Articles like this one from the The New York Times explore a facet of life in India that most visitors from the West will surely notice, and anyone that lives here will have to confront to some degree – having servants, or “help”.

Ay, you missed a spot…

I still don’t even like writing or saying the word. A lot of that undoubtedly has to do with some kind of privileged-white-person, colonial-style guilt. Perhaps it is just something I am simply not used to, having grown up in a middle-class household in Australia.

Whatever reason you want to attach to it, generally speaking I feel uncomfortable with someone serving me unless they are working in a restaurant or a hotel for a decent wage.

This discomfort is one of the many ways in which I am different from upper-middle class and upper-class Indians – or even a lot of fellow expats, who seem to quite take to having help. It’s not uncommon for people that only live in a one bedroom flat in a big city to have a live-in servant who cooks and cleans for them – and sleeps in the lounge room.

Most everyone who can afford it will have someone who attends their house daily to clean (which I understand – you really do need to clean your floor nearly every day here, it’s so dusty) and, usually, do some cooking, washing or shopping. A lot of households will have a driver for each vehicle in the family, as well as at least one person to clean and do washing and one person to do the shopping and cooking.

This is often composed of a family – a man and his wife and any children – that live in the ‘servant’s quarters’ (read – single room) of the family home. The employer/family will usually pay for any children to go to school and for any necessary health care, and the employees will get one, perhaps two, holidays per year to go and see their family, who often live in some far-flung village.

Basically, the more money you have in India, the less you have to do yourself – if that’s the way you want it. At one of my friend’s houses, we can be hanging out in her room watching television and she will use the phone to call downstairs to get one of the staff to bring us up some water, or tea, or dessert, or even to call or go out to fetch whatever we wish. Call it luxury, or laziness, but money will get you an amazing standard of living here.

When I first moved to India I was working for a lowly-NGO salary and did not have to concern myself with household staff. I had a maid that came once per week to clean the floors and, much to the dismay or confusion of some people in my office, that was all that I would let her do. I told them I was perfectly capable of washing my own dishes and clothes and otherwise cleaning my house.

I quickly realised that my maid seemed to prefer it if I simply stayed out of her way and let her get on with it. So I would put my discomfort aside, let her in each Sunday morning and offer her a cup of tea or a cold drink, and then sit in bed reading. In my office, they did not follow the usual practice of having a boy to make tea, fetch lunches and do other small jobs. It never struck me as odd, or an imposition, that I had to get up and go to the kitchen to make my own cup of tea.

I have recently started working in a new office, however, and they do have a boy here who cleans the office each morning, makes everyone tea, will bring a bottle of water to your desk or cut up an apple for you. Heck, if you miss breakfast he will take 20 rupees and go and get you an omelet sandwich.

At first, I thought I would just accept my morning cup of chai and otherwise take care of myself. Then I started slipping….well, if Sanjay was going to get everyone else plates of Maggi noodles then he could grab me a diet coke as well. On the days I don’t bring lunch, Sanjay knows what all the cheap stalls around my office sell so I can ask him to go out and find me some rajma chawal or chhole kulcha. I step out of the office most times I want a snack, but sometimes the convenience is just too tempting.

I still can’t get completely comfortable or used to having someone around with a role like Sanjay’s. People in my office often comment when I make my own cup of tea, or go out to get lunch – “Sanjay will do that for you”. I say it’s fine, that I need to get outside, or that in Australia, most of us don’t have people to make us tea so I’m used to it.

But most of the Indian people I work with and interact with every day are university-educated and many have been overseas – so they know it’s not like this in other countries. So how do they try to explain it to me? Many simply don’t think about it - this is how things should be. Others tell me that it’s just the way it is, and shrug. Some explain that while we don’t have so many people in Australia, there are too many people in India so people need jobs like this, or whatever jobs they can get. Not that they, or their children, would ever do such a job.

In the end, I know I can’t change the way things are here – India is such a fundamentally unequal country in so many ways, I admit I wouldn’t even know where to begin. I certainly wouldn’t want to deprive Sanjay of a job, either. I feel much more comfortable now that I have managed, after two months, to get him to stop calling me “Ma’am” and to start calling me by my name, as we all call him. But it’s not like that is a benefit or really matters to him in any way.

In an ideal world, I would like him to be paid more, or perhaps have some kind of compulsory savings account (something like superannuation) so as he has some security later in life. As far as I can tell, people in these kind of roles will never get ahead because of a lack of education, or at least the kind of education that will help them get a better job that pays more. As for all the Sanjays of India, I’d like them all to be treated with more respect by the people that employ them.

And what do they want? I haven’t asked Sanjay, but my friend with a similar job in the last office I worked doesn’t want much – he wants enough money to feed and house his wife and two kids, to buy meat on special occasions, and for his son to learn English so as he can go to university one day and fulfill his ambition of becoming a Chartered Accountant.

To this end, he sacrifices a lot to get his son English tutoring – that his daughter does not receive. Like most parents, he just wants his children to have a better life than he has – and probably a life where someone calls them “Sir” or “Ma’am” instead of the other way around.

Most commented

42 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • acotrel says:

      06:38am | 21/01/12

      There are people in Australia who pine for that sort of life, but they don’t want the population problem !  Looking down on others is great , but downwards envy stinks !

    • jb says:

      06:52am | 21/01/12

      With all the poverty in the world and the multitude of refugees locked up in detention centers I think our borders should be opened to domestic help. Why should these people some of them fine upstanding citizens of their own countries be locked up when they could be out and about earning thier own keep work for an Australian family learning the language, our customs and way of life. They would be accepted into the community much quicker if we had actual contact with them. I say bring it on, domestic help at third world rates…

    • Paul M says:

      03:34pm | 21/01/12

      Refugees are not locked up in detetion centers. People who *claim* to be refugees are, until they can substantiate their claims. Doing this helps keep - for instance - agents of the Chinese government from freely wandering the streets in too many numbers.

    • Outraged says:

      11:45am | 22/01/12

      AMEN!

      Australians would be more accepting of immigrants/refugees if they came here, and you could pay them $3 bucks-an-hour to mow your law or clean your house…like the Americans do with the Mexicans.

      Everybody wins in this situation!

    • marley says:

      12:22pm | 22/01/12

      @Paul M.  - actually, it’s far more likely that the Chinese agents are wandering the streets than that they’re in detention.  Air arrivals who make refugees claims when their visas run out generally aren’t locked up.  And almost all Chinese asylum seekers arrive by air.  Maybe you need to rethink your argument.

    • Rose says:

      07:32am | 21/01/12

      Maybe instead of just wishing things were better you could assist by paying extra so that the daughter could get educated, or to set up a ‘Super’ fund, or to fund whatever they need that you can afford.
      You could ensure that you treat your servants with respect and insist that those around you, at least in your presence, do the same.
      Just drops in the ocean but they will help some.

    • acotrel says:

      05:25am | 22/01/12

      Bring back Workchoices, then half the population will be at your beck and call !

    • nihonin says:

      09:46am | 22/01/12

      Nah acotrel, leave the industrial relations system the way it is, I got a great laugh out of the QANTAS boss, taking the company out on strike, boy the Union and it’s members never saw that coming lol, plus all the ALP rusties complaining, when the IR rules used were those that were made to be bent. The government never acted as a ‘strike breaker’ and used them, as wait for it, “we didn’t know what the legal implications would be”,  that was A Grade British 70’s comedy GOLD.  They didn’t know the legal implications, my god, did they legislate them before they were fully looked at, seems so (has a familiar ring to it) made the whole stuff up, that much funnier.  Played at your own game, oh it sweet it was.

    • Robert Smissen of country SA says:

      05:10pm | 22/01/12

      That’s funny acotrel, under Workchoices more people had jobs & Oz was in surplus

    • ba'al says:

      07:38am | 21/01/12

      Thankyou for this honest article. I do kind of wish we could swap a couple of sanjays for the housing commission kids that keep throwing rocks at cars, houses, setting fire to bins and abusing the local homeless ladies.

    • Tom says:

      07:44am | 21/01/12

      Nothing to do with white or black if you have money you have servants in these countries. Same as in south america sri lanka or anywhere else. Good way to keep people off the street

    • Ian1 says:

      07:50am | 21/01/12

      To serve is an honour.  To graciously accept the service of others is to respect their intent.  I don’t see the problem in serving others, it’s a sure fire method of improving one’s life.  I don’t see the problem in having been served, it is in keeping with the comfort this life can afford.

      Are you going to give me a serve or would you like me to service you?

    • Master Bates says:

      09:08am | 21/01/12

      Methinks you have been watching too much Downton Abbey.

      PS - I’m innocent

    • TChong says:

      08:01am | 21/01/12

      “India is such a fundamentally unequal country…”
      Yep
      The caste system codifies and enforces this loathesome culture.( of inequality)
      While “caste “may be officially irrevalant, it is quite obvios that the practice still continues, because so many of the people like ,endorse and implement it.
      If the sysem didnt have popular support amongst the middle and upper   “classes”, then it wouldnt exist.

      I’m sure any one who identifies themselves as Indian, and reads Punch , is equally appalled at this practice, and would never have anything to do with it.
      And I hope they are also condeming this odios system of privelege and subservance.

    • Rose says:

      08:48am | 21/01/12

      Unfortunately privilege and oppression will probably always be with us. It doesn’t need to be that way, but the haves are unlikely to give up much of their power or privilege to to the have nots. It’s those of us in the middle that will make the real difference. Treat all with respect, pay a fair amount (which is not necessarily the same as the going rate) and offer assistance where you can to help those in need get a step up on the ladder. Encourage all those you know to do the same. Little by little we may not be able to change the world for everyone but we can make a huge difference to some, and that’s a good start!

    • marley says:

      09:04am | 21/01/12

      @TChong - while the caste system is undoubtedly odious, not all Indians are part of it. Muslims aren’t;  neither are Sikhs, Christians or Farsis.  And it’s slowly breaking down anyway among urban middle-class Hindus.  But you don’t wipe away 5000 years of cultural and religious tradition overnight:  that’s the reality.  It will take time.

      In any case, the issue of the caste system is only indirectly linked to the issue of service. Not all servants are from the lower castes:  many cooks and chefs are in fact Brahmins.

      And I don’t see how working as a cook or maid or teaboy or chowkidar is any different in principle to working as a junior accountant or junior military officer or as a sales assistant or waiter.  You still have to take orders from your employer or your superior, and provide service or services to the client.  There are very few people whose workplace doesn’t involve privilege and subservience of one kind or another.

    • TChong says:

      11:35am | 21/01/12

      marley
      Once again, you are correct, and once again I do generalise.
      Correct The “caste"system is mostly practiced by followers of Hinduism, though not all do, ofcourse.
      Like slavery, the caste system is a long held practice, going back to time uncounted, but like slavery , in any enlightened civilisation, it is an abhorrance, wich must be removed immediately , just like slavery.
      ( I know, I’m being idealistic, as it wont happen. Too much vestede interests.

    • Zaf says:

      11:36am | 21/01/12

      What Marley said.  People who work as servants do so because of economic necessity - and that doesn’t automatically mean a ‘low’ caste identity at all.

      Also, TChong - the past twenty years in India have seen the rise of political parties based on caste - not Brahmins (who only account for about 14% of India’s population), but Dalits, Scheduled Castes/Tribes and Other Backward Castes and Tribes. (I’m not being an ass, SC/T and OBC/T are terms used in the Indian Constitution when defining which social groups need affirmative action or quotas in education and public employment.) 

      This hasn’t solved the problems of a divided society, in fact some people say that it entrenches these divisions, but India is a complex, dynamic and fast changing society - what it isn’t is one dimensional.  Peace.

    • Morgana says:

      08:43am | 21/01/12

      I do not feel at all comfortable with the idea but on reflection, isn’t that what most parents in Australia do? We serve our families, all that washing cooking and ironing ect does not do itself. Admittedly the unpaid work we do is love job, it certainly is a different world to what we live in here.

    • Paul M says:

      03:35pm | 21/01/12

      In principle, you are also supposed to be teaching your kids how to do it. This is called “making the kids to chores rather than playing video games all day long”. True - many parents do not bother.

    • Anne71 says:

      12:36pm | 23/01/12

      Very true, @Paul M.  When I was a kid, my siblings and I all had our particular household chores which we were expected to do without being asked / nagged. If they weren’t done, then no pocket money was forthcoming. 

      While many parents of my aquaintance have a similar thing going on with their kids, there are still an awful lot who do everything for them. Many use the excuse that it’s easier to do it themselves than to take the time to teach their kids how to do it. All well and good, but if they don’t teach the kids basic life skills then who will?

      Still, I suppose it means that there will always be a market for “household staff” when these pampered little darlings grow up :/

    • AdamC says:

      08:46am | 21/01/12

      In developed Asia, it is common for middle class households employ domestic staff, though rarely on the scale of somewhere like India or Indonesia. They bring maids in from lower-income countries as guest workers; the staff then send remittances back to their families. This arrangement is obviously too sensible and mutually-beneficial for Australia, of course.

    • Gregg says:

      08:54am | 21/01/12

      Seems as though you need to get a better handle on life all around.
      For instance, with ” Basically, the more money you have in India, the less you have to do yourself – if that’s the way you want it. ” do you not think that extends to any country, like as in the rich and poor!
      The gap in India may be more vast or just more people at either extreme and then you have heard of the Indian caste system have you not!

      You do know that in addition to the office boys, maids and coolies, the line of descent goes down through the tasks such as cleaning of toilet pits, and no!, not a night pan but a little trap door at the end of a drop and the drops taker sweeps whatever out onto a tray, probably to dump in the nearest drain.
      And then there’s the untouchables, those manning the funeral pyres, perhaps untouchable for they can never apparently get the lingering smell from their bodies/clothes after having been employed for so long.

      So the nightmen are a thing of the past in Australia, but we still do have our funeral parlour, crematorium and cemetry staff and it is not so long ago that more companies had office boys more so than girls and tea ladies, there still possibly a few in existence and check out the bio of one editor who was a copy girl!

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      08:59am | 21/01/12

      Hi Tennille,

      Are we talking about the past or the present India?  I just have to say that watching some of those films like City Of Joy by the late Patrick Swayze still touches me.  And also gives me strange feeling that being servant with a total submission & in a such passive way is totally beyond my wildest dreams & imaginations. 

      I would really like to question the feeling of out most dedication & total subservience behind all this pattern of behavior without a single question in mind.

      It is seems backward & old fashioned, because no one in my family relied on a servant or a house keeper in their daily lives.  That is actually going back for more than 130 years or so. It goes every thing I believe in to have all this ridiculous class system where you do not have your own identity at all.

      Whether you would like to believe it or not, I truly believe that it is just slave labor with no dignity & minimum wages. Surely, we still have all that in Asian countries with little children working in sweat shops all day with their families for very long hours.  How about some showing some kind compassion for these people?  Serving people in some way does not make us servants at all.  However not in this demeaning & miserable way.  Kind regards to your editors.

    • Mitch says:

      09:56am | 21/01/12

      Typical white guilt. What would you prefer that Sanjey starve? If we still had the British Empire, pith helmets, safaris and asian/coloured help, then people in the third world would have jobs. The Left has a lot to answer for.

    • Zaf says:

      11:27am | 21/01/12

      Actually, Mitch, the British Empire was not about employment for the natives but profits for British companies.  That’s why the empire was so universally unpopular with the colonised peoples. 

      In India (the ‘Jewel In The Crown’) economic growth in the decades before Independence was less than 2% per year - population growth was greater than that, so the people were actually getting progressively POORER during the Raj.  The growth rate after Independence shortly doubled to just under 4% - where it remained stuck for years, but I think you get the point about the impact on social welfare of having Governments that are actually democratically answerable to the people as opposed to a dictatorial Empire.

      (In the “Mother Country” the loss of Empire resulted in a slow down in growth - after the post0War boom’s effects were gone Britain was much more economically anaemic than it had been when it was buoyed up by the Raj’s captive markets.)

      That said - domestic service is work, like any other work, and should be respected as work rather than used as a proxy for useless pomo colonialist guilt.

    • Mike says:

      04:53pm | 21/01/12

      I think that if you talk to a lot of Hong Kong Chinese, they will tell you that things were better when Britain had it, rather than now that China (thinks she) has it.

      Example, the bile and vitriol that Prof. Kong Qing-Dong recently spewed towards Hong Kong-ers in general was disgusting.  This is a fairly typical, spoiled brat attitude from China when she can’t get her own way and tell people how to do things (Tibet, Taiwan, Hong Kong) the way that she wants.

      You can see it at http://shanghaiist.com under Friday 20 January 2012.

      Would half of the countries that had been colonised or “ruled over” in part by Europeans (e.g. Vietnam, India, Kenya, USA) be better off today than if they had been left alone to themselves ?  Maybe, but most likely not.  At least they had things introduced to them that had not previously been there, like democracy, law and order.  What if Cricket had never been introduced to the rest of the world, or tea, or coffee and the baguette to Vietnam ?

      Just like when the Romans invaded Britain, when they left, they left behind roads, sanitation, baths etc. and the country in a lot better shape than when they first arrived.  I think that correspondingly, Britain left those countries in a lot better shape than they ever were, when they pulled out too.

    • Mike says:

      04:55pm | 21/01/12

      Pomo colonialist guilt ?!  Take a look at the slave owners in Southern USA…there is still a strong undercurrent running through those states towards people of colour.

      It is not confined to British people at all.  In fact, as pointed out here, most rich SE Asian families (Malay, Singaporean, Hong Kong) will have filipino maids and nannies, and these families are Asian, not rich expats.

    • Dave says:

      05:57pm | 21/01/12

      Ah, its always great when you can assume you will be the one giving the orders. But if its so great being a Sanjay-type why arent you over there volunteering to do that kind of work and be trapped in that kind of life? The Left had always fought to end these kind of wrongs. It has nothing to answer for. Now you can go back to your happy assumption that life is great for Sanjay and that you would love to live like that too.

    • jb says:

      10:39am | 21/01/12

      I agree Mitch, I would happily employ a livein from a poverty stricken country so they could send the money back to their families. Seriously I don’t see what is wrong with this at all.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      11:02am | 21/01/12

      No, No, No. The last thing Australia needs is to import more people. Inflates the housing bubble, adds more carbon emissions, puts more demand on scarce resources. Plus the fact that people who depend upon others to do their chores become lazy, soft and weak. Australia has enough of that spirit already thank you very much.

    • Anjuli says:

      11:07am | 21/01/12

      You don’t have to go to India , the British royal family are a prime example of having servants,by all accounts underpaid .

    • Zaf says:

      11:39am | 21/01/12

      Hi Tenille, I hope that you’re enjoying your time in Delhi (and that you’re taking the opportunity to learn Hindi!).

      [Like most parents, he just wants his children to have a better life than he has]

      You can help that happen, but not by wasting his time with little things like calling you something that you’re comfortable with but which he doesn’t care about. (As you note.)  How to be of practical help: make sure that you give him a good Diwali tip.

      As for educating his daughter - offer to pay for it if you can afford to. But don’t be surprised if he refuses your offer.

    • Dave says:

      12:29pm | 21/01/12

      I have quite a lot to do with wealthy Indian businessmen and you notice the effects of this type of thing. My view is that if you are exposed to this sort of thing for a long time it coarsens your view of everyone. Everyone you have to deal with becomes a servant or someone who can be paid to do whatever you want. I have heard Indian businessmen refer to their own senior lawyers (not Indians) as “my monkeys”  - and that wasnt a joke or an ironic comment in any way. That guy actually meant that those lawyers were his servants who would do whatever he said without question. Its the sort of attitude to workers that you see in Dubai. There is a short very slippery slide to regarding people as the help to get your sandwich and regarding people as workers who should be herded into barracks, deprived of their passports, and paid less than they had been told. If you have been around these sorts of people you will know what I am talking about. There is nothing wrong with service, but it should be on equal terms - contractor to client: not based on a servile mentality willing to accept all sorts of abuses and, on the other side, prepared to inflict abuses under the mistaken assumption that servants are mindless and can be treated any way they like. And this culture is damaging to the “employer” too. Look around at some of the business disasters in the west involving wealthy indian businessmen and you’ll probably find that a lot of them are the result of an Indian guy overtaken with megalomania and with no brakes on the way he interacts with others and no moral anchor in his relationships. The west has gone out of its way to rid itself of these attitudes and culture over centuries. Lets keep it that way.

    • Carz says:

      01:08pm | 21/01/12

      My Mum lived in Rabaul during the late 50s and early 60s, between the ages of 8 and 16 (you know, those years when you learn how to do a lot of things so you can be an independent adult a few years later). She and her family had many houseboys and other servants. There is a family story of my uncle, at the age of two, throwing his freshly cleaned shoes back at the houseboys and telling them to do them again (Said uncle is still in the midst of successful army career, having worked his way from private to captain, so obviously giving orders became a way of life). The simple fact is that my Mum came home at the age of 16 very spoiled and pampered and knowing how to do virtually nothing. She had few practical household skills, even down to cleaning and cooking more than just basic meals. While I understand that having servants is common for richer people in poor countries, and that being of service is frequently an economic necessity, I also think it is important for people, especially ex-pats who as in a country for a relatively short period of time, to remember that they still need to teach their children how to take care of a home.

    • Dan Webster says:

      04:37pm | 21/01/12

      Wealthy people could employ Indian servants to stay in India and clean the poorest peoples houses (if they have one). Plenty of feel good factor in that.
      Maybe they could just forget about a servant and sponsor a poor family. The only requirement of the poor family would be to pay it forward when they are no longer poor.

      But I feel it is more about wealthy people being lazy and feeling too important to sweep their own floors.

    • Louise says:

      06:56pm | 21/01/12

      My comment is that in India, as in many other countries, the use of the first name is most uncomfortable for people of all classes.  Correct forms of address are observed; particularly between employer and employee. Your are a guest in Sanjay’s country.  It may be that he would be more comfortable prefixing your first name…respect on all levels.

    • James In Footscray says:

      08:21pm | 21/01/12

      New apartments in Shanghai now have a room that looks like a cupboard built off the kitchen - it’s the servant’s room.

      How depressing is that.

    • Utopia Boy says:

      01:42pm | 22/01/12

      Here in Oman, the kind of servitude alluded to in the article is expected of the housemaids / drivers etc.
      Here, you can “order” a housemaid from the Phillipines and it will cost you around USD1000 per month. A maid from India around USD500 per month, and one from Africa (Zanzibar) between USD 200 per month!  You are required to house and feed the maid and return them home for holidays once a year, generally for two weeks. You, as the employer (slave owner) dictate how many days per week the “help” can have off. In the case of most western ex pat employers this would be one day a week. An Indian slave owner usually gives half day a week, and an Omani will give their maid one day off a month.
      I see everyday Omani women walking through supermarkets with their slave, telling them what to pull off the shelf while the maid struggles with the children and the trolley. My employees tell me stories of how they use their housemaids as sex toys. I shit you not one employee asked for a salary increase because he wanted a better “maid.”
      The most suicides in Oman are committed by housemaids. Often their employers (particularly Arabs) don’t pay them as per their “contract” and hold their passports “so they don’t cause trouble.” If they do cause “trouble” i.e wish to have a social life or shock horror - a relationship - they have been known to be beaten. You are allowed to do this because it says you can beat your slaves (and wives!) in the Quran.
      There are laws to “protect” immigrant workers including minimum wages, salaries and leave, but those pesky details are disregarded as a matter of course.
      Embassies and consulates here are ineffective because they are often understaffed (consider there is an Indian population in Oman of around 500000 people in Oman, most of whom are low level labourers and domestic workers) and are too busy enjoying the expat lifestyle to be bothered actually looking after their country’s citizens. I have been told a typical complaint to the embassy results in the embassy contacting the employer, asking a few questions, the allegations denied by the employer and the individual making the complaint then berated by the embassy for making up stories. It’s in the best interest of the embassy to maintain the status quo.
      Oman was one of the last counties to abolish slavery (1969 or 1971 from memory) but old habits die hard.
      And no, I don’t have a slave. I do have a part time maid who comes once a week, and she is almost useless - won’t take the rubbish to the bin, prefers to watch television than do her work, is very capable of burning clothes if asked to iron (not any more) and simply cannot think for herself. My wife has to repeatedly instruct her how to do things like how to rinse the mop after use, how to clean the stove top etc. She is Indian and works for me part time illegally at around USD5 per hour. It hardly seems worth the effort. And she was recommended!

      You do not want this situation in Australia.

    • Kate says:

      05:24pm | 22/01/12

      I find this extremely creepy and there’s no way I’d be comfortable with it. Not out of a sense of white guilt, but because it’s my house, my stuff and I don’t want some random person going through it.
      I wouldn’t want to see this introduced in Australia, but if there is no other form of employment available in India for people like Sanjay, then they should be able to continue in their role (hopefully with adequate benefits).

    • Utopia Boy says:

      07:45pm | 22/01/12

      @Kate,
      We’ve heard stories here of maids stealing jewellery and working with gangs to coordinate robberies (forgetting to lock the door when they go shopping etc). One friend even told me they found pubic hairs in the master bed, and found out the maid had been running a house of ill repute during the day while the employers were at work!
      The best one was when a maid, after several years working for the same family, decided to leave Oman and return to the Phillipines. The maid told her boss she’d like to bake a cake to take with her (travelling with foodstuffs is a non issue in these parts). On the way to the airport the maid realised she had forgotten the cake. There wasn’t enough time, even though the maid insisted they could return to the residence, pick up the cake and still make the plane. Due to labour laws, if the maid had missed the flight the employer is responsible for her visa over stay, so he told her to forget about the cake. The maid was distraught.
      A couple of days later the employer decided they might as well eat the cake, and promptly sliced through the layers only to strike some of his wife’s jewellery!

    • jim morris says:

      12:42pm | 23/01/12

      I recently helped my wife organise some pamphlets she was preparing for delivery. Whilst doing so I deduced that the local council was paying her one cent (a single cent) for each council magazine she delivered to a house.
      I was amazed so I spoke to a representative at the Noosa office and she seemed perfectly at ease about the rate of remuneration and assured me that people in particularly hilly areas could get up to 5 cents each delivery.
      Why focus on servetude in other countries when there is a slave-like subclass right under your nose.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@anderson_lainie He he. And congrats to Max!

ToryShepherd

@VictoriaPurman Then you should have included sex toys and yoga ;-)

Malcolm Farr

@Chritana01 No. NSW state

Daniel Piotrowski

@FreeDannyJovica Hi guys, I sent you a Facebook message. What's the latest on Danny Jovica?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter