THE best thing about the mooted ban on climbing Uluru is that it gives slightly overweight, middle-aged white people who enjoy the occasional cigarette the perfect vehicle to forgo taxing exercise on the pretence of respect for indigenous heritage.

The worst thing about it is that it seems to be a bit of pre-ordained, politically correct posturing that will add to the nation’s ever-expanding collection of hollow symbolic gestures that do nothing to increase white Australia’s respect for, or understanding of, our Aboriginal history, and may actually work against it.

I have never climbed the rock and probably wouldn’t _ not just because I’m kind of lazy and would rather do the bus tour, sit down in front of the rock for a while, and get back for beers at sunset at the Yulara resort _ but also because it clearly distresses some Aboriginal people. It just seems kind of rude.

As Tory Maguire wrote on The Punch this week, if it is good enough for people to jump through hoops at other religious venues, such as mosques or cathedrals, by removing their shoes or covering their heads, then it’s probably fair enough that we adjust our behaviour and afford a similar respect to the first Australians.

The idea of climbing the rock as some form of personal odyssey or white man’s conquest also strikes me as a bit of a clapped-out 1970s concept, as evidenced by the triumphant T-shirt, ``I Climbed Ayers Rock’‘, which came in the one size, tight, so that your beer gut could peek out jauntily above your tropical drill shorts as you tightened the sandals and pointed the caravan towards Kings Canyon.

Why did you climb it, Nige? Because it was there, you could tell your mates triumphantly at the ensuing slide night - or these days, as the above youtube tourist video shows, after you’ve uploaded it to the web.

Funnily enough, it was the first white man to lay eyes on the rock, the surveyor-general of South Australia, William Gosse, who set the miserably low standard for our relationship with Uluru.

Gosse is rightly slotted by Tim Flannery in his excellent anthology The Explorers for writing what may be the most passionless and underwhelming sentence in the history of exploration.

``I was compelled to turn south and on to a high hill east of Mt Olga, which I named Ayers Rock,’’ reads the ripping account of his discovery on July 19, 1873.

Flannery writes that any man who could be confronted by a place ``almost hallucinogenic in its grandeur’’ and come up with such a flat account of how he named this ``high hill’’ after, excitingly enough, the chief secretary of South Australia, Henry Ayers, would find no place in his anthology.

The best modern-day chronicler of the vexed relationship between Australia and the rock is the former Darwin-based journalist Paul Toohey, who dissected the tensions between tourism, commercialism and Aboriginal heritage in a terrific piece in The Weekend Australian Magazine last year.

In his similarly excellent feature in The Australian yesterday, Toohey revealed that on reaching the summit, the first thing many white climbers do is have a wee or, worse, leave toilet paper to wash into the waterholes during the wet season. This was enough to convince me that the walk should be banned.

However, the issue that will grate with many Australians, black and white, is that the discussion about the rights and wrongs of climbing the rock appears to have been taken out of their hands and given to some government department that, in calling for a public debate,  seems to have concluded that the rock should be off-limits to climbers.

Not for the first time, Environment Minister Peter Garrett has found himself in a quandary where, on the proposed ban being revealed, he’s refused to indicate where he formally stands on the matter, despite saying his personal preference is that people do not climb. Garrett is pointing to the two-month discussion period during which the board of the Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park will make up its mind.

Whether or not the climb is banned, the issue will do nothing to resolve the bigger and more troubling questions surrounding the relationship between black and white Australia, or the more troubling aspects of so-called indigenous tourism.

As I said, I have never climbed or seen Uluru but the closest I have got is a depressing day in transit in Alice Springs, returning to Adelaide from Broome.

Aside from the fact it appeared to be about 60C _ which you should expect in the middle of the desert _ the real discomfort of the day came from witnessing two things.

One was a sickening all-in brawl in the main street where a drunk black guy pulled a branch off a tree and started laying into a woman, the backdrop for which was the string of airconditioned tourist shops selling dot paintings, woven baskets and skeleton art from the Tiwi Islands, where cashed-up tourists from the US and Europe chatted amiably with the predominantly white owners and staff, before shelling out for their own little slice of our indigenous heritage to brighten up the wall of their apartment on the Upper East Side, or in Cologne or Berlin.

Sure, some of these stores are owned by Aboriginal Australians, some of them work with co-ops, and the money is often channelled back to indigenous communities.

But a lot of it just seems to be the crassest form of commercialism, where affluent people can buy into an idealised fantasy.

The real story, sadly enough, was happening away from the airconditioning, the $19.95 clapping sticks and the compact disc of ethereal music inspired by Kakadu, lying smashed on the footpath to be tip-toed around as you headed back to the resort at the end of a hard day hitting the credit card.

Most commented

16 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • iansand says:

      10:21am | 11/07/09

      If you can’t solve everything solve nothing.  It has never been a very impressive argument.

    • Lobes says:

      02:38pm | 11/07/09

      “The idea of climbing the rock as some form of personal odyssey or white man’s conquest also strikes me as a bit of a clapped-out 1970s concept”

      You strike me as a fat guy hiding his clapped out body behind some politically correct convenience.

      Its total BS calling upon the Rocks alleged spiritual nature as a reason for banning ascents. Australia is a SECULAR country and even if it wasn’t we would be Christians for sure based off the demographics. If you want to live in a Theocracy why dont you buzz off to Iran. I’m sure the Mullahs could use your calm voice of reason against all those pesky protesters.

    • IanH says:

      04:54pm | 11/07/09

      I like climbing up hills.  No climb - no go !  I’ll find a bloody big lump of sandstone somewhere else to go to and spend my tourist dollar there.  Another backwards step in the name of political correctness.

    • heather robinson says:

      06:23pm | 11/07/09

      I would not climb Uluru either. What sort of community are we if we ignore the distress of those around us? A distasteful but correct image of a dominant culture standing on top of the rock and using it as a toilet, also a culture keeping the aboriginal peoples underfoot. Being disrespectful not only hurts others but also hurts oneself. Stopping and listening allows the possibility for a new appreciation.

    • Chris says:

      07:49pm | 11/07/09

      Hear hear Lobes. Those bloody Abos should go back to where they bloody well came from.

    • marsha says:

      08:28pm | 11/07/09

      hey, I know…we could go abseilling on the wailing wall…or dirt biking around and around that big black thing in mecca…or hows about a picnic on top of the alter at St Peters in Rome

    • Patrick says:

      08:39pm | 11/07/09

      I Climbed it with my family when i was about 7 years old, I don’t remember it being terribly difficult. I would do it again too, I care little for superstitious stories about some snake doing a giant turd in the desert, but I am however in favor of closing the climb to prevent stupid tourists going to the toilet on top of it. I mean really, you come to this amazing natural wonder and what do they do? they go and shit all over it.

    • SamGC says:

      02:01am | 12/07/09

      It seems that everyone has put in their 2 cents worth and I guess I am doing the same. Firstly in response to Chris, this is the problem, they came from Uluru so your statement of go back where you came from is completely null and void. For the remainder of you who insist on using vulgar language in order to express your point, we do have other words in the english language.

      It would be completely in opposition to the idealistic egalitarian Australian to ignore the outcry from the Aborigines. The natural formation to us is quite significant to them and thus requires a great deal of consideration. I find it reprehensible to start with that some people have chosen to comment on here with derogatory statements such as abo’s etc which purely and simply breeds intolerance.

      Personally I believe we should be able to climb the rock as the advantageous in my view outweigh the disadvantages, but I would certainly not dismiss their arguments like the majority of you seem to have, or to simply belittle their arguments to a simple misguided snippet to evoke humour.

    • Chris says:

      09:34am | 12/07/09

      Hi SamGC, that was actually the point I was trying to make. A statement as ridiculous as “the Aboriginies should go back to where they came from” is almost as ridiculous as saying that the original inhabitants of this land have no spiritual ties to Uluru. Apologies if my sorry attempt at satire wasn’t quite clear to you.

    • alan says:

      10:42am | 12/07/09

      I have no intention of ever climbing Ayers rock.  However I feel that if a group wants to claim selective ownership of what belongs to the citizens of Australia, they shouldn’t be subsidised with my tax dollar.

    • Michael says:

      12:04pm | 12/07/09

      I am against banning the rock climb, Australian natives will not be happy till every white man gets on a boat and returns to Europe, they can’t make that happen so they will settle for declaring bits of Australia white man free zones, just another step in their racist revenge campaign.

    • aChris Perth says:

      12:32pm | 12/07/09

      A few observations from one who has been to Ayers Rock 268 times as a pilot in the 70’s when the only hotels were little more than sheds at the base of the Rock alongside the gravel airstrip. No sealed roads. A geological wonder for all of mankind to marvel.
      I’ve climbed it 3 times for the challenge and ran around the base numerous times.
      Litter was insignificant. I didn’t see evidence of people fouling the summit. There were no fees to go there or anywhere else in the Top End.
      I rarely saw an Aborigine at the Rock and can’t recall any camps nearby.
      Is Australia becoming a commercial theme park for the benefit of a few and the exclusion of average Australians
      I wont go back as it sounds as thought my memories would be shattered and I doubt my children will bother with the fees and restrictions taking away any feeling of adventure.

    • Max says:

      07:00pm | 12/07/09

      It’s a rock, a natural wonder, if you want to climb it then I think you should be able to, relieving yourself on top of it is impolite simply because it’s a public place, you wouldn’t do it on the harbour bridge climb - so don’t do it at Ayers Rock.

    • Rossini says:

      06:51pm | 13/07/09

      If you “close” the rock why not close Sydney Harbour? People piss it as well!

      So what’s the difference?

    • Phil says:

      09:21am | 14/07/09

      Just returned from Uluru. Its a moot point to have this argument in this day and age because the climb is never open!!! The bigger issue is Australia has become a “nanny state” driven by our legal system. We were told by one of the local tour guides that the climb is closed over 200 days a year. Any excuse to close the climb the NPWS will. We were also told by tour guides that most foreign tourists come to climb the rock, close it and they won’t keep coming. Nearly every person we spoke to who were physically up for it wanted to climb and were disappointed they couldn’t do it. A perfect solution to ensure it is done with respect is to follow a similiar procedure as the harbour bridge climb. No photos, clip on harnesses, and learn a bit about the Anangu people, the history, etc. This way the yobbos won’t destroy it for everyone else.

      Peter Garrett…please don’t take the soft option and kill it. Leave some challenge and adventure for our children!!!

    • copeland blog says:

      08:32pm | 12/07/12

      Howdy. I came across your weblog your online. This is a good article. I will make sure to save this along with resume get more info of one’s information. Appreciate your post. it will undoubtedly go back.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Memo to Ford: You need to make things people actually want to buy http://t.co/duaZQ0CHQY

Daniel Piotrowski

Umbrella's probably a LITTLE unnecessary http://t.co/agbtHSlpmt

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @rhysam: Please read the SMH tomorrow. I get to say something both loving and true. (Ultimately, loving and true are the same thing)

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @newscomauHQ: Hazel Hawke, the former wife of Bob Hawke, has died surrounded by her family | http://t.co/wSl6QrnOtU

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter