Some time in 2003, John Howard bowed to the bleeding obvious when he formally declared the Work/Family issue to be a barbecue stopper. In the end, though, Mr Howard chose to do nothing to help Australian barbecues run more smoothly.

Thr toughest juggling act. Illustration: John Tiedemann.

Indeed, his WorkChoices adventure dramatically reduced the capacity of Australians to balance their lives with the demands of paid work. Leave entitlements were jeopardised, the power of employers to impose particular rostering arrangements was enhanced, and job security plummeted.

At about the same time, Tony Abbott showed similar disdain for working families when he promised that a paid maternity leave scheme would happen over their Government’s “dead body”.

Happily for Australian families, that Government is now a corpse - but the disdain continues in the ghosts that haunt the Opposition front bench.

The difficulty Australians face balancing their work and personal lives is, to a great degree, a product of the highly competitive, globalised society Australia has become. No government is in a position to turn back the clock to a more relaxed time. A government can, however, pursue a suite of measures that helps guide employers and workers in a direction that maintains the dynamism of the modern Australian economy while preserving a culture that nurtures well-adjusted family environments.

The University of South Australia has now published three editions of the Australian Work and Life Index (AWALI). Unsurprisingly, perhaps, all three surveys have found that parents have worse work/life interaction than others. Reflecting their even greater share of domestic and parenting responsibilities, mothers fare worse than fathers; and single mothers fare worst of all. The 2008 survey found that fully 74% of mothers in paid work feel rushed and pressed for time “often or almost always”.

There are patently obvious reasons why governments should consider policies to improve the sense of balance Australians feel in their lives. A community that feels the way the AWALI survey describes is not the future Australia wants or needs, but the dynamics at play are many and varied, and some are controversial. The economic and social imperatives (including such complicated areas as early childhood development) often pull in different directions. The one reliable lodestar for Governments is to give Australians a greater sense of control over their own lives in order to deal with those choices.

The principal economic factor in this area is labour supply or participation. The Intergenerational Report has made it clear that we need to increase workforce participation to counter the challenge of an ageing population.

Generally speaking, labour participation (particularly among primary carers, usually women) will increase if work is able to be balanced with family responsibilities. Australia’s female participation rate, while about 10th among OECD nations overall, ranks much lower for women of child-bearing age. And, as the Productivity Commission pointed out in 2006, that figure overstates Australia’s relative labour supply given that we have one of the highest rates of part-time employment among females in the OECD. The principal social factor, it goes without saying, is the desire to have happy and nurturing family environments for children.

The Rudd Government is working to remove the barriers to workplace participation. Julia Gillard has increased the Child Care Rebate to 50%, paid quarterly. Fair Work includes as one of the 10 National Employment Standards the right of parents to request flexible work arrangements. That entitlement was modelled on UK legislation which has been shown to improve workplace cultures in this area significantly. The reflection of such a right in legislation will, I’m sure, make many workers feel more confident about submitting requests to their employer that would better equip them to discharge their family responsibilities. Such a request might be as straightforward as taking a shorter lunch break in order to be able to leave work earlier to pick kids up from school.

Perhaps most notably, though, the Rudd Government is introducing a paid parental leave scheme to operate from 1st January next year. Our 2009 Budget adopted the recommendations of the Productivity Commission to fund the scheme and legislation will be introduced very shortly.

The provision of statutory, paid leave is long overdue. Australia is one of only two OECD nations, the other being the United States, not to have such a scheme. The Rudd Government scheme is fully costed, fully funded and a clear commitment.

All that is clear about Opposition policy on parental leave is that it is completely unclear. Announcements that aren’t announcements, no costings, no consistency, no commitment. Australia’s parents deserve more than political games.

The significant economic and social challenge of family/work balance responds to practical measures. The Rudd Government is busy implementing those measures. After 11 years of inaction, Australia’s working families are on the way to finding a better balance in their lives.

Most commented

16 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Liz says:

      07:30am | 16/02/10

      Of course they do, life’s about balance and compromise.If you’re going to have kids you have to make some sacrifices if you’re to be a good parent.Working long hours never made a good parent of a man or a woman.Neither did a big salary.Parenting is about being there and concentrating on the kids.

    • Rennie says:

      03:31pm | 16/02/10

      The fear in the Labor Government front bench is palpable, they have all started parroting on the message that the Libs will bring back Work Choices.

      The Labor spinners’ attacks like this scream desperation, especially when the Libs haven’t even raised the issue.

      Fact - this Work Choices scare campaign is solely Labor driven, the Libs have not released anything.

      Kevin is wobbling, having lost 10% of his popularity in the past few months alone. Attacks like this are knee jerk reactions from a party that is facing the very real situation of being a one term wonder.

      Pity all Kevin’s election promises (like this one) have been broken, or pushed back and back.

      This muppet Mark Butler is happy to roll out the same bulldust, claiming maybe some time next year is confirmation of Labor doing anything.

      Where is the legislation Mark?

      Again, a case of too much talk and spin, no real action from Labor.

      Incidentally, you trip yourself up when you say “Indeed, his (John Howard’s) WorkChoices adventure dramatically reduced the capacity of Australians to balance their lives with the demands of paid work”.

      Then lower down “The difficulty Australians face balancing their work and personal lives is, to a great degree, a product of the highly competitive, globalised society Australia has become”.

      Complete contradiction, maybe you should proof read your stuff when parroting work straight out of the Labor spin room?

    • Adam Diver says:

      07:46am | 16/02/10

      “The Rudd Government scheme is fully costed, fully funded and a clear commitment.” as oppossed to many unclear commitments?

      “and legislation will be introduced very shortly. ” Clearly defined timeline is good to see.

      “The Rudd Government is busy implementing those measures.” A vague sweeping statement of action with no clear information on what such measures are or what job the government is doing in implementing them. Guess we will just have to take your word for it.

      How about making such announcements after you have actually done something such as introduce legislation?

      I am not defending the libs (chong and persephone I am talking to you) just cant stand political garbage.

    • Andy says:

      08:06am | 16/02/10

      Straight out of Rudds handbook, especially the last 2 paragraphs almost word for word. Your a good parrott. Polly want a craka?

    • Jason says:

      09:24am | 16/02/10

      Let’s thank Andy for his point-by-point, detailed analysis.

    • Kim says:

      02:08pm | 16/02/10

      Mark, is the labour party paying you?

    • Simon says:

      03:55pm | 16/02/10

      So is blaming the previous government, and ignoring the fact that Rudd has had more than three years to act on this (which was a supposedly fully costed, etc. promise before he was elected).

      Spin spin and more spin.

    • Sherlock says:

      08:44am | 16/02/10

      As a single person I haven’t noticed any difference to my work/family balance. Oh hang on, you mean family as in mum,dad and the kids. OK perhaps some of Mr Rudd’s “Working Families” can tell us how their work/family balance has improved under Labor because none of the people with kids I know are singing the governments praises on this issue.

      Anyway, one thing I can tell you, improving “Working Families” work/family balance will only mean more work for the rest of us

    • Bluecollarworker says:

      08:55am | 16/02/10

      I definatly won’t be voting Liberal, they lie, they attack ,they lie ,they attack, and the repitition goes on I heard some idiot on AM Agenda this morning saying “Abbott will not bring workchoices back” Yeah sure as if we believe that, he will just change the name and on it will go again. If you do a hard days work and I know many who come here don’t. The last thing you need is to vote for a party who will cost you wages due to time out on the streets marching. I have a morgage and a family to support. I won’t put myself in that position again

    • Jack Thomas says:

      03:13pm | 16/02/10

      Thanks for that insightful piece, I was going to say it was from Labor junior lackey posting in his lunchbreak but then no one with even half a brain woud waffle on like you did.

      I look forward to seeing you appear on the next Labor TV ad ranting one eyed nonsense about whatever the Labor spinners tell you.

      When exactly did you vote Liberal? When exactly did it cost you wages to attend a protest march?

      Flog.

    • Luke says:

      09:35am | 16/02/10

      If you want to be out on the streets marching then vote Labor. A vote for Labor is a vote for the Union. Unions love nothing better than a good march and a few days off work. Your “outrageous” union fees are being fed to the Labor Government as donations, buying themselves more power. As for work choices, it had more good points than bad. Thats if your not a unionist. The unions scare campaign before the last election over work choices worked for them. I doubt very much that the next scare campaign they’re organising against Abbott will have the same affect. Have you already noticed the increase in strike action again since the change of system? Stikes came to a stop under work choices. There will be more marching on the streets to come, thanks Julia. I know of very few people who were actually affected by work choices.

    • Matt says:

      09:35am | 16/02/10

      The best thing the Rudd Government could do for work/life balance would be to keep their election promises to bring down grocery and petrol prices and keep interest rates low. Instead they are going to make everything a lot more expensive with the ETS.

      They could also stop promoting the “big Australia” Rudd wants and drastically reduce immigration which would take pressure off housing prices. Then we wouldn’t need to earn so much to just get by.

      Workchoices had one major flaw - the allowable minimum wages and conditions were set too low. However, in practice those on AWAs were earning the most. The flexibility of it saved jobs in the so called GFC.

      It’s interesting that the Unions are continuing to run the Workchoices scare campaign when the most underpaid workers are nurses, teachers and police on Union negotiated awards.

    • Dave says:

      09:13pm | 16/02/10

      As a health worker who saw the affects of Work Choices on people in the health system [and I mean patients, not colleagues] I will say this - Work Choices was a poor system for the health of Australians.  People traded away their award protected rights - sick leave etc -  for slight pay rises.  Then when they got sick they had to discharge against medical advice to go back to work so they could continue servicing their mortgage.  Patients were coming down from mine sites in NW WA with heart attack symptoms and rushing back on site because they weren’t being paid. 

      While this is clearly the workers fault for getting loans they can’t easily service, their trading off of sick leave caused unhealthy workers to go back to work.

    • Jenni says:

      01:20pm | 16/02/10

      While I support the idea of a work/life balance for parents, they also need to be realistic about how far businesses can go to facilitate this.

      When I was a store manager I interviewed many people (both single and coupled parents) who seemed to think it entirely reasonable for me to rearrange the entire work roster to suit their requirements. Many of these thought I could somehow magically give them a shift of 9am (or whenever they arrive arrive after dropping the kids off) to 2.30pm (so they had plenty of time to pick the kids UP) and yet still somehow stretch that into “fulltime work”.

      Some parents (I said SOME, not all, before anyone leaps down my throat) have completely unrealistic expectations of the operational requirements of running a business, and they need to amend their thinking before they begin bleating about how “unfair” their work/life balance is!

    • Adam Diver says:

      02:43pm | 16/02/10

      I would love to see some employees (which I am one) do a roster at thier place of work.

    • Peter says:

      04:03pm | 16/02/10

      Is there an Election coming, Mark?

      Sorry forgot - there is two,  one in your state.

      I have read the same   mantra from six (ALP) politicians in the last 24 hrs.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

Hurray racism is fixed no protesters at anti-Islam demonstration http://t.co/hRFbZq8u9h

ToryShepherd

OI TWITTER! Need your best misheard lyrics pronto for @891adelaide's #thebuzz! Hit me, please!

Daniel Piotrowski

@SquigglyRick I really meant without me writing any news

Daniel Piotrowski

Bloody big week at @newscomauHQ, especially with the tornado and the gay marriage issue. Here's to a weekend without news.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter