Elvira Brunt is a mysterious figure, born in Backa Palanka on the banks of the Danube in 1957. She allegedly claims to be able to cure cancer by redirecting blood flow through massage. People have told of the eerie power she holds over people, convincing them to believe in her work.

The clinic of a circulatory specialist. Pic: Tait Schmaal

To tell Elvira’s story, you don’t have to back to Backa Palanka, but you do have to go back to a day in 2009. It was one of the strangest days I’ve ever had in a newsroom – and trust me, they can be pretty bloody bizarre places.

This day, though, stands out. I was covering an inquiry into Bogus, Unregistered and Deregistered Health Practitioners. It was mostly about quacks offering dodgy cures for cancer, and people poured out their tales of loved ones frittering away their savings in vain hope.

One man allegedly subjected a patient to “vaginal blowing”, another allegedly said she could “kill the worms” that cause cancer.

And then there was Elvira. People spoke about her in hushed tones. Some reverential, some secretive, some angry.

Elvira Brunt runs the Fravira Clinic in Adelaide’s leafy suburbs.

On June 16 2009, Labor MP Ian Hunter tabled the inquiry report that named her for allegedly claiming she could cure cancer through abdominal massage, charging thousands of dollars.

On June 17, I was writing a follow up report on Elvira, based on the evidence submitted to the inquiry.  According to those submissions, Elvira allegedly encouraged a family to deny morphine to a dying man. She allegedly tried to convince the parents of a young leukaemia victim to delay giving her treatment, convinced them not to give her pain relief, and urged the father to feed her KFC chicken.

I was digging through all these terrifying, fraught stories, and meanwhile Elvira’s supporters would call me, tell me how they’d been saved, how she was a miracle worker.

Then the newsdesk shouted out and asked for the address of the Fravira Clinic, because a toddler had just been killed there.

Sophie Schulz had been crushed by an electric massage table. It was completely unrelated to anything from the bogus health practitioner report. Just a weird, tragic coincidence. It was both a police story, and a deeply personal story, and truly bizarre story.

The coronial inquiry into Sophie’s death has started. And today Elvira Brunt was giving evidence. So I went to see her. To see whether she was this alluring, charismatic character that some described.

It started as a straightforward sort of occupational health and safety interview. It was about the possible dangers in a massage clinic; the electricity, the tables, whether you could get a finger trapped. Elvira told the court she had been “over cautious” about safety, that she constantly assessed risk but “never, ever imagined” that a child could get crushed under the tables she used for her massage.

Elvira wasn’t in the room at the time – an employee was preparing the patient, Sophie’s Mum Justine – for her arrival. She is not facing any charges.

Then it took a turn for the weird.

Deputy State Coroner Anthony Schapel asked Elvira what, exactly she did. She said she was a “circulatory specialist”. “I manipulate and redirect blood flow,” she said.

He pushed her on her qualifications and she said she had a medical degree from “Old Yugoslavia” that wasn’t recognised here, and that the Australian Medical Association had told her she wasn’t allowed to display those qualifications.

She was asked what year she did her internship in. She replied she didn’t even know what year it is now. Someone told her it was 2012.

Schapel pushed her on what a circulatory specialist was.

“I don’t use that title. The title I use is Elvira,” she replied. She said people just know who she is, and what she does, and they come to her – too many of them; she says she’d like to cut down on work.

I wanted to understand Elvira better, to understand how she draws these crowds of true believers. There must be some sort of charisma, some magical allure, I had always thought – I’d never been able to catch her at the clinic before, she’d refused to speak on the phone, and the only photo we had of her was unclear and old.

But I don’t understand her any better now. She was a stern, middle-aged woman with striking eyebrows, who seemed confused at times and angry at others, and not particularly outstanding in any specific way.

Maybe you can’t see it without a more open mind; maybe on her own turf, the calming surrounds of the clinic, she has more power; maybe it’s not her that’s the magnet but what she sells – hope.

Twitter: @ToryShepherd
Comments on this post will close at 8pm AEDST.

Most commented

25 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • St. Michael says:

      01:10pm | 07/11/12

      At a guess, the explanation for the phenomenon is that Elvira’s a lot less comfortable in a setting where she has to tell the truth and has to answer questions objectively - unlike her clinic.

    • subotic J. Farnsworth says:

      02:39pm | 07/11/12

      Cubert J. Farnsworth: Your explanations are pure weapons grade balognium. It’s all impossible.

      Professor Hubert Farnsworth: Nothing is impossible. Not if you can imagine it. That’s what being is a scientist is all about.

      Cubert J. Farnsworth: No, that’s what being a magical elf is all about.

    • K^2 says:

      01:57pm | 07/11/12

      Gotta tell you, having lost someone recently to cancer - most “approved” treatments dont work either.  But its ok to “sell ‘em snake oil” as long as its attached to big pharma, and the government to tax it, isnt it?

      Meanwhile I hear about things like Royal Raymond Rife and how his research was completely buried by big pharma.  They have no interest in a cure, they make more money in treatments, than in cures.

      Basically if you are diagnosed with cancer, it should be your own god-given right to choose whatever kind of treatment you like, none of them guarantee any result, the reality is some make it, and some don’t even with conventional treatments. 

      I am by no means saying Elvira is something that works….but neither does most of the conventional treatment.

    • Shane* says:

      02:37pm | 07/11/12

      Conspiracy theorist nonsense.

      The first Big Pharma company to announce a cure for any cancer will see their share price skyrocket, profits soar, and their executives bathe in piles of cash, Scrooge-McDuck style.

      And since overall cancer survival is now around 64% (up from <40% even three decades ago) , your claim that “most” conventional treatment doesn’t work… well… it is demonstrably false.

    • K^2 says:

      03:16pm | 07/11/12

      @Shane - Coincidence theory nonsense.

      “And since overall cancer survival is now around 64% (up from <40% even three decades ago) , your claim that “most” conventional treatment doesn’t work… well… it is demonstrably false. ”  Also up are deaths reported to be from cancer, and diagnosis of cancer, and early detection of cancer - all these things can lead to more effective treatment, it doesn’t at all mean that the system works better than it used to.

      I’ve seen what cancer does to someone, I’ve seen them told by many oncologists they had high rate of success, I’ve then seen that person fade away to a skeletal face, and a fluid bloated lower body when their kidneys shut down due to the chemo.  I’ve watched a person waste away lied to by doctors that they could be saved, endure a year of torturous chemo only to “relapse” 2 weeks after being cleared of tumors, and pass within 3 months of the relapse.  Please spare me your “conspiracy theory” horsesh*t until you watch it all fail right before your eyes.

    • Kassandra says:

      03:20pm | 07/11/12

      @K^2: Rubbish.

      When I was a medical student the survival rate for childhood leukemia, the most common cancer in children, was less than 50%. Now it is over 90%.

      Look up some figures for the survival rates in various kinds of cancers and how they have changed over the years as treatments have improved, not only from drug treatments but from other treatments as well, notably radiotherapy. You will be surprised.

    • K^2 says:

      03:35pm | 07/11/12

      @Kassandra - ok so my personal experience watching a relative fade away while receiving “conventional” cancer treatment and being told she had high chance of survival etc etc etc is all rubbish.  Ok then…you’re right cos your (incomplete?) medical degree tells you lukemia survival rates are higher…yep…sure thing love.

    • GigaStar says:

      03:43pm | 07/11/12

      K^2 - you’re only basing your assumptions off seeing one person die from cancer. You haven’t given any statistics or numbers to back up your assumptions.

      ” Please spare me your “conspiracy theory” horsesh*t until you watch it all fail right before your eyes.” I’m sorry to be harsh - not everyone survives cancer but that doesn’t mean that anything failed. It’s a fatal illness so of course no treatment can guarantee a result. I’m afraid your grief is blinding you to the medical facts.

    • Dman says:

      04:07pm | 07/11/12

      @K^2

      While your personal experience is tragic, don’t make the mistake of thinking that your experience means that modern day treatments for cancer are ineffective. Unfortunately, few treatments are 100% effective in 100% of cases. Your story is just one anecdote in the millions of stories of people who’ve been affected by cancer, a large proportion of whom are alive today because of the increasing efficacy of modern treatment.

    • Vicki PS says:

      04:08pm | 07/11/12

      K^2, did any of the conventional medical specialists ever say that your relative had a 100% chance of a cure?  I’m quite certain they didn’t.  A “high rate of success” also means a low rate of failure, doesn’t it?  It’s very sad that your relative was one of the failures, but that doesn’t negate all the successes.  Why would you want to turn a personal tragedy into a major conspiracy?  Should I tell my relative who has had successful treatment of his cancer that he’s only imagining that he’s fit and well?

    • Chris L says:

      04:25pm | 07/11/12

      The fact remains that even a 99% chance of survival equates to a 1% change of morbidity.

      It is sad that this person died, K^2, but being told they had a good chance at survival was not the same as a guarantee, and it was not a lie.

    • K^2 says:

      04:29pm | 07/11/12

      @Gigastar - do you mean those same medical facts that are funded results paid for by the pharma companies that supply the ‘medicines’?  Is it the same medical facts and findings you are referring to?  How about those people that have survived cancer using only natural therapies then?  Why are you so quick to dismiss other possibilities and furthermore, why do you think you have any kind of right to force the only “approved” medical options on anyone in that situation where they literally choose their poison?! 

      Most doctors will tell you its almost impossible to predict how any cancer will react to any given ‘approved’ treatments, because they just don’t know.  If its so bloody awesome, I hope no one you know ever has to be told how awesome it is right before they waste away and pass on. 

      My grief has nothing to do with the bleedingly obvious, demonstrable, statistically backed up facts that none of the statistics bloody matter versus cancer.  All bets are off with conventional AND unconventional treatments.  You tell me that oh survival rates are up from 40% to 64% (which conveniently ignores other factors involved in manipulating and/or altering this statistic)  Well, thats still 36% that are guaranteed death so its hardly “good science” either is it and that is my point which you seem to ignore what I am saying and focus on some kind of conspiracy horseshit that I said nothing about.

      Chemo is LITERALLY poisoning yourself to try and kill off the cancer virus, its side effects are horrific, let alone potentially life threatening if mismanaged also. I think you’ll find most doctors will admit when it comes to cancer they really dont know how to treat it and none of the treatment guarantees success all they can do is go off what worked for some (but conveniently dont tell you it killed almost half of their other participants).

      Not to mention the other junk they pump you full of (morphine etc) which will eventually cause your organs to fail.  When your time comes, I guarantee you will question all the ‘pharma science’ too - I hope whichever you choose works for you, but it shouldnt matter what treatment somebody wants, if it makes them feel better somehow then its beneficial.  Placebo - according to your beloved statistics, are often just as effective as the drugs when people ‘perceive’ they are being treated.  Riddle me that big pharma supporter

    • James1 says:

      04:32pm | 07/11/12

      “ok so my personal experience watching a relative fade away while receiving “conventional” cancer treatment and being told she had high chance of survival etc etc etc is all rubbish.”

      No, it is a valid observation.  But it is just that, an observation.  As such, it is only anecdotal evidence, and cannot be used as the basis for an argument or extrapolated on without other supporting evidence.  Given that the evidence of cancer statistics actually shows that modern detection and treatment methods have led to a much higher survival rate than previously, your anecdotal evidence actually bucks the trend, and thus must be rejected as not significant in terms of determining the efficacy of modern cancer treatments.

      This is why more universities and high schools need to teach methodology and epistemology.

    • K^2 says:

      04:40pm | 07/11/12

      @Vicki - “did any of the conventional medical specialists ever say that your relative had a 100% chance of a cure?”

      This is my point, there is no 100% cure even with conventional treatment.
      So why does it matter if someone gets whatever treatment they want, none of them guarantee success, all that should matter is the comfort of the sufferer - of course its preferable to have valid treatment, but a 40% fail rate in pretty much every other medical trial will get your drug banned from the market, not so with cancer treatment drugs tho.

      The sad truth is this “personal” tragedy is not so personal when you look at the numbers of “conventionally treated” cancer sufferers dying on a daily basis is it?

      “Should I tell my relative who has had successful treatment of his cancer that he’s only imagining that he’s fit and well? ”  You can tell him what you like, but you can not definitively say that his recovery was due to his treatment can you?  Perhaps it was his mind set, perhaps his body fought off the cancer whilst he was being treated, perhaps divine intervention - you just cant know can you?

    • Dman says:

      04:50pm | 07/11/12

      K^2, so when will you be happy? When doctors and scientists develop a treatment that is 100% effective for 100% of patients 100% of the time? An increase in survival rates from 40% to 64% within 30 years is HUGE and while we’re not at a stage yet where we can guarantee survival for cancer patients, we can give them a very high chance of survival. And yes, as you know from personal experience, this also means a small chance of death, but that doesn’t mean that the treatment AS A WHOLE across the entire patient population is ineffective.

    • K^2 says:

      04:53pm | 07/11/12

      @James1 - “Given that the evidence of cancer statistics actually shows that modern detection and treatment methods have led to a much higher survival rate than previously” But its still not a cure is it?  Just like Elvira, it worked (possibly?) for some, and (probably?) not for others.  Whats the difference?  One is hocus pokus, the other is no less hocus pokus because it just doesnt work 100% of the time either.  In fact cancer morbidity rates are still alarmingly high, so conventional treatments are not that great either.

      Furthermore your own statement mentions that detection methods are higher - which could be the only contributing factor in reduction of mortality rates, because often tumors are surgically removed chemo and radio are used to kill off any bits of virus that broke away.  So catching it earlier could be the ONLY contributing factor to higher survival rates, because its cut away before it spreads….you can’t answer that can you, no you can just dismiss it as “anecdotal”

    • Dman says:

      04:55pm | 07/11/12

      And for the record K^2, while placebos may be as effective as SOME treatments for SOME illnesses, there has been no evidence at all that placebos are effective in the treatment of cancer.

    • Richard says:

      06:53pm | 07/11/12

      @K^2, I’m with you buddy, 100%. People need to have the freedom to choose their own path and what happens to their own body.

      My own personal opinion is that chemo drugs are poisonous, and I would never ever ever consent to have them administered to me, except for perhaps only a very short 2~3 week course max.

      So, I work very hard to stave off cancer by leading a healthy life, and I suggest everyone else does as well. Focus on using Natural Medicine to Maximise Wellness, instead of using poisonous Conventional Medicine to destroy disease (along with large parts of your health forever as well…)

    • Rowdy says:

      01:59pm | 07/11/12

      There’s no happy ending here…..

    • Pattem says:

      02:12pm | 07/11/12

      Being in a room or NOT when an accident happens makes you no less culpable under OHS regulations.  Elvira should have a PIN thrown at her business.

    • Chris L says:

      02:24pm | 07/11/12

      I wouldn’t expect that anyone needs all that much education to know that blood flows through veins, arteries and capillaries. Pretty much predetermined pathways that aren’t going to change under a massage.

      I’m a bit perplexed at how this scam was possible, but then again I think the same of Scientology.

    • Joe201 says:

      02:33pm | 07/11/12

      “I wanted to understand Elvira better, to understand how she draws these crowds of true believers.”

      ... because humans r dum. And once you understand that, politics suddenly makes sense too.

    • Gregg says:

      02:45pm | 07/11/12

      ” One man allegedly subjected a patient to “vaginal blowing”, another allegedly said she could “kill the worms” that cause cancer. “

      And then there was Elvira. People spoke about her in hushed tones. Some reverential, some secretive, some angry.

      Elvira Brunt
      Suppose there could be a jingle of sorts there, Elvira Brunt,  a Queen of sorts but you’ll not get me blowing up your ........

      There have in fact been some remarkable massage/manipulation people about if nothing to do with cancer and they can think they have a Gift from God!
      A Billy Mitchell, formerly a trainer at South Melbourne Football Club probably about 50+ years ago I went to about forty years ago when he was probably then about 70+ and he was a bit of a talker in believing himself that God had given him a gift for he certainly had self developed skills that were so well recognised throughout the footy and other sporting associations of Melbourne.

      I was near crippled when I got in to see him and he fixed up what was probably some kind of a ruptured joint in the pelvic structure, something that doctors were non the wiser about, even with an Xray and yet so simple to fix even if it did take quite a few weeks to fully heal but that was not too surprising seeing as I had the problem deteriorate over a number of months.

      It was a decade or so later with something of a re-occurrence and having a great chiropractor recommended, one who knew what to look for in a crook lower back Xray that I was able to fully appreciate what Bill had known to do just by observing the way I walked and using his hands to feel for something abnormal and then to correct it.

    • IJ says:

      03:12pm | 07/11/12

      A number of years ago a friend of mine had a brain tumour, had it operated on, then radiation treatment. It came back again and he went to WA to a Dr Holy who treated it with his microwave treatment. Came back to Melbourne, went to the hospital and had a scan and it was all gone. The medical people her would have nothing further to do with him because of the treatment he had had. 12 months later it came back at the back of his scull, Dr Holt told him that his treatment wouldn’t work there because of the bone density. My friend died some months later. My friends sister-in-law, who was a nurse, went with him to WA because she was a sceptic, she came back convinced the the Dr had a cure for some cancers. Govt inquiry into his treatments claimed he didn’t have a cure. Too many people making to much money from cancer cures, I think

    • Emergency Physician says:

      05:24pm | 07/11/12

      As is so often the case, Tim Minchin says it best -

      “It couldn’t be mistaken attribution of causation, born of a coincidental temporal correlation, exacerbated by a general lack of education vis-a-vis physics in Sam’s parish congregation. And it couldn’t be that all these pious people are liars. It couldn’t be an artifact of confirmation bias, a product of groupthink, a mass delusion, an Emperor’s New Clothes-style fear of exclusion.”

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter