I keep hearing how we have dodged a bullet.  How the stewardship and steely nerve of our Prime Minister and the gang of four averted a recession (the GFC, so called, if you like acronyms), and how the RSPT (another acronym) is going to fix all our ills and bring the nasty billionaire miners to heel and “make them pay their fair share”. 

They have no idea what it's like. Illustration: Jon Kudelka

He’s got cred after all, he wrote an essay on the evils of unbridled markets and the greedy speculators in the monthly, and how the age of the neo-con was over and the social democrats would restore balance to public policy.

The problem is that from where I am situated as the owner of a modestly small electrical contracting firm that is responsible for the livelihoods of 5 people, things aren’t that great.

Work is very, very slow and we have had our two apprentices on holidays for a couple of weeks because we simply don’t have the work in front of us. 

Furthermore, to use a vernacular term he is “cutting someone else’s grass”, and to mangle the English language even more and para-phrase Forrest Gump, “I may not be a smart man…. but I know what bullshit is”. 

Kevin Rudd has over promised and under delivered on just about everything ... grocery prices, fuel prices, indigenous disadvantage, homelessness, pokie machines, whaling, housing affordability, carbon trading, government advertising (cancer on our democracy), binge drinking, stopping boat people, education revolution, laptop per student, “I’m a fiscal conservative”, etc, etc, etc.

This mob are relying on the groundwork laid by the Howard government.  Forgetting the back down on the CPRS (long winded stupid acronym), my beef is with the fig leaf of the GFC, the RSPT, the massive debt, the waste and the winding back of the single biggest factor in our resilience as a domestic economy in labour market flexibility. 

I will briefly try and explain in my reasoning on these themes.

I reckon the melt down in global markets was not the fault of people who create value and make things, i.e manufacturers, miners, intellectual property etc, it was the folly of banks and traders bundling up packets of nothing, and playing a game of pass the parcel with them until all the chairs were gone. 

Now if there was to be a “super profits tax” for a sector of the world economy that was more culpable for the problems of the GFC, surely it should be the banks and not the mining companies. 

The banks received government/taxpayer support and guarantees, and the single biggest sector of our economy that held our heads above water was the mining industry.  The banks get to keep making their “super profits” and the miners get to wear a retrospective tax for making a paltry 6% return on their investment. 

If your super fund was only making 6% on your investment you would be looking to shift your money to a fund or investment that was doing better.  That is exactly what will happen to investment in the mining industry, and the only reason that the government is picking on the resource sector is that they can’t take their existing operations “physically” offshore. 

If they tried it on the banks, with a few clicks of a mouse money would be fleeing our shores to investments that didn’t attract the burden of this tax.  These blokes have spent too much money and looked around for an easy target, and tried to sell their tax grab with a good ole’ class envy, bosses vs workers argument. 

I am not advocating for our banks to be slugged, nor am I denigrating the prudent way in which Australian banks have managed their investment practices (due to good regulation), I am merely making the point that sectors with “bricks and mortar” are far easier to hit than the very fluid nature of modern finance. 

If I hear one more government minister intone solemnly about the dire economic consequences of the GFC and how we alone out of advanced western economies… blah, blah, blah… I think will put my size 13 steel capped boot through the tele (old fashioned tube type, not plasma bought with $900 cheques). 

The absolutely bleeding obvious is that they were left with money in the bank, without the budget surplus, well regulated banking system, and labour market flexibility, we would have been no different to the other western style democracies. 

To use another vernacular, we would of been “wallaby ted’s cousin”.  When Peter Costello talked about a tsunami on wall street he was scoffed at by Rudd and Swan, and they talked of the inflation genie having to be corked back into its bottle. 

I have no doubt that a Howard or Costello government would of stimulated the economy during the downturn, but I bet my leftie it would of been smaller and programs like the BER (another bloody acronym) would of had more of a focus on local control over the money rather than a cookie cutter approach.

With the centralised big business focus of the program, I don’t know of many small firms who actually shared in the BER stimulus bounty.  The mythology built up around the response the GFC by the ALP using the BER to stimulate the GNP and as an excuse to dump the CPRS, and raise money therefore by a RSPT to fill the hole in the budget caused by the PM, is just BS.

Finally, there are more people today who are self employed than are members of a union.  This is a very large reason why we have been able to absorb the shock of the GFC. 

In the real world outside of the 30 something’s in PM’s inner circle and the political apparatchiks who spout knowledge and opinion but are devoid of wisdom or experience, small business is doing it tough, AND small business IS the engine of the economy. 

We have pulled our belts in to the last notch, we have paid wages to staff using our home loans or overdrafts not wanting to put good people out of work who have families and commitments. 

Contrary to the class war bullshit perpetrated by the ALP and unions that bosses are bastards, every single small businessman/person that I know values their staff and takes their responsibilities as an employer very seriously.

Without the amount of self employed people taking a pay cut, without the workplace flexibility for employers to be able to give staff the choice to reduce hours and/or wages to keep an income going until things pick up, I believe we would be in double digit unemployment right now.

I heard Tony Abbot say that “I used to think that the Rudd government made the Howard government look good, now I am starting to think that they make the Whitlam government look good”.  I agree.  Lets hit the reset button, draw a line under this episode in our democracy and get the party of pragmatism, experience and business back in charge of the levers.

Chris Lehmann is a Director of a small electrical contracting firm in Brisbane, that specialises in renovations and extensions. He is a member of his local branch of the LNP (Liberal-National Party).

150 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Brian Taylor says:

      06:22am | 21/06/10

      well written, as a part owner of a small business myself, if Rudd and Co have spare money to throw away, send some my way. it’d help pay for the very high power bills, very high petrol bills, very high food bills etc etc that seemed to have been caused by the labour party’s wasteful spending.
      keep up the good work Chris

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      08:45am | 21/06/10

      T. Chong , raising the spectre of a ficticious ” Workchoices ” won’t cut it .
      Rudd has lost any credibility he may have had , and this analysis from a small business owner brings the focus on to the ” pain ” being experienced ot there in the real world .
      Small Business Minister , Craig Emmerson , is likely to be inundated with this type of analysis in the election lead up , and rightly so , the Rudd govt. has virtually deserted small business since gaining the Treasury benches.
      The electoral anger witnessed over the weekend in N.S.W. is not confined to that state , it is Australia wide.

    • Scot says:

      10:59am | 21/06/10

      TC, Well Chris and Bryan like many of have employees and I can assure you they are all very worried at the erosion of their life styles during this Muppets watch. And this has nothing to do with the rubbish you and Gillard spout. The workers have spoken in western Sydney and the people in the country areas have had a gut full as well. The only thing you can do with Workchoices is get free copies from Rudd in bulk and sell it to the waste people to get spare cash to pay bills.

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      07:48pm | 21/06/10

      Well said, Chris, I couldn’t agree more.  If I had a wish that could come true it would be that the Labor Party would stop using the class warfare nonsense whenever they get into power.  Times have changed (or should have) and we don’t need this nonsense anymore, quite apart from the fact that it is not true anyway.  I was one of many who thought Rudd really had the “X Factor” back in 2007.  This is no longer the case and I can’t wait for him to be out of office.  I’m going back to my Liberal roots and I’m going to stay there.  Labor will never change.

    • T.Chong says:

      06:35am | 21/06/10

      C’mon Chris , you straight talkin true blue cobber, just say straight out that you and other LNP supporters wish to see a return of Workchoices. - see it was simple enough.
      Interesting new L / NP tactict to have someone who presents as a bit rough around the edges - like this author, and those used in the miners ads, in order to imply that they must be “fair dinkum ‘, or so the PR firms hope the punters will believe.

    • Peter says:

      09:03am | 21/06/10

      Fair shake of the sauce bottle Chong,surely you aren’t suggesting that the Labor spin machine is now being copied by others?

    • Nick says:

      09:05am | 21/06/10

      I suppose we will be hearing lots about “workchoices” now that the government has nothing to sell and will resort to using the same old tired tactics it used with the Kev07 campaign.Thankfully the average punter has realized that Labor is all talk and no action.Keep on spinning Chong.

    • T.Chong says:

      09:20am | 21/06/10

      Pete, reckon so digger, both parties are going to be laying it on pretty thick.
      nick, please arrange that paying gig, where Labor pays for my spinning, much the same as the LNP does for you. Cheers.

    • acker says:

      09:23am | 21/06/10

      @T.Chong ..Be careful the term “Work-choices” widely used by Labor last election could be replaced with “Dud-choices” this election by the Lib’s..just as “Phoney-Tony” could be countered by “K-Thud”

    • Lizzie says:

      12:09pm | 21/06/10

      That’s right T. Chong…..you Laborites have nothing to brag about so you throw mud instead.  Where’s your proof that the Libs will bring back Work Choices?? Come on man, show us!!!! Where’s you proof!!

    • M Lander says:

      08:49pm | 21/06/10

      T Chong - don’t know if you know this or not - but small business is exempt from unfair dismissals and a stack of stuff.  Your class warfare ideology is dead - if the best threat to keep labor in is that work choices is coming back you are dreaming.  I voted Labor when Keating and Hawke was in.  Be stuffed if I will vote for this idiot.

    • WKH says:

      06:45am | 21/06/10

      Boy are you going to cop it now Chris…You called it how it is and thats just not done around here…Well written mate and you are spot on with your analysis of the failed man, party and the impact they are having on small business. Waste of time taking anything up with Craig Emerson. He is just an angry old man… I hope the punters take note….

    • Bizniss says:

      10:28am | 21/06/10

      Everything he says is utterly wrong.

      The GFC was caused by an overheated economy fed by consumers who wanted everything. And NOW. On credit card or on debt and never had the means to pay it back.

      It wasn’t the fault of bankers.

      Governments allowed these people to consume and borrow more than they could repay and now they are feeling the heat.

      Australia avoided the worst of it because ironically 13 years of Liberals selling off our assets and not spending the money on infrastructure/schools/hospitals that we desperately needed they held onto it. Rudd’s stimulus package saved us from the worst of it.

      I’d daresay that judging by Chris’ lack of understanding of the global economy that his business is floundering from his lack of business acumen and not Rudd

    • Arnold says:

      11:06am | 21/06/10

      Bizniss, I would suggest you look into banking practices overseas, particularly CDO’s (and associated trading) and non-recourse mortgages.  Then do some research on the oversupply of housing available in the USA.

      Once informed, then please try and argue that bankers were not the reason for the GFC.  Or do you really think that governments should personally approve every loan application in the country?

      To argue that it is the role of governments to restrict how much a private citizen can consume is ridiculous.  Maybe you need big brother looking over your shoulder, but I sure as hell don’t. 

      In saying that, it wasn’t really the miners that saved Australia from going bust (though ongoing demand from China certainly helped), and it definitely wasn’t the federal government’s wasteful stimulus packages.  Funnily enough, it was the Australian banking industry that saved Australia, and the regulations put in places by successive governments.  The proof is in the fact that none of our banks went bust, and comparably few mortgagees went to the wall as well.

      If I were you, Bizniss, I would be careful about questioning someone’s “business acumen” when yours is clearly lacking more than the authors.

    • Brian says:

      11:21am | 21/06/10

      Well said Chris. I find it amusing that Bizniss can actually blame consumers for the GFC. The GFC was caused by banks and finncial institutions giving value to things that had no value. I any man in the street had concocted what the bankers did, they would be in jail for fraud. And the really frightening thing is that these ferals have been supported with out tax dollars - without a thank you or any appreciation. All they are now doing is slugging us with excessive costs, above warranted interest rates and are once again making super profits.
      In my book bankers are the lowest form of life and it is only a pity that we do need them on occasion.

    • Macon Paine says:

      11:36am | 21/06/10

      @ Bizness
      “Everything he says is utterly wrong.”
      Fair enough, please refute each of his points.
      “The GFC was caused by an overheated economy fed by consumers who wanted everything. And NOW. On credit card or on debt and never had the means to pay it back.”
      Well that sort of “I want it all and I want it now” attitude certainly didn’t help but surely your not suggesting that alone was the cause of the GFC?
      “Governments allowed these people to consume and borrow more than they could repay and now they are feeling the heat.”
      Well people who consume and borrow more than they can repay are for want of a better word idiots. It is difficult to legislate against stupidity.
      “Australia avoided the worst of it because ironically 13 years of Liberals selling off our assets and not spending the money on infrastructure/schools/hospitals that we desperately needed they held onto it. Rudd’s stimulus package saved us from the worst of it.”
      Yeah but they had to pay back about $96B in debt remember, could have done a lot with that money. Anyway your argument proves the Liberals probably did the right thing. If they had spent all the money, we would be even further up the creek. Schools and hospitals are state government issues, surely the state governments must take some of the blame?
      “I’d daresay that judging by Chris’ lack of understanding of the global economy that his business is floundering from his lack of business acumen and not Rudd”
      Thats just nasty, no need for that.

    • LJ says:

      11:37am | 21/06/10

      Bizniss at 10:28am - You clearly don’t know what you are talking about… How can you state “Governments allowed these people to consume and borrow “, since when do you apply to the government for a car or house loan, its the banks who lent the money, its the banks who took on those people who couldn’t afford the loans, and it is the banks who cause the GFC when all these people faulted on the loans which they should never of had in the first place. 

      You are obviously one of those people who can’t take responsibility for your own actions and always blame the government or want more handouts from them.

      The stimulus package was a rushed ill thoughout policy that was even worsely managed.  Rudd’s big thought on how to stimulate the economy “oh lets put pink batts in roofs and get a rock n roll singer to manage it”  thats being a fiscal conservative for you. and I wont even start on the cash splash and how much money went oversea, yeah that was a good decision.

      Also, I think people are also forgetting Rudd’s “Earning or learning” policy, of course the figures are going to look better if the unemployed are in training because they are then not included on the unemploymnet figure, so good one for massaging that one.

    • Bizniss says:

      01:34pm | 21/06/10

      Arnold
      As someone that works in tax and finance with extensive business qualification I have comepleted thorough research into the GFC. It was a failure of government to regulate the economy and lending practices. The free economy mantra borne by the Friedmanites since the 70s caused the current situation.

      It IS the role of government to regulate economic activity so that things don’t become overheated. The US government failed to do this. GW Bush and the Fed Reserve pumped the economy full of money after the tech wreck, making credit cheap. People got loans who should not have been able to get loans. There were reports of people earning $30k and getting home loans for $700k. This should not have been allowed to happen.

      We have a strong regulatory framework in this country that prevented much of this from happening. However, to a large extent we were still overheated and the government could have used a combination of fiscal policy and lending restrictions to prevent this. However, the Libs allowed personal debt to become bigger than our own economic output.

      Oh, and you should look at what thet OECD, World Bank and RBA have said about the Australian stimulus package - they all say it saved us. Not the miners.

      Brian, Macon and LJ

      You clearly don’t comprehend what regulation means. The government needs to tighten lending restrictions to prevent this from happening.

      They currently do this to an extent but it should be tightened.

      You can’t expect participants in the marketplace to regulate themselves. Like any sport, game or anything out there (eg road rules), a body needs to set the rules by which play is allowed.

      Pretty simple…...

    • Ferret says:

      03:00pm | 21/06/10

      Bizness, I strongly suggest you take all your business qualifications and shred them, then collect the trash and mail it back to what mail order university you got them from. Also if you DO work in the tax and finance industry, write you letter of resignation and hit the dole queue. You clearly have no idea where the GFC started and by whom…

      I think it strange you blame free market on the GFC when the genesis of it orignated in social engineering concepts brought forth by the Democrats. I would ask for an explanation but I am afraid I would merely be asking a textbook for a page reference.

    • Bizniss says:

      03:15pm | 21/06/10

      Yes, Ferret, I’m sure Today Tonight and A Current Affair have thoroughly educated you on the causes of the GFC.

      The GFC is not a failure at all. It is simply the response of the free market to prevailing conditions that were initially set in the 70s and progressed from there.

      A bit of googling may help you with a few articles….....

    • Faz says:

      07:03am | 21/06/10

      I love it! All you have to do is say, ‘I’m from the ‘real world’ and that gives you instant cred.

      But you’re right Chris, the government shouldn’t have gone into debt to make sure you and your workers had something productive to do while the fan was being hit globally. 

      I can see you would have been much more supportive of Rudd if he’d kept all that Howard surplus in the bank and let you guys go to the wall. That’d be ‘real’, eh Chris?

    • Mick says:

      08:55am | 21/06/10

      Faz its obvious you don’t know what you are talking about.One of the major factors which contributed to employment figures looking not too bad was that most small business owners were able to hold on to staff by reducing their hours without having to sack them.This was possible due to the previous governments introduction of policies which allowed flexibility in the work place.I’m guessing you would like to go back to the good old days where union muscle would of ensured that employers wouldn’t of been able to reduce hours leading to mass lay offs.

    • Nath says:

      09:25am | 21/06/10

      Faz, I think you should re-read what was written. It was only the big building firms that got lll the BER money, not the small businesses who really needed it.

    • Roja says:

      11:35am | 21/06/10

      Mick, remember the legislation that was in place during the GFC was enacted by the ALP not the liberals - work choices had been revoked.  Sure it was much like the way Howard claimed economic credibility for the impact of Keating’s economic reforms, but the liberals simply can’t have it both ways.

      Nath, do BHP, Myers & Westpac install roof insulation?  Did small business refuse to serve customers who were cashed up by the stimulus payments?  Did all of the BER money go to large building firms? No, No and No. 

      Next argument please, this time one based in facts and not soaring rhetoric.  Cheers.

    • Mick says:

      12:44pm | 21/06/10

      Roja.. the the government is yet to rovoke all parts of the Howard work choice agreements and in fact will take up to three to five years before the unions get their way. Perhaps it is you who should get YOUR facts right.

    • Roja says:

      01:29pm | 21/06/10

      Sorry Mick the soaring rheoric was more aimed at Nath’s claims - you were close to the truth.  My point was that regardless of the truth Rudd can and will claim the credit for it since they made changes to it - the majority of the electorate does not believe work choices still exists and perception often equals fact when it comes to politics. 

      I believe that Work Choices was poorly implemented by Howard, with rules that were deliberately made too harsh so that they could water them down later - which sounds like Rudd & the mining tax.  It cost Howard power, however Rudd has chosen a politically smarter target - altbeit a very cashed up one.

    • Matt says:

      07:10am | 21/06/10

      If you had pu the information that the writer is a member of the Liberal-National Party at the top of this article there wouldn’t be two minutes of my life that I’ll never get back.

      What a load of bollocks.

      It’s bad enough having the Wyrd Sisters Bronnie and Sophie writing for The Punch, but now we’ve got local branch members?

      More Penbo, less pollies.

    • Tony K says:

      09:07am | 21/06/10

      Makes lots of sense to me..Perhaps you have one eye closed?

    • Super D says:

      09:10am | 21/06/10

      Maybe you’d be happier reading the article by Ben Heraghty - you have to go to his bio to find out that “back in the day” he was president of young Labor.

    • watty says:

      10:12am | 21/06/10

      Perhaps Rudd could rush through some more “quick fix” Legislation banning anyone from the Coalition and it’s supporters from even commenting on Punch?

    • dovif says:

      10:48am | 21/06/10

      watty

      They already tried, it is called the filter, there are invisible men in a office banning people from seeing things on interenet, that they have refused to classify, and no-one can find out what has been refused classification

      You can ask CONway about it

    • Against the Man says:

      07:37am | 21/06/10

      Rudd has failed so badly, history will be very unkind to him and this generation of Australians for voting in this twitter head. I would be ashamed to be related to Australia’s greatest mistake.

    • Steve says:

      07:53am | 21/06/10

      The Labor party is doing what it always does, spends up big, hikes up taxes to pay for spending spree, blames bosses for everything. 11 years of Labor in NSW and the state has gone backwards, 2.5 years of Labor in Canberra, billions wasted and nothing to show for it except a massive government credit card debt, typical Labor

    • dovif says:

      08:33am | 21/06/10

      There are 2 problems with the RSPT

      It would have been unneeded if the ALP was able to control their spending and not waste so much of it on the rorted insulation and BER schemes, and if they have just monitored the cash splash, so the cash splash was not going to the UK, US, Africa and Asia etc. Rudd had put our nation into $100 billion in debt. The interest on that is going to be $7 to $8 billion a year, that is the main reason that we need more tax revenue, it has nothing to do with future needs, which is what this is been dressed as.

      Secondly, all we need to find out about the future effect of the RSPT is to listen to the ALP.
      Bligh and Fraser, Qld ALP premier and treasurer had both said this will cost jobs in Qld and slow down investments
      Rann and Foley, SA ALP premier and treasurer had both said this will cost jobs in SA and slow down investments
      Ferguson Federal ALP, one of the few ALP members with mining experience, had said that there should have been more consultation and there should be changes
      Crean Federal ALP, had said there should have been more consultation
      Gillard deputy prime minister ALP had said that it was all Rudd and Swann

      It is like rats leaving the sinking ship

      How on earth do you get good policies if you did not speak to anyone in the industry before formulating policies on that industry. They did not speak with the industry body, they did not speak with Forrest who was a friend of the ALP, they did not even speak with Ferguson, one of their own members who has some industry experience. ...... It is just amateur hour in Canberra

    • Bizniss says:

      10:47am | 21/06/10

      The RSPT did come from the MCA. They asked for it during the consultation process of the Henry Tax Review.

      They’re all now whining because it kicks in at 6% rather than the 11-12% that they initially asked for.

      Regardless, these are billion dollar enterprises crying about having to pay a bit of extra tax which will still see them profitable. The scaling back of projects is nothing more than their greed.

      They money they earn is from selling our resources. They shouldn’t complain.

    • Joan says:

      11:39am | 21/06/10

      Are they the same rats as those which Rudd referred to at the ball?

    • Sal says:

      06:43pm | 21/06/10

      Bizniss, if you are such a hot shot business and financial whiz as you would have us believe, why, at 10.47am in the morning, are you not at work ???  Or if you are at work, why are you not working ???

    • Brad says:

      08:32am | 22/06/10

      @Biziniss
      Mate, you’re really looking kind of silly now. Do you realise that every mining venture in Australia, is instantly devalued by around 20%?

      Think about that for a while, and think about the term “soverign risk”.

    • Tim says:

      08:37am | 21/06/10

      Well fair dinkum old cobber, you straight talking son of a gun you. Us people from the “real” world know the score.
      We don’t need no fancy economics analysis when we’ve got “real” world common sense, hey mate?

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      08:39am | 21/06/10

      I wondered when the Australian version of Joe the Plumber would pop up. Honestly can’t the Liberal think up their own election strategies instead of stealing every play from the Republican handbook?

    • T.Chong says:

      09:00am | 21/06/10

      Not only is it the Republican handbook, the LNP has bought the delux hard cover edition of the Sarah Palin guide to politics- the very simplified version.

    • Bruce says:

      09:47am | 21/06/10

      Shane, I can vouch for Chris, I have been his business partner for years, held his ladder,  and helped him fix too many electrical problems fit out too many houses to think of him as a fake. And I didn’t vote LNP! But I am at th coal face with him, and I too have have to make the hard decisions to put off our apprentices as times got tighter. I have no political affiliations except 25 years as a card carrying member of the ETU - so you can see how two blokes with completly differing viewpoints have now drawn the same conclusions from being in the real world. And we are no “Joe the Plumbers”, just two sparkies trying to make a living!

    • Ripa says:

      12:21pm | 21/06/10

      Shane, and T.Chong, you are so ignorant, and you are doing exactly what every socialist bubble brain does when confronted with truth, you resort to “name calling”, where do you think the government gets its money from? Leprechauns?, Genies? sunken treasure? ooooeerrrr, its from us, workers ,entrepreneurs,people who run businesses.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      06:10pm | 21/06/10

      @ Ripa. Not socialist. Ecofascist and more right wing than the Liberal party will ever be. I don’t believe in middle class welfare or corporate welfare.

    • Biff says:

      08:40am | 21/06/10

      The Gang of Four and their running dogs will have to do better.

    • Holly says:

      08:58am | 21/06/10

      Please spare us more of this inane rubbish.  Chris you may not have heard that those who have most of their investments in Australian Mining shares have fared better than those with a broader range of investments in their super since the super profits tax was announced. (Must be true I read it in the West Australian)

      Perhaps you should have read the background reports to the recent Four Corners program on the insulation program.  The Hawke Report points out the success of the program and I also learnt from Four Corners that the employer of two of the men who so tragically died was an electrician, which surprised me.

      Chris goes on to laud small business but I can tell you that many small businesses do not share you ethical view of the world.  My children have been very badly treated in the workplace by small business owners and all of them have been offered “cash” deals at some time or other - I suppose so employers can get around their superannuation payment and other obligations.  When building a home recently I was surprised at the number of small business contractors who were willing to offer cash deals (none of which I accepted) so the black economy is well and truly flourishing. 

      Your chief complaint that comes through is that somehow the stimulus money has not flowed to you.  I can assure you that there are many small business people who do not share your view and as for your sweeping comment that the school stimulus program money all went to large companies and you missed out I can assure you that this was not the case in my state.  I can see a wide variety of builders signs up - presumably a lot of them engaging small business sub contractors judging by the vehicles parked there.

      Asa coalition candidate I expect you to be informed.  Please read the budget papers and be assured the RSPT is not designed to fill a hole in the budget - it is part of a tax reform package.  The reduction in company tax will benefit nearly 770,000 registered companies in this country - not all of them big companies by any means.  These businesses are being leaned on by the Mining companies not to come out in support of the package.  This is not just according to Wayne Swan but was backed by financial commentator on the Insiders program yesterday.

    • Nafe says:

      09:36am | 21/06/10

      What do you mean success of the insulation program. I had my roof inspected by the government and they didn’t even do it, they threw the bags up there, over the top of my downlights and didn’t even open the bags and spread out the insulation. This inspection was 8 weeks ago and still no word on when it is getting fixed. Oh well, if the house burns down its all on the Rudd Government and i will sue them cause waiting 8 weeks or more after they know the dangers is very poor form.

    • AdamC says:

      09:44am | 21/06/10

      Oh please, Holly, tax reform package - are you serious? It is clearly a revolution, not a reform. Just like the education revolution and building the education revolution. The difference, it seems, between reforms and revolutions is that reforms are substantial yet incremental change, while revolutions are much-trumpeted mere tweaks that still manage to end in disaster.

      Kevin Rudd has had a lot of those. Though it seems he still retains his rusted-on cheerleaders, no matter how laughably ridiculous their defence of him is becoming.

    • watty says:

      10:52am | 21/06/10

      The way the RSPT was introduced and the way Rudd Swan and Ludwig bodgied up the $38 million taxpayer funded advertising campaign and had it included in the Budget was nigh on criminal.

      Unlike Hawke and Keating, Rudd didn’t negotiate with the resources industry on major changes to legislation but in his usual cowardly fashion slipped it out on a slow media day.

      Laura Tingle, the financial commentator on “Insiders”, did say she “had heard” similar accusations about the mining companies “threatening’ other companies outside the industry but like Swan would not name names.Tingle has never been known for her support of the mining industry in fact she and her husband Ramsay have been critics for more than 20 years.

      It is a pleasure to hear from the “Hollow Men” so early in the week

       

       

      “Part of a tax reform package”? What happened to the other 100 odd proposals put forward by Henry and Co, who run Treasury.?

    • Bizniss says:

      11:06am | 21/06/10

      Nafe
      The government inspected your roof? Krudd anf Gillard were up in your roof throwing bags around?

      Methinks it was the didgy low-cost contractor you hired to do it. Blaming the government just shows how blind you are.

      AdamC
      Using semantic won’t get you anywhere.

      Holly - well said. Some people clearly don’t like references to appropriate and credible sources. Most people don’t like things unless they are from Today Tonight or A Current Affair. Pitiful.

    • David S says:

      11:06am | 21/06/10

      Holly I was impressed with the fact that the original writer acknowleged his affiliation with the LNP and I was equally unimpressed with your inability to be truthful about your your position with the alp/actu. You have just too much information to be a commoner.

    • Chris Lehmann says:

      11:09am | 21/06/10

      Definitely not a candidate, just a local -party member thanks.  Why would I read the budget papers, and if I did, why would I be assured?  If it is tax reform, why are there so few of the Henry review measures being implemented?  I at least declared my political leanings when I submitted this article, from your comment, and those of many here some declarations may be in order. 
      I didn’t laud all small business people, just those I know personally. 

      And don’t get me started on the foil insulation!  As a sparkie I deal with this stuff all the time, the dangers are very real.  We refused to do the foil inspections because the only safe option is removal, many got on the gravy train for the rebates, we did not.  As someone who climbs in ceilings daily, I can tell you this stuff is inherently dangerous, the safety of my staff and myself is more important.  As far as the Hawke report goes insulation wise it may be OK, but it is unsafe, fullstop.

      I am not complaining that we didn’t get any money from the stimulus, that sort of work is not what we specialise in anyway.  I am making the observation that the climate for small business is much worse than what is being reported.

    • Penrith Panther says:

      11:44am | 21/06/10

      Four Corners? Hilarious Holly. Maybe we should also watch tonight’s episode of Good News Week for more “balanced” views. McDermott and his cohorts will undoubtedly provide us with an another unbiased hour of “entertainment”. I wonder what hilariously knee slapping commentary we’ll see this week. Another Budgie smuggler joke perhaps? A side splittingly clever Work Choices gag maybe? Surely not a Mad Monk gag painting Abbott as a misogynistic dinosaur? You show me one financial commentator in favour of the RSPT as it currently stands and I’ll show you 10 that aren’t. What you call tax reform, I call an opportunistic tax grab to pay down record debt levels of their own making. Come on, just admit you’re an ALP staffer and then I’ll at least understand your stance. Only somebody affiliated with Labor could possibly consider the Home Insulation Program a success. If it was so succeesful why did Garrett lose his job over it? It was an unmitigated disaster and you must have been smirking your backside off while typing that tripe. It appears you may have caught the same disease as your fearless leader. Talk about putting lipstick on a pig.

    • Andrew says:

      11:56am | 21/06/10

      Chris, I recently read somewhere a study from, I think it was Westpac or the Lowy institute that said that more than 45% of small businesses are working on negative cashflows, that is they are eating into their own home equity etc to pay the bills. This is something like twice the historical average. I’m sure it’s great comfort to those people to hear, ad nauseum, from Rudd, Swann, Gillard etc that they’ve been saved from financial disaster by labor.

      Maybe they saved Myer and Woolworths from a technical recession but on the coalface things are a lot worse than they appear from the boardroom (or should I say the reserve bank boardroom). Try being a small business and getting a loan from the bank (the same banks who used taxpayer guarantees to lower their LIBOR rates).

    • Dingo says:

      12:12pm | 21/06/10

      There may be 770,000 “registered companies” but how many are small businesses and how much profit are they making?

      A couple of the small businesses I do work for, have wages of around $450k, but only make a profit of about $15,000 pa. That means they’ll save around $300 in tax and have to pay an extra $13,500 in super guarantee payments, which will basically wipeout any profit.

      This government has no idea about business, big or small.

    • Sally says:

      02:21pm | 21/06/10

      @Nafe,
      Your comment has me stumped.  Who lets any tradie loose in their roof ( or anywhere in their house for that matter) without checking the work themselves?  Oh that’s right, the same sort of person who greedily grabbed a freebie rather than pay a decent price to a decent firm for a decent job.  Blame the govt for the bad job in your roof, but if you were unaware and living under said roof, I don’t see how the government was to know.  Go ahead and sue….....you like the idea of something for nothing obviously.

    • Bruce says:

      09:28am | 21/06/10

      Chris: Agree with much of your article. However, in regards to your small electrical company, maybe you should have tendered for profitable government contracts !!

    • Elizabeth says:

      10:17am | 21/06/10

      The problem with tendering for government contracts Bruce is that they are the worst payers of all.  Suppliers, staff and sub contractors still have to be paid on time though, usually by extending the overdraft or home mortgage buy the small business owner.

    • Dave Sag says:

      09:35am | 21/06/10

      While I don’t agree with everything you saybher, you do make an interesting point about the banks, they should be hit with a super profits tax, along the lines of the proposed Robin Hood tax in the UK. But alas it’s not that simple.

      The mining companies, as a general rule, dig up resources that, presumably belong to all of us.  Their profits tend to go offshore rather than back into local economies. And the stuff they mine can’t be readily moved offshore. These are not transportable businesses. So it’s both morally right, and easy to hit them with a super-profits tax.  It’s disingenuous to claim they are having their ROI capped at 6%. But banks can move around at the click of a button.  Money is the most mobile asset class there is. So a super tax on the profits of banks would send the banking industry offshore in the blink of an eye.  (Im also curious now as to whether a banking super profits tax is actualy LNP policy, of if you were just wishing aloud there.)

      Where the PM and his gang have let us down I feel is in being spineless.  We all understand that the government of the day will make some policies we do not agree with, but the extent of the backflips, the failures of plain courage, are what makes me wonder if I could ever vote for this lot.  I’ll be voting Greens, but I am stuffed if I know who to direct my preferences to.  Abbott is a dangerous loon imho and Rudd a spineless jerk.

      It will be interesting to see how the next few months unfurl as I’m sure I’m not the only one who thinks like this.

    • Peter says:

      10:08am | 21/06/10

      You’re protest vote to the greens is a senseless act .A vote for the greens is a vote for Labor and a vote for Rudd so nothing changes.I can’t work out your logic,please explain?

    • antman says:

      02:44pm | 21/06/10

      Peter, can you please explain how a vote for the Greens is a vote for Labor? Cleary you’ve seen something in the Electoral Act that is invisible to anyone who has bothered to read it.

      My reading of the Electoral Act is tha a vote for the Greens is, in fact, a vote for the Greens. If your Greens candidate is knocked out of the race, then your vote goes to whomever of the remaining candidates you have preferenced higher, not the Greens’ preferred candidate.

      It seems that the LNP is sinking to a new low by trying to mislead voters as to how our system of democracy works.

    • Peter says:

      03:26pm | 21/06/10

      Antman .It seems that it it is you who is trying to be misleading as most people choose their candidates from the how to vote cards and as you are well aware preferences from greens will go to Labor eight percent of the time.So if you are voting greens then its highly likely that your second preference won’t be a coalition member.Your comments expose you as another lackey from the left spruiking more spin and trickery from this deceitful Labor government.

    • antman says:

      04:22pm | 21/06/10

      Peter, far from it. I’m not affiliated to any political party. I’m just someone who hates seeing misrepresentation and dumbing down of important matters like our systems of governance (so i have issues with both major parties and most of the minors as well as politically affiliated spruikers on these sites).

      In any case, while your observations regarding the general voting patterns of Greens voters are generally correct, what you said in reply to Dave’s post was incorrect and completely misleading. Specifically, you told Dave that his vote for the Greens was a vote for Labor, which is completely false. It will depend on how Dave directs his own preferences as to who his vote actually ends up with. If he chooses to only vote “above the line” or follow a Greens How to Vote card, then it may end up going to Labor but, again, that is entirely his personal choice and not the automatic outcome of voting for the Greens. I suspect that there may be quite a few people voting Green in this election who direct their preferences against the ALP. I think that the preference flow from Greens to ALP will be significantly below 80% this election.

      Regardless of this, you are still wrong and trying to mislead. I still think that you are an LNP lackey deliberately trying to discourage people from voting Greens by lying.

    • Denis Quigly says:

      09:36am | 21/06/10

      I have a policy in life; ” never drink with or listen to lawn bowlers, golfers and small businessman, they will bore the pants off you”.  This columinist Chris Lehman confirms my point.

    • Lincoln Howes says:

      09:37am | 21/06/10

      Gosh, Chris. For a moment there, I thought we were headed for a fair shake of the sauce bottle. Unfortunately, as K. Rudd himself has amply demonstrated, a country mile of Grandad vernacular doesn’t automatically earn you “fair dinkum” points. And I know I’m a pedant, but does a “blue collar” flavour have to extent to grammar - three times in one sentence.
      “I have no doubt that a Howard or Costello government would of (sic) stimulated the economy during the downturn, but I bet my leftie it would of (sic) been smaller and programs like the BER (another bloody acronym) would of (sic) had more of a focus on local control over the money rather than a cookie cutter approach.

    • nosthow says:

      09:38am | 21/06/10

      What about all the good things the Rudd government has done Chris. He has given pensioners - all 3 million plus of them a better quality of living. During the GFC he instigated Bank Guarentees thus keeping Australias banking system safe. The Stimulus pakages were acknowledged by leaders of the Retail world to having saved them at a bad time and so it goes on. On the other side we have a very unknown candidate in Abbott. No real policies except things like “we will send all under 30’s unemployed over to WA to work in the mines etc ! What a drip - not PM material at all. Mr inconsistency is Mr Abbott. A failed Howard government minister no way out of his depth !

    • Nick says:

      10:12am | 21/06/10

      Not only is Rudd making Abbott look good but also Whitlam..

    • Mick says:

      09:39am | 21/06/10

      Holly.. the fact that you have used Four Corners as a defense for a Labor government nullifies every word you have typed.No point in reading any further.

    • Nicole says:

      10:28am | 21/06/10

      Now come on Mick. If Holly saw it on Four Corners and If Swan says so then it just must be correct. *Rolling Eyes*

    • Tony K says:

      09:52am | 21/06/10

      Perhaps we can get rid of all small business owners and have everything run by government. That would ensure we would get value for money ,just like the BER.

    • Micko says:

      10:07am | 21/06/10

      Chris

      Others besides small business owners have taken a hit recently.  If you consult the ABS Labour Data you will find that average weekly earning have actually gone up.  It is well known that the most low paid that take the biggest hits in an economic downturn.

      I’m sorry you are feeling the pinch mate, but the fact is as an electrical contractor you have one of the most marketable skills in the economy, you are probably better placed to weather the storm than anyone.  I still can’t get an electrician to walk in my door for less than $1,000….so don’t push the violins too hard buddy.

    • Dingo says:

      12:43pm | 21/06/10

      I don’t know where you live Micko, but one of the Electricians I do work, for operate in Mosman NSW (Sydney’s most expensive suburb) and they charge $95, not just to walk in the door, it also covers the first hour of labour as well.

    • Nicole says:

      12:57pm | 21/06/10

      Errrr, Micko, $1000k to walk in the door? You are full of it. My husband has been a sparky for 25 years, and I’m yet to have the pleasure of invoicing anyone a grand to just walk in the door. I think you might be telling a big porky here.
      And perhaps Electricians have marketable skills in the economy, but they also have one of the most dangerous jobs. Remember that.

    • Micko says:

      02:36pm | 21/06/10

      Err wrong Nicole according to the latest statistical bulletin from the Workcover Authority (http://www.workcover.nsw.gov.au/formspublications/publications/Pages/statisticalbulletin200708.aspx) it is unskilled labourer that suffer the highest rates of workplace injury and the worst industry to work in is manufacturing.

      BTW if we were to amalgamate all the claims on the Punch to having the most dangerous jobs then it would be a long list, including Police, fire fighters, construction workers, nurses, miners, etc etc….electricians would be well to the back.

      Funny we never hear anyone advocating for the unskilled labourer on these pages.

    • iansand says:

      10:11am | 21/06/10

      If the Liberals were in power Mr Lehman would be re-locating his failing business to the mines.

    • Carnegie says:

      10:19am | 21/06/10

      Great article Chris!
      You have captured my own thoughts perfectly! I also run a small business and the best word to describe the past 2 years has been “survival”. There is nothing left to cut but the staff, which I’ll move mountains to keep and in that atmosphere it is frustrating beyond words to have a government treating our taxes like it is confetti!!

    • Faz says:

      10:20am | 21/06/10

      @  Nath

      I work for a small firm too (aka the real world) and we’ve tried to get some building work done (not from the big guys) and 6 months ago the common response was, ‘don’t even talk to us until July’.

      @ Mick

      It may be that firms have had to make adjustments to keep workers on, but that’s better than the alternative.

      I think Chis’s ‘real world’ is defined by his politics rather than his work.

    • gil4d says:

      11:17am | 21/06/10

      some building contractors are flat out but i can tell you they are in the minority .i am a small business operator who supplies office supplies to other businesses and i can tell you from day to day dealings with customers things are very slow out there . the big spend o thon dudd and the gang went on didnt save us from anything it just pushed it back a couple of years .my sales for the last 6 months are the worst they have been in 7 years ! when the stock market crashed in 1989 the real kick in the pants didnt come until 1991 . i too am sick of hearing how labour saved us from the gfc they didnt its still coming mark my words

    • Matthew says:

      10:22am | 21/06/10

      I think the author (and a lot of people in these comments) have forgotten what a recession is like.

    • Bizniss says:

      01:40pm | 21/06/10

      Or why they occur and how frequently they occur and how they are a normal part of the business cycle….......

    • Alice says:

      10:25am | 21/06/10

      Chris makes sense. Chris for PM. Time for the politicians to come back to the real world - no more free flights, free lunches, expensive super packages, gas-guzzling cars. Take a trip back to reality and see how the rest of us are coping.

    • Andrew says:

      10:25am | 21/06/10

      As I read this post I found myself agreeing with almost everything that was written, then I say that the author was a LNP member and thought “here we go”.

      Mate don’t you know you’re not allowed to point out Labors faults if your on the conservative side of politics? Its negative and invites a 4 Step approach:

      STEP 1. Play the man not the ball (you’re not really blue collar enough, not a tradie, you’re a liberal party barking dog with no experience in theoretical economics which worked so well for marx and lenin - oh and don’t you dare call former members of the communist party socialists, in doing so you’re simply being alarmist.

      STEP 2. Ignore all of the facts you’ve pointed out (like the surplus Australia had at the start of the GFC and the fact Labor denied the existence of the GFC to begin with, and then once in power panicked the hell out of everyone)

      STEP 3. Rewrite history. A failure becomes an unmitigated success. Just get a few mates to do a report with a narrow terms of reference and say its 99% successful (here’s a question, you run a small business, 99 jobs you do right, number 100 an employee dies, are you off the hook because you get 99 per cent right - I don’t think so).

      STEP 4. Attack the opposition, particularly the leader. “He’s a right wing, religious nutter, wqho is dangerous for national security etc”. Apparently it’s ok for Labor to be alarmist.

      The funny thing about all of this is it doesn’t matter, the people who post here will not change their views of politics because of anything you write. And the left will not entertain the idea of criticising Rudd until the party has dumped him and then he will end up somewhere between Latham and Gough. WHat is really interesting is that Rudd was elected on a “change” platform . A Sunrise led pact of trust with the electorate. The trust is broken, you simply can’t get that back.

      How funny was the “you can’t blame that on me” line on 60 minutes last night. I thought Tara Brown was pissweak, why didn’t she say, “If you thought it was so important why didn’t you go to a double dissolution”. That’s a question I would have paid to see asked.

      Anyway, damn fine article, and all of the Labor people on here having a red hot go at it, bring on the election, I think you know you’re on the nose.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      11:00am | 21/06/10

      You don’t get it. We don’t like Liberal OR Labor. As for Chris, show me the books and then I’ll believe you…...

    • dovif says:

      12:09pm | 21/06/10

      Andrew

      Yes, I remember that 4 month after the first bank in America was struggling and the sharemarket started to fall. Swann was on TV saying, that the inflation genie was out of the bottle and the RBA was raising interest rate

      The facts are the ALP was clueless about what was going to happen with the GFC, and they were blindsided badly. That was why they were in panic mode, when it finally dawn on them that inflation was not the problem.

      Now they tries to paint themself as the savior of the economy, after throwing cash around like drunken sailors. Quite simply, if you throw around $100 billion, you can make some changes to the economy, provided the amount is not wasted and will increase future income of the country

    • Roja says:

      01:07pm | 21/06/10

      Ah Andrew, “STEP 1. Play the man not the ball ” is Abbott’s mantra - so if lefties on this forum use such a tactic then they are merely paying homage to your idol.  Even his budget reply was entirely play the man.  Besides all of these steps are the domain of both sides, to try and pin it on one is a childish argument.

      Of course when your rant continued you then used Stalin, the second biggest destroyer of one’s own argument behind referring to Hitler. 

      One thing that you got 100% right was that you wont change anyone’s mind on this forum.  Of course to change someone’s mind, you need to make a balanced argument that is close to their beliefs - not a 4 point dot brief attacking your opponents views without contributing to the actual debate in any way shape or form.

    • Holly says:

      10:38am | 21/06/10

      I think you would have approved of this one Mick.  You can still read the Hawke Report on their website so it pays to keep your mind open.  Four Corners totally ignored the report in their program although it had been released a few days earlier.

    • Dave says:

      11:17am | 21/06/10

      Just who is pinching the BER money? Just who rorted the home insulation scheme? ‘Struggling’ business like those run by the writer. Who stuffed the CPRS? Business.The writer is clearly a Howard acolyte. Mate if you reckon your doing it tough, go and talk to some cleaners or factory workers, then talk about the real world. It is clear from your comments regarding labour ‘fle xability’ you are just a bad, greedy boss hankering after WorkChoices.

    • Andrew says:

      12:16pm | 21/06/10

      Dave do you mind if I call you Mr CJ (that is Mr Conclusion Jumper from now on)?

      No one is questioning whether the home insulation scheme was rorted. The point is the plan was flawed, the roll out was flawed and the government had fair warning but did nothing about it.

      Secondly, how did business stuff up the CPRS? If anything, you can say the Libs (or indeed the Greens) stuffed it because they refused to vote for it. I’m not sure how you can blame business. And lets be frank, if Labor were that serious about it they would have either called a DD elecetion or made it a central plank of this coming election rather than putting it off until some later date. Everyone knows a CPRS/ETS with Australia going it alone would simple make us uncompetitive. No doubt a price for carbon is coming, but until the US, China, Europe, India and Russia agree, we would simple look stupid for doing something.

      Finally, no doubt some factory workers and cleaners might be doing it tough. And I’m sure we’d all like the lower paid in our soceity to do better. There are a number of ways to acheive this. Wages for low paid workers can be increased (this tends to have an immediate inflationary effect), secondly government can raise taxes and redistribute wealth via low paid workers social policies (labor like doing this but it tends to stifle investment and provides a disincentive to risk) or thirdly governments can attempt to encourage capital investment which provides an incentive to growth and therefore increase government revenue bases.

      You seem very keen to ensure you paint Chris as a greedy boss who hankers for workchoices (again could you please explain why apart from removing the no disadvantage test workchoices was bad?) but the truth is, if he was greedy he would have got rid of his apprentices rather than asking them to take leave which he undoubtedly has to pay for.

      Truth be told, if Chris is an electrician, he probably left school early, learned a trade, went out on his own risking his own capital (maybe with a mate), borrowed to expand, got trusted and made a few dollars and realised that encouraging people to achieve is the way to prosperity for all.

      As soon as I read this article I realised jokers like you would be out to crucify this guy without any evidence or sense of balance. No-one hates like the left.

    • Andy says:

      11:24am | 21/06/10

      I’m not quite sure what your argument is chris. It seem to be that if the conservatives were in power debt would be slightly less.
      As you know, the revenue raised by the RSPT will be used to cut company tax and for new infrastructure spending, not to fill the hole in the budget from the collapse in revenue receipts due to the economic downturn.
      Any small business owner knows you have to take the good times with the bad, painting yourself as some kind of hero because you have had to tighten your belt is a bit of an insult to the rest us.

    • Greg says:

      01:14pm | 21/06/10

      I think what Chris has reported on Andy is that life ain’t quite the bed of roses that Krudd and kronies would want you to believe it is as a result of their so called GFC management.
      As many have pointed out you can make for a lot of insulation installation, retail and building work jobs with a cash splash but what then?, and so for an interim stemming of unemployment the debt level soars and not a great scene for the second and third waves of crisis.

      What Krudd and Kronies along with you also miss is that the RSPT if it occurs will also be not just an interim solution but a permanent killer of the industry and so where then is the income and for what infrastructure spending! but you’ll be happy to leave a hole in the budget will you.
      As for sharing good times and bad, what about his broadband ploy making it cheaper but also having all telstra/cable broadband customers signed over to NBN for whatever the cost!!
      It’s past Time!

    • Andy says:

      02:05pm | 21/06/10

      Greg, I don’t think any body is saying the economy is going gangbusters, but it is performing well in the context of a global recession due to a few factors including stimulus. Are you suggesting we would be in a better position to fight a second wave if we had a recession with higher unemployment.

      Find me an economic NGO that believes the RSPT will lead to a reduction in mining output. We should be using the income generated from our natural endowments to build up the long term wealth of the nation and the broader economy.

      Labor, Telstra, Business and consumers all want the NBN, just not the conservatives. How can we expect to build a sophisticated economy with third rate communications.

    • Greg says:

      04:05pm | 21/06/10

      The economy is only performing better than others Andy not just because of the cash but because we had lower unemployment to start with, a budget surplus that Labor inherited and a booming resources sector fueled by Chinese demand even if their growth did slow after the Olympics.
      If a more measured stimulus had occurred, kick starting for instance what may help to alleviate future water shortages and flooding, a harnessing and channelling to the south of northern tropical flood waters, the potential longer term benefits of that would have been far more atronomical than a $900 blow job and new school libraries etc., whether needed or not.
      Yes, it takes time to get such projects to a scale for absorbing unemployment but it would be longer term and the debt level more controlled.
      Whether the Libs would have done so is another matter but I doubt that we would have had the kneejerk reaction that has occurred and the wastage and loss of life that has resulted.
      But there are limits to any country’s debt and you only have to look at what is happening in Europe to see the next step.

      Whatever an NGO believes or not, if they do not believe that mining is a competitive industry then they need to seek a new belief and Australia does not have a monopoly on mineral resources.
      Sure you cannot readily recoup all the infrastructure and plant capital but a lot of mines do get put into mothballs with equipment parked up and even sold off if the bottomline is no good.
      Most mines also start out on known reserves and it is not unknown for further exploration to reveal new reserves that may require new plant and the overall expansion cost will be compared to other potential projects.
      So yep, there may be minimal initial shutdown and thus no immediate reduction in overall output for all impact will not be of an overnight timetable, but it is the impact, 5, 10 and more years down the track that also needs to be considered.
      It would be great if wealth from mineral reources goes into nation building and potentially the most restrictive issue for Australia is ............,
      Yes, water and our farmers are not getting any younger either.
      Will another blow job on a national super broadband help that or Julia’s grand plan of 40% of Australians doing a University degree!

      However, whatever it goes on, it has to be available in the first place and if existing mines do not continue for the longest possible time, the wealth will be diminished.

      Telstra were just hanging out to get a reasonable price for use of their infrastructure and it seems somewhat a stroke of madness to have what is a former national entity pitted by the government against a new government created entity they’ll hope to also sell off, some very unusual structuring if ever there was.
      But then for Consumers! - have you found any who know what their NBN costs will be!, and then they may have second thoughts.

      And what makes you believe an economy will thrive just because of supposedly the latest and greatest in communication, not to mention possible obsolescence of any form of cable against future wireless transmission.
      Economies will thrive because of providing good essential infrastructure, population management, basic products produced and their transport whether national or international more so than just how fast you can access info ot transmitt it on the internet.

    • John A Neve says:

      11:45am | 21/06/10

      Chris,
      Has today, done what a number of people have done of late, highlight the fact that our taxation system is flawed.
      Rather than argue about what this or that government had done or not done, why don’t people address the real issue. The whole taxation system needs to be revamped.

    • Freeman says:

      12:28pm | 21/06/10

      No one has failed to address the issue of our flawed tax system more than kevin rudd himself. Henry proposed tax reform in his tax review and all that labor has done with it is propose this tax grab. what are your thoughts on that, John?
      this mining tax is just a massive tax grab with the mining industry being a soft target because of a public perception that miners are big bad nasty billionairs. the truth is that mining companies have achieved a level of efficiency that delivers them a big profit while also delivering rivers of gold to state goverments Via royalties and federal goverment via tax. not sayin that the industry can’t pay more tax but this tax grab should be seen for what it is. Ruddy would have us beleive that the miners aren’t paying their fair share for OUR minerals but if he gets his tax grab up then they would be.  it’s a simpleton argument.

      Hey John, I also think it’s funny that you claim to be a right winger on a previous post after all of the rubbish you’ve posted on topics such as assylum seekers.

    • Faz says:

      12:07pm | 21/06/10

      @  gil4d

      i too am sick of hearing how labour saved us from the gfc ...

      And I’m sick of hearing how it was the mining companies.

      It was a combination of factors. In the ‘real world’ it is foolish to deny the role of the stimulus package, of mining and of dumb luck. OK?

    • A Bob says:

      12:09pm | 21/06/10

      Interesting read from a man at the coal face. If I may clarify one thing, it would be the Costello ‘tsunami’. Here is Costello’s interview:

      http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/10/26/2071042.htm

      The tsunami referred to the reversals in FX flows if China adjusted its currency. At the end, it’s noted that “the US subprime crisis is sending ripples through the global economy”.

      China didn’t adjust its currency. The GFC resulted from those “ripples” becoming a huge wave. Costello did not predict it.

      But, a little revisionist history never hurts:

      http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/i-got-it-right-on-tsunami-costello/2008/09/24/1222217331273.html

      The quote:

      ““I thought the fallout from the subprime markets would send ripples, and that is why I described it as a tsunami, from the United States out throughout the world,” he said.”

      Somehow, “ripples” meant “tsunami” at the time.

      Costello was execellent treasurer. He passed good, solid budgets. My only complaint against him is that he didn’t stand up against Howards messing with them to pass more middle class welfare. I think he would have made a good, if somewhat uninspiring, PM and would have handled the GFC well.

      But, I don’t credit him the the prescience he and others claim.

    • Alfred Deakin says:

      12:10pm | 21/06/10

      Third world countries (such as Cameroon) generally have lower taxes, but this means they have poorer government services. Services such as eductaion, welfare, health care and of course air transport safety.

    • Andrew says:

      12:28pm | 21/06/10

      Phurphy argument there Alf. We all know that countries such as Cameroon have low tax taxes for the sole reason of encouraging risk and investment of foreign capital.

      Their economy and institutions are far less mature than ours and we are what they are seeking to become. If I was the minister for mines in Cameroon I’d be sending flowers to K Rudd thanking him for making Ceroon look more attractive to international capital.

      I suppose next you’ll compare us to PNG.

    • Holly says:

      12:22pm | 21/06/10

      Well I am still chortling to myself at the thought of being an alp/staffer or actu employee. Noting could be further from the truth but the salary would be nice.  Any person can go to the source i.e. the original documents Hansard, budget papers, Senate committee documents etc. (they are all online) and I am able to read beyond the headlines of an article.
      When the coalition actually starts to say something then maybe I will agree with that - who knows.  But I hope we wont be restricted to words of one syllable (Great Big New Tax) and policies like the parental leave scheme giving up to 75,000 dollars in welfare payments to high income earners.  I have no evidence presented in any source so far that Abbott and Hockey really have any understanding of the economic situation, or would be prepared to stand up for fairness in this country.  Like most low income earners I was totally dudded by the coalition when they were in power as the most I got for compensation for the GST was tax cuts worth a couple of cups of coffee while vast tax cuts went to those on high incomes and middle class welfare.
      Infrastructure was allowed to run down and I dont for one minute believe that there was no government wastage under Howard - look no further than the defence spending decisions.

    • Rebecca Glass says:

      12:33pm | 21/06/10

      Now Wilson Tuckey is virtually blaming the government for this plane crash in Africa!! Give me a bloody break, you streaching it way to far. Those men were in that country in that plane because they wanted to be. Those mining companies have irons in many many fires. I sincerly hope Santa does not get waylaid on the way to Aus or Kevin Rudd will be to blame for that too. Crying wolf to often will just make you unbeliveable.

    • cybacaT says:

      12:37pm | 21/06/10

      I too am sick of hearing about the GFC.  It’s very EASY when you have been given plenty of cash reserves to simply spend the money.  That’s all Rudd did - spend our money and label it “stimulus”.  The HARD work is generating and saving the money in the first place - something Howard did.

      The second thing that irritates me about the GFC is Labor claimed everyone opposed a stimulus package.  Rubbish!  I recall clearly that it was universally supported at the time - the only argument was that Labor’s stimulus package went way too far in amount. 

      As it turns out, Labor planned to spend so much on “stimulus” because it was the gravy train designed to take them to the next election.

    • Crash says:

      02:17pm | 22/06/10

      universally supported?
      So being completely blocked the first time and then a few independants having special deals made for them to only just get it through counts as universally supported? 
      By that logic Rudd would seem to be universally supported as PM right now

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      12:38pm | 21/06/10

      Those allegedly running the US Banks were revealed for being nothing more, nor less, than a bunch of shysters who had conned the rest of the Banking & Finance industry around, almost, all of the rest of the world. What passes for the Federal Government of Australia, under that ghastly, bad tempered, tantrum-throwing public servant Kevin Rudd, and his pals in the State Governments, told us that Australia was, thanks to our Banking & Finance Regulations to a very great extent protected from the fall-out in the US, UK & EU. As a precaution they introduced the Deposit Guarantee Programme in order to quell any possible panic by members of the public. It worked. There was no run on the banks. Unless kept secret by Rudd, the Deposit Guarantee was never required to be brought into play. Still in a blue funk Rudd, like a kid in a lolly shop, grabbed all the money the Howard Government had stored up & dished it out at $900 a throw, no controls, no conditions, no regualtions. What happened? Most people, instead of using it to Australia’s advantage virtually transferred it to the Chinese Communist Government’s banks. Rudd & his mobsters keep bragging about how he saved us from the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). How the hell can we be saved from something which, when it suits these liars, they repeatedly tell us has had, for all intents & purposes, absolutely no impact on Australia? Rudd & Swan just keep spending & spending & spending. They have squandered untold billions on failed, rorted and death-dealing programmes. They have dumped the “greatest mosral challenge of our times”.They have, thanks to SA Senator Penny Wong, Minister for Nothing, betrayed us over their climate change catastrophe. Water? What bloody water? Just like Wong, Rudd et al another abject policy failure. Rudd promised to cure what he grandiosely called “A cancer on Democracy”: Party political advertising by the Federal Government. He cited the amount spent by Howard over the GST. The jury is still out on whether or not that advertising campaign was party-political or a genuine attempt to inform the public as to how the GST would work. Rudd has taken that ‘Cancer on Democracy’ one step further for he has deliberately over-ridden his own rules. He has told us nothing in his $39 million party-political ad campaign promoting his Resources Super Profits Super Tax. Remember in addition to the 40% Super Profits Super Tax the miners will still be paying the normal tax of 30% - less legal deductions on their entire taxable income!
      I wonder if we would be happy & don’t think it is not possible, if Rudd decided that after we had all paid our Income tax any person or family whose joint annual income exceeded, say $150,000, would then have to pay an additional 40% on anything over that. A tax on a tax. That is what Rudd & Swan want to do to the entire mining industry. If they succeed then it will not be long before, at the behest of their Chinese masters, Rudd & Swan will extend those new taxes to every business & individual in the country.

    • Steve Putnam says:

      12:40pm | 21/06/10

      As a self-employed person I share your belief that our sector is the engine room of the economy, but that is where we part company. Do you really think that without the financial stimulus package we would be were we are today? Compare our unemployment rate (5%) with those of any other advanced economies, the healthy state of our financial sector where none of our major institutions collapsed, and the fact that our public sector debt is less than 20%, compared to the US, Britain, France or Japan where that figure starts at about 85%and climbs to well over 100%. Peak bodies from all the major sections of the economy including manufacturing and retail, transport and storage, construction,and accommodation have all acknowledged the success of the stimulus package despite initial skepticism.

      That Howard and Costello would have taken some action is undeniable, but it would have undoubtedly taken the form of middle class welfare. Compare their fatuous education spending with what Rudd and Swann have attempted. While I don’t deny there has been waste and rip-offs have occurred, we haven’t seen wealthy private schools being favoured over the public sector. How could anyone justify the public money that was spent on such things as indoor basketball courts, swimming pools and rifle ranges while public schools and universities were forced to fend for themselves?Oh and before you state that I am fighting some some class war or are playing the politics of envy, let me state that I educated my daughter at both private and public institutions according to how her needs and interests developed. I spent over $30,000 doing this, but I acknowledge that I was more fortunate than most who just aren’t in a financial position to do this.

      I found it strange at first, that you are opposed to the mining tax, but then I read at the bottom of your article that you are a Liberal Party member and so you oppose it on ideological grounds despite the tax relief that small business gets when it is implemented. All I can say is you can’t be hurting too much, and you can hardly claim that you’ve pulled your belt into the last notch.

      Lastly you take a swipe at Rudd over a broad range of issues including government advertising which you describe as a “cancer on democracy” and “stopping boat people”. Well Chris your people wrote the book on government advertising. The GST campaign cost the Australian tax-payer more than the Hawke/Keating government spent in its thirteen years on advertising and told us precisely nothing about it. Regarding boat people, the only way you will stop arrivals is by putting an end to persecution in those parts of the world from which people flee. Those Tampa asylum seekers that Howard leapt upon during the 2001 election campaign were almost to a person found to be genuine refugees, many of whom were quietly re-settled in Australia after the tumult and the shouting died. That they had witnessed unspeakable atrocities at the hands of the Taliban, seeing, amongst other things, family members being beheaded and tortured, mattered not a whit to Howard; there was political capital to be made out of it- end of story!

    • Greg says:

      01:42pm | 21/06/10

      You are really dragging up the dregs ain’t you Steve and so in your broadminded attitude do you think our unemployment scene is totally because of the Krudd cash splash or could starting from a lower unemployment base to start with have something to do with it?
      And then for what lesser unemployment may be due to cash, it comes with a cost and/or time restraints.

      And in having used private schools you would be well aware of what fee levels are and that per capita, less public money goes to private schools than to public schools and so do not private schools have a right to use their fees income for whatever it is that attracts their clients.

      Re the mining tax, perhaps Chris has enough foresight to see what the longer term outlook may be, something that is sadly lacking with Labor policy of lets have a humungus spend like there’s no tomorrow.
      Gillard’s laptops for instance, how long before they’re out of date, busted or whatever and what is the ongoing cost?
      Same with new school buildings whether needed or not.

      And as for stopping the boat people, there are something like 20 -40 million refugees about according to UN figures and that figure is probably just gradually increasing, that not being the cause of increased boat arrivals but just that those with the money would choose to queue jump and put their lives at risk at the same time.
      Have you considered just where the money may have come from, money that refugees in UN camps do not have and yes, many of those have witnessed and been involved in attrocities too.
      So it is not about not mattering a whit but whether you feel the process through UN channels should be supported or you encourage people to risk their lives with people smugglers.

      The disencouragement did involve offshore processing as is attempted now but the difference is Rudd has removed the TPR making it almost a guarantee that if you get to Ashmore Reef, you’ll have entry into Australia, moving ahead of all those waiting in refugee camps.
      Is that the Australian way?

    • Bec says:

      01:43pm | 21/06/10

      Tell me this then, if the stimulus was responsible for saving us from the GFC and keeping unemployment down, why is it identical measures which spent as much per capita in the US and Europe did not work for them. Was it because unlike Australia (which had a $20+ billion surplus after repaying $96b of labor debt from the previous labor government) they were all in deificit?

      Frankly, if you can not accept that stimulus spending was both scattergun and wastrel I can’t accept any of your arguments.

      As for writing the book on government advertising, so what. Does that mean we can all make promises to stop injustices and then go back on our word because it is convenient to do so? What a facile and ridiculous argument.

      It simply comes back to this, every time labor are shown up (and there is a lot of opportunity to do so) they either say one of three things, its not our fault (its that nasty opposition), they used to do it to or, my personal favorite “we’ve been learning on the job” (translation “we weren’t ready to govern but we think we’re getting the hang of it now”).

      Absolute farce.

    • Evan Findlay says:

      02:27pm | 21/06/10

      Bec,

      Your comments are absolutely ridiculous and clearly demonstrate your lack of understanding, not only of economics, but also the precursors to America’s downfall and the European downfall. Most European countries as well as America did not have a surplus to begin with and that is where your argument ends.

      America’s downfall was initiated back when Greenspan and Clinton fully deregulated the banking and financial industry. The results were no different to when Hawke and Keating did it here in the late eighties. banks started lending money cheaply and to anyone who had a surname. Coupled with an over inflated property market, dodgy insurance companies upgrading bad debt to be sold off as deriatives and all it took was one small spanner.

      A lot of these deriatives and hedge funds made there way across the globe, some even made it here. The banks and financial advisors were acutely aware that these “bundles of debt” were toxic, but greed got the better of them.

      The other point is that some of these European countries have not implemented tax or labour reforms and are some thirty years behind most advanced economies. Greece for example has failed to tighten up it’s tax system allowing tens of billions of dollars in revevue to slip through the governments hands. The pension age in Greece is 54.

      And perception will determine consumer confidence. America was well on it’s way to recession long before stimulus measures were set up. When it comes to introducing stimulus measures to avoid recession you need to act quickly. There is no point injecting stimulus once in recession because people will keep the money because they are concerned about their job security, their mortgage, bills and family. Mention recession and wallets slam shut.

      So your comments are shallow and lack any understanding about economics or the facts with regards to America’s recession and Europe’s recession. Both are in recession but not entirely for the same reasons.

    • Bec says:

      04:02pm | 21/06/10

      With respect Evan, I think what you have to say is incorrect. I agree Clinton’s actions in ensuring money could be lent to people with no hope of paying it back unless their property value appreciated at a greater rate than their capitalised interest on their mortgage was a failure. But isn’t the Clinton/Greenspan : Hawke/Keating comparison a little out there.

      If what they did was the same why is it interest rates in the US remained lower (and were then lowered)? If memory serve me correctly interest rates under Keating got up to 20% I don’t remember US rates above 4.5%.

      I think, and I’m happy for you to disagree with me (politely), that economies that were living well beyond their means copped it and those that weren’t didn’t. As for the Greek economy, granted they have some credibility issues, so lets take Britian. After a decade plus of new labour how were they going economical? I appreciate your comments, I am merely of the opinion that the economic circumstances Messrs Rudd, Swan and co found themselves in at the commencement of the GFC were light years better than most other developed countries.

      I then noted most countries engaged in stimulus spending which appeared to work in Australia and…..?

      So either Rudd and Swan had a stimulus secret which they rudely refused to let everyone else in on or the stimulus could have a positive effect because of our pre-existing economic circumstances or it had little if any effect. I’m going for the latter but you’re entitled to your opinion.

    • Evan Findlay says:

      05:49pm | 21/06/10

      Bec,

      Australia was in a much better position going into the GFC, although we could have been a lot better had Howard and Costello not wasted Hundreds of Billions on unsustainable middle class welfare, but I digress.

      I raised the point about perceptions and there reciprocal influence on consumer, and subsequently, business confidence. Our government did not have to bail out banks as was the case in America. Whilst I am on that point, when Keating deregulated the banking and financial markets in Australia, the banking industry were falling over themselves to lend money to anyone who asked, remember Skase and Bond. The thinking of the banking industry at the time was that if they didn’t lend the money, the customer would simply walk down the road to the next bank and they would. So they simply lent the money so that their competitors wouldn’t get the business. That’s when Keating stepped in and re-regulated, because the banks were too greedy and unreliable and through their recklessness could bring down the entire economy. Sound familiar? The policy he brought in was known as the four pillar policy.

      But back to my point, with the American banking and financial industry crumbling with massive debts and relying on the government to bail them out ( so much for the free market ), with massive job losses and foreclosures, do you not see why the American people would stop spending? And when the consumer stops spending, every level of the economy goes to the wall. It feeds off itself. The less money within the economy, the more businesses fail and the more unemployment rises. Also the Rudd government was quicker to act and was more decisive in where the money went than their American counterparts. And yes there where some stuff ups but I much prefer those stuff ups than the taxpayer funding 8% unemployment. A major reason why we fared better was simply due to perceptions. The government acted decisively and with haste, we had money in the bank, the economy was in good shape and the government helped to protect our banking and financial institutions. Money was given to keep the economy ticking over thus supporting businesses, thus keeping people employed.

      And before you mention the home insulation, I personally think that people should have been a lot more rigorous in who they employed to do work on their house. But that’s the problem with society these days, it’s never their fault!

      And p.s. It was 17% under Keating. Isn’t it funny, it was cheaper to pay off a house at 17% back then than it is to pay off a house now at 7.5%

    • Mayday says:

      12:54pm | 21/06/10

      Thanks Chris for a well written argument, one important point you didn’t allude to is the lack of confidence in this government which not only affects the stock market but really affects consumer spending.
      Small business’s like Chris’s need domestic demand to rise and other business’s to expand to keep ahead of inflation, hire more people and provide the owner with a return on his/her investment.
      If confidence is lacking or shaken (eg the announcement of the RSPT) then
      consumers and business hold off spending and wait before they commit themselves to any unforseen risks and this trickles all the way through the economy. 
      Small business is the engine room of the economy and at the moment it is running in neutral and the lag will continue while confidence is low. 
      Over promising then under delivering, the sooner the election is called the better.

    • Saskia says:

      12:58pm | 21/06/10

      If Kevin Rudd was the manager of a business he would have been sacked.  Fact.

    • Andrew says:

      01:47pm | 21/06/10

      Actually he, swann, gillard, tanner and garrett would be facing civil and criminal charges ranging from false and misleading conduct to death resulting from failing to provide safe work conditions (and before anyone calls that into question just look at the relevant act, the most senior executive in the jurisdiction for a company is to be held liable)

    • Roja says:

      05:54pm | 21/06/10

      Saskia, not if he also owned the business.  Or the business was telstra.  So no, not fact.

      Andrew, you mean like Sol Trujillo faced civil and criminal charges for false and misleading conduct?  I don’t think so.  CEO’s of big business have rarely if ever been held accountable for pretty much anything.  Is the manager of BP going to personally sued for that little spill in the gulf of Mexico.  As for the ‘failing to provide safe work conditions’ that is such a stretch you probably need to go see a chiro.

    • glorfindel says:

      01:08pm | 21/06/10

      Funny I have a few mates in the construction industry, chippies, plasters, glaziers that kind of thing. All of them work for small businesses or are self employed sole traders and for the last 6 months or so the only work any of them has been getting is on school projects. As one mate put it 18 months ago he wouldn’t have looked at government work, right now that’s all he gets.
      Maybe Chris needed to look at his processes for finding work?

      Even if the BER money was only going to the big guys what would happen if the money wasn’t there? The big guys would be squeezing the little guys out of the market chasing whatever business was left.

      And I’d rather my tax money went on building school halls than paying for out of work tradies at centrelink.

    • Andrew says:

      02:16pm | 21/06/10

      No-one is begrudging school halls. What we, as the people who are paying for it are saying is the subbies could still be employed and get a heap of work (twice as much) if the government organised full value for this program. Why are non-govt schools getting so much more bang for their buck? Simply because they are running the project.

      Your comments here are disingenuine. I would appluad the BER if it got value for money or if we actually got $16b of value, but we are likely to end up with between $8 - 11b of value and that is due to government failure and ineptitude. I resent that and Labor voters who tend to be very critical of big business ought to resent it far more. Instead you are merely trying to win the argument. As always, doing what’s best for labor not for Australia.

      And the BER aside what about the myriad of other failures this government has been the cause of? Truly if you are honest with yourself you must admit that this government has promised so much and delivered so little. Such a shame, such a waste!

    • Big Jay says:

      02:19pm | 21/06/10

      Actually, I would prefer to have some of them on the dole queue at Centrelink.

      As others have said, if you want a tradie to do some work on your house you can’t get them or they charge more than $1000 a day. The cost of building a house has not gone down because tradie’s can keep their rates up as high as before the GFC. The $15bil price tag on the North-West Sydney rail line still applies, if there were queues of unemployed tradies that price tag would be much lower, and such projects might be feasible.

      No other industry has had their jobs protected to this degree and in many areas quite the opposite has happened such as hospitality (increased liquor regulations), accounting and IT (still high “skilled” migration intake).

    • Kath H says:

      01:49pm | 21/06/10

      Thanks Chris, enjoyed your article - and thanks for the comment about paying staff wages from home loan re-draw…..I thought we were the only ‘soft hearted’ fools to have done that!

    • Ryan says:

      01:52pm | 21/06/10

      @Steve Putnam: didn’t Rudd say he was going to put a stop to the so-called “blame game” didn’t he also say “the buck stops with me” therefore regardless of whatever the previous governments did, the buck stops with Rudd and his ridiculous lies about government advertising.

    • Patricia says:

      02:19pm | 21/06/10

      Obviously the opinions expressed here are leaning towards whichever party the writers support. i am an employer in the building industry on the Gold Coast. we will be retiring in February (although we were going to continue to work for 2 more years)  As soon as labor was elected the BLF union was on our doorstep demanding we sign a new EBA even though we had approached them previously and needed one for a contract. We drew up our own with our employees which perfectly matched the union one, without the need to be audited every 12 months or allow the union to sit in on business decisions. I went through years of having these thugs ( most of whom are completely without any commonsense) order us around , demand we book and pay hotel bills at indy and make our lives miserable. We refused to sign a union EBA and the union then went to every builder we were tendering with and threatened them if we won the contracts. We have put off 35 men and the rest will go in February . Why? because I cant stand anymore of this bullshit where idiots who haven’t put in the hard yards have such power over employers. I do believe in unions and we have always supported them with donations etc.They are a necessity but power corrupts and they have too much
      Whatever happens at the next election I hope that people really look at who they are voting for. I wont bag any politicans as I have no personal knowledge of them but I do believe Labor has stuffed Australia once again.

    • Andrew says:

      03:00pm | 21/06/10

      Problem here Patricia is if you made this complaint public Labor would spin it into class warfare and paint you as a bad employee or claim the BLF rep was just one bad apple. Sad for Australia, sad for those who want to have a go. Absolutely appalling.

      By the way try tendering for government work or getting a government grant without union labor.

    • glorfindel says:

      02:42pm | 21/06/10

      Hi Andrew,

      We have the healthiest economy in the developed world today by a country mile.

      Is that the “little” that the government delivered ?

      And wasn’t that the whole point of the BER and the stimulus measures to cushion the Australian economy? Shouldn’t that be the yard-stick by which they are measured ?

      Sure they had some failures like the ETS (voted down in the senate), Fuel watch (voted down in the senate), Grocery watch (a stuff up) etc.

      On the other hand I notice that Telstra has signed up to the NBN (at least in principle) the My Schools web-site is up and running, we have agreement on a national curriculum, national agreements on IR and a forward plan for health.

      As opposed to ?

    • Andrew says:

      03:45pm | 21/06/10

      You are only fooling yourself. The spin is strong in this one. May the spin be with you.

      I read a comment on another post and it definitely rings true with your comments “you’re whislting past the graveyard.”

      Ask not for whom the bell tolls…...

    • Hexy says:

      03:24pm | 21/06/10

      The Labor government is like a ‘made in china’ product. It looks like the real thing, cheap and accessable. However in a few weeks it breaks down and the warrenty is worth sh*t! Labor always comes across as a cheap useless imitation of the real thing (a competent government).
      Kudos for KRudd for screwing up it the classic Labor spend till the country goes broke style. We never expected anything less from our fearless leader.

    • DT says:

      03:30pm | 21/06/10

      I am a retired business person Chris, congratulations on a very well considered commentary, you are so right.

    • contrarian says:

      03:55pm | 21/06/10

      Aw, poor little Chris, living a country with a strong economy and near full employment (while the rest of the world falls apart). And he STILL can’t make ends meet! Here’s a tip - if you can’t run your business profitably in the current economy, yet claim to believe in the “free market”, stop whining about the Government and go get a real job. It’s called competition, silly.

    • At least we're not the US... right?? says:

      08:15pm | 21/06/10

      This comment scares me…

    • contrarian says:

      12:08am | 22/06/10

      Well I’m glad my comment scared you as it was meant to illustrate the hypocrisy of a member of the Liberal/National party complaining as if it is the governments fault their business is failing. Tony Abbot wants to force unemployed young people to work down the mines, remember? If Chris fails as an electrician then it is not the governments fault. The Australian economy is healthy, there are plenty of other jobs available. Why doesn’t Chris wind up his failing electrical business and go work down the mines? This would be more consistent with the policies of the party he supports rather than spending his time writing hypocritical propoganda on blogging sites. No one owes you a living - that is the policy of the Liberal/National party.

    • John H says:

      08:11am | 22/06/10

      Wow what a classy statement - I happen to know Chris personally and I know how he works - honestly and ethically . Perhaps that is why his business is quiet at the moment because he hasn’t jumped on the gravy train of ripping off his customers. He has the courage to put his name and his face up front as well as nail his beliefs to the mast. where’s your name and face hidden behind a pseudonym!

    • Julia says:

      03:57pm | 21/06/10

      This is great. I applaud this contribution. Thank you for writing it.

    • John Jordan says:

      04:18pm | 21/06/10

      Chris you are totaly spot on Its time for a change bring on the election before this bloke bankrupts the country.

    • Worker from down the street says:

      04:28pm | 21/06/10

      Regardless of personal political affiliations the way it is on ‘main st’ is the way it is. And no it isn’t all the ‘peaches & cream’ spin that some are preaching.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wf3KovsW1Zo

      Might be Lib ad but still funny as well as telling. 1/2 a cent for every view & retire to Penrith…NOT

    • Little Red Hen says:

      05:18pm | 21/06/10

      The little Red Hen was in the outback farmyard scratching for food, when she found a grain of ore.
       
      “Who will look for more of this ore?” she said.
       
      “Not I,” said the Goose. “My back’s a bit dodgy.”
       
      “Not I,” said the Duck. “Too risky. Too hot. I’m off to the pub.”
       
      “I will, then,” said the little Red Hen, and she searched and searched and searched until she found more ore.
       
      When enough ore was found she said, “Who will lend or invest money with me in order to buy equipment and hire the people I need to dig up this ore and process it?”
       
      “Not I,” said the Goose.  “I might lose my money.”
       
      “Not I,” said the Duck.  “I’m buying a bigger ute to tow my new boat.”

      “I will, then,” said the little Red Hen, and she spent her own money as well as all the borrowed and invested money to buy the equipment and hire the workers needed to dig up and process the ore.
       
      After she dug up and processed the ore she said, “Who will find customers, then build the railways and ports needed to deliver the ore to them?”
       
      “Not I,” said the Goose.  “I’m going to the footy game today.”
       
      “Not I,” said the Duck.  “I’m on a RDO.”
       
      “I will, then,” said the little Red Hen.
       
      When the ore was found, dug up, processed and delivered to the customers, she said, “Who will take a big share of the profit made from the ore?”
       
      “I will,” said the Goose.
       
      “I will,” said the Duck.
       
      “No, you won’t,” said the little Red Hen.  “I will give you some of it because you happen to live in the same farmyard I found the ore - but I will keep most of the profit for myself and those who invested in the equipment and wages I needed to turn the ore into something valuable.”

      “PROFITEER!” hissed the Goose.  “EXPLOITER!”  squawked the Duck.

      “Oh yes you WILL share a big part of the profit” sneered Righteous Swan.  “It’s only fair,” pontificated Farmer Rudd, “the ore belongs to everyone who happens to live in this farmyard so Righteous Swan and I will take 40% of your profits and share it with our friends so they vote for us again.”

      “Very well” said the little Red Hen - although the next time she saw a grain of ore she ignored it and concentrated instead on strengthening her wings so she could fly to another farmyard somewhere else.

    • Albatross says:

      05:38pm | 21/06/10

      Apparently the Red Hen failed to factor in the massive tax breaks and infrastructure investment provided by the Goose and the Swan. These tax breaks enabled it to dig up its ore and gain the investment that makes its enterprises profitable. Oh, and when it goes looking for farmyards to exploit in poor and downtrodden countries like the Congo, it might be wise not to use dodgy charter plane services…

    • Roja says:

      06:16pm | 21/06/10

      What a lovely contribution to the national curriculum this would make. 

      I think we should clarify a few things before we do, so we don’t confuse the kiddies:

      Are the Goose and the Duck two dole bludgers that Father Abbott wants to now send to work down the mines?  If so, how did one afford the boat?  Or are they employed in another industry that is now going to pay less tax which should take some of the heat out of the two speed economy this commie red hen created?

      Is Clive Palmer the red hen?  Actually he couldn’t be, he has never actually built a mine, rather just bought up land and flogged it off at incredibly marked up prices.  Perhaps the red hen was American and paid to come here and manage the process of hiring the cattle down the road to do all the actual work and the send the majority of profits offshore. 

      As for the hen flying to another country, well I would recommend Afghanistan - it’s one of the few countries where the mineral deposits haven’t already been purchased by an international mining interest.  Mind you the hen will then have to build the railways again to get it out to move it to China while avoiding IED’s and ambushes.

      Quite frankly if my poultry started digging up my farm and flogging it off to China without my consent I know what the roast meal would be on Sunday…. it’s probably why the Duck and the Goose didn’t get involved.

    • AJ says:

      10:19pm | 21/06/10

      Great story, don’t worry about Albatross and Roja, their politics is about envy. Their idea to fix a 2 speed economy is to wind back the success. Typical labor, champions of the mediocre.

    • Roja says:

      02:05pm | 23/06/10

      So AJ do you mean that selling off everything now for significantly less value is more prudent than holding on to non renewable assets that will only appreciate in value?  Even while doing so makes life more difficult for the 98% of the population that doesn’t have a direct income from it.

      Not that I’m labour of course, I’m actually a democrat (one of their 3 remaning supporters), however I would make the assertion that liberals will sell off everything to make their ‘economic credentials’ look good.  I can only guess that you think the way telstra was sold off was well managed. 

      I certainly don’t believe in mediocre, I believe in balanced well thought out development.  Sure that’s a conservative line of thought, which is odd that it is nothing to do with liberal party politics.

    • Sam says:

      05:32pm | 21/06/10

      To be upfront I am not a member of any political party but I am a member of a union. I was not surprised to get to the end of your article and find that you are a member of the LNP.
      If as you claim your business is struggling to make ends meet then surly you would benefit from the cut in tax rates for small business that will be funded by the RSPT?
      I thought the tax kicked in for profits above 6%, your article seems to suggest this means that resource companies are only achieving a 6% profit margin. This is clearly not the case, my understanding it that 6% is the yield from a government bond and is a reasonable measure for expected return from investment (with the rate of return increasing as risks increase).
      You make no mention of the rebate for failed mining projects. 
      You skim over the fundamental difference between banks and mining companies. Banks are not making a profit from non-renewable resources that are owned by all Australians. Once it has all been pulled from the ground surly we would be stupid as a country if we did not have something tangible to show for it but instead let the profits drift off shore. 
      I’m not sure where you get the impression that the mining industry was responsible for saving us from recession, if all industries had behaved in the same was as the mining industry unemployment would have been 19%.
      Apart from your clear hatred of acronyms and devotion to the LNP I cant see reason behind your article, it certainly adds nothing to the debate.

    • Mik Blyth says:

      06:45pm | 21/06/10

      As a small business owner, I am not asking for handouts, just the bloody 11,000 dollars of GST payments thats been owed to me since march. this would help a lot.

    • Steve Putnam says:

      07:19pm | 21/06/10

      Greg, it got to the point that more public money was given to private schools than to our universities with the result that at one stage, we didn’t have a uni in the top 100. This is OK with you?
      Mining was by far the most profitable sector of the economy (by more than three times the rate for all industry) for the financial year 08/09, yet it paid tax at a rate less than half that of personal income tax. You like being ripped off in this way?
      You call asylum seekers queue jumpers, tell me where the queue starts in Kabul. What would you do wait patiently while your family was in danger of being killed by a pack of Taliban sadists? My point is that Howard used this to the full. He demonised a lot of frightened helpless people purely to get re-elected, you can’t say otherwise.
      Is that the Australian way?

    • Coxy says:

      07:21pm | 21/06/10

      I can’t believe all the comments here more or less saying that this article is fake because a true straight talking working class bloke couldn’t possibly be a Liberal party voter let alone member.

      Well I am a small business owner who drops the odd swear word, wears flannelette shirts, goes shooting on weekends, drinks VB, and votes Liberal, as are a lot of my similarly bogan mates. Not only does Labor not have a monopoly on hard working average Aussies, they in my view no longer represent them. With the odd exception of blokes such as Bill Shorten, the Labor Party is now made up of Socialist Toffs (See exhibit A,our PM) that are more about inner city lefties than the working man.

    • gg says:

      01:44am | 22/06/10

      I agree coxy,

      A plain speaking no-spin piece.
      Must be all the Labor supporters can no longer recognize what no-spin actually looks like anymore after three years of evasive say nothing Rudd speak.

      Labor socialism is completely toxic to the prosperity of this country and they must not be reelected. The ETS tax on everything and based on fraudulent science plus internet censorship is enough for me. Not even to mention the countless rorts, massive immigration and reckless rush rush spending ...

    • CJ says:

      07:36pm | 21/06/10

      All good and well, but did you vote for him? Really, has he changed his tune since the election that much?  Wonderful to say, ““but I know what bullshit is”, just remember it the next time you all get the idea stuck in your noggins that “its time for a change, let someone else have a go for a bit”. Its a country, not a freakin cricket set.

    • Ian Holthouse says:

      02:04am | 22/06/10

      Well written. Who were the fools who voted for him. Rudd would have to be the most incompetant PM, this country has ever had. He certainly has caused the most damage, and Australia is going to take decades to recover. Where did Rudd’s $59 million come from, it is time every cent was accounted for.

    • Timmo says:

      07:44am | 22/06/10

      Look people, business is like this. Sometimes a feast, and sometimes a famine. That’s what it is isn’t it?. The writer of the article tends to Generalise a bit there, presuming that everyone who got the 900dollar stimulus wasted it on a plasma TV, but not him. Didn’t Kevvy give you a pressy mate, poor thing. What did you spent your stimulus and increased family allowance on matey?

      . It doesn’t matter what government is in, in business it’s about consumerism. Maybe people don’t want to spend their money at the moment, after all they are the ones who ultimately control the market place. Maybe you have a bad name and people don’t like you, so they don’t support your business anymore.

      If you have apprentices, then you get the benefit of not having to find full wages for a number of years and then the apprentice will stay on as part of the agreement to serve you for another 2 years thereafter. So, that saves a lot of money for the Employer, but on the other side it produces tradesman, hopefully well trained, and then guess what?, they will usually go into business as well and take away part of your business by doing so.

      Well, I have had a lot to do with the Electical game and my experience in the trade was not good. One of my bosses had a similar amount of employees and he was a very rich man. I presume therefore that you would have personal wealth just like he did. He treated his workers like pigs, talk about intimidation in the workplace, it was rampant in the 80s and I would presume it is the same now.

      Large construction jobs, compulsory ETU membership and victimization there, all in all a stinking low life part of industry. So I hope that you are not like that with your workers Chris, because if you are then you deserve to go broke. I don’t presume that you are because I don’t know you, so it would be unfair to think or write that way. So don’t be offended. It’s not meant that way to you from me.

      I hope you are able to resolve your issues and don’t go kicking anyone with your size 11 boots. Not a nice look. Anyway, why do you align yourself with the NLP. What a waste of time. With all you knowledge there you could have aligned yourself with people who would one day win, not be the constant losers. Maybe I think you backed the wrong horse. You had better change your bet. I hope that you are a nice boss and your workers are happy with you, It is upsetting when things don’t go as well as planned but hey Chris, that’s life. We’ve all got to wear it. Good luck!.

    • Frank says:

      12:55pm | 22/06/10

      Chris says:“If your super fund was only making 6% on your investment you would be looking to shift your money to a fund or investment that was doing better.”
      He completely ignores the 60% of profits above 6% that the miners get to keep.

    • Peasant #3167 says:

      01:53pm | 22/06/10

      Most politicians have no idea of the contemporary real World. Rudd and co, even his wife Therese. Her business became wealthy after wining contracts from the Labor Government and then the Howard Government. It became so successful from Taxpayers that even Wayne Goss got on board with a few other public servants.  Ohh how nice to have friends who hold the public purse.

    • Roberta Watts says:

      05:42pm | 23/06/10

      Please define “contemporary real world”?

    • val majkus says:

      08:57pm | 22/06/10

      hI Chris love your postcard; I notice there are a few posts referring to ‘our ownership of non renewable resources’; this is what the miners pay royalties for and they take the risk and do the work; here’s a copy of a post I made on another blog recently about this topic
      This Govt is weird; I don’t remember any other Federal Govt promoting a ‘them and us’ campaign like this Govt is doing; the perception the Govt is promoting is ‘us Aussies who own the resources are not getting a fair share and we need a fair share to boost your super and to generally make you feel warm and cuddled’ against ‘them nasty fat cat miners who are depleting natural resources and aren’t paying nearly enough tax.’ To boost this perception the Govt wants to spend $38 M on advertising because the miners are misinforming the public and their advertising warchest is $100 M; well we heard from the Minerals Council tonight on the news that their warchest is much less than the Govt’s. From all the ridiculous things that Ken Henry has been saying lately – the tax won’t harm investment in Aust and won’t affect prices and profits (check out http://catallaxyfiles.com/2010/05/27/maybe-ken-henry-misspoke/ ) Parts 1 and 2 and Wayne Swan and Rudd misrepresenting the tax that the miners have been paying I would say that all the misinformation is coming from Canberra not the miners
      Although the Govt are trying to tie the necessity for the RSPT into ‘the best interest of all Australians’ it’s really a tax grab by the Govt to make its future budget bottom line look better after its wasteful spending in this current term; the Govt have written the hoped for proceeds into recurrent expenditure; just think we are paying about $100 M per day of borrowed money just to pay the interest on what we have already borrowed (totalling about $140 B to date and we’re still borrowing) and it will take many many years and many many surplusses before we can pay off the debt
      The sad state of Australian Govt at the moment; and it’s going to cost about $16 M to fix the insulation fiasco

    • Pedro says:

      09:51pm | 23/06/10

      This guy needs help.
      My business is going gangbusters. I am looking for new employees now. My business is in the Automotive Electronics field so owe nothing to the GFC spend.
      This author is obviously not competent to run his own business. If he needs a job that reflects his abilities we need a cleaner and pick up guy which would suit him for sure.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

Does half the population really want to close the borders?? http://t.co/cNmpV2qH

Paul Colgan

In which Schapelle Corby is Photoshopped as Joan of Arc http://t.co/08UWH6yq

Paul Colgan

@karalee_ yeah, have concluded same after cursory look at a few. Scary that some brands might actually use them

David Penberthy

@Tony_Burke unlike wyatt it wasn't my 18th

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Schapelle has done her time

Schapelle has done her time

Schapelle Corby has served more than seven years in Kerobokan prison for attempting to import 4.2 kilos…

Do women need to know when to walk away?

Do women need to know when to walk away?

Opposition Leader Isobel Redmond has sparked controversy over her advice that young women should sometimes…

Who murdered the Arts degree?

Who murdered the Arts degree?

Have we murdered the liberal arts education? That was the final question on Monday night’s Q&A…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter