Eighteen months ago, the world was in peril.

Leading edge: A technician at the Hallet wind farm in South Australia.

Ice shelves were melting and sea levels rising as a future threat to our cities.

Everyone from the G-8, Al Gore, Stern and Garnaut were warning us.

Fighting this attack on our way of life had to be the moral and environmental equivalent of war. But then, there came a “bigger” threat.

Our bank balances, shareholdings and jobs were at stake. Bandits running banks and insurance companies in the United States built a house of credit cards that had now collapsed.

Suddenly, the threat of global warming became a second-order issue.

Action now became action deferred.

Action, yes - but not yet.

Yesterday’s Senate vote in Federal Parliament over emissions trading was a signal point.

Those who want to squib on this issue and play games have delayed judgement once again.

Most commentators, journos, business leaders and politicians have no idea what a CPRS really is.

Deep down, even they know that.

On the surface, it would seem that dealing with climate change is essentially the task of national governments, acting internationally.

That’s true, but 80 per cent of the decisions that impact on the environment are made at regional level.

So, even with all the focus now on Canberra, there is no room for a cop-out from state or regional governments around the world.

After all, it was the Australian states that proposed the original plan for an emissions trading scheme, and then commissioned Garnaut.

So what, I hear you ask, is South Australia doing about climate change and renewable energy?

Early in June, I announced that 33 per cent of South Australia’s power generation would come from renewable energy by 2020. This target is bold, even in international terms. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd wants 20 per cent of Australia’s electricity to be generated from renewable sources by 2020. That’s a hard stretch for States, like mine, that don’t have hydro-electricity.

But South Australia will reach Kevin Rudd’s target by 2013, seven years ahead of schedule.

That’s why I’m adopting a much tougher, but achievable target.

This is an area where States can make a difference.

When I was elected Premier in 2002, there was not one single wind turbine in operation in South Australia. Because we got off our backsides, we now have more wind power than all of the other Australian States and Territories put together.

We’re also leading in solar power, backed by a “feed-in tariff” designed to reward people who purchase solar panels by paying them more for green energy they feed back into the grid. More than 90 per cent of the geothermal energy development of Australia is being undertaken in my State.

Last Friday, Martin Ferguson and I were in the northern Flinders Ranges alongside a giant drilling rig that will bore down 4km below the earth’s surface to tap the energy potential of “hot rocks”.

This is especially exciting because hot rocks will produce base load, emission-free energy without the variability issues inherent in wind and solar.

We’re also exploring wave power, and the production of a form of bio-diesel from algae that feed on saline water, CO2 and sunlight.

We have these ingredients in abundance.

We have announced a multi-million dollar Renewable Energy Fund in order to help build a sustainable industry to underpin our renewables push.

It will foster investment in research and development, examine opportunities for manufacturing, and help assess how to develop a green grid.

We were also the first State to pass a greenhouse gas reduction law, which sets targets but also allows us to enter into sector agreements with industries to reduce emissions.

Groups as diverse as Local Government and the Property Council, the wine and concrete industries, and the Anglican Church have already agreed, with more to come.

We didn’t start out with the legislative approach to climate change. Our first move was education.

We put solar panels on the roofs of high-profile buildings like the Museum, Art Gallery, State Library and Parliament House (not enough heat or wind power there), and – later on – Adelaide Airport, with the biggest solar array in Australia to be installed on the roof of our new Royal Adelaide Showgrounds building at Wayville.

Very importantly, we’re installing solar panels on hundreds of our schools and integrating education about renewable energy and climate change into the curriculum.

School kids loving telling me, and their parents, how much solar power their “school power stations” are producing.

In addition, we’re planting three million trees in a series of urban forests throughout Adelaide.

As a Government, we’re putting our money where our mouth is.

State Governments are big buyers of power.

When we announced we were purchasing 20 per cent of our power – for government departments, hospitals and schools - from renewables, other States followed or were placed under pressure to do so.

We’ve now decided to go further.

We will lift the renewable power buy of departments to 50 per cent by 2014, and then keep ramping it up until all our power for Government buildings comes from renewables.

Other States are also doing good things, and we’re now in the process of sharing ideas, not only with each other, but through a network of states, provinces and regions around the world.

This is being done through the London-based Climate Group that will host a special session in Copenhagen in December, which I will chair.

Beating the global financial crisis is important.

But the pressure to deal with climate change means we must fight a war on two fronts.

That’s why yesterday’s vote was so disappointing.

Most commented

20 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      07:20am | 14/08/09

      That’s a good start.

      Now you should use your states vast reserves of uranium to begin an enrichment and nuclear power industry. That would open up export markets as well as providing carbon-free energy into the future.

    • pete says:

      08:07am | 14/08/09

      Mike Rann, where were you when we needed you?  I’m no greenie, just a very very disappointed voter who believed in the promise of leadership on this issue from the man who said it would be forthcoming.  It appears to me and others that strangely enough the S.S. ALP is rudderless on this issue (pardon the pun)  The whol legislation package that was rejected is rubbish and should have been rejected, it was not what was promised.

      I predict such a backlash on this issue that Labor will loose seats in the upper and lower houses and not to the Liberals, who i believe will also loose seats to the greens.

      This whole issue has been a con to gain office and then a sell out to vested interests.

      NOT HAPPY KEVIN

    • South Aussie says:

      08:16am | 14/08/09

      Excellent news about the solar,lets see legislation for all businesses to provide their own solar energy source and while you’re at it recycling water and water collection off the vast roofs of factories.Lets see no more wind power with it’s danger to wildlife and the environment and the blot it makes on beautiful landscapes which will affect our tourist industry..who comes to SA to see WindFarms?They come for the natural beauty, the growing food culture and our wonderful city and villages.Lets see more put into encouraging people t o use less power so we won’t even have to think about nuclear power stations.

    • iansand says:

      08:35am | 14/08/09

      Good.  Lots of little things will turn into one big thing - reduction of emissions and reduced consumption of non-renewable resources (and they are good things, even they can have no effect on climate change).

    • wattty says:

      10:18am | 14/08/09

      Why is it that I always get the impression I am reading the Greenpeace Rann rather than the Premier Rann.

      Could it be that Rann can’t divorce himself from Greenpeace policy?

      Just how many wind turbines will it take to produce 33% of South Australia’s energy requirements considering even the manufacturers concede they only work at 40% capacity?

      How does Rann propose to feed the wind generated power into the grid or does he plan on having one in every backyard.?

      Please someone.Tell him he’s dreamin’.

    • Tom says:

      10:46am | 14/08/09

      Three million trees - how are you going to water them - by stealing water from NSW, QLD and Victoria no doubt ... Get Adelaide off the Murray River NOW

    • Bigpeteoz says:

      11:22am | 14/08/09

      Mr Rann
      If you are doing so much to combat supposed “climate change”, then the vote was correct. If you are voluntarily, without expenditure to your constituents, reducing emissions above and beyond that which you feel is required, then there is no need for an ETS or a CPRS.

    • Dug says:

      11:25am | 14/08/09

      What? 18 months ago ice caps were melting, polare bears were dying and see levels rising? Seriously that is the biggest bull in history. What now of the subjects you describe? Sea levels are not rising, polar caps freezing over and they world hasn’t warmed since 2001. So you like the rest of your political point scoring mates should check the facts and save yourself some time writing these horrid articles until facts have been checked and proven. Or are you asking your electorate to once again “trust” you to make the hard decision about our state. So like many others have tried to answer, why is it that CO2 emissions are rising, yet the world has not warmed since 2001? Final point what is the point of you doing what you are doing when it will make absolutley not difference to so called world emissions? Oh and i love how you reference Gore, Stern and Garnaut who are what? Scientists NO. Geologists NO. People who actually have an idea on climate NO. Ex vice president, and economists who clearly are “experts” in predicting the weather.

    • dave wilson says:

      11:27am | 14/08/09

      Mike it sounds great but I can’t see it happening. You, Labor and the States have no track record for tackling serious environmental or economic disasters as the collapse of the Murray Darling has shown us. If you couldn’t tackle an issue this size – climate change is way beyond you.

      Also, can you quote any CSIRO figures that show how many trees need to be planted in SA just to halt (not reverse) the increasing wave of salinity in SA? It’s more than 3 million isn’t it Mike – are you up to that task? I doubt that too.

      Not happy either Mike!

    • Jim Fletcher says:

      11:28am | 14/08/09

      As a concerned South Australian taxpayer, I am appalled that our taxes are being wasted on solar power and wind farm madness.
      This man is responsible for spendind $8m on a solar panel installation on the roof of the new Wayville pavilion, which, based on the published figures, gave a return of less than 1%. No doubt similar levels of returns would be applicable on some of his other fantacies.
      This madness is obviously catching - we see a supposedly solar powered bus travelling the streets of Abelaide proudly claiming to be the only one in the world (cost S1m) which if it is running on solar power has obviously solved transport problems for the world.
      We wear our stupidity for the world to see.

    • Bill Rutherford says:

      12:28pm | 14/08/09

      Hey, what’s the deal with Mike Rann blocking everyone on Twitter, who criticizes or disagrees with his Govt’s policies? Interesting that he is still happy to follow porn sites and scams.  Wouldn’t you think, with all the negative publicity that he has received , he would have blocked all those dodgy sites? But, ironically, he is more interested in just blocking those people who are straight-up and honest with, sometimes, negative feedback and criticisms. His actions, in this regard, contradict much of what he has written in this article about un-censored questions and “feedback being healthy in a democracy” and refusing to “employ a bouncer, or a censor, at (his) street corner meetings”. It would appear that Mr Rann can certainly “talk the talk” but does not actually “walk the walk” when it comes to welcoming all kinds of feedback from the general public.

    • Joe says:

      12:55pm | 14/08/09

      AGW is a con. Stop sending your state broke with these expensive and inefficient schemes that just give money to green parasites. The Labor states will just be broke sooner with this nonsense.

    • iansand says:

      01:11pm | 14/08/09

      Joe AGW may be a con, but surely reducing emissions and extending the availability of fossil fuels is a desirable outcome, regardless of that con?

      What do you see as the downside to initiatives such as this?

    • BBB of Melbourne says:

      02:01pm | 14/08/09

      I have trouble with a piece of writing that is essentially all about self-promotion.  Media Mike is a politician and his comments must be read through the “look at me” filter.  It’s great that re-newable energy targets are being met or exceeded, but Rann would never do anything reduce carbon emissions if it had a negative impact on the mining in his state as it would cause the local economy to nose dive.  Likewise, Rann is a former anti-nuclear campaigner in charge of a state with a massive uranium mine.  Dear oh dear, how principles get overlooked in the pursuit of power.  Good work on the one hand, but this article really must be taken with a grain of salt.

    • ANDIKA says:

      02:29pm | 14/08/09

      Why on Earth Mike did you have to start your article with this crap, ‘Eighteen months ago, the world was in peril.  Ice shelves were melting and sea levels rising as a future threat to our cities.’
      That’s just a bunch of crap and you know it.
      By starting off like this you really took the focus what is actually not a bad article.

    • steve says:

      04:41pm | 14/08/09

      Eds: please, please can you follow suit from Mike’s recent self-imposed ban on his blatant self-promotional ads (funded of course by us suckers out here in the real world) and ban him from The Punch as well.  After all the ads and media spots we’ve been subjected to, I can almost hear his tiresome voice reading out this column. Its making me nauseous.

      Vote [1]  No More Mike in the Media.

    • PJ says:

      04:47pm | 14/08/09

      Dear Premier,

      Why don’t you go public with your concerns about the Carbon Polution Reduction Scheme - the concerns that you raise behind closed doors at COAG meetings with the Federal Government?

      PJ

    • Steve B says:

      07:29pm | 14/08/09

      I used to be a believer in climate change, the media articles I’ve read, which in turn lead me to read some of the IPCC reports, all seemed to make sense.

      It was Mr Rudd’s government that set me straight and showed me that climate change is nothng to worry about and is in all probability a huge hoax.

      Think about it, many of these ‘catastrophic’ changes that are set to occur as a result of climate change will begin to happen within the lifetime of many of our politicians, the full brunt of this global disaster is apparently going to be felt by their (and our) children and the scope of the horrors that our grandchildren would feel has been likened to the apocolypse, with famine, disease and natural disasters on a scale not seen in recorded history. Truly frightening stuff indeed.

      The scientists however, have offered hope that our children may be saved from this nightmare if we were to cut our ‘Greenhouse’ emissions by 40% of 1990 levels, these cuts would be expensive and disruptive it’s true, but certainly achieveable if it was ‘necessary’.

      Mr Rudd’s plan therefore to cut emissions by 5%, with the POSSIBILITY of cutting up to 25% just goes to show that either:

      A. Mr Rudd & Co don’t actually believe in climate change (or don’t believe that cutting emissions would fix it) and are only setting up the CPRS in the hope of winning votes from those gullible people who do, or

      B. Mr Rudd & Co do believe in climate change, but are willing to sell out their own children’s futures (along with ours) just so they won’t upset the unions and the mining industry, which would cost them union support and possibly the next election.

      Call me naive, but I’ll sleep better at night believing that climate change is a hoax than I would if I thought our government really had that so little regard for their own children and all future generations of this planet that they would sell them out for another term in office.

    • watto says:

      12:38am | 16/08/09

      One issue you seem to run from Mike, is being transparent about how much money the nuclear industry and particularly the international nuclear waste dumping companies are ‘donating’ to your Labor campaign. Your day of election reckoning approaches - answers please!

    • Mark says:

      05:31am | 16/08/09

      I thought NSW had the first prize of a hopeless government. it appears that Labor is brain dead nationally.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

David Penberthy

@KevCorduroy @SallyHitchiner it's a great idea I doubt he'd go for it though far too laid back

ToryShepherd

. @mcguiremi is journo of the year! #samediaawards

ToryShepherd

.@mariamosco @msmarto Super Smarto. And Shirley Stott Despoja into the Hall of Fame #samediaawards

ToryShepherd

Best print journo to @mcguiremi woot! #samediaawards

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter