Leggies. Googlymen. Chinamen. Mystery spinners. Australia chooses spin bowlers to take wickets, not merely to tie up an end.

Until now, that is. Andrew Hilditch, the chairman of Australia’s selection panel, recently enlightened us on his view of the role of spin bowling in Australia’s forthcoming Ashes campaign.

“The word attacking is a bit overrated really”, he declared. “...it’s about asserting pressure and performing the role the captain wants…Nathan (Hauritz, the only specialist spinner chosen) did that very well in the times he’s played, because we wanted to tie up an end, assert pressure from that end, keep pressure on batsmen and relieve the fast bowlers.”

Hilditch’s theorem is, in the words of Australian cricket’s (pub) philosopher-in-chief Andrew Symonds, un-Australian.

For the Australian cricket team, attacking spin bowling has invariably been a potent weapon to deploy against the English.

The first Australian purveyor of the googly, H.V. ‘Ranji’ Hordern, took 32 English wickets in the Ashes summer of 1911/12.

When Australia whitewashed the English five-nil in 1920/21, leg-spinner Arthur Mailey claimed 36 wickets. To this day no Australian has ever matched his feat, achieved at Melbourne, of nine wickets in a Test innings.

Leg-spinner Clarrie Grimmett, the Sly Fox, tortured English batsmen at home and away for a decade, starting at the age of 33 with eleven wickets on debut in 1924/25.

Grimmett and Mailey took 27 of the 41 English wickets to fall in 1926. Grimmett dominated by himself in 1930, with 29 victims. He then formed his famous partnership with the patron saint of Australian spin bowlers, Bill O’Reilly. The two of them took 53 of 71 English wickets in 1934.

Chinaman bowler Les ‘Chuck’ Fleetwood-Smith joined O’Reilly in Australia’s successful Ashes defences in 1936/37 and 1938.

Jack Iverson took up cricket at the age of 31, after he completed active service in World War Two. Four years later he was bowling for his country. He bowled like no man before him, with the ball gripped between the thumb and middle finger, a grip developed over decades of flicking a ping pong ball. He spun Australia to victory at Sydney to retain the Ashes in 1950/51, and took 21 wickets in the series. And then he retired.

Iverson, the subject of Gideon Haigh’s haunting, moving Mystery Spinner , one of the very finest of cricket biographies, had taken the cricket world by storm.

In 1958/59 new captain Richie Benaud led from the front, claiming 31 English scalps as Australia regained the Ashes. His twenty minute spell before tea on the final day at Old Trafford in 1961 ensured their retention.

Even the modestly credentialed leggie Peter Sleep won a Test for Australia in the otherwise dire Ashes summer of 1986/87.

Since 1993 Shane Warne and Stuart MacGill have claimed 234 wickets between them in Ashes Tests.

The great spinners – Grimmett, O’Reilly, Warne – attack and tie down the batsman at the same time.

The most recent Ashes Test, at the SCG in January 2007, was Warne’s last. The Australians repeated the feat of 1920/21, completing a five-nil whitewash.

Since then Australia has tried seven different spinners: Stuart MacGill (four Tests), Brad Hogg (three), Beau Casson (one), Cameron White (four), Jason Krejza (two), Nathan Hauritz (three) and Bryce McGain (one).

Twelve months ago Beau Casson was Australia’s incumbent Test spinner. He debuted in the Caribbean, took three wickets and has not registered on the selectors’ radar since. White, Krejza, Hauritz and McGain have all leapfrogged him into the Test team. He’s now had his Cricket Australia contract taken off him. When the Ashes series begins next month Casson will be running around in Darwin grade cricket.

What did he do wrong? We’ve never been told. The selectors are guilty of gross mistreatment of a talented young cricketer.

Bryce McGain was ranked our best spinner when the Australians toured South Africa. He suffered a horror Test debut, and has been cast aside.

Clarrie Grimmett, with only one Test under his belt, returned figures of 0 for 174 for South Australia against New South Wales prior to the selection of the 1926 Ashes tour squad. He still made the tour.

Grimmett did take eleven wickets in his Test debut. McGain took none. But Jason Krejza took twelve. That earned him just one more Test from Hilditch’s panel.

Spin bowling invites aggressive batting. Sometimes a spinner will cop a belting. Copping a belting is an occupational hazard.

There has been no consistency in this selection panel’s treatment of Australia’s spin bowlers.

Now Hauritz is the favoured one. A man with a strike rate of 95 in first class cricket, a containing off spinner suited to the middle overs of the limited overs game, will carry the torch once held by Grimmett and O’Reilly, Benaud and Warne.

Grimmett devoted himself to coaching the art of spin bowling. He wrote numerous coaching articles: “A bowler must live, think and practise aggression …. the bowler who employs negative tactics to keep runs down is wasting time.”

The current Australian selectors are utterly clueless when it comes to spin bowling.

10 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Daryl Melham says:

      11:24am | 26/06/09

      A fine piece. I’m sure there are a few politicians that could also supply second rate spinners.

    • Steve says:

      11:53am | 26/06/09

      Our best spinner will be our VC. Picking Horroritz brings to mind some of the shocker picks in the pre-Bobby Simpson as manager days in the 80s and when G Yallop was fighting R Hogg after Hoggy walked off for a pint after a 4 over opening spell (G Boycott lbw Hogg 0). T. Laughlin, M Bennett, P Carlson, J Higgs, A Mann, J Gannon. Actually they all have better domestic cricket records. Mmm

    • Neill Jones says:

      12:15pm | 26/06/09

      Bill O’Reilly’s chapter in Cricket: The Australian Way was “Defy the Batsman”.  Still a sound piece of advice.

      So what’s the answer? Pick quicks and have Katich/Clarke/North share the load?

      Not sure what Melham is on about.

      http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-841438246387500778

    • Pauli says:

      01:03pm | 26/06/09

      The problem isn’t our mediocre spinners, the problem is that we aren’t doctoring the pitches enough to help them. Just toast them or flood them according to national need.

      And I’m sick of this ‘it’s so unAustralian’ rubbish. It stops us from learning and applying dirty tricks that others are perfecting while we’re so worried about bleaching our whites.

      While the kiwis prepare their pitches like rice paddies so their talentless lot are competitive and a hundred Indian groundsmen sweep the pitch with blowtorchs before a game to crack it up we’re preoccupied looking for another Shane Warne.

      Foley, get off your high horse and settle for pragmatism. It actually sits comfortably with your egalitarian streak. The mediocre will get a leg up. Everyone will be equal. Everyone will be happy.

    • peter warrington says:

      01:21pm | 26/06/09

      Melham’s on the East Hills line like most of Australia’s sporting greats.

      I reckon the big error was not blooding one of the kids who were doing OK at the time in the dead rubbers (Melbourne and Sydney) in Ashes 06-7. They could have played Warne + 1,and Clark and McGrath, or played Gilly at 6 and played Lee as well. we’d still have the Ashes and Cullen Bailey might now have 150 test wickets.

      feel for McGain but no second chances at 36. in fact should be no first chances.

      our SMH mate DM traces the decline to the restructure of grade cricket to be more and more about limited overs matches. bowl darts, in short spells. no more 20-over spells for young leggies to perfect their craft. smart guy, DM.

      Steve, you touch on but miss the horror-est pick of that time - R B Simpson hisself. he was a dud captain the first time, anyway.

      as for this series, of course Casson and Krezja were robbed. especially the latter. but I suspect it won’t matter. and I think Hauritz is slightly better outside the one-dayers than I have generally given him credit for.

      moral of the story - sack Hilditch. and ban all solicitors, from everything, everywhere. especially establishment wannabes from Adelaide/Sydney, unless they live on the East Hills line.

    • peter warrington says:

      01:51pm | 26/06/09

      and I’ll still keen to be reminded who the supertest team of 83-4 were. G Lawson and 10 batsmen?

    • RT says:

      01:17pm | 29/06/09

      Thanks, Luke. You failed to mention Hilditch’s predecessor as Chairman, Trevor Hohns, a leggie who failed to distinguish in four tests. Can’t remember whether he was of the attacking or timid mould. Your mention of Arthur Mailey, one of the great characters of cricket history, brings to mind that he opened a shop when he retired. He hung a sign ‘I used to bowl tripe, now I sell it’. He once took 10/66 against Gloucestershire and called his autobiography ‘Ten for Sixty Six and All That’. When going for a lot of runs he would tell his captain ‘I expect to take a wicket any day now’.  As a young bowler he dismissed his idol, the great Victor Trumper, and later wrote ‘there was no joy in me, I felt like a boy who killed a dove’. Can’t imagine a Warne having that emotion.
      And Fleetwood-Smith - was his ‘Chuck’ tag a reference to his action? Remember when Warne was in his heyday and we all expected generations of great spinners to come forward, inspired by the master? Hasn’t happened.

    • Haydos says:

      06:34am | 30/06/09

      CAsson and McGAin are the answers to Australia’s lack of spin talent? Your joking, right?

    • Haydos says:

      06:38am | 30/06/09

      I think its in the same league as saying Shane Watson is the answer to the Australian teams injury problems . . .

    • matt says:

      12:58pm | 14/07/09

      I think an elephant in the room is the inability of captains at all levels of the game (including i would suggest at Test level) to bowl spinners and set fields that promote attacking spin bowling.

      Very often you will see captains at junior and grade level immediately place fielders on the boundary when they put their spinner(s) on. Usually the spinner is brought on when a batter is in and is seeing the pace bowlers rather well. But what we end up seeing from the captain is an instant sign to the bowler that a. their captain has very little faith in them and b. that they are not there to take wickets.

      I think more work needs to be done at the grass-roots to promote good captaincy of spinners so that they do not become meek and mild early on.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Lucy Kippist

@christoforpaine sorry! Actually thought I already was... Weird?

Lucy Kippist

@dreshubby you wont know until you try!

Malcolm Farr

Carbon tax?RT @danielsutton10: Terrifying number: Hewlett-Packard cutting 27,000 jobs worldwide to save $3 billion. #tennews#tenbreakfast

Malcolm Farr

@IanHanke That was indeed him.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Lying on a cold table in an unfamiliar place and undergoing a core biopsy was probably one of the most…

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

Red alert, ladies. Making jokes about your ability at work is not funny particularly at board level.…

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Punishing the baddies is only fun in the movies. In real life it’s messy, expensive, and fraught…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter