On Tuesday morning I was getting a coffee near my Adelaide office when something really awful happened.

Photo: Thinkstock

A little boy aged about four or five wandered up to me on his own as I was waiting at the intersection. He was walking around as if in dreamland. He stepped onto the road into the path of a taxi. A woman standing next to me screamed and I stuck out my arm and grabbed him. His parents were nowhere to be seen.

The two of us stood with him, asking where Mum and Dad were. He couldn’t talk very clearly, and was sort of mumbling to himself.

There was a hotel nearby and I thought he might have wandered out of the lobby. Out front there was a harried-looking couple loading suitcases into the boot of their car and clipping another child into a safety seat. I called out to them, asking if the boy was his, saying he had wandered onto the road. The mother let out a gasp. She grabbed her son by the arm and pulled him towards the car, tears starting to well in her eyes. She said quietly: “He’s got autism.”

If I had to describe the look on this mother’s face I’d describe it as a combination of exhaustion and defeat.

I couldn’t stop thinking about it for the rest of the day and emailed some mates telling them what had happened. One of them has a child with an intellectual disability. He wrote this in reply, which with his permission I have reproduced here, as it tells the stark reality of what these families face. He tells the story better than any journalist could, so this column belongs to him and his family. With any luck it will be read by our more small-minded politicians, people such as Queensland Premier Campbell Newman, who would rather play games than fall in behind the National Disability Insurance Scheme.

“What you experienced as shocking - and it is shocking - was just another day for those parents, and the parents of tens of thousands of other kids with autism or any intellectual disability in Australia.  A mother’s tears that you witnessed are so often a daily release valve to get through the stress of just another normal day - where packing a car can become a life-threatening experience for a child. The whole family is under constant pressure, with the siblings often the forgotten victims of the stress. Divorce rates are upwards of 70 per cent, and you can see why. You can imagine them saying: ‘Why weren’t you watching him? I thought you were on duty? I assure you, that would have been the argument, or the reason for the deathly silence, as soon as they got in the car.

“What you experienced is a perfect snapshot of why the NDIS is so important to parents with intellectually disabled children. Most people couldn’t comprehend the financial pressures these families face. Special vehicles, wheelchairs, safety equipment, medicines, therapists. It all costs a fortune and much of it isn’t covered by any sort of insurance. As a society, we KNOW - from a statistical/actuarial perspective - roughly the numbers of children who will be born with an intellectual disability or will acquire a brain injury during their lives. We can insure for this, just as we insure for car accidents and other life-changing events that we know will occur at a certain statistical frequency. That’s why the NDIS is so important and why some of the hardcore economic rationalists who question its cost just don’t get why it’s so important. The cost of not having it is what can’t be justified.

“I can guarantee that when the parents of that little boy get into bed each night, the last thing they talk about is how he went at school today, what the speech therapist said, how he seemed a bit aggressive or sleepy. They’ll wonder if the medicine doses are right, they’ll talk about the babysitter coming to look after him for a few hours this weekend so they can take his big sister off to netball together, they’ll plan what has to happen tomorrow with the visit to his psychiatrist, and they’ll fall asleep exhausted thinking about him.

“And always, lurking in the back of their minds not far from their thoughts, is the fear of what happens when they’re gone. Who is going to look after him? Will he improve enough to be able to have the semblance of an independent life; will he be able to live in a group house with some supervision? Will he ever get a job at the local supermarket or washing dishes in a restaurant, something they’d view as an absolute victory? Will they have enough money in their will - Hell, how do they write a will that accounts for all the unknowns? – to ensure he’s looked after when they die?”

My mate wrote at some length in the email about his child’s situation. He describes his child’s needs as “relatively basic - no special equipment, just a tricky set of brain issues that are constantly at play”. He works extremely hard and is financially comfortable, and he has to be, as he spends $50,000 a year on childcare. This covers the cost of an experienced nanny who takes their child to a specialist school in the city while his wife takes their other child to a regular school, a babysitter every night because his wife can’t cook dinner or get anything else done if someone isn’t watching their child with special needs, and another babysitter on Saturday mornings so they can do something with their other child. He says most other families are in a worse situation.

“The vast majority of these families struggle financially because often only one parent can work and, as I mentioned, the costs of life are simply but staggeringly higher. That means many of them never get a break from the pressure. It wears them down until it defines them. I see it all the time and it’s so very sad. Anyway, I’ve written more about this than I had intended. If you ever write about the NDIS mate remember that the little boy you saw today will hopefully go on to live a full, fun life, and a life in which the statistically predictable costs of his care can be shared across the community rather than being entirely borne by his stressed-out and struggling parents and siblings. It won’t solve their children’s problems, but it might make that last few minutes before they fall asleep each night just that little bit easier.”

Comments on this post will close at 8pm AEST.

Most commented

72 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • acotrel says:

      07:44am | 26/08/12

      Does ‘Paid Parental Leave’  apply to looking after kids with disabilities ?

    • marley says:

      12:35pm | 26/08/12

      It’s not really about “paid parental leave,” Acotrel - it’s about the constant stress and worry that comes with having a disabled child.  My niece is intellectually disabled, has some relatively minor physical issues and has serious speech problems. 

      She is an adult now, lives with her parents, holds a part-time job at Maccas, flipping pancakes, helps with the housework and goes on month long bicycle trips with her folks.  But she’ll never be able to live independently and she’ll never be self supporting. Although she finished high school, she can’t read or write, she can’t manage her financial affairs, and if left to her own devices, doesn’t eat a proper diet.

      My sister and brother-in-law have both worked for years to build up a trust fund for her sufficient to take care of her when they’re gone, but the GFC put paid to my brother-in-law’s plan to retire at 65.  He’s now hoping to get out of a very high-stress job by 70.  If he makes it that far, that is.

      And they’re the lucky ones.  I’ve got a friend in his mid 60s with a teenage son who is autistic.  Only one parent can work because the other has to be continually available when the boy is not at school.  They have no hope of a comfortable retirement, because of the boy’s needs - constant supervision, on-going therapy, and some form of trust fund.  Imagine the stress you’d be under at your own age if you had to deal 24/7 with a growing teenager unable to communicate or respond, but possessing a teenager’s hormones and aggression.  And you’d know that his future was likely to be bleak because you didn’t have the wealth to provide for him for his lifetime and the state would do a miserable job of helping him. 

      That’s really what this is about.

    • Caro says:

      01:33pm | 26/08/12

      Paid Parental Leave is for six months.
      Caring for a son or daughter with a severe disability is for life.

    • Fake Toowoomba Mayor says:

      07:50am | 26/08/12

      Hi David. I know what your friend is going through.

      My youngest sister is 11 years younger than me and suffers from autism along with an intellectual disability. Mum and Dad had a terrible time coping with her and it also took a toll on my brother and other sister. Thankfully they were able to cope through pure strength of character and determination to make her life better. I am now a father and I am so thankful my son (now 9 months) turned out healthy and happy.

      I would ask your readers to not judge if they see a “naughty child” in a shopping centre or in the street. The child and parents may be at the end of their wits.

      All the best to your friend.

    • Anne says:

      08:25am | 26/08/12

      What the ndis would mean to my family… My child being able to afford a wheelchair that would enable her to get around, sit low to the ground with her peers, and stand.. $45000 dollars. A block of therapy next year that might mean the difference between her sitting independantly or having to rely on others for every basic body movement…$7,500.. A carer or babysitter to come into the home to take some of the pressure off us as parents for just 2hours a week so that bills can be paid with ease, shopping can be done, and therapy for the oldest child with asbergers can be attended and focused on, currently not available as there is no one to provide that care.,And even if there was, no money $20000 for a basic wheelchair equipped vehicle…. Not having to wait six months to access basic equipment and medical appointments to make sure my children and us can get some advice and Help to manage their abilities, medication and general well being… This is only now, as time goes by and children grow to adult hood, the financial strain trying to provide them with the best possible support so they can live a life that is just average, with the same opportunities as everyone else there for their taking…  It’s a human rights issue.  A working, humanitarian disability system, such as the ideal proposal of the ndis would allow some of the most vulnerable members of our society to turn into just members of our society. How can we deny someone this right just because of the money? Surely that fact alone makes the cost of ndis insignificant? Maybe the govt should swallow some pride, and hit Clive Palmer up for a loan. I know I would, in a heart beat.

    • lexpharm says:

      08:57am | 26/08/12

      Spot on - the same happened to me when my Asperger’s son walked into the road aged two. Life has been much as you describe since. Due mainly to his mother’s persistence, he now has achieved Year 12, and has a job at a supermarket.

    • Fair Go says:

      08:58am | 26/08/12

      Pardon my being forward with this, but I do not understand how people believe that ‘sharing the costs’ represents fairness at all. This case represents the strength of dramatisation of stories and how it can make it sound okay to place financial responsibility of oneself onto a group of people (i.e. NDIS). While it is impossible to predict every potential outcome of one’s actions, I think it is more important for individuals to realise that events like having a child with autism can happen to anyone, and to have a clear financial plan accordingly prior to even considering conception.

    • Philip Crooks says:

      09:30am | 26/08/12

      This is meant to be a wind up you are a troll?
      If no I do feel sorry for you, for you the milk of human kindness is vinegar.
      Why not have the courage to use your own name.

    • David Clark says:

      09:47am | 26/08/12

      So… we’ll be taking that medicare card back thanks.  Oh, and next time you try getting anything from the chemist, you’ll be in for a shock.  That price hike was the free ride the PBS was giving you.

      The NDIS is a socialist move.  Thankfully Australians don’t, for the majority have a moronic knee jerk reaction to that word, and know it means a government and society actually caring for its own.  And not being a callow, heartless son of bitch.  Like you.

      PS “Fair Go”  The anonymity of the internet once again encourages the unfettered attrociousness.

    • marley says:

      09:53am | 26/08/12

      @Fair Go - using your logic, we shouldn’t have universal medicare, free public schooling, welfare, aged pensions or any other form of social assistance.

      Sharing responsibility for the less fortunate is part of what makes our society tick. We might argue about the extent to which that responsibility extends (for example, dole benefits to the able-bodied young, or baby bonuses to the financially well off) but I for one think that helping out the disabled, and their families, is a genuine social good.  I certainly wouldn’t want us to regress to the “every man for himself” kind of world of previous centuries.

    • Porra says:

      10:12am | 26/08/12

      @ Fair Go - I am not impressed by your comment. There are a whole heap of nasty conclusions I could jump on the basis of your comment. I just that you are not placed in hall the circumstances or situation described in this article.
      No - actually your comment disgusts me. Autism, intellectual disability etc cannot be planned for prior to conception.

    • Amelia says:

      10:23am | 26/08/12

      @Fair Go, have you never used Medicare, HECS, the first home buyers grant, received the baby bonus, claimed a pension or the dole? Ever called the cops, firies, ambos? Because those all involve ‘placing the financial responsibility of oneself onto a group of people’. So I’m not sure why you’d think handicapped children were somehow not deserving of community support. I can’t actually think of a group of people more deserving.
      Side note, I have lived in the US for four years and as I was reading this article and the first few comments I was thinking how much more generous and understanding Australian society is towards its worse off. If this same article was published on an American site many of the comments would be like Fair Go’s.

    • Bob Stewart, the Elder says:

      10:33am | 26/08/12

      Before considering conception? Fair Go, are you a robot? Made of plastic perhaps or one of those “Do-It-Yourself kits” that talk when wound up? Doing what comes naturally is done when it is natural to do so and not “according to a clear financial plan” What if born with no arms and ears? Send it back?

    • Gregg says:

      10:34am | 26/08/12

      That would be wishful thinking and given how many people are more likely thinking of a Mc Mansion, I really think you have hit on a great means for population control.
      All those singles about and singles clubs and condom manufacturers will love you.

    • Economist says:

      10:43am | 26/08/12

      I think you are looking at it the wrong way, in fact I’d argue that it potentially provides for savings, and productivity increases, certainly more savings than the current system.

      Current services are a hotchpotch of state and federal funding. The states mainly fund services and the feds mainly fund benefits like carers pension etc. Because the states don’t have the same ability to raise taxes, services are under funded dramatically in some states.  THE NDIS will simply centralise a lot of this funding, and be based on an actuarial approach rather than the current approach of a minister determining the allocation, which is subject to other fiscal constraints and lobbying. I believe It will sit independent from federal and state budgets, to some degree, once a funding formula is worked out, but somebody can correct me if I’m wrong on this interpretation. 

      Why productivity improvements and savings. Firstly one national body responsible for funding services. Secondly the focus is on early intervention, this helps to minimise future costs. Identifying a childrens needs early could result in rehabilitation and as a result, depending on their circumstances, they may be able to work in the the future, paying taxes to help fund future services. 

      Thirdly I don’t believe it will be designed to fund care for the disabled 24 hours a day 7 days a week. It is estimated that families do about $30B worth of labour in looking after their family members with disability. The money will be used to provide support, not a return to 24 hour institutionalised care, necessarily, but maybe in some cases. With some pressure off family members they can be more productive in the workplace, less distracted, less stressed. The second parent could rejoin the workforce increase workforce participation. 

      Fourthly service can be better targeted, potentially economies of scale are achieved. Also Imagine if you are a organisation/institution providing support and care. You’re reliant on donations and government funding, in some instances you may need to tender for government funding and subject to government budgets, devoting resources to activities to simply ensure sufficient funding rather than care giving, imagine what achieving some certainty will do with regards to funding.

      A central database can be set up to identify and monitor progress to further determine the efficient allocation of resources, something that I believe is lacking now. This I believe will be one of the biggest costs to the trials and why media headlines of trial money wasted on admin costs are fraught and stupid. By getting it right to begin with we save down the track, data and evaluation are important.

    • Don says:

      10:43am | 26/08/12

      I disagree. It is a fact that a certain percentage of children born are disabled either physically or intellectually and to varying degrees. The reasons for this may be genetic, environmental factors, due to sickness in pregnancy or whatever but it happens across all races and socieities despite people’s best efforts and intentions. So in becoming a parent you run the risk of having a child (at birth or later due to an illness or accident)to raise that stretches your capabilities to the point that financially and emotionally it can become too much and can continue for their entire life.

      I don’t have children now and may never have them but I have no issue with the government disability scheme which is designed to help people financially to try and ease this burden. Personally I would prefer that they put it on the medicare levy scheme so it is fully funded, instead of this ridiculous dance Labor is playing with the states, I take it mainly because they are mostly liberal governments at the moment. It is pretty repulsive in making this a political issue by doing so.

      My main gripe with any such system is to ensure that it goes to those truly in need and not through the loosening of definitions of disabled which would cause it to grow out of control.

    • Sam says:

      10:52am | 26/08/12

      You really should have started that paragraph with, “Pardon me for being small minded….”.  The last sentence is gold.  Award winning ignorance!  Bravo.

    • Inky says:

      10:57am | 26/08/12

      Hoo boy. With all the grace of a drunken sailor you’ve slammed the hornets nest.

      While I’m not a fan of sharing the costs of others, being someone who’s been through plenty of bad times with basically no help from anyone, turning around and saying people should financially plan for things like autism is utterly ridiculous.

    • mear says:

      10:59am | 26/08/12

      This is what we call “social cohesion”. The alternative is a society where sauve qui peut results in a clear increase in a general sense of injustice and, dare I say it, hatred. Further, it is scarcely practical for every single couple to plan for every possible contingency, no matter how unlikely. Get real.

    • Tell It Like It Is says:

      11:05am | 26/08/12

      I find your comments rather harsh and I have no personal experience of children such as David describes. But if there was ever a case for a community sharing cos, this seems unquestionably a legitimate and worthy one.
      Odd that I have never read a similar comment anywhere in relation to the costs to the community from the virtually free-flowing alcohol /availability. Think: policing, ambulance, emergency room, Court time and costs, loss days of work/“sickies” due to hangovers, wasted income which prevents young people saving money for - a home?, social and psychological problems, short and long-term health costs (liver, brain damage). Need I go on? But that is our culture, it seems.
      I am not trying to divert attention from or sabotage this very worthwhile topic. However is it not odd that the “community” generally seems very happy to just accept and subsidise these costs and yet baulk at this essentially unavoidable incidence - as best we can know - of such conditions as autism?

    • Casey says:

      11:09am | 26/08/12

      “Having a clear financial plan accordingly prior to even considering conception”. Really? By that argument we should plan financially for every foreseeable medical problem we could ever encounter in our lives just in case they happen.
      Oh wait…we do - its called Insurance. But most private insurance companies won’t cover special needs expenses so we need the NDIS.
      If you don’t believe we should share the costs then perhaps we should do away with all pensions and government benefits - we all should have planned for the possibility of being disabled/single parent etc, right? While we’re at it lets get rid of Medicare too - I mean if those lower income people can’t afford to go to hospital that’s their own fault, they didn’t plan for it!
      We live in a community and we should act like a community - we already have many programs in place to support people with other disadvantages, I think it would be atrocious if special needs families are left out of this.

    • greenfrog says:

      11:12am | 26/08/12

      Fair Go, you suffer from a distinct lack of empathy.  I work in mental illness and see inequality and ruined lives everywhere.  I also see hope, willing volunteers and workers going above and beyond the call of duty.  We are not individuals in a society , we are a group of people who grow and become enlightened together.  No-one “plans” for autism or mental illness.  But when it happens we need to rally round and be kind to one another.

    • Ashlea says:

      11:14am | 26/08/12

      There is no way on earth that any parent could “plan” financially for a child with special needs!  I can only assume that your comment was said in jest as it is too ludicrous to even contemplate such a thought occurring to a rational person intending it to be taken seriously.

    • sue says:

      11:31am | 26/08/12

      So you also disagree with Medicare, “Fair Go”?

    • Sickemrex says:

      11:42am | 26/08/12

      Having a crash, disease or cerebrovascular event can happen to anyone.  I hope you have a sound financial plan so you don’t place any financial responsibility on anyone else in the event of such catastrophe.

    • Ret says:

      11:57am | 26/08/12

      It’s called living in a civilised society.

    • Phil S says:

      12:04pm | 26/08/12

      It is a ridiculous to propose that every prospective couple have the financial capability to provide the millions of dollars needed to support a child with a disability over the 18 years they will spend raising them (I say 18 years because presumably after that the child could claim their own disability pension? Not that the disability pension is likely to cover everything they need, but that is another topic).

      The mindset you have, that costs should not be shared, is a very dangerous one. To me, it seems you are arguing that a persons taxes should be spent on aspects of society that only benefit them directly, or even perhaps that we shouldn’t pay tax at all? This is a path that leads to the destruction of our society. It leads to isolation, where people don’t care for the greater good of the society, only for themselves. Governments and taxes exist to address the fact that while many individuals are inherently selfish, this behaviour is not conducive to a functioning and growing society.

      I for one am happy that the taxes I pay will go to things that don’t benefit me directly, because I know that I benefit from a better society.

      The perfect solution in my view would be to screen for autism and other disabilities before the “mass of cells” turns into what we define as a human being. This way, pregnancies can be aborted and much of the suffering for both parents and child can be avoided.

      Ironically, many of the people who complain about sharing the cost of helping children with disabilities are also opposed to this plan due to their conservative nature and their anti-abortion, anti-research (stem cell/cloning, etc) stance which is often (but not always) founded in their belief of a magic sky fairy.

      ** Disclaimer: Yes I realise many sky fairy believing people are happy to pay and share taxes to help disabled children, and often do more than others to help out (by working for/donating to charity). But you have to admit the most vocal groups opposed to this kind of plan have religious roots.

    • Personal responsibility says:

      12:15pm | 26/08/12

      You make a fair and legitimate point.  As a society, we are shifting from accepting personal responsibility for the results of our various life choices (one of which is the high duty and financial commitments of raising children) to an expectation that others will bear the costs of the things that can and do go wrong.

      I think there’s a growing sector of society that is choosing not to have any children at all yet they are increasingly being expected to subsidise all manner of family supports.  And it’s no use saying who is going to look after this forward-planning, independent grouping when they are old because they are not only paying for today’s pensioners, they are saving and planning for their own.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      01:31pm | 26/08/12

      I’d rather support the NDIS, than middle class family welfare. Some forms of welfare are necessary. NDIS is necessary, Middle class family welfare is not.

    • gus says:

      01:38pm | 26/08/12

      I am sure you consider yourself a good Christian .but you haven’t an ounce of charity in your hearth.You think : only rich people should get married, only rich kids are entitled to a good education( like that other good Christian Tony Abbott)

    • Lish says:

      02:10pm | 26/08/12

      Personal responsibility- you need an education in so many areas I don’t know where you should start. Societies collapse with that kind of thinking. Economies need to keep breeding taxpayers- if you choose not to, fine- but others have to or we don’t have a society. Your taxes need to go to those who do choose to make new people so that you have a doctor to take care of you in your last days.

    • Porra says:

      02:17pm | 26/08/12

      @ Fair Go - Maybe you should live in the USA where it is user pays for just about everything. At the same time I dare you to publicly renounce your present and future pension entitlements, anything you get under the PBS etc, in fact any and all payments you get from the gov’t. At the same time you can pay a special charge just for you for police, fire, ambos, public education etc and any other service provided for the good of society. By your reasoning your parents should have provided financially for your “intellectual disabilities” prior to conception for the fact that you have shown yourself to be a small minded, ignorant, selfish, and someone who has place themselves outside of the public that our “socialist” or “communist” society provides.
      This is a rant - YES - however I got this attitude for years from ignorant people who have NO knowledge of the effort and sacrifice that the parents of people with disabilities make on a daily basis just so YOU and the rest of our society do not have to pay the true costs of disability services.

    • Jay2 says:

      03:48pm | 26/08/12

      David, your article absolutely nails it for all carers of the young, disabled and eldery Australia wide.
      Caring can be literally a 24 hour, 7 days a week job. No respite and very little help at hand.
      I’m an ex nurse and I can tell you, I really, really believe I could not maintain what these people have too. When my 8-10 hour shift was up, a fresh mind and body took over.’
      @FairGo (oh the irony in that name…)
      Aside from planning just in case one has a child with autism, what about those who are not born with a disability, but through accident or disease finds themselves with one?
      Does one plan for that?
      Have you planned ahead just in case you end up with early onset Alzheimers/? A stroke? A heart attack?Oxygen deprivation from a fire or nearly drowning? A car accident? or any other thousands of ‘what ifs’ I could put to you.
      I presume you then do not want Medicare (funded by taxpayers) to care for you and by the same token, you wouldn’t want my private health fund fees to rise, so naturally you have a plan in action for that as well??

      I don’t believe you would have that same opinion if you’ve ever spent time with a full time carer to see how very much of their lives are dedicated to that special person.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      04:39pm | 26/08/12

      @Lish- What a load of rubbish. Breeder subsidies are totally unnecessary. Protection from misfortunes of life such as illness, short term unemployment, disability is necessary. Middle class family welfare for those who choose to have children is simply wealth transfer, nothing more.

    • Rslph Malph says:

      09:27am | 26/08/12

      The “hardcore economic rationalists” aren’t saying the NDIS shouldn’t happen, but that it is expensive and has to be paid for, somehow. You can have worthy things like NDIS, but be prepared to pay more taxes. If you’re not prepared to pay more taxes, then forget about NDIS (and high quality affordable aged care, and top class schools and hospitals, and do on.)

    • Economist says:

      12:02pm | 26/08/12

      The funny thing is the last round of tax cuts you received from the Rudd/Gillard governments would have paid for the NDIS.

    • marley says:

      12:12pm | 26/08/12

      I’m not happy about paying more taxes, but I reckon there are plenty of ways money could be shifted to NDIS without increasing taxes.  Baby bonuses would be a start.

    • Ralph Malph says:

      01:07pm | 26/08/12

      @Marley

      The NDIS will cost $8 billion a year. That’s about 10 times the cost of the bonus.

      @Economist

      That’s the problem. People want tax cuts and expensive things like the NDIS, and the major political parties are too gutless to tell them that they can’t have both.

    • marley says:

      03:36pm | 26/08/12

      @Ralph - I know that.  It was just an example of a place to start.

    • Genuine Fair Go says:

      09:29am | 26/08/12

      The irony of your name “fair go” is not lost on us. Decent societies have the strong looking after the weak. It is part of human evolution that villages, tribes have all looked after each other. Your views are not a fair go at all. They are an individualistic, only thinking if oneself at any cost way of thinking. Let’s hope you don’t have the misfortune of having to rely on any system or on others to support you at any time in your life.

    • Mick says:

      09:31am | 26/08/12

      I understand the sentiment fair go but wouldn’t ths principle therefore apply to everything we doand every insurance plan we take out? Does one consider the cost of a car crash before buying a Toyota and have a clear financial plan should we crash or ven worse kill someone else?

    • Sam says:

      09:39am | 26/08/12

      I presme Fair Go that you don’t take advantage of the Medicare system then?

    • Anjuli says:

      09:52am | 26/08/12

      @ Fair Go,  Walk a mile in their shoes,if we can give money in aid to other countries ,spend millions on boat people but can’t look after our own then there is some thing wrong with Australia. My Grand son is one of the lucky ones he has high functioning autism ,he goes to a good independent public school who give him his own special needs teacher ,she has worked wonders with him. Who knows what he can achieve in the future . He has had $6,800 allowed by the government which won’t last to the age of 7 ,after that I think all the therapy has to paid for by the parents.I am sure some one will put me right on that . Apparently he is lucky to be living in Perth WA as we are told , people from Asia bring their children over to pay for the therapy they get here as this is the place to live if you have an autistic child.

    • Yak says:

      10:00am | 26/08/12

      “He (She) has Autism”.

      I couldn’t begin to count the amount of times I’ve issued that statement as a broad explanation for the, mostly, un-explainable actions of our wonderful kids. (21year old Aspey boy and 8 year old Autistic girl).

      8pm lock-out isn’t long enough for me to try and explain the daily workings of the Yak household, and most would have no empathy without living the life. Suffice it to say, it’s an adventure. But we are the lucky ones. We have survived the 86% divorce rate; mostly as I have chosen to work away and as such, when I’m home, I can take over and give Mrs. Yak a break. (Her idea of a break was to get a casual job for the week I’m home, it’s her therapy).

      I will leave a response to @Fair Go to others who may have more keyboard control.

      The biggest joke was giving Steve Vizard “Father of the Year” because he gave his kids a choice of which European country they would like to live in for a year. Mrs. Yak is Father, Mother, Wife, Therapist, Educator, et al, of the Year every day, and my love and admiration for her grows with her ongoing dedication and strength of character.

    • Stinky Pete says:

      10:23am | 26/08/12

      I don’t get why my disabled cousin, (Cerebral Palsy),  in the UK have Government supplied wheelchair enabled vehicle and solid carers allowance and government provided therapy etc.. and we can’t get the same for people here in the lucky country. Lucky for some.

      My cousin was able to come to Australia for a once in a lifetime trip and loved it so much he wanted to stay. The unfortunate truth is that even if the Australian Government would let him immigrate, he wouldn’t have the same level of support afforded by the UK Government so nice place to live so long as your not disabled.

      NDIS would seem to be an excellent idea, I am concerned about how this government will implement it as they don’t have a great track record for implementation, but I think we should all get behind it. A measure of a country is how well it looks after those less fortunate in the community.

    • Yak says:

      12:31pm | 26/08/12

      UK to Australia?

      People can’t even re-locate to a different State in Australia due to the varying policies and requirements in EVERY State. Who would go through all that bullshit again? Certainly not people who have been through the laborious, belittling and frustrating processes previously.

    • Gregg says:

      10:32am | 26/08/12

      ” and it is shocking - was just another day for those parents, and the parents of tens of thousands of other kids with autism or any intellectual disability in Australia.  A mother’s tears that you witnessed are so often a daily release valve to get through the stress of just another normal day “
      encapsulates just how difficult it’ll always be for anyone to consider how things are with any situations without being there yourself.
      Have a walk in my shoes so to speak.

      The other side of the coin is how as a society we have changed and are our expectations largely too different nowadays.
      Are we actually seeing a greater percentage of children born with disabilities or attaining them via development or accidents?

      For if not, should we not ask ourselves how families have coped in the past and are there any good aspects of that which we should attempt to engender into our current lives, closeness of families for instance and family support.
      Have we been too busy keeping up with the Jones to really know what is important in life.

      I do not see it so much these days but in the past I’ve seen some parents have young children wearing a harness type strapping with a leash connecting them to the parent.
      It may seem cumbersome but if I was a parent in a city environment with a potentially wayward child, I’d reckon something like that ought to be mandatory.

      Even that has a cost and your friend David as you say is fortunate in having solid employment, something many do not and many in situations more likely as Anne describes and reliant on publicly funded help.
      Unfortunately, the NDIS does not seem to being pushed much as most insurance schemes are in having a life span premium approach where the hit on the pocket is seemingly far less in a progressive fashion but a multi billion $$$$ approach to catch up it would appear.

      Comparing that to Campbell Newman and cost cutting is not too novel David and should we not better face the reality of cost cuts and funding priorities.
      Campbell Newman has been left a tens of billions $$$$ debt for the state of Queensland and it is much the same in other states where Labor governments previously ruled, there being little reason to consider it being any different federally and in fact the current government has raised borrowing limits.

      Where will it end and certainly if we just have governments of all levels keep borrowing more and more, there is no mistaking that interest bills alone keep climbing and thus governments will have even less capital to fund more worthy causes.
      And then we do have or should want governments to face up to looking at priorities and for instance what should we have, the NDIS, Gonksky Education spending on top of the BER mind you, the NBN, a VFT! and now talk of military work experience! and I thought that was what recruit courses were for.

      Yep, all sorts of expectations we have developed and yet not too much thought on how anything ought to be afforded.
      Surely, if there is way too much fat in public services departments, that is one way on cutting back on what we cannot afford and is not needed to be afforded so something like the NDIS can be.

      If we take a look at how some things for parliamentarians can take four years to be investigated, there must be a lot of fat about I’d reckon.

      The next big problem is what might be accepted in the NDIS and who decides.
      Just a week ago I think it was, there was a report on doctors finding another description for what some might say just needed a few more clips over the ear.
      If life could be so much simpler, especially for those in real need, but somehow I doubt that it will be.

    • Peter says:

      10:42am | 26/08/12

      Thank you David for this story and for your friend’s permission to share theirs. It cut to the heart of why something like the NDIS is so very much needed. Our country will be measured on its capacity to share some of its wealth to support people in this situation

    • Robyne says:

      10:58am | 26/08/12

      So basically Fair Go you are saying that that if you are unlucky enough to have a child with a disability, through no fault of your own, then you should have to take all of the responsibility for the financial and social consequences on your own? What ever happened to “it takes a village to raise a child”?

    • Emma says:

      06:23pm | 26/08/12

      Every village needs an idiot, Robyne! wink

    • Socially Conscious says:

      10:58am | 26/08/12

      Dear Fair Go Says: I pray no one in your family or you yourself never experience a random illness or event which leads to a brain or nervous system injury. Even if you have a Life Insurance Policy, there are many illnesses or random events it will not cover. I bet you don;t have every possible thing that could happen to you, or your loved ones covered in a “clear financial plan” Get real!

    • ZSRenn says:

      11:10am | 26/08/12

      Great Story David but why did you have to spoil it by having a shot at Newman. He has the right and the duty to make sure that the Government gets this correct especially for Queensland.

      With the track record that Gillard and crew have in these past 2 and a bit years and Rudd before her with failed policy. I think it is important this topic is debated to its fullest. After all we are dealing with the worst government in Australian History!

      @ Fair Go are you new here? Welcome to the Nanny State. Love it or hate it Australia is the preeminent version of this planet!

    • Inky says:

      01:59pm | 26/08/12

      ” After all we are dealing with the worst government in Australian History!”

      I’m tempted to retort with a line about that being the biggest hyperbole ever written on the Punch. I mean really, worst government in Australian history? ever?

    • Carramaena says:

      11:14am | 26/08/12

      Fair enough question fair go, so when you travel, do you have enough money to pay for every possible contingency (stroke, heart attack, theft of all your possessions etc) or do you buy travel insurance? As an individual it isn’t possible to pay for every possible “event” and that is why we use a communal pool of funds such as an insurance fund that allows cover for something that is a statistically low likelihood.

    • Angelman Mum says:

      11:20am | 26/08/12

      As a mum to a child with Angelman Syndrome I anxiously follow the creation of an NDIS system in Australia.  Our daughter requires lifelong care, will never have functional speech, motor planning affects her as well as difficult to control epilepsy - every element of her develoment is delayed and I can’t cound the hours of therapy and early intervention that we have undertaken.  Your friend described our lives absolutely perfectly and thank you for sharing this with a wider audience. Especially the conversations we have of a night time about the goals she is kicking or whether we think she is having more seizures.  The conversations we don’t dare to have are the ones about her future as an adult with a disability in Australia, as it is just too painful. We desperately try to create a pattern of normality in our family, but the truth is we need the support of others simplly to get through the day.  Equipment in the thousands, ongoing medical care and the reduction of wages due to her care.  And unfortunately because we have the “wrong” diagnosis we can’t access either the Autism or Better Start early intervention funding - Angelman Sydrome is a rare disorder and falls through the cracks.  Thank you, thank you, thank you for sharing this - please keep on sharing.  As for you Fair Go, no one ever anticipates the support of caring for a disabled child, and it is near impossible to financially plan for this.  I like to pretend people like you are the minority in Australia, or it would strip me of my strength.

    • Blossom says:

      11:36am | 26/08/12

      I so understand, my son had Schizophrenia , he was diagnosed at
      eleven years of age, the torment was horrible, i feel for all the children,
      it is an isolating World, when your kid gets hit with the disease of any
      nature, requiring a lot of care.
      No one really understands, really they don’t.
      Walk a mile in my shoes, i feel for you all, i hope you get through this,
      it is hard watching other Kids, play do stuff, your child just can’t.
      Good luck on your journey, you deserve a Medal.
      Bless you all.

    • Skye says:

      12:33pm | 26/08/12

      You’ve got to love someone like @FairGo, makes a ridiculous statement that angers everyone and doesn’t even have the guts to respond to the comments.  The anonymity of the internet allows these people to roam free, enjoying baiting innocent and law abiding citizens who just want the best for their friends and family.  Sometimes it would be nice to see the real people behind these names and atrocious comments.

    • Yak says:

      12:51pm | 26/08/12

      Re: Article photo.

      As all parents of an Autistic child will probably have noticed, the simple and reflexive act of holding your child’s hand just doesn’t happen. This simple act takes years of commitment and dedication (and an ocean of tears).

    • pete says:

      12:53pm | 26/08/12

      Are these conditions more prevalent today, or is there just more awareness of them?

    • marley says:

      01:46pm | 26/08/12

      @pete - I think both points are true.  Certainly, the inclusion of Asperbergers kids (most of whom would simply have been called a bit anti-social 50 years ago) on the autism disorder spectrum has greatly increased the numbers, but there also seems to have been a genuine increase in ASD cases, possibly related to environmental factors or older parents.

    • adult with mild disabilities says:

      01:48pm | 26/08/12

      Anyone with a disability struggles in this society and its fractured uncoordiinated systems.

      I am an adult with mild disabilities, fortunately able to hold a good job. My partner, despite trying, is now unable to find work due to age and heart condition and gets exactly nothing due to my income.
      In my partners case the lifelong effects of a childhood accident limited work options. There was a small payout at the time that was soon used for various expenses and certainly did not consider lifelong income lost.

      A couple of years ago I needed new hearing aids. My health insurance (planning) covered about $2000 of the nearly $10,000 cost. The rest came out of my superannuation - the money theoretically being put aside to support 2 of us in retirement.  The aids allow me to continue going out and be a productive taxpaying member of society. However as a couple without children I see very little for the large amount of taxes I am paying,

      Children and pensioners are eligible for basic hearing aids from the Government services. In between it is assumed the hearing poor person can pay for them themselves from often very low incomes.

      The NDIS is so needed from so many apsects, and the pollies should just get on with it and stop the ideologocally based stalling.

    • pa_kelvin says:

      02:37pm | 26/08/12

      These articles highlight the need for some sort of system to be put in place,NDIS should be explored more, but in its current form is not 100% right. These type of systems should be Federal run ,and not relying on the States.

    • Juz says:

      02:46pm | 26/08/12

      Penbo, that moved me to tears.

    • Dave says:

      02:50pm | 26/08/12

      And as always, the “solution” is another enormous federal government program. How surprising.

    • TheHuntress says:

      03:30pm | 26/08/12

      I consider myself lucky that my son is socially cognitive, however he suffers a debilitating mental illness, which has plagued him for years, at the tender age of eight.

      Every day, even without the extreme pressures that these families face, is a struggle. The constant worry, the constant medical appointments, the constant battles to make yourself heard, the sheer expenses and the fear. The fear that one day the illness will get the better of them, or more scarily, you. Those tears that leak out every so often, that are completely unstoppable, are a symptom of the constant despair and the constant wish that your child will be happy, safe and able to function.

      And I consider myself one of the lucky ones. I am able to work and as my son is socially strong (his biggest strength!) he is well behaved and is able to give the impression of complete normality when need be. He works hard at being ‘normal’ as that is all he desperately wants to be. It is also his greatest wish - to be normal, and then for the whole world to be made of sweets.

      We need an NDIS. Now. Thank you for writing this column.

    • toaster says:

      03:32pm | 26/08/12

      If people really wanted to make a difference, they would support aggressive genetic testing to identify who has a higher chance of producing autistic kids and then help them avoid this (either through egg screening or sterlisation).  We would also be driving for much higher standards in food and environment to minimise toxins that may damage DNA in future parents.

      Otherwise, over the long term, we will just create more and more unfit offspring.  Not a nice fact, but a fact nonetheless.  Nature throws the dice randomly, in the expectation that a certain number will die and not reproduce.  A lot of western society’s approaches in the past 40 years tried to ignore this fact, from allowing a more unhealthy environment to supporting such individuals whereas previously they would have died out.

      And before all the shouty people arrive - I believe that unfortunate people with autism or similar challenges should be supported by society, through taxation, but that unless you focus on the real problem, eventually you will run out of money as the numbers continue to increase.

    • Harriet says:

      07:04pm | 26/08/12

      My unfit offspring is the product of two extraordinarily healthy parents and four hard working grandparents, all of whom lived into their nineties and died in their own beds. My unfit offspring, who is now thirty- five, has three high achieving, professional siblings. He has never had a days sickness in his life and he lives it to the max. He has a severe intellectual disability that gives him a cognitive level of a three year old. There is no known reason for his disability. How do you suggest we should have screened for this? Maybe we have to accept that disability is part of a pluralist society, just part of life. It occurs randomly and families like mine, having cared for a lifetime, need help from our fellow citizens to see our son looked after when we are gone.

    • C says:

      03:48pm | 26/08/12

      As someone with a disability and someone who knows many people with disabilities and their families and who has spent a lifetime advocating for people with disabilities please believe me when I say that, for many parents and/or siblings, it is a “24hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks of the year” job to care for many people with disabilities. There is little (and sometimes no) respite available. The doing away with special schools with the fanciful notion that “integration” will occur has meant that parents now need to get their child to and from school, they need to organise speech therapy, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, aids, equipment, see that the seating in the too small, worn out wheelchair is at least half way comfortable, that the electronic communication device is repaired or that the oxygen supply is renewed, that medical appointments are kept, injections given etc etc etc.
      Then there is that lovely “housing in the community” where the one time residents of institutions now live in filth and muck and don’t get out of bed because it is too much bother for the so-called carers or it is too cold in winter and where the health care is even worse than it was in the institutions and where there is nothing to do all day or, if you are in a mental health hostel , you get kicked out in the morning and left to roam the streets until it is time to go back for a lousy meal and some television.
      Care for people with disabilities in this country is a disgrace. It’s not good in the US either. The UK and Europe have problems (especially with their current financial woes). 
      Most of my fellow advocates are all for the “care in the community” and “integrated” approach but special schools run by parents and charity are on the rise again in other parts of the world. The social experiment simply has not worked the way it was intended.
      An NDIS won’t change that but it might give some people a better chance to get the help they need and - guess what - some of us will end up paying taxes and supporting the rest of you.

    • Tell It Like It Is says:

      04:05pm | 26/08/12

      Why don’t we tax lottery wins to pay for some of the big programs like NDIS?  I never understand why that is so untouchable in this country (Sorry.  Takes me back to alcohol again; the other untouchable!).  Money won on lottery hasn’t been earned it is a bonus and sometimes an obscene amount of money dumped on a person who very often cannot handle it and squanders it. So wasted. In the USA it used to be at least that even if you won a ???? washing machine you paid tax on it. So why not here? It doesn’t impact on the earning level of the average person and it would yield a big amount of badly needed funds. AND it just might do something about the gambling problem.

    • Onlooker says:

      04:50pm | 26/08/12

      Very moving thanks Penbo, I have a little family in my street, just mum and her son, the dad left 20 years ago and has not been heard of since. The son has downs syndrome, he is a lovely man who just dotes on his aging mum. Mum is in her 70’s and her son is 40. I talked to the mother about him, she said he had been a joy in her life but the expense with him through the years has been horrific, she has had to cope alone, she is worrying what will happen to him if she dies. This is just one story, Australia is full of stories of heartache and worry. The NDIS will make some Australian families sleep at night, the worry must be a terrible burden

    • Blossom says:

      06:16pm | 26/08/12

      A Society is judged by how it treats it’s disadvantaged,
      or along that philosophy.
      I hope we don’t become hard hearted ,( every man for himself.)
      We must care, it should be in our nature, not judge,
      not everyone has the good fortune , to have children,
      healthy and fit, and without a disability.
      Life isn’t like that, so we care about you, so life becomes easier.
      Life is precious.

    • Greg says:

      06:52pm | 26/08/12

      No Penberthy, it is you who is small minded. Queensland is going through heartbreak at the moment. 1000’s of people are loosing their jobs, yet you choose to throw this into the mess.

      One day I am sure Queensland can afford the NDIS, but right now the money is gone.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

@ajbau @newscomauHQ More than everywhere else.

tory_maguire

Go @newscomauHQ!! http://t.co/cqclJ0oqrl

Anthony Sharwood

Then this happened. http://t.co/djfEDdnxdF Then we had some chips. Then we wrote some more yarns

Daniel Piotrowski

.@newscomauHQ is now Australia's number #1 news website. WINNING. http://t.co/1iHnDre2Ki

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter