US President Obama and Russian President Medvedev will attend the sixth East Asia Summit in Bali this Saturday, November 19.  This historic development will make the East Asia Summit one of the world’s most important leadership forums.  It will also be another signal of a continuing global power shift that will make the 21st century the Asian Century.

Sayonara, economic supremacy! Pic: Gary Ramage

US and Russian participation in the East Asia Summit represents an extraordinary achievement for an Asian integration process initiated by (originally 6, now 10) ASEAN countries during the Cold War. US military primacy will continue for at least for the first half of the 21st century, highlighting the importance for Australia of the ANZUS alliance.

President Obama will celebrate the 60th anniversary of ANZUS this morning in a speech to a joint sitting of the Australian Parliament. The ANZUS alliance protects Australia with US nuclear deterrence capability that is likely to remain an effective deterrent of military adventurism by a ‘rising’ China.

US nuclear deterrence is important to reinforce stable global security, but China’s asymmetric nuclear deterrence capabilities also raise the risk of an unacceptable degree of Mutually Assured Destruction in a US-China conflict, making the notions of military hegemony and major power conflict historical relics in the nuclear era.

The principal arenas of global major power competition in the 21st century will be economic, not military.  Although it is the world’s largest single national economy, US economic primacy is rapidly approaching its “use by date”. 

Asian dominance of economic power competition in the 21st century will make it the Asian Century. The most important economic integration development in the 21st century will not be the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) that was so much ballyhooed at the APEC summit in Hawaii hosted by President Obama earlier this week. 

The TPP was started by four countries (Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore) and five others (Australia, South Korea, Malaysia, USA and Vietnam) agreed at the APEC summit to negotiate to join the TPP. The 1994 APEC Bogor Declaration set a target of free trade and investment between developed APEC countries by 2010 (which has not been met), and extending to developing APEC countries by 2020. 

The table below shows that an APEC FTA would a huge FTA, but it would also be the very difficult to establish and maintain. That is why the TPP has emerged. The TPP and APEC are secondary prospects.

China, India, Japan and South Korea will focus on the main game, ASEAN-based integration processes, and Australia should too, despite Australia’s role in the origins of APEC. ASEAN+3 (China, Japan and South Korea) summits led to negotiations towards an East Asia Free Trade Agreement (EAFTA).  ASEAN has concluded FTAs with each country, and China, Japan and South Korea are negotiating a trilateral FTA. 

Japan initiated countries including Australia, India and New Zealand into the ASEAN+6 participants in the first 5 East Asia Summit (EAS) in 2005.  Russia also attended the first EAS in 2005 as a guest of host country Malaysia, and left with economic and security cooperation agreements. 

Japan also initiated consideration of a Comprehensive Economic Partnership in East Asia (CEPEA) at the second EAS.  ASEAN has concluded FTAs with Australia, India and New Zealand.  All ASEAN+6 countries are negotiating towards a CEPEA and the ASEAN+3 countries are negotiating towards an EAFTA.

In 1998, former Chinese Communist Chairman Deng Xiaoping reportedly told the then Indian Prime Minister, Rajiv Gandi that “The twenty-first century can only be the Asian century if India and China combine to make it so.”

The economic rise of China and India necessarily involves a relative decline in the economic power of the US, but the US will remain a major economic power long after it has been “passed” by China’s aggregate GDP, especially if the US focuses more effectively on international competitiveness.  Aggregate GDP is a very crude measure of economic power, which gives no weight to the prospect of continuing US advantages in terms of accumulated wealth, capital markets, multinational corporations, and technological innovation. 

However, Asian integration adds a dimension to prospective global economic power changes.  The table shows that an ASEAN +6 or CEPEA combination already exceeds the US and EU economies in PPP terms.  Russia already has an economic cooperation agreement with EAS members.  The table indicates that a combination of a CEPEA+Russia FTA (32.5 per cent of GWP) would pose the US with a group that it would be difficult for the US to reject joining.

Politically, the expanded EAS+2 will include 6 democracies (Australia, India, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea and the US) and six semi-democracies (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Russia) which together constitute a substantial political counterweight to the six autocracies (Brunei, Cambodia, China, Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam).

ASEAN’s cooperative security objectives were embodied in the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia (TAC), which has become an important issue in ASEAN’s relations with non-ASEAN countries. It is a notable ASEAN achievement that China, India, Russia, South Korea and the USA have all acceded to the TAC. 

The Obama administration decided to accede to the TAC in July 2009 and this was followed on November 15, 2009 by the first ASEAN-US Leaders Meeting, and a second in New York on 24 September 2010. The third ASEAN-US Leaders Meeting will take place on November 18, 2011 in Bali, along with bilateral meetings between Obama and the leaders of China, India, Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines. The EAS agenda will include reinforcing a 2002 ASEAN Regional Forum agreement of China and the littoral members of ASEAN to peaceful resolution of their claims to the Spratleys and other Islands in the South China Sea.

The Asian region, including Australia, has much to gain from China and India ‘rising’ within a CEPEA (ASEAN+6) or EAS (ASEAN+8) context, with ‘capitalist peace’ based on interdependence and confidence building measures enhancing mutual interests in cooperative security. The ‘capitalist peace’ potential of Asian integration is demonstrated by the reconciliation at a bilateral summit between China and India in April 2005, which reflects their common relationships with the wider ASEAN-linked integration process as well as a decade of bilateral diplomacy.

Supporting the balanced regional influences of China, India, Japan, Korea, Russia and the US in this growing Asian integration process and reinforcing cooperative security has major strategic and economic importance for Australia and the region, reinforcing the prospects for a peaceful Asian Century.

Note: Table is reproduced from: David Lundberg, “Asian Integration Models, Australia and the US.” Refereed paper presented to the 18th Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia in Adelaide, 5-8th July 2010.

Most commented

24 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Joan says:

      07:25am | 17/11/11

      USA military in Australia is hardly the friendly way to welcome anyone .  Its about as friendly as China setting up military shop in East Timor or Cuba.  I thought the symbol for peace and friendship was a Dove not military jackboots or arms.

    • Erick says:

      11:41am | 17/11/11

      @Joan - Your analogy fails.

      Australia is a lot further away from China than your two examples are from the US or Australia. And there are several countries in between Australia and China.

    • marley says:

      08:01am | 17/11/11

      I’m not sure that I entirely buy the argument being made here. Russia and the US may have acceded to assorted trade and security agreements with Asian nations, but neither is an Asian country itself, and neither has a primary loyalty to Asia.  They will each work and trade with Asia, but that’s not the same thing as saying they’ll be integrated into it. 

      Both will always have economic interests outside the Asian region - interests which may well clash with those of their Asian business partners.  The Russians will continue to look to western Europe on trade issues;  the Americans are already far more integrated with Mexico and Canada than they will ever be with China or India, and have plenty of interest in pursuing further integration with South America as well.

      So, while Australia certainly needs to continue to expand trade and cooperation with Asia, is it in our best interests to commit all our eggs to that one basket?  Or do, as the Americans and Russians will do, and play the field?

    • fml says:

      08:35am | 17/11/11

      David, whats that thing on your head?

    • gobsmack says:

      08:58am | 17/11/11

      Lol.  I was wondering the same thing.

    • neo says:

      09:11am | 17/11/11

      Afro? Russian “ushanka” winter hat? A beret?

      We have a mystery on our hands!

    • Jaxxs says:

      09:16am | 17/11/11

      It appears as though the sky has fallen on David’s head.
      Must be related to the Carbon Tax, because it’s black sky.

    • fml says:

      09:33am | 17/11/11

      I think he is a secret rasta and thats his rasta hat to hold his dreads,

      Its too big for a beret and probably lives in a place too warm to wear a ushanka!

    • neo says:

      09:55am | 17/11/11

      Australia farewells Obama, welcomes Asian Century blud!

    • David Lundberg says:

      01:10pm | 17/11/11

      Mate this is a Russian worker’s hat early 20th century.

    • Stiffy says:

      08:16am | 18/11/11

      I believe that it is the collective weight of David’s knowledge on this matter.
      or
      A dead cat.

    • Michael R says:

      09:12am | 17/11/11

      Fatalists who unquestioningly herald the “Asian Century” are dangerously value-free commentators masquerading as journalists. Who in their right mind wants a world or region ruled by China?

      The Asian Century is not a forgone conclusion. If the West comes to its senses it will realise the insanity of letting China rise to power and hence very quickly either (a) return manufacturing to the West or (b) find other developing nations to make our goods.

      Obama’s popularity has tanked in unision with the US economy. So the US public is ready and waiting for a new model of economics that does not suicidially transfer economic and military power to the ultranationalist Chinese.

      Further, if an ultranationalist political party rose to power in Australia or the USA, the media and public would be rightly outraged and move heaven and hell to dimish its power. Yet, bizarrely, such a power exists in China and we are disturbingly besotted with pollyannic love for it. So much love that we want to see it bestowed as the global superpower. Have we gone mad? Apparently so.

    • Alf says:

      11:28am | 17/11/11

      @Michael. “the insanity of letting China rise to power”

      You make it sound like we had a choice.

    • Frank says:

      12:47pm | 17/11/11

      @Alf, we had a choice. Or at least Bill Clinton did.
      He thought he was opening the door to the PRC to sell them millions of cars etc.
      He sold giving the PRC most favoured nation status - automatic access to WTO - on that basis.
      He was of course, wrong.
      He succeeded in pulling millions of PRC out of poverty, but, has probably cost the free world its freedoms.
      Obama’s country is being screwed by the PRC, Free Trade and the WTO.
      His ability to maintain let alone grow his military is dependent on his ability to grow his economy. He no longer has this ability. If he stimulates the US economy, the stimulas will, on the whole, wash quickly out of the US domestic economy, and slip over to the PRC where the stimulus will be mostly felt.
      The irony of the stimulus being funded by the PRC is not lost on me.
      The same applies here.
      This has been accentuated by the bloating of our consumer - import intensive - uncompetitive, big cities.
      Done for political reasons, to pimp its supporters, the bloating of our population consumes some 2 billion of new debt per week.
      So, the way forward is clear.
      A trade war.
      A return to protectionism.

    • Wilson says:

      10:23am | 17/11/11

      A powerful china will never be as threatening as some of the mainstream media portray it to be. History has shown China as rather reclusive when it came to international affairs, with 1.3 billion people its main focus is still on its greater population. But it can not afford to compromise its strategical interest within asia, especially when they are faced by their so called “adversaries” on all fronts.
      Economically speaking, i think an “asian century” is inevitable largely due to globalisation,  the conditions for which the west can recover (historically speaking post WW2 as an example) is no longer there, asian nations BRIC included on the other hand have the capital / resources / capacity to grow. The west have piles on piles of debt, deteriorating infrastructure and in some cases serious social instability. Take the US for instances, its current national debt is almost 15 trillion, but its unfunded liability is a whooping 100+ trillion yet the Obama administration continue to run 1+ trillion deficits, they keep printing money drastically devaluing their currency while at the same time slaming china as a “currency manipulator”.

    • Richard says:

      11:08am | 17/11/11

      Oh so you’ve been to China and gained an intimate understanding of their current National psyche have you? Oh no, wait, that’s me who has. And let me tell you, they are a very Nationalistic, Militaristic and Jingoistic people. They straight are, I know them intimately and state the truth.

      Within 5 years they will have the largest GDP in the world, along with the sort of military purchasing power that brings with it. On all the maps in China, Taiwan is depicted not as a separate country, but as a dependent province wholly belonging to the Central government in Beijing.

      What about when China starts mining for minerals in our sovereign claimed territories in Antarctica? They are already gearing up to do so. They feel left out because Antarctica was carved up before they became an international power (soon the world’s pre-eminent power). With global warming, mining in Antarctica becomes very very lucrative, and China is gearing up to do it in OUR territory. What then?

      These questions are not easily answered. China is not our allies. They are totalitarian dictators. They are evil. Look at the repression of Falun Gung. Falun Gung has done NOTHING at all wrong, yet they are imprisoned, tortured and executed. Corruption is rampant in China. Environmental degradation is rife.

      Don’t get me wrong, I love China and Chinese, I love their food and their culture, their history and their philosophy. I’m a practitioner of their medicine. Yet they are currently ruled by the most sinister and evil government on earth, and EVERYONE in China (well basically everyone, the vast majority at least from what I can tell) ADORE their government.

      So the question really is, what next?

    • Trevor says:

      11:24am | 17/11/11

      Wilson

      “History has shown China as rather reclusive when it came to international affairs…”

      The United States had a policy of isolationism too until they were ‘coaxed’ into WWII by the bombing of pearl harbour. I believe that Karl Haushoffer will be vindicated in the end, China will soon need it’s leibensraum in both a population and resource context.

      ‘In times of war prepare for peace, in times of peace prepare for war’. -Von Clauswitz (I believe)

    • Trevor says:

      12:31pm | 17/11/11

      Richard

      “...Falun Gung has done NOTHING wrong…”

      The Chinese Government might be megolomanical, but they aren’t stupid. The reason that Falun Gong is targetted is because their core belief is one similar to anarchy, which is totally against authoritarianism.

      I’m not saying that its right, but there is a reason for the crackdown. They don’t want this spearding. If Falun Gong was only about the breathing excercises it would just be called ‘Qi Gong’.

    • neo says:

      12:33pm | 17/11/11

      Antarctica does not belong to any country, as recognised by international law, and the area can be used for scientific research, as it is.

    • Richard says:

      05:12pm | 17/11/11

      “Recognition of Australian sovereignty

      Australia’s claim to sovereignty over the Australian Antarctic Territory is recognised by the United Kingdom, New Zealand, France and Norway.[5] Japan does not recognise this claim,[6] and Japan does not recognise the Australian claim to the Australian Antarctic territorial waters in which Japanese ships conduct whaling. [1]

      Mining in Antarctica

      For the past 20 years, Australia has been in debate on whether or not to allow mining on the mineral rich continent.[7] Several mining proposals have been taken to the ballot, and all have been defeated.[8]
      On the 9 August 2011, influential Australian think-tank, the Lowy Institute, published a report warning Canberra against complacency when it comes to its claim. [9] The global treaty banning resource exploitation becomes reviewable in 2041[10], and some states may then decide to withdraw from it considering the continent’s mineral deposits. These include coal seams, manganese, iron and uranium, while Antarctica’s forecast oil reserves are estimated as among the largest in the world after Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. Lowy’s national security fellow Ellie Fogarty said in the paper that Australia cannot adequately patrol its claim, lacking the kind of ski-planes it needs to reach some areas. It also lacks an ice-breaking ship in the region.”

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Antarctic_Territory

    • Trevor says:

      11:46am | 17/11/11

      “...reinforcing the prospects for a peaceful Asian Century.”

      Well with the Asian nations starting to form the collective security arrangements etc they are looking like an earlier version of Europe. I’m not sure that any Asian Century will be peaceful. In fact I would bet against it…

      The real issues are never discussed at these regional forums. For example the many territorial disputes that plague the region. It more resembles a circlejerk of back slapping and indulgent wanking while these issues are left to fester for fear of destoying international goodwill.

      Like anything, when these issues finally manifest themselves the results will be much worse than if addressed earlier…

      Peace? Not in humanity’s lifetime.

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      03:34pm | 17/11/11

      Now that the CHOGM junket is over, the APEC meeting in Hawaii consigned, if anyone can be bothered to do so, to the archives of the Media - if not to history what is next for Ms Gillard?
      She has told APEC what to do. She has shown she has a good sense of humour & that she gets on well with Barack & Michelle.
      Now it’s back to the hum-drum of local Australian politics, putting up with the bullying by Bob Brown & Christine Milne & their Green Senators. Sorry, Adam, but you, at present, are irrelevant in the scheme of things.
      The bounce in the Polls - to which she & they keep telling us they pay not the slightest bit of attention to (another Porky Pie, Julia et al.?) was simply because she was oversease & performed quite well. Back home with Barack she could just as well not have been there. Such is Barack’s personal popularity here in Australia it would not have made any difference if she had been home in bed with the flu!
      She wants to sell Uranium to Indiaso they can use Uranium supplied by Russia to build Nuclear Weapons to blast the shit out of anyone they don’t like. Pakistan will probably be the first cab off the rank! Our Uranium is, guaranteed, to be only used to make electricity!
      She still won’t support US using OUR Uranium to create all that electricity we so desperately need for the future.
      It’s good enough for others to use our uranium to produce cheap energy & build their countries into Industrial Powerhouses but our stupid F!#$%&g Australian politicians won’t allow us to do so and thereby we stand in danger of losing our entire manufacturing capability altogether. Not that there is much left anyway.
      Julia would rather worry about some stupid 14-year-old brat caight buying drugs in Bali (Throw away the key, Indonesia) than the dozen or more children she has locked up in prisons here without charge or trial. We are reliably told that those Indonesian & other children who were caught crewing the so-called Smuggler’s Boats did not, for the most part know what they were being employed to do. So far as Julia, Kevin & Bowen are concerned those children can rot but that uncontrolled, neglected Australian 14-year-old deserves all the support the ALP Government of Julia Gillard can give him.
      Is that Sheer Hypocrisy or not?
      . She wants to open up our land so that Foreign Troops can invade &  occupy it, without reciprocal rights being granted to our troops!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@Cmdr_Hadfield @mattpturner Hope you have sweet views while you heal

Lucy Kippist

RT @HeatherSmithAU: Can living in another country change your life for the better? by @lucyjk on @newscomau f. moi http://t.co/E5Ma3kBut2

David Penberthy

@mooks83 sophisticated response. Think the kids parents saw it differently

David Penberthy

More class from 9's footy show, lampooning a baby that allegedly looks like Sterlo with a pic swiped from Facebook http://t.co/BGoYP6Pn68

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter