The toxic oil spill in the Bay of Plenty will leave tonnes of dirty, sticky fuel on New Zealand beaches.

Trail of destruction. Pic: Getty Images

The clean up will continue today, even as “fist-sized patties about 5mm high” continue to wash up, with the weather hampering efforts to battle the spill from the crashed cargo ship Rena. It’s a looming environmental disaster.

Authorities can’t use booms to stop the spread because of the ocean conditions, and are hoping dispersants will reduce the damage. There is also some speculation marine microbes could help.

Maritime NZ has the latest on the crisis here, and the excellent folk at the New Zealand Science Media Centre have collected the following from experts:

Professor Ravi Naidu, Managing director of the Co-operative Research Centre For Contamination Assessment And Remediation Of The Environment, SA, says:

This spill could impact on the sensitive aquatic environment and life cycle of the marine ecosystem. The oil will not disappear quickly… it will be in the aquatic environment for a while. There are volatile hydrocarbons in the oil which will disperse but the oil which is not removed will continue to have an effect.

There will be some natural remediation by microbes in the coastal environment, but it may be found that these are not as active as they are in warmer tropical waters. Oil which is bound to organic matter in the sediments may be the easiest to break down—the wave action will be an advantage.

Marine ecologist Associate Professor Mark Costello, at Auckland University’s Leigh Marine Laboratory, says:

[Effectiveness of the microbes] seems to depend on what type of oil it is, and what type of environment it is, as the physical environment breaks it into smaller pieces. Dispersants, like a lot of detergents, will kill animals and plants as well. Some of the new ones may be safer, but I don’t know how safe they are. You do get natural oil and gas leaks in various parts of the world. The marine microbes which break down oil slicks seem to be pretty cosmopolitan and they break down lumps of oil in other places.

“I know people have sprayed nutrients such as nitrogen on beaches to try and speed up the growth of bacteria that would help degrade the oil—but as far as I know this has been experimental and it’s not yet clear whether it has any effect in degrading the oil faster. The nutrients could have their own knock-on effect.

It’s only early days, but already birds have died, and penguins and possibly seals and a dog have been affected. People have been told to stay away from the beach, and to avoid fish that may have come into contact with the 5km slick. It’s still not clear why the ship, which had had deficiencies noted previously, ran aground. We’ll keep you updated.

12 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • fairsfair says:

      09:41am | 11/10/11

      I’m going to sound like a knob saying this, but why hasn’t somone invented some sort of vacuum boat? A catamaran type vessel that can travel over the top fo the slick, skim it off the top, pump the water out and then store the oil. I know it would not be the single solution, but in conjunction with the spraying and the shore clean ups etc surely it would make some sort of difference?

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      03:11pm | 11/10/11

      Didnt Kevin Costner try that and failed?

    • Mark G says:

      10:35am | 11/10/11

      Fairsfair,

      because filtering oil out of water is a lot more difficult than that. The boat’s capacity would have to be almost as big as the ship that spilt to make a difference because it would have to take both oil and contaminated water. Its not like putting the water through a siv because both water and oil will go through most filters. There are similar things to what you are suggesting with net type arrays that prevent the oil from spreading but thats about the best you can do. The remainder is the slow process of clean up that you see going on.

    • fairsfair says:

      11:00am | 11/10/11

      Thanks Mark. I was thinking along the lines of a cane harvester type situation - where the harvester only cuts and then shifts the product on to bins that are rotated when full. So why couldn’t a filter boat do the onboard work and pump the oil into another tanker nearby and the water back into the ocean. That way it would control is intake at its determined capacity.

      I am sure if it could be done, someone would have done it by now though. Plus, I guess the filtration would have to be chemical based and that brings with it other risks. I am just amazed by what can be achieved at sea. Like vessel based LNG processing plants - why can’t we some how develop a clean up crew.

    • iansand says:

      01:47pm | 11/10/11

      fairsfair - It would be like developing a filter to separate the liquid components of salad dressing.  Salad dressing and oil and water are emulsions and would require the same sort of technology to separate.  In time, the component parts will separate out but it takes time and no agitation for it to happen but it would be very difficult to do on the flly.

    • Tezza says:

      11:07am | 11/10/11

      Considering how popular the “Gaia” myth is these days (“mother nature will fight back”), it always amazes me how little the greenies and alarmists credit nature with any capacity of resilience.
      My advice is do nothing about the oil spill and everything will be o.k. Spraying dispersants is possibly the worst thing that could be done. I can’t cite the references but I understand that most oil spill disasters (the Torrey Canyon, the Alaskan one, the recent Texas Gulf one) show little evidence of long term environmental damage. Oil is a natural product, produced by microbes in the first place. The little blighters love it and will happily munch it up given time. Big lumps will either settle to the bottom and get covered in sediment, or float ashore and get covered in beach sand. Either way you wouldn’t know they are there (unless you tread on one). The more volatile and oilier bits might kill a few penguins or sea birds if they come into contact, but hey, remember that nature is red in tooth and claw - these animals have a limited life expectancy and a high death toll from other causes anyway.

    • andye says:

      02:10pm | 11/10/11

      @Tezza - ” it always amazes me how little the greenies and alarmists credit nature with any capacity of resilience.”

      Oh the planet will bounce back eventually from most anything, given a few billion years. I think you will find it is man and all the other species currently occupying this planet that are in danger.

      For example, the last time that carbon levels rose dramatically on earth 90% of all species died. It was due to lots and lots of volcanoes back then, but man currently produces 130 times as much carbon as all the volcanoes on earth. That mass extinction made the dinosaur one look like nothing. They font call it “The Great Dying” for nothing.

      Yet mother nature bounced back… eventually. So I guess you are right.

    • Mickey T says:

      02:13pm | 11/10/11

      I assume you’re trolling Tezza? Well you caught me.

      “Oil is a natural product” - Yes it is, but not when it’s leaking from a stricken container ship sitting on a well-documented reef, we normally extract it deep from in the planet, not by natural means, but by drilling.

      “I can’t cite the references but I understand that most oil spill disasters (the Torrey Canyon, the Alaskan one, the recent Texas Gulf one) show little evidence of long term environmental damage” - Of course you can’t cite references…Authorities are still surveying damage done by the Exxon Valdez disaster, twenty years on, as they are with the Gulf of Mexico disaster, I suppose it comes down to what your definition of long term is.

      “The little blighters love it and will happily munch it up given time” - I suggest tonight, you fill your bath with motor oil and take a soothing bath, you may even want to consume some of it for your supper.

    • John Smythe says:

      02:14pm | 11/10/11

      Bay of Plenty properties going to drop? Been eyeing property there for sometime smile

    • fairsfair says:

      03:55pm | 11/10/11

      Ah, from glowing rock to covered rock! You do live the high life JS wink Hows the serenity? LOL

    • gnome says:

      09:11pm | 11/10/11

      So here’s a non-punch quick guide-.  The whole fuel load on the ship was equivalent to about a minute and a quarter’s delivery from the deepwater horizon spill, which has been forgotten now that it was about a year ago and caused no effect.  A non-event blown out of all proportion.

      A professional news organisation might include such detail as quantity spilled, quantity available to be spilled, area of spill, area and depth of spill etc, but I guess a punch quick guide doesn’t need to worry about mere facts.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@KevCorduroy @ceda_news Cheers, couldn't get on to them but Redmond's office helped out in the end!

ToryShepherd

Does half the population really want to close the borders?? http://t.co/cNmpV2qH

Paul Colgan

In which Schapelle Corby is Photoshopped as Joan of Arc http://t.co/08UWH6yq

Paul Colgan

@karalee_ yeah, have concluded same after cursory look at a few. Scary that some brands might actually use them

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Schapelle has done her time

Schapelle has done her time

Schapelle Corby has served more than seven years in Kerobokan prison for attempting to import 4.2 kilos…

Do women need to know when to walk away?

Do women need to know when to walk away?

Opposition Leader Isobel Redmond has sparked controversy over her advice that young women should sometimes…

Who murdered the Arts degree?

Who murdered the Arts degree?

Have we murdered the liberal arts education? That was the final question on Monday night’s Q&A…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter