Like the proverbial frog dropped into cold water and boiled slowly, we have grown accustomed to paying people to twist the truth.

Cartoon: Jos Valdmann


Every now and then we have a little skirmish and a little outrage at just how much government spin doctors are paid, but overall it has become an intrinsic part of how information flows (or doesn’t flow) to the public.

Last week we saw the SA State Government, when all eyes, hearts and minds were on Christchurch, drop the news of cancer-causing chemicals in underground water - an issue the Environment Protection Authority knew about for a year and a half.

The timing could all be coincidence. Due process must be followed. A threat to public safety had to be ascertained (wouldn’t want to cause ``undue panic’’ by warning people before you have to). It has to go to Cabinet.

But people rightly questioned the timing because there is plenty of precedent for governments dropping bad news in the midst of disaster.

It happens on a smaller scale - damning reports get tabled after the Budget’s just been handed down, the last line of a press release on a busy news day contains a devastating statistic.
And on a larger scale - such as the famous incident after September 11 when a UK Labour spin doctor sent a memo saying it was a good day to bury bad news.

Coincidences happen. But more importantly and more insidiously, there are myriad everyday ways the Government is waging a war on the public’s access to information. These include:

  • Discrediting the journalists who are giving them the hardest time. Whispers start to do the rounds that this or that reporter is unstable, has lost the plot, has gone rogue, is making stuff up. It works. Rumours spread. That person then faces a constant battle to be taken seriously.
  • Discrediting the media outlet. In a recent radio interview Premier Mike Rann insinuated that the Sunday Mail had sent him some poll results - for a poll that hadn’t been conducted yet. It wasn’t true.
  • Bullying and verbal abuse are rife. Of course it is supposed to be a fairly robust atmosphere. But taxpayer money should not be spent on people who spend an inordinate amount of time spewing vitriol at journalists.
  • Making reporters doubt their stories. This can be as simple as ``That’s not a story. You’re going to look like an idiot’’ to the more complicated - ``The source of that story has a mental illness.’‘. For young reporters, it can be a tough call.

Then there are the misleading background briefings, the run around between departments and ministerial offices, the long wait for any kind of anodyne comment to be approved, the refusals to be interviewed, the blacklisting, the endless obfuscation and blocking people at every turn. 

There’s the refusal to answer questions, the tactic of not answering questions from newspaper journalists then going on radio with new information to savage them with the next day.

Not all spinners act like this - in fact it’s a minority. And not all journalists get the bullyboy treatment, and some say they’ve never even been verballed. But it’s a common experience for many.

We, the media, can be insular. But this point needs to be stressed: Spin is propaganda. The Governments - all of them - spend millions of your dollars trying to stop you from getting facts that do not agree with their sanctioned version.

29 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Erick says:

      04:46am | 01/03/11

      “Spin is propaganda.”  So is journalism. I see this fight as an internal power struggle between two factions of the gentry.

    • Tom says:

      08:20am | 01/03/11

      Well said. Propaganda is not only how you write something, it is what you choose to write about (eg “budgie smugglers” or “angry photos”) in preference to government competence). It is also what you choose not to write about (eg Malcolm Farr’s article on ANU and Howard the day after Gillards carbon tax bombshell). The list goes on.

      I think journos get their jollies from swaying the dumb ignorant masses. It makes them feel important. I like your “factions of the gentry” phrase.

    • Faz says:

      09:34am | 01/03/11

      Agreed Erick.

      This is pot calling kettle black territory.

    • Shifter says:

      11:23am | 01/03/11

      @Eric(k) - Problem is on the government’s side the spinners are paid for by tax dollars.

      @Tom - It does help if you enjoy your job smile

    • Erick says:

      01:55pm | 01/03/11

      @Shifter - Check out this little thing called the ABC some time - costing $700,000,000 taxpayers dollars every year, last time I checked.

    • iansand says:

      06:13am | 01/03/11

      What would happen if reporters started dropping a couple of pars at the end of each story detailing the crap they have been put through?  The SMH used to have a weekly column from their FOI flak telling stories from the murky world of FOI.  It was always interesting.

    • bobw says:

      08:04am | 01/03/11

      I like your thinking, iansand.  Politicians (and their minions) are unlikely to be embarrassed into disowning obfuscatory or intimidatory tactics by mere generalised complaints.

    • Tory Shepherd

      Tory Shepherd says:

      10:16am | 01/03/11

      That’s been a hot topic of discussion - the interwebby opens up a whole world of possibilities. We could post the audio of the interview, a timeline, etc… right now we don’t really have the resources… but I think it’s a great idea.

    • acotrel says:

      06:39am | 01/03/11

      There is something about indoctrination which everyone should know. - If you are aware it is happening to you, it is not effective!  The worry is that people believe what’s written in newspapers, and what appears on TV.  People like Rupert Murdoch thus have inordinate, and undue power in our democracy. You could argue that journos are custodians of the truth, but the question is always ‘who guards the guards?’  The major influence on what they write nust always be primarily, the effect on their own careers of the content!

    • Rev says:

      08:02am | 01/03/11

      I’m more concerned that the price of tin foil will increase with a carbon tax.

    • Tom says:

      12:17pm | 01/03/11

      Acca, the majority of us might be aware it is happening to us, but the kicker is that 20 swingers in a marginal electorate might not. Hence our constant surprise at the lcd pitch undertaken by the spin doctors. Kevin 07’s “buy them a plasma TV” GFC stunt worked a treat and I am sure you have a ready supply of anecdotes about your best mate, JWH.

    • acotrel says:

      05:34pm | 01/03/11

      @Tom. Is that worse than the people who were sucked in by the kids overboard bullshit?  Or the lies about Aborigines getting into pornography? - Something which was obviously included to ward of criticism by true christians in the Liberal Party! Australians fall for the three card trick, over, and over, and over again!

    • MarK says:

      07:05am | 01/03/11

      And then you have chief political reporters that don’t report on the political news of the day. You know…..the stuff in front of them.

      Go figure.

    • Margymay says:

      08:28am | 01/03/11

      ‘Discrediting the journalists who are giving them the hardest time. Whispers start to do the rounds that this or that reporter is unstable, has lost the plot, has gone rogue, is making stuff up. It works. Rumours spread. That person then faces a constant battle to be taken seriously.’

      While I have no doubt all of this stuff happens to journos I would say that politicians can find themselves on the receiving end just as much.  Spin Doctors don’t have a monopoly on wily.

    • nossy says:

      08:40am | 01/03/11

      Shameful stuff that spin Tory - I never engage in it ! hahahah   heres some examples of spin from an ABC article :
      “The mea culpa: Perfected by Queensland’s Peter Beattie, the politician will take full responsibility for a bad decision, promise that “heads will roll’’ and that it will be fixed. They will then hope the issue disappears, and is not raised again.
      The diversionary tactic: Announce something to divert attention away from something less politically palatable. For example, a major new cigarette branding initiative could take attention off a delayed emissions trading scheme promise. Or a state government, reeling from a health crisis where nurses and doctors aren’t being paid, capitulate and announce a review of daylight saving, by Twitter. You’re likely to find examples like these every week, in all levels of government.
      It’s all in the language: Whether it’s the Working Family or WorkChoices, so much depends on the words chosen.
      The greed card: This is played when a politician tries to make us feel bad that we might not be carrying our share of the burden. Example: miners make too much money, they’re foreign, and you miss out.
      The missing transcript: Politicians often put a transcript of their interviews on the internet, or hand them out so that they can be re-quoted by other organisations. Unless of course the interview goes badly. Then sometimes, the transcript just seems to disappear.
      Pick your day syndrome: This is widely played by politicians from all parties - from Kevin Rudd focusing on media appearances more commonly at the end of the week (when polling companies are in the field) to the release of bad news (often on a Friday night) or good news on Sundays and public holidays when there is less competition to head the bulletin. The release of the Henry report is another example. Despite it not being market sensitive, it was cloaked in a secret Sunday lock-up - something the Government’s response certainly didn’t justify.
      It’s not personal, it’s just me: All politicians have their own little ways to help them sell their message, from the tie they pick to the magazine they choose to spill the beans. It goes further than that too. Former prime minister John Howard often breathed mid-sentence which made getting a question in difficult; Kevin Rudd often asks - and then answers - his own questions.
      Tell the partial truth This happens often. You ask a question and a specific answer is given, but not the whole answer. A recent Queensland example involves the death of a toddler after the flu vaccine. After dozens of cases of ill children in Western Australia, the Queensland Government denied there were any cases in Queensland. When it was caught out, a minister explained they were not officially told of the death, and it was too early to tell whether it was a result of the flu vaccine.
      Blame the public servant: This is an increasing spin mechanism, where a government will put up a public servant, rather than the minister, to answer questions. That means the bad press is directed at the public service, not the Government.
      The drip feed: You’ll hear part of what a health or police or education package will be today, more next week, and certainly more come election time. Why deliver the one big package which would show you the big picture, when there can be three bites of the cherry? A twist on this is the half report, where a minister will leak part of a document which shows a government in good light. A good journalist should always ask for the full report, because it’s likely the second half will have something damaging to the government.
      Saved by the review: Used by all parties, the “send it to a review’’ technique gets it out of the public debate. This means any issue that is too hard to deal with can be subject to a review or an inquiry, until it’s raised again, or at least until after the election.
      The picture opportunity: John Howard out walking. Tony Abbott in lycra. Your local politician on the front page of the paper, shirts rolled up, serving soup at a homeless kitchen. Often, it’s just staged, but it certainly can change how you perceive them.
      The human touch: A variation on the above, with the best example highlighted by former treasurer Peter Costello’s macarena dance on daytime TV. You’ll see a lot more of this in coming weeks, when politicians drag out whole families to colour their image.
      The social media blitz: Do you really think all politicians are doing their own twittering? Sure some are, but others have no idea who they’re following, as evidenced by revelations the Prime Minister is following a porn star.
      The phony sacking: No government wants to give an Opposition a ministerial notch on their belt, so the phony sacking allows responsibility to be removed from a minister, without them being removed. Remember Peter Garrett?”

    • nihonin says:

      09:37am | 01/03/11

      Brilliant ‘arctile’ nossy, absolutely brilliant.

    • nihonin says:

      09:42am | 01/03/11

      Oops it should have been ‘article’.

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      09:43am | 01/03/11

      nossy.  Had a good laugh this morning about Rudd speeches and interviews about Gadafi. I.e. it’s time to go, everyone wants you to go, please just go ...

      Where did he learn that from?  God bless.

      Pollies can be so cute when they’re not being scary.

      Oh and I wear speedos when I do laps. But mine fit. Maybe Tony needs a tri-suit?  Although Matt Shirvington copped some negativity for his green number.  Arrgh. What to do?

    • Tom says:

      10:12am | 01/03/11

      Brilliant post.

    • Likes Joining Dots says:

      10:43am | 01/03/11

      Nossy - good post

      Of course you know this means trouble for me,  I’m now going to have to once again read your comments in the future - curse you

      cheers LJD

    • nossy says:

      11:31am | 01/03/11

      @Squeeze the Middle - yes my sources in the middle east tell me that Gaddafi when he heard of Ruddy’s ultimatum was “overcome with fear and emotion” !  hahahaahahahah

    • acotrel says:

      05:29pm | 01/03/11

      @Nossy.  It doesn’t matter how many times you slander Peter Garrett, anyone who’s ever worked in a real job knows he was never responsible for performing Job Safety Analyses.  That was the task of the GRUB contractors!

    • Nathan says:

      09:16am | 01/03/11

      “Discrediting the media outlet”

      I think the Sunday Mail does a pretty good job of doing that all on it’s own.

    • mary says:

      09:29am | 01/03/11

      Thanks Tory. We rely on our journos to get us the background stories and insights that we don’t have access to. We need you guys to keep our governments accountable. To show us the spin we miss. That’s why we love you.

      To be honest I don’t know how you cope with the flak you cop from all sides. I’m hanging my head in shame for the times I had a go.

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      09:30am | 01/03/11

      The word Spin itself is spin. It’s a rebranding of words like mislead, dupe, deceive, trick, con and propaganda. Don’t like the word being used to define you or your trade?  Invent a new one. (It’s almost always a big game of front running)

      Perhaps a slap in the polls is needed to break their pattern of behaviour. For a couple of polls, vote independent. That’ll hit them where it hurts the most, their wallets. If that’s too scary then another option is to always vote the current government out. They’ll get the message within a handful of cycles.  I.e. we will create the fertile soil for conviction politicians. We have to break the cycle. And what difference will it make to your lives?

    • Brett Thorburn says:

      12:17pm | 01/03/11

      As we have the spiritaual master of spin residing in SA…little micky, should we not employ his talents to establish a master of spin university…as all other offshore unis are pulling out of old Adelaide??? There is a big market for these services in the Labor camp you know.

      So lets not lose this mans extreme talents to Puglia, dump the footy ground and build the Rann University of Spin…..to be accredited an MBS (master of bullshit)

    • Tator says:

      05:02pm | 01/03/11

      or a PhD (piled higher and deeper)

    • Johhn says:

      04:17pm | 01/03/11

      Hi Tory. Sadly some jounalists do poor work. Please dont defend them. You see there was no story at Edwardstown other than the EPA became aware of borewater contamination that might impact on bores some distance from the site. The EPA made it really clear what they knew and when. It is published on the EPA website! How hard can it be to do a proper investigation? I can read it and I believe the EPA - well before I would believe some journalist writing what appears to be fiction so he/she can get to be on page 1. Sadly the less the journalists seem hell bent on drumming up a story regardless of the truth. Then everyone thinks that it must be true so they all jump on the same band wagon. This desrves immense criticism and its no wonder people are no longer buying the Advertiser and Sunday Mail.

    • Dave C says:

      06:58pm | 01/03/11

      I have to agree with the author and Nossy, at a state level many ALP Govts (and the only reason I mention this is because for 5 years we had wall to wall ALP at state level) used the spin techniques mentioned by Nossy very well. I dont know if the Lib Govt in WA are doing it someone please tell me.

      Right around the country these Govts had likable personablt media savvy leaders like self confessed media Moll Beattie, Media Mike Rann and even the ex journo Carpenter in the West.

      The original, biggest and the best however was Bob Carr in NSW, the Daily Tele was always fed a media release of something interesting yet trivial by Carr/ALP headquarters when something bad occured to the government. It could be something like a new healthy diet policy in schools, a shake up (restructure) of a Govt body to make it look more accountable, a statement by Carr himself that he believes we revisist the republic or anything thats eaten up by the Tele and the other news outlets that means the Opposition have no oxygen and nothing bad is ever reported about the government. As a result the Govt is voted in AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN

      When the shit hits the fan however it is covered up, The best example, a damming report on the millions lost on the Sydney Cross City Tunnell was released.. wait for it on melbourne cup day at 3.00pm. 

      The there are the repeat announcements I work in education and every few years there would be a report in the tele of “new tougher discipline procedures in schools” its all horse shit, school discipline policies are if anything less tough. But that doesn’t stop the impression given by the NSW ALP spin doctors to the tele. The North West and South West rail links were announced 4 times in the 16 years of this NSW Govt, nothing has ever been built.

      The best media stunt ever by Carr was in 2003, the Lib leader at the time was putting pressure on him so Carr went to a pie shop and announced to the press that he hated Sausage Rolls and liked Meat pies, and yep you guessed thats what went to air on Nine and Seven News that night.

      The only thing is once people see through the lies they get angry… watch the result on 26th of March in NSW

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

RT @gregprichard: The Victorian Sports Minister has just sent the New Zealand Prime Minister a commiserative email. #stateoforigin

Anthony Sharwood

@VanillathunderV fair comeback. But seriously, if that was a try then I'll book my skiing in Queensland this year

Anthony Sharwood

@BrettS69 the loveliest thing about post-origin is the sledges from gloating qlders #ratherbeagoodloserthanapoorwinner

Anthony Sharwood

That is the video referee howler to end all howlers to end all howlers to end all howlers to end all howlers #stateoforigin

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Animal experiments won’t cure me from cancer

Lying on a cold table in an unfamiliar place and undergoing a core biopsy was probably one of the most…

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

If you want to get promoted, laugh at the boss’s jokes

Red alert, ladies. Making jokes about your ability at work is not funny particularly at board level.…

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Need someone to do your dirty work? Try God.

Punishing the baddies is only fun in the movies. In real life it’s messy, expensive, and fraught…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter