Nothing screams erectile dysfunction as loudly as a diamond encrusted Rolex.

In my vast experience of travelling the globe, participating in royal activities, grand soirees, and through my exposure to the well heeled, I have come to the conclusion that it takes a certain type of man to sport a watch the value of which would feed several villages in the Sudan for years. As well, one would perhaps think that in light of the Global Financial Cock-up, those with fat wallets pillaged from haemorrhaging shareholders would catch on that discretion is the better part of valour – or at least, prudent during our Bernie Madoff days.

But these men are of a sad, and certain age, needy of ego and (I suspect) with erections propped up by Viagra and carbon based stones. Some have emerged from communist China with newly found capitalist bank accounts and they want everyone to know it. Occasionally, they are Hip Hop gangsta rappers who believe that extra bling will function as a light source if ever marooned in the wilderness. Certain Queensland property developers have also been known to sport the links of time & tack, co-coordinating their ensembles with white shoes.

Sometimes they are very minor members (and have minor members – again I hasten to add, I suspect) of a Middle Eastern Royal family riding on the coat-tails of their Oxford educated cousins. They may hail from Moscow and be of an entrepreneurial bent. Occasionally, the species, known as nouveau riche, or self-fabricated man,  is also known to frequent Bellevue Hill and Double Bay, or the owner’s circle during Spring Racing Carnival in Melbourne.

As disparate as they are geographically, the common belief these males all seem to hold, is that once blinded by the eye burning reflections from all that gold, crystal and diamond, young, leggy and gormless women will love them for themselves. Did I mention the moon is purple with green spots?

Which brings me to the classic MMV (Male Menopause Vehicle), think man well over forty five, driving a Ferrari, Aston Martin or Porsche. Rule of thumb: the larger the horse power, the smaller the inside leg measurement; better performance on the road, lacklustre performance in the bedroom (or so I suspect).

On any sunny morning, or amidst the dappled afternoon light caressing the tree lined streets, these overly tanned, often recently divorced men, travel the upper middle class highways surrounding our best performing postcodes, nary making it past second gear and sporting white baseball caps (covering a thinning pate) and tasselled leather loafers as they sit ensconced in their shiny convertibles. 

In the evenings, these specimens of motor enthusiasm frequent leather “sofa-ed” nightspots and dangle key-chains artfully between freshly manicured fingertips in order to attract jersey clad Paris Hilton doppelgangers with the promise of being allowed to “take my car for a spin later”. It’s all attention on the chassis – little deliverance on the performance and predictably, no understanding of the transmission – particularly with the later models.

Personally, I love four on the floor and a tiger in the, er, tank, but I prefer high performance and all its accoutrements to be evinced with imagination and flair, not over-revved and under driven with a poor c*utch handling technique.

So gentlemen be warned; tasteful and discreet is best when it comes to wrist-wear and cars. One should wear a watch, not the watch wear one. It simply doesn’t pay to advertise your shortcomings.

76 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Anton says:

      07:59am | 01/07/09

      LOL. Hysterical! Give us more to start the day like this. I’m going to be raelly careful after Lotto rings me this morning to keep my trappings of huge wealth understated in casemy engine and horsepower be underestimated on the dating scene!

    • Pete from Sydney says:

      08:09am | 01/07/09

      so Jackie what does that say of those delusional women who spend the equivalent, if not well more on jewellery, fashion, accessories and make-up? Are they somehow sexually challenged as well?

      Why is it okay for you to write this blatantly sexist article and expect us to find it even vaguely humorous…yet God forbid that a male churns out a similiar article on the fairer sex…hung drawn and quartered I’d reckon…

    • Victor says:

      08:11am | 01/07/09

      Stop the laughter. Just b’cos many man of the type in jacqueline’s column need to buy their hair and happiness - doesn’t mean their shallow. Only missunderstood.

    • Susan says:

      08:13am | 01/07/09

      Addicted to your articles Miss J, very, very funny and so true. Thanks for the great start to my day. But can you tell me what cars are acceptable?

    • B says:

      08:17am | 01/07/09

      I’ll never look at a luxury car the saem way ever again. Bring back the swatch watch for real blokes and I will only be driving humble cars in the future. Does a Prius hybrid pass muster and enhance my sexual performance?

    • Robbie says:

      08:22am | 01/07/09

      Sounds tragically like the man my ex-wife left me for. He stroked out two years later from Viagra overuse.

    • chris says:

      08:26am | 01/07/09

      wow, a bit bitter and twisted.

    • R Barrantes says:

      08:27am | 01/07/09

      So whose been following me around? Are you watching me? I swear my hair is all my own! I don’t advertise my short-comings I just maximise my assets.

    • Rob says:

      08:34am | 01/07/09

      Such a sexist article.

      Would you pen such a sneering screed about ageing women? I suspect not, and your earlier writing supports that suspicion.

      Your contempt for the male half of humanity reflects poorly on you.

    • Debbie says:

      08:35am | 01/07/09

      Yes, from personal experience I’d say that’s as true for men and watches as it is for women and silicone.

    • Jacqueline Pascarl says:

      08:39am | 01/07/09

      Dear Rob, ouch, a little too close for comfort? And actually, I have written about women in this vein.  Have a look at my earlier column on Botox - it’s called satire by the way.

    • "Richard" says:

      08:41am | 01/07/09

      Fortunately I don’t wear a watch

    • Marina Go says:

      08:44am | 01/07/09

      Thanks Jack, you put a smile on my ‘out-of-bed-too-early’ face this morning. It’s equal parts insecurity and lack of style with those guys. As I was reading your list of types, I had a flashback to a wealthy businessman I used to know who used his trinkets of success overtly to try and bag himself a mistress, or even just a sly shag. It was a tried and true strategy for him. More often than not flashing the wares got him across the line with women looking for an easy ride (no pun intended because there’d be nothing easy about it, let’s face it). Gold-diggers only care about the size of a man’s wallet, luckily for Ferrari drivers.

    • Charles says:

      08:47am | 01/07/09

      Haven’t had such a good laugh in ages.  A great perspective without being too accusative.  Enjoyed the video and can only think of the saying WWJD, having seen some of these characters ‘in the flesh’ & out of their church they demonstrate traits such as ‘over blinging’ and excessive ‘retail therapy’ to gratify themselves & their entourage.

      As a male in my mid-50s I am constantly amused by the antics of the overly cashed-up, personality & folliclely challenged amongst my peers who seek the crutches which their $$ can afford them - most of which you have so wonderfully identified and described.  I should think that there most women appreciate the blatant advertising by the afflicted males of their shortcomings, so that they may give them a very wide berth.

      I despair to see the opposite occur and question why such a siginificant number of (generally younger) women who are attracted to these ‘enhanced’ males.  Surely it is not the Eliza Doolittle syndrome, or simply the lure of foldies, I say to myself by way of attempting to rationalise the situation.  Then progress to pondering that perhaps each is equally shallow as to find the other their soul mate?

    • Shaun says:

      08:51am | 01/07/09

      I drive a newish VW bug and I’m looking at a hybrid car. I wear a Seiko watch with no diamonds and stick my feet in lace up shoes. My postcode is underperforming and I have never had a manicure. Finally - I’m a great prospect and a good catch. Thank you Jaqueline for the morale boost to this ageing Gen X.

    • Virginia says:

      08:54am | 01/07/09

      The owner and founder of Coopers Brewery drove an old corolla and when asked why he didn’t invest in a prestige car responded - ‘When I arrive, I arrive if I had a prestige car, I would arrive when it arrived!’ Here! Here! I say - and while we are on the subject of cars - JP you did not mention the personalized number-plate which is the hight of bad taste and represents everything that is wrong with western society - unless you are a classic car collector….....in which case the number-plate is part of the investment….....

    • Sam says:

      08:57am | 01/07/09

      LOL. Next time, tell us Mere Males what you REALLY think - be gentle we’re sensitive guys.

    • Charles says:

      08:58am | 01/07/09

      Victor, that ‘they’re shallow’, not ‘their shallow’

    • Sarah says:

      09:00am | 01/07/09

      More importantly is the point being made about how much money people, male or female, spend on trying to make themselves look successful in life, “the value of which would feed several villages in the Sudan” What’s the true meaning of success? It sure aint about what car you drive or what watch your wearing. Are you a more interesting person for flaunting your wealth, I dont think so.

    • Cheryl says:

      09:18am | 01/07/09

      my daughter read both your books that we got and she loves them

    • Chang says:

      09:26am | 01/07/09

      Always concerned for the women who think many of the watches on wrists are actually originals and don’t realise they are Hong Kong knock offs. The girls are as brainless and the fellas to go for gold and not substance. so true Jackie

    • Rob says:

      09:32am | 01/07/09

      Dear Jacqueline,

      The fact that out of 19 replies, you responded only to mine says something about who is “too close for comfort”. For the record, I drive a 13 year old Mazda 626 and don’t wear a watch at all.

      As for your article on Botox, I read it as a comparison. There is in no way an equivalent sneering tone, nor the repeated put-downs that you have laid on men.

      As others commented, a man who wrote a similarly vicious article about women would be cast out of polite society, “satire” or not. Take a long hard look at your attitudes to men.

    • regina says:

      09:44am | 01/07/09

      i couldn’t care less how people spend their money. i’m sure there are rich men driving around in ferraris in white baseball caps but i don’t notice them and they don’t bother me. perhaps i move in the wrong (or right) circles.

      also just because someone is spending their money in a certain way or that they may have erectile dysfunction, doesn’t mean they don’t have other fine personal qualities or are less deserving of someone’s love.

      i also think it’s mean to mock people’s choices or personal appearance.

      and yes i do get that this is meant to be satire. i just didn’t find it at all funny.

    • Jacqueline Pascarl says:

      09:54am | 01/07/09

      Dear Rob, Love a good debate! I felt that I covered most of the bases in terms of replying to those who took umbrage with this satirical piece via my reply to you. Sometimes, a subject just lends itself to humour and observatoin and i dare say I may have had a smidge more experience with men and their doings in this arena, than you.  Comdey is subjective and if it causes discussion, then so be it! In any case, those upset by my piece should fasten their double sided toupe tape and hang on. There’s more to come! And that doens’t mean it will be about the male gender.

    • Steve-o says:

      10:13am | 01/07/09

      wow.. I must remember to downsize the watch to a sundial.. and buy a skate-board not a sportster!!

    • Rob says:

      10:51am | 01/07/09

      Dear Jacqueline,

      I shall tighten my hairplugs as I await with anticipation your next piece.

    • Peter_Griffin says:

      11:21am | 01/07/09

      Any more than a Tag-Hauer is quite simply superfluous.

    • stephen says:

      11:22am | 01/07/09

      I’ve got plastic swatch and a ‘63 ‘dub, and I even rang Bubbles ( after you-know-who karked it,) and you know what the little blighter told me?
      Well!  “good ticker and long travel, and drop the voice please” Monkey -speak for get lost, so I go and get an IWC and a girlfriend who may need a bloody good ironing, (she’s diamond encrusted) but I can say now it’s not value, but style!!

    • Wes says:

      11:43am | 01/07/09

      As a young man who is hoping one day to be able to afford to be ridiculed while driving around in my Ferrari, preferably with a Swiss watch with as many complications as conceivable (no diamonds though please) I must take offence on behalf of the inanimate objects you denigrate.  These super cars and super watches are full of ridiculously over the top technology and design which has no reason but to make us feel good while surreptiously pushing forward technology as we know it.  As an avid follower of such developments I applaud the fat old men who purchase such items to allow them to continue to exist and me to continue to wonder at their creation.  I hope one day to be a fat old man worthy of your scorn.

    • martin says:

      11:44am | 01/07/09

      i once bought one of those tiny watches that clip on your shirt cuff… hmmm. what does that mean? i go sans watch now, time is only a figment of our imagination anyway.

    • Rodney James says:

      12:45pm | 01/07/09

      You go girl. Well said. Maybe getting in touch with their feminine side could be a good thing for these lost souls. I so agree with you Jackie in all you said and if some men are going to ne sensitized from your words, they need to get a life.
      Love you lots jackie
      mister burlesque

    • Sar says:

      01:00pm | 01/07/09

      The interesting thing re a couple of the affronted men commenting here is that they forget we sheila’s do have the ability to laugh at our excesses and shallow insecurities. Kath and Kim, anyone? Ab Fab, dahhhling?

      I don’t care for the hot-car-with-saggy-male-inside-giving-me-sideways-glances-saying-I’m-hot-stuff type of guy myself, but also have no problem with their red cars as much as the women who think it’s sexy to pump their lips and boobs up with a bike pump every morning.

      What gets under my collar are the thick drivers of ALL types of cars who insist on driving dangerously, tail-gating, revving their engines and overtaking other drivers who are keeping to the speed limit. Hey Jacqueline, what about an equally witty piece that takes the mickey out of all those losers?

    • Anthony says:

      01:21pm | 01/07/09

      Amusing article, but what if people just happen to like Rolex’s and nice cars?

    • Jewels says:

      01:37pm | 01/07/09

      Jaqcueline I think your article is one that should not be taken so literally as it has by some readers. I think those who are offended know all too well that there is some truth and unfortunately some women can see the materialistic side and perhaps may make these ‘paris hilton’clones see it also and whoop! there goes their fun. I was once baited in this way and learnt the hard way that it is not all it seems. Often those who flaunt are surprisingly insecure and find it difficult to meet someone through personality alone. Simply put, they dont have one (personality). Diamonds, fancy cars and the opera are no fun without laughter and so often these men have forgotten how to laugh or choose not to in fear of seeming “common” or giving in to the life they are for so long tried to shrug off. Often new money, dare I say. These men often dont know who they are therefore could never make anyone happy. Congrats for putting it out there!

    • Ben Payne says:

      02:55pm | 01/07/09

      Hey Jacqueline, have you seen someone about your fixation on penis size?  My penis has remained the same size since puberty, even though I have owned various types of cars and watches.  Penis size bears no relation to the purchase of consumer items, and the only way that wealth might influence the size of one’s penis is through the ability to afford cosmetic surgery, the very nature of which would appear to contradict your argument.

    • Mark Ehlers says:

      03:40pm | 01/07/09

      Hey Jac

      Great article, however I think that there is a genre of men that have been dubiously bunked in with the wankers (lets not beat around the bush) to which you are referring in your article. These men are the ones that worked for it. They are the men that haven’t been driving a porsche their whole lives, but have been working for it. They are the ones that wore a Casio until their family bought them a Rolex for their 50th and the ones that have experienced both sides of money - both working for it and then having it work for you.

      I don’t belive that these men should be bunked in with the dinstant relatives of oil barons and the gay second-cousin-twice-removed of the Sultan of Brunei. Should they be persecuted for achieving? I would hate to think that you of all people would be jumping on the Australian tall-poppy syndrome band-wagon just for hits to your site.

      In Australia there is so much sensitivity about money and I really don’t thnk that this is warranted. Does it make people insecure? If so; do better. Do better at life and make a living in this world.

      I just think that there are people out there that have worked towards a goal: security for their family, a nice house in a safe suburb and car in the driveway that they have dreamed about since they were kids. I give kudos to these people and if buying an Aston Martin or a Rolex makes these blokes feel good after slogging it out for 30 years “in the real world” then I say good on them!

    • MP says:

      03:50pm | 01/07/09

      Jaqueline, I’m too financially challenged for a Ferrari and don’t have a watch (not even a fake Rolex). Even though I have no problems in the erectile or performance areas, my work_sleep-work-sleep ‘lifestyle’ leaves me no opportunity to demonstrate this.

      You do a lot of “suspecting” of facts rather than ascertaining them. However, just in case you are right and on the off chance that that I make it big in the money department, I will immediately buy a Lamborghini, a Patek Philippe and any ascosiated bling and head off to look for the nearest leather “sofa-ed” nightspot to dangle my keys in. from where i’m standing, even a Paris Hilton doppelganger for a night is starting to look attractive.

    • S says:

      03:51pm | 01/07/09

      Well thanks for giving us the low down, especially the bit about viagra which clearly you have seen in action frequently. Must be humiliating if thats the effect you have. Never mind there are real blokes around who are wiling to help and understand the older woman.

    • udi says:

      03:56pm | 01/07/09

      Dear Jaqueline,
      I wonder if having to mention that vast experience of travelling the globe, participating in royal activities, grand soirees, and exposure to the well heeled, isn’t a bit like driving a Ferrari and wearing a Rolex. We are what we are and I say, vive la différence.
      Udi

    • Wolfie Rankin says:

      04:21pm | 01/07/09

      So a guy wins the lottery, and what does he do? he has a pre-concieved idea of what rich people do, the cars, yachts, tennis courts and yes, bling… and does it make him happy? for some, yes, but not for others. although the sad rich guy has come up before, not many, if any have explained why it occurs, but I think I know. It comes down to a severe lack of imagination. If I had won the money last tuesday night then my dreams could have been realised, and it wouldn’t have involved superficial nonsense, I believe I would have been happy… alas I cannot prove it. wink

    • Ash Simmonds says:

      04:21pm | 01/07/09

      Pearls before swine flu.

    • realto says:

      05:40pm | 01/07/09

      Middle aged, no hair nor hairpiece, no watch and either a company car or a bicycle. Not sure if that makes me a psued of a different variety to the one described in the article or simply a man lacking class and style. But I’m happy as I pedal along, wind not in my hair nor getting ‘hat hair’ from the safety hat and not knowing nor caring whether I’m running late.

    • Peter Thornton says:

      06:30pm | 01/07/09

      I always thought it was old world restauranteurs (OWRs) who wore Rolex. Admittedly,  not the jewel encrusted models, but to their eternal credit, OWRs usually purchase said watches from Cash Converters. I mean, that’s entrepreneurial bent in action. As for motors: it takes a certain type of man to drive a clapped-out heap of junk. Any fool can look like a formula one driver in a sports car.

      At this point , rather than mask my agenda of trying to hook-up with Jacqueline by mentioning the integrity and, yes, the sentimental sincerity of my Swatch watch, my ‘94 Ford wagon and my lack of experience with Viagra, I feel it best thing to draw her attention to my daily, raging erection.

      - PT

    • JJ says:

      07:38pm | 01/07/09

      How are the kids?
      LOL.

    • Kelvin Punch says:

      07:41pm | 01/07/09

      WOW seems like someone has a chip on their shoulder.

      I guess James Bond should be wearing a Casio Plastic Digital (after all it does rhyme with Casino), and oh NO, James Bond must have MMV for driving SEVERAL Aston Martin, what do all these women see in him….. it must be his small nimble equipment you mentioned.

      What is wrong with men, who drive fast cars, wears diamond watches and/or slips into a silk patterned Versace suit? Nothing! And it is in my humble opinion that if one has got the money, go ahead and do whatever the fudge one like. After all, we live in a free world, while Jesus might not wear a Rolex, none of us are Jesus aren’t we, unless if you claim you are. And let’s not forget the Wild Card God gave us - free choice, so let me ask you this, who are you to criticize how people spend THEIR MONEY?

      There are different ways of people enjoying their wealth and they are quite in their rights to do so, even if some were given easy and some had to earn it the hard way. None the less, they had it in their fate/destiny/karma to have it in their life time, let them choose how they like to spend it. Why is it that we must chop down the tall poppy? Could it be Jealousy? Or is it something else? Could it possible that men drive fast cars because they simply love cars? Could it be possible that men wear diamond watches because they love the design and the quality of craftsmen ship that was in them? And let’s not to mention about women and their forever love with shoes, LV bags, diamond or their waist line

      I do have to agree that in this world, some with money don’t have the taste, while those with taste don’t usually have the money, but rarely we’re treated with ones who have money and taste, who may actually have an excellent personality. But its women like .... well let’s just say some women, would not look beyond the car, and the watch and the suit, and have some faith in that person’s inner beauty. I believe there is a word for it…. Oh yeah – Shallow.

      Before you jump into the gun, this is coming from a 27 year old, who doesn’t have diamond watch, designer clothing or an exotic car. I believe we live in a world where material things are only a shell; we need to know the person before we can criticize. For someone like you who works in the Media, you have a duty to the public to be fair and square. I would have no problem if you had wrote this about a particular person you know and use this article as a friendly warning to all, however simply looking at a person’s appearance and so quickly judge, then to profile him/them into an so called MMV for you to smear in your little twisted article is just a poor and sad reflection on your personality.

      Nice one! I’d await your next article about people with chopping down the tall poppy syndrome, or women who are gold diggers or better yet Would Jesus have judged people before he knows them?

    • Hey You says:

      08:15pm | 01/07/09

      Ooh ooh ooh ooh Jacqui Blue. Or you make me ... I am trying to figure-out where I fit in Jacqueline’s stereotyped world of older man and exposure to, gulp, women. I had a lovely ” name ” watch my parents gave me for my 21st but Infantry life of Viet Nam vintage kinda killed it. Then came children, civvy career scramble and mortgages and all that stuff and I just managed to eke out an anti-glam existence with a series of Casios and Seikos.

      No matter, they were accurate, reliable and utiltarian. At the new millenium, I splashed-out on a gold and titanium number that set me back only a couple of grand but I like the way it looks and it works well in the extreme. Personally, I find so-called performance cars boring and SLOW!

      All my life I have ridden for pleasure on big, fast motorcycles - not Harleys and their horrible cruiser ilk - really FAST sports bikes. Nary a tassel or tattoo to be seen. Well into my 60’s and still running full marathons and doing gym and weights work, I don’t need Viagra and have a GREAT sex life, even after 41 years married to the same woman. Jacqueline, what’s wrong with me, You gotta tell me, please?

    • so so says:

      09:14pm | 01/07/09

      I agree with Udi. An article about how beautiful she is followed by an article about how well travelled she is and how many rich people she knows…
      I appreciate the satire and the article in general, but less talking yourself up next time?

    • Harry says:

      10:58am | 02/07/09

      It is so True Jacqueline,
      I quess I better go and sell my aeroplane now. Remember the red one ZS-MII. It might just buy me a Rolex.

    • Susie says:

      10:58am | 02/07/09

      Well today’s piece got plenty of comment!!! Divided opinions too, well done!
      At least you are getting people to think.

    • Rodri says:

      10:59am | 02/07/09

      Hi babe. Loved todays column, so true and well said

    • Peter F says:

      11:00am | 02/07/09

      Brilliant!  I just read all the comments too.  Too funny.

    • Martin G says:

      11:04am | 02/07/09

      Are we there yet? Have I made it monetarily? Can you see that i’m a success. So hilarious that some of the blokes commenting seem fixated on Jaqueline’s brutal yet honest and funny observations. She’s not cutting down anyone in tall poppy syndrome at all. She’s written a comedy skit just like the old Fast Forward or caracicatures. Keep it up and don’t let the wowsers keep you down.

    • Hamish Mc says:

      12:39pm | 02/07/09

      Common fellas, when was the last time you had a good long laugh like this one? Ms Pascarl hasn’t written a highbrow factaul article, she has written a comedic and generalised observation piece. She’s not even saying that she hates plain and expensive watches - she has given voice to a joke. Get a sense of humor Udi and So so!

    • M Mitchell says:

      12:42pm | 02/07/09

      YES! i totally don’t get it with men & xpensive watches… i see the ads in the qantas mag and think WTF it tells the time

    • Jason says:

      05:03pm | 02/07/09

      I have a 1980 toyota celica and a $150 watch so by deduction either I’m the worlds greatest lover, or I paid my own way through flying school.

    • Jacqueline Pascarl says:

      05:03pm | 02/07/09

      Not tall poppy bashing at all, just comedic poking at a ‘type’ in carcicature. Kudos to those who have goal & work hard to achieve what they want. However, if any person has had a personality by-pass, or pins their entire worth or attractiveness on the trappings of vulgar consumerism then point them gently to this article. NB:  It should be noted that I DID NOT point to Gold Rolex watches, or run of the mill timepieces, but took direct aim at DIAMOND studded and crystal embedded models - a distinct difference in the taste category - Mercedes Sports & convertible BMWs were also absent from the list! Rest easy those who are now hiding key chains all over OZ!

    • Jacqueline Pascarl says:

      07:41pm | 02/07/09

      Hey Ben Payne,
      So pleased for you to hear that you and your penis have remained a couple since puberty - you should try making it a threesome with another person sometime.  But I digress, you stated that a car has no bearing whatsoever and cannot change the size of a man’s penis - I beg to disagree.
      Gentlemen, I give you the Auto Suck - guaranteed to make your driving experience arrestable if you happen to be in a convertible.
      http://www.freddyandeddy.com/productreviews/wis/autosuckproductreview.htm
      Also, not a penis fixation at all, just suspect I have seen more of them up really close than you have, unless you want to share anything?  and no, my encounters did not involve any financial considerations.

    • Jacqueline Pascarl says:

      07:55pm | 02/07/09

      To “Hey You”, nothing seems to be discernibly wrong with you at all. i say all power to you if you’ve served your country and love your woman - have a happy life and may you and yours do WHATEVER makes you happy as long as it doesn’t involve firearms, woodland creatures or dismemberment. PS: seems your new watch is sans diamonds, but then I suspect you are one in the rough!

    • Jacqueline Pascarl says:

      08:00pm | 02/07/09

      Dear Realto, congrats on stil having all your own hair - my husband has hair, but none on his head. Cycle on and save the planet - I salute you O Great man of good sense and discreet tastes.  Thank you for pedalling past my column.

    • Jacqueline Pascarl says:

      08:05pm | 02/07/09

      Dear Peter Thornton,
      Thank you for sharing your member’s condition with the rest of Australia and myself. May I draw your attention to the fact that there is a law about that sort of thing?  And yes, I do love a car that rattles.

    • Jacqueline Pascarl says:

      08:11pm | 02/07/09

      Dear Peter_Griffin, Ah, a gentleman of discretion and impeccable taste - begone nasty bling bling blighters.  I commend your choice of understated ,yet perilously expensive Tag Heur timepiece and point you also towards IWC - both are equally known to connoissuers. One should note that upon her marriage, France’s first lady, Carla Bruni, consigned Sarkozy’s diamond studded Rolex to the back of the sock drawer.

    • Henry says:

      08:32pm | 02/07/09

      Hysterically funny article! Amazed that some people take it seriously. Just lighten up and stop looking at the car magazines. You’ll go blind.

    • Bill Oakleigh says:

      10:27pm | 02/07/09

      When an old guy is trawling for trash in the cesspits of society the best bait is a Rolex and red sports car. You don’t think a swatch and Toyota prius would cut the mustard?

    • Jacqueline Pascarl says:

      09:57am | 03/07/09

      Dear Ben Oakleigh,
      Your choice of a Toyota Prius and a Swatch shows a deep concern for future generations and means you a a thinking woman’s type of crumpet try dangling your key chain at Art Galleries, Film Festivals and cafe’s serving Freetrade Coffee Blends. Dijon anyone?

    • Andrew says:

      05:05pm | 03/07/09

      Excuse me ma’am, could you give me the time?
      I don’t want to miss my bus.

    • Peter Thornton says:

      09:47am | 06/07/09

      Dear Jacqueline:

      Afraid I’m c*&k-blocking you, eh? Never mind…

      - PT

    • Daniel says:

      04:03pm | 29/07/09

      If true I can only imagine this also applies to women who spend big on earrings and shoes.  Let’s not be sexist here - I guess they have over-large orifice down below. 

      I doubt the world is that simple - unless that is all you can hold in that space above your decorated neck.

      (please don’t let this website get as pathetic as the one it’s linked from)

    • Dr Tina Gonzalez says:

      11:22pm | 29/07/09

      I’m sorry but I object to your artice, it seems a little immature. You’re stating any man with a nice car has a small penis. Don’t you have anything of substance to write about or are you just trying to get a reaction. My husband drives a $130,000 GTR and I can tell you, he’s amazing in bed. Maybe you’re a little bit jealous of the women with these men, I live in million dollar home and drive my own luxury vehicle, I have an amazing sex life and my husband is wonderful, in fact speaking of my husband, he just drove up the drive way….

    • Melissa McDonald says:

      11:36pm | 29/07/09

      Upon reading you’re profile I was looking forward to your articles, unfortunately I won’t be reading another one. I want my two minutes back, this article was complete rubblish. Can you please find something real and interesting to write about? The world is crying out for some good journalists, yet you keep churning out these pathetic articles ie about the size of men’s penises. This article shows a clear lack of experience and you are simply trying to get reactions from men, sounds like you’re aquite a lonely girl that may have had a bad experience with a man in a nice car? Am I right or am I right?

    • Jamie says:

      01:16am | 30/07/09

      I really enjoyed the satire.
      But to be totally honest, and as a lower-income down-shifter who COULD have been driving one of those or wearing some piece of overstated bling if he’d had no morals:
      Most of them made that cash on the backs of other people - people LIKE ME who work 80+ hours a week for a 38 hr paycheck.
      Most of them don’t know what REAL work is - I had my last day off in April - I think thats pretty much illegal - even in the shadier parts of the globe.
      And finally - yeah - I’ve got some money, I’ve got 3 Vacheron watches and a Patek phillipe for my partner.
      They’re investments - portable wealth. I love watching these ageing roosters wearing theirs to the opera supported by a $5000 suit so they can sit IN THE DARK. heh.
      Most of my clothes I made myself. My brother hand made me a notebook that you can’t buy - but if you did the gold embossing and kimono silk lining would cost more than the watch.
      Bespoke is the new bling - and understated but unique is the new thing.
      I loved the article, but satire only works when it contains truth.
      Old roosters with small weenies charging down New South Head to make that lunch at Catalinas where they’ll carve up this place a little finer between themselves - shouldn’t we all be used to it by now?

    • Veronica says:

      04:04pm | 09/10/09

      I can’t believe our society is so messed up. We’re putting people down so badly, and trivialising sexuality, which is ‘i suspect’ not too uncommon in the journalist circles, as it is in mainstream society. Lets all just take from this the very truthful observation here: our wourld is WAY too materialistic.

    • John says:

      07:30am | 16/01/10

      She writes this dribble and makes fun of men because she is trying to stirke back at all men with nice cars. She was probably sumped by a guy who had a nice vehicle and just like most women scorned she wants to take it out on the entire gender. Ooops did I make a generlization about all women because of the actions of this one oh my sorry ladies. I wonder how an article printed about how women who wear open and revealing tops describes them all as whores who want men to look at them and then get mad when they do would be recieved by the female community???? Or that oversized rock on her hand that creams I am a gold digger and he has to pay big $$$ to ohave what I got???  hmmm probably not to good.

    • Jacqueline Pascarl says:

      04:54pm | 23/02/10

      Dear John, At 18,  first cars were a Ferrari, a Porsche, a BMW and a Rolls Royce Phantom - it that general enough for you in the vehicle area, and it’s the honest truth!  And if you need to know, I have had failed relationships with 3 BMW drivers, a Hyundai driver and a man who had a royal fleet at his disposal.  I recently refused the offer of a high end 4 x 4 from my husband and stuck to my old Toyota Tarago - old money doesn’t care about added extras and prestige vehicles - that’s for the crass nouveau riche. Actually, if you look at my past columns you will see that I also lambasted too much botox and other desperate measures by women. By the way, have you ever looked up the definition of ‘satire’ and comedy?  When I want to seriously research an article on horsepower and the proleteriat, and write review motor vehicles for a magazine I’ll contact you for comments. Until then, I’ll stick to satirical social commentary and my general writing.

    • Don says:

      01:31pm | 02/07/10

      I’m sorry but most people reading this don’t take it as satire. Poking fun is one thing, to point out a whole gender that drives flashy cars and wear expensive watches are impotent, and are useless human beings because of that fact or size of their organ is sexist. A couple of the posters were correct you don’t make the correlation that a woman that an older women is compensating when she wears expensive clothes, jewelry, gets her hair died, a boob job. She apparently must have an enormous Vagina and sagging breasts that no one wants to get near or in. Sorry but the botox comment isn’t the same, when you attack an entire gender for their age, appearance, size of their sexual organs, etc. it’s not a satire. Its sexism and in the media it’s gone on far too long with men. Saying such things about women is not kind, it would draw a negative outpouring from society, but when its men….it seems were fair game to ridicule. These same men provided for their families, fight your wars to keep you safe and preserve your comfortable freedoms, etc. Why is it ok for the media to portray us as fumbling bumbling idiots? I think its time society learns to respect their men for being men, the good they do, not portray them as outcasts to poke fun at. Feminism has pushed this image of men for the past 30 years and its doing more harm to marriages and families than good. These same men you make fun of for being bald, wearing expensive jewelry, being impotent, having small sexual organs….I guess their just throw always ladies. We don’t talk about our women it this fashion…please don’t portray men in this fashion. No…Most people don’t take this as satire…. I’m sorry. It shows total disregard for men in general,

      To sum up our journalist’s intent in her article here ladies and gentleman, if you find a middle age man, bald, driving an expensive car, wearing an expensive watch. It’s given, he is probably impotent (ED), has a small sexual organ (God forbid). Pass these men by for they are definitely losers and don’t deserve love from any of you. Please send out your next article describing for us men how women who dye their hair, go to beauty salons, buy expensive jewelry, handbags and shoes are in the same category so we can discuss their inadequacies, they must all have huge vaginas, drooping breasts, a fat rear end and we should all ridicule them in everyday media and point out that they don’t deserve love….so all men should avoid them and make fun of them….your pathetic to write dribble like this…...IT’S SEXIST.

    • Jerry says:

      11:43am | 27/06/11

      I must say this is an awesome article. I bet these men don’t get their hands dirty! Real men don’t eat quiche!

      Jerry
      http://www.carid.com

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

RT @gregprichard: The Victorian Sports Minister has just sent the New Zealand Prime Minister a commiserative email. #stateoforigin

Anthony Sharwood

@VanillathunderV fair comeback. But seriously, if that was a try then I'll book my skiing in Queensland this year

Anthony Sharwood

@BrettS69 the loveliest thing about post-origin is the sledges from gloating qlders #ratherbeagoodloserthanapoorwinner

Anthony Sharwood

That is the video referee howler to end all howlers to end all howlers to end all howlers to end all howlers #stateoforigin

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Lying on a cold table in an unfamiliar place and undergoing a core biopsy was probably one of the most…

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

Red alert, ladies. Making jokes about your ability at work is not funny particularly at board level.…

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Punishing the baddies is only fun in the movies. In real life it’s messy, expensive, and fraught…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter