Lawrie Sawle is the most unrecognised contributor to the Australian cricket supremacy of the last two decades.

Our victorious 1989 Ashes team was the product of foresight and planning under Lawrie Sawle's youth policy

A West Australian school teacher and administrator, Sawle became Australian cricket’s chairman of selectors in late 1984. Earlier that year the Sydney Cricket Ground Test played host to the retirements of the three giants of the national team, Greg Chappell, Dennis Lillee and Rod Marsh.

Soon Australia was being beaten by everyone. The captain resigned in tears. A majority of the first Test team chosen by Sawle’s selection panel had already signed secret agreements to rat on Australian cricket and tour apartheid South Africa.

When Australian cricket reached its nadir, Sawle insisted on planning for the long term. He repudiated previous ad hoc selection policy.

In those dark years Sawle and his fellow selectors promoted young men they identified as possessing not only ability, but the desire and determination to be part of new captain Allan Border’s side for the long term – 23 year old David Boon, 19 year old Craig McDermott, 20 year old Stephen Waugh.

Sawle led the restructuring of youth cricket. He closely followed under-19 cricket, identifying the Waugh twins, Ian Healy and Mark Taylor at under-19 carnivals.

Success was a long time coming. Border’s captaincy record on the eve of the 1989 Ashes tour was one series victory from ten. But eventually, when the young cricketers identified by Sawle matured, they formed the core of the most successful national team in the history of the game.

From the Caribbean series of 1995, when Mark Taylor’s side captured the Frank Worrell Trophy, to the final Ashes Test of 2006/07, Australia won an astonishing 95 of 140 Tests, drawing 21 and losing 24.

In a rerun of 1984, Sydney’s New Year Test of 2007 was the scene for the farewell party for another Big Three of Australian cricket, Justin Langer, Glenn McGrath and Shane Warne.

Between mid 2006 and the first week of 2009 eight members of the all conquering Australian sides of the 1990s and 2000s finished their Test careers. Among the eight were three genuine greats in Warne, McGrath and Adam Gilchrist. The other five - Jason Gillespie, Damien Martyn, Langer, Stuart MacGill and Matthew Hayden - were very good to excellent Test cricketers. 

Between them these eight men compiled 31,659 runs, captured 1740 wickets and effected 859 catches and stumpings over 755 Test appearances.

The man who has attended more Test matches than any other human being, Richie Benaud, chose Gilchrist and Warne in his greatest ever eleven, alongside only two other Australians, Bradman and Lillee.

As in the mid-eighties, Australian cricket is rebuilding its national team. Now, as then, it will take time. Only one giant remains, Ponting.

Since the 2007 Sydney Test Australia has won eleven of 23 Test matches, drawing five and losing seven. Two series have been lost, against India away and South Africa at home.

It stands to reason that results will be patchy, as newcomers either find their feet or fall away.

The new entrants to the side are being tested as they never have been before. That is why the game is called Test cricket. Test cricket thoroughly examines the skills, technique and character of its participants.

In his brief career Phillip Hughes has scored hundreds at Sheffield Shield and county level, and for his country in South Africa. He is comfortably the finest Australian batsman of his generation. Yet his technique leaves him vulnerable to high quality fast bowling directed at his body. He is currently being tested by the ferocity of Andrew Flintoff, the finest current exponent of intimidatory fast bowling in world cricket.

A constellation of young batting talent burst on to the Australian scene in the early nineties. Most of them arrived via Sawle’s elite youth pathways. Each of Hayden, Langer, Martyn, Gilchrist, Slater, Bevan, Elliott, Blewett and Lehmann were born in 1970 or 1971.

Each one of these nine was posting big Sheffield Shield scores, regularly, by the early 1990s. Each one of these nine was building a case for national selection by his early twenties. Each one of these nine eventually became a valued member of a champion Australian Test team.

Today there is one batsman in Australian cricket aged in his early twenties, posting big Sheffield Shield scores, regularly. Not nine. One.

Nowadays too many thirty-something cricketers who will never play for the national team hold down spots in state sides. Australian cricket needs Phillip Hughes to succeed at Test level.

Mitchell Johnson came to Test cricket having bowled less deliveries, at all levels of cricket, than any Australian opening bowler since Peter Garrett’s great grandfather Tom took the new ball at the age of 18 in 1877.

Johnson is still learning his craft. He was lethal in Durban, woeful at Lord’s. Lillee, who knows a fast bowler when he sees one, called the teenage Johnson a once in a generation fast bowler.

More is at stake than this Ashes series. Australia must build a team for the next decade.

Michael Clarke will lead the side, sooner rather than later. Hughes, Johnson and Siddle will be part of it. Others must be found.

Lawrie Sawle rejected short termism. Australia must back its best young cricketers.

Most commented

19 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Rob M says:

      08:05am | 23/07/09

      I wonder how many talented young athletes want to be professional cricketers these days ? The competition and increased professionalism of the various football codes over the last 10-15 years has given Cricket Australia a major headache.

      As noted above,  the last great generation of Australian cricketers were born at the start of the 1970s and would have grown up during the mid-late 1980s when it was commonplace for (then) VFL and RL players to hold down day jobs. This is practically unheard of today.

      Of the two other codes, Rugby Union was still an exclusively amateur sport during the 80s/early 90s and soccer had the now defunct NSL - a part-time national league backed by various post-war migrant community groups.  Times have changed.

    • iansand says:

      09:11am | 23/07/09

      It’s money.  In the olden days a player played for a few years for a pittance, then left the team to get a real job.  Now, a player will never again earn what they earn as a cricketer so they hang on in their twilight years for as long as they can to earn as much as they can.  So we have a team stacked with journeyman old farts who only spark themselves up for an innings or so when the commentariat are baying for the blood of non-selection.

      Not that I begrudge them what they earn, but we need the selectors to be more ruthless.  In part to ensure that fresh blood is always flowing, but also pour encourager les autres.

    • Antony says:

      10:08am | 23/07/09

      It hurts to lose any Test against England, especially early in a series. But despair is a long way away.

      I thought Phillip Hughes looked OK in the 2nd Test and was unlucky in both digs. He didn’t seem rattled by Flintoff, unlike some of our batsmen under fire from Bob Willis in the 80’s.  Hughes’ calmness under pressure reminds me of Steve Waugh.

      Hilfenhaus is bowling well, improving with every Test - and he’s two years younger than Johnson.

      I agree with Foley re Hughes & Johnson - they are standout talents. I rank them higher than Siddle, who I’d bracket with North, S.Marsh, Ferguson and Hilfenhaus as real potentials.

    • RT says:

      10:22am | 23/07/09

      That’s all very well in theory but that group born in 1970 and 71 was extraordinarily talented and they went on with playing cricket instead of other passtimes. A similar group is yet to emerge. There is no spinner in sight with a fraction of Warne’s talent, and no bowler with the talent of McGrath. The article didn’t mention young players of the Sawle era who were tried and didn’t make it. The selectors of today have to work with lesser lights like these.

      There are some talented players in the Australian squad and let’s stick with them through rough patches. Let’s hope Johnson recaptures his form and we don’t feel tempted to turn to an old, injury prone bowler like Lee. Let’s   recognise when a player is ageing and ease him out of the squad. 32, 33 is old enough for most players to think of ending their time at the top level. An ageing player of declining abilities relying on the loyalty of fans and selectors to keep his spot is being purely selfish and the selectors who go along with that need to be more ruthless. Cricket is a young person’s game.

    • Dave says:

      10:56am | 23/07/09

      iansand

      It’s good to see you won’t be one of those complaining about players retiring early from test cricket to go play in the IPL.

    • iansand says:

      11:25am | 23/07/09

      Dave @ 10:56 What a peculiar mind you have.  What makes you think I would complain about that? 

      I think people should be able to hawk their talents wherever they want.  I think the NRL salary cap is an illegal restraint on trade.  I fall about laughing when the NRL complain about players going to Union, and vice versa, or players choosing to go the England or France for a few years.  But I also think that anyone who does go to the IPL, or changes football codes or countries, does so at the risk of selectors taking that into account in the future.  They are big boys and it is entirely their call.

    • josh says:

      12:51pm | 23/07/09

      Salary Cap a restraint on trade? You have to be kidding right? The sports market demonstrates well the market principle. Look at English soccer teams get brought out by billionaires who then spend big got get a dream team. This may work in larger sports markets, (like the EPL) but if the NRL or for that matter the AFL, drop the salary cap then you would significantly dilute the product.

      Anyway, I think this tour more than any other will bring in question Ponting’s captaincy he can’t have too much longer to go; maybe the return Ashes in 2010/11 will be it?
      A look to youth will be needed. But will the selectors have the guts to do it, if it means losing a few more games and series’?  I don’t think they would, that is why Lee and Clark are still around. The Australian cricketing public have got used to winning for the last 15 years, that a return to the bad old days could reduce Cricket’s Australia’s coffers, who wants to see a team being beaten?  It is a tricky line to balance, bring in youth for experience or retain an older team that wins to maintain cash flow.
      In years past the Australian A and even B teams would have challenged the test teams of most nations. Not so now.

    • iansand says:

      01:22pm | 23/07/09

      The need of a salary cap to protect the NRL and AFL from the depredations of larger and wealthier codes suggests that it is, in fact, a restraint on trade.  Without it the codes might sink to their proper positions in world sport - somewhere around lacrosse (and I may be insulting lacrosse).

    • josh says:

      01:43pm | 23/07/09

      iansand, I think you miss the point of the salary cap. It limit’s the price of players wihtin a competition, it has no bearing on external competitions.  It doesn’t and won’t protect the NRL (or AFL) from wealthier codes.

      You could argue the salary cap, makes players go looking for more money and in that way it reduces the quality of the competition. But then that is no different to you leaving your current employer to go to a job that pays more.

      The cap doesn’t mean they are only worth a set amount or can’t look around for better offers.

    • iansand says:

      02:13pm | 23/07/09

      If there was no salary cap the NRL and AFL clubs would go broke because they could not afford what their players are worth on an open market.  The competitions would fold, and both sports would be played by semi-professional blokes who were garbos and labourers in their real lives.  Like it was 25 years ago.

      I do argue the salary cap could make players go looking for more money and in that way it reduces the quality of the competition.  Try watching the English Rugby League before the Sunday Channel 9 AFL coverage.  You will recognise quite a few names.  They aren’t there for the weather.  Nor is Sonny Bill Williams playing in France for the culinary delights of frogs’ legs and snails.

    • RT says:

      02:47pm | 23/07/09

      I don’t quite follow your reasoning on the salary cap, iansand and I tend to agree with josh. You may be right that it’s a restraint of trade but it’s only an effective one where there is no alternative competition as in the case of the AFL. The salary cap is not helping to protect the NRL from poaching by other wealthier competitions, it’s probably causing it to happen more than it would be otherwise.

      I think when it comes to sporting competitions I’m a free marketeer. It’s too late to attempt to preserve the vestiges of the competitions where garbos and brickies play on suburban grounds on their days off. Sport is increasingly going global and corporatised. Those not able to cut it at that level will be reduced to the suburban park amateur level, which will always be with us. It’s not a bad thing. Not that you were suggesting it was. I don’t think.

    • iansand says:

      03:49pm | 23/07/09

      The salary cap by the NRL is an attempt to preserve their fully professional competition in Australia by putting a cap on player earnings (not administrators or coaches - it was ever thus).  Some players can leave for Union or to the UK.  Some, like forwards, simply do not have the skills to move to Union.  It is a long time since there has been a scrum in League.

      Without the cap several clubs would already have collapsed.  Others would have become uncompetitive because they could not afford competitive players, which would be a precursor to collapse.  How many clubs are financially healthy now, and what financial position would they be in without a salary cap?  I reckon we would have a 6 team competition, if we were lucky.  And how much worse would things be without Leagues Clubs?

      I agree that rugby league is a code that will slowly die as a fully professional sport.

    • Jo says:

      04:07pm | 23/07/09

      I agree Foley. Where are the young guns? There can be no real renewal if the old blokes don’t move on. These rules should be applied elsewhere too ... like politics for example. I think Hughes and Johnson have what it takes but this series was always going to be tough. Bring on Edgbaston

    • peter warrington says:

      05:29pm | 23/07/09

      Logan’s Run.

    • Noelo says:

      06:26pm | 23/07/09

      That’s a very interesting comparison you make between the young guns of the 70s and the lack of them now Luke. It does raise the question about whether enough resources are being put into schoolboy cricket or if professionalism has seen a too big a concentration of the booty go to the elite level of players.

      It’s hard to iomagine Australia plummeting too far after such a long golden period but look what has happened to the West Indies. Anything is possible if you aren’t nurturing the kids.

    • Haydos says:

      08:35am | 24/07/09

      Yeah well I think you are having yourself on suggesting any one individual or planning had anything to do with it . We were just particularly blessed (especially by my arrival on the scene) with talent and at the moment we are not. Elite athletes either are or are not. They arent ‘built’ and far less are they manufactured. The lack of a me or of a McGrath or a Waugh or a Lillee or aa Chappell has nothing to do with selectors and a lot to do with genetics. We will be blessed again undoubtedly but for the moment we must struggle on.

      On another note good to see that the young fella has superbly taken over where I left off, having inhereted top type of luck I was having. Oh and Straussie don’t kid yourself no-one will ever forget what you really are. No-one.

    • Peter Warrington says:

      12:31pm | 24/07/09

      In reflection, many of us have been hard on P Hughes. Even a committed futurist like me.

      But his scores and dismissals have an element of wobble.

      Yet, he says, he got an inside edge at cardiff that could have gone for 4 like kp and bopara all season. An unlucky glove at lords to a dire ball. And a nick to a rampant flintoff that didn’t carry.

      So he should go out at Northants and relax.

      Having conceded that, if he stays, the Poms will continue to choke him. That’s ok, I’m sure he has the mind to grind.

      But it concerns me that Kat will have dropped anchor, too.

      Aussies need to win a test, preferably this one. They can’t be trundling along at 2 an over.

      Solution - open with Clarke, who can knock the ball into gaps, rotate the strike. Has looked rock solid against pace.

      Katich 3

      Ponting 4

      Hussey 5

      North 6

      Spook the poms, mess with their plans, roll the dice. If we get to 50 in good time and with Hughes set, cruise till tea then hit the afterburners and be 500 by lunch day 2. Anderson broad and onions easy pickings. Strauss will freeze.

      as for the quicks, it would be better if Lee just retired rather than continue to hover around the edges talking himself up for the 4th test. Ponting should send him home, and declare his faith in the youngish Fab 3.

      —-
      as for the Foley thesis, absolutely, and it starts with Shield. NSW, who I despise, the only team seemingly interested in youth. Guys like Elliott hanging around for way too long. give them decent super rather than longevity.

      the other thing about Sawle was they had no choice. retirements (albeit overstated in their impact) and rebel tours had ripped the guts out.

      but it’s a good strategy, consistent across history. one day I will finish that stats analysis that compares longevity and success across debut age. if you’re not in young, you’re not gonna be in for long. Jaques, anyone?

    • Padraig Collins says:

      04:35pm | 28/07/09

      Big clearout due after the Ashes I reckon.

    • jasons100 says:

      08:21pm | 18/02/10

      This isn’t a question about being built or manufactured, it’s about the selectors not pulling their weight to find new players. I do believe that having a good system in place will breathe skills and finess but your right in saying that these things are genetic and not manufactured. However I did contact a few friends over at http://www.knowyourcricket.info and we talked in length regarding this issue. i also have a friend whos got incredible skill but just a lack of opportunity in australia. so now he had to travel to england to find his feet and make a name for himself. It’s the selectors who aren’t doing enough scouting around at the junior ranks and my junior i dont mean peewee. They just dont have a quality system in place so young kids wanting success in cricket can find it or atleast know what to do to get there instead of going overseas or just becoming a forgotten name in the winds of change

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter