With nothing coming out of Copenhagen to rile the world’s anti-green conservatives, they’re aiming their Hummers at Avatar, James Cameron’s decade-later follow-up to Titanic.

Blue is the new green, or red or something sinister anyway…

For his right-of-centre critics, Cameron is a new Michael Moore; a manifestation elitist Hollywood whose 3D spectacular is filling kids’ minds with terrible ideas like greed is bad and green is good.

Miranda Devine wrote a few days ago in The Sydney Morning Herald that Avatar is infused with “Cameron’s sanctimonious hippie sensibility.” That’s right, the bloke who made Terminator and T2 – movies in which explosions and a Republican Governor save the day – is a hippie. It’s not hard to see why Devine et. al. are going after Cameron.

It’s January, blogs need to be posted, column inches need to be filled and Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab is a bitch of a name to spell. Worse still, Avatar was the holiday film of choice for Socialist In Chief Barack Obama and his family.

Devine writes: “The snarling vipers of left-wing Hollywood have been let off the leash in a way previously unmatched in a high-priced blockbuster.”

Sigh. Honestly guys, pour yourself a whisky, open the latest Matthew Reilly and relax. Avatar is, as Nile Gardiner wrote in the UK Telegraph, “cynical and deeply unpatriotic propaganda.” But… who cares?

Filmmakers have a right to preach whatever they want; we have a right not to listen. Didn’t we go through all this with those tree-hugging penguins in Happy Feet?

Directors aren’t page one journalists and viewers have ample time to choose between Avatar and something more neutral in those half-hour ticket lines at the local Event cinema complex.

I won’t deny Cameron wields a a heavy, expensive, ideological hammer, as Devine calls it, in Avatar. It’s Pocahontas – the Disney version –  in space.

American boy (Sam Worthington) comes to help colonise-slash-destroy new land (the planet Pandora) and eliminate the natives (the giant blue Na’vi). Then, like John Smith before him, he hooks up with the chief’s daughter (Neytiri, played by Zoe Saldana using motion capture technology) and switches teams.

There’s even a magic tree; though, unlike in Pocahontas, this one doesn’t sing.

Avatar’s American marines are cartoonishly cruel, the savages are beyond noble and the GI Joe villain says things like “shock and awe”, “fight terror with terror”, yadda yadda yadda.

There’s not a lot of grey in the black and white of Cameron’s vision. It’s the kind of clear divide between good and evil a former President often referred to. And yes, the US does cop a hiding – the soundbyte-spitting bad guy is about as American as apple pie covered in pepperjack cheese, dipped in syrup and served with slaw.

Then again, the villain in Cameron’s last film was an iceberg. Does this mean he’s against the ETS?

One could take issue with several of Devine’s claims about the film. That it celebrates the murder of US troops at a time when the US is at war – Avatar’s troops are private contractors. Plus, the hero is a marine; a US marine.

That there is “blissful irony” in Cameron using expensive technology to make an anti-technology point – the movie isn’t so much anti-technology as against the misuse of it. The most advanced science in Avatar, after all, is the avatar program itself, and it is used to understand the Na’vi.

The greater irony might be that a film with an anti-capitalist message is about to make US$1 billion in less than three weeks.

But Avatar’s critics are essentially right. Cameron has madeover the “bitch” extraterristial of his early film, Aliens, and birthed an outer space race straight from the hearts and minds of leftist hippies everywhere.

As a (skim) latte-sipping leftie and current resident of New York, a place that makes Sodom and Gomorrah look like Amish villages, I’m delighted with the result.

And so should you be,  whether you vote Liberal or Labor.

As even its critics attest, Avatar is a great entertainment. If there’s an ideological undertone – or overtone – so what? Just slap on your 3D glasses, sit back and… disagree.

In her article, Devine is thankful for more “human-affirming” movies, citing Juno and Knocked Up as examples. Leftist critics have cried foul at both of those, reading into them a strong anti-abortion message. It’s been argued that the one says it’s better for pregnant teens to keep their babies while the other says career women should not abort theirs.

I don’t disagree with those sentiments, but I am pro choice. I didn’t feel the need to decry the hissing pythons of the right once the credits had rolled on either of those films.

I also tune in weekly to watch 24’s Jack Bauer save the world from extremists one mode of torture at a time.

Hollywood’s entertainments are driven by ideologies right and left – okay, mostly left – that we mightn’t like. Pointing them out is merely acknowledging the obvious. Avatar’s a big expensive ad for the green lobby. Okay, then what?

Does that discredit the entertainment?

Do we really need to waste any more time writing about it? Or for that matter, responding to those who do.

In my defence, they started it.

Most commented

40 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Diamantina Dick says:

      06:11am | 04/01/10

      err, James Cameron started it.

    • mid says:

      06:26am | 04/01/10

      Are the foundations of the “rightist” movement really that fragile that they need to attack a fictitious story for its message? How sad…

    • Sherlock says:

      06:36am | 04/01/10

      Agree completely. Saw this last night and it was a leftists, inner city, latte sipping, tree hugger’s wet dream.

      But it was only a movie and once you take out the CGI, not even a good one. The plot was one we’ve seen plenty of times before and like most american movies, everything was telegraphed well in advance and explained in minute detail for the lowest common denominator.

      The water cooler conversations about Avatar for the vast majority of people will be about everything apart from the inane plot.

    • Mikko says:

      07:02am | 04/01/10

      Totally agree Joel, it’s just a (great) movie - best sci-fi / fantasy film by far I’ve ever seen. I’m no greenie, and I believe climate change is driven more by nature than man, but so what? For almost three hours of escapism, Avatar is tops and if by the end of it I felt like kissing an alien or hugging a tree, or vice-versa, so what?

    • Super D says:

      08:02am | 04/01/10

      If James Cameron wants to limit the shelf life of the most expensive film ever made by basing it around current political fads then so be it.  I watched Australia over the xmas period and find the use of taxpayer arts money to fund a film which promotes myths surrounding the stolen generations far more offensive.

    • Nature always wins... says:

      08:09am | 04/01/10

      ‘Avatar’ is a “beautiful” movie - he graphics are great. The plot, however (as Sherlock said), is nothing new. Movies these days usually support nature. Have you seen ‘Wall-e’?... same message. And ‘Up’ - yep - the same. There’s a bad guy (American) trying to destoy/control nature and he loses.

      Nature always wins anyway - have you seen those little ferns growing in brick walls… I love it. It’s like nature’s little ‘F-you’ to industrialism.

      It’s easier to back nature as the good-guy - after all, it sustains us. And America/military as the bad-guy… well that’s a given these days too.

    • Davy says:

      09:08am | 04/01/10

      Saw the movie the other night and did enjoy it.  Being neither left or right but having some stong feelings in both directions I didn’t find it offensive.
      It is interesting though how public media such as films have the ability to alter subtely how the population thinks on particular issues.
      As special effects get better it will most likely become more difficult for people generally to distance themselves from these influences.
      Ideas can sneak in past the best defences if the carrying medium is good enough.

    • Tim says:

      09:11am | 04/01/10

      It was a great movie, but the plot was ridiculously predictable.

      I was actually hoping the humans won, it would have made for a much more interesting movie.

    • AdamC says:

      09:46am | 04/01/10

      I found the politics of Avatar irritating, but not as irritating as the lack of originality and the over-use of easy plot devices.

      In reality, I don’t think people get their politics from dumb blockbusters. Avatar doesn’t really warrant a newspaper column, unless its a film review column, of course.

      And I was baffled by those pro-abortionists’ criticisms of Juno and Knocked Up. There wouldn’t have been a storyline in those films if there had been a termination!

    • jed says:

      09:46am | 04/01/10

      cheers tim. i have no need to see it now you’ve graciously told me what happens.

    • Patrick says:

      10:18am | 04/01/10

      As a latte sipping lefty, it pains me to have to agree with Devine’s sentiments on this.

      When I go to see a movie I do not want to be preached at with not so subtle commentary about real world issues.

      I am all for the exploration of controversial themes and stories with parallels to reality, but I want to see it done properly. Issues of environmentalism, war, capitalism etc, where not explored in this film, despite the 3D effects, the story was completely cliched and two dimensional. No balanced view of any issues at stake, just jaundiced, straw man representation of them.

      I actually enjoy watching a film that properly explores complex issues and seems to be erring more towards a moral that is at odds with my own world view because it provokes me to think more deeply about the issue, but with Avatar I really left the cinema feeling like I had just been fed $300 million in poorly disguised propaganda.

      You might be optimistic and think that most people are smart enough to distinguish reality from fiction they see in movies. I don’t.

    • Tim says:

      10:38am | 04/01/10

      Jed,
      if you read this story and can’t pick the ending, i’m a bit worried for you.
      Avatar is no M. Night Shyamalan film.

    • Steve says:

      10:44am | 04/01/10

      The movie has made $1 billion at the box office, worldwide. Left him and the studio a profit of $500 million. Cameron should cut out his hippie image. He is a better capitalist than most.

    • SLF says:

      11:18am | 04/01/10

      Regardless of the politics…the problem I have is that it is a really bad film.

      Sure it looks pretty, but the dialogue, plot, characters are laughably bad. Oh and it goes on forwever. All Emperor’s New Clothes I am afraid, perhaps rather than spending all the money on new technology, Cameron could have diverted some of it to a decent script writer?

      The film kind of sums up much of modern culture, all style and no substance. Sure it looks nice, but is ultimately deeply unfulfilling.

    • Bill Thompson says:

      11:30am | 04/01/10

      The film is distributed by 20th Century Fox, the same outfit, incidentally, as produces the TV series 24. Ultimately it slithers out of the same bucket as this site.

      Greg Sheridan also had a go at this film in yesterday’s Sunday Telegraph. The article, interestingly, does not appear to have been reproduced online. Someone, somewhere, must have had to decide whether to give some more legs to an article attacking left-wing propaganda, or block the wider spread of criticism of a related company’s product.

    • Buzz says:

      11:42am | 04/01/10

      I read Miranda Devine’s article over the weekend, and was puzzled by the vitriol behind the piece ... why get so worked up over the leftist leanings of a James Cameron film, for heaven’s sake?
      For a moment I thought I was reading a Piers Akerman piece.

    • E says:

      11:48am | 04/01/10

      I think the problem is that children are the targets of this propoganda, not adults, and that their developing neural networks may be irrevecobly tainted with trendy ‘noble savage’ bollocks.

    • Mikko says:

      11:55am | 04/01/10

      Crikey, what messages do you guys get out of Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, Star Trek, Harry Potter, The Terminator ...  Hello, they are just movies, SF and fantasy escapism, like Avatar but for my money, not as good. And I only saw the 2D version, no 3D screen up here. Get a life or stick with movies that are bleak but deeply meaningful to you.

    • Jimbo Jones says:

      12:37pm | 04/01/10

      hmmm, remember when kiddies wouldn’t eat pork because they were all cute little piggies like ‘Babe’.  Avatar is just fun, nothing else.  The only real reason to see it is the 3D and the point is that alien sci-fi is probably a good basis to spin some 3D shots around (would haters prefer an ‘Out of Africa’ type film be turned into 3D - puh-lease). Miranda D needs to switch to de-caf, ‘snarling vipers of left-wing Hollywood’ bwaahahahah - good lord, it’s no wonder the newspaper industry is sliding rapidly into the ocean - who would actually pay to read rubbish like that?  It reads like something you’d find in the forums section at Aintitcoolnews dotcom (but only one fifth as funny). Aliens by the way has content that is definitely somewhat analogous to the vietnam conflict so the notion that Cameron is doing anything new by slaughtering US soldiers onscreen is wholly incorrect (he did precisely that in Aliens too… and lets not forget the cops that were shot in the station in Terminator).  On a final historical note, James Cameron’s first film was ‘Piranha 2’ - ecology fights back (and now he’s come full circle).  I look forward to more ‘cynical and deeply unpatriotic propaganda’ (but only if it has ‘splosions’ in it). Whooooo hoooooO!

    • Russell says:

      12:58pm | 04/01/10

      The suits at Fox (related to the people who run this site) do not spend $300m in order to bring down capitalism. They want to get their money back, and make a lot more as well. Mr Cameron sold them a product that was guaranteed to do that. Ms Devine, who based her critique on material already published in the US, is either (a) a cynic churning out column inches for fat rewards, or (b) seriously deluded.

      Personally, I think both. I saw the film In Sydney, and then again in New York with my family on Christmas Day at a packed cinema. I enjoyed it even more the second time. It is fabulous entertainment, nothing more, nothing less. It’s superbly crafted, and that includes the marketing.

      How all that could be conceived as “subversive” is just beyond me. Interestingly, her piece attracted 112 comments before they were closed off.

      Which explains why she is employed. But it isn’t because she can mount a coherent argument.

    • Kym Durance says:

      01:26pm | 04/01/10

      you right it is just a fillum! - but the attacks are predictable - Andrew Bolt laid into it as wel l- but then again he found an Anti American Sentiment expressed in Finding Nemmo and got all hot and bothered over that as well

    • thelma says:

      03:45pm | 04/01/10

      The Miranda Devine and Andrew Bolts of this world,mad. Very scary.

    • T.Chong says:

      03:47pm | 04/01/10

      Good to see fellow latte lefties blogging today. The Devine piece was a laughable spewing of angst and hyperbole.
      She and fellow Righters would be better off renting “The Green Berets” a very simple story, with their type of politics. The almost as bad “Flyboys” could equally suffice.
      It is only a 2nd rate movie with over the top CGIs, not taken seriosly by anyone, other than the Devines, and fellow McCarthyists of the blogoshere.

    • bec says:

      04:25pm | 04/01/10

      Tim, have you seen an M. Night Shyamalan movie recently? The endings are only unpredictable in the sense that there is no basis for them to exist if you are interested at all in things like “plot” or “character”. They arise out of nowhere to be as edgy and contrived as possible - like wanker boys in their early twenties who turn up to parties wearing racist teeshirts just to get a rise. Yawwwwwn.

    • stephen says:

      04:44pm | 04/01/10

      Star Trek is a much better movie. (Out now on blue-ray !)

    • Matt says:

      05:28pm | 04/01/10

      Another divide and conquer article.

      Cut the left / right b/s? People aren’t buying it anymore.

    • Sitting Bull says:

      08:26pm | 04/01/10

      I must be an undiagnosed terminal leftist hippie. I just thought it was a great movie.

    • Dan says:

      08:35pm | 04/01/10

      T,Chone, couldn’t agree more.

      Some of the critics of Avatar are ridiculous, and hyppocritical. “cynical and deeply unpatriotic propaganda”; does that mean that any filmmaker who questions their countries policies are unpatriotic? Give me a break.

      As for Devine, that woman is ridiculous. Her statements are so absurd that they shouldn’t be taken seriously. Firstly, the hero is not a traitor. He’s working for a company, not a country, so he’s not a traitor. But considering what the company does, one could argue if he didn’t do what he did, he would be a traitor to morality and human decency. Devine’s world view is so narrot that she probably regards Blackwater operatives as heroes, and conscientious objectors to be traitors. Furthermore, considering the war in Iraq, why shouldn’t Cameron critiique it? If the film was pro-Iraq war, would she talk about the snarling vipers of right-wing Hollywood? Of course not, she’s a hyppocrite. But even her critiques expose nothing more than her (unattractive) personal values; ‘Flaky pagan worship good’. Well, I guess it would be less flaky if it was Christian worship.

      She also lacks an understanding of the film. “Cameron has used the most advanced technology known to man to create an anti-technology movie about how much better are the ways of the noble savage”. Uh, no. Cameron is and has never been anti-technology. He has warned about the dangers of technology, especially in placing too much faith in it, but he is not anti-technology in the slightest.

      She also says that “But he defeats the purpose by indulging in the rancid partisanship that characterised the anti-Bush/anti-Howard left of the last decade” forgetting that there was an excellent reason why people
      were/are anti-Bush/Howard, and it was not the left was who rancidly partisan, it was right-wingers like her (and her colleague Gerald Henderson) who turned attacking the left into an artform and still does it every single week!

      The fact that she applauds the simplistic Juno is an indication of her lack of depth. She is truly absurd. But then again, who cares what she and her fellow hacks think?

    • martinX says:

      08:47pm | 04/01/10

      (sigh) It’s so hard to find a decent sci-fi movie these days. Avatar wouldn’t even be registering anywhere if it wasn’t for the CGI. Plot, people, not effects. Like Joel said, it’s Pocohontas. Or Dances With Wolves. Or Last Samurai… And, Stephen, the latest Star Trek was a big disappointment. Spock and Uhuru? As if. The whole thing was a toss off for the kids.

    • Colonel of Truth says:

      09:34pm | 04/01/10

      I’m just so glad I joined the Ar’mi and not the Na’vi. Khaki is so much more becoming than blue, don’t you think?

    • TB says:

      01:59am | 05/01/10

      Sitting Bull - in that case, I must be to the right of Mussolini, because I thought Avatar was a pile of boring, derivative tripe buried underneath half a billion dollars worth of special effects. Quite frankly, all I think James Cameron has managed to do is pass off a (metaphorical) mixture of parsley and cake frosting as haute cuisine (i.e. an enormous pile of garnish with nothing underneath).

      It’s so reassuring to know that my location in the political spectrum can be ascertained purely from my opinion of a film.

    • Sitting Bull says:

      07:46am | 05/01/10

      TB - I heard that the shaman of the Green clan, Bob Brown, is leaving. Some bloke called Bluey will probably get in at next election.

    • SLF says:

      08:58am | 05/01/10

      I saw Avatar described today as ‘Dances With Wolves meets the Smurfs’.

      Genius and not far wrong.

    • Nuff Said says:

      12:04pm | 05/01/10

      Oh….....my…......god!!!

      When did every person on the planet become a critic. Geeeeeezus!

      James Cameron’s best friends “Oscar & Golden Globe, BAFTA and $$$$$$$” I am sure care little for the opinion of a whinger like Devine or any other monkey for that matter!!

      IT’S A MOVIE!!!!!!

    • Jasper says:

      04:08pm | 05/01/10

      Hey Matt: “Another divide and conquer article. Cut the left / right b/s? People aren’t buying it anymore”

      Couldn’t agree more, I am so tired of columnists & readers allowing their thinking to be done by description of politics that was created in the French Revolution and lost any meaning it had left with the fall of the Berlin Wall.

      The political shorthand of right and left don’t mean anything anymore and seems to be used as an excuse to stop listening and start manning the trenches. It is destroying political discussion and removes any possibility of compromise.

      Maybe newspaper columnists should start thinking for themselves rather than writing to their own and the audience’s prejudices.

    • acker says:

      06:33pm | 05/01/10

      Joel ??? “American boy (Sam Worthington) comes to help colonise-slash-destroy new land (the planet Pandora) “

      Born in England grew up in Perth WA…probably not far from Heath RIP
      Went to NIDA with Matthew Newton…hardly an American boy !! cripes

    • Bekah says:

      12:35am | 06/01/10

      Great movie - loved the characters, loved the story.

      Give a crap about the unpatriotic bulls*&% comments - but hey, I’m sick of TV and movies made by (predominantly) americans that assume that America is a) the centre of the universe and b) have the right to do what they like, just because they’re American.

      Honestly - (spoiler alert!) one of the last lines in the movie says it all for me - the ‘aliens’ were leaving….  About time someone made a realistic comment that showed Americans (in this case) did not have the right to just take over, just because of a perceived superiority.  Wish more world governments would take note of THAT message.

      Besides - the special effects (with or without 3D) were fantastic - and I can understand how the project was shelved for many years… so those who are trying to draw extreme conclusions to its message… what, you’re saying James Cameron can predict the future too?

      Oh - and just in case - I’m someone who has ‘environmental’ ideals - we should certainly try to minimise harm - but also a so called ‘climate change denier’... so don’t try shoving all who enjoyed the film into a categorical basket.

    • JGNY says:

      08:25am | 06/01/10

      What a phony. Saw the flick, it was OK. Period. Cameron lecturing us about the green garbage is no different then Michael Moore and Al Gore with their lying Movies and phony peace prizes. What drove cameron is Money, period. The hype of this mess created the interest and the over the top graphics keep them coming back. For a socialist, Cameron, like Moore and Gore are only in it for the money. The same as Obama with his book deal and the Clintons with their speaking tours at $100,000.00 a pop

    • IMHO says:

      03:09pm | 06/01/10

      I raise my beer to The Colonel (10:34 4/01):

      “I’m just so glad I joined the Ar’mi and not the Na’vi.”

      LMFAO !!

    • The Nihilist says:

      05:47pm | 10/01/10

      I don’t think climate change is a big thing this movie. It’s more about imperialism and biodiversity.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Lucy Kippist

A story that's close to my heart - can living overseas change your life for the better? With thanks, @Alisa_reduxhttp://t.co/n6tksJstqs

Malcolm Farr

@Kittu64 That's true. Pretty sure I referred to "high salaried" women.

David Penberthy

@michelangeloruc not at all mate it is a great story and photo

tory_maguire

@nswpolice very polite and helpful officers manning the Pyrmont road closures this morning

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter