61 Revisited where the Zimmer-man writes of Savage Rose and Fixable and the Cream Judge and the Clown, of Lifelessness saving the world, of the Phony Philosophers and the Beautiful Strangers.

I was compelled to re-read this unusual piece of writing this week after subbing an opinion piece written by Barnaby Joyce and have decided that if Dylan has a literary heir in this country it is the newly-installed shadow minister for finance.

Joyce has now written seven opinion pieces for our website The Punch and the marvellous thing about all of them is that you could buy a pack of Gitanes, slip into your skivvy and beret, and recite random passages aloud in a Soho coffee shop with Miles Davis’ Kind of Blue playing in the background, and the critics would hail you as the greatest beat poet since Ginsberg.

A few stanzas from the Joyce canon:

“I am watching a television with some people dressed up as dogs on it/and as there will be a tax on electricity, the price of that will go up/the lady working in the coffee shop is washing the dishes in a dishwasher so the price of that has just gone up/she is wearing a pressed new apron, lately washed, and the cost of washing that has just gone up/on the menu is lambs fry, and ovine ruminant potentially has a huge tax on it/ I could go for the vegetable stack and that requires fertiliser to grow.”

Or this:

“Is philosophy now no more than a bib handed out to be worn before the political chamber game, a contrived or acquired vocal tribalism?”

Or this:

“Some television commentators think that I’m the insane one/Maybe that explains the place where I work/Obviously, if I’m not me, who am I?”

Apologies to any Baby Boomer readers for any acid flashbacks they have just experienced.

The elevation of this agrarian existentialist to such a senior position on the frontbench has been greeted largely with sniggers on the Left of politics. Coupled with the return of Philip Ruddock, Bronwyn Bishop and Kevin Andrews, Tony Abbott has been accused of giving life to the excellent maxim that when you’ve got nothing, you’ve got nothing to lose.

The benefits of reinstating Howard-era ministers are worth debating. But the promotion of Joyce is undoubtedly the smartest thing Abbott has done in assembling his first shadow ministry. For his occasional incomprehensibility, Joyce is one of the most effective politicians in Australia right now. Like a couple of other notable Queenslanders before him in Sir Joh and Porr-lean, he thinks, talks and acts like an anti-politician, a straight-shooter who conveys his message in a cavalier and unpretentious style. But he has none of Bjelke-Petersen’s crookedness and none of Hanson’s ignorance. He is decent and smart. And he has done the best job of any regional politician, probably any politician, in harnessing public disquiet over the ETS.

It’s here where Labor could have a serious problem on its hands with Joyce. In a very prescient piece for our website this week, published under the pithy headline Left Should Beware Abbott’s War on Wankers, left-wing political strategist and EMC director Peter Lewis warned his comrades that the Abbott Liberals could very easily revisit the republic-wrecking strategies from the 1999 referendum to smash Rudd over the ETS.

You can write the arguments on the back of a beer coaster in handy front-bar language so that every undecided punter in the land will have them burned on their brain – it’s going to cost a lot of money, no-one has explained how it will work, it’s hard to see why we need to do it anyway, and I’m buggered if I’m going to be lectured by a bunch of uni types about it.

Lewis wrote:

“My growing concern is that a similar dynamic is at play with the climate change debate, now crystalised into a meaningless acronym, the ETS. Take this exchange with a Labor-voting cabbie last week:

“Bloody Rudd and his ETS – all he’s going to do is increase power prices; the poor pensioners won’t be able to afford it. And who says we need to pay more? Bloody scientists, that’s who. What would they know – all they’ve ever done is gone to uni.”

“These sentiments show the fertile ground an Abbott scare campaign on the ETS has to work with: not just the personal cost embodied in the mantra ‘a new tax’; but the backlash against people from uni telling us what to do.”

“While Kevin Rudd and Penny Wong refer to the expert advice; Abbott will not engage on the science – he will go after the scientific community as ideologically driven tossers working in league with the phoneys from Canberra.”

Some will regard these tactics Lewis identifies as ugly and uninformed, pandering to the worst in our national makeup. Others would counter that it’s the job of opposition to reflect and respond to sizeable public concern over such a major policy issue. Either way, this don’t-lecture-me-smart-guy tactic has been proven to be politically devastating in the past. And there is no reason why it cannot work again, especially when, in Joyce, Abbott has picked the right man to help direct the debate in that direction.
Joyce has had three different press secretaries working for him in the past 12 months but his opinion pieces and press releases have maintained the same tone throughout. Either he employs good mimics or he writes them all himself; I suspect it is the latter.

When you have Kevin Rudd talking in riddles about programmic specifity, or other Labor frontbenchers wheeling out drumroll-please lines in Question Time that have clearly been penned for them by the comically challenged, Barnaby’s beat poetry will find a receptive audience both in the media and in the public.
He was off to a flier this week. Within minutes of his promotion Joyce issued a press release under the strangely menacing all-caps headline HELLO WAYNE. It had a nice stalkerish tone to it, like he’s going to channel De Niro as Max Cady in Cape Fear and lash himself to the bottom of the Treasurer’s Comcar.

“I must admit that after the appointment to Shadow Finance Minister my comic relief came from Treasurer Swan’s media release stating that I must follow Labor’s strict rules on fiscal discipline. It’s like Captain Calamity’s instructions on yoga. There’s one thing that is absolutely certain, I will not be taking any lead, whatsoever, from a crowd who have taken us from having tens of billions of dollars in the bank, to debt up to our eyeballs, with more dogs tied up around town than Bernie Madoff. Labor has gone on a spending bender and is now waiting for the fairy godmother to come and rub the red ink from the books.”

I have no idea who Captain Calamity is or what his instructions are for yoga but in this age of saccharine political stage management, in a country blessed with a beautiful vernacular, Joyce may achieve what the strategists call cut-through, even when you’ve got no literal sense of what the guy is actually saying. 

60 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Martin says:

      01:24pm | 15/12/09

      Here’s a test for Eric, Wayne Hutchins and other denialists - see if you can actually describe the way our climate system works, understand the concepts of radiative balance, radiative forcing, ocean-atmosphere coupling, non-linear systems and positive feedback loops. If you can’t give accurate descriptions of these concepts you have no chance of understanding the science behind global warming, no chance of comparing one set of evidence against another - nor of assessing the relative credibility of IPCC reports versus the flawed works of out-of-their depth hacks like Ian Plimer. Climate science is substantial, has been worked on by intelligent people for many decades and has been tested and strengthened by equally smart people. Ignorant amateurs are entitled to their ill-informed opinions but if you actually wish to have something worthwhile to say then do some real, hard reading and thinking - not just a few of your superficial Google searches. Try reading the IPCC reports - and compare them to the error-riddled rubbish of Plimer. Try thinking about the complexity of the systems, and actually try to understand the way all these systems interact. Humanity is conducting a gigantic and risky experiment in which it is forcing the climate system at an unprecedented rate and in unprecedented ways. And no, these circumstances have never before existed on the earth. We have had periods when CO2 densities were higher, but this is does not contradict my statement about the rate of forcing.

    • John A Neve says:

      10:33am | 15/12/09

      Wayne Hutchins @ 0652hrs.

      I “can’t do it”, I can’t do what Wayne?
      No claims have I made, unlike you and your mate Eric.  No name calling again like you and your mate.

      Your trouble Wayne, is that you are a follower not a thinker, I know, it hurts you head, no matter take a Aspro.

      Contact Eric for me and help him with the answers to my questions. They say two heads are better than one, or so they say.

    • Sylvia says:

      09:59am | 15/12/09

      Knock knock knockin, on his empty head.

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      05:52am | 15/12/09

      There you go John A Neve, you can’t do it can you. Where is your proof? You say one or two emails! What a clown you are. WE DO THINK FOR OURSELVES! DO YOU?

    • Joel B1 says:

      11:56am | 14/12/09

      “the environment is degrading, just look around”

      What do the cognitive psychs call that error?

      Is it the “availability heuristic”? or is it the “auto-imposition heuristic”? or is it “you’re just plain wrong”?

    • John A Neve says:

      10:17am | 14/12/09

      Eric,
      You and Wayne have proved nothing. You have taken one or two e-mails against a mass of documentation and suggested the whole climate change issue is a Furphy!!!

      Your don’t need any one to tell you that the environment is degrading, just look around. Lstening to you and Wayne reminds me of Big Brother and the chocolate ration issue. You two would believe anything, try thinking for yourselves.

      Don’t try to hard to answer my questions Eric, it might stress you.

    • James says:

      08:54am | 14/12/09

      Hey formersnag, try googling (or whatever other search engine you please) the words 9/11 truth, and you will find all sorts of links to websites, news stories and tv documentaries.
      Then you can thank me, for helping protect you from your own stupidity…

    • James says:

      08:47am | 14/12/09

      Jim, t o continue with the Dylan analogy, if the Libs keep on like they are, they won’t have the Subterranean Homesick Blues - it will be far worse than that.  I would say they will have the Tombstone Blues, especially if one were to judge by the zombies on the front bench at the moment.

    • Old Clive says:

      08:41am | 14/12/09

      Old Clive says that a lot of youse blokes has got a lot of livin to do, a lot of us old blokes has seen you young blokes come and go, going to uni against the school of hard knocks , uni in the main is bullshit in and bullshit out, the hard knocks is the one that has experience and living through joy and pain behind it. Some you young’uns have had it that good that you don’t know what pain and hardship is, but the shit that is flowing out of this government and Krudds mouth will be givin youse blokes a lesson in hardship that we older blokes has been through. Boy has I learnt how to express my knowledge in perfect English.

    • Dino says:

      08:14am | 14/12/09

      Now, Dylan’s lyrics did get strange from time to time, but that clip is from Weird Al Yankovic “Bob”. I’ll be very impressed with Barnaby Joyce if he can give an entire press conference or media interview speaking only in palindromes.

    • Phil says:

      07:25am | 14/12/09

      DWEST

      Going after the lefties, I dont think so, but its unlikely many who write here with anti Abbott/Joyce points and probably also work for Mark Arbib are going to vote for anyone other than labor.

      As for the swinging voters, dont give up yet. Workchoices and a dishonest campaign by the Unions cost John Howards, this and the fact many Australians think after a time that a change is necessary. Many are dissatifyied with labors debt levels, 1 boat or more a week arriving illegally, and the soft border protection policies. These same voters, acknowledge that some cash into the economy was required, but if we are doing as well as the reserve bank says, then it should be cut back. They are also pissed at the insulation rort, claimed by many who were just two lazy to get the job done before hand. Everyone I know could have afforded it without it being free is they wanted.

      Many of thel lefties/labor voters harp on about climate change, yet if no compensation was payable/given, which many of you would be entitled to under the proposed scheme, I say most would change their tune, particularly with the poorly set up proposal being put forward which has minimal reduction in CO2 levels.

      Hand up all the climate change agreers who would want a fair dinkum system with real reductions, say 35-45% , if it cost you all say $ 2-4,000 per year per family/household? Thought so. The agreement would go straight out the window if it actually cost you guys money and you had to make sarcifices or work more hours to pay it.

      As for a lack of policies, with the exception of the Open Door policy on illegals, and the wastful cash splash and debt, Kevin Rudd copied most of the coalitions previous policies. Tony Abbott’s new blood has been in for less than 1 week, give him a chance to either rework redo them then be afraid, be very afraid. Most of Tony’s shadow cabinet have actually held down real jobs in private section, even owned businesses rather than being public servants and union officials.

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      07:12am | 14/12/09

      Eric has to explain nothing to you john A Neve! You need to prove to us that Carbon is the cause for climate change. Still haven’t managed to pull it off have they? Your supposed evidence for it gets torn apart daily. (Shakes head with disgust at the brain dead people that inhabit this planet)

    • alteria says:

      07:22pm | 13/12/09

      Dingo-aus - Barnaby went to Riverview huh? Gee, that changes my opinion. Of you, for being so shallow as to think what school a politician went to makes any difference.
      Charles - have a rest mate. ‘Climate-gate’ raises questions about only two or so of the hundreds of scientists who have contributed research to modern understanding of climate change, most of whom have no connection to the university mainly concerned. To suggest that makes the whole deal suspect makes YOU suspect. It’s not the ‘smoking gun’ the sceptics’ hysteria would have us believe.

    • Steven says:

      04:48pm | 13/12/09

      “Either he employs good mimics or he writes them all himself; I suspect it is the latter.”

      Or he has that mystery advisor we all keep hearing about.

    • Rohan says:

      04:45pm | 13/12/09

      I don’t know about Eric but as someone who actually has a medical degree I find the comparing of the science and ‘practice’ of Medicine to the current science surrounding Climate Change offensive and stupid.

    • Simon Harris says:

      04:42pm | 13/12/09

      The most lethal operator Canberra has seen since Keating. And they still underestimate him. Its a mystery that they do because every time he takes on a political challenge…he wins.

    • Al says:

      04:34pm | 13/12/09

      I am not sure people actually know the ‘real’ Barnaby Joyce. He was a private Sydney schoolboy who was schooled at Riverview in Sydney and worked for multinational finance companies before setting up an accountancy practice in regional Queensland. He has a level of economic experience that very few in the parliament realise. People may think they no everything about this man, but they don’t.

    • formersnag says:

      03:54pm | 13/12/09

      climate loonies take note, google, bing or yahoo “GD, Global Dimming, the Shade Cloth effect”, its all there links, TV docos, etc.

      Then say thank you Eric, for trying to protect me from my own stupidity.

    • Eric says:

      02:59pm | 13/12/09

      Steve and Hoofman, of course you know that I am referring to one specific example of scientific fraud, called Climategate.

      Your attempts to create a strawman are easily seen and dismissed.

      Perhaps you should contemplate the reasons why you need to resort to such dishonest tactics in order to defend your beliefs. Maybe it’s because those beliefs are false?

    • Eric says:

      02:24pm | 13/12/09

      Have you seen the Climategate material. John?

      I hope not—because only a very dishonest person would pretend to ignore what it demonstrates.

      The Internet is here, it’s very open, and you can look up Climategate for yourself. What is your excuse for being so ignorant?

    • Michael says:

      02:02pm | 13/12/09

      Has anyone seriously considered what the role of Finance Minister, and therefore his shadow is? Oversight and pruning rights over every other portfolio in the government, and for his shadow, its alternative. How many noses can one man put out of Joyce… ah, joint? The Liberals and Nationals will be tearing at each others’ entrails well before the next election. Policies have price tags attached, and a bush accountant brings a very narrow history to understanding the big picture of national interest financial management. You ‘read’ a leader by who he appoints to his team. Abbott has displayed a ‘bully in the playground and his sycophants’ approach to the setting up of his alternative Cabinet. And that is most definitely not the sort of thinking I would want to see running this country.

    • John A Neve says:

      01:41pm | 13/12/09

      Charles @ 1054hrs.

      Have you seen all these e-mails Charles?

      Have you seen all the other documentations supporting climate change?

      If the answer to one or both these questions is NO, I suggest you take a Bex and have a good lie down.  You might tax your brain.

      I am stll waiting for Eric to give me a logical explanation for his rants, but I doubt I’ll ever get one.

    • Steve says:

      11:51am | 13/12/09

      Eric says “Going after the scientific community as ideologically driven tossers is pretty easy when that’s what they actually are”. Right, so from now on Eric obviously won’t be going to a hospital to have his broken jaw fixed. What those doctors with all their medical science know? He won’t drive over a bridge cos it might fall down. What would those stupid science engineers know? He won’t take his sick dog to the vet. What would they know? He won’t be driving his car any more. Those tossers with their fancy science designing and building cars…Good on you Eric. Have a nice life as Robinson Crusoe.

    • Moochie Norris says:

      10:18am | 13/12/09

      “He thinks, talks and acts like an anti-politician, a straight-shooter who conveys his message in a cavalier and unpretentious style.”

      You just described an Australian “W”.

      Funny that this sort of praise is heaped on Barnaby Joyce—aren’t the coalition always getting stuck into the ALP for being all style over substance?

    • charles says:

      09:54am | 13/12/09

      John A Neve and Daz, which part of fraud don’t you understand apart from all of it.

      The documents that Eric has directed you to features scientists discussing how they are going to:

      fudge the data
      manipulate the data
      massage the data
      hide the data
      corrupt the peer review process
      bully scientific journal editors,
      etc.

      Just so that their view or theory of climate change is the one that prevails.

      They are doing this for:

      money
      power
      acknowledgment
      recognition
      more money
      and celebrity status
      even more money,
      etc,

      Now, given that this is the group of people in charge of interpreting and advising governments on how to respond to the weather, and given the amount of vested interest at play, isn’t it significant that what these e-mails and data runs show is how it was all concocted so that people like yourself get to give up lots of your money to satisfy the agenda of some very undeserving interests.

      In fact, Eric is doing you favour to try and prevent yourselves from looking like turkeys voting for Christmas, because that is the level of your naivety and gullibility

    • Lenny J says:

      08:43am | 13/12/09

      Just remember, politics may well be what we sniggeringly call ‘showbiz for ugly people’, but let’s not forget what the pollies are supposed to be doing for us. Their job is not to entertain the press gallery, whose job is not to entertain the public (LOL). 

      Abbott is clearly desperate to cut through and he knows this is his one shot at personal glory. Joyce is indeed a polarising populist nutter who actually belives that he has to bear no real responsibility for anything at all that he says or does except keeping his own seat. So far he is doing better than Hanson did because she basically was just not bright enough.
      They are indeed good copy for the journalists and cartoonists but just remember global warming and the survival of a liveable biosphere, remember those? If you want entertainment go watch a movie or a sitcom. Don’t waste taxpaper dollars poncing around like silly nitwits in a comedy series.

    • Dingo_aus says:

      08:14am | 13/12/09

      You do realise Barnaby went to Riverview in Sydney and is a qualified accountant who has actually practised in the private sector, right? - it isn’t as if he lived his whole life under a rock.

      How many private sector jobs has Wayne Swan ever had? - ZERO.
      What accountancy experience or qualifications can Wayne Swan claim to have - ZERO.

    • Eric says:

      08:09am | 13/12/09

      John, google Climategate if you really want to know.

      I don’t think you do - you’re just trying to waste my time. If you don’t understand the issue, that is your fault for not bothering to learn about it.

    • hoofman says:

      07:22am | 13/12/09

      Eric, I assume that if you ever fall ill or are seriously injured, you will not seek hospital treatment due to your belief that ‘the scientific community are ideologically driven tossers’. The scientific community developed modern medicine and eschews such beliefs as faith healing on ideological grounds. Good luck with your life, non-reliant on the products of the scientific community, Eric. No women either. Sounds a bit bleak, mate.

    • chris says:

      07:15am | 13/12/09

      Penbo you don’t need a Weatherman to see that Barnaby is more of a danger to the Libs than to Labor.

    • Rohan says:

      10:08pm | 12/12/09

      The poetry is that Barnaby actually makes Abbott look like a tough leader. And on the other side he brings ‘working families’ with him.

    • John A Neve says:

      06:20pm | 12/12/09

      Eric @ 1256hrs.

      Your links indicate nothing other than diverse opinion.

      So please address my questions, if you can?

    • Daz says:

      06:17pm | 12/12/09

      @Eric You slag out all scientists on a piece of technology built by science (computer?), but rely on *some* scientists to mount an argument for Climategate. Confused? Can you be clearer about which scientists are the ‘good’ ones? Or which ones your flawed ideology wants us to believe? ( Ericgate!)  And, when I find a group of (ex?) priests that disagree with the Vatican and post obsessive-compulsive links about how Abbott’s beliefs have been dictated to by a dubious, profiteering Vatican belief system -  will you support Abbott-gate?

    • mcdazz says:

      06:09pm | 12/12/09

      @ thatmosis 03:14pm | 12/12/09:

      “Its an unfortunate thing that the real brain dead cant see past the plastic face of our fearless leader and see what he is trying to do to Australia and every man woman and child therein.”

      Actually, most of us can - but we’re just not prepared to replace the “plastic face” with a total and complete hypocrite that goes by the name of Barnaby Joyce.

      Barnaby Joyce is a real danger alright - but only to those who can’t see through his smug, narrow minded brain.

    • Grog says:

      05:16pm | 12/12/09

      The good thing about Barnaby’s cut through style is that it makes it easy for all to see what a complete fool he is, and what an absolute disaster for the economy it would be if he were ever Finance Minister. Keep talking Barnaby, you’re just tightening the noose round your and Abbott’s necks.

    • DWest says:

      04:43pm | 12/12/09

      @phil call many of them lefties in ignorance or laziness, but ignore the serious sector of swinging voters at your peril. As Abbott may well do - with his smash through his own agenda style.  Howard 2.0. Blaming others ,including lefties, swingers or anyone else for a lack of clear, understandable policy is immature and self sabotage at best (especially during a honeymoon period) - as Sophie did yesterday.

    • Pauo Montgomery says:

      04:16pm | 12/12/09

      How many voters remember who Bob Dylan is? Many of them can’t even recall Dylan from 90210. You’re dating yourself with these cultural references, Penbo. Who next, Sylvia Plath?

      Painting Joyce as the next Palin is a bit rich. Above all other problems with that analogy, it insults the intelligence of the electorate. Yes, some of them fell for Hanson, but Joyce won’t look nearly as svelte draped in a flag. I think Australians in general are sick of the Howard era with its dog whistle rhetoric and constant wedge tactics. Joyce may try to be Pauline Lite but you can’t be half-pregnant.

      Given that the average IQ is 100 by default, trying to drive a global warming wedge between those of sub-70 IQ and the rest is not a sound electoral strategy.

    • Emily's Nephew says:

      03:03pm | 12/12/09

      If Barnaby’s anti anyone who knows anything line takes hold how will the opposition develop its policies?  After all, sin’t economics a brand of science; and what about the people who make the computers many accountants use - yep scientists.

      And don’t many in the bush think the CSIRO should be better funded?

      If BJ believes what he says - that’s a worry; and if he doesn’t that makes him into a potential demagogue.  Just like many of the others in TA’s ‘team’.

      And where’s Joe Hockey?  Has he been muzzled?

    • Phil says:

      02:23pm | 12/12/09

      The funny thing is Barnaby is not trying to look good to the Persephone’s Chong’s or Drew’s of this world. You guys are so left wing rusted on labor voters, even ,possibbly green that he knows he has no hope of every extracting a vote from you lot, nor does he wish to appeal to you anyway.

      As I have stated before, you lot would swallow shit if Labor told you it was world saving chocolate.

      Barnaby is an intelligent man, albeit often from left field with some comments. Can you imagine KRUDD’s blood pressure when he read Wayne’s press release then saw Barnaby’s response.

      Barnaby will take it to you lefties in a big way. His comments, whilst alarming, about state and world economies might actually make people think, which is exactly what Labor dont want you to do, after all they know all. China will one day be the world’s biggest economy and own most of America.

      For those labor voters who harp on about our debt of 115.7 billion being low, that is just like saying as a council worker on 60K per year, my $ 2M mortgage on a point piper home is lower than many others, even if I have no idea how or when im going to attempt to repay it.

      Rudd is scared to debate ETS, because he cant predetermine his answers to unknown questions. But if Abbott has a policy the spin doctors within Labor, can work some prescripted questions to try and give Abbott a few to the chin.

      The LNP may not win the next election, but from an unlosable one, Kevin will be more concerned now taking on Abbott who is making waves, and getting traction than he was taking on John Howard with the entire media behind him.

      Maybe they could bring in an ETS which was opt ional to join. I bet London to a brick most Labor Voters without any compensation, which many look like being entitled to not vote for and want the system. As usual with Labor its do as I say not as I do.

      By the way I can afford to pay my share, its just that the crummy system proposed will have such a negligable impact id rather not.

    • thatmosis says:

      02:14pm | 12/12/09

      Couldnt help but laugh out loud at some of the comments “No policies, just populism , conspiracy theories” was a beauty especially after putting up with the king of spin for 2 years and his “we are gunna do this” and “we are gunna do that” when in reality all he has done is spend like theres no tomorrow and said “sorry” twice, whoopy doo.“BRAIN DEAD NATIONAL PARTY MEMBER” was another that had me rolling on the floor .
      Its an unfortunate thing that the real brain dead cant see past the plastic face of our fearless leader and see what he is trying to do to Australia and every man woman and child therein. Pollies like Barnaby point out the failings of Mr Spin and his band of noddy dolls and this makes him a marked man for having the temerity to actually tell the people of Australia what is going on, this makes him a dangerous man as its well known that the Government doesnt want the people to know what is going on in their own country.

    • paul says:

      01:34pm | 12/12/09

      Yes you’ve been banging about Climategate for days Eric. Time for you to take a Bex and have a lie down son. I thought most humans were run by ideology dude ... why pick on scientists? I remember invading Iraq based on ‘Intelligence’. And I spent money on the Y2K bug because a qualified computer ‘engineer’ said so. Oh and the boffins at the meteorology bureau got it wrong the last 3 days in a row.  Epic fail Earthlings! Does Joyce have any policies: on continuing the massive subsidies to the energy sector in this country including potentially the nuclear sector; the future of farming in this country, including vital water questions; and does he have the balls to seriously go toe to toe with the duopolies and Abbot?

    • mcdazz says:

      01:02pm | 12/12/09

      Ha ha ha - Barnaby Joyce is a useless politician who speaks out not because it’s the right thing to do - but because it feeds his massive ego.

      Seriously - Barnaby Joyce would sell his own mother if it got him press coverage.

      His big mouth and his even bigger ego isn’t going to do Tony Abbott any favours.

    • mountcross says:

      12:28pm | 12/12/09

      What on earth was Abbott thinking whhen he gave this fool Barnaby Joke an important Portfolio ? Probably not much as it looks like Abbott sprouts anything that come s to mind himself - certainly not a future PM !

    • SB says:

      12:05pm | 12/12/09

      Barnaby maybe noiyce, effluent and a foxymoron, but he’s still a nutter.

    • Bruce says:

      10:47am | 12/12/09

      Maybe some people are to SCARED to listen to what Barnaby Joyce is saying. Why the problem, he must be hitting a raw nerve somewhere, he is after all a relatively new politician, he can not be to DANGEROUS !!!!

    • Allan says:

      10:36am | 12/12/09

      Barnaby has made it to the next level.
      It will be interesting to see if he has the discipline to be part of a team and it will be interesting to see if Abbott will be able to guide such a mercurial character like Bananarbie (as Matt Price use to call him) to best effect.
      At least Rudd now has to explain his policies.
      Just goes to show how colourless Wayne whats his face is.
      I had to stop and think who the first Joyce press release was referring to.

    • stephen says:

      09:59am | 12/12/09

      Dylan doesn’t know what he’s talkin’ about. Neither does this bloke.

    • Louis McLennan says:

      09:58am | 12/12/09

      Drew(Darlinghurst), you are a little lost?

      Because we all know farmers don’t get private educations or value education right? They just chuck their kids in the local state indoctrinate? They also have a really poor work ethic and no family values too!

      Get real mate. Farmers are a damned good opposition, they got the brains and physical/mental strength to take a pin dick like you on.

    • Jim says:

      09:56am | 12/12/09

      For God’s sake Penbo, isn’t Imre Salusinszky already one Dylan tragic too many? (Actually, Salusinszky is several Dylan tragics too many all in the one package). Still, I suppose it works ok this time, and when things go pear shaped for Abbott’s Mob I guess some sort of Subterranean Homesick Blues   will come over a few of his front-benchers.

      But whatever Barnaby is, and whatever he is smoking or channeling, it isn’t boring.

    • John A Neve says:

      09:55am | 12/12/09

      Eric @ 0922hrs,

      If you think the “scientific community are ideologically driven tossers”, just where do you get all your knowledge?

      Do they still put facts on the back of wheaties boxes?

      Do me a favour Eric, please explain this “political agenda” and tell me more about the “fake science”. You see I don’t eat wheaties.

    • Merlin5 says:

      09:51am | 12/12/09

      Just the same old bloggers jumping from blog to blog to rave on with their anti Liberal crap ons. Some of you guys should go get a job or a life away from your computers. The same people who crapped on about Howard then Nelson then Turnbull and now Barnaby and Abbott. Go you Kevy lovers!

    • AT says:

      09:34am | 12/12/09

      This country’s “beautiful vernacular” and Bananaby’s bellowings are two very different things. He seems to be putting on a show for his fellow ‘elites’ and the media in Canberra. He will “cut-through” the same way any other wacky comedian does (say Austen Tayshus); he fades into memory ten minutes after his set and he will be completely forgotten when his act becomes stale.

      Virginia Trioli was right.

    • Drew(Darlinghurst) says:

      09:10am | 12/12/09

      Mr Barnaby Joyce is just another BRAIN DEAD NATIONAL PARTY MEMBER.

      .....NEXT

    • Eric says:

      08:22am | 12/12/09

      Going after the scientific community as ideologically driven tossers is pretty easy when that’s what they actually are. Climategate has come at the right time for Barnaby, revealing the political agenda and fake science behind the global warming push.

    • T.Chong says:

      07:48am | 12/12/09

      The LNP is copying the “maverick” brand that McCain and Palin tried.
      No policies, just populism , conspiracy theories and neg approach.
      Amusing to see just how fast the LNPs backroom people muzzled Joyce.
      Guess the banks and finance community were not too pleased with
      national/socialist ideas from barnaby

    • persephone says:

      07:46am | 12/12/09

      Oh for Costello’s sake!!
      The job of parliamentarians is not to amuse the press gallery; it is not to slag off at the government du jour at every opportunity; it is not to impede good policy on the grounds of populism.
      It is to make decisions in the long term interest of their constituents, even when their constituents are ignorant about the basis for these decisions or do not understand them.
      It is their responsibility to listen to the experts, weigh up the evidence and make the decisions - and then sell them.
      It’s very easy to pretend to be one of the sheep, talk like a sheep and act like a sheep. That’s neither good leadership nor good politics.
      And in fact, Joyce is ignoring the majority of his constituents, seeking out those who agree with him and marginalising the vast majority of farmers - as respresented by the NFF - who do not.
      Insulting their main export markets is not a good move, either.
      Oh, and the ‘don’t lecture me smart guy’ brand of politics attracts less than 10% of the vote. Most people know that they don’t know everything, and listen to the experts over the politicians.

    • DWest says:

      07:03am | 12/12/09

      If Howard and his bloated army of spindoctors and tricky magicians couldn’t sell Work unChoices and other rusted on policies, why can Abbott with one rising star batsman Barnaby? Yes fear campaigns may work but not when many of us fear the madness of the Monk to begin with!  Barnaby might show Rudd how elitist and boring-speak he is becoming, but Barnaby might even show up how freaky and boring Abbott’s horror show of back-from-the-dead Howard minister- zombies is. The battle of the B-grade cricket teams! Riveting.

    • John A Neve says:

      07:00am | 12/12/09

      I like Barnaby, he puts our parliament into it’s true perspective; a place of fun and frivolity.  There is nothing serious about our parliament.

      With the death of live, home grown television programs, parliament is the closest we get to real entertainment. If only Barnaby and Sophie could work on a song and dance act. Barnaby would be the singer of course.

      With great sadness I feel our parliament has become an extension of playschool. The two main protagonists being reminiscent of Bill & Ben.

      So you all be good little kiddies and I might let you stay up to watch Question Time.

    • Delia says:

      06:29am | 12/12/09

      Great stuff Barnaby! I can’t help but like him, especially after 2 years of watching and listening to Kevin Rudd and his parotting robots.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

What about Weet-Bix? “@Slate: How to make pork-infused veggies: http://t.co/ZYOOxVVT

Lucy Kippist

@christoforpaine sorry! Actually thought I already was... Weird?

Lucy Kippist

@dreshubby you wont know until you try!

Malcolm Farr

Carbon tax?RT @danielsutton10: Terrifying number: Hewlett-Packard cutting 27,000 jobs worldwide to save $3 billion. #tennews#tenbreakfast

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Lying on a cold table in an unfamiliar place and undergoing a core biopsy was probably one of the most…

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

Red alert, ladies. Making jokes about your ability at work is not funny particularly at board level.…

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Punishing the baddies is only fun in the movies. In real life it’s messy, expensive, and fraught…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter