It is one of the great dangers of this new technological age that we are all potential victims of “computer hacking”.

We hacked Joe's computer and look what we found in the private folder

Computer hacking is an insidious and underhanded practice that infliltrates “computers”, which are like typewriters that you can play solitaire on.

The risks of hacking were brutally demonstrated in the 2007 documentary Die Hard 4.0, in which Bruce Willis spends two hours and eight minutes trying to send an email, only to give up and get someone from Generation Y to do it.

Yet despite this stark warning, many organisations have been left unprepared.

In the UK the News Corporation subsidiary News International was targeted by hackers who broke into The Sun’s website and started corrupting it with stories that weren’t about chicks with big bazoongas.

But tragically the carnage didn’t stop there. It has since come to my attention that hackers are operating everywhere.

For years now someone has been hacking into my Twitter account and inserting lame jokes about MasterChef.

Hackers have also been posing as a bunch of other Twitter users who send me messages that say things like “You’re not funny” and “I can’t believe you get paid to write this crap” and “Stop sending me those pictures of yourself or I’ll call the police”. All clearly fakes.

Likewise my Facebook account has clearly been tampered with. I have sent 87 friend requests to Megan Fox but it appears none of them has got through.

Not only that, there has been some definite interference with my Outlook account. For example, when I first came to Sydney I told my mother that I would write to her at least once a week but so far she has not received a single email.

It looks like I’m not the only victim either. Someone infiltrated Val Kilmer’s body and left 400kg of lard and someone hacked into Pirates of the Caribbean 4 and removed the plot, dramatic tension and character development.

And sometimes it’s not even the hacking itself that’s the problem. Once inside a system, a hacker can introduce something called a virus - which if left untreated can result in a hacking cough.*

In fact hacking is so widespread some people have even accused me of being a hacker, although they tend to use the shortened form “hack” which must be some kind of dialect native to the Inner West.

While it’s fair to say my keyboard skills are up there with Linda McCartney’s, I leave the high-tech stuff to our IT experts, who have a solution to every computer problem that can be solved by turning it off and then on again.

The problem is that once a rogue and uncontrollable foreign body enters even the most powerful organisation it can cause untold damage – although sadly this was discovered only after Andrew Wilkie was elected to Parliament.

*This is just a taste of the sort of jokes that can be found on my @Joe_Hildebrand Twitter feed.

Most commented

40 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Steve Putnam says:

      06:41am | 20/07/11

      I always suspected this guy had been abducted by aliens, and there you have it- photographic proof!

    • Gregg says:

      07:07am | 20/07/11

      ” We hacked Joe’s computer and look what we found in the private folder “
      But we don’t know what was being discussed!
      Any chance the funding is coming through for Crappy Movies I, II, III, IV and how many ever more the cast of Boganville and Mal & Monckton will provide laughs for Joe?

      But look, it does get close to home when you have wanna be nuisances on the punch being able to enter using your own ID.

    • Chris L says:

      08:49am | 20/07/11

      You don’t have to worry, Hollywood is turning away from making Crappy Movies I, II, III & IV. Now they’re fully invested into making Crappy Remakes I, II, III & IV.

    • Phil says:

      08:29am | 20/07/11

      “It is one of the great dangers of this new technological age that we are all potential victims of “computer hacking”

      No not all of us, just the stupid and those (individuals and companies) who dont take security (internet, data, personal info) seriously.

    • Joe Hildebrand says:

      11:59am | 20/07/11

      Good point Phil.

    • Peter says:

      08:33am | 20/07/11

      Last paragraph brilliant, Joe. It made me LOL.

    • Mouse says:

      08:34am | 20/07/11

      Well Joe, you’ve just been a great start to my day. lol Now I know that my kids do really love me and it’s the hackers’ fault that I haven’t been getting any emails from them! Maybe I will put them back on my Christmas list now. :oD

    • Eterio says:

      08:53am | 20/07/11

      this guy exposed the brutus brown political backstabbing conspiracy,lol

    • jay-ded says:

      09:13am | 20/07/11

      Droll.

    • cpill says:

      09:38am | 20/07/11

      sure sign you have nothing to say when all there is is you. Wonder where your next job will be.

    • Nicole @ myIdeaLife says:

      09:41am | 20/07/11

      Ok so you caught me - my hands are in the air - I promise to stop hacking into your twitter account and being hilariously funny….

    • BMJ says:

      09:51am | 20/07/11

      Typical News strategy.

      If another organisation did what NI did there would be daily attack pieces.

    • Richie says:

      10:50am | 20/07/11

      While this is clearly some of the most pathetic writing from one of Australia’s most useless “journalists”, it shows again the clear Limited News tactic of conservative victimisation. “In the UK the News Corporation subsidiary News International was targeted by hackers who broke into The Sun’s website and started corrupting it with stories that weren’t about chicks with big bazoongas.” Even though he is (trying) to be satirical, its clear that Limited News wants to emphasise the way they and their cause of conservatism are the ones being attacked by what’s perceived as a hostile and leftist society.

    • Joe Hildebrand says:

      12:00pm | 20/07/11

      Why is it that every time someone calls me a “journalist” they use those quote marks?

    • Richie says:

      01:14pm | 20/07/11

      Well it’s nothing particularly personal against you. The sheer concept that we have quality coherent and analytical “journalists” in Australia is false, (save perhaps Peter van Onselen).

    • The Badger says:

      02:20pm | 20/07/11

      Because Joe

      Everything you write about is coloured in your political ideology.
      As a result of this Joe, you are not a journalist, as a journalist provides real facts and a balanced view to articles they write regardless of their politics. A journalist can separate his political preferences from the issues he writes about.

      You Joe are an opinion writer in the style of a gossip columnist.

    • sylvie says:

      02:52pm | 20/07/11

      @The Badger
      The most pompous comment yet

      @Richie
      Peter van Oscillator?  You’re kidding

      @Joe Hildebrand
      Fools, hyenas -  everywhere

    • Babs says:

      05:00pm | 20/07/11

      Yeah I thought this piece was a bit lame - Joe, once I saw you on The Drum the other night talking over and ridiculing the other panellists when discussion of media concentration was raised, I realized you weren’t much of a thinker. Media concentration is a serious topic worthy of proper discussion in any democratic forum and you ought to know that there are problems when one organisation can get a strangle-hold on our elected representatives and influence policy through intimidation. I live in a state which has 100% Murdoch owned newspapers and has done for years.  This is the same state that once had a gerrymander so bad its citizens couldn’t get rid of a corrupt government for years either.  But the Murdochracy is losing its grip on power and it’s the usual Shakespearean story - hubris. It’s an old story, and kind of sad to watch. That doesn’t mean I’m not glad it’s all unravelling.

    • The righteous one says:

      11:12am | 20/07/11

      thats Joe’s mum, check the similarities around the eyes and the smile

    • Anna says:

      12:21pm | 20/07/11

      I know ...I thought the same thing…wow! who would have guessed. No wonder his emails didn’t get through. Actually, I don’t believe he ever sent them. Poor Joe, he must be so embarrassed.

    • Joe the Second says:

      11:35am | 20/07/11

      Brilliant :D I’ve been having a miserable day, so thank you for the lulz :D

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      11:48am | 20/07/11

      Wasn’t Andrew Wilkie elected as a result of the AEC’s (Australian Electoral Commission, dummy) Computer system being hacked?
      Someone removed the letters A.L.P from his CV & inserted the word “Independent” in order to fool the electors of the Federal Seat of Denison in Tasmania. Ah “Conspiracy Theories"don’t you just love them!

    • Steven Clark says:

      12:12pm | 20/07/11

      Actually we voted for Wilkie because that’s how a democracy works… 1 vote 1 person. Australians chose the current political representatives, each of us had that 1 democratic moment. So, as much as it may irk some who dislike the anti-gambling stance Wilkie takes, you don’t get 2 votes. Just 1. See you at the next election, after which everybody will complain again ad nauseum. I can’t remember any time we were all happy with politicians.

      However, the article was brilliantly written, witty and insightful. Almost poetic prose. Enjoyed it immensely for the tongue in cheek it was intended to be. Thanks, Joe.

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      01:12pm | 20/07/11

      Steven,
      Actually we don’t get “One Vote One Person”.Federally we operate under the “Preferential Voting System” which means if the person we vote for doesn’t get enough votes to win the seat our votes are passed over to another person or Party - indeed if the voting is very close those preferences can see someone or some party we would never vote for in a million years getting into Parliament.
      I have no problem with Wilkie’s Anti-Gambling stance it is the way he has, very publicly, threatened to bring down the Gillard Government if it does not pass his legislation.
      His threats were not simply the result of second- or third-hand reporting by biased journalists. Andrew was interviewed & it was during that interview, which was filmed & recorded, that he made his threat.
      The problem is that as we have a hung Parliament, the Gillard Government cannot Guarantee the passage of any legislation whatsoever.
      That being said it should be noted that, in amongst all the screeching by the leaders of all parties, the vast majority of all legislation presented to the Federal Parliament has been quietly, decently & rightfully passed with the Opposition voting in favour of it.
      Though the Greens hold the Balance of Power, this bi-partisan passing of most legislation will continue in spite of the wishes of the Greens.

    • Steven Clark says:

      02:05pm | 20/07/11

      Totally with you there Robert. But my point is still valid. WIlkie was elected by people in a globally accepted fair democratic election. You had your vote and I had my vote. That’s what a democracy is… a lot of people are under the phurphy that a democracy offers more. Really it doesn’t. And I voted for Wilkie because no party would address the gambling industry exploitation of the vulnerable as a cash cow income stream. Similarly, Australians in a fair election voted exactly for a Greens balance of power due to having both major parties being perceived as falling short of what a large proportion of us want for this country.

      I think much of the political discussion at present is looking at 2 party preferred… but it then takes a big jump to convert those 2pp figures into a mass conversion away from green and independent representation at an election in the future. One tax issue doesn’t negate all the other niche and focus issues that inspired their Green / Independent votes at the last election. So that fight to convert the substantial wavering vote will be an interesting thing to watch over the next year or so. But they’re there because democracy put them there… validly… in a fair election.

      Like many of those people I’ll be deciding at that time and on a number of issues relevant to my worldview.

    • melle says:

      03:43pm | 20/07/11

      @Steven Clerk,  Why anyone would vote for an Independent, because of gambling, is a mystery.  “exploitation of the vulnerable…”?
      No one is forced, kicking and screaming to a poker machine.
      People have to deal with their addictions.
      Wilkie’s all about Wilkie

    • Mongrielle says:

      12:30pm | 20/07/11

      What I like about the whole newshackery is that it shows conspiracy might not be only a theory.  Even paranoids have enemies.  Or if complete deadshits maybe they have enemas.  Either way try being involved in family law horrors if ya want to test out theories about electronic mugging hacking and general bugg..ing

    • Mark G says:

      12:35pm | 20/07/11

      Computer hacking has less of an effect on society than what most people are led to believe. What are they really hacking here. A news sites to put funny stories on? Twitter? Facebook? personal computers? Is that really the end of society as we know it. What about the CIA. Hacker have recently tried to claim that they hacked the CIA. uummm no they hacked the CIA website. That is not the CIA and anyone who things it is, is quite frankly a little stupid. The CIA website is a Public Relations site set up by the CIA mostly as a place to put declassified documents on. The securities precautions are only that of your average website because they don’t have to be anything more. The CIA does not work ON THE INTERNET. They are on stand alone secure networks. Companies like Wikileaks dont get their classified documents by hacking the internet. They get them by one of two ways. By putting gathering devices on the secure networks. This is very rare as it is very difficult to achieve particularly if you are talking about the CIA as it involves break and enter into facilities. The second is paying (or blackmailing) insiders to copy the documents and hand them over. This is how Wikileaks got most of the Afghan files.

      Banks can be a problem these days because they have a need to interface with the internet for customer convenience. But to hack anything more than single personal accounts is very difficult (as it should be). Single account hacks are mostly due to individuals not taking security seriously and keeping PIN numbers with cards ect. Larger bank hacks are very rare as is the number of people who get away with it. Causing ATMs to fail or bank sites to crash doesn’t mean that you have hacked the bank. It just means that you have attacked the interface. This has some effects (such as ATMs dishing out cash) but none that cant be resolved. These hacks are more inconvenient than dangerous.

      The reality is that most hacking (like the LULZ idiots) is nothing more than a pathetic ego driven attempt at fame and has no overall effect on society as a whole.

    • Aaron Fornarino says:

      01:09pm | 20/07/11

      Joe Hildebrand claims that hackers have invaded his Twitter account and posted statements that are ‘all clearly fakes’. I’ll take your word for it Joe.

    • stephen says:

      02:04pm | 20/07/11

      Yeah but who’s the bloke ?

    • Brad says:

      02:37pm | 20/07/11

      You could do worse Joe?

    • John Smythe says:

      02:49pm | 20/07/11

      tough crowd tonight, huh?

      I thought it was a good light hearted break from the usual pieces on here smile

      Would you prefer “Joe” the Journalist?

    • cpill says:

      03:42pm | 20/07/11

      or the other option, no Joe at all.

    • Seanr says:

      04:54pm | 20/07/11

      Definite tough crowd, I thought it was amusing.

    • ausspud says:

      03:36pm | 20/07/11

      Good article joe,some light-hearted banter and people still bitch and moan.
      Geez.

    • stockinbingal roo says:

      04:55pm | 20/07/11

      Liberal voters…
      I have a large spoon…

    • Justin says:

      04:10pm | 20/07/11

      Twitter is old news Joe, get on Plurk and I’ll become a fan. The premise is similar, the execution light years apart.

    • SimpleSimon says:

      04:32pm | 20/07/11

      I LOL’d. Particularly enjoyed the footnote.

      I’m amused by the perception that what the UK journo “hackers” did was something clever! The lax approach to remote voicemail security in the UK sees providers regularly issuing devices/accounts with default passwords of “1234” - and who ever changes the password for remote accessing their voicemail?! How hard is that to crack…

    • Sleepless says:

      06:46pm | 20/07/11

      “The problem is that once a rogue and uncontrollable foreign body enters even the most powerful organisation it can cause untold damage – although sadly this was discovered only after Andrew Wilkie was elected to Parliament.”

      You made me cry with that comment.  It’s a good thing that I’m not going out tonight or how would I have explained why i was crying? lol

    • Norm says:

      11:23am | 21/11/11

      Very true! Makes a change to see somenoe spell it out like that. smile

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter