The World Economic Forum recently released their 2009 Global Gender Gap Report, and unfortunately Australia has slipped markedly in the ranks over the past couple of years.

Michael Atchison of The Advertiser

The report measures how equally the resources and opportunities of a nation are divided up between genders.

In 2006 Australia was ranked fifteenth. Now we are twentieth out of the 134 countries included in the report. The Nordic countries topped out the list with Iceland coming first, Finland second and Norway and Sweden were third and fourth respectively. New Zealand retained their position in fifth place.

Even though Australia has slipped in ranking, we have made progress in the overall index scores so at least we aren’t going backwards in that regard. Our nation has still achieved a reasonable result, coming in before the US and Canada but Australia is lagging behind poorer countries such as Sri Lanka, Lesotho, South Africa and the Philippines. We did well in education attainment, ranking equal first with several other countries, however there are some areas which have dragged us down and are in need attention.

Australia is doing particularly poorly in political representation. Women make up only 27 per cent of parliament, and only 24 per cent of ministerial positions. To put this in perspective, Afghanistan wasn’t included in the report but 28 per cent of their parliament is made up of women- over the 25 per cent mandated by their constitution.

Australia has achieved equality in literacy, primary education and secondary education and women were more likely to undertake tertiary education. However the gains in education haven’t filtered through to the workforce.

Australia came fiftieth in labour force participation, with only 69 per cent of women in the workforce, versus 82 per cent of men. Women did have the edge on men in professional and technical professions but were poorly represented in managerial, legislation and senior official positions. The wage gap is also fairly significant. Australia ranked sixtieth in wage equality for similar work and men are pulling in over US$10,000 more on average.

Women are also more likely to be unemployed. The unemployment rate for women is 4.77 per cent, whereas for men it is 4.03 per cent.

What can Australia learn from the top five countries?

What they all have in common is a high participation rate of women in politics and most had female heads of state at some point in the past 50 years. All of the top-five also had some form of state funded maternity leave.

In Iceland a woman has governed for 16 out of the last 50 years. Women make up 43 per cent of parliament and 36 per cent of ministerial positions. Iceland still had a large pay gap and of legislators, senior officials and managers women only made up 30 per cent. However women were almost on par with men in labour force participation.

In Finland, in 10 of the last 50 years, a woman has been the nation’s leader, women make up 58 per cent of ministerial positions and 42 per cent of parliament. Labour force participation was close to equal.

In Norway 10 of the past 50 years had a female head of state, 56 per cent of ministerial positions were held by women and 36 per cent of parliament.

Sweden also had fairly equal participation in politics with 48 per cent of ministerial positions held by women and making up 47 per cent of parliament. However, they have not had a female head of state in the past 50 years.

New Zealand has had a female head of state for 11 of the past 50 years and women held 32 per cent of ministerial positions and made up 34 per cent of parliament.

In all of the top five, wage equality is still a way off and the percentage of senior positions held by women hovered around 30 per cent. However women had a longer life expectancy and were more likely to attend tertiary education. State-funded paid maternity leave was a common thread in the most successful countries and perhaps is an integral component to ensuring women’s participation in politics and public life.

Most commented

21 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • WHR says:

      06:18am | 12/11/09

      Iceland coming first? That sounds like a fantastic nation to aspire to.

      Also, tin pot nations like Afghanistan, Sri Lanka and South Africa are still not ideal nations to aspire to even if in one metric they seem to be ranked ahead of us.

      Women do have a higher unemployment rate but I would say that it is plausibly connected to the fact that the GFC has hit industries which tend to employ a lot of women, also a 0.7% difference isn’t as big as it could be.

      The low participation rate for Women I would suspect this is partially due to societal factors and the fact that women can reproduce (all by their own choice however). A chunk of the women not participating are likely a product of a unintuitive system which perhaps doesn’t support their needs in their own way but I would still say a very large chunk are not participating by choice.

      Also with respect to wages, if you take a graph of female wages as a proportion of male wages over the last 30 years you can see the big dip due to the GFC. This basically reinforces the types of industries women tend to work in. A graduate nurse and a graduate engineer may well graduate on a “fairly” similar wage but over 10 years the wages growth is very different. I would suspect the ABS would have some data on gender composition of these industries and I would strongly suspect they are polar opposites.

      Also, you forget the UK and Germany with respect to female political leaders. Margaret Thatcher was one of the longest serving PMs of the UK and is one of the best regarded. Angela Merkel is was also recently re-elected and has formed a coalition government with a like minded party. Conservative women don’t tend to fit the narrative though, right?

      Otherwise, good read!

    • Liz says:

      06:54am | 12/11/09

      Too right we need proper parental leave and 50% women in Parliament.Maybe we should consider ourselves lucky the gender gap is measurable those days.

    • Eric says:

      07:27am | 12/11/09

      Women live seven years longer than men, yet they receive more specialist health funding and research. Women achieve better educational outcomes than men, yet they have access to female-only scholarships and other advantages which are denied to men.

      Women are at a huge advantage in family law and law in general. Over ninety per cent of prisoners are men. Three quarters of all victims of violence are men, yet only women have special anti-violence programs dedicated to them.

      Men are either vilified or ignored by the media. The Punch publishes dozens of one-sided feminist articles like this every month, but has yet to publish a single article about men’s issues.

      Stop whingeing. You’ve got it great.

    • Daniel says:

      07:37am | 12/11/09

      The issue of Equality for Women will be ongoing until we get a Greens government basically. Anyone that thinks any differently has their head in the clouds.

    • sundance says:

      07:39am | 12/11/09

      Why do so many young contributors insist on wearing sunnies in their photos?

      Or is it just the young, hipster contributors?

      Or just plain hipster??

    • mw says:

      08:44am | 12/11/09

      The pursuit of equality is pointless and insulting. Men and women are different. It’s about time people came to terms with this and started focusing on EQUITY, which unlike arbitrary gender balance targets is in everyones best interest.

    • E says:

      09:06am | 12/11/09

      Was a bit put off by the surname, any relation?
      Apart from that, the pay gap issue is a bit misleading. Its women who choose low paying low social status careers, theres nobody stopping them being engineers or something useful. But for some reason women tend to be attracted to service industries (hopsitality), the bullshit economy (marketing, PR, media, advertising) or ‘caring’ (nurse, social worker etc).

      The first will always be low paid because its low skilled.

      The second is a product of doing namby pamby pretend degrees with no maths or logic, and are parasites sucking the life out of the productive economy. So basically they should be fined for showing up to work in my opinion.

      And the third should be paid better, its an historical artifact that nurses and teachers are so poorly paid, because it was once considered womens work, and thus the women were expected to have husbands, so it was ok to pay them less. This thinking has now been overturned, but the poor pay and conditions remain.

      Its suprising that managerial positions arent dominated by women, since women are presumed to be socially more adept than men, and management is essentially a social reward for doing the correct ‘bee dance’ rather than any measurable talent or ability. Must be an entrenched ‘boys club’ on top of being sinecured pretenders.

    • Joel says:

      09:17am | 12/11/09

      Thank you Eric. So true. “Violence Against Women: Australia says no”. What is that?! Why not just “Violence: Australia says no”. Why is hitting a man any better than hitting a woman, regardless of who is doing the hitting? Yes, woman may still have the rough end of a wage disparity (likely due to some extent from women choosing to have children - a biological act that men simply cannot do), but men have higher levels of mental illness, are the ones killed in combat (rightly or wrongly) and are more likely to victims of assault.
      And Liz, surely having women in Parliament simply to fulfil a quota isn’t what you want? Shouldn’t our elected officials be just that - elected - based on their (perceived) merit? Isn’t that the feminist ideal - equality of opportunity?

    • E says:

      09:46am | 12/11/09

      Im not pro-feminist, im not pro-male, im pro-people

    • Jason says:

      10:02am | 12/11/09

      Women need to step up in order to narrow the gap.  Apply for higher paying jobs, choose more lucrative areas of study and hey - get into politics.  Run for parliament.  Women have all the same opportunities - it’s difficult for men sometimes as well.  Being a competitive world, complaining that you are losing will solve nothing, seeking to win will.

    • Melissa says:

      10:14am | 12/11/09

      @E - you’ve got issues.

      Your definition of marketing: The second is a product of doing namby pamby pretend degrees with no maths or logic, and are parasites sucking the life out of the productive economy. So basically they should be fined for showing up to work in my opinion.

      I wish you could see how ignorant you appear with that statement. Get a life. So you would prefer marketers stayed at home on the dole rather than turning up for work? Great, i hope you’re ready to work hard and pay your taxes so i can stay home watching TV then.

      I hope you one day own a business, or launch an innovative product, so you can really see where you’d be without marketing. But with your close-minded attitude I can’t really see that happening.

    • Emma says:

      10:22am | 12/11/09

      I was never in favor of quotas or anything like believing that people should be elected to parliament or promoted in the work place on merit, but thats just not reality is it? I think its rubbish to say women aren’t trying - perhaps they are not trying to be men…is that the problem?

      This shouldn’t be a men vs women debate but instead collectively we should be able work out how to get equal representation so we are utilising all the talent and skills of both sexes.

      I think measurement is a tool which is missing in the debate - countries and companies than measure key aspects of males and femal pay and conditions generally are the ones that identify the problem and fix them. If we need quotas to make this behavioural change then bring it on. What the hell are people scared of…a feminista take over?!

      And “E” your comment about women choosing the wrong professions is rather misguided…I am sure your view might change if/when you need to be attended to by all the women working in the ‘caring’ professions.

    • Steve says:

      11:20am | 12/11/09

      To right! We also need 50% of women in the dangerous professions where loss of live and limb is ever present. If women want equal representation in governance they must equally share the burdens and not live the good life off the deaths of boys to men. No more self preserving sexism from our “oppressed” women!

    • Al says:

      11:53am | 12/11/09

      In a nation like Australia, with strong legislative protections against discrimination these number do not reflect entrenched sexism but rather choice and circumstance.

      When one looks at the average wage for example it is not a case of women getting paid less for the same job, rather it is about the professions people are employed in.

      Take for example the differences in pay between poorly educated men and poorly educated women. Retail and childcare are poorly paying industries and is a popular option for poorly educated women. Mining, Oil and Gas, Labouring etc are all well paying industries and are popular options for poorly educated men. At the end of the day people of particular genders are, for whatever reason, attracted to certain types of work. Yes I know people in these industries are not all poorly educated by a long shot.

      There are similar factors influening the other stats in the article.

      Using numbers like those in this article to make sweeping statements without any analysis makes you look foolish.

    • davido says:

      11:55am | 12/11/09

      Any survey that rates Sri Lanka above Australia in terms of equality of the resources and opportunities to each gender is a complete JOKE.

      Go to Sri Lanka and you will find out what gender inequality is really about.

    • stephen says:

      01:34pm | 12/11/09

      There’s a town in Iceland where the residents scrutinize new arrivals to decide if they are ‘suitable’. Presently, there are no blacks living there. I’ll bet the women leaders in that country are nice and white.
      Angela Merkel is also a Physicist, so she isn’t a dummy.
      If women want success, they shouldn’t rely on gender to force equality. It is, of course, in a Nation’s best interest to reward the best and brightest, and to do otherwise is to usurp the efforts of those who rely on talent alone.

    • jim morris says:

      01:35pm | 12/11/09

      95% of library staff australia-wide are women. Considering the gender equity and diversity bla-bla I’ve been unable in 6 months to get an answer from any government department as to why this is so. Now I’m being threatened with legal action by the local council for even asking. Are there any honest women out there?

    • NCG says:

      02:58pm | 12/11/09

      Jim: I’m interested in what legal action the council could bring on such a valid question? Its not like you were being derogatory, its a simple observation and one I wouldn’t mind knowing the answer to as well.

    • Jasper says:

      08:05pm | 12/11/09

      Jim Morris, I’m a guy who works in a library and I can answer your questions. Considering the staff turnover here for the last 3 years I can say with quiet confidence that the reason why 95% of library workers are female is because 99.99% of the applicants are female.

      If you don’t have men even applying for positions you can’t hire them.

      Secondly, you’re asking the wrong people, local libraries are run by local councils, not state and federal governments so no department would be able to answer your question. If you’d asked your local council they would have told you what I said above: it is 95% women because 99.99% of the applicants are women.

    • Kit says:

      09:56pm | 12/11/09

      To those who claim that women are earning less because they are in lower paid fields, please read the report.  It says ‘wage equality for similar work’ with women earning 68% of man’s income for similar work.

      To those who say that women choose lower paid fields, historically when women have entered a field in any substantial numbers, generally the pay and status of that profession goes down.  Marketing is a good recent example.

    • jim morris says:

      12:00pm | 13/11/09

      jasper; I became interested in the female/male ratio after having an application for a library job rejected; even though I had worked in the library whilst studying at university. If what you say is true then why isn’t there a gender equity programme in place to even things up, as exist in other areas where there are less than 50% female employees?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter