TO a graffiti vandal, it’s the equivalent of a madman running through the Louvre with a knife at night slashing the Mona Lisa and other canvases. A secret squirt squad is systematically defacing illegal “artworks” daubed along Melbourne’s train lines by painting the letters “CTCV” over the top.

Victorian Graffiti: Who ever is behind CTCV has gone to war with Melbourne's street artists. Picture: Flickr

The anonymous vigilantes are bombarding hundreds of sites across the rail network with their simple tag, prompting cries of foul play from graffiti crews.

Outraged vandals have accused employees of train operator Connex, and also the transit police, of somehow orchestrating the blitz as some sort of bizarre “tit for tat” campaign to wipe out street art.

Internet forums are filled with wild theories about what CTCV stands for - with favoured suggestions including “Cops Trashing Crap Vandalism” or “Connex Taskforce Crushing Vandals”.

Victoria Police and Connex strongly deny any involvement in the “slashing” campaign. They point out that graffiti is a crime - even if it is only done Sara Lee style,  “layer upon layer upon layer” over the top of another miscreant’s existing mess.

Regardless of who is behind the mischievous CTCV spree, the bleatings from the “artists” behind much of the visual pollution that blankets our cities are revealing.

In the clandestine world of spray can art, tagging over another person’s work is considered a major insult. So the wide-reaching, systematic campaign to ruin many of the murals and works that have helped Melbourne earn a reputation as an international graffiti hub has seriously annoyed the “artists”.

“The CTCV shit has destroyed everything in Melbourne now. Really friggen pissed off,’’ one disgruntled art fan wrote on a message board. “This is annoying because there were some AWESOME pieces of work … and now they have all been destroyed. I want revenge,” said another.

Some have even grumbled that if CTCV is some sort of “black op” by police, Connex or the government, it’s a poor use of taxpayer dollars!

The graffiti vandals seem oblivious their bellyaches mirror those frequently leveled at them by those in the wider community who consider their modern-day cave paintings visual vomit.

Those four simple letters CTCV seems to have made the point far more effectively than any existing control measures: tagging looks awful, and it’s bloody annoying when someone scrawls all over something you own or like.

The serial daubers seem especially annoyed that there is little skill in CTCV’s efforts – just simple, neat characters sprayed in colors apparently chosen to most stand out against their illegal backdrop.

Incensed wall-writers, so used to being hunted themselves, are planning stings of their own to catch the unwanted additions to their ranks.

“They’re making good art work look SHIT, who ever it is needs to f**king stop with that bullsh*t. And if it is the cops, maybe we should try to get footage of them doing it, so then they can be punished,” railed one graffiti fan.

“Video surveillance will be your downfall, just wait. We are watching, waiting & planning,” warned another.

Of course, it’s entirely likely the CTCV tags are the work of one or more outlaw artists trying to make a name for themselves. It’s also possible the “slashings” are the work of a civilian like the famous New Orleans anti-graffiti vigilante Fred Radtke - aka the Grey Ghost.

Former marine Radtke runs around with a bucket of grey paint brushing over graffiti for what he’s dubbed “Operation Clean Sweep” - all with the blessing of the New Orleans Police Department.

The CTCV tags certainly haven’t made Melbourne any prettier. But given most citizens can barely understand the jumble of hieroglyphics the “artists” squirt on walls, a few extra unintelligible strokes are worth it for the pain it is obviously causing the vandals.

The wreckers won’t go down without a fight though, as this recent posting on an internet forum shows: “Well I’m happy to announce some new shit has popped up on my train line over the top of the toyed ones. Nice one whoever did it.” Your move, CTCV.

Most commented

23 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Dazzaaaaaaa says:

      08:38am | 07/09/09

      Not bad, if indeed it is Connex or the coppers.

    • erhjkl says:

      06:37pm | 23/01/10

      i hear it stands for   ” catching the city vandals ”

    • Steve S says:

      08:54am | 07/09/09

      If it’s causing some of these idiots anguish, all the better.  I’m convinced that if some politician ran for office on a platform of capital punishment for convicted graffiti vandals, they’d win hands down.  If that punishment seems a tad harsh then perhaps the various victims should be offered the opportunity to brand the perpetrators either by way of using a branding iron or some non-removable spray paint.  It is just a pointless crime, certainly not art and is purely a destructive act.  At least theft has some purpose to it.

    • Russell says:

      09:12am | 07/09/09

      Graffiti “artists” whinging about Graffiti, I thought I’d never see the day.

    • JD says:

      09:24am | 07/09/09

      As a former daily Connex traveller coming in via North Melbourne, if my mp3 was flat, or I didn’t have anything to read, at least I could stay occupied checking out the work of these guys. We’re not talking about some hastily scribbled tag here, we’re talking about quality.

      These images are very rarely offensive or vulgar, and many that I see along the railway yards are quite obviously the work of very talented artists. For those who claim otherwise, let’s see your best attempt at creativity. Being familiar with both the work and the area you’re referring too here, I have to question both the author and commentators alike, why the anger? Who is it hurting? It’s not like it’s on your car or on your house. It’s a brick wall along some dingy train line.

      Graffiti on trains which disrupts services, black texta scribbles and the other juvenile rubbish I can idenftify with your distaste, but this is a senseless destruction of someones hard work for malicous purposes. It’s the taking of something someone has worked hard for, and defacing it for the sake of upsetting them. Hardly a commendable act

    • Nicholas James says:

      10:17am | 07/09/09

      @JD - couldn’t agree more. I am all for street art and strongly believe that it has a positive effect on society in more ways than you, Fiona, seem to realise.

      Now I’m not talking about texta scribble, scratching into the back of bus seats or mindless vandalism - I’m talking about the true pieces of art that transform an ugly, constricting, oppressive concrete cemetery to all that is inspirational into something that provokes creativity, or at least a smile.

      “Visual pollution”? Visual pollution is defacing what was once a naturally beautiful amalgamation of God’s handiwork and stacking grey brick upon grey brick, spraying it grey, then leaving it rot and decay.

      I would be interested to find anyone who considers the top-quality pieces of urban street art as “visual vomit” as you so eloquently put it.

      “Modern-day cave paintings” -  they certainly are, thank you for affirming my point…

      What’s on your walls Fiona? Nothing I presume. I am sure you live in a den of pure functionality, drive a raw metal car and wear hardwearing hessian garb. Why not simply shave your head while you’re at it? Why undertake any aesthetically pleasing acts at all? Long live raw, robotic, de-humanised, functional social construction!

    • Tony says:

      10:52am | 07/09/09

      Art?  You have to be kidding, only the truly retarded would consider defacing a property as a talent.  As we see, even the disgruntled vandals will not put their name out there…fine indicator of the type of anti-social scum that they are.  Even more absurd, there are calls for CCTV assistance to catch the over tagger!  Whoever is throwing up CTCV, interesting concept….very interesting.

    • miles says:

      10:55am | 07/09/09

      the real vandalism here is the crap that gets built along rail-lines
      the big blank fences, featureless concrete walls and bland beige buildings that blight our landscape
      its okay for you tossers living in br-aa-ton and kew..darling.. but for the rest of us who want a bit of culture and art in our lives, we watch paint..and tv
      it is no accident that graffiti culture popped up in the midst of the roll out of that bastardised internationalist style across our infrastructure networks
      i hope someone catches those vandals

    • Steve S says:

      10:59am | 07/09/09

      Both JD and Nicholas James, I agree that there are genuinely clever artists out there armed with spray cans but unfortunately particularly in Sydney, they’re clearly outnumbered by mindless idiots and thugs who inflict wanton destruction not only on publicly owned buildings and property but also on residential dwellings and, in particular, on colour-bond fences.  People who spend their hard-earned on trying to beautify their surroundings should not have to be concerned about some selfish, ignorant bastard coming along and vandalising it.  Perhaps to distinguish between the artist and the vandal, councils etc should hire genuine artists to decorate the drab buildings, walls that back on to railway lines but at the same time, laws should be toughened up, greater efforts made to track down offenders and greater penalties meted out upon conviction.

    • Nicholas James says:

      11:11am | 07/09/09

      @Tony

      Forgive me for sinking to the level you set and partake in name-calling - but only the “truly retarded” or simple mided would not consider street art as art. Whether or not it is art is not what is being debated here, but rather this is a debate over whether or not street art is an expression that is socially acceptable. This is a debate I am happy to engage in.

      However, I do understand and in fact agree with your point of view that defacing property in itself is not a talent. However,creating such imagery, imagery that gives me - and no doubt many others - such visual pleasure is
      in fact a talent.

      I would recommend all readers to check out Banksy’s work (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banksy). He is one of my favourites…

      Actual look at his work, what it is and what he is trying to say and once you have deeper understanding come back and convince me - through statements that rise above name calling - that this artist (or more appropriately, activist) is “anti-social scum” that is creating “visual pollution/vomit” by his “modern-day cave paintings”.

      Good luck.

    • Tony says:

      01:16pm | 07/09/09

      Thank you Nicholas for pointing out a talented person who damages property with paint.  Yep, I have to agree that some of his stuff is quite clever but where is the talent of the anti-social scum that deface property around Sydney?  It may be called street art by some, we must keep in mind that art appreciation is a very subjective thing though.  Has anybody seen the work of Amal Laala?  Vomit as art with a bonus protest message…a bit bonkers.  Graffiti, anti-social…but call it street art if that makes you feel better.

    • Voxpop says:

      03:41pm | 07/09/09

      Artistic graffiti is stunning, provides social commentary and a strong sense of place and style as well as being a draw card for tourism.

      Having only been to Melbourne once briefly I don’t know locations but since seeing a book on graffiti in a bookshop I now know to go to Kings Way when I do get down there.  This book although I didn’t buy it was absolutely stunning with so many examples of art that would rival many found in galleries.  And Melbourne is recognised internationally for it’s quality graffiti.
      http://catalogue.mup.com.au/978-0-522-85660-6.html

      Vandalism and graffiti are worlds apart - CTCV now that’s definitely vandalism as are other examples that destroy or deface property.  But the original artwork in the example above is art and it’s such a shame to ruin it.  There are many examples of public arts most notably sculptures - these cost the govt and taxpayer quite a tidy sum to be commissioned, erected and maintained.  Here we have vibrant art provided free for all to enjoy and some group of misdirected vigilantes go and vandalise it.  For one they are hypocritically engaging in the illegal behaviour they find so abhorent.  And two they are attacking the wrong medium - it’s the stupid tags that idiots hastily scrawl everywhere that they should be trying to control.  But i guess CTCV on top of similar crap wouldn’t look as good or even get noticed.

    • Chris Grealy says:

      03:53pm | 07/09/09

      “In the clandestine world of spray can art, tagging over another person’s work is considered a major insult.” Not so. There is no honour among thieves, and the mindless morons who graffiti are just as likely to cover one of their mate’s tags as they would beautiful art and sculpture.

    • JD says:

      04:25pm | 07/09/09

      And what authority do you have that on Chris?

      Again I feel the need to point out that there’s a huge difference between the highly organised, extremely talented artists that are covering the industrial wastes that modernisation has left behind to rot with their stunning and through provoking creations, and some idiot 15 year old breathing paint and scribbling unintelligble rubbish in an offensive manner with no regard to the destruction of property.

      You’d be surprised at the communities that form around not so legitamate activities Chris, and how mutual respect can spring up a code of conduct between them.

      Some people can’t openly do things that hurt no one, please some, and bring great pleasure to others. For some it’s extreme running, for others it’s graffiti, and for others again it’s urban exploration.

      There’s a whole secret world out there if you open your eyes, and it’s not so bad!

    • Phil says:

      04:29pm | 07/09/09

      Given the choice to rank these options
      a) blank wall
      b) graffiti on a wall
      c) advertisement on wall

      I’d take option b) or option a) before c) any day.

    • me says:

      08:36pm | 07/09/09

      Agree with JD, and Phil at the end makes a bloody good point too.  I dont want a 40 foot fricken VW in front of me everytime I look out a window.

      Some of the artwork as you travel down the train lines is actually pretty bloody brilliant.  In some councils they even hire these people to create murals etc of relevant things, in their graffiti style.

      I remember there was a particularily hideously tagged wall, and the picture that was sprayed over the top was absolutely brilliant.  Of course some idiot tagged over it, but thats not the point.

      I think you need to be a little less one eyed in your review, and perhaps take the time to admire some of the finer pieces of art.

      Some people think that the mona lisa looks crap, its all a matter of taste.

    • DEEPONE says:

      01:00pm | 24/01/10

      If arts a crime I hope god forgives me.

      You would have NO problems at all with advertising along the train lines and it will happen, in time. I’m sure you’ve seen the advertising on the trams in the city for McDonals and the like? They got that idea from us so called “vandels” Soon, in time, the train lines will resemble a kmart catalogue and I hope you like it.

      The only reason, the only REAL reason you don’t like graffiti is because its an uncontrolled, raw emotion done purely for enjoyment.
      I read these comments and it just inspires me to go and paint more because obviously us “vandels” arn’t doing a good enough job to open your eyes and wake you up from your shut eye existance.

      You all say you hate “that tagging shit” but the “murals” are ok.
      All these new laws being inforced promote tagging.

      It’s alot quicker to throw up tags with less chance of being caught and jailed.
      it takes balls to stand on a train line for 4-8 hours creating a mural hiding from transit cops and train drivers.
      At the end of the day it doesn’t matter what you think anyway.
      there will always be a kid who feels the need to put a name on a wall.

      one of these names has adorned the sydney harbour bridge during new year celebrations. remember the word “destiny” on the bridge.
      it was dedicated to a very early “vandel” who wrote “destiny” all over sydney.

      We paint for us, not for you, if you enjoy it good on you, if you don’t, thats a real shame. The only problamatic graffiti is the buildings that steal our lovely landscape the dull grey concrete walls that take away from what was such a beautiful landscape.

    • Blank Wall says:

      10:32pm | 06/04/10

      Well-said deepone! What people often forget is that graffiti often brightens up an otherwise dull space. If you like blank walls so much go and live in Singapore and make us all happy when you get chucked in jail for eating bubble gum while your at it.

    • Michael says:

      01:07pm | 27/10/10

      ‘Deepone’ the word on the bridge was ‘eternity’ as any intelligent person would know and it is spelt vandal. The word eternity was written all over Sydnet in CHALK, it was Arthur Stace’s way of trying to spread the message of christianity.  Also most crimes require ‘balls’ or stupidity.

      The graffiti is mostly art. Sometimes it is good art. Mostly it is abstract colours and indecipherable letters which does not hold much interest to me personally but may or may not to others. However, even the really good art is a disgusting defacement of property and never should have been created without the owners permission. Go draw it on your own wall and people who want to see it will come and see it people who do not will not. Let everyone else paint their own walls as they see fit.

    • shea says:

      09:56am | 29/08/11

      it stands for cops that cap vandles

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

@SquigglyRick likewise!

Daniel Piotrowski

Hurray racism is fixed no protesters at anti-Islam demonstration http://t.co/hRFbZq8u9h

ToryShepherd

OI TWITTER! Need your best misheard lyrics pronto for @891adelaide's #thebuzz! Hit me, please!

Daniel Piotrowski

@SquigglyRick I really meant without me writing any news

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter