Here’s a heads up. If you really want to know what Aussies in 2010 think about our country becoming a republic just flip a coin.

America's favourite game show host Mr Guy Smiley

According to the odds, there’s a 50-50 chance of turning up the head of Queen Elizabeth.

Eleven years since a referendum was held to settle the republic debate, Australians seem just as divided about cutting their ties to a monarch living on the other side of the world.

As many of us prepare to kick back in the park or on the beach to celebrate our national day today, most Aussies are not ready to flush our country’s royal connections just yet.

This was backed up by a Galaxy Poll in News Limited newspapers yesterday that found 44 per cent were in favour of a republic, 27 per cent were opposed and 29 per cent were undecided.

Prince William’s three-day visit last week might have charmed the crowds who pressed the flesh to catch a glimpse of royalty, but it didn’t resolve the debate.

Reader comments to online news sites over the past week revealed many people were cautious about change and didn’t think becoming a republic would necessarily improve their lives.

As Act Rationally commented on The Australian’s site: “Asking for a vote on a republic with a simple ‘yes/no’ criteria is a bit like asking someone if they want to get married. It depends on who you will end up with for the rest of your life! I am not pro-monarchy at all, but this is one area where the status quo is just fine by me.”

Courier-Mail reader Hawkeye said he did not trust politicians to change our Constitution to accommodate a republic: “Last referendum, whilst in favour of a republic, I voted against it. Why? Because I do not trust our politicians to rewrite our Constitution. We have lost so many rights as citizens. To lose a swag more in one hit would be too much. And we will. And if you think the commoners will have any input you are dreaming.”
Andrew of The Hot Planet added: “If the Queen is given the boot, would we have to rename Queensland?”

Bugalugs saw no problem with Australia having a British-resident monarch, commenting on the Canberra Times site: “The monarchy is just that. Prince William has never pretended to be Australian. Nor does he profess to be an honorary Australian for the purpose of our national holiday. He is a representative of our Queen and has carried himself with the greatest of dignity and class. After all, we are all the Queen’s soldiers, aren’t we?”

On the other hand, Jim saw a future where we would no longer hang off the coat-tails of British royalty, commenting on The Australian’s site: “Eventually, Australia will become a republic. The monarchists are an obsolete legacy from this country’s foundation. With immigration and the racial and cultural mix this nation is going through, it will eventually discard its role as a sidekick nation and come into its own: a confident, independent Australia.”

Steven Turner of Melbourne, writing in to Adelaide Now, said there was nothing new in the arguments for a republic and was adamant who should not be head of state: “It’s the tired, old republican pollies who seem to need reinvigorating … The republicans have no new arguments to aid their cause. Perhaps neither does the monarchy. But spare us from a political (or ex-pollie) head of state!”

Whatever your view about going down the path towards a republic, it’s sure to remain a hot topic around the barbie this Australia Day.

7 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Dan says:

      06:54am | 26/01/10

      The republic referendum was the first thing I ever voted in, I was forced to vote “no” as the polies saw it as an oppertiunity to reinvent the wheel.
      I’m all in favour of a republic but i think the current system is adequate, the only “real” change needed would be for the governer/s general to stop represinting the queen and start representing Australia instead.

      Somehow I think I’ll be voting “no” again the next time….

    • iansand says:

      01:22pm | 26/01/10

      Oddly enough, the referendum against which you voted replicated the current system apart from the fact that the person appointed would be a President, not a Governor General and would not have any connection with the British monarch.  It seems that you were taken in by the utterly dishonest “politicians’ republic” campaign.

    • rob says:

      04:33pm | 26/01/10

      How will being a republic benefit the average australian? Will it put more wages in their pockets, will it reduce tax, will it improve our hospital system, will it make for more free education, will it increase pensions?

      I fear not!

      Then who is to benefit from changing to a republic at such an enormous cost?

      Oh silly me, of course it will be the politicians rewriting their own place in history - and we will pay the cost.

    • John Florence says:

      03:45am | 27/01/10

      Not only that, but the British currently pay for our Head of State. The Australian taxpayer doesn’t pay a thing.

      It is irritating that so many people have such a dislike for the monarchy. It’s almost like being linked to the British is suddenly embarrassing. Why? They are a great nation of people, who honestly would support Australia whatever decision they took. The anti-British feeling surrounding the monarchy is embarrassing, especially when you consider that not only are the vast majority descended from them, but they created this country and granted us independence without a fuss. We are a democratic nation already; we make our own laws. There is nothing bad about keeping the British connection. It is possible to be independent and retain the monarchy. We moan that the Head of State should be Australian; that they should be ‘one of us’. But if it wasn’t for Britain, we wouldn’t exist. And lets face it; is there any real difference between the average Briton and the average Australian? Yeah we get more sun, and are slightly friendlier as a nation, but other than that…Ii mean we have the same culture (basically), use the same language, and have the same heritage. We should grow up and realize that it doesn’t matter or hurt us to have a British head of state, and we should embrace the fact that we are so close as nations; instead of letting fervent, childish nationalism ruin our ties.

    • Brad Coward says:

      05:06pm | 26/01/10

      Why is this issue such a hot topic around Australia Day ?  Because lefty “journalists” like to stir the pot.  It’s the same rehash of the same tired old, overused rhetoric at the same time every year.  Nothing is achieved.  More division is the result.  If only “journalists” were as equally talented in writing about what unites rather than divides the nation….but that is just a bit too pie in the sky !

    • Senexx says:

      09:33am | 27/01/10

      It seems the main point of a Republic has been missed.  The point of a Republic is to have the people as sovereign.

    • H of SA says:

      04:19pm | 27/01/10

      Indeed, we will talk about it but we really need to see a model and a constitution.

      I can’t say I’m in favour of being a republic until I know precisely what would legally change in Australia. Change for the sake of change isn’t good enough for me - it has to be change I am convinced is better than the status quo.

      Perhaps thats what we need to be talking about - what an Australian republic would actually look like.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

OK, so am I the last person in Australia to see this Herald front page mockup thru the Rinehart lens? http://t.co/LSNBPkVl

Malcolm Farr

@awelder The flaw in your statement is the premise.

Paul Colgan

RT @mumbletwits: Our judgement is that ANZ will lift interest rates despite the RBA announcement, but only by about 0.06 per cent. #hindsightbrokers

Paul Colgan

Loving this photo of Arnie and Sly Stallone together in hospital for treatment. Great shot http://t.co/BD7FkF5e

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Would you kill for a job?

Would you kill for a job?

Who would work in an abattoir? Most of us have done jobs we didn’t want to do because we needed…

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Parenting. It’s the new oneupmanship. Ah, how quaint the days now seem when parents could raise…

Hipsters with hip replacements

Hipsters with hip replacements

Someone once told me that when people reach a certain age they begin dressing in the manner they did…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Punch on: Open thread 09/02/2012

marley says:

I'm one of the older ones, so I've certainly seen a few changes in my time. When I started school I learned to write with a nib pen, dipped in an inkwell (no, I'm not kidding). My mother became a dab hand at getting inkstains out of my clothes. Flicking ink at one another in the classroom was an essential… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

152 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter