There are some things that haven’t been ignored this election: babies, old Julia, new Julia, Kevin Rudd, Mark Latham, pretty much all past Labor leaders, maternity leave, Alexander Downer, John Hewson, Peter Costello, debates, the seat of Lindsay, asylum seekers in the seat of Lindsay.

Ah that's crap, I didn't say that. Picture: Ray Strange

You may have also noticed that, despite this campaign being anything but boring, it has also not been about many things. Here’s a few to ponder:

1. Childcare: The debate around childcare seems to have been sucked up by that of parental leave. But we shouldn’t forget that children will need somewhere to go when their parents go back to work and, short of running for the LNP in North Queensland, they may have to be put somewhere. Labor rolled out Kate Ellis to try and sell their broken promise on this earlier in the year. But despite the Government going back on their promise to build 260 new childcare centres, the Coalition haven’t talked much about it either except playing with the indexation of the rebate.

2. Indigenous policy: Well what’s new you say? Nobody ever much cares about indigenous policy? I don’t see you writing about indigenous policy so don’t be such a hypocrite you tell me. All true. But for a Government that came in and apologised to the stolen generation and made promises on closing the gap, they are strangely mute on this issue. This may be because it could involve using footage of Kevin Rudd doing something worthwhile. There’s also something called the intervention still going on which nobody much talks about anymore.

3. Carbon price: There was a chance that back at the beginning of this year there was going to be an election fought on this issue. Then there was a deal on a CPRS. But the Coalition then held their own little election on this point and Malcolm Turnbull was dumped. Now Tony Abbott says he’s not going near one and Julia Gillard just mumbles it under her breath when talking about stupid citizens’ assemblies:

Journalist: “Did you just say you would like a carbon price?”

Gillard: “No, I said ‘I really like basmati rice.’ This press conference is over.”


3. Foreign affairs/International relations: Has anyone heard about foreign policy this campaign that doesn’t include dumping the boat people in Timor or Nauru. Granted it’s not an issue that really matters for domestic votes, but with Keating, Howard and Rudd there was some discussion of Australia’s standing in the world with regards to foreign policy. You’d usually expect something on national security, Asian engagement or this little war in Afghanistan we’re currently in.

4. Internet filter: This is an odd issue. If you just hung around the internet all day you’d be excused for thinking that all you had to do was advocate the abolition of the proposed filter, the public quartering of Stephen Conroy and you’d win the election in a landslide. Most people however do have lives beyond their concern for internet freedom and frankly couldn’t care less; especially when its primary task is to stop child porn. Conroy was obviously concerned enough to announce pretty significant concessions to the filter prior to the campaign. Hockey said recently that the Coalition would dump the filter, but hasn’t made too much noise about it lest he be labeled a big soft freedom loving hippie. Which also indicates he realises this is pretty popular with a lot of the Coalition’s constituency.


5. Cost of living:
Remember how Kevin was going to help with the cost of living? Then he invented GroceryWatch and PetrolWatch? They were then massive dogs of policy and they both got scrapped? Well that may indicate why both parties are keen to distance themselves from the cost of living debate, because when you talk about it you are now implying you can do something about it.

6. Hospitals: For a while we were told this was an issue Kevin Rudd would stake his re-election on. Then we found out Kevin Rudd wasn’t to be re-elected. Now you hardly hear Julia Gillard talk about the monumental health deal that Kevin Rudd and Nicola Roxon struck. Maybe it’s because they realised that nobody understood what the hell Kevin Rudd and Nicola Roxon were talking about. Tony Abbott released a hospital plan of his own, but it was really pretty aspirational stuff, the same thing he used to slam Kevin Rudd for.

7. Housing affordability: Despite the fact Wayne Swan and Joe Hockey are continually comparing the size of each others interest and inflation rates, there seems to be an incongruity between the concern about housing affordability amongst voters and how often it is discussed in this campaign. Housing affordability was mentioned in passing during the treasurers debate, but there’s been no discussion of the usefulness of doing anything with market mechanisms like the first home owners grant.

8. The homeless and socially disadvantaged
: In the lead up to the last election and during his first term of Government Kevin Rudd made homelessness a personal crusade of his. Now any discussion of the homeless and socially disadvantaged has completely disappeared from the campaign. And what about the poor and uneducated people who are euphemistically referred to as “lower socio-economic groups”?  As an editorial in The Australian pointed out yesterday “entrenched intergenerational, social and economic problems in indigenous communities and other welfare-dependent sections of society have been largely ignored in this election.”

Anyway this is just a eight, what do you think?

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

147 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • dead to me says:

      07:03am | 11/08/10

      Hey guys two points:

      1) http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/anger-over-lack-of-medical-internships-20100809-11u65.html
      Thanks to this government we finally have for the 1st time in this country unemployed doctors in a system that needs them, look out local grads you’re next. Wonderful job roxon, bravo.

      2) One issue I would like to see addressed is the insulation debacle, people died, why no government apologies (Mr Garrett aren’t you a fan of saying sorry?) and compensation. PM please address this issue in detail.

      Thank you!

    • Pieman says:

      08:29am | 11/08/10

      Come on, dtm, you can’t be serious.  You are saying that the Government that has been in power for the past TWO years is responsible.  Your hero, Tony Abbott, bears a lot more of the blame for this one.

    • The Scarlet Pimpernel says:

      08:34am | 11/08/10

      ‘‘About 115 international students, who each paid more than $200,000 for their degrees, were told yesterday they would have to wait until Friday for final offers but there was little chance they would be employed, forcing many of them to return home’‘

      Um, so? I thought that was the whole idea - we train doctors from poorer countries allowing them to return home to provide much-needed services. Besides, does buying a degree instantly guarantee permanent residency? I certainly hope not.

      If we have a shortage of doctors in Australia, perhaps we need to reserve more of our medical school places for Australians.

    • John says:

      10:04am | 11/08/10

      The problem is that in the next few years Australian medical grads won’t have jobs, this is the beginning of a very big problem. Also Minister Roxon was very aware of all this, and had promised to fix the problem. But I guess she underestimated the issue. Blaming the Howard era government is pointless when Minister Roxon was well aware of this issue and should have started trying to fix it from day 1, as far as I know there is nothing being done to resolve this, the problem is being ignored because it is too complex.

    • TracyS says:

      12:47pm | 11/08/10

      In reply to The Scarlet Pimpernel - sending international students home as fully qualified doctors is reasonable. The problem is that the full qualification requires 1 year internship in approved supervised practice. If we do not provide at least that 1 year of employment, then the students are not getting the full medical training that they have paid for - ie the job is left unfinished.
      The availability of supervised jobs is something that should have been taken into account before the medical schools offered to take the overseas students on for training.

    • MarK says:

      01:11pm | 11/08/10

      Pieman says:

        08:29am | 11/08/10

        Come on, dtm, you can’t be serious.  You are saying that the Government that has been in power for the past TWO years is responsible.  Your hero, Tony Abbott, bears a lot more of the blame for this one.


      Ahhh I see. So Labor did NOT save us from the GFC (lol) as they claim. It was all the previous government.

      Cool.

    • Rene Doherty says:

      07:37am | 11/08/10

      Good article.  Missed one thing - the policies of Greens in bed with Julia and Labor.  How will they affect the economy (poorly); standard of living (badly) and industrial advancement.  Re childcare - single Mums, find work, cannot do it, no Childcare Center will take children, due to Government slowness in payments.  Indigenous, maybe do not know how to fix same?  Carbon - vital as electricity costs, industry, supermarket & small business costs will soar. Tony mentioned this with his ideas re all of our foreign neighbors in this region.  Internet - can Labor produce it at their costing?  Have failed to do so despite promises.  Cost of living will soar if Labor gets in.  Other countries with huge stimulus and debt are in big trouble.  So will we be.  Coalition has a proven track record re economics.  Hospitals - Labor has failed to fix them and never will.  Housing affordability - under Labor at least, families will be ousted out or if can pay rent and repayments, will be on a starvation diet.  The homeless need shelter and the socially disabled are best taken care of by the Coalition.  They have an interest in the Mentally disabled but Labor’s interest firstly is in Workers - pay them more at the expense of the rest of us.  Please can someone spell all this out?

    • James Parolo says:

      02:24pm | 11/08/10

      In regards to the NBN (broadband network) Labour is currently on track within the time frame specified and within the budget for it, also the $43bn price tag was before telstra agreed to cooperate with the government so the cost will be much less than that and just because the lib’s have a better track record does not mean that Labor can’t get the job done.

    • LC says:

      05:15pm | 11/08/10

      The key difference here is that the greens have been the most outspoken party against net filtering in federal parliament and that alone secures them my vote, the young vote and the IT vote (not to mention they’ve called for an immediate senate inquiry for the very hush-hush data retention plans).

    • Dave says:

      10:00am | 12/08/10

      We need the Greens now more than ever. With Abbott a climate change denier, taking the rest of the Libs with him (whether they like it or not), and Jules and Labor being complete wussies on the issue, the Greens are the only major party that stood up for Planet Earth.

      Sorry if that sounds like tree huggging hippy nonsense, but 3 years ago everyone was with me on this. I haven’t forgotten about climate change, shame the rest of the nation has… the Greens get my vote for this alone.

    • Edward James says:

      07:39am | 11/08/10

      In the seat of Robertsonh the elephant in the room is the corruption allagations against Gosford City Council with a body count of five and published in full page ads in the local Peninsula News these asertions identify how Gosford City Council mislead the state coronor! After over ten yearsof very public allagations then the wrongful deaths, it is time political party members started to accept this is not going away anytime soon! Edward James 0243419140

    • Ed Balls says:

      11:49am | 11/08/10

      Plus Ed, Gosford Council has still to disclose the total amount lost from the GFC and Council’s investments in CDO’s

    • Rebecca says:

      08:01am | 11/08/10

      What about arts policy?  I haven’t seen anything which suggests either major party wants a vibrant and engaging cultural and arts scene.

    • Tails says:

      09:14am | 11/08/10

      Bwahahahahahahaha!!!!!

    • niave says:

      10:00am | 11/08/10

      In what form does an arts policy come in?  A picture?  A poem? Skit?

    • Steve says:

      10:22am | 11/08/10

      that is because they don’t care - sorry.  Might be that labor reckons that the arts community is in its pocket.

    • Joan says:

      08:04am | 11/08/10

      With regard to foreign affairs in less than 6 weeks Gillard has turned a respected Australia in Asian-Pacific region into a laughing stock.  And world-over the leaders are still scratching their head, in disbelief at the knifing of Rudd by Gillard who???? A respected Australia turned into laughing stock world -over by Gillard - it will take years to restore Australias reputation and Gillard definately not capable- who just rabbits on and on in her dull monotone, with the same lines, again and again.

    • Sherekahn says:

      10:45am | 11/08/10

      Joan, I keep tellin’ yuh!  The media, (ABC 7.30 report and The Australian Newspaper) killed off Kevin Rudd to 36% popularity in the POLLS.
      Along with, all the rich senior citizens squealing about their money in MINING SHARES.

      Australia did not have a reputation except for SOCIAL WELFARE for Boat People. 
      Witness Kevin Rudd’s lack of success at the Climate conference in Copenhagen.
      By the way, if you watch American PBS news on SBS, 4.30 pm to 5.30 pm you will see that they too have had to delay their hopes for a climate policy do to the Republicans blocking any progress, just like our LNP!
      As for Julia’s sensible feminine voice, perhaps you would prefer we had a “SARAH PALIN” type woman leading our country?

    • Chris L says:

      11:07am | 11/08/10

      Oh for the good old Howard days when Australia was known as America’s lap dog!

    • Lou says:

      12:54pm | 11/08/10

      Joan,really? Where do you get your info? Australia’s reputation was,and still is ridiculed under the turn the boats around policy, agreeing to use a non-UN member country for these Asylum seekers. More recently ,in Singapore,after mr Abbotts irresponsible comment ,“i find the Burqa confronting” and followed up with Liberal senator Bernadi saying he wanred to “ban the Burqa” comment , i had people asking me, is Australia still a racist country?

    • Joan says:

      02:30pm | 11/08/10

      Lou really? And where did you get your information- like minded friends perhaps?  Australia has always been an open-faced society if you have a problem with that - live somewhere where the burqa or other fits your life goals/style there are plenty of places in the world. If your friends think Australia is racist I really don’t care - just proves their ignorance. The Singapore you talk about - is that the one with quaint anti- gum laws, modesty laws, spitting,  etc?

    • acotrel says:

      08:17am | 12/08/10

      Gillard has turned a respected Australia in Asian-Pacific region into a laughing stock

      - And you are thinking of voting for Abbott?

    • Stewart Henstock says:

      08:07am | 11/08/10

      Give it time!
      I’m sure Julia will cover all these issues with new policies.
      She just needs a little more time to print out more monopoly money.

    • Nicole says:

      08:25am | 11/08/10

      @Stewart, you beat me to it. Those are my sentiments exactly. Yep Queen Jooolya will fix everything by just throwing more money around, but is running out of time. She needs to buy those votes quick smart. She’s doing it again today. I sense pure desperation. She’s finished and she knows it. I can’t wait to see the back of her.

    • The Badger says:

      09:58am | 11/08/10

      @ Nicole
      Keep hope alive Nicole.
      Have you seen the articles that describe the betting rush on Labor?
      You and your conservative mates will be waiting at least three years.

      Better get on Labor now, before Abbott self destructs on QANDA.

    • BobM says:

      11:19am | 11/08/10

      Badger, the betting rush is from the Unions trying desperately to back their girl, so she looks like a winner - and they’re spending the money rorted from the BER. Get real.

    • Nicole says:

      11:40am | 11/08/10

      Too late Badger, I backed Abbott weeks ago and got good odds (well my husband did) . Abbott’s going to romp this in so just admit we’re about to see the back end of the worst Government in Australian history. Once again the Libs will clean up the mess Labor have created and thank God for that.

    • The Badger says:

      11:46am | 11/08/10

      @bobm

      Yes, I do believe you are right, those dumb labor unionists are throwing their money away to make it look like Labor is ahead. Who needs money anyway. And when Labor loses and their bet if lost, it would have been worth it.

      With flawed logic like this, it is no wonder you are a conservative supporter and the only thing you have left regarding the outcome of this election is hope.

      Keep hope alive

    • Seano says:

      05:51pm | 11/08/10

      Speaking of monopoly money, exactly how many billion of uncosted promises is Abbott up to as of today? 27 billionish.

    • Rob r Charteris says:

      08:15am | 11/08/10

      While the media love giving Latham air, what about Fraser??? just imagine the howling that would cause. Oh that’s right! lets not put the truth in front of a good story.

    • Sherlock says:

      09:14am | 11/08/10

      Malcolm Fraser had a column in Monday’s Herald. Perhaps he’s not so prominent in the media because he’s not following the press pack around haranguing the PM.

      Mind you that doesn’t mean he’s not a goose as well.

    • Billy B says:

      02:59pm | 11/08/10

      Rob R Charteris -  I never liked Fraser at the best of times.  Thank goodness he hasn’t had too much to say of late.

    • TrueOz says:

      11:52pm | 11/08/10

      Goose - can that be measured? Or is it more like tool?

    • Pat says:

      08:26am | 11/08/10

      That goodness somebody has common sense. At last PLEASE ask the questions and if they are not answered ask and ask and ask again.
      I suggest another is to is when will there be a Royal Commission (not enquiry where there is no perjury consequences) into the market power of Woolworths and Coles and what is the increased cost to the economy and consumer (and unpaid wealth transfer from this market power to the profit of Woolwoths and Coles).

    • Andrew says:

      09:26am | 11/08/10

      The reason that Coles and Woolworths have such large shares of the market and are able to charge higher prices is because consumers are too lazy to shop anywhere else. The mechanism of competition only works when consumers are prepared to put their money where there mouth is and seek out a lower priced good from a competitor and purchase it, but in Australia everyone wants the convenience of shopping at Coles and Woolies but expects the government to do something about the premium that Coles and Woolies charge consumers for this convenience!

    • The Badger says:

      10:08am | 11/08/10

      Andrew,

      Can you point me at a competitor to Coles and Woolworths that is cheaper in West Australia or regional Australia? No you can’t

      The time, petrol and carbon you spend looking for a bargain will usually negates any savings you might get at another retailer. Especially when that cheaper alternative is several liters of petrol away

      I imagine you live in the city and have many retailers just down the bottom of the apartment block you live in.

      Lazy indeed

    • BobM says:

      10:23am | 11/08/10

      The people who whinge the loudest about Coles and Woolworths still shop there….

    • blocker roach says:

      10:59am | 11/08/10

      ask the toothless ACCC that watched over as WW and Coles dismantled Franklins…..during the magnificent lazy Howard years.

    • Sue says:

      11:04am | 11/08/10

      As a consumer - I shop at my local independent grocer….thats the only way to stop the duopoly of Coles/Woollies.  Dont expect government policy to fix your lazy shopping habits and the subsequent flowon effect.  The same applies to some of the other issues referred to in the article…individual responsibility needs to be put back at the forefront of community expectations to alleviate some of the pressures.

    • Andrew says:

      11:40am | 11/08/10

      @The Badger, if Coles and Woolies are cheaper than their competitors in Western Australia then why complain about their prices in the first place?

    • The Badger says:

      12:15pm | 11/08/10

      @ Andrew
      Pretty obvious really.
      Because compared to farm gate prices,  they are way overpriced and with no competition, they can stay that way.
      Same with the price of fish.
      2 or 3 fishing companies control all the fish in WA. They export the quality and charge locals 50% more for fish than you pay in the East.

      You would complain too.

    • Andrew says:

      01:07pm | 11/08/10

      You can’t really blame Coles and Woolies for exploiting the way the system works to the best of their ability. It sounds like your real gripe is against capitalism in general so why not just come out and say it.

    • The Badger says:

      03:08pm | 11/08/10

      @ Andrew,

      You are probably right, I was gonna complain about the banking monopoly next, but I realize you already have your hearing aid turned off.

    • Andrew says:

      04:38pm | 11/08/10

      I don’t have my hearing aid turned off. I’m perfectly happy to hear different opinions in a debate. I’m sure you have probably classified me as some right wing free market fundamentalist for daring to defend large corporations like Coles and Woolies. Perhaps suprisingly to you those aren’t my views at all. I think there are many valid points to be raised about the problems with the way economic activity is organised in a capitalist society. However I don’t think attacking the supermarkets or the banks is the right approach. All that the supermarkets and the banks are doing is taking advantage of the economic environment in which they operate. The real issue to debate here isn’t how evil, greedy etc they are but rather if there is a better way for economic activity to be administered. Communism failed so it seems that people are now happy to accept that free market capitalism is a perfect system by default. It’s not and the debate that is needed is a bit deeper than grinding an axe against firms that exploit their power in the marketplace to make obscene profits.

    • martin english says:

      04:48pm | 11/08/10

      #1 I used to complain about the Woolies and Coles market power
      #2 I very rarely drink at home so most of my booze is duty-free (and not bought from Woolies / Coles)
      #3 I shop for all other necessities (including computer media) at ALDIs

    • Dennis Argall says:

      08:39am | 11/08/10

      So far as medical intern places are concerned, it was interesting to read the detail. The core problem seems to be that they all want to be in Sydney… when the great medical challenges (except lease payments on the Lexus) are in the regions and smaller cities. Hypocritical shake hands with Hippocrates.

      More seriously, the absence of international relations debate is tragic. Gillard does appear to have a record of dealing with others on equal basis towards mutually acceptable outcomes.
      Abbott appears dangerously confrontational on almost every issue, domestic or foreign, and also wants to be able to speak loosely without commitment, the very opposite of decent international dealing. Having spent earlier decades in a foreign service career apprehensive about our capacity to become the South Africa (as was) of Asia, isolated in smug stupidity, the issue… The risk of becoming such is right back in the room with us again.

    • MelG says:

      09:11am | 11/08/10

      funny about that with the doctors, I live in rural sa (pop 12000 so not that small) where it takes between 6 and 8 weeks to get in to see a gp, I recently gave birth to a son and one the first things they did (within hours of him being born) was schedule his 6 week checkup because if they hadnt done that chances are he would be crawling before we could get in.

    • The Badger says:

      11:48am | 11/08/10

      @ MelG
      Do you have a hospital in your town?

    • Aussie Wazza says:

      08:41am | 11/08/10

      Vote how you like for what you want.

      It doesn’t matter. We will get what THEY want.

      All the promises will be ‘adjusted’ or become part of the ‘long term plan’ and in will come a bunch of decisions and laws that have not been mentioned.

      Like I always say ‘We have a choice between CANCER and LEPROSY’.

      We can pick between an apple and a kick in the shins or an orange and a punch in the nose.

      We need referendums where the citizens can decide the course we want our country to take.

      Polies must be set straight. They are our REPRESENTATIVES NOT OUR MASTERS.

      How I hate party politics.

    • Homeowner says:

      08:49am | 11/08/10

      Housing affordability is a major issue.

      Having huge sums of money locked up in an asset that doesn’t produce income and merely rises along with all the others* does no-one any favours. The money is locked out of the economy (people can’t spend their wage on other things and keep business afloat).

      The situation where the average Sydney house price is out of reach of the average Sydney wage is a disgrace.

      * (ie if your house goes up by $200k in value then you can bet all similar houses rose by a similar value - or if you tried to add value by renovating then the costs of renovating hardly outweigh the gains)

    • The Scarlet Pimpernel says:

      09:21am | 11/08/10

      I’ve often wondered why neither party has looked at a solution to this. The idea of giving a first home owners’ grant was flawed from the start; it added to the problem if anything, since the net effect was to increase the price of housing. Vendors simply increased the sale price knowing buyers had access to those funds plus there was a natural movement upwards because of the sudden demand by people who only entered the market because they were using the taxpayers’ money in the form of the grant.

      A better solution all round would be to remove negative gearing whilst simultaneously announcing a one year only moratorium on capital gains tax. Many properties being rented out would be put on the market over the course of the year. Investors (who had already made some profit based through rent) would not lose since they’d be excused payment of 30% of the difference between purchase and sale. The obvious properties to sell would be those you had owned the longest. Homeowners might see some theoretical correction in the value of their property, but that wouldn’t really matter, since they wouldn’t be selling, the property would start increasing in value again and would continue to increase in value year on year. Few, if any, would be put in the situation where they have negative equity due to reduced value, since those most likely would be in the lower socio-economic areas, where there would be less investment properties for sale to depress the market.

      I may be missing something here, but I’d like to see one of the parties model the scenario to see what effect it had.

    • Joan says:

      10:02am | 11/08/10

      Absolutely right on this. The worst thing Rudd did for housing was handout $21,000 to first home buyers in a market already priced off the radar, and at a time when Reservere Bank reduced interest rates to near lowest ever. We now have this ludicrous situation where we have one guy bragging that he is about to buy his eleventh house while the guy next to him says he has been priced out of the market. Meanwhile more people on the streets as the guy with eleven houses asks for rents people can’t afford to service his debt. Too much money tied up in housing, less invested in money making industries.  Australia loses out in all ways.

    • Steve says:

      10:29am | 11/08/10

      As about 70% of households either own or are buying houses with an inflated price, the bulk of voters don’t want lower house prices, and will vote against any government that tries. 

      The 30% of households that want to buy at a lower price are out in the cold.
      A drop in house prices will almost certainly cause a change of government, any government.  The ALP ramping up of the home buyers grant was precisely to delay that.

      Also states and local governments don’t want lower house prices - reduces their revenues.

      Don’t expect any effective government action - ever.

    • Homeowner says:

      10:33am | 11/08/10

      Yes, the FHOG from both parties was useless. It allowed vendors to increase prices or buyers to bid up prices. A useless policy.

      Removing negative gearing on investment property or at least reducing the deductions to the income earned might be another good idea. Even if investors try to raise rents they can only get what the market is willing to pay. Considering there will be more houses on the market (not as good an ROI if negative gearing is reduced) there won’t be much room to increase rents.

      Another mechanism would be to encourage an increase in supply. More subdivisions, more land release, remove height restrictions to build higher density living. Pretty soon supply will equal demand. Plus, as said above, more houses on the market means a reduction in price, too.

      People treating their residential property as an asset are misguided. It’s only an asset for the bank as they charge interest and fees for the privilege of you living in it.

    • Richard says:

      01:50pm | 11/08/10

      A bubble is as a bubble does~ if anyone tries to tell you Australian housing isn’t in bubble, you can be certain that they are either:
      a) a real estate agent trying to convince you to buy now not later, or
      b) a property investor who wants to impress you with how rich he is (on paper).
      Well unfortunately for those people living in denial, the top of the market is already in. It peaked around April/May and has now run out of steam entirely. Although I support the coalition in the upcoming election, I do believe (purely with a view to the 2013 election) that this one might be a good one to lose. I suspect the momentum has swung in favour of Gillard now and she will get over the line this time, but it will end up proving to be a phyrric victory as a domestic housing collapse triggers an American style recession of our own right here in Aus, right after Swan & Co. spent all that time bragging about how clever they were that we avoided a recession and how the budget will be in surplus by 2013 fiat accompli, etc.

    • Homeowner says:

      03:37pm | 11/08/10

      Steve
      As more people are locked out of the property market your figures will change (I wouldn’t put it as high as 70% anyway). People will begin to vote for a government that is willing to reduce property prices or at least slow the growth so that wages/savings can catch up and enable people to get on the ladder.

      Richard
      While I said that property is expensive, I don’t believe it to be a bubble that will pop like the sharemarket does. For this to occur the following will need to happen:
      - massive unemployment will force people to default on their loans causing larger supply
      - people currently locked out of the market won’t be able to buy property due to unclear employment prospects
      - the supply of housing will need to be increased relative to what it is now
      - the population remains stable

      I doubt this will happen. We did avoid a recession and I don’t think anything experienced subsequent to this will be as severe. The budget deficit is only 6% so the government can go further into debt to stave off another recession, if necessary.

      At worst, I predict a stabilising in prices for a time. Which wouldn’t really be called a burst bubble.

    • Liz says:

      09:03am | 11/08/10

      Tony Abbott & Julie Bishop,  these issues in this article are the real issues Australia wants your policy and vision on.  Give us some positive vision and policy and show us what you stand for if you are elected.  How will you improve Australia? How will you get the economy moving again and return the budget to surplus? We want to hear what ACTION you would take in your first 180 days to address each of the issues in this article. These are the important issues that will shape Australia’s future and respect in the eyes of the world.

    • Geoff Drucker says:

      09:27am | 11/08/10

      Another issue to add to the list is government SUPPORT FOR INNOVATION.  Australia has one of the poorest track records among developed nations when it comes to supporting home-grown innovation.  So what happens is new ideas go offshore, create employment in another country and then we import the product or service back into Australia.  It makes no sense especially when we recognise that Australians are among the most innovative people in the world.

    • brenton says:

      09:28am | 11/08/10

      Until we have four year parliamentary terms, Australians will be served up with populist policy every three years.  In effect, we only every elect a two year government, as the government of the day spends one year - the last year - trying to get everything in order to get re-elected.  Even worse, it’s only one year of ‘action time’ for a new government, such as Rudd/Gillard, as they also spend their first year settling into their new roles and responsibilities.  I think Australia deserves to have a referendum on four year parliamentary terms.  Only then can governments have enough time to implement the hard, unpopular policies that sometimes cause necessary pain, before we see significant economic and social benefit (eg. GST by Howard).  Under the current system, no government will have the balls to progressively roll-back negative gearing, for example, which has artificially stimulated the housing market for years, and in turn increased the cost of living, whilst widening the gaps between mortgagees, with less disposable income and needing more hands-outs to get by, and renters who have higher disposable income and need less hand outs, but who will ultimately have less wealth for self-funded retirement…

    • Nigel says:

      11:32am | 11/08/10

      Rather than a referendum to get 4 year terms, how about getting a referendum on the Republic - remove the crown, remove the states, get 4 year terms all in one go and save the paperwork of doing it more than once. 
      THAT’S a nation building activity, it keeps a whole bunch of people employed in the short term while economy is running on mining only, but long term have a smaller government and cost less.

    • Richard says:

      02:19pm | 11/08/10

      Rubbish:- the longer the terms are, the longer governments will spend wasting money and entrenching corruption into the system, before turning around in election year, smiling sweetly and saying, “lets forget about all that stuff we did last term, lets move forward everybody. We have this great plan for a (insert expensive piece of infrastructure that’s not really THAT necessary but sounds cool) network, and even though it was part of our platform in the election 3 years ago and we’ve basically done stuff all for the whole time, except install one of our cronies into a plumb job and bully the other industry players around a bit, we promise we’ll do a better job than the other mob”.

      The longer governments are able to go without the trial-by-fire that constitutes an election, the more prone they will be to forgetting that they are not our masters, but in fact we are their real masters. They have to know that its not their job to make hard unpopular decisions, its their job use our money with prudence and common sense.

    • Bearbrass says:

      04:21pm | 11/08/10

      How much longer would Rudd’s hopeless, paralysed administration have lasted if we had fixed four-year terms?  No thanks.  Keep ‘em on a short leash I say.

      By the way, how does a fixed term work with the requirement for the government to command the support of a majority of the lower house of the parliament?  what happens if they lose a vote of no confidence, for instance? Would there be an election then?  Can someone clarify this for me?

    • Dash says:

      09:29am | 11/08/10

      1. Childcare - Labor promised “Cheaper better childcare” at the 07 election yet the price is set to rise some $30 a day in Sydney. And they also promised to build 200+ childcare facilities which have now been scrapped. Basically that was a lie.
      2. Indigenous policy - Rudd tried to write himself into the history books, but saying sorry did not improve the living standards of Aboriginals. Children are still being taken away from their parents for protection in Aboriginal communities (are they stolen?). Labor also during the 07 campaign, offered financial support for Aboriginal legal aid. This was never delivered. Basically a hollow promise.
      3. Foreign Affairs, Labors policy seems to consist of trying to win Rudd a position on the UN and Gillard announcing policies with East Timor that don’t exist. Carbon price = ETS backflip and inflationary increases in power costs.
      4. Internet filter = Labor censorship. A disgrace!
      5. Cost of living = Grocery choice -failure, Fuelwatch - failure, More affordable housing - failure, Cheaper better childcare - failure, “cheaper books for all Australians” - failure. Utility prices will go through the roof if Labor have their way on the price of carbon and the profits tax.
      6. Hospitals = Another election promise in 07 of “Public ownership by July 2009” - A big fat LIE! Now some of the states GST has been pillaged to the federal government in a funding sham almost as unconstitutional as the Whitlam Khemlani Loans scandal.
      7. housing affordability - as noted above at the 07 election Labor promised “More affordable Housing” - this was classic spin. Home prices continue to rise, interest rates continue to rise, inflation genie is out of the bottle and Labor’s policies of an ETS, and the additional cost on business of an extra 3% in super are going to put even more upwards pressure on prices. Labors immigration policy which has seen a doubling of both legals and illegals will increase demand and continue to push prices up. imigration numbers are at odds with what Gillard is saying about sustainability (anyone surprised by that?)
      8. there are more homeless on the streets than when Labor came to power in 07. Another hollow promise. In addition, the unemployment rate is higher than it was when Labor came to office. So much for better IR laws eh!

      Given Labors failures on these matters and now a new fresh set of promises, it’s no wonder they aren’t mentioning these during the campaign. After all we want to move forward right?

    • haggis says:

      11:20am | 11/08/10

      JULIA GILLARD wrote in a Socialist Forum leaflet, c 1985: “This cycle of expectation and disappointment is fuelled by the Labor Party often promising the world when in opposition, whether or not the promises can be upheld in government, and the lack of political experience with and education about the realities of government.”

      Socialist Forum declared itself far to the left of the Labor Party.

    • Dash says:

      11:42am | 11/08/10

      Haggis, and Gillard was still a memebr of the Socialist Forum right up until 2002. Not only ‘till she was 23 as she has said publicly. Yes it’s important that people judge this labor government on what it’s done, not on what it promises. Remember the lies and broken promises from 07! Don’t let Jooliya Fooliya!

    • Paul says:

      09:30am | 11/08/10

      The two speed economy is a major issue in QLD.  The economy here, particularly outside of Brisbane and the mining regions is in a terrible state, for worse than during the GFC.

    • fairsfair says:

      12:16pm | 11/08/10

      Couldn’t agree more Paul. This is ultimately what is driving the (what I think) rediculous call to divide out state into north and south. Rather than split us, we need to look at getting an even spread of revenue and investing in regional areas of Australia. Labor in QLD has caused some big big issues and that is one of my biggest fears in re-electing Federal labor. They share the same political ideologies and with Anna Bligh now taking on her new role as “Queen of Labor”, I am a tad worried about what that means for Australia. Australia, please look at what is happening in QLD and see if you really want the entire country to mirror the trends? We are the perfect example of unsustainable population growth and idiotic policy that aims to please the masses (which are predominantly in SEQ I might ad).  We also have the same opposition problem where the Coalition just can’t seem to communicate their ideas effectively and some how this horrendous labour cycle continues even though nobody you speak to voted for “Blight”......... How does this happen.

    • Macca says:

      09:31am | 11/08/10

      Am I the only one who sees 9 things in that list?

      Alternate Energy (Solar, Wind, Geothermal, Nuclear) is another thing that has been ignored.

      Industrial Relations has been fairly ignored. So far all we have is “I’m not going to do anything”. And apparently if you belong to a Union, that means you’re all going to lose your jobs.

      I’m sure there are other things but I’m not feeling too creative on this Wednesday

    • Stewart Henstock says:

      09:36am | 11/08/10

      As Tony Rrrrr Abbott said this morning:
      Labor policies are just sizzle and no sausage and i bet most of us like the smell of sizzling sausages on a barbie.
      But when it comes to eating the sausage many of us walk away with a sense of dissatisfaction and at times gas.

    • The Badger says:

      10:22am | 11/08/10

      If I follow what you are saying

      Enjoy the smell of the labor non sausage, but if you eat the Liberal real sausage you will get gas and indigestion?

    • TheRealDave says:

      11:46am | 11/08/10

      I went to a Liberal Sausage Sizzle.

      I saw signs all down the street saying ‘Free Sausage Sizzle’. I started watering a the mouth, nothing beats a snag cooked on the barbee, bit of buttered bread, bit of onion and a bit of dead horse on it. I pulled over and walked down eagerly. I saw people standing around, buttering bread, onions sizzling on the hotplate, people pumping on the sauce bottle. I lined up, got handed some bread, some onions dropped onto the bread and then directed to the sauce.

      ‘Where’s the snag?’ I asked.

      ‘Sorry, that was a non-core sausage’ was the reply.

      Damn Libs - got me again!

    • Catherine Chalker says:

      09:38am | 11/08/10

      What about helping carers who are socially and economically disadvantaged, and who are saving the government millions of dollars by providing “free” care.

    • Environ says:

      03:18pm | 12/08/10

      Best comment here. Carers are the “hidden army” in Australia. Not supported ENOUGH by government or society in general even though they save the government so much money. Especially with our ageing population, the parties should be outlining plans that will afford Carers and their families with much more support and be cared themselves.

    • Peter Leotta says:

      09:40am | 11/08/10

      On the issue of Health Services, I am seething with anger.

      Earlier this year at a public meeting, which attracted almost half the population of Gulgong, we were assured that there were no plans for the closure of Gulgong Hospital.

      In March, the then Prime Minister announced that there would be no hospital closures under a Labor government. Yet yesterday, two weeks before the Federal election, we received the news, albeit via the CEO of Greater Western Area Health Services, that Gulgong Hospital will close on August 29th.

      WE CANNOT AND MUST NOT LET THIS HAPPEN!

      The reasons given are as convincing as the Labor pledges made earlier this year. If, as was stated, it is a health issue, the hospital would have been evacuated immediately and not have to wait two weeks for its closure.

      I will make it my crusade to expose these duplicitous bastards to the wider community to show what scant regard they have for areas outside their voter base and that their promises and assurances are valueless.

      The money wasted on the overinflated and rorted BER quotes could have been better spent on other forms of infrastructure such as hospitals or roads.

      These hollow, phoney politicians can go on kissing babies and keep on reinventing themselves, but the wider public is becoming aware of their cunning tricks and lies.

      Under successive governments, but more so under the last 15 years rule by the Macquarie Street Mafia (NSW Labor), we have seen our health services reduced despite the growing population and the development of several new coal mines.

      This abject stupidity only reinforces the belief that people west of the sandstone curtain are only there to add to consolidated revenue.

      The community must seek an undertaking that under a coalition government Gulgong will get the health facilities that it needs and then do everything in its power to ensure they are elected.

    • Huh says:

      11:41am | 11/08/10

      You have a population of 2,500 and you want a hospital in your town? You are currently getting a HealthOne facility built in Gulgong.  If you need the hospital, Dubbo is less than 100 km down the track.
      What will you want next - an international airport?

    • James1 says:

      02:20pm | 11/08/10

      You could always move Peter.  Wny expect the amenities of the city when you live in the country?  You demand the right to live almost a thousand kilometers from anywhere and then complain that you are so far from all the vital things.  That seems a little unreasonable of you…

    • Todd says:

      08:33pm | 12/08/10

      There are 3 coal mines (Another 2 on their way) and a Magnetite mine all within 20 minutes of Gulgong. Gulgong needs an emergency department therefore only an MPS will suffice. What’s a HealthOne going to do??? It’s not like Paramedics can take people there lol. If I have a heart attack i’m not going to survive the 100km to dubbo what are you on about. Besides at least 4,500 people rely on Gulgong services - your figure is the town population. And Mudgee airport does us fine thank you.

    • BobM says:

      09:43am | 11/08/10

      If Labor wins the election, you won’t have to worry about any of the above - you will be too busy worrying about where your next meal is coming from. Give generously to the poor - because you’ll be one of them.

    • David says:

      09:45am | 11/08/10

      Disability services.  Labor, especially Labor’s Bill Shorten, keeps telling us Labor has done a wonderful job. Shorten has been labelled as some sort of messiah over this. The reality? Labor has done damn all. They have just shifted money around and made sure that they shave off a bit more each time they shift it.  Their disability policy is an absolute disgrace. The best they could manage was yet another inquiry by the Productivity Commission.
      Try mentioning it to the media and the media is not interested - after all it might suggest that Labor is not, after all, the social welfare party it claims to be.
      The mental health funding announcement by Abbott made barely a ripple although it was widely welcomed by those involved in the sector.  Labor actually pulled the plug on some essential funding within weeks of gaining office and nothing at all was said by the media in the last post-election euphoria.  Now there is even less money to be had in this area while billions get wasted on batts and halls and sending a massive contingent to a climate change conference.
      Time for a change I think.

    • Padma Menon says:

      09:51am | 11/08/10

      Right on the mark!  Homelessness and intergenerational issues are the biggies- and the zeal has died out as they take more than one political term to solve.  However these are the key sto improving the “quality of life” mantra that all sides are chanting- the preventative end of the social issues spectrum.  Who will have the courage to tackle them?

    • Holly says:

      10:03am | 11/08/10

      What does Tony Abbott stand for - who knows.  I suggest you all “google” Tony Abbott +Pauline Hanson and you will understand why I do not believe he will ever be a fit person to lead our country.  Some of you will either be to young to know of Tony’s role in mounting this civil case, or have selectively erased it from your memory. 

      As for child care - people may remember the crash of ABC Learning.  I was very impressed by the way the government handled this - a large proportion of parents depended on these centres and without access to childcare these parents could have been ruined financially very quickly.

      The Howard government was totally in bed with Eddie Groves and ABC Learning to the extent that immediately he lost his seat, Larry Anthony who had been the responsible minister, became an ABC board member. 

      It was quite obvious even in the early stages that ABC was presenting a flawed business model and would eventually self destruct.  While operating they completely skewed the market - resulting in gross oversupply of places in some areas but leaving the community sector to struggle in areas of marginal sustainability. 

      I note that Tony Abbott has promised to look at the new regulatory and quality assurance mechanisms -  with a view to slackening the requirements.  That is how highly he values the youngest and most vulnerable in our community.

    • BobM says:

      10:27am | 11/08/10

      Try Googling Julia Gillard+Kevin Rudd. That should be good for a laugh, Holly.

    • Nicole says:

      11:19am | 11/08/10

      Meh Bob, just go straight to Youtube, type in Gillard and Rudd and get ready for a huge bellyache. Keeps you laughing for the whole day.

    • Ian Freely says:

      10:08am | 11/08/10

      You failed to mention industrial relations.  The Liberals haven’t said a word about their industrial relations policy and when asked about it they simply ignore the questions.

      Simply declaring WorkChoices as dead isn’t good enough when they haven’t released their IR policy.

    • bf says:

      11:59am | 11/08/10

      Hang on a bit.  Labor’s policy is law… and it was generally agreed that Labor’s legislation was Workchoices-lite - in other words, it was a watered down version of the Workchoices.  Don’t you remember the Unions hating it, but Rudd at least had the balls to stand up to them.
      Liberal policy is status quo (same) for the current Labor legislation, except with the possible change to dismissal for small business after 3 years.  In other words, there are no changes for the next 3 years.  I’m not sure what else you are expecting, Ian????

    • Ian Freely says:

      04:24pm | 11/08/10

      Nice try bf.

      The Liberals have no policy written down.  They have policies on everything else but still nothing about industrial relations.  And since Abbott was asked about his position on IR in front of a media scrum how can we be certain it’s gospel truth?

      They said nothing about WorkChoices at the 2004 election, now they’re hoping by saying nothing about it, they can slip their extreme IR agenda under the radar.

      What I want is to see a written industrial relations policy - not words and not a signed scrap of paper.

    • Zen says:

      05:36pm | 11/08/10

      @Freely,me too,me too

    • Alex Downs says:

      10:11am | 11/08/10

      I think there are 9 actually…

    • MobyBob says:

      10:16am | 11/08/10

      What about interest rates? The media and the Coalition spewed forth on interest rates during the last election. Now all we hear is a deafening silence.

    • bf says:

      11:55am | 11/08/10

      OK MobyBob… here’s how it works.  The more a government borrows from international markets/countries/superannuation funds etc, the less the private sector (banks) can borrow to lend to citizens and local businesses.  And what they can borrow become more expensive for them to borrow (ie. the bank is charged a higher rate themselves, as was the case during the GFC, when banks put up rates with the RBA increasing the cash rate).  As you know, banks will always protect their bottom line, so the more a government borrows, the more expensive money is to borrow for everyone.  By having little or no sovereign debt, the citizens and businesses have access to more (and cheaper) money via lower interest rates. SO, in conclusion, if our government was debt free, more, cheaper money is available to borrow.

    • Betelnut says:

      01:12pm | 11/08/10

      @bf “more, cheaper money is available to borrow”

      That is a good thing?

    • bf says:

      02:15pm | 11/08/10

      Betelnut… no, I’m not saying it’s a good thing… I don’t use credit cards, and just sold my house at the peak to get out of the mortgage rat-race… just answering the question from MobyBob.

    • Rosie says:

      10:25am | 11/08/10

      There was a small foreign policy announcement… Tony Abbott will scrap Australia’s bid for a seat on the UN Security Council in 2013-14. I know at least some people whose vote is swayed by this issue because they are so disillusioned by everything else.

    • The Scarlet Pimpernel says:

      10:44am | 11/08/10

      I missed that one; thanks. Damn good idea - I’ve yet to see what brown-nosing to the UN has brought to Australia except a flood of ‘‘refugees’’ (and their extended families after Labor hands the first one permanent residency status instead of a temporary visa)

    • Rosie No 1 says:

      11:44am | 11/08/10

      I see we have now two Rosies and this is not the original Rosie.

      2013 is a long time away in politics so anything can happen.

    • Overtaxed says:

      10:32am | 11/08/10

      I have 3 words for all pollies who want my vote -
      TAX FREE THESH-HOLD

    • KenG says:

      11:37am | 11/08/10

      I also have one, Overtaxed.  Maintenance payments, when are they going to be either worked out on Net pay (as opposed to the Gross pay) or will parents making payments ever be able to claim them or any items (ie: computers or Laptops for their children) on their tax returns.  As payments also contribute to the raising of children, as it stands at the moment, only the parent who has the children and works part time or full time can claim Part A or Part B of the tax deductions.

    • Fred says:

      10:38am | 11/08/10

      In the cybnical political diversion of the “stop the boats” campaign and the deceitful claims for more border protection from unarmed asylum seekers, and then the diversion of population projections blurred with failures in infra structure develiopment in the past, one relevant issue totally overlooked is the fact that we are a people of many cultures, languages and faiths which makes Australia so unique and that multiculturalism ( a term avoided by both major parties) is a positive asset in a global economy. Failure to promote harmony through community education about immigrant differences and asylum seekers is the a great failure of leadership in Howard’s decade and Rudd’s forshortened first term. Racism and ignorance remain a national challenge for forging a greater , stronger and smarter nation.

    • Alice says:

      10:48am | 11/08/10

      There’s been little or no attention given to rural issues either ... and just this week news that we’re going to allow the importation of foreign apples and pineapples. Australian consumers should call on politicians to ensure we support Australian-grown produce ... before it’s too late.

    • Mia says:

      10:39am | 11/08/10

      “especially when its primary task is to stop child porn.”

      The Internet Filter will NOT, I repeat, will NOT stop child porn!  This is just the emotional trigger that Conroy is using to have people agree with this filter.

      The bigger issue is of censorship!  That affects everyone, not just Net users.  There are many other subjects that Conroy wants to censor as well - things that are totally legal, but apparently, don’t meet with the religious morals of a selected few.

      Conroy intends to have the Censorship Board look at R classifications across many mediums - TV, games, Internet.

      I thought, as adults, WE got to choose what we wanted access too - as long as it is legal, we should not have someone else making that judgement for us.

    • Gerard says:

      06:33pm | 11/08/10

      Whether or not it will prevent the viewing of child porn is irrelevant. The purpose of Labor’s censorship scheme is to make certain information harder to find. This is the election issue that really matters, because if Conroy and the Red Barren get their way on this, we will be in no position to even monitor what else they are doing.

    • Rosie says:

      10:45am | 11/08/10

      Good article Leo - I am OK with most of the problems because with either party my life is comfortable, I have a house, car, private health, food on the table, wonderful family and friends who I have no doubt will be there for me always. We planned our retirement when we had the earning power.

      However, my concerns are the Indigenous people. Now I understand why John Howard personally apologised to the Indigenous people for the stolen generation but he wouldn’t apologise on behalf of the nation. It would have been a big thing to do. Kevin Rudd became PM and apologised for the nation but sadly didn’t follow it through. It should have been a priority for the Labor Govt. Talk is cheap! We are now obligated to follow through after that famous “nation’s apology” to the first nationals of this country with the problems they have always faced because of “white man” intervention.

      Foreign Affairs/International relations.

      Fiji is my birth country and I see it slipping away to Chinese dominance. After the 2006 coup it has become a dictatorship and Australia has just sat back and allowed the Frank Bainimarama’s military regime to cement itself.

      Internet filter - I feel it is the responsibility of parents to police what their children should and should not do and watch. I am not sure whether it’s possible or not to instal your own filter if you wish to do so. Parents should always be recognised and given credit for being responsibile for their children’s well being. It goes back to traditional values and I see it in Tony Abbott.

      Housing is a big big problem for me. It breaks my heart everytime I see people sleeping on the streets and could never understand how the problem still exists this country in the 21st century. We give out some much aid money to the 3rd World countries, take care of asylum seekers when they arrive on our shores but can’t take care of our homeless and socially disadvantaged. Thank God for the Salvos! Julia Gillard, an athesist wouldn’t know how the Salvos do what they do in the grace of God.!

    • neilmc says:

      10:55am | 11/08/10

      There’s a significant error on point 4.  “especially when its primary task is to stop child porn.”

      Senator Conroy says “child porn” an awful lot but only because he’s really struggled to get support for a mandatory filter that was always much broader than that.

      If you read everything from Labor on the policy and go through the senate debate in Hansard, you will find that it was always (and still is) far broader than child porn. Labor has retreated on the scope to an extent, but it still includes the mandatory blocking of legal and politically controversial material.

      The primary task of the filter is NOT to stop child porn. (and even if it was it doesn’t work as stated by the Catholic Schools Office IT manager yesterday and just about everyone else who knows what they are talking about)

    • David says:

      11:02am | 11/08/10

      I’m more excited to learn that JG likes Basmati rice.  At least that’s something she stands for.

    • DaS Energy says:

      12:09pm | 11/08/10

      Perish the thought,. there lots more things Julia likes, for instance   spinning porkies to obtain personal gain, being Prime Minister, increasing tax on miners,  filtering the internet,  having Kevin 07 promote her wonders,  having Anna Bligh praise her with comparisons, treating Tony Abbott as a fool,  is to name but some.

    • Anthony Meaney says:

      11:08am | 11/08/10

      What about the biggest issue being ignored lately, but an overwhelming number of Australians support? Thats right,Immigration levels and Sustainable Population Policy.I’m not talking about Asylum Boats,I’m talking about the level the government of the day allows to legally live in the country.The Greens have no population policy,Labor,according to Julia Gillard,doesn’t consider immigration levels as part of the Sustainable equation, and Tony Abbott ,after mentioning 170,000 immigrants to be the maximum allowed per year,fell back on the Asylum Seekers as his only mention re Population policy last sunday.
      The only Party having a fair dinkum Sustainable Population policy,70,000 immigrants per year,is the Dick Smith supported Stable Population Party of Australia.
      As Ms Gillard called the election a week before SPPA was to be registered,the Party name is not on the NSW Senate How To Vote ticket and is only running in NSW,trying a Nick Xenophon type campaign,with candidates Bourke and O’Connor vote Group T above the line.

      Don’t miss Dick Smith thursday night,ABC,in a program about a Sustainable Population for Australia

    • Shockadelic says:

      01:09pm | 15/08/10

      Childcare, carbon, cost of living, hospitals, housing affordability, the homeless and (indirectly) international relations are all subsets of ONE issue: population/immigration.
      Immigration is the sacred cow of contemporary politics, so don’t expect any of these ‘other’ issues to be dealt with, when the core issue underlying them all is non-negotiable.
      When you can’t discuss immigration, there’s no point discussing anything else.
      Labor don’t even have a specific policy on their website! There’s a brief mention hidden under ‘Skillls’ or something (with no estimated figures).
      Yes, both leaders mentioned it for about 2 seconds and then went back to ignoring it as usual.

    • Steve says:

      11:10am | 11/08/10

      How about education. Gillard’s making grand promises to schools but very little’s been said about her track record (other than the BER which gets all the attention). Remember that promise in the last election about new computers for schools? One for each student? I remember that one but our estemed education minister turned pm doesn’t seem to. I work with several high schools. One received a small amount of funding for enough computers to bring them up to a 1:2 computer to student ratio. The others are still waiting.
      And of course the my schools website. There was a lot of comment about that when it was put in place with concerns about how it would be used but that seems to be a forgotten issue now.

    • DaS Energy says:

      11:34am | 11/08/10

      Come one come all, our children our world needs you more than ever before, Global Waming threatens us all ,and the Labor Party has the balls to join with you and be counted.  Never has one man been so backed by the punter and the party to secure a job in the UN and the World left to burn.

    • Marnie says:

      11:38am | 11/08/10

      What about tertiary education? Funding for TAFE and Universities? Removal of compulsory student unionism? The exorbitant costs of textbooks, admin fees etc just to study and try to get ahead?

      I will vote for anyone who raises student allowances to the same payment amount as the dole. Its unbelievable that Newstart pays more than someone studying to get ahead in life!

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      08:14pm | 11/08/10

      Yep, free education to anyone to anyone who wants it. All you have to do is sign at 10 year contract with the government. The government get the pick of graduates and sub contracts the rest to the private sector for a profit, much like employment agencies do. Need a doctor in the outback? Send a contracted graduate doctor. Price of Lawyers too high? The government can undercut the private sector.

    • S says:

      11:42am | 11/08/10

      Internet filter is dead, thankfully.

      And who the F would want a ETS? Just another Enormous Tax Scam

    • Gerard says:

      06:39pm | 11/08/10

      “Internet filter is dead, thankfully.”

      According to who? Last I heard, the Red Barren was as big a fan of the scheme as Rudd was. Yes, Joe Hockey said the coalition would oppose it in the Senate, but would you really trust someone from the Liberal party? What if the ALP gets a Senate majority or if whoever holds the balance of power agrees to it? This policy is still a major threat, and will continue to be as long as the ALP and Liberal have a stranglehold on Canberra.

    • Ben81 says:

      01:58am | 12/08/10

      Garard - “Yes, Joe Hockey said the coalition would oppose it in the Senate, but would you really trust someone from the Liberal party?”
      ...yes.  It is a Labor policy forced on us by the Labor party, being trialled by the Labor party and being taken to the election by the Labor party (as quietly as they can get away with anyway), and if you want to hang the Liberal party for it for some ridiculous reason even though they have nothing to do with it and they are going to the election opposing it that’s your problem.

    • BobM says:

      11:46am | 11/08/10

      After reading these comments, you have to wonder how anyone would think the current government has done a good job over the last three years - and why anyone would still be voting for them. Apart from Badger and Rob R Charteris, (our indigenous brother), of course.

    • The Badger says:

      12:26pm | 11/08/10

      Follow the smart money Bob and stop flogging the dead horse that is the conservative party.

      Perhaps this time around in opposition, the conservatives will correct this dangerous lurch to the right and bring back someone like Turnbull who can engage the government in meaningful debate and together all parties can move this great country forward.

    • BobM says:

      04:39pm | 11/08/10

      Ah, The Badger, only Labor voters want Malcolm Turbull as the Liberal party leader.  ETS Mal, no way.

    • darryl says:

      12:06pm | 11/08/10

      If you look at the negative labor adds on TV the whole campaign is about what they pretend Tony has either said or may have done. NOT a work about their failures while they governed. That is the immediate period before the election where labor wasted money, badly administered projects and fails to meet their core commitments like Global warming, controlling prices and delivering for working families. One GP super clinic, a few day care centres and almost NO housing in the NT for Aboriginal people is no flash record. If I was the liberals I would just hammer home the fact they are rabble pretending to be competent.

    • The Badger says:

      12:49pm | 11/08/10

      “NOT a work about their failures”
      haha you said work - as in work choices

      “If I was the liberals I would just hammer home the fact they are rabble pretending to be competent”
      reading this, I’d say you was the liberals. The liberals (conservatives) have tried this, but it doesn’t work, because the electorate can see through the childish simplifications you employ.
      Don’t worry, you will have at least another 3 years to pick up your old conservative selves and come up with a strategy. Next time, try policy.

    • Ellis Wyatt says:

      12:07pm | 11/08/10

      Haven’t heard much about Defence policy yet and remember that we have troops on active service in Afghanistan, Timor-Leste and the Solomon Islands.  Australia also has substantial forward expenditure commitments for some serious defence equipment.  Labor’s Defence Minister Faulkner is retiring but no replacement has been proposed (a bit like Tanner in Finance). 

      I’d like to see Kerry O’Brien (or any other journalist) ask Ms Gillard a defence related question, such as “how many troops do we currently have deployed in Oruzgan province (and who is their commanding officer)?”; the sort of thing that probably gets the occasional mention at National Security Committee meetings.

    • bf says:

      12:28pm | 11/08/10

      Ask Julia’s security guard… he knows the answers to these questions.

    • Oz Ocker says:

      12:22pm | 11/08/10

      Another issue ignored by both factions of the “Laborals” is Medicare benefits. Though marketing themselves as pro-health, the ALP has cut Medicare benefits shifting more costs on the patient. Examples are cataract surgery and pathology—Labor cut 7% off path benefits so guess who picks up the tab? Labor is planning a big Medicare “review”—READ:Cuts—if it gets back. The coalition? Well Health shadow minister and recycled cop Peter Dutton is ducking the issue.
      So, get ready for the new policy of” SICKIES PAYS” regardless of which mob lies itself into office.

    • Neuraxis says:

      12:47pm | 11/08/10

      People really need to get clued up the internet filter is a BIG Issue its not just about tech heads and people who use computers its about basic freedom of speech! This filter will block RC content that’s not just child porn its anything to with topics the Government of the day chooses. Any website of a political nature that such as Youth’n'Asia, wiki leaks, information the government doesn’t want you to know about, There test filter even block information from the government website about the filter.

      And can you trust the next government not to start adding to this list of things that get blocked. Its about control of the media people not just stoping child porn. The internet is the last place where freedom of ideas/speech and more its currently not filtered, stopping that is like the police putting you in jail for talking about something your not suppose too. It also doesn’t solve the issue of child porn, why block the websites this doesn’t stop people who like that sort of thing from finding it else where and now you have nothing to prosecute them on because well they didn’t access it they only tried to go to a link that was blocked.

    • darryl says:

      01:50pm | 11/08/10

      The liberals have said that the filter is dead a non starter. This filter is   something Conroy, the Saudi Kings and , Kim Jong Il all advocate. Can you imagine the list that Conroy would submit. He is a dangerous man with an agenda. The old posts of labor policy and promises will not be accessible. Just have a look at the labor party site and see how labor modified and sanitised the Alan Jones/ Gillard conversation on 2GB. No further mention of her Socialist Past.  If this Filter gets the nod it will be hard to dislodge

    • Terry Wright says:

      12:48pm | 11/08/10

      The Alcohol and other Drugs (AOD) industry has been going berserk trying to get a political party to explain their current drug policies. Both Labor and the Libs have removed from their website their drug policies just prior to the election being called and are refusing to answer requests from all the major AOD groups. Actually, Tony Abbott responded to the The Alcohol and other Drugs Council of Australia (ADCA) via some hack who said Abbott and co. were too busy but did include 2 more paragraphs of non related, Liberal Party spin. Nothing from the ALP.

      I don’t think the public understand how important this issue really is. We spend $5-10 billion dollars per year trying to fight drug use with health costs also running into the billions. Illicit drugs has touched nearly every family in Australia in some way yet government policy to reduce drug use has never met their stated goals ever! In short, our drug policy has failed every year since we first had one but we do very little to change it except make penalties harsher. This is why, over 50% of all crime is now drug related.

      The only saving grace has been harm minimisation which keeps getting attacked by the Libs, CDP, Family First etc. who portray it as some dangerous social experiment. But it has been the only strategy in the last 50+ years to actually reduce drug related deaths, harm and use.

      In the last few months we have seen Mexico and The Czech Republic decriminalising small amounts of all drugs, more countries introducing prescription heroin programs, dozens of ex presidents calling on the legalisation of drugs, much of Latin America withdrawing from the US led “War on Drugs” and even the US declaring the “War on Drugs” as over. Then there’s The Vienna Declaration where major health groups around the world have demanded drug law reform worldwide and to stop prosecuting drug users. Global attitudes to the illicit drug issue are changing rapidly as the costs and the death toll are spinning out of control while research keeps telling us how misguided we have been.

      With Australia once leading the world in harm minimisation until Howard denied it was our official drug policy, it’s no wonder the AOL industry are asking for the drug policies of ALP and the Libs before the election. Hopefully the ALP and the Libs have realised that dishing out the usual “Tough on Drugs” rhetoric no longer cuts it in 2010 because the public can now check their scary claims and exaggerations that once were taken as facts. For once, political parties may have to produce evidence based polices like The Greens do or face the wrath of an informed electorate armed with the internet. That’s probably why they won’t announce any drug policy before the election..

    • Stavros says:

      02:19pm | 11/08/10

      You say market mechanisms like the ‘First Home Owners Grant’...what could you possibly mean by that??? It wasnt a ‘market mechanism’ - it was a Government subsidy that simply inflated house prices.

      The reason housing affordability isnt an issue is because people like you dont even understand how debt-dynamics work. Why dont you do some reading on speculative debt-fuelled asset bubbles before you start suggesting idiotic ways to fix the housing bubble.

      By the way, politicians arent touching housing affordability because they know there is a massive housing crash around the corner. Auction clearance rates and lending for housing have crashed this year and now we have rising vacancy rates…

    • Anthony Meaney says:

      03:00pm | 11/08/10

      Of course record immigration levels of 300,000 2 years ago, and 270,000 last year, means that demand is artificially higher than it should be ,on top of the NSW Labor government’s strangling land supply over the last 20 years to benefit their developer mates.

      Another issue in Sydney and Melbourne has been the 600,000 plus overseas students, studying “important"subjects such as hairdressing and hospitality,and rentals in these cities are also bubbling along,with many Australians no longer able to afford to live where they were born.

      As Stavros says, the bubble is about to burst.

    • SR says:

      02:41pm | 11/08/10

      I for one actually support secret mandatory internet censorship (the internet filter) proposed by Senator Conroy.

      It’s a sensible approach to allow every Australian access to content classified as MA15+, R18+ and X18+ without being pestered by “spams and scams” entering their portal.

      As for the good Senators proposal to secretly censor Refused Classification (RC) content, I can only assume that all content classified as G, PG, M, MA15+, R18+ and X18+ does not contain any of the following:

      a) promotion of matters of crime or violence
      b) promotion of proscribed drug use.
      c) instruction in the use of proscribed drugs
      d) any offensive depictions involving a person who appears to be under 18 years.

      e) offensive depictions of:-
      i) violence which are excessively frequent
      ii) violence which are very detailed
      iii) sexual violence – to the least degree (including consensual fetishes)
      iv) activity accompanied by practices
      v) fantasies

      f) promotion of paedophile activity

      Good on you Senator. You are doing everything you can to protect childr……, sorry I mean the media, motion picture and phonographic industries. My votes will be going to the Secular Party and the Greens.

    • Tracker says:

      03:30pm | 11/08/10

      So how is a filter going to stop any of the above when for $14.99 a month you can have an offshore VPN ?

    • SR says:

      04:42pm | 11/08/10

      @ Tracker

      There is a saying going around…...

      “No ABN, no VPN!”

      If the government is actually committed to meeting its policies (all its policies regarding the NBN, secret mandatory censorship and the digital economy) why would they leave regulatory ‘gaps’ in the NBN?

      Conroy has stated that refused classification content is “the worst of the worst”, however that is far from the truth. Most content that is deemed RC is actually pretty ‘grey’ in comparison to a lot of content that has been classified MA15+, R18+ and X18+.

      In fact no content deemed to be refused classification by the classification board is illegal by default for any individual that has viewed or possess it.

      Refused classification content is only illegal if such content is proscribed to be such within the Criminal Code/Crimes Act etc, or if a person is distributing such content to the public via market mechanisms.

    • martin says:

      04:03pm | 11/08/10

      We need to get rid of both parties. Vote for the Stable Population Party in the senate. After this election we can vote for them in the lower house as well.

    • Carl Gene Fordham says:

      04:52pm | 11/08/10

      Don’t forget same-sex marriage. I find it hilarious how during the whole two times it was raised on ABC’s Q&A, both times it was quickly swept aside to make way for something else that has been discussed in mainstream media a hundred times.

    • Against the Man says:

      06:02pm | 11/08/10

      How about this issue: How did Gillard become PM? Why isn’t Rudd the PM? I think the answers to these questions will tell us about the ‘real’ Gillard.

    • GAMUT says:

      06:20pm | 11/08/10

      ANOTHER ISSUE IGNORED How to make life easier for families that may have unwell mothers
      YES we can give credit to single people for what they contribute eg the kind bachelor uncle BUT these people can also lose TOUCH becaue they so very often apart from visits to neices /nephews live at times in the very adult world!
      Families who have children become sensitive to others because they go through the GAMUT of childhood illnesses and traumas
      This is something MS GILLARD has NOT EVER experienced simply because she is not a parent!
      so she may state she is so understanding yes in theory but she Gillard has no real practise at raising a child and raising even one child is sheer hard work! ask any parent !
      It takes courage and sacrifice to have a child we hope Ms Gillard can so appreciate that every mother is special be they stay at home or noT
      see every family works we are so tired of the working family mantra that the ALP spouted ad nauseum
      if everyone chose childlessness there would be no future generation. Ms Gillard would do so well to appreciate this fact!

    • Carl Gene Fordham says:

      09:38pm | 11/08/10

      You might be more persuaded to open your mind if you read this article - http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/stories/s2980085.htm

      Childless couples contribute just as much to society as childful ones; there’s no need to get on a pedestal about your choice to reproduce.

    • Chris says:

      10:22pm | 11/08/10

      Housing Affordability:
      I long for the day when a government minister says, “Well, you know, housing prices are actually determined by market factors. Indeed, initiatives like the First Home Buyer grant actually defeat their own purpose by pushing prices further skyward. But, as long as you imbeciles keep demanding more government money, prices are going to go up all over the place. On the other hand, we can abolish the grant, you can have less money, and housing prices will come down. Gradually. Just not in your lifetime, or not enough to give you any relief.  I’m sorry, but I will not be taking questions. Good day to you all.”

    • Luke says:

      12:15am | 12/08/10

      This election is close and exciting…
      but make no mistake… its between a doche and a turd…
      which do you like best?

    • acotrel says:

      08:22am | 12/08/10

      ‘Once again the Libs will clean up the mess Labor have created and thank God for that.’

      I thank God the Libs weren’t in power when the GFC struck, we’d have probably had a revolution by now!

    • Fiat Lux says:

      09:31am | 12/08/10

      Another major issue that has been ignored is time zones . The Federal Government under the ‘‘Weights and Measures’’ act in the Federal Constitution should control the time zones but lets each State Government do that instead . In Queensland most people want Daylight Saving , the latest E Mail poll this year had 68,000 responses with 68%  in favour . The State ALP and LNP have said that , no matter how many people want it , Dayight Saving will never be introducted into Queensland . On the longest day of the year , where I live in Caloundra , it is broad daylight at 4.15 am and pitch black by 7pm . How stupid , how inefficient . I can never engage in an outdoor activity after work all year and the Federal Parties couldn’t care less . Sunshine State= State of Darkness . Turning lights on an hour later would save huge amounts of electricity but our clean green Government doesn’t care about that . No , I do not have an air conditioner .

    • AJ says:

      09:40am | 12/08/10

      Great article.

      Nos. 3, 4 and 7 are very important to me (especially No. 7) and it’s annoying that so much government policy and media coverage is being given to voter “concerns” about 5,000 or so boat people a year instead of that policy and coverage being directed towards far more important matters which are going to effect far more people.

      And while I understand it is not as important an issue as climate change policy, it would still be good to see more discussion about legalising same-sex marriage. Whenever Gillard has been asked, she simply repeats the same information about the Labor legislative amendments which obviously were beneficial to many, but changing legislation has little to do with people’s desire to celebrate their love with friends and family in the same way (and with the same “name”) as their heterosexual friends.

    • Scott H says:

      11:57am | 12/08/10

      The list is missing two elephants in the room:
      1)Government by, and for those with the deepest pockets. Until we get campaign donation money out of the elections, we’ll all be held hostage by those with the deepest pockets. The best (worst) Democracy money CAN buy. That goes for corporate AS WELL AS union donations.
      2)Accountability of political promises. Politicians of all categories, Left, Right and Far Out, promise anything at election time knowing full well they don’t intend to deliver if they get in power. We need some kind of impeachment process where we can throw the bums out when they do wrong or fail to keep promises. Expecting their colleagues or even the opposition to hold them accountable is just wishful thinking.

    • Ariel says:

      01:13pm | 12/08/10

      Baby elephants in many rooms
      Baby elephants in many rooms – hidden stories of silenced children
      Here’s an issue which is not talked about on the election trail.  In fact not much seems to be said about children at all – except for child care which is framed in terms of parents’ employment.

      Family law in Australia is not working for children at risk and in fact is often placing them in extremely unsafe situations. Suppression or ‘gag’ orders and the secretive nature of the Family Court is the reason why so few cases are reported in the media.  For this reason, the public does not know what’s really happening.  The “best interests of the child” is supposed to be the primary consideration in family law. The reality is very different. Family violence is not being dealt with in the right jurisdiction – the criminal courts - and this may lead to family court decisions placing children in serious jeopardy.  They have to live in situations where they are subject to emotional, psychological and often physical and sexual abuse.  After court rulings, they can be cruelly separated from their accustomed parent, home and extended family, without any preparation. If this is not child abuse, what is?

    • Ragnvald says:

      04:21pm | 12/08/10

      Yes Ariel you are absolutely right. The government’s own Reviews have shown that the Family Law Act and Shared Parenting are not working in the best interests of children and are leading to hundreds of children being placed with abusive parents. The consequences are that children are suffering extreme abuse and even death as a result of Court decisions, which give little, or no account of children’s needs, wishes, and rights. This is largely because Judges, Family Reporters, and lawyers are terrified of the extremists of the Father’s Rights groups, who are promoting the rights of violent abusive fathers and the laws are framed in their favour. The first politician to say s/he will reform the Family Law Act in favour of giving paramountcy to the needs, wishes, and rights of children will get my vote.

    • Alicia says:

      09:49pm | 12/08/10

      The family law system remains corrupt and is causing severe problems for vulnerable parents, and allowing children to be sexually abused by their own fathers, and are given custody of. The family law is harbouring these types, and allowing abuse of mothers and children, and there is now evidence of this and this is the result of Howard govt. Mr Abbott is opposed to changing family law and is listening to the greedy money hungary lawyers, social worker report writers, corrupt psychiatrists, and has turned and silenced abused children in th econtext of a lucrative money making industry, afterall these professionals make heaps of monies, and the govt generates heaps of tax. There is no support services and all clients and children are not allowed to speak about their suffering, it is bit like the old catho;ic priests abusing kids, except in family law courts, they control and abuse children and the media can be jailed for reporting this.

    • Trish says:

      05:18pm | 13/08/10

      Hey good article Leo, I keep asking myself “why is our broadband speed more important than hospitals, education, the elderly etc etc etc.

    • Jay says:

      04:37pm | 23/08/10

      Indigenous Affairs:How much money has been thrown at the problem in 30 years and we are still in the same boat.It seems to me intervention is the only policy that has worked.
      Carbon Tax:Biggest load of crap ever put forward.
      Internet filter:Let the purveyors of porn and violence have their way uncensored? I don’t think so.
      Education:Why do athletes get training at the AIS or VIS for nothing and yet everyone else has to pay HECS. Get rid of HECS as it would cost 2 billion dollars, when compared to money the Govt has blown on Pink Batts and education revolution it is miniscule.
      Childcare:Open it up to the market ie Private investment.Remember that concept?
      Government:Reduce the public payroll and downsize Govt.Sell of Australia Post,Medibank Private and give more to Private Enterprise.

      Housing affordability: Great point.Try and buy a house in Japan or China.We on the other hand open up our markets without a thought.
      Hospitals:Give it to the hospitals and sack the bureacrats.Half the money is spent on ‘crats.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Lucy Kippist

New post: Gina Rinehart earns $50m a day - but she's not the most interesting thing on BRW's List: http://t.co/ftrlKepj

Lucy Kippist

RT @BreakfastNews: Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook being sued for not sharing enough - http://t.co/gF8nSnLr

Anthony Sharwood

RT @gregprichard: The Victorian Sports Minister has just sent the New Zealand Prime Minister a commiserative email. #stateoforigin

Anthony Sharwood

@VanillathunderV fair comeback. But seriously, if that was a try then I'll book my skiing in Queensland this year

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Lying on a cold table in an unfamiliar place and undergoing a core biopsy was probably one of the most…

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

Red alert, ladies. Making jokes about your ability at work is not funny particularly at board level.…

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Punishing the baddies is only fun in the movies. In real life it’s messy, expensive, and fraught…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter