Recently my husband and I went whitewater rafting. No lazy river for us, we love those rapids that dump you into icy water or spin you into rocks.

Cotton wool THIS! Picture: Herald Sun

After a particularly perilous stretch, our guide mentioned that a woman had drowned after becoming trapped underwater between a rock and the raft. “Drowned, as in died?” I asked incredulously.

We always sign disclaimers but – rather stupidly, in hindsight – I’d forgotten these occasional adventures could actually kill us.

We talk about cotton-wooling kids, but does parenting also mean cotton-wooling ourselves?

Over the past decade, I’ve learnt to live with the sealing of my adrenalin synapses, because risk and child-rearing seem mutually exclusive. You can’t teach your kids to tie their shoelaces if you’ve lost your fingers to hypothermia.

Now I live safely. My husband, less so. After 12 years as a war photographer, he’s packed away his flak jacket, but I still see the light in his eyes when he’s dispatched to tsunamis, bombings and bushfires.

Meanwhile, I’ve given up the extreme skiing that required avalanche training. And while I once travelled through Africa’s machete country to find the oldest woman in the world, now I’d think twice.

Do I miss it? Oh, so much. But no rush, whether physically or chemically induced, is worth leaving my children without a mother.

So what of other parents who risk and sometimes lose their lives in their pursuit of danger and adventure? And what of those who do it for a career? The soldiers, police officers, firefighters who set off each day with the possibility they might not come home? Who’s a hero and who’s just plain foolhardy?

In 1995 I reported on the death of mountaineer Alison Hargreaves as she descended K2. Living her life according to the Tibetan proverb, “It is better to have lived one day as a tiger than a thousand years as
a sheep”, seemed achingly selfish against the image of her young son and daughter.

But her husband argued that everyone has the right to live their own lives and, “That’s who she was.”

The wife of kayaker Andrew McAuley used the exact same words as we sat in her Blue Mountains home after her husband perished crossing the Tasman Sea.

As their son played outside, Vicki’s face became a waterfall of pain as she sought to reconcile the loss of the man she loved with his craving for adventure.

Driving home afterwards, I also sobbed, and shouted, “You stupid man. That beautiful boy of yours will one day look out across the Tasman and wonder how that grey expanse of water could be so much more special than him.”

Years on, I’ve softened, because life – wherever or however you lead it – isn’t fail-safe. Weather, circumstances and luck can turn you from a Sir Edmund Hillary into an Alison Hargreaves.

As my friend and Wild Women on Top founder Di Westaway says, “You don’t conquer mountains; that’s a ludicrous notion. If the planets align, you may have the privilege of standing on the summit of an amazing mountain.”

Having descended Everest herself after developing a pulmonary oedema, the mum-of-three reckons it takes more courage to turn back than it does to keep going.

Just as genetics and happenstance can deliver cancer or depression, they can bestow a yearning for danger.

“No adventure is worth dying for,” McAuley wrote to a friend shortly before his death. “Life is more precious than any of these things. The paradox is some of us need to put it at risk to appreciate it.”

Most commented

35 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • acotrel says:

      06:14am | 23/10/11

      I’ve started an MA affiliated motorcycle club at Winton near Benalla.  We have kids as young as eight riding motocross bikes on our circuit, which took about 5 years to build.  Our next move will be to build club house facilities adjacent to the MX circuit, and incorporate a Mechanics’ Institute/ Mens’ Shed element, to draw in the old men of or area into a focussed activity. The new building will include a kiosk, toilets and a theatre/meeting area.

    • Kipling says:

      10:28am | 23/10/11

      Watch out mate, those kiosks, toilets and Theatres are high risk activity areas…

      grin

    • kevin Fudd says:

      02:27pm | 24/10/11

      Cool story bro. Tell some one who cares

    • Daemon says:

      08:10pm | 24/10/11

      Well done Kevin. at least those of us with IQ’s higher than our boot sizes understood the importance of talking about it.

      By the way, what is someone of your type doing in here. Would have thought the words would be a bit of a struggle for you.

      @Acotrel, sometimes university members of the young liberals give me the shits.

    • Cynicised says:

      10:19am | 23/10/11

      You don’t have to be an adventurer to die unexpectedly and leave your family without a parent. Crossing the road or driving to work or eating that third donut could be all it takes. Adventurous living just raises the odds a tad, but it improves quality of life for those prepared to take the risk, (which isn’t me). So I say go for it, if that is your wish.

    • Kipling says:

      10:31am | 23/10/11

      Life is a pretty big risk usually. That said, to actively and (more importantly) continuously seek risk for nothing more than a thrill is to my mind somewhat selfish. Of course, if that is what someone wants to do, I am happy to let them join the other candidates for Darwin awards, my sympathy would go to their unfortunate families.

      As to comparing a Thrill seeker to a soldier, police officer or rescue worker though, they are in a totally different league. Sure they both take risks, one is for fun the other is for, presumably at least, the well being of others. Is that not a significant difference?

    • palone says:

      12:54pm | 23/10/11

      You are absolutely right, and the selfishnees of some people never ceases to amaze me. Sometimes it is disguised as ‘heroism’, sometimes as ‘sacrifice’, but to my mind anyone who disregards the welfare and feelings of others to satisfy some “inner need” is just doing a me, me, me dance.
      (Apropos of nothing—- Last year when I came to this forum I considered using the nom-de-plume, “Ruddyard”,both because of my political leanings and because I am a Kiplingesque type of bloke. “If” is a bit of a moral sheet for me. Well, I try. I didn’t use it because the other lot would have had a fit about ‘doubles’, and other crap they think passes for scathing wit.}
      Back to the thread. The reverse of the coin is of course shown by parents, (the pink yacht type), who, for their own glory allow a kid to be thrown to the vagaries of nature so that they, the parents, can bask in the reflection. If she had drowned, (a real possibility), would they have shrugged a few “cest le vies” and soldiered on? Probably.
      Ambos and corporals and firies and coppers, all have a reason to suffer our praises, but heroes have nothing to do with a parent, who thinks of himself, not the children he raises.
      It’s not Tuesday, but Nossy won’t care.

    • Cynicised says:

      08:38am | 24/10/11

      I’m afraid I’m unconvinced that altruism is the reason which prompts most people to join the police force or the army. I suggest that they are in fact adrenaline junkies at heart who get a thrill from doing a dangerous,but worthwhile job. I tend to agree with the author here. Dead is dead, no matter whether you were engaged in a “heroic” pursuit or simply a wish-fulfillment. Your children will not make that distinction if you are no longer around.

      Risk-taking behavior is part of the human condition, and if you are inclined
      that way, perhaps the only thing that will slow you down is the gradual onset of old age, if you survive that long. It’s not for me, as I’ve said, but I understand why it imperative and justifiable in others.

    • centurion48 says:

      11:14am | 23/10/11

      Interesting that this article appears on the same day as Lainie Anderson’s piece on home birthing. I consider a woman who chooses home birthing to satisfy her own ego as an extremely selfish act. We all understand why a parent would sacrifice their life to protect their child. Why would a pregnant woman do something that puts at risk a child about to be born just so you can feel fulfilled with the euphoria of giving birth under a frangipani tree.

    • Fiona says:

      12:54pm | 23/10/11

      I think it’s selfish too, but it indicates some level of dissatisfaction with the highly medicalised model that dominates Australian obstetrics.

    • acotrel says:

      04:37pm | 23/10/11

      @Fiona
      I road raced motorcycles regularlt for about 12 years in the 60s and 70s.  It was always done under the control of an MA affiliated club with insurance.
      I have a definition of the term ‘safe’, it is:
      ‘A situation or condition where the risks are minimised to a level which is tolerable to all stakeholders’
      Stakeholders include the public, circuit owners, competitors and their families, insurers.
      I was involved with Standards Australia in writing the ‘guide to managing risk in motor sport’.
      I cannot understand the mentality which goes with mountain climbing, or solo yachting around the world.  Surely the families of participants must have som say ?

    • Fiona says:

      09:09pm | 23/10/11

      Acotrel, you’d think so wouldn’t you…..

    • St. Michael says:

      11:47am | 23/10/11

      “Years on, I’ve softened, because life – wherever or however you lead it – isn’t fail-safe. Weather, circumstances and luck can turn you from a Sir Edmund Hillary into an Alison Hargreaves.”

      There’s a big difference between having to live with the risk of getting hit by a car and putting yourself in situations where the odds of getting yourself killed are inversely proportional to the availability of help and/or resources to mitigate disaster.

      The first is having to live with the fact your shirt is coloured red and you live in a bull paddock; the second is walking up and kicking the bull in the balls.

      Adventurism, in an era of internet search engines can let you look at the top of Everest all day long, is stupid.

    • Amelia says:

      02:11pm | 10/11/11

      Yes, why would anyone want to climb Everest or see the Grand Canyon or traverse the jungles of Borneo when they could stay locked indoors and look at pictures of those things instead?

    • stephen says:

      01:26pm | 23/10/11

      I climbed a mountain once.
      Bout 25 kms south of Cairns a radio station - bout 4 year ago - run a competition for the winner who can climb it first, (I wasn’t the first to finish, cause I was the last to leave, i.e. there was a pub right behind the hill) and my point is this : when I was climbing, I experienced a great rush of the oddest feeling I ever had ... like I just had to keep going, and every 5 or 6 steps, I had to look up, stare and scan, to see where I was headed.
      Strangest feeling ever, and I never had another like it, (but that’s cause I really don’t like heights.)
      Still, I can understand why some climb.
      (Coming down from K2 is where it’s at, or so I’m told.)
      Rather do something else that, is not so much a risk, but can define my pride and self-worth, (other people’s reactions to me just canna’ do it) so I and a few others I keep in touch with don’t bide our time ... time starts now.

    • acotrel says:

      04:41pm | 23/10/11

      I wonder what the insurance premium would be for someone wanting to climb K2, and be sure their fanily didn’t suffer from their self-indulgence if they died doing it ?

    • stephen says:

      09:05pm | 23/10/11

      Well alcho, I don’t think that insurance would come into the thinking of a climber of K2.
      I got a book on climbing and there’s apparently a dozen germans, half a dozen swiss, 15 Americans and ten each of french and Italians, (and they’re all top-of-the-range climbers) who’ll swear that by the time you get to the 8000 metre climbs, the last think you think about is money.

      Energy is addictive, i.e. adrenalin.
      And it’s expulsion is, I would maintain, a lot safer than is the extrusion of drugs.
      Kids, like those at Trinity Grammar, need to move, and move fast and early.

    • stephen says:

      01:43pm | 23/10/11

      And by the way Angie, the reason why the Maoris listened, is because, (and I do not mean to appear rude to the locals) they had more to lose if they didn’t.

    • Flutz says:

      05:46pm | 23/10/11

      Consider the other option and ask how well are kids going to be raised if their parent/s resent them because they’ve given up on doing what they enjoy once they became parents.

    • acotrel says:

      08:52pm | 23/10/11

      @Flutz
      For the parents :
      If you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime !

    • iansand says:

      09:31pm | 23/10/11

      I had a pretty interesting youth.  Got maytagged on the last big rapid on the Franklin after 21 days.  Climbed silly rock walls and had a few falls.  Skied some pretty silly stuff.  Did the occasional 10 day bush walk.  Many, many shorter overnight and multi day bushwalks on dirt and snow.  Many overnight offshore yacht races from the age of about 12.  Bodysurfed 10 foot faces. I still ski the occasional double black line (admittedly playing catchup with the offspring).

      Two things.  Those experiences have taught me that I have the physical and mental capacity to do pretty much anything I want to do, and the organisational ability to survive.  The second is that anyone who doesn’t get it (even if they don’t do it) is not very interesting.

    • marley says:

      07:08am | 24/10/11

      It’s one thing to do it when you’re young and single, and your death will impact only on your parents and siblings.  It’s another when you’ve got a wife and young kids.  I get that you liked adventure when you were younger;  I don’t get it if you’ve got a family and haven’t dialled back at all.  That’s the point.

    • iansand says:

      06:49pm | 24/10/11

      But marley, people who have never done it don’t get it but they are prepared to regulate it.  Voila - the Nanny State.  We don’t approve of the Nanny State, do we?

    • marley says:

      07:37pm | 24/10/11

      Nope, we don’t approve of the nanny state. And so far as I can see, this article isn’t about the nanny state.  Did I miss something?

      This article is about where the balance should be between adventure and responsibility.  When you’re a kid, the scales should be weighted to adventure;  when you’re a young parent, to responsibility;  when you’re an old fart you’re back to adventure. 

      The state has no role in determining how high a level of risk you should take.  That’s up to you and you alone.  But the consequences of your decision may not be yours alone.

    • Craig says:

      10:15pm | 23/10/11

      Interesting that governments insist on food makers putti ingredients into every food product (for health reasons), but don’t require adventure tourism operators to publish statistics on the risk level (deaths/serious/minor injuries based on similar conditions/precautions) of the activity. Or the same for jobs.

      Right now it is easier for people to accurately weigh up the risks of eating a candy bar than to accurately assess the risks of sky diving.

      I am not saying there is a lot of risk - in most cases risks are readily controllable and accidents are due to user error or operator lnegligence - however if the risks were known it might even prompt more people to try the activity (oh the risk is actually that low!)

      Note that while this is nanny statuesque, best to mention and discuss it publicly before someone in the Tourism or Sports departments thinks of it!

    • Reid Wright says:

      12:31pm | 24/10/11

      If you can’t figure out the risk of jumping from a moving plane, chances are you won’t be capable of reading the signs anyway.
      The warnings and contracts are for legal reasons. I’m pretty sure people understand that launching off a platform with a rope on your leg or dropping from the sky from 12000ft could be detrimental to your health.
      Maybe you should start lobbying for more alcohol warnings because i’m pretty sure that guy is causing more grief than extreme sport.

    • Jase says:

      10:27pm | 23/10/11

      I am here for a good time not a long time.. Why spend you entire life avoiding risk only to end up in an old aged care facility or what not, having lived a rather boring life.

      Life is to be enjoyed, its not one big risk assessment. Its not selfish to take risks at all, we are becoming a society of cotton wrapped individuals who are not prepared to take risks in any way shape or form, in our personal lives or in business.

    • Vicki PS says:

      01:07am | 24/10/11

      I don’t understand adrenaline junkies, those who need more and more extreme risks to get their thrills.  Frankly, I think extreme adventure-seeking is a sign of terminal narcissism and probable brain death.  But hey, as long as these nongs pay for their own jollies and don’t expect to dip into the public purse when their odds get too short, I should care less.  But if there’s one thing that makes me want to scream it’s the bereaved loved ones who say, “s/he died doing what s/he loved most”.  We all do—it’s called breathing.

    • The Sandwich says:

      09:31am | 24/10/11

      Yeah because we all should just sit around waiting for that last breath. That’s what you’re actually saying isn’t it?
      Some people like adventure, and sometimes that adventure has risks. So what? They accept them, and live THIER lives. Who are you to say that’s wrong just because it’s not the life you’d live? I assume you have hobbies? Do I have the right to tell you to stop them because you’re boring?

    • Vicki PS says:

      11:37am | 24/10/11

      No, Sandwich, I said nothing about stopping them, merely that I was unwilling to pay for the consequences of their folly.  Natural selection will take care of them in time.  (BTW, are you the one that went AWOL at the picnic?)

    • Reid Wright says:

      12:21pm | 24/10/11

      “That beautiful boy of yours will one day look out across the Tasman and wonder how that grey expanse of water could be so much more special than him” - Glad to see the selfish apple hasn’t fallen far from the selfish tree.
      I have no children, but when (if) they do occur i imagine i’d encourage them to enjoy it while they can. Try somersaults on your rollerblades and play chasey in building sites, just don’t tell me about it before the fact and use some common sense.
      I’ve tried a lot of stupid things in my time from skydiving to somersaults on skis to climbing drunk through second storey windows, but the worst injuries i’ve encountered are whilst on a playground slide, playing basketball and riding a bicycle (none while drunk).
      On average one person dies everyday from using a bathtub/shower in the USA. Fact.
      You must be a dirty girl Vicki PS.

    • Robert Smissen Of rural SA says:

      02:33pm | 24/10/11

      If you’re not living on the edge, you’re taking up too muchroom! !!

    • marley says:

      06:18pm | 24/10/11

      Yeah, but you’re much easier to push off the edge as well - leaving more room for me!

    • Pull Louis Vuitton says:

      12:14pm | 27/11/12

      A honest chum any which overlooks your ultimate setbacks and consequently can handle your ultimate successes.
      Pull Louis Vuitton http://www.fr-marque.com/

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter