When Tony Abbott last month stomped around a military base in Afghanistan in bomb disposal kit he looked more like an over-cautious beekeeper than a man of daring deeds.

First big new idea for the Action Man: better armour

But Abbott cannot be underrated for political boldness and dismissal of caution. His Action Man style has for the past 12 months allowed the Gillard government little time for rest or applause.

But now Tony Abbott is foreshadowing a switch from the relentless and restless tactics to a more settled period of policy creation. Twice in the past seven days he has pointed to extra effort in the contest of policy ideas, while still harassing the Government.

“The relative weighting” of Opposition priorities changes through the three year term of office, Abbott told Sky News yesterday, and one could expect that “being a credible alternative bulks just as large as holding the Government to account” in the coming year.

“I don’t think any of us ought to predict that this government is likely to last two years,” he said. “It may, it may not. We have to be ready for whatever happens.”

The objective is perfectly reasonable, but there is no certainty that Abbott, by far one of the most interesting characters in Australian politics along with Kevin Rudd, can settle himself to the task.

Abbott rightly argues the Opposition has come up with a welter of policy ideas, but in many cases they have been ideas designed to torpedo the Government’s rival proposals.

There is a significant distance between policy generated primarily out of a political strategy and policy presented because it is the best thing to do.

So the Coalition is now committed to an expensive parental leave scheme involving a tax rise, and to increasing pensions without using money raised by carbon pricing, because that made life harder for the Government.

This is policy skirmishing, not considered policy creation, and reflects Abbott’s action man political persona. He would rather keep launching raids on the Government’s climate change and asylum seeker positions than stay still for a moment to push well-formed Coalition policies on, for example, small business.

Always the action man. 

That small walk-on costume part in the bomb disposal clobber would have been satisfying for Abbott. It addressed a need in his personality, as did firing off a few rounds on a previous visit.

The Opposition Leader has a deep-seated yearning for exposure to danger that tests his manliness. He would like to be a Churchillian combination of soldier, journalist and political leader.

He’s been a journalist, is now a party leader, but hasn’t put his life on the line in a gun battle against an evil enemy.

The closest he has come to that recently was a few weeks ago when he visited a building site for another carbon pricing political raid and waved a nail gun around in a mock threat to journalists.

Perhaps he thought there was a chance no jury would convict if he impaled just a few hacks.

Abbott’s ambition to go on patrol with Special Forces in Afghanistan, embedded like a reporter, has been discouraged by military authorities, and he has felt the disappointment.

But if he is looking for mighty deeds to accomplish he might start with an Opposition economic policy that adds up, and a certain amount of boldness on the workplace relations front.

199 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Erick says:

      05:05am | 12/12/11

      Action Man versus Incompetent Girl? There could be a potential comic strip in this ...

    • Sony B Goode says:

      06:53am | 12/12/11

      the only thing that matters is 57-43

    • Super D says:

      07:10am | 12/12/11

      Action Man AND Incompetent Girl could be the greatest crime fighting duo since Angel Summoner and BMX Bandit joined forces.

    • Horns Up says:

      08:11am | 12/12/11

      Action Man is made of plastic and hollow inside.

      \m/

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      08:22am | 12/12/11

      Lol made me laugh.

      Nothing would ever get achieved, Action Man would say ‘NO’ to every idea, and Incompetent Girl would stuff up every plan.

    • Damocles says:

      08:40am | 12/12/11

      Der, good one HU, musta taken a long time to thunk that one up…...real clever stuff. Now get back to yer comics.

    • Blind Freddy says:

      09:13am | 12/12/11

      How about “Gillard” and “Anti-Gillard”? One spends all of their time going around doing useful things and the other one runs around after them undoing it all.

      And around and around it goes . . .

    • Horns Up says:

      09:59am | 12/12/11

      Der good1 Damocles. U speak good n stuff. Now back to yer crayons.

      \m/

    • Peter says:

      10:27am | 12/12/11

      Sneer all you like, Erick, but the “Incompetent Girl” line is wearing thin.  She has chocked up a lot of successes in a row.  She’s moving into a stronger position, while he is weakening.  He has a crap team, no ideas and has lost his momentum.  Meanwhile she is moving from strength to strength.  But of course “its the worst government in Australia’s history”, right?  Lol.

    • Mars says:

      11:13am | 12/12/11

      Tony Abbott is just a “yes"man:

      Yes to transparency
      Yes to truth
      Yes to commitment
      Yes to decency
      Yes to respect
      Yes to equality
      Yes to progress

      But most of all Tony says a big YES to honesty.

    • Erick says:

      11:27am | 12/12/11

      @Peter - Going from catastrophic to disastrous is an improvement, but I don’t see it in quite the rosy terms that you do.

    • Felipe says:

      11:35am | 12/12/11

      Peter,  you have obviously not read the latest Nielson poll which states Labor primary is 29% and 2PP is Coalition at 57 and Labor at 43.  Also Tony Abbott back leading best PM role at 46 and Gillard at 42.  I just feel that the media is zeroing in on Tony Abbott see K Murphy’s article and M Farr’s.  All about negativity, when in fact they are absorbing all the bile being thrown out by Albanese e.g.  “noalition” and no, no , no in parliament licensed by Gillard who always disappear when Tony Abbott wants a debate.  The first PM who in her arrogance leaves the floor of parliament and let Albanese her attack dog to do the job for her.  This Labor negative propaganda does not work because we the voters can distinguish a bad policy from a good policy and carbon tax, Malaysian solution and the error filled mining tax are BAD policies.  Gillard’s decision to put Slipper in the Speaker’s chair is bad, bad, bad. Peter Slipper does not have a clean skin and for that , I hope it is this Gillard decision that will bring her down in the near future. Election please!!!

    • Blind Freddy says:

      11:47am | 12/12/11

      @Mars

      You forgot “yes” to apple pie and mum.

      Oh, and “yes” to “no”

    • Alf says:

      01:20pm | 12/12/11

      Abbott is just getting ready. He is about to put a bomb under Gillard’s arse. Kaaabooooom!!!

    • Nilbog says:

      01:31pm | 12/12/11

      57 - 43

    • Shooter says:

      02:24pm | 12/12/11

      57-43 and still lost

    • Rick of the Dustbowl says:

      04:02pm | 12/12/11

      quick sideshow ....to the bee mobile

    • JasmiNe says:

      07:16pm | 12/12/11

      @ Mars -

      “Tony Abbott is just a “yes"man:

      Yes to transparency
      Yes to truth
      Yes to commitment
      Yes to decency
      Yes to respect
      Yes to equality
      Yes to progress

      But most of all Tony says a big YES to honesty.”

      You have to be kidding!  I felt seriously ill reading that.  Tony Abbott stands for non of that - open your eyes man! lol People are so unbelievably brainwashed by Abbott’s vile spiels and not seeing his own lies and manipulation.

    • BMJ says:

      06:03am | 12/12/11

      I understand that Abbott has been negative and he needs to change that at some time. However the Rudd/Gillard Government has been so bad, so incompetent that only a fool would pass up the opportunity to use the issues you mentioned to their advantage.

    • dale says:

      06:06am | 12/12/11

      While you are at it with the big bag of ideas

      Remember to remind people EVERY coalition vote is a conscious vote

      Remember to remind all coalition members the vote on gay marriage is not a conscious vote and they must vote his way.

    • KH says:

      06:07am | 12/12/11

      If there was an intelligent question in there you might get some.

    • Against the Man says:

      06:45am | 12/12/11

      Now KH you have just given an unintelligent response. Thanks for playing, please join Gillard in the loser line, I expect more of your ‘peers’ will be joining you soon. Year end victory for ATM is pretty sweet wink

    • gobsmack says:

      06:50am | 12/12/11

      @AtM
      You’re not the editor of the Australian by any chance?

    • Joan says:

      07:15am | 12/12/11

      Dale:  Remember both Gillard and Abbott went to 2010 election promising to maintain Marriiage Act as is - between man and woman.  Abbott Liberals have kept their word -  Gillard Labor has not kept its word,. Lies lies, lies and more lies by Labor. Labor has no conscience.

    • john says:

      07:49am | 12/12/11

      @dale"conscious vote”

      Just a friendly reminder you can’t have a conscious vote if you have no consciousness in a dictatorship.

    • Eric The Red says:

      08:16am | 12/12/11

      Good idea for Dr No,
      1. Remind us that you have no Policies.
      2. Remind us how when you were in Giovernment how you ripped Billions from the health budget.
      3. Remind us how you loved Workchoices and still do Tones.
      4. Remind us how you will pay the big polluters and hit working families with a $1,300 a year tax to pay for it, Thanks.
      5. Remind us how you voted against the offshore processing, now it’s on you Abbott.
      6.Remind us how you won’t repeal the carbon Tax and Super Profits Resourse Tax.
      7. Remind us how you had a $70 Billion black hole in your costings.
      8. Remind us just how much of a PRICK you are and a Bible bashing, Homophobic, Misogynist .

    • Chris L says:

      08:46am | 12/12/11

      @Joan - So the “no” to gay marriage was a rock solid, iron-clad guarantee was it? Why is it he’s allowed to about face over the medicare safety net after an election but it’s not on for the other side? How can the Coalition claim the higher ground over conscience votes and immediately afteward pull the reigns on how its members vote?

      Coalition is no better than Labor at the moment. New blood is desperately needed. In Australian politics.

    • Sony B Goode says:

      08:46am | 12/12/11

      I’m going to invoke Irving’s law on Eric the Red, which states that when someone accuses another of being phobic because they don’t like or want something, it’s because the accuser probably has a secret attraction to that thing and try to hide it by distorting the other persons dislike to hatred.

      Normal reproductively driven people seem to have a natural evolutionary biological repulsion to homosexuality. That does not make them homophobic.

      Phobic is not the same as repulsed; the debate by the left follows a tired script of belittling opponents by calling them phobic. Homophobic, islamophobic. etc

      Opponents fall in the trap of having to defend themselves against a disingenuous argumentation style. Why the left feels the need for dishonest style of debate is a topic that only they can best answer.

    • Damocles says:

      08:46am | 12/12/11

      Now, now Eric The Red, take a Bex and have a good lie down and stop slobbering all over your keyboard. Tony Abbott can survive any bs you care to throw at him, because he has something Gillard will never have, principles. He will be the next PM and you Labor stooges just have to get used to the idea. Meanwhile Gillard is reshuffling the deckchairs on her sinking ship of a government. Bring on 2013!

    • badrinath says:

      09:07am | 12/12/11

      Thanks Dr Goode for your words -  “Normal reproductively driven people seem to have a natural evolutionary biological repulsion to homosexuality.” That would have to be one of the finest bits of unsubstantiated, made up brilliance that I have read here in a while.

      When you read such wholesome “goodeness” next to your last stanza about the nature of the argument and those terrible lefty-gay lovers, your message only rises in quality. Also phobia and repulsion may often have a link in this context Sonny.

    • Against the Man says:

      09:15am | 12/12/11

      You can see the frustration in Eric. Must be tough supporting a loser like Gillard. Well, Eric I hope things get better for you and your side. It has come to the point where feeling sorry for you mob is all I can do. I hate to do this to you Eric but the next link is not the kind of thing Gillard and friends want to hear but it looks like Australians are not going to be too happy with Labor.

      http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/boatpeople-to-disappear-if-refugee-claims-refused/story-fn59niix-1226219425631

      And I don’t work for the Australian. I’m not an editor with any newspaper.  I do however care about Australia and am loyal to this country, which isn’t something that can be said about the Gillard Bunch wink

    • TimB says:

      09:15am | 12/12/11

      @ Eric the Red

      1. http://www.liberal.org.au/Policies.aspx

      2. A proven lie. http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/contributors/abbotts-billion-dollar-ripoff-the-truth-on-health-funding-20100316-qaq1.html

      3. Another lie. Abbot was against Workchoices, and he’s never expressed a desire to bring it back.

      4. More lies. Jesus christ.How much stuff must you make up? When did Abbot say he was ever going to raise a tax for this? FYI, cancelling Gillard’s Carbon tax bribe =/= raising taxes.

      5. There was no vote. And it’s up to the government of the day to get support for their poicies, not the Opposition to hand it to them. If the ALP can’t convince their coalition partners the Greens to support them, then maybe they shouldn’t be in Government.

      6. When did he say he wouldn’t repeal those taxes? You really need to work on this lying thing.

      7. 70 Billion? Bloody hell I thought the 11 billion lie your mob kept spouting was bad enough. It keeps getting bigger. I’ve got a better idea Eric. How about *you* remind us how many billions of dollars the ALP has pissed against the walll in the last four years. How is that surplus going?

      8. Now you’re just resorting to outright abuse. Pathetic.

      Lies and abuse Eric. That’s all you have. With supporters like you, it’s no wonder Labor are languishing at 29% primary vote.

    • James says:

      09:32am | 12/12/11

      WHK Auditing.

      Need I say anymore?

      Conscience vote?

    • Eric says:

      09:48am | 12/12/11

      Oh dear me I’ve upset some of the liberal staffers on here I think Timmy and Against the man are most upset with hearing the truth spelled out for their little ears though. You have to do more than quote SMH papers and Liberal party web pages you sad sheep. Off you go then and don’t forget your crayons and helmets.

    • TimB says:

      09:56am | 12/12/11

      lol Eric think’s he’s spouting ‘truth’.

      Eric is nothing if not amusing.

    • Number Cruncher says:

      10:00am | 12/12/11

      And yet again all Eric the Red has to contribute is ALP propaganda and abusive comments.

    • Eric The Red says:

      10:17am | 12/12/11

      Is that it Tim B ? Typical Liberal, No answers, Just one liners. I am amusing Tim B , would you like to hear a Joke? Tony “I stand for sweet FA” Abbott.

    • Eric The Red says:

      10:27am | 12/12/11

      @ Number Cruncher says: And yet again all Eric the Red has to contribute is ALP propaganda and abusive comments.
      As Opposed to Your Liberal Party Propaganda Number Cruncher?

    • Troy says:

      11:00am | 12/12/11

      @Eric The Red. Mate Abbott could say absolutely nothing for the next 18 months and still smash Labor. There is no contest anymore, Gillard has destroyed Labor for probably a whole generation, if not totally as a political force.
      Labor will struggle to even field a front bench, and will probably end up merging with the Greens purely for survival.
      I do not agree that this is a good thing mind you, as I believe you need to political parties from opposite directions to maintain good government, but KRudd and Gillard have done such a dreadful job of running this country, and completely lost the trust of Australian voters with the Carbon Tax lie, that it will be years before Australians will take chance on a Labor Government again.

    • Troy says:

      11:03am | 12/12/11

      @TimB says: Thankyou!

    • Eric The Red says:

      11:17am | 12/12/11

      @ Troy, What theLiberal National party doesn’t get is it takes two parties to get over the one Labor Party. If it was one man one vote the Lib and Nationals would never get in, Not ever! Labor has more support for a single party than any of you Conservatives. As for joining the Greens, I think not . Maybe The Libs and Nationals Might join Bob the Mad katters Party.

    • GB says:

      11:20am | 12/12/11

      @The paper viking aka Eric the Red.  Between yourself, nossy, and acotrel you’ve turned this forum into a complete farce with your fabricated trolling bullshit. Give it a rest. If you want to debate something or get a point across do it, but resorting to blatant fiction to score points is pathetically weak.

    • Against the Man says:

      11:24am | 12/12/11

      Well said Troy, thanks for a great response.

    • Martin says:

      11:30am | 12/12/11

      @Eric the Goose. What’s your story Eric? Just another Labor bullshitter, that keeps up the lies no matter how much inconvenient truth is put before him.

      In the great tradition of Nossy, Acotrel, Persephone etc. these magnificent Labor supporting bullshitters carry on posting ALP gibber, gleefully unaware of how stupid they look.

      Eric the Goose, there are no points for getting a comprehensive slamming like TimB gave you and then rearing your rude head and saying “you’ll have to do better than that”? Who will have to do better? What the f$%k?

      Eric, he clearly answered your stupid comments and made a goose out of you and all you can come up with is “Tony “I stand for sweet FA” Abbott” !!! Ohhh good comeback Eric the Goose.

      No wonder the ALP is in dire straits, with goons like this for supporters there is little hope for them is there.

    • Julia says:

      11:40am | 12/12/11

      Joan “Labor has no conscience”
      you really need to temper your comments.  You are starting to sound like a sanctimonious git who has nothing of any substance to say, but just likes banging on with vitriol and negativity. Mm, reminds me of someone…

    • Helen says:

      11:48am | 12/12/11

      @Troy says
      “KRudd and Gillard have done such a dreadful job of running this country, and completely lost the trust of Australian voters with the Carbon Tax lie, that it will be years before Australians will take chance on a Labor Government again.”
      Hmmmm - is the Carbon Tax lie the same as the GST lie?

    • NicoleG says:

      12:26pm | 12/12/11

      What GST ‘lie’ Helen? Oh you mean the GST that Howard went TO the election with? Rather different than ‘There will be no carbon tax under the Government I lead’ lie, yes? Here you go, feel free to play it over and over.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApCwoj35d3M

    • IntelligentResponse says:

      12:41pm | 12/12/11

      You mean Gillard/ALP that has received international plaudits and awards for its handling of the economy through the GFC (including a higher credit rating than Howard achieved) and has passed significant legislation despite the challenges of minority government?
      You mean the carbon “tax” that isn’t actually a tax?
      You mean the arrival of boat people after Abbott refused to support offshore processing?
      You mean the home insulation “debacle” which dramatically improved (non-existent) safety standards for insulation intallation?

      If these are ideas for Abbott, it sounds like he’ll be spouting the same deliberately misleading garbage he’s been spouting since the last election.

    • glenm says:

      02:01pm | 12/12/11

      @ IntelligentResponse says:01:41pm | 12/12/11

      You mean the home insulation “debacle” which dramatically improved (non-existent) safety standards for insulation intallation?

      I really have to pull you up on this one,  changes to the safety standards were put in place as a result of the labor policy contributing to the deaths of inexperienced installers. Installers that were only in ceilings because of the huge financial incentive given to a specific industry with little to no forethought given to the implications of the grant. As a result young people were killled and an entire industry and a number of reputable bussiness were destroyed. 
      You may be pro labor but please dont insult the intelligence of the rest of us by continuing to claim this as win for the gillard/ rudd government.

    • Shooter says:

      02:28pm | 12/12/11

      But still has no policies

    • IntelligentResponse says:

      03:52pm | 12/12/11

      @GlenM

      “Installers that were only in ceilings because of the huge financial incentive given to a specific industry with little to no forethought given to the implications of the grant. As a result young people were killled and an entire industry and a number of reputable bussiness were destroyed. “

      That is an incredibly long bow to draw in order to accuse someone for responsibility for death.

      Don’t blame the installer who breached OH&S standards and specific Gov scheme rules by failing to train its employees.  Don’t blame the homeowner who chose a disreputable installer rather than one of the many, many reputable, longstanding insulation companies instead. 

      No, instead blame the government who rebated the homeower who chose the installer who failed to comply with their legal and contractual obligations. Why not blame the voting public who chose the Government, or the bankers who caused the GFC that necessitated stimulus spending that resulted in the HIP?

      It is analogous to blaming the gov for every death on a publicly funded-road, or every death in a public hospital.  Silly.

      By the way, I work in the insulation business.  A little reported stat is that housefires from dodgy intallations were reduced by about 85% compared to pre-HIP housefire rates.  Even with a nearly 2000% increase in the number of installs, absolute numbers of house were less than double the pre-HIP number.  Before HIP, only basic building code regulations governed installations (I remember my dad buying insulation and installing it himself when I was a kid - it’s NOT an inherently dangerous job).  HIP introduced installation safety standards as a condition of the scheme - hence the huge reduction in safety issues during the scheme.

    • Chris L says:

      06:09pm | 12/12/11

      Nice work, Intelligent Response, but tomorrow they’ll be back to listing the insulation scheme as a failure of the party, along with the successful BER which no school turned down and the NBN that will provide future-proof infrastructure that should have been installed a decade ago.

    • Tator says:

      07:50pm | 12/12/11

      Chris L,
      why not when the facts on the reviews of the BER are:
      •It was inherently inefficient to opt to build a new building – limited options -  in every primary school in this country, including ones that are slated to close.  THE OPPORTUNITY COST WAS HUGE;
      •There is no evidence that such expenditure (some $16billion) will do anything to improve educational outcomes;
      •There were blatant rip-offs and waste, particularly in NSW where the government rushed the program compared with some others;
      •The evidence of this is overwhelming comparing the cost efficiencies achieved by non-government schools (and note the difference in tone between Orgill Report I and Orgill Report II) relative to the government schools;
      •There is absolutely no evidence of multiplier effects – just check out what happened to consumption during the period, but there is clear evidence that private sector construction was crowded out;
      •The scheme effectively amounted to a massive redistribution of rents to medium to large building companies (small ones were shut out of the scheme – deliberately) courtesy of the taxpayer, especially in NSW where fees were in the vicinity of 20 to 24% of total costs.
      • GFC 1 was over before BER started - over 30% of funding not spent until 18 months after the acute phase of the GFC (Orgill interim report in August 2010)
      • If a facility is not essential, total cost is 100% waste, not just outrageous over-charges which are “measured
      • In the meantime school maintenance slips due to lack of funds (let alone public housing etc)
      • The trade training centres for secondary schools which would have had genuine economic flow on value were sidelined


      Yup, very successful, I don’t think so.

    • Christian Real says:

      07:15am | 13/12/11

      Against the man
      Mark Latham is yesterday’s hero, who really cares about him?,only Liberal suckers like you do.

    • nossy says:

      05:53am | 12/12/11

      For all his faults Malcolm it has to be said to his credit that Abbott stepped up to the plate when no one else wanted the job. Remembering back Joe Hockey looked like he was going to take the Oppn Leaders job as he ummed and arrhed for days , consulted John Howard and then finally withdrew from the running. That didnt leave much talent to choose from and Abbott the outsider got up. A long long way to go to the 2013 election and next year I suspect will be the defining year not only for Abbott but also for Gillard, who I might add is not Miss Popular either! Roll on 2012 and may the best man/woman win! Cant be fairer than that folks!

    • Semi Concerned citizen says:

      07:00am | 12/12/11

      Nossy Impersonator’s back wink

    • TimB says:

      07:12am | 12/12/11

      Nossy Nossy Nossy. Another about face? You twist with the polls my friend wink

      It’s unbecoming.

    • nossy says:

      08:57am | 12/12/11

      @TimB its called “being fair” my friend - not totally one eyed!

    • Against the Man says:

      09:17am | 12/12/11

      Brand power is important. Gillard and the ALP brand are tarnished beyond repair. There is no way back. Either kick Gillard out and start from scratch or go down with her sinking ship. Like Rudd said, ‘F@#k the future!’; for once he was right wink

    • nossy says:

      09:51am | 12/12/11

      @Against the Man   try pouring only half a bottle of Jim Beam on your cornflakes every morning ATM!  hahahah Like I said ages ago ATM when the 4-5 million Pensioners and Low Income earners go to vote having got their pay rises and tax cuts how many will vote for Tony? Try taking even $5 off someone fella - well may I say “may the best man/woman win however I strongly doubt it will be Dr NO!

    • Martin says:

      11:44am | 12/12/11

      Hey Nossy, how many of the pensioners will be voting for the stinking Labor party when they have been forced to pay 25 % more for electricity and lots more for everything else they purchase all so the ALP can “feel good” about imposing a carbon price that is 3 times of that paid in Europe.

      I’m sure they will also be most happy that Labor is inflicting this stupidity on this country in 2012, when it has been confirmed in Durban that no significant country in the world will even consider doing anything until 2020, meaning that we will be uncompetive in world markets for at least 8 years.

      Yep Nossy will be looking forward to that election all right. By the way fella, 29% is a very impressive primary vote, old fat bum will need more than a cabinet reshuffle to get herself out of that hole, a hole I might add that she has been in since she backflipped on the Carbon Tax. it stunk then and it looks like it stinks even more now.

    • glenm says:

      02:15pm | 12/12/11

      @nossy,
      My recollection of the events was that Abbott was the only one prepared to lead the party on the basis of saying no to the carbon tax. He obviously judged the situation and the mood of the electorate correctly in that regard.

    • Gratuitous Adviser says:

      06:44am | 12/12/11

      Hopefully we are heading towards a more productive time in Australian politics.  I consider that the period since the last election to be mostly an immature wasteland for intellectual and competent political argument, mainly because Abbott was constantly using the wasteful “No, No, No” strategy.  His previous strategy was that if the great unwashed heard “No, No, No” consistently they, with the help of various Alan Jones clones, would be duped enough into giving him the big job.  Now he has got to work for it, (like the patriotic independents) by coming up with policies and the supporting people that can stand the heat (without sweating and looking sideways at the camera) of scrutiny.
      By the by 1:  Why are there so many apparent leaks about the cabinet reshuffle?  It will be interesting to see if the commentator’s predictions prove true.  If so, it’s a bad look for the government with regard to competence and especially if the Rudd government destroyers (Arbib, especially) are promoted yet again.
      By the by 2:  Am I the only one that is noticing that governments and publically funded decision making bodies are either being taken over by women or professional administrators (Italy), to the determent of the male pollies.  Interesting changes happening methinks.

    • Tell It Like It Is says:

      06:59am | 12/12/11

      Many voters like myself are very happy for Abbott to “keep launching raids on the Government’s climate change and asylum seeker positions”. And it does not mean that Abbott cannot also “push well-formed Coalition policies”.  It just so happens that for many of us, the issue asylum seekers is a major one which still needs to be addressed in a grown up manner. And typically for Gillard and co. ‘climate change’ was not so pressing for a huge number of struggling families and others.  It is a good thing that Gillard was not a doctor or a nurse. Triaging is certainly not her or her imploding party’s forte.

    • Tubesteak says:

      07:40am | 12/12/11

      I’d like to see a few well-formed Coalition policies that have been accurately costed by Treasury (and not some second-rate accounting firm in WA using estimates and assumptions that are so vague as to make them meaningless).

      The asylum seeker issue is not a main or relevant issue. It’s a sideshow to keep the stupid from noticing the real issues.

      What we really should be focusing on is how to make our economy competitive in the 21st century as monoliths like China, India and Russia rise to the fore. How we can be competitive rather than just the world’s quarry.

      This will require revolutions and advancements in education and infrastructure spending. Also, we will need to ditch the middle class welfare philosophy and aide to inefficient industries that are such a waste of money.

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      07:41am | 12/12/11

      Could not agree more. I will be voting for whichever party has a credible policy for purring the brakes on all these ecomic refugees. I’m sick of my taxes going to these freeloaders.

    • Alf says:

      08:13am | 12/12/11

      @Tell It Like It Is. I’m with you.
      You can clearly see that Abbott has Labor rattled. He has been doing precisely what is expected of an opposition leader and what the majority of the electorate want. That is, not supporting bad policy.

      The reality is, this incompetent Labor government has already kicked enough ‘own goals’ to lose the match.  Even the new ‘referee’, Slipper ain’t going to change that score.

    • Tom says:

      08:35am | 12/12/11

      Tubesteak, any liar can put up costings. The trick is having any intention and capability to implement them when it comes to governing.

    • TedO says:

      08:56am | 12/12/11

      Another person, who listens to Alan Jones and reads the Tele, asylum seekers, arriving by boat, represents less than 1% of illegal immigrants, compared to the tens of thousands, who arrive by air from England, Europe and NZ, and remain here as illegal migrants, and take our jobs, wake up to yourself, and get your facts straight.
      As for the stuntman Tony Abbott, who takes every opportunity to put on a hard hat and fluro vest, is yet to produce alternate costed policies on every major issue from climate change to education, with no vision for the future, but that of a devisive and populist bigot.

    • Hermano says:

      09:01am | 12/12/11

      Let me quote Tubesteak:
      “The asylum seeker issue is not a main or relevant issue. It’s a sideshow to keep the stupid from noticing the real issues.”
      This is the truth.

    • Bonestar says:

      10:00am | 12/12/11

      @Hermano, you talk shit as an Australian i care greatly about my nations sovereignty. What shithole country did you migrate from?

    • Tom says:

      10:17am | 12/12/11

      @Bonestar, are you a pro-immigration troll attempting to make ordinary Australians appear ignorant?

      Many decent Australians are concerned about the quantity of immigration and what sort of people come here. It is an issue to us, but our arguments stand on their merits and don’t need your type of gutter language.

    • Adam Diver says:

      10:17am | 12/12/11

      @ Tubesteak, “been accurately costed by Treasury”

      Perhaps they are not partisan (well at least this hasn’t been seriously levelled) but they most certainly are not accurate.

      “The asylum seeker issue is not a main or relevant issue. It’s a sideshow to keep the stupid from noticing the real issues.” -So says the supporter of the party that has completely f**ked it up.

      As for the rest, I agree.

    • Enkl says:

      10:27am | 12/12/11

      @Tubesteak

      “I’d like to see a few well-formed Coalition policies that have been accurately costed by Treasury”

      ... and I’d like to see a few well-formed government policies - getting them accurately costed by Treasury would be a bonus, but I don’t think that’s possible.

    • Tubesteak says:

      10:39am | 12/12/11

      Bonestar
      In what way do boat people attack Australia’s sovereignty?
      I don’t think you know what the word means
      My family were boat people. They came here on the Second Fleet.

      Adam Diver
      In what way is Treasury’s analysis not accurate?
      They go with the information at hand at the time and are across the breadth of the issues. Much better than a second-rate accounting firm who were given bogus numbers to start with.

      I’m not a supporter of the Labor Party. Never have been. Have never voted for either of the major parties, in fact. Always independents or Democrats back in the day.
      Labor did not f**k up the asylum seeker issue. We have seen more push factors over the last few years which has led to a rise in boat people.

      As I said, though: boat people is a non-issue. 5,000 per year against all the other problems this country faces is not something to focus upon.

    • Troy says:

      11:18am | 12/12/11

      @Tubesteak, couldn’t agree more! But I do understand why the Liberals won’t use a Labor Stacked Treasury to cost there policies.
      In Victoria during the last election Simon Overland the Police Minister manipulated the crime figures and released them during the election to help Labor (and he was sacked for it), and the Liberals have always suspected that the Treasury is bias, and leaks there policies, so Labor do have a history of using the public servants to suit themselves.
      Regardless I really don’t think we will have to much policy costings from the Liberals in the next election, as they won’t really need to do much to smash Labor.
      Also I don’t know how much good the treasury costing are anyway, as already all Swan’s policies before the election that where costed have all blown out to almost double the original costings, so what’s the point?

    • Tubesteak says:

      12:52pm | 12/12/11

      Troy
      Everyone accuses the umpire/referee/reviewer of bias when they don’t get their way. It’s very immature.

    • Bonestar says:

      01:39pm | 12/12/11

      @Tom, i’m sick of people saying it’s a non issue when it is an issue which affects us all unlike gay marriage. I fail to see how any decent Australian isn’t concerned. The problem is the argument isn’t being had in a manner which is best for our nation but rather to advantage the ruling political party.

      @Tubesteak, because they come here illegally do you know what sovereignty means? Does declaring yourself a descendant of second fleet boat people make you feel morally superior? lol! I don’t give a stuff what fleet your family came on.

    • glenm says:

      02:29pm | 12/12/11

      @ tubesteak,
      Yes we should be focusing on making the economy competitive which is exactly why the carbon tax and the mining tax are a problem. The carbon tax income will be used to aid the inefficient industries of solar and wind power along with many others.
      Education and infrastructure spending are only part of the solution. Middle class welfare is only in place because the existing tax structure is so badly designed that middle income tax payers pay too much payg tax in the first place. A good look at our inflexible workplace policies and minimum awards would help us compete with the rest of the world.
      Asylum seekers are a side issue I agree, I wonder why then that the Gillard government cant simply restart Nauru, if it works great, it becomes a non issue , if it fails it destroys the libs policy. Gillard is in government , she can set the agenda unfortunetly it is only the politics getting in the way.

    • Adam Diver says:

      03:12pm | 12/12/11

      “We have seen more push factors over the last few years which has led to a rise in boat people.”

      Substantiate your claim.

    • Chris says:

      07:07am | 12/12/11

      “When Tony Abbott last month stomped around a military base in Afghanistan in bomb disposal kit he looked more like an over-cautious beekeeper than a man of daring deeds.”

      Way to disrespect men of uniform that disarm bombs. Instead of trying to make Abbott look bad and thus male our soldiers look bad just write the piece. You are so shallow it hurts.

    • Retired Soldier says:

      07:41am | 12/12/11

      Chris, you have no idea about men in uniform, bomb suits or disarming bombs. I wore a similar Bomb Suit for 20 years and I and defused and disarmed countless bombs and explosive devices; I doubt you did the same or we would know each other and you would not have made such a stupid comment.. By allowing Tony Abbott the opportunity to wear such equipment he will always recall the difficulties EOD/IED Operators have when dealing with such dangerous devices and having to work in such restictive and heavy protective clothing. Having that personal knowledge can only be good for the soldiers involved particularly when they request updated and more modern protective gear. Also FYI, stomping around like ” an over cautious Bee Keeper” is exactly how one approaches a bomb of any description in a 40kg suit with a very heavy blast proof helmet. Wake up to yourself and comment on what you actually know, if that amounts to anything at all.

    • SillySillyGirl says:

      07:49am | 12/12/11

      You are really reaching here!

    • Blind Freddy says:

      09:19am | 12/12/11

      @Chris

      Maybe the quote was made because he wasn’t performing “daring deeds”. It was a publicity stunt for the cameras at worse and at best what Retired Soldier wrote above.

      Reality might have it somewhere in between - but Abbott was definitely not peforming “daring deeds”.

    • RJB says:

      09:26am | 12/12/11

      @Retired Soldier, You might want to re-post to Chris, he was using quotation marks when commenting on Farr’s disrespect.

    • cybacaT says:

      09:28am | 12/12/11

      Retired Soldier
      Chris’s comments were in quotes - from Malcolm Farr’s article.  You’re beef is with MF, not Chris.  grin

    • PoorAbbott says:

      12:17pm | 12/12/11

      Wow, seems Abbott supporters have even more fragile glass jaws than Abbott…

      Poor Abbott…. when he makes a silly gaffe (stating that being fresh for a meeting more important than visiting troops) it is all a conspiracy formulated by Labor… when he froze and was visibly shaking in a threatening manner when asked a previously approved question by Channel 7 it was all part of a vast media conspiracy (disregarding the undisputed conservative political allegience of most of Aust’s media)...

      However when a senior Liberal calling Gillard a backalley b%tch it is a fair and reasonable comment. And when Abbott makes nonsensical and repeatedly inconsistent statements on pretty much every policy area (carbon dioxide is weightless plant food which couldn’t possible harm us, which is why we’re comitting to spend billions in an economically inefficient way to reduce it) it’s only because he loves us too much.

    • thatmosos says:

      07:17am | 12/12/11

      Abbott doesnt have to do much except sit back and watch as the ALP implodes with failed policy after failed policy. Lets face facts, this claytons Government that was almost voted in has a list of failed policies that long that is an embarrassment or would be if they had a clue. The billions wasted, the taxes on nothing, the rising tide of illegal immigrants and the list goes on and on and on and on and on…...............................sorry but not enough room to go on, ROFL. All Abbott has to do is continue to point out the ALP failures and he’s home free without really having to lift a finger, make a policy or even get out of bed. Joolia is the best PR for the Liberal/Nationals that they could have and the coverage of her failures and infighting makes wonderful PR for the opposition.

    • onlooker says:

      07:18am | 12/12/11

      That outfit suits him, the only thing that should be added is a rocket launcher and a coupla nukes tucked under his arm

    • gobsmack says:

      08:31am | 12/12/11

      It’s Buzz Lightyear!!

    • Retired Soldier says:

      10:15am | 12/12/11

      Please accept my humble apologies for the oversight. My comment should have been directed to MF and not Chris. Of all people I should be familiar with the fine detail but i missed that one - sorry Chris.

    • Mahhrat says:

      10:54am | 12/12/11

      @Retired Soldier - maybe the typing’s better WITH the gloves on after all those years mate?

      P.S. - thanks for your service.

    • Alf says:

      07:21am | 12/12/11

      Farr might have hopes of Labor is clawing back power while Abbott struggles to mainain his attack. All I can say is - you ain’t seen nothin yet!!  As ATM points out above, Gillard is fighting fires on all fronts. Every policy area is complete disaster. Meanwhile, Abbott is wining the fight where it counts - with blue collar workers who are at the sharp end of bad economic decisions.

      Gillard not only has the opposition to deal with, she has the Wilkie ‘issue’ to resolve and growing discord with the Greens. Not to mention a certain rat f##ker who would see her burnt at stake.

    • Retired Soldier says:

      11:15am | 12/12/11

      Mahhrat says: Thanks mate. Speaking of gloves, would you believe the only part of us that was not heavily protected was in fact our hands. No gloves = no delicate work. We used to joke that the main reason for wearing the bomb suit was to keep all our body bits in the one bag if something went wrong. Anything over a few ounces of high explosive would blow us apart but the suit would contain the pieces. Much easier to clean up the mess when it was in one parcel and they got to reissue the suit to the next dill. Fortunately it never happened in our country. P.S: the typing will never improve !

    • Alf says:

      01:28pm | 12/12/11

      @Retired Soldier. You’ve done it again. Wrong thread. Two hands on the keyboard (ie. take one out of your trousers) should do the trick.

    • KH says:

      07:29am | 12/12/11

      Abbott just needs to start with any idea, let alone a big one.  Maybe someone should write something down for him.

    • Michael says:

      11:18am | 12/12/11

      Perhaps it could be you? got any crayons? got any ideas? raspberry .

    • Dissillusioned says:

      01:07pm | 12/12/11

      very funny Michael, I laughed at that. honestly i did.  So how are all of Tonys’  Tossers today?? what bile and hate should you spew forth on those that don’t agree with your beliefs??

    • RyaN says:

      02:06pm | 13/12/11

      @Dissillusioned(sic): Aside from not being able to spell your own name, were you being purposefully ironic or would the misspelling of your own name perhaps be the pointer to the answer.

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      07:31am | 12/12/11

      Yes, but is his proposed change from Mr No to Mr Policies a promise he will keep? Has he given us this in Writing?
      Pussy’s bow would be better than Madam Incompetent & probably thrash Ms 35% at any election

    • John says:

      07:42am | 12/12/11

      Just another globalist puppet, he won’t pull the troops out. Australians what do you have to vote for? Pepsi or Coke? He won’t be revoking the carbon tax. Australia is so limited with their political choices. This idea of always allying with the US, is silly. Allying with US is most likely more of danger then not being an ally.

    • Hermano says:

      09:06am | 12/12/11

      Agreed.  Libs and Labor are just 2 very-slightly-different flavours of the same product.

    • Richard says:

      10:53am | 12/12/11

      He WILL revoke the Carbon Tax, and Aussie troops should NOT be pulled out of Afghanistan.

      You do realise that all Australian soldiers are volunteers, don’t you? Have you read the new book “Junior Officer’s Reading Club” by Patrick Hennessey? Its written by a British soldier, but the principle is the same. These guys WANT to be deployed, that’s what they’ve been trained for. And the guys they’re fighting against are BAD GUYS, they are teacher killers and little boy rapers. They deserve to be fought against. And if we don’t do it, who will?

    • Al says:

      11:03am | 12/12/11

      Richard re:“You do realise that all Australian soldiers are volunteers, don’t you?”
      Actualy, no they are not.
      They are employees. They get directions from their employer as to what they do.
      If they were volunteers they would be able to walk away or refuse to do a job with no repercussions. They would also not have to be paid.
      Just because they are doing a job they want to, does not make them volunteers.

    • Tator says:

      02:19pm | 12/12/11

      Al,
      Richard is stating that all those in the current Australian Army volunteered to join the Army and were not conscripted or forced by national service committments to serve their country.  He is not saying that they are unpaid volunteers.

    • Cookie Monster says:

      04:06pm | 12/12/11

      Al - I thought Richard comments were pretty easy to comprehend. He’s stating that our armed services aren’t conscripted - they want to be in the job and want to be deployed. That’s why they joined.

    • sandra says:

      08:18am | 12/12/11

      Mr Farr Abbott will expose his BIG ideas for oyu—be patient. two years to run yet. he has enough on his plate tryign to stop the disasters you Labor luvvies are inflicting upon all of us. many have outlined them above—but if you dont undertsnad how explosive the Gay marraige issue will be at the polls, then it proves again how detatched you are from mainstream. People are so angry but too afraid to speak their minds because of the agressive bullying of the gay lobby and Labor.The polls and Abbott speak for the majority—and they will get worse—MUCH worse. Labor will cease to exist

    • TChong says:

      10:08am | 12/12/11

      anger is there?
      What a load of BS.
      most people dont care.
      The only anger is coming from the same crowd of ignorant bigots who seem NO different to Talibaan.

      Think about it, all you outraged

    • paul says:

      08:31am | 12/12/11

      Ths is so funny. Last week nossy and the crew were gleefully going on about DR NO and how badly he is doing personally. Well guess what another poll today and guess who is back to preferred PM!

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      08:43am | 12/12/11

      It is a major part of Australian Politician’s psyche to be subservient to some Foreign Power.
      They may not start out that way but as soon as they walk through the doors of Parliament House they fall victims of an incurable Bacterial Virus, the side effects of which are: Cultural Cringe, Total Sycophancy. Loss of any concept of Independence.
      When they saw the writing on the wall for the British Empire they immediately became sycophantic, cringeing puppets of the USA. Now that the Imperial Republic, the USA, is in decline they have already tied up alongside China & in doing so have all-but destroyed Australia’s entire Manufacturing Sector. This was started by those “Great Defender’s of the Working Classes”: the ALP under Bob Hawke & Paul Keating, & then extendsed & enhanced by the Coalition under John Howard - other than the taxpayer’s money Howard gave to save his brother’s manufacturing business in NSW.

    • Merri says:

      08:58am | 12/12/11

      His negative, nagging voice and self-righteous, pompous attitude are driving me nuts - I turn off the minute he opens his mouth!!

    • fox says:

      09:40am | 12/12/11

      Compared to Gillard’s nasal shrieking,, Abbott’s voice sounds like the divine harmony of a golden-throated choir of angels who just won first place in “Heaven’s Got Talent”.

      Every single one of my overseas friends has commented on Gillard’s harpy voice, and ridiculously condescending manner of speech. She is world renowned for it, literally.

    • Bleary says:

      09:45am | 12/12/11

      Come on,that’s a bit harsh on Malcolm,he tries hard.

    • KH says:

      09:50am | 12/12/11

      Funny - i do that too - if he is on the news it is an auto response to mute the TV.  I really just can’t stand him.  There are others in the LNP who would be way better - all they have to do is put one of them in as leader, and they would have my vote even with the flimsiest of policies.  They definitely won’t have it as long as Abbott is leader.  The thought of him as PM makes my stomach turn.

    • Martin says:

      12:10pm | 12/12/11

      How laughable it is when the pathetic Labor drongos start attempting to suggest Abbott has an annoying voice when the leader of their stinking party is Julia Gillard. No one in politics has a more annoying voice than her.

      Sorry, just stating a widely reported fact. Any efforts by you ALP wallys to suggest otherwise is truly a joke.

    • Alf says:

      06:22pm | 12/12/11

      I’m surprised you Labor dimwits can use a remoe control.

    • RyaN says:

      02:32pm | 13/12/11

      People have been doing this to Gillard for ages now. We stopped listening to her so long ago now that the TV knows to switch channels when ever she appears, no need for the remote.

      Who would bother anyway, everything that comes out of her mouth is a lie anyway.

    • Al says:

      09:20am | 12/12/11

      1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.

      2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

      3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

      4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!

      5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.

      How many do we have on welfare?
      How many generations do we have on welfare?
      How many million dollars a month is spent on asylum seekers?
      How much debt is incurred daily on our behalf?
      What, apart from raw minerals, does Australia produce to gain an income from?
      How long is it going to take Australia to become Naru?

    • nossy says:

      09:20am | 12/12/11

      Mike Carltons assessment of Abbott - couldnt agree more!
      “Tony Abbott. As everyone knows, the argopelter (Anthrocephalus craniofractensis) is a fearsome beast which lurks in hollow trees and hurls rocks and rotten branches at unwary passers-by. Wikipedia, fount of all knowledge, says the argopelter has ‘‘a slender, wiry body, the villainous face of an ape and arms like muscular whiplashes, with which it can snap off dead branches and hurl them through the air like shells from a six-inch gun’‘.
      That’s Abbott and his politics to the essence. He lies in wait, seething with frustrated ambition but without policies or ideas; only relentless attack. You name it, he’s agin it. Whinge, complain, nag, whack, biff, thump. The argopelter strikes again.

      Australian Whinger of the Year for 2011”

    • NicoleG says:

      09:58am | 12/12/11

      Hang on a sec nossy. Just up the page, you’re singing Abbotts theme song and here you’re bagging the shite out of him. I am confused. Or are you just drunk and stoned?  confused

    • nossy says:

      10:57am | 12/12/11

      @NicoleG no what I said is may the best man/woman win Nicole and gave Abbott some kudos for at least having the balls to have a go - all fair comment there. But I doubt he is the man for the job Nicole unless he can surprise us all from here on - all possible.

    • TimB says:

      11:06am | 12/12/11

      Nicole, he read a poll that Abbott wasn’t winning, so had to write this.

      Apparenty this is called ‘being fair’ smile

    • Against the Man says:

      11:28am | 12/12/11

      Hey nossy where is your back up from John A Neve, Unionist or persephone? All alone to take the fall? When the going gets tough, the ALPers gets into great hiding spots!

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      11:47am | 12/12/11

      Its called not being rusted on like the majority of the Punch.

      When you have a leader and an opposition leader who are equally disliked doesn’t amount for much.

    • Martin says:

      09:23am | 12/12/11

      Of course the real problem that the Noalition face is that they don’t actually have any ideas. Now that Harry Jenkins has ensured that the Government has the numbers, the Noalition’s policy vacuum will become ever more apparent to all but the rusted on conservatives.

    • James Hunter says:

      09:29am | 12/12/11

      Foney Rabbit’s biggest problem is lack of commitment to anything and an in ability to stick with anything. Foney it Mr Expediency in fact I have observe hin change view point 180 degrees on a single subject four times in one day.
      How can anyone ever ever believe anything he says ?
      Besides over a life time I have learnt that little short men usually have self worth problems and develope ideas above their station. Maybe he be better on platform shoes.
      There is only one hounourable thing he could do ( if he were honourable that is ) and that would be to give the job To Malcolm Turnbull. Who is Intelligent Trustworthy and realises that the Government is supposed to be looking out for the long term wealfare of the Australian people.

    • Baloney Rabid says:

      11:08am | 12/12/11

      Could we please spell check our hilarious nick-naming of politicians?

    • Richard says:

      02:05pm | 12/12/11

      I used to be a supporter of Malformed Turdball, but after seeing the undemocratic way Goldman Sachs men usurped power in Greece and Italy just recently, and in light of the role of Goldman Sachs alumni in engineering the kleptocratic bailouts of Wallstreet fat cats in ‘08 (as exposed by that famous Rolling Stone article by Matt Taibbi), do we Australian’s really want Goldman Sachs’ number 1 man in Australia to be ruler of our country?

    • cybacaT says:

      09:30am | 12/12/11

      Tony Abbott is a breath of fresh air and exactly what Australia needs right now to try and repair the absolute mess Gillard and Labor have made of the country.  Pay back the debt, cancel the idiotic schemes, put back the border protection Gillard dismantled, repeal the taxes.

    • Anonymous says:

      09:52am | 12/12/11

      One step forward, facing backwards the whole time, eh?

    • Peter says:

      10:45am | 12/12/11

      Ah yes, the mythical, “absolute mess” this country is in.  The Worst Government in Australia’s History, right?  Lol.  How deluded can you be.

      Get out some more.  Go talk to people from around the world.  This country is kicking goals, mate.  Get over this bizarre idea that we are doing badly.  It’s totally in your (and others) head(s). 

      And if you think Tony Abbott is going to win an election running that line in 2013 you are absolutely kidding yourself!

    • Richard says:

      12:22pm | 12/12/11

      But Peter, anyone with any grasp of history at all realises that Australia is only in the relatively good shape it currently is in is because of 25 years of beo-liberal economic reform under Keating then Costello. But the last 4 years have been a heart-breaking litany of re-regulation, wasteful spending and socialist taxation policies. And these were exactly the same sort of policies that socialist governments in places like Greece and Italy followed which led to the mess that they’re in now! So you can see why anyone with an actual modicum of intelligence fears for this country under the continuation of this current government.

    • Martin says:

      12:29pm | 12/12/11

      Ah yes, Peter McLabor. Please assist us in setting out which “goals” this government has “kicked”.

      Are you speaking of “kicking” the mining industry in the guts, or the pubs and clubs that will be “kicked’ by pokie legislation. Or are you speaking of the carbon tax which will “kick” every Australian in the guts?

      Or perhaps its the BER which “kicked” heaps of rorts into the pockets of unscrupulous contractors, whilst “kicking” students in the guts giving them a school hall they didn’t need whilst their classroom remains without air conditioning and is still awaiting the computer KRudd promised 4 years ago.

      Or maybe its the “kick” in the guts the average family got when KRudd failed to deliver his “Grocery Watch” and “Fuel Watch” fiascos. Or perhaps you are refering to the “kick’ in the guts decent contractors got when Labor closed down the Pink Batts fiasco because they didn’t manage it properly to stop rorting?

      Lets have those goals they are kicking Peter, I’m sure we are all ears waiting.

    • Cleo Basset says:

      01:24pm | 12/12/11

      Are you the same Martin from Tony Abbott’s Electorate Office? Sure sounds like it!......

    • nossy says:

      01:37pm | 12/12/11

      @Cleo Basset   hahahha he probably is Cleo - poor little bugger its just nice to see him write a piece every now and then - dont be too hard on him - love ya Marty!

    • james says:

      01:57pm | 12/12/11

      8% debt to GDP ratio and no recession.

      We are sooooo screwed!!!!

    • Martin says:

      02:00pm | 12/12/11

      No Cleo, just an average punter trying to counter the absolute nonsense from the Labor drongos.

      Nossy, been busy today mate, has Labor got you on a pay per word contract? Does Centrelink endorse this type of use of their computers? Do you claim to be gainfully employed whilst posting your crap on here?

    • Richard A says:

      06:09pm | 12/12/11

      Martin, can you remind us of the profit which BHP generated most recently after being “kicked in the guts”?  $22 billion rings a bell.  If that is being kicked in the guts, where do I sign up?

      Or the pubs and clubs who cannot run a business without profiting from the misery of their customers, unlike their counterparts in WA?  And then have the hide to talk about their singledigit % donation rate?

      Or the carbon tax where plenty of Australians will be better off, unlike your claim that “all” Australians will be kicked in the guts?

      Please…...at least try and appear rational.

    • cybacaT says:

      09:23am | 13/12/11

      Martin

      You said it well.  It’s kinda pathetic when the Laborites point out we’re doing better than Greece as some sort of crowning achievement.  I’d prefer to contrast how we’re doing now with how we were doing under Howard and how we SHOULD be doing now.  Under Howard we argued over how big our tax cuts would be each year - not over massive new taxes.  We argued over which sector was getting the biggest real income (after tax) increases.  We debated over just how big a surplus Costello would bring in each year - not deficits.  We were disappointed that there were still 3 boats a year coming in illegally - not 3 every couple of days. 

      People have short memories forgetting how amazingly well Australia was going before they put in a Labor government.  Everything we predicted has come true.  More strikes, more taxes, surplus turned into deficit, hair-brained schemes wastefully executed.

      You’re right - they have no goals on the board.  And at this stage Gillard’s making Abbott look like Ablett.

    • cybacaT says:

      09:23am | 13/12/11

      Martin

      You said it well.  It’s kinda pathetic when the Laborites point out we’re doing better than Greece as some sort of crowning achievement.  I’d prefer to contrast how we’re doing now with how we were doing under Howard and how we SHOULD be doing now.  Under Howard we argued over how big our tax cuts would be each year - not over massive new taxes.  We argued over which sector was getting the biggest real income (after tax) increases.  We debated over just how big a surplus Costello would bring in each year - not deficits.  We were disappointed that there were still 3 boats a year coming in illegally - not 3 every couple of days. 

      People have short memories forgetting how amazingly well Australia was going before they put in a Labor government.  Everything we predicted has come true.  More strikes, more taxes, surplus turned into deficit, hair-brained schemes wastefully executed.

      You’re right - they have no goals on the board.  And at this stage Gillard’s making Abbott look like Ablett.

    • Michael R says:

      09:42am | 12/12/11

      You mean like Big Kev’s Big Australia? Big NBN white elephant? Big boat people stuff up? Big waste of money on school hall ripoffs? Big lie about a big carbon tax? I could go on, but us plebs have had a gutful of big ideas. We simply wan’t a leader who can live within our means, deliver what they promise, secure our borders, and protect what we’ve got. Big be damned!

    • Wendy says:

      10:03am | 12/12/11

      Just tell me how the ABC can run an interview in which the speaker says there are 33 countries around the world with a carbon tax - and California ( same size economy as Australia) and China are getting theirs prepared… and in the next minute in the news Abbott says our carbon tax is an international “orphan”???
      Obivously someone’s wrong!

    • fox says:

      11:47am | 12/12/11

      Manipulating words and stats, maybe 33 countries do have a carbon tax.

      In the same way that a person working two hours a week doesn’t count as unemployed.

      True, but misleading.

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      10:08am | 12/12/11

      Eric the Red.
      Succinct & accurate
      We could, if we wanted tobe really, really nasty make a few points about Kevin Rudd & Julia Gillard.
      So here goes!
      $23 billions squandered handing out money to people who did not need it & went out & bought Huge Plasma & LCD TVs which did nothing for Australia’s Economy & a whole heap for those of Malaysia & China - as if either needed a boost to their economies for, starting with Bob Hawke & Keating, added to by Howard & extended even further by Rudd & Gillard almost all of Australia’s manufacturing Industry now resides in China, Malaysia, India, Taiwan etc.
      Then there was Jules’ Building the Education Revolution which resulted in schools having 10s of 1000s of computers but no money to pay for the electricity to run them, school Halls & Libraries which they did not want, with some even getting a couple of each all so Jules could put up expensive billboards telling us what she was doing. Then there were the billions ripped off in rorts. Then there was the Green Loans disaster which cost more billions. The Death-dealing Home Insulation Programme which also cost billions & then more of them to fix the disaster that became.
      Kevin squanders our money, now in the millions, swanning around the world big-noting himself, helping nasty druggies who get caught buying drugs in Bali but refusing, at the behest of the USA, Julian Assange fight the trumped up allegations against him.
      Oh! and Moving Forward a tad the usurper Julia Gillard wants to do a Cabinet Reshuffle but she is so shit scared of, yet again, offending Kevin she leaves him in place as Foreign Minister. cast your mind back a few days when she maliciously & deliberately in an act of the most utter bitchiness air-brushed Kevin out of ever having been Prime Minister!!
      Then we had the disaster of the Malaysian Solution. How many millions did that stupid exercise cost?
      She of the Party which purports to stand up for the Disadvantaged, the Desperate, the Displaced of the world - some as a direct result of our politicians (both sides) war-mongering: Iraq & Afghanistan spring to mind.
      Yet she would have them locked up in Malaysia with every possibility that men, women & children would be subjected to repeated canings by Malaysian officials.
      Rudd, Gillard, Swan, Bowen et al. have been a disaster for Australia.
      Rudd, Gillard & Swan have, totally unnecessarily, landed Australia with 100s of billions in debt. That it is a tiny proportion of GDP is immaterial & irrelevant for the wider population.
      I don’t like Abbott. I loathe his misogyny, his homophobia & his dishonesty - which is equalled by Gillard’s.

    • Cranky ol' Bugga says:

      10:26am | 12/12/11

      Wow, that’s quite a spray Robert! Nice to get it all off your chest, I guess.
      With regard to your last sentence, I am wondering who you will vote for at the next election. Seems like the Greens might get a go!

    • HardHat says:

      12:15pm | 12/12/11

      “cast your mind back a few days when she maliciously & deliberately in an act of the most utter bitchiness air-brushed Kevin out of ever having been Prime Minister!!”  Tend to agree with you. What a mess. That incident offended me and I bet I am not alone. I don’t like Abbott either, there is no swing room anymore. I don’t want to vote green, shame voting is compulsory its a waste of petrol going down to put in a blank ballot.

    • prosperity says:

      10:09am | 12/12/11

      All this kerfuffle about Tony Abbott, Julia Gillard and Australian politicians in general - when the whole lot of them count for nought. There is not a statesperson among them. On the contrary they are, with few exceptions,  incompetent and self-seeking.  As an American official said to an Australian business person of my acquaintance in his assessment of the “coffee boys”, “We love your Australian politicians. Not only are they happy to be on the take, they’re so goddam cheap!”

    • cityboy @ Sydney says:

      10:11am | 12/12/11

      Whichever way you look at it, the Government is leading the agenda, the coalition is simply reacting, with increasingly ridiculous responses from completely ridiculous spokesthingies.
      Action figure Tony (a la Putin) has become a total bore.

    • Peter says:

      10:38am | 12/12/11

      Spot on.  First sensible post thus far.

    • Martin says:

      12:59pm | 12/12/11

      @Citytwerp. Oh yes setting the agenda. Buggering up school halls, open slather with asylum seekers “come one come all”, stupid carbon tax 8 years early making us completely uncompetitive and on it goes.
      Fine agenda that, wake up to yourself.

      “Action figure Tony has become a total bore” not half as boring as reading completely unfounded critisism of an extremely competant politician who is keeping to account a useless, divided and destructive Labor government.

    • cityboy @ Sydney says:

      01:14pm | 12/12/11

      Well, Martin, what is Phoney Tony’s agenda (other than saying no to everything) ! Should I come back in an hour or 2 after you’ve had a scratch around the fowlhouse for a policy or 2 ??  I guess at least he is trying out different occupations for his life after politics…... Polishing apples looks good!
      By the way, I am enjoying my roof insulation enormously.
      Every tradie type who needs to get into the ceiling comments on how well it has been laid!

    • Martin says:

      02:31pm | 12/12/11

      @citytwerp. More childish dribble. As for Liberal policies, here’s the link why not educate yourself rather than indulging in brainless groupthink. http://www.liberal.org.au/

    • Peter says:

      09:25am | 13/12/11

      Ah yes, a link to the Liberals website.  Thanks Martin.  When asked “what are his policies” you get a link to the website. Seen it over and over from guys like this.  They never actually tell you what they are.  You know why?  Because they don’t know!  LMAO.  They don’t know.  Yet they support him, blindly.  They just hate Gillard and the ALP.  Sums it up, really.  It’s about having power, not about doing anything in particular, really.  Just having your guy in power.  Screw reality and who/what is good or not good for this country.

      Martin, go and think about some of this for awhile.  Take your NLP hat off for awhile and go think for yourself.  Then make a decision.  Have a unique opinion.  Until you do that your opinion is useless to the rest of us.

    • Martin says:

      09:52am | 13/12/11

      @Peter, crusted on Labor goose. I forgot that you need to lead Labor dunces by the hand. OK, here we go Peter. Firstly click on the link. Then there is a toolbar at the top of the home page with headings such as Economy, Small Business, Health, Environment etc. You click on each of these and there is the downloadable policy! Simple, or maybe not so if you’re a Labor drongo.

    • Leigh says:

      10:26am | 12/12/11

      Abbott should ignore the incompetent government’s taunts that he is negative, and keep on attacking stupid, costly and ineffectual government policies. He should keep his own policies close to his chest until much closer to an election.

      We got a Rudd government, then the even worse Gillard government because Labor pinched Liberal policies, fooled the voters, then reneged on the policy promises when they got in.

    • Peter says:

      11:20am | 12/12/11

      No way.  The negative taunts are actually coming from the general populace.  The government has simply picked up on it and is repeating the line.  If Tony ignores this sentiment, it is to his peril. 

      People say he is negative because he is/has been very negative.  His philosophy is that Oppositions don’t win elections - Governments lose them.  So his strategy has been to try to undermine everything the Government has tried to do.  Along the way, he has denied reality, talked down our economy, aligned himself with the likes of Alan Jones and the Shock Jock crowd, and committed his party into absurd and contradicting policy positions that simply don’t make sense.

      So it is not that he has kept his policies “close to his chest”.  It’s that he has offered very little in the way of intelligent alternative policies.  Do you see?  He’s had plenty of “policies”, they’ve just been reactionary rubbish designed to confound the current government as opposed to convincingg anyone he would make a good PM.

    • Martin says:

      03:15pm | 12/12/11

      29% Primary vote for Labor, what sentiment do you think that portrays, Peter?

    • nossy says:

      03:52pm | 12/12/11

      @Martin   hahah Marty so you do have a job after all - I hear you work in Tones Abbotts office - hey big fella - do you do all his Chrissy stamp licking?  hahahahha

    • Peter says:

      09:33am | 13/12/11

      Ha Martin, you know I’m right, deep down, don’t you.  Sorry mate, but i’m not your enemy.  Just pointing out the bleeding obvious.  Good luck with the election (when it eventually happens).

    • Richard says:

      10:38am | 12/12/11

      This is a good article Mal, and you’ve really got to the heart of why I love Tony Abbott, despite the prevailing bien pensant attitude that dictates he should be hated.

      I adore the overt expression of masculinity that Tony Abbott exudes, I approve of his physicality and manliness. You know, when I was growing up, in fact for the whole first 25 years of my life, it always seemed to me that “testosterone” was a dirty word. It was always used it seemed to me as an adjective to used to describe someone disapprovingly: “Oh those testorone-soaked hoons ought to be neutered” etc.

      But then I came to understand that testosterone is not a dirty word, its a natural, healthy hormonal part of being a male human, i.e. being a man. In many ways, I think this unfair discrimination against men is what’s beyond the prevailing attitude of loathing towards Abbott: the fact that he is so bold and swaggering, that he does push the boundaries, that he is so unashamedly masculine, that he is in many ways a cowboy maverick.

      A generation of Australians have been indoctrinated in though patterns that condemn this natural expression of manliness. Well I have woken up to this and shaken off the latent hypnosis under which I laboured for 25 years, which held me back, and caused a subconscious self-loathing of myself for simply possessing a Y chromosome, for simply being soaked with testosterone.

      I cast off the discriminatory condemnation of society, embraced my masculinity, and became liberated, and thus now I can appreciate the manly virtues of Tony Abbott, and wish all other people in Australia to do so as well.

    • Horns Up says:

      12:57pm | 12/12/11

      Gay.

      \m/

      (Not that there’s anything wrong with that….)

    • Richard says:

      01:29pm | 12/12/11

      Nope. I rejoice in the overt expression of masculinity. Homosexual men on the other hand are characterised by being effete and effeminate. Not that there’s anything wrong with it, if that makes them happy. But there IS something wrong with condemning masculinity and hating on Abbott because he is so unashamedly manly.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      01:49pm | 12/12/11

      Dont know how to take this post, you would have to have carpet burn on your knees?

    • Horns Up says:

      01:53pm | 12/12/11

      “Nope.”

      Oh yes definitely gay.

      “I rejoice in the overt expression of masculinity.”

      So do lots of blokes that ride the floats at Madi Gras.

      “Homosexual men on the other hand are characterised by being effete and effeminate.”

      Bullshit generalisation.

      “But there IS something wrong with condemning masculinity and hating on Abbott because he is so unashamedly manly. “

      You can pretend that’s why people condemn Abbott if that makes you feel better, at best it’s as important to the condemnation of Abbott as red hair is to Gillard.

      The problem for Abbott is only focused on winning for his own self and people see that.

      \m/

    • Richard says:

      04:15pm | 12/12/11

      “Oh yes definitely gay.”

      Nope, most definitely not gay. Homosexuality is predominately a phenomenon of sexual attraction. At no point did I refer to sexuality or sexual attraction, but only my respect and admiration. Your continued insistence that there is a sexual aspect to my feelings regarding this issue is a form of sexual harassment, and not a fair way to debate at all.

      “So do lots of blokes that ride the floats at Madi Gras.”

      You are reading your own prejudices into my words dude. It reveals more about you than it does about me.

      “Bullshit generalisation.”

      Yes. You do realise what the word ‘characterised’ means, don’t you?

      “You can pretend that’s why people condemn Abbott if that makes you feel better, at best it’s as important to the condemnation of Abbott as red hair is to Gillard.”

      Far from pretending, I have forwarded my genuine assertion on this site many times that Abbott is hated not for what he does, but for what he IS. The progressive left hates the idea that a white conservative catholic christian man is going to be the next Prime Minister, and so they go out of their way to be insulted by any small slight they perceive he lets slip.

      Just as I think that anybody who criticises Gillard for being an unmarried, childless atheist is wrong, so I also believe that anybody who hates Abbott for being a white male conservative catholic christian is wrong (bearing in mind that being a conservative catholic necessarily means opposing abortion and gay-marriage).

    • Horns Up says:

      08:18pm | 12/12/11

      Lots of words pretending it’s not gay. It’s very gay.

      “Your continued insistence that there is a sexual aspect to my feelings regarding this issue is a form of sexual harassment, and not a fair way to debate at all.”

      It’s a form of comic assessment of a very silly point and entirely fair considering (assuming you’re the same Richard) your penchant for belligerence in lieu of a point when challenged.

      “You are reading your own prejudices into my words dude. It reveals more about you than it does about me.”

      Yes it reveals that I think your point that dislike of Abbott is some bizarre form of man hate is weak and your slathering admiration of Abbott’s virility is just a teensy bit gay.

      “Yes. You do realise what the word ‘characterised’ means, don’t you?”

      Yes. You do realise what the word ‘bullshit’ mean, don’t you?

      “Far from pretending…yak yak yak”

      Abbott is disliked for his attack dog personality, his lack of vision and idea needs, his divisiveness, his nastiness, his negativity and his history of failure in office.

      \m/

    • Horns Up says:

      10:57am | 12/12/11

      Abbott has and always will be an attack dog. He has never contributed anything positive so changing his spots now will be close to impossible. Importantly even if he goes through the charade because he’s finally realised that people want more that a pollie who is only interested on winning government rather than what makes a good government, there are many who will not forget.

      \m/

    • Paul says:

      11:20am | 12/12/11

      The only idea this abbott idiot has is WORKCHOICE CONTRACTS.

    • Tom says:

      11:35am | 12/12/11

      You aren’t very bright are you Malcolm .D0 you honestly believe Abbott should come up with the “On the back of an envelope” great Super Ideas such as The NBN, CARBON TAX, MRRT, OPEN BORDER POLICY, MALAYSIAN POLICY,ROOF INSULATION SCHEME, HEALTH REFORM,$900 PRESENTS, SET TOP BOX GIVEAWAYS,EDUCATION REVOLUTION, GREAT NEW SPEAKER . I could go on!!!!

    • Sarah says:

      11:42am | 12/12/11

      So depressing.

      We can vote for Abbott or we can vote for Gillard.

      Yeay.

      Two total duds. Whatever happened to the idea of the big Statesman politicians????

      Come back! Please! - We need some fresh blood BADLY in Australian politics

    • noone says:

      12:11pm | 12/12/11

      So does this mean Abbott will stop wasting Question time and not move any more Motions of No Confidence now that Slipper is the Speaker and the numbers are not in his favour. I am sick and tired of his antics, like a school yard bully. As to hearing ALL the comments about Abbott being the next PM, if he is challenged, and I beleive he will be, will you be chanting the same and saying he still will be.

    • nossy says:

      12:29pm | 12/12/11

      @noone Slipper looks as though he will be tougher than Jenkins noone - he sent 4 Libs to the sin bin on his first day and he wasnt even warmed up - expect Chrissy Pyne to spent a lot of time on suspension - Jenkins was way to kind to that chap.

    • luke09 says:

      12:34pm | 12/12/11

      Malcolm, you have written for Abbott to be economically accountable quote, “But if he is looking for mighty deeds to accomplish he might start with an Opposition economic policy that adds up, and a certain amount of boldness on the workplace relations front.”

      Maybe you can ask the Gillard Government to be economically accountable as well, nearing 200 billion in debt and borrowing 100 million dollars a day doesn’t seem to add up either.

      Both sides of politics seem unable to add up, what do you suggest Gillard should do seeing her government is facing annihilation at the next election?

    • Farken says:

      12:35pm | 12/12/11

      you just cant trust any one in politics cause they all lie and that christian tony abbott said he does and we know the pm does as well . so don’t whine about it like its the first time any politician has cause if you do you sound like fools . but are you going to vote for some one who does not tell you what they may do in office if you do it may make you look like a bigger fool that is complaining about a politician lying them

    • Tom says:

      03:05pm | 12/12/11

      “that christian tony abbott “, I bet you would not have the gonads to say it like that about a Muslim leader in a Muslim country.

    • Anonymous says:

      04:01pm | 12/12/11

      Yeah, except this is about Australia, which is a secular nation. Even if this was a Christian country, politicians still wouldn’t have the right to give them preferential treatment.

    • the Labor Landslide says:

      12:41pm | 12/12/11

      The Opinion Polls are Tony Abbott’s secret weapon.

    • James Hunter says:

      01:25pm | 12/12/11

      One realy good thing this site and this article and other similar is that it gets all the Paid Liberal Party Stooges in ine place at the one time. !!

      As Peter early on in th eresponses says
      To all the Doomsayers and Stooges, Get out and talk to people, this country is Kicking Goals.

      The Liberal Party are Not and Never were “Born To Rule ” Those days are long gone before button up boots went out and women got the vote.

    • Martin says:

      03:23pm | 13/12/11

      @JH, are these goals like the one Combet kicked in Durban, where it is now confirmed we will be paying a carbon price for 8 years while the rest of the world looks on and laughs at how stupid we are?

    • holden says:

      01:34pm | 12/12/11

      I really have a problem saying anything laudatory about someone who, as a supposedly educated adult, still has a childish belief in the superstitious nonsense passed off as “religion”.
      I don’t wan’t my Country run on the basis of ritualistic mumbo-jumbo spread as a weapon of control-by-fear, two thousand years ago.
      I doubt whether the posters here would give credence to the story if they came from a religion-free place and settled in Australia where some bloke, (?), dressed in a frock recounted the fable and asked them to accept the dogma as truth. Think about it.
      That’s what you fools will vote for at the next election.
      As for Gillard, the overseas press is much kinder than the Aussie press. They have this Government at a higher level than all but four other Western Nations in terms of economic growth and potential. Take the blinkers off, guys.
      This is only Reader’s Digest info, but for what its worth..
      A surprising number of voters who vote Conservative do so, not because they belong to that class ordinarily, but because they crave the association by ‘similar act’. They apparently get some satifaction by being able to say to themselves, “I vote with the moneyed folk”.
      Wierd, isn’t it?

    • fox says:

      03:22pm | 12/12/11

      Virtually all Christian countries enjoyed the best quality of life in the entire world for many centuries.

      Only recently have they become non-Christian, and just look at the decline in the quality of living we are seeing year by year.

      Is it a coincidence that billions of people on non-Christian countries have been dying (literally and figuratively) to get the chance for them and their families to live in Christian and semi-Christian countries? Ie where society is still underpinned by the Christian culture going back hundreds of years and where the main religion is still Christianity?

    • Cookie Monster says:

      03:53pm | 12/12/11

      holden “A surprising number of voters who vote Conservative do so, not because they belong to that class ordinarily, but because they crave the association by ‘similar act’. They apparently get some satifaction by being able to say to themselves, “I vote with the moneyed folk”. Wierd, isn’t it?”

      And you got this factual piece of information from where exactly?

    • Soames says:

      01:37pm | 12/12/11

      Military authorities should have taken a more adventurous attitude when refusing Abbott’s ambition to go on patrol with Special Forces. Give the Action Man more room to manouvre I say.  Give the Leader of the Opposition a chance to win some kudos, and even win a Victoria Cross. Give him a chance, please.

    • Venise Alstergren says:

      04:39pm | 12/12/11

      The whole concept of the Coalition is a group of people who are against change. They have no philosophy, no ideals. Tony Abbott personifies all that is wrong with the Liberals. All bark, no action. The fact that his fellow parliamentarians do not wish to give him the boot is a deadly comment on the motivations of the Party itself. They are too tired to organise a decent leader. They don’t deserve to get into power, and they wont.

      The people who are polled, the ones we are meant to be impressed by are not a true indication of voting intent.

    • Salad Roll says:

      06:11pm | 12/12/11

      When Labor holds a federal election in March 2012 or DEC 2012, Labor will win easily and Abbott will disappear into the dustbin of history

    • Steven Guy says:

      07:55pm | 12/12/11

      Precisely. The fools in the press have overrated Abbott for a long time. He’s starting to wear out his welcome with the public. My guess is that he’ll be history by Easter of 2012. He’s never going to become the prime minister and perceptive people knew that he never was going to become the prime minister. It is amazing how the press gallery have been hoodwinked by this silly man.

    • Robert Smissen Of rural SA says:

      10:20pm | 12/12/11

      Salad Roll &Steven; Guy, I think the stuff you are smoking is WAAAAAAAY too strong for your itty-bitty little heads, may I suggest a light beer made by some Victorian beer manufacturer

    • ACROBAT says:

      06:31pm | 12/12/11

      Roxon wont make any impact at all as we cant even remember her as shadow attorney
      general!And wil she be consistent or chop and change like her boss Gillard! if Roxon is so
      adept why did she have to wage war with the cigarette companies to get her plain packaging
      through? Now that wont stop smoking and it may not stop Labor from going out because we dont
      like lack of political integrity that Labor exudes! High office should mean high honor The
      voters want the truth not more backflips than an acrobat that we have witnessed under
      Gillard! We have witnessed off shore processing ,now on shore processing, no carbon tax now
      carbon tax, no gay marriage, now gay marriage conscience vote so whats next ?

    • LON says:

      07:46pm | 12/12/11

      Tony Abbott certainly has destiny in his favour as his near death experience with a semi trailer showed during the last election, the event was like a preview of things to come, an alpha male scenerio of relentless political provocation of the competition using whatever it takes to achieve transition to the Lodge and ultimately savour the respect he never fully received from John howard. Labor just managed to divert it’s own self inflicted humiliation,but it was also equally humiliating for Tony Abbott too, the voters had not been convinced enough of his leadership potential no matter how inept the Labor election campaign had been. Sins of the past had removed the Independents from ever seeking alliance with the LNP, Abbott would never have been as approachable to the detail of their policy agendas as Gillard no matter what he promised the chances were very high of an early election with the LNP in power. It is ironic for Abbott that the feminine style has suited minority government with Gillard’s capacity for detente and compromise, her handling of Rudd would not have lasted long under Abbott as the Peter Slipper fiasco has showed. It is likely that Malcolm Turnbull would have been Abbott’s Rudd during his administration, especially if Rudd, in opposition, found his best form again.With Julia Gillard as PM Abbott has been forced to face his own self made dichotomy as he attempted to disenfranchise Labor from it’s frail coalition,especially with Bob Brown and the Greens, whilst counteracting the policy divide noticably widening between Labor and the LNP. The lack of LNP policy depth was made worse because of the poor research and development within the LNP thinktank, it forced them to compete with Labor’s policy threats rather than use intelligent rebuttal, something that Turnbull had at least tried to do when he was opposition leader. Abbott has made himself presidential with his individualistic campaign, he has become the sole focus of the LNP,his fellow front benchers find very little scope for their own credibility as shadow ministers outside his media influence. Turnbull appears to be the only shadow minister who refuses to be in Abbotts shadow and pays the price by having to criticise something he accepts,the NBN, and tow the line with the carbon tax.
      Whilst Turnbull is denied his true status as policy developer and tactician
      little can be expected to evolve to push the dagger further into Labor’s wounds. Hopefully Abbott will realise this before the next two years are up.

    • TC says:

      08:41pm | 12/12/11

      So Malcolm, did Rudd and Labor present all their policies 2 years out from an election? No, they were still swapping leaders. Why, sudddenly, is there a demand for the opposition to be just like the government, releasing policies and costings on everything every step of the way? Newsflash! The Opposition is NOT the government! I know wthere are people out there who think everything bad that happens is, actually, Tony Abbott’s faultm but why must journalists take leave of their faculties and go along with this?

    • CT says:

      06:07am | 13/12/11

      Here’s another Newsflash! Before I even consider voting for Tony “Make it up as I go along” Abbott I want to know for sure that the things he is proposing are going to be costed and put out for comment and analysis - none of this “last second, respected Perth accountancy firm economic policy”. And incidentally, given the current polls, there’s not much chance of his NOT becoming PM, so I think it’s very fair to expect more openess from his mob. Whether things are his faultm or not, reporting of his activities has to be on the same level as the government.

    • marley says:

      07:13am | 13/12/11

      @CT - you want to be sure Abbott’s proposals have been costed and put out for analysis.  Like the NBN was?

    • DaveM says:

      08:09am | 13/12/11

      The thing I find hilarious about all of the dried on ALP lovers here is that they don’t understand that the longer their beloved leader clings to power the worse it will get.
      If Gillard had gone to an election 9-12 months ago, they may have been in with a chance of being re-elected after 3 terms. An election now would see the Libs challenging Menzies for the longest serving government in Australia’s history. And if we are all unfortunate enough to still not have had an election by this time next year, well you can kiss your beloved ALP goodbye as they will be nothing but a minor party destined to go the way of the Democrats.

      Your beloved Julia is not only killing this country, she’s killing the ALP!

    • Drew(Darlinghurst) says:

      10:41am | 13/12/11

      Tony is a Tosser

      ...and a Catholic Zealot to boot.

      Yikes!!!!!

    • Martin says:

      03:28pm | 13/12/11

      Oh most intelligent stuff. Another Labor drongo in action. Yikes alright.

    • Drew(Darlinghurst) says:

      10:41am | 13/12/11

      Tony is a Tosser

      ...and a Catholic Zealot to boot.

      Yikes!!!!!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

Awesome headline on http://t.co/IsV33Y2o. "CLUSTER-ZUCK". http://t.co/hPCNEkAi

Anthony Sharwood

@MickNeven the game is called rugby league not rugby. Just like it's cricket not croquet! Sorry I can't catch ya show.

ToryShepherd

@KevCorduroy @ceda_news Cheers, couldn't get on to them but Redmond's office helped out in the end!

ToryShepherd

Does half the population really want to close the borders?? http://t.co/cNmpV2qH

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Schapelle has done her time

Schapelle has done her time

Schapelle Corby has served more than seven years in Kerobokan prison for attempting to import 4.2 kilos…

Do women need to know when to walk away?

Do women need to know when to walk away?

Opposition Leader Isobel Redmond has sparked controversy over her advice that young women should sometimes…

Who murdered the Arts degree?

Who murdered the Arts degree?

Have we murdered the liberal arts education? That was the final question on Monday night’s Q&A…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter