It doesn’t matter if it’s making babies as a commercial surrogate or a10-year-old kid stitching together basketball shoes in Vietnam, exploitation in any commercial transaction is wrong and should be punished.
But you don’t ban basketball shoes. And I don’t understand why Australians have been banned from using commercial surrogates overseas.
Last year NSW passed its Surrogacy Act which, when it comes into effect, will make pursuing commercial surrogacy overseas a criminal act.
The new changes mean someone who goes overseas to use a paid surrogate will face a penalty of two years’ jail, an $110,000 fine when they return.
While paid surrogacy in NSW is already illegal prospective parents have always had the option to venture overseas.
Will it work? If you’ll excuse the pun, I think it’s a case of the government putting all of its eggs into the “too hard” basket.
During her push for the changes NSW Minister for Community Services, Linda Burney, said the laws are in place to prevent the commodification of women and children.
This is a noble aim.
The problem is the law doesn’t discriminate and makes no allowances for women who willingly want to become commercial surrogates. It just declares “you are all exploited” and that’s that.
But is it the case? In the US women who want to become commercial surrogates are given thorough screening including police and financial checks.
I would never assume to tell them they are exploited without knowing their individual situation, nor would I assume to say they weren’t exploited.
The same is true for what is becoming the powerhouse of paid surrogacy – India.
It is easy to claim Indian women in this developing nation are being exploited but the hard evidence coming out of the country is contradictory and vague.
But what about the children who are the product of this commercial arrangement?
It is the part of the whole argument which has given me pause, and almost stopped me from writing this - commercial surrogates are producing a product and that product is a child.
Of course there is a thin semantic line - technically they aren’t selling the children, they are selling the gestation of one.
And that creates a veritable Pandora’s Box of moral and ethical issues.
The government is naive to think it will ever stop couples who can’t have their own children exhausting all the alternatives, legal or otherwise.
The reality is banning surrogacy will never stop people from trying, but they will do it without declaring it, effectively turning to “cash- in- hand mums”.
In an interview with the ABC last year Professor Jenni Millbank, a Family law specialist from the Sydney University of Technology said hopeful parents had already indicated they would go ahead with overseas surrogacy secretly.
Criminalising something, such as alcohol, has never gotten rid of it entirely - it pushes it underground with sometimes fatal consequences.
When we are talking about the wellbeing of a child every effort should be made to ensure it is safe.
It is a tough balancing act to weigh the rights of a child with the rights of individuals to become parents.
It is not one that should be undertaken lightly, and it is a difficult and uncomfortable task.
But who is better qualified or more compelled to take on this task than the government?
Speaking on abortion former US president Bill Clinton said he thought it should be “safe, legal and rare”.
The same argument should be applied to commercial surrogacy.
Facebook Recommendations
Read all about it
Punch live
Up to the minute Twitter chatter
RT @gregprichard: The Victorian Sports Minister has just sent the New Zealand Prime Minister a commiserative email. #stateoforigin
@VanillathunderV fair comeback. But seriously, if that was a try then I'll book my skiing in Queensland this year
@BrettS69 the loveliest thing about post-origin is the sledges from gloating qlders #ratherbeagoodloserthanapoorwinner
That is the video referee howler to end all howlers to end all howlers to end all howlers to end all howlers #stateoforigin
Recent posts
The latest and greatest
Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer
Lying on a cold table in an unfamiliar place and undergoing a core biopsy was probably one of the most…
If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes
Red alert, ladies. Making jokes about your ability at work is not funny particularly at board level.…
Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.
Punishing the baddies is only fun in the movies. In real life it’s messy, expensive, and fraught…
Nosebleed Section
choice ringside rantings
From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments
Michael S says:
"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone
Change Up! says:
I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]Gentle jabs to the ribs
They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments
A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more
Most commented