The turmoil of the opposition leadership spill made Parliament House an eventful place to be for a press photographer. But it has become harder than ever to satisfy the appetite of the news-hungry populace, as the increased bureaucracy is madder than ever.

Turnbull cuts a lonely figure leaving Parliament House

The feuding within the Liberal Party highlighted the antiquated and ridiculous rules that dictate where photographers and TV cameramen can go and what they can shoot at any given time.

In an attempt to deliver a professional product to our millions of readers and viewers, we were forced to break all the rules, and it has got us into all sorts of trouble.

But if we are the keepers of the light and the guardians of the “decisive moment” how else are we to capture and honestly and professionally document the events unfolding before our eyes?

As any journalist will tell you, there’s no greater feeling than getting in among the media pack - or “scrum” as it’s known – and coming out the other end with “the goods”. It is always tight, shoulder to shoulder, and there’s always the feeling that you’re walking blindly backwards, hoping to god there are no obstacles that will bring the pack crashing down on you.

Turnbull in the scrum. What's behind me here?

And, of course, there is always the chase to get the blood pumping. When Malcolm Turnbull and his wife Lucy attempted to sneak quietly out of the building after his defeat in the party room, all hell broke loose. With the media pack in hot pursuit, the furtive nature of their escape could not be concealed. Already furious at losing the crucial vote, the usually affable Turnbull turned on the pack. The pictures captured in that stairwell will, in time, be seen as part of the story of a leader’s demise.

Malcolm Turnbull leaving Parliament House. It turned out he was going to get a sandwich.
The parliamentary guidelines for filming within the building have not kept up with the demands of the voters. With the advent of the web, Australians have come to expect their news online, moments after it happens.

Unfortunately for us, these are some of the rules we are required to abide by. In accordance with the “General guidelines for Press Gallery members” the following rules apply:

  • Members of the Press Gallery may not linger in the corridors in the vicinity of the Cabinet Room, other Ministerial Wing corridors or corridors in the vicinity of party rooms or individual Senators’ and Members’ suites. In these areas, members of the Press Gallery may not seek to engage Senators or Members in conversation.
  • Filming, photography and sound recording is not permitted in the Mural Hall, the Members’ Hall or any other private access area in the central body of the building without the explicit approval of both Presiding Officers.
  • Filming, photography and sound recording is not permitted in any corridor, except the corridor of the Press Gallery itself, without explicit approval from the relevant Presiding Officer. It is not permissible for interviews of any kind to be conducted in corridors or other private circulation areas of the building without explicit approval from the relevant Presiding Officer.
  • Filming, photography and sound recording is not permitted within the Members of Parliament car parks. Journalists, photographers and camera crews must not impede the access of Senators, Members or others to any of the entrances of Parliament House. They must comply with the directions of security staff at the entrances.

Breaches of these guidelines are determined by the Presiding Officers on a case-by-case basis.

During the leadership crisis, not only were we up against it with the hall monitors - parliament house security officers - but also the Liberal Party MPs and their media managers and senators, who suddenly when the spill was announced - and uncharacteristically - became camera-shy.

Working around these conditions in an attempt to capture the decisive moment is indeed challenging. But beating the bastards at their own game is always rewarding.

Malcolm Turnbull and eh, excuse me… Claressa Surtees, the Deputy Sergeant at Arms.

The first pictures of Turnbull, as he emerged from his office to walk towards the party room, were a triumph. The opposition had three people attempting to block my line of sight as I sat patiently outside the building, looking through the windows. The expression on the face of the Deputy Sergeant at Arms, when she realised I’d got the shot, was priceless.

To capture the pictures over those hectic few days was indeed a challenge, both professionally and personally. The Deputy Sergeant at Arms is a stickler for protocol, and appears to go out of her way to ensure that the media has as little access as possible.

Whenever she receives a complaint about us gathering for a shot, she promptly appears and orders us to move on.

Choker: Turnbull in the Parliament chamber, where this kind of picture is allowed.

It seems that when the politicians want their message to be heard by the voters they never complain about the bustling media packs, but when the shoe is on the other foot and they are cowering in their trenches, they are lightning fast to complain, resulting in us being moved on.

A politician who wants to talk

But the Australian public is the biggest loser, missing those crucial and often historical shots.

While politicians crave the best of both worlds, the humble hacks and photographers and TV men and women of the press gallery are calling on those in charge to sit down and have an adult conversation with us about the access – or rather lack of access - we’re given.

Turnbull in one of his last days as Opposition Leader.

The people of Australia depend on us to provide accurate reporting of the everyday workings of Parliament House. We have the privilege of being granted permission to occupy space and continue to work alongside both political parties in the building, but for how much longer?

Will the right to know for the Australian people win over, or will the power of a few outdated rules and over-emotional politicians win the day?

What are you gonna do?

And then he said ...

And as for hecklers ...

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

29 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Keith Williams says:

      06:25pm | 18/07/10

      You refer to the stairwell pictures but no link to them…Come on…

      Keith

    • Onlooker says:

      11:29am | 05/07/10

      I, for one, am grateful to Gary and all the other shooters who allow us insights into the way our parliament and democracy is run. All those condemning you should have a cold shower and a real good think about the implications of the “respectful” approach they advocate. By the way, Princess Di was killed by her own drunk driver, not by the paparazzi.

    • Joan says:

      11:18am | 11/06/10

      How about changing this stale old pic - put the Punch back into Punch pics- something fresh please.Today is 11/06/10 yet last years pic a daily event for Punch- better no pic than last years pic particularly in relationship to politics - its like reading Dec 2009 news today- meaningless.

    • MsBogan says:

      03:40pm | 13/04/10

      The parliamentary guidelines for filming within the building have not kept up with the demands of the voters - spare me! Next you will be telling us you are just giving the readers what they want.

    • Smithy says:

      10:22pm | 24/03/10

      Remember Princess Diana? Obviously not, or maybe you just think that the media have the right to hound people as you deem fit, sometimes even into their graves. You can claim this is for the public good, but you are too vain to admit it is all about your ego. The media is seen as low life profession, a necessary evil with the very occasional, exceptional journo. You sir are no exception.

    • Elizabeth says:

      02:01pm | 09/02/10

      I think the Turnbull pic going down the stairs is a good “news shot”.
      But your article is self-serving nonsense.
      Politicians would never leave their offices if you were allowed to capture their every move in Parliament House. This is simply a ridiculous idea.

    • steven t says:

      05:13pm | 18/12/09

      Gary…you should have been a comedy writer…“Keepers Of The Light”...
      hahahaha….

    • Dalma Smithy says:

      11:10am | 18/12/09

      This article sums it all - not ” scrum” as the papparazzi would have us believe, but more likely mongrel ’ scum’..emphasis in capital letters. If there weren’t rules to govern the press corp junkies and control their shenanagins, they would over run the establishment like some charnal house - rafferty rules, gone ballistic’s - mad.. As it is, they partake of all the freebies, breakfast, dinner and nibbles, next they will want lodgings, internet services, and a chaffeur driven car. The work that they appear to carry out, is 80% self immolation and aggrendisement - promoting themselves first, foremost and everlast.
      Journalism has sunk to chaotic depths, and there is never truthful reporting any more. Sensationism is the byword, and often headline captions are nothing of the sort. The media - TV, news etc are an abysmal mockery, and the Press Council is a toothless sham teddybear. Until we prosecute a few hedonistic individuals for starters, most of these venal cretins, will stretch the rules to suit their idea of a scoop.
      Integrity, honesty and sincerity - Rupert Murdock would be tossing in his grave.

    • Andrew Taylor says:

      06:42am | 16/12/09

      No Gary, this is not good political photography. Shooting from the ‘scrum’ and getting the ‘goods’. Stuff the pack, I want the picture that no one else gets. This is not about rules, this is not about pictures missed, it’s about the picture that I, as a consumer, get to see, the picture that reveals something about people and how they deal with the event, the picture that tells me something that the words can’t. If the rules are broken to get that picture so be it. In the above coverage I have not seen a picture that reveals anything much to me.
      Next time let’s have a discussion about how you “nailed” a great political picture.

    • Regretful says:

      05:27pm | 15/12/09

      Cringeworthy piece, but many, many chips on shoulders amongst the respondents. smile

    • Realist says:

      01:11pm | 15/12/09

      I hope you read the comments made on your article.

      I agree with the majority here when they say: Get real. The reality is that with or without the photography that you claim is essential to the story, the Australian public would still have had the news broken to them at the same time, and the footage and still photography that the Serjeant-at-Arms allowed the press to get (in spite of the rules) would have sufficiently illustrated the events of the day.

      The members and senators have as much right to walk through their workplace unimpeded as you do.

      Further, I wonder if you’ll continue to regard the officers of the Parliamentary Security Service as “hall monitors” the next time they prevent someone from accessing YOUR workplace with a dangerous item, or the next time they assist someone in distress or help to prevent or contain an emergency.

      Wake up to yourself.

    • Brett Keynes says:

      01:20am | 15/12/09

      Interesting article Gary, still enjoy your pics after all these years. Keep up the good work ol son.

    • Bitten says:

      10:21pm | 14/12/09

      FF’s sake you douche! Your head is shoved so far up your backside the sound is muffled!

      You don’t contribute anything of value to society. I know, you think you do, but you don’t. Fact is all that shameless ‘the Australian public’ ‘right to know’ ‘keepers of the light’ tripe is just that - tripe and the Australian public sees through it. Now go out, donate some blood, then go back to university and study nursing. Become a teacher. Do something worthwhile - the Australian public would be most grateful.

      If you can’t manage that, just use a wee bit less oxygen. You don’t deserve it.

    • Leah says:

      09:17pm | 14/12/09

      I don’t see the point in breaking rules to get photos of a political uproar in parliament house. It’s the information that is needed. It is not a situation where pictures speak louder than words. Yeah there are some situations, like wars, where the pictures illustrate for us the horrors that happen more effectively than words can. But those are worse horrors than a leadership spill and those pictures are far more effective in their job than the pictures of an ex-opposition leader walking down stairs.

    • Dallas Beaufort says:

      05:35pm | 14/12/09

      Well Gary, is suppose shooting ducks on a pond, gets a bit boring?

    • IMHO says:

      03:57pm | 14/12/09

      What a lot of crap. Go and get a real job.

      “Keepers of the Light”

      LMFAO!

    • AT says:

      10:52am | 14/12/09

      Jesus mate, could you be any more up yourself?

      On the one hand you describe yourself ‘delivering a professional product to millions’, a ‘keeper of the light’ ‘honestly and professionally documenting unfolding events’, and on other hand you tell us about Turnbull’s ‘sneaky furtive escape’, ridicule the Deputy Sergeant at Arms (a public servant) and the ‘priceless expression’  that you managed (or imagined?) to elicit because you got one over her and eulogise the reward of “beating the bastards at their own game”.

      Then, you call for an “adult conversation” about access…

      Perhaps you could tender as evidence the puerile captions accompanying the snaps in this article? Maybe you could deliver a rousing speech detailing how Henri Cartier Bresson’s highfalutin “decisive moment” concept manifests itself while you’re rooting about in your beloved media scrum? (Known more tellingly as a “cluster f..k” in more authentic circles).

      Of necessity, PH media access is restricted —  much in the same way coverage of sporting events is restricted — an unfortunate consequence of these limitations is that coverage can become a routine and contrived affair, nevertheless, sports photographers manage to capture images that transcend the obvious and reveal a greater truth without ‘breaking the rules’. Why can’t you?

      You rightly acknowledge the “privilege” of being allowed work in PH and express concern you may be further restricted, but please don’t embarrass yourself by claiming your excesses, which may provoke these increased restrictions, are performed in the name of “the right to know for the Australian people”.

      I suspect the Australia people expect you to “honestly and professionally document the events” and really couldn’t care less about how clever you were sneaking an illicit, not-so-revealing picture of Malcolm Turnbull in a stairwell. If you relish this combative, predatorial approach perhaps you should move on up to paparazzi photography where those skills can flourish and the rewards are far greater.

    • 6clegs says:

      10:48am | 14/12/09

      uhoh - does doing live interviews via mobile phone in the corridor outside MPs suites come under the above highlighted rules? if so. *slaps-wrist*

      From someone who became caught up in a media scrum (actually, I was “followed”  by media as i headed to talk to the PM who was starting to be surrounded himself…)
      Let me tell ya: I’ve played team sports, ridden/handled my share of big boofy horses and think nothing of crowds, but that was just a tad scary being ‘questioned’ while trying not to trip over in the scrum of chairs/people/stairs/stage because I wanted *my own* money shot with the PM… (which i didn’t get)
      Perhaps if I knew it would happen one could’ve steeled ones nerve? Instead I backed off and asked the journo to call me. As the afternoon progressed and I didn’t hear from him I thought he’d found someone else, but he did call, along with other already pre arranged- so that’s how I managed to maybe break some rules meself… sorry for going on about me.

      I for one now have a whole new appreciation for Canberra’s press corp. And I *loved* being able to follow the Libs fall into cannibalism that day, via Punch. Escpecially now knowing the layout of Parliament House made it much more real- that place is huge!

      But try to remember the difference between the paparazzi and what you fellas do, h’mm?

      Love ya work!  So keep on shining that spotlight. wink

      (BTW am a [now retired] small time journo myself, what it must’ve been like for civilians caught up in that melee is anyones guess)

    • haggis says:

      09:57am | 14/12/09

      Yeah, but imagine life without us . . .

    • monkeytypist says:

      09:15am | 14/12/09

      Yawn.  Yet another assertion of the bizzare idea current among many journalists that working for multi-national conglomerate that happens to own a printing press gives you the God-given right to go anywhere and say anything about anyone.  I’d have a lot more respect if journos would be honest about what this is really for - scooping your peers to win profesisonal kudos and sell more newspapers.  “The Public’s Right To Know” looks suspicously like The Media Mogul’s Right To Make Money Off Sensationalism.

    • Stephen Pickells says:

      09:03am | 14/12/09

      I agree with DG. A photograph of a politician walking along a corridor does very little to explain a situation. It’s not like frontline photojournalism where the picture actually illustrates what is happening. I suppose Gary believes the paparazzi were entitled to chase Lady Di into that tunnel.

    • Chris says:

      08:51am | 14/12/09

      “Keepers of the light”? Good god - does anything else ever written confirm the distorted world of the Canberra press gallery?

      The media is not allowed to roam freely in any workplace in Australia, so why should parliament house be any different. The media has a priviliged role, but this does not extend to unfettered access to all corners of the building. Our elected representatives should be afforded privacy in conducting their affairs like any other individual.

      Chasing Mr Turnbull down a staircase is a disgraceful act as bad as any papparazzi the world over.

    • DG says:

      08:27am | 14/12/09

      “In an attempt to deliver a professional product to our millions of readers and viewers, we were forced to break all the rules, and it has got us into all sorts of trouble. “

      Sounds like an excuse that could be used by people smugglers, drug dealers, traders in child pornography and any other brand of criminal you wish to mention.

      I’m not sure how Turnbull’s “decisive moment” was his decision to lunch with his partner or to walk down a hall to a press conference? Nothing hinged on either of those matters, they changed nothing and added nothing in the way of “news”. They were little more than an opportunity for further speculation and media hype.

      One must be careful not to get caught up in their own story and mistake the money shot for a decisive moment. They are by no means synonymous. Simply put - the later is a moment that something of significance happens, the former is something that can be sold.

      Now, taking pictures in a public place is fine whether or not there is any story to be told - go for it. That includes outdoors, in the House of reps or the senate chamber and other places where photography is permitted. The sale publishing of a photograph unlawfully obtained should be a crime with a hefty fine for both the photographer and the media outlet that publishes the photo - that includes photographs taken in a place where photography is prohibited without consent (determined not by the subject of the photo but the controller of the premises from which the photograph is taken).

      The image is bout sensationalism, not news. People are too lazy to read a story without the photo - that does not suggest that the photo ads anything to the story, just that the population concerned really don’t care about the topic.

      Finally -
      “The Deputy Sergeant at Arms is a stickler for protocol, and appears to go out of her way to ensure that the media has as little access as possible.”

      Would it not be equally true to say “...to ensure that the media is granted the access to which they are entitled”? After all if she is a stickler for the rules she only stops the media from doing things that they are not entitled to do.

      This is not to suggest that all ‘privacy’ rules and other limitations on publication are in the best interests of the population at large. But the right to catch a happy snap of a former leader of a party walking down a corridor that he is entitled to occupy? That’s hardly oppression of the highest order as suggested in the article. It certainly does not appear this presumed ‘right to know’. After all - the images described above add nothing to the story only fuel the hype.

      If your real question is “Will the right to know for the Australian people win over, or will the power of a few outdated rules and over-emotional politicians win the day?” - get stuck into FOI issues or undertake some investigative journalism rather than lazy demands for the right to take happy snaps in the halls of parliament house.

    • Louis McLennan (An Australian Person) says:

      07:51am | 14/12/09

      I’d love to read more about the parliament and of course more pictures. That said, I’m sick of the media using it’s power to support the ALP and take away from everyone else. It gets old quickly.

    • Helping you focus the spotlight... says:

      07:49am | 14/12/09

      Youre right “Keepers of the light”
      You of course mean the “Keepers of the Big damn spotlight!”
      I told Turnbull what to do. He didnt listen. I said, “Get rid of the old guard in his party, including anyone with the name of Kevin….Especially Kevin.”

    • scratching my head says:

      07:33am | 14/12/09

      What a pointless winge.

      And now for the news - you are in fact not the centre of the world. What on earth gives you the rght to ‘break all the rules’ for the mythical ‘goods’? If anyone outside he media breaks the rules you villify them. If you break the rules, you villify the rules.

      It must be nice to live in your self important andself reassuring world. How do I get in?

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      06:58am | 14/12/09

      HA HA HA! The keepers of the light! You got me there. Don’t you mean the “makers and the breakers” of politicians and manipulators of the political system. Media rules the world. Can’t stop laughing at the “keepers of the light” comment. Thanks for that.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

RT @gregprichard: The Victorian Sports Minister has just sent the New Zealand Prime Minister a commiserative email. #stateoforigin

Anthony Sharwood

@VanillathunderV fair comeback. But seriously, if that was a try then I'll book my skiing in Queensland this year

Anthony Sharwood

@BrettS69 the loveliest thing about post-origin is the sledges from gloating qlders #ratherbeagoodloserthanapoorwinner

Anthony Sharwood

That is the video referee howler to end all howlers to end all howlers to end all howlers to end all howlers #stateoforigin

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Lying on a cold table in an unfamiliar place and undergoing a core biopsy was probably one of the most…

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

Red alert, ladies. Making jokes about your ability at work is not funny particularly at board level.…

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Punishing the baddies is only fun in the movies. In real life it’s messy, expensive, and fraught…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter