I don’t know how it happened. It could be higher levels of blue-rinse in the water. Maybe it’s a spike in the sales of model trains. Or a sudden surge in the demand for lamingtons. But 2009 is unofficially shaping up to be The Year Of The Wowser.

The Chaser team - victims of an outbreak of wowserism.

With almost German precision (if I am permitted to use nationality as the basis of my point), the chorus of shrill voices responding to controversy in comedy has been oscillating at a rock solid bi-weekly frequency in recent months.

While you have to admire the sheer energy these biddies have - you can’t grant them any real depth of understanding when it comes to the art form. (And yes. It is an art form.)

After all, the people that make the most noise about scandals in comedy are usually the ones that will tell you at the drop of a tweed hat that they would never have the indignity to consume such inappropriate media in the first place.

If it weren’t for their fevered scouring of the first few pages of the tabloids, or tuning into talkback for the latest controversy, most wouldn’t even be aware of the existence of such distasteful televisual sour-meats.

News editors know this, and push the buttons of those who are most likely to pipe up. And usually, before the offending vehicle is out of the starting blocks.

In the duration of the recent wowser-wars, I can’t count the amount of times I’ve read a story about a controversy that pre-empts the actual controversy.

“Fresh outrage has been sparked over a sketch in an upcoming episode of…” is the line journalists like to use to get the meaty fires of good old white-bread fury started.

Never mind the fact that most of the general public haven’t actually seen the show, or have any idea of its context –  the most important thing to know is that it will shake the very fiber of your moral being.

Outrage! Now! Look at this filth! Scream! Scream damn you!

However, last week, it looks like the wowser’s precision timing was off by a couple of beats.

John Safran’s Race Relations copped the shock of pre-ambling pot-shots but missed the veritable tsunami of public fury. Maybe it was just luck on his part – the public are a fickle lot.

Only five registered complaints were taken by the ABC (at 10:30pm) for a show which was touted by pre-packaged outrage mob The Family First Party as “the lowest point in Australian television history”.

It’s hard to say if the rest of the series will pique the lynching interests of the fist shaking masses – but it’s going to be a fun ride to watch. After all, Safran himself said the first episode contained, in his opinion, the weakest material in the series.

Maybe it’s his self-deprecating and disarming style that cleverly masks the controversial aspects of his stunts – where as The Chaser’s fester openly - and really, taking aim at a Safran gag is like zooming in on the penis of a meticulously crafted nude sculpture and decrying it as filth.

In this case, the penis not so mighty. But somehow, I don’t think the war is over just yet.

But while you are tuning your screeching vocal chords and inking your typewriters in preparation for the next assault, Mr. and Mrs. Toenail of Nambucca Heads, there is one final thought that I’d like you to consider.

If you were to be quizzed about what defines the Australian character, I can bet my bottom dollar that amongst the plethora of beige answers like “fair go” and “mateship”, you would arrive at the embodiment of the Great Australian Larrikin.

And that’s the real kicker. The very thing you protest against is the very thing that defines you as an Australian. And, like it or not, the larrikin isn’t the cheeky, black and white heel clicker you imagine him or her to be.

It’s Graham Kennedy, it’s Bert Newton, it’s Paul Hogan and it’s John Blackman. It’s Tony Martin, it’s Magda Szubanski and it’s Glenn Robins. But also, it’s Chas Licciardello, it’s Heath Franklin, it’s Chris Lilley, and it’s John Saffran.

It’s every stand up comedy show that you don’t go to. It’s taking the piss, it’s having a dig, it’s being cheeky, but it’s also eviscerating the darker aspects of our nature.

The Australian T.V Larrikin is an amorphous beast. It’s continually evolving and reflecting the culture of the time. Yes, it’s spiky. At times, it will cause you to cringe. It might even offend you.

But it’s this very edge that makes us who we are as a nation. This edge is a vital part of our unique, laconic character. If you plane off the edge, you squeeze out the lifeblood.

God forbid you have any real success in your quest to rub a black mark over every swear word, controversy or sketch that does not fit into your easily digestible, homogenized, bland boundaries.

So before you start screaming and shouting at what you perceive to be the next comedic aberration, just relax. Take a breath.

Leave comedy to the comedians, and to those who appreciate comedians of all shades. We’re enjoying it. If it offends us, our skin is thick enough to deal with it. How about yours?

Besides, if you snub out every spiky moment in television, what clips will Richard Wilkins respond to on 20-1 in 10 year’s time?

That is what you watch, right?

Most commented

33 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • neelo says:

      06:29am | 26/10/09

      Bravo Mr Perez! Spot on to the very last line. Also +1 for cleverest phallic reference on The Punch thus far.

    • Mark says:

      06:56am | 26/10/09

      Our sense of humour tends to evolve with age - what we thought hilarious as a teen is often terribly unfunny to us in our later years, and as with alot of TV entertainment , a lot of it is immature drivel dressed up as adult entertainment. 
      Safran’s sperm bank ‘sketch’ was something I would have had a good laugh at 25 years ago. As for the Chaser - like a good wine, eventually it will turn to vinegar.
      Most contemporary Aussie humour is not character- based, but something that endlessly pokes fun at others. While funny at times, it’s neither endearing or enduring.

    • Helen says:

      07:53am | 26/10/09

      Hey, an article complaining about the “beige” “blue rinse” people being “shrill” about teh modern cutting edge humour. In other words, wall-to-wall cliche being employed to try and defend stuff the cliche-monger thinks is cutting edge. Irony alert!

      Almost every point is wrong, as well, including the central premise. Most bloggers I’ve read giving valid criticisms of off humour have been younger twenty and thirtysomethings. Hardly the tweed hat set. Newsflash, people of your own age group, sadly, don’t all agree with you. And they’re quite savvy to silencing tactics such as describing people as “shrill” and “screaming” and making up assumptions about them.

      The only shrill thing I hear is the writer.

    • Jesse Perez says:

      08:22am | 26/10/09

      If you feel the need to publicly complain about comedy, you are beige and blue rinse. Irrespective of your age.

    • Tim says:

      08:40am | 26/10/09

      Jesse,
      finally someone who speaks some sense.
      If you don’t like it then don’t watch it. Simple.

    • DG says:

      09:03am | 26/10/09

      I think that Helen is on to something there.

      “Most bloggers I’ve read giving valid criticisms of off humour have been younger twenty and thirtysomethings”.

      But my interpretation of this observation is very different. I would argue that we have managed to create a generation of whiners. Rather than having the character to be able to say “I don’t like what your saying but I respect your right to say it” we scream “It please’th me not. Banish it”. How about our younger generation take a bit of Choppers advice and “harden the (*&^ up” ?

      We have a generation which, instead of expecting to improve ourselves and expand our horizons, we demand that every one else conform with our expectations.

      Very much on point: an e-mail list that I regularly subscribe to included the following in response to complaints about the use of the line “scream like a little girl” in a previous edition of the list -

      “To raise a strong person, it is better to teach your child to be strong than to teach everyone around them to watch what they say. You don’t learn how to be a good football player by telling the other team to be gentle, you lift weights and toughen yourself up. Teaching your child to protest every innocuous comment they hear is closer to teaching them how to whine than teaching them how to be strong.”

    • Helen says:

      09:10am | 26/10/09

      So, teaching children (and people in general) to STFU and suck it up is teaching them to be strong. Have you thought this through, people?

    • LH says:

      09:31am | 26/10/09

      Absolutely spot-on. Sadly, good innovative comedy is just one casualty of the new wowserism, along with having a bottle of wine or a few pots of beer with dinner, tucking into a delicious Mighty Angus and even hugging.

      The constant outpouring of moral outrage over ‘offensive’ comedy programs begs the question of whether these people have discovered the off switch yet.

    • NKW says:

      09:33am | 26/10/09

      I think the most important thing to teach our children is the ability to know when to “STFU and suck it up” and when to “scream like a girl”.  In this case (ie Humor) it is necessary to teach them everyone has a different sense of humour and just because you may not find something particulalry funny, doesn’t mean you have to bang on about it to anyone who doesn’t agree. 

      In essence, I agree with everything DG has written and have been, and will continue to be, very mindful of teaching my kids that everyone is different and to show a bit of tolerance.

      I would rather have a strong child than a whiner.

    • DG says:

      09:43am | 26/10/09

      Helen,

      That’s not it at all.

      The point is that we have gotten to the point that whining over every little thing is part of our daily existence. We are expected to mind the delicate sensibilities of everyone (in much same way as women were to be protected from profanity for fear that they would be distressed by those words where as men could cope quite comfortably). This protectionist approach is nothing more than a way of saying “You can’t cope with the odd joke about some cultural attribute so the rest of the world will shield your tender ears”.

      There is indeed a time and a place to stand up and be heard - but it is a gesture that should be used sparingly lest it lose all meaning.

      Generally, I am of the opinion that people should be permitted to say whatever they like so long as they do not incite violence towards another person.

    • TheJoker says:

      09:43am | 26/10/09

      Comedy?Isn’t that supposed to be funny stuff that makes everyone laugh? Overanalyse it to death and then complain it’s not funny! Yikes!

    • Stephen Pickells says:

      09:44am | 26/10/09

      Yes, Tim is right. If you don’t like it, don’t watch. At the risk of flogging a dead horse, I employed this simple guideline to avoid watching Hey Hey it’s Saturday. But when the Jackson Jive controversy hit the fan, I couldn’t resist hitting YouTube to see for myself. And you know what? I did find it offensive.
      I saw six middle-aged medical professionals claiming to pay tribute to the Jacksons. Well, if they’d wanted to pay tribute, they could have spent a little more time rehearsing their moves. It was appalling. You had one guy going in one direction, when everyone else was going in the other. You had some guys putting their hands up when the others were bringing theirs down.
      And what about the reference to obesity? I’m sure these guys were wearing fat-suits, but nobody complained about that.

    • Jesse Perez says:

      09:53am | 26/10/09

      Sometimes, yes. If it is something that is worthy of outrage, then certainly, it is a good thing to speak up. But comedy, even black comedy, is not worthy of outrage. And if an off colour sketch on a comedy program shakes you to your very foundations then it’s time to look at how hyper-sensitive you are, because that isn’t healthy.

      Comedy is an artform. It’s subjective. Even if a large group of people take exception to it, it does not warrant its death.

      If fine combs are being run across scripts to make sure nothing offends, which it seems we are headed, this is a bad thing.

    • Jesse Perez says:

      09:54am | 26/10/09

      Sometimes, yes. If it is something that is worthy of outrage, then certainly, it is a good thing to speak up. But comedy, even black comedy, is not worthy of outrage. And if an off colour sketch on a comedy program shakes you to your very foundations then it’s time to look at how hyper-sensitive you are, because that isn’t healthy.

      Comedy is an artform. It’s subjective. Even if a large group of people take exception to it, it does not warrant its death.

      If fine combs are being run across scripts to make sure nothing offends, which it seems we are headed, this is a bad thing.

    • H says:

      10:02am | 26/10/09

      The problem isn’t wowzers, the problem is that the comedy has been poor. The Chaser’s cancer comedy was by their own admission a result of them running out of ideas. Fact is, if your only recourse to “comedy” (and I use the term very loosely) is to offend without wit and creativity - comedy probably isn’t for you or isn’t for you anymore.

      Why is it the likes of Harry Shearer, That Mitch & Webb Look, Sean Micallef, Chris Lilley -while occassionally crossing the line, don’t ever get the “moral outrages of 2009” simple - because they are GOOD COMEDIANS.

      It’s pretty easy to do poor comedy and blame the unfavourable response on “Wowzers” - its harder to look at yourself and say I’m not actually a good enough comedian to make people laugh without attacking say - children with cancer.

    • martinX says:

      10:54am | 26/10/09

      Simply calling someone an Australian TV Larrikin does not automatically give them a free pass to do anything they want. Even the Chaser boys admitted that the sketch had gone too far - hey, does that make them wowsers?

      Also, if this brouhaha was occurring a few years ago, I feel sure that John Howard would be the #1 villain of the wowser accusation. How come the current PM gets off so lightly?

    • Dave says:

      11:05am | 26/10/09

      Hey Hey, the chaser, Kyle Sandilands, and John Saffron, it is an eclectic group

    • hoofman says:

      11:12am | 26/10/09

      The Chaser was a great success in the ratings and plenty of people including me found most of it very funny. Occasionally some of the skits didn’t work. The way wowsers and easily outraged people reacted though was right over the top. Not that it hurt the ratings. And then there were the likes of H at 11.02 am who don’t get some of the humour.

    • AFR says:

      11:13am | 26/10/09

      What H said.

    • mikk says:

      11:43am | 26/10/09

      Its not the public who are wowsers.  It is the media in its laziness and tabloid tendencies that stoke the fires of outrage. The media consumers are, sadly, sheep and will follow on unthinkingly with whatever their favorite rag or shock jock tells them to think.  Until they get bored and the next new circus comes along to distract them.

      If the media ignored these disposable comedy sketch controversies and concentrated on positive messages then maybe the world would be a better place. The media seems driven these days to seek out and promote all the worst traits in our society and rarely accentuate the positive. This is leading to exaggerated dangers and fears and makes people hard, bitter and afraid. Good job shock jocks and journalists. Is this what you signed up for? Is this what you collect your pay for each week? Is this what sort of society you want to see?

    • TtFH says:

      11:48am | 26/10/09

      The problem *is* wowsers, who come in all shapes, sizes, colours and ages. They’re still wowsers..

      I recall Chris Lilley *was* one of the moral outrages of the year - maybe it was 2008 or 2007 if not 2009. Remember the outrage over the school’s “ecstasy concert”.

    • Helen says:

      11:54am | 26/10/09

      “It’s every stand up comedy show that you don’t go to. It’s taking the piss, it’s having a dig, it’s being cheeky, but it’s also eviscerating the darker aspects of our nature.

      The Australian T.V Larrikin is an amorphous beast. It’s continually evolving and reflecting the culture of the time. Yes, it’s spiky. At times, it will cause you to cringe. It might even offend you.

      But it’s this very edge that makes us who we are as a nation. This edge is a vital part of our unique, laconic character. If you plane off the edge, you squeeze out the lifeblood.

      God forbid you have any real success in your quest to rub a black mark over every swear word, controversy or sketch that does not fit into your easily digestible, homogenized, bland boundaries.”

      Anyone get a vision of Rik Mayall in The Young Ones just then?!

    • Jesse Perez says:

      12:18pm | 26/10/09

      Haha! But what about “The Kids”?

    • Jesse Perez says:

      12:24pm | 26/10/09

      Mikk - exactly. I believe the media itself are partly responsible for breeding this generation of outrage junkies. However, the commercial media need to sell papers and get listeners, so they push the buttons they know will get an instant and tumultuous response - meaning that the public are implicit in being reactionary and capricious. Comedy, and other media scandals are easily digestible and can generate white hot rage in seconds. The bigger, more difficult issues get left behind because they aren’t as easy to process and churn out.

    • Jesse Perez says:

      12:26pm | 26/10/09

      Mikk - exactly. I believe the media itself are partly responsible for breeding this generation of outrage junkies. However, the commercial media need to sell papers and get listeners, so they push the buttons they know will get an instant and tumultuous response - meaning that the public are implicit in being reactionary and capricious. Comedy, and other media scandals are easily digestible and can generate white hot rage in seconds. The bigger, more difficult issues get left behind because they aren’t as easy to process and churn out.

    • Sam says:

      01:13pm | 26/10/09

      I thought the Make A Realistic Wish Foundation skit was quite funny. And I thought Kyle Sandilands’s comment about Magda funny too. And I don’t think the Chaser team were insensitive to cancer sufferers nor Sandilands insensitive to holocaust survivors. I think they’re both cases where the public is being made to feel pity for the butt of the joke, after initially laughing their heads off. We laugh first, then we feel a little guilty because someone’s feelings got hurt, then we rise up in the name of “never again” and “lest we forget”... only to do it again in a couple of weeks to somebody else. Either this is normal behaviour, or we are fundamentally defective creatures. Seems like offensive jokes and wars are here to stay. Might as well laugh, nothing is going to stop people from dying. Aaaah, how sad! Can someone cheer me up with a joke?

    • Craig says:

      01:30pm | 26/10/09

      Well the main reason for the rise of wowsers isn’t that they are more numerous. It is simply as you state that the dear old cynical media, especially the website editors in the desperate search for hits just set up scenarios to provoke them. And of course the willingness of every half bit pressure group to provide comment on something to see their name and clever acronym in pixels and maybe ink

    • DG says:

      03:08pm | 26/10/09

      @martinX :

      You mean a group that would have said anything to keep their career alive said that they thought the joke went too far? Wow, there’s a shock.

      I understand Charles Darwinis credited with saying: ‘What is the value of the word of a slave given before his master?’

    • jimmy says:

      03:45pm | 26/10/09

      But Two and a Half Men is just SOOO FUNNY! Why would I want to watch anything else!?!

    • Cuppa says:

      03:50pm | 26/10/09

      ‘H’ you are absolutely spot on.Very well said.

    • Nup says:

      04:10pm | 26/10/09

      To answer the question:

      No.

    • jed says:

      09:49pm | 26/10/09

      most instigated by news ltd, aca and tt, no one really cares until news organisations immediately get on the phone to the usual suspects and start whipping up a frenzy for their own benefit.

    • Jules says:

      06:56pm | 27/10/09

      There’s the wowsers but more frighteningly, the wowser-enablers, namely the knee-knocking network senior management.  ABC management’s response to the Make A Wish skit (and damn it Chaser were right, they are going to die anyway…) gave the wowser throng real power and fed the beast.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@CatherineDeveny @sydwritersfest A wobble

Paul Colgan

RT @NASA: Amazing views from the International Space Station of Pavlof Volcano erupting in Alaska. http://t.co/vqBkkiOful

Paul Colgan

US Google Doodle features a girl's touching depiction of her father's return from Iraq http://t.co/4LiRFOntTY

Paul Colgan

@paulwiggins Ha. Actually, I like hiding away with a quality read. The internet used to be a guilty pleasure, now it's the other way round.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter