Cricket’s Big Bash domestic T20 league kicked off on the weekend, and if you’ll excuse the pun, the thing was a smashing success.

Warner 1, Warne 0

TV ratings were huge, with over 900,000 tuning in to the match between Shane Warne’s Melbourne Stars and Dave Warner’s Sydney Thunder. That’s the fourth highest-rating show ever on Australian Pay TV.

OK, so the bums-on-seats weren’t as numerous as some predicted, but with people still working and using the precious evening hours to go Christmas shopping, that was to be expected. Just wait till January.

Despite the great TV numbers and the sense of fun which prevailed on the weekend, Sunday and Monday brought the inevitable end-of-the-world rants from jaded sports writers who consider gravitas the highest form of human emotion, even in a game played with sticks and balls.

The Age’s Greg Baum produced yet another column so bitter and disaffected, you really wonder why he doesn’t change professions instead of hissing and spitting about the game he supposedly “enjoys” from the comfort of the well-catered, air-conditioned media centre.

Here is Baum’s take on the weekend action: “So, after a six-month blizzard of spin, gimmicks, quantum illiteracy and increasingly bizarre publicity stunts, the Big Bash League launched itself onto Melbourne with more whimper than bang.” And on it droned.

In February, when Cricket Australia announced the new format Big Bash league, The Punch published a piece with the not-even-vaguely provocative headline “Three cheers for cricket people actually want to watch”.

The basic premise of the piece was that T20 cricket is a game we can all casually enjoy once or twice a week during summer, just as we enjoy the footy in winter. Best of all, T20 need not undermine Test cricket.

Greg Baum didn’t take kindly to The Punch’s logic. Mouth wide open, he swallowed the bait which hadn’t even been dangled for him, in a belligerent and personal attack which was wildly out of proportion to the tone of original piece.

“Writer Anthony Sharwood condemned lovers of traditional cricket as ‘dinosaurs’ and ‘crusties,’ wrote Baum. “It wasn’t about the cricket, you see, it was about him. It was about as punchy as processed ham; it made me proud to be a dinosaur.”

Greg Baum is a well-credentialled sports writer. His Walkley-Award winning piece on the PR bullshit emanating from the Sydney Swans in the late 2000s was one of the great sports rants of the decade. But it’s not for him to tell the rest of us what we like, or indeed what we should like.

The reason I made 25 first person references in that piece, apart from the blisteringly obvious fact that I work for an opinion website, was to point out that yeah, absolutely, you betcha, sport is about me and what I think. It is about millions of “mes” scattered across Australia, who are otherwise known as fans.

We, the fans, are always being told we own the game and we, the fans, are the ones watching the T20 in huge numbers, just as surely as we’ll soon attend it in droves.

There are two main reasons we like it. One is because we are time poor. Families just don’t have the time for a six hour game these days, let alone five days of it. But the other reason we like T20 is that we are mature enough to understand that some sport is memorable, and some sport doesn’t have to be.

That’s the way it is with every other form of entertainment. Explosion movies and Matthew Reilly novels and pop music are largely unmemorable too, but some of us manage to consume them alongside serious novels and art house films and even the occasional classical music concert. Light and shade, people. Light and shade.

In the world of the T20 haters, there is only shade. They should lift up the blinds occasionally. If they did, they’d notice that beyond the silly hype over Warne and Hurley and the rest of it, there are young guys out there who could not only graduate to Test cricket but ensure its future prosperity.

Dave Warner, the T20 cricketer who has cut it at Test level, is suddenly the most important man in Australian cricket. Well, apparently the second most important after a self-aggrandising columnist from a flagging Fairfax daily.

Twitter: @antsharwood

38 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Direct says:

      12:49pm | 19/12/11

      T20 failed by not getting free to air coverage.

      I don’t care enough about to subscribe to Pay TV or get off the couch and go to the pub to watch it.

    • Craig of North Brisbane says:

      01:46pm | 19/12/11

      Yeah, this.  I’d have liked to have watched it, but I’m not forking out for Foxtel for the privilege.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      01:57pm | 19/12/11

      They got over 800,000 people who watched it.

      I have Foxtel and it was pretty good, like 4 or 5 games from Friday till Sunday night.

    • Tubesteak says:

      02:23pm | 19/12/11

      It didn’t fail because of that (the numbers seem pretty good) but I won’t be watching it unless it is on free-to-air.

      I’m not paying for TV because I simply don’t want to (when there’s torrents out there for all the good TV shows long before Foxtel airs them) and I was at a pub on Friday night but it wasn’t showing T20 (some other game of cricket was on from the day before).

      I prefer test match anyway. It’s more enjoyable for me. Nothing against anyone that watches T20 though.

    • David says:

      12:51pm | 19/12/11

      Greg Baum who?????

    • BJ says:

      01:11pm | 19/12/11

      What I find amazing, is that One Day cricket was once heralded as the bringer of death for test cricket. Yet as time has told both forms of the game have grown to a point of complete sustainability. Now with a another form fast approaching a degree of dominance, it will hold a specific niche in todays sporting lifestyle. Most people have not alot of extra time on their hands, or at least they don’t feel like they do. Having an entire match over in a matter of 2hrs would be a godsend to those looking for an aspect of cricket that they don’t have to dedicate a good portion of a day (or 5) to see an end result. But to be fair who doesn’t like the idea of knocking off from work at 4pm on a Friday, heading down to the pitch and being home by 8.

    • rudy says:

      01:18pm | 19/12/11

      You can keep your T20. I’ll be snoozing to the soothing sights and soft sounds of test cricket on the telly again this summer.

    • mona says:

      03:10pm | 19/12/11

      This.

      I mean, I’m actually going to the Brisbane Heat game on Tuesday, and probably more but my god, it doesn’t even compare to Test cricket.

      T20 is nice, but Test cricket gets me through the summer.

      Like, I know we lost and everything, but the sheer tension of that final session of play against NZ was brilliant.

      (Plus, I wouldn’t exactly say David Warner cut it at test level after two test matches and one (granted, very) good score. But he just annoys me, so I’m completely biased and petty.)

    • Wayne says:

      01:23pm | 19/12/11

      I remember the good old days as a kid when the B&H World Series was on.  It seemed like an endless summer of one-day cricket.  Now, T20 is on Pay TV, Test matches are on for what seems like an eternity, for a few blessed weeks of one-day matches before the whole shebang packs up and goes to the sub-continent.

      Like Direct, I am not going to subscribe to Pay TV for the privilege of watching a few cricket matches (even if they did supply in my area, which they don’t).

      More one-day, please?

    • Tim says:

      01:28pm | 19/12/11

      20/20 cricket is a yawnfest.
      The usual formula is either the side batting first make a big score and the second team get out cheaply chasing or the first team get out cheaply and the second team cruise to victory.
      Very few games are close.
      Make it more like baseball with multiple innings and then you’ll have a better spectacle and a more interesting sport.

    • acotrel says:

      04:27am | 20/12/11

      @Tim
      I agree, baseball is much more interesting.  Even lawn bowls is more interesting ! I think I will buy myself a formicarium and save electricity.

    • Arnold Layne says:

      01:31pm | 19/12/11

      The problem I can see with T20 is the level of “memorableness” of it.  I don’t disagree with what you’ve said about it being entertainment etc etc, but it’s not a form of cricket that anyone has yet to show the slightest form of engagement in.  Is anyone going to remember who won the tournament?

      Will its disposability lead to its downfall?  I don’t really know, but I know I could count on one hand the number of truly memorable ODIs I have seen in my lifetime.  Contrast this with the number of incredible Test match finishes we have seen even in the last couple of years and there’s really no comparison. 

      If I’m at the pub on Friday night with my mates, as I was last Friday, I’m going to enjoy the Big Bash, but I enjoy the beers, the conversation and everything else about the atmosphere.  I’m not, however, going to go home being annoyed with the result, or engagine in debate over who should be in the team.

      The thing I’d take issue with though is the excuses for the crowd numbers.  Spin doctors can find an endless stream of excuses as to why people don’t front up for these things but the truth is that if punters want to go to something badly enough, they will.  Some of the excuses I read in the paper this morning were laughable.  I’ve got a genuine one for you though - the people of Sydney and Melbourne cared a lot more about it when it was NSW & Victoria against other States rather than this ridiculous “split the city in half” thing.  I bet the regional fans aren’t all that chuffed about it either.

    • the labor landslide says:

      01:39pm | 19/12/11

      Unless Big Bash Twenty/20 cricket comes to “free to air ” television, then Big Bash Twenty /20 Cricket will remain a rich man’s sport or an upper class sport.

    • David says:

      03:02pm | 19/12/11

      “a rich man’s sport” - buddy go have a look at the majority of viewers of T20 in India - hardly a “rich mans sport”

    • Brontosouras says:

      01:39pm | 19/12/11

      As a cricket fan for over 45 years I agree with Baum.Test cricket is where it’s at. T20 is glorified Tippy-go-Run. It is too predictable.Where’s the entertainment in that?

    • stephen says:

      06:12pm | 19/12/11

      Well it’s entertaining enough, but it does not have the purposefulness or cunning or the emphasis on each ball as a distinct and separate technical act, to leave the impression that if your not on amphetamines, then you can’t play ... or watch.

    • the labor landslide says:

      01:44pm | 19/12/11

      In Rugby football, Rugby union is the rich man’s sport and rugby league is the poor man’s sport .
      What about cricket ?
      Is big bash twenty/20 cricket just a pay television sport for rich people, Coalition Voters, the upper classes and the big end of town??

    • Bretto says:

      08:32pm | 19/12/11

      Mate its $20 a ticket, hardly aimed at the upper classes and big end of town.

    • Mahhrat says:

      02:09pm | 19/12/11

      Two things about the Big Bash:

      One, it’s the deathknell for one-day cricket, not test match cricket.  I love both forms of the game - the hits-and-giggles Big Bash, and the strategic and traditional elements of test cricket. 

      One-day matches, on the other hand, were a 70s/80s masterpiece that showed people you could play cricket in a day.  T20 simply expands that idea to the modern era.  Expect one-day matches to be gone very soon.

      The other thing T20 has done is introduced “teams” rather than “nations”.  The great thing about League, AFL, Football et al is that there are two comps - your league sides (IPL / Big Bash / English etc) and the National squads to cheer as well.  You’re doubling your fan base.

      Finally, if you think T20 is still not serious, have a look at the powerhouse economies behind it - the sub-continentals - and how they’ve taken to it.  T20 is here to stay, is big and serious business, and I reckon it’s exactly what we needed.

    • Aitch B says:

      02:59pm | 19/12/11

      @Mahhrat

      I agree… it’s one day cricket that going to be killed off. There are enough purists around who will continue to support test cricket to keep that version of the game going forever.

      The excitement of T20 cricket has taken over from any excitement there might have been with one day games. In comparison they are as boring as bat shite and I think we’ll see a massive drop in attendances from now on.

      I totally agree on your comments re: the ‘team’ thing. Having a couple of interstate and/or international players in your chosen ‘team’ really spices it up a bit.

    • Jon says:

      03:21pm | 19/12/11

      “Finally, if you think T20 is still not serious, have a look at the powerhouse economies behind it - the sub-continentals - and how they’ve taken to it.”

      For gambling purposes.  T20 only exists to sate the desire of subcontinental countries to bet on cricket.  Shorter matches = more matches = more profit for the bookies.

    • TS says:

      02:48pm | 19/12/11

      T20 has its place on the sporting landscape. The commentary surrounding the Big Bash is akin to the youtube comments on metal music arguing over whether Bieber is the death of music, or whether Slipknot is better than MushroomHead.

      Whoopdedoo to any conclusions drawn. It’s tired and arbitrary.

      I watched only a few moments of the Big Bash, as I just don’t find it engaging enough to sit through (and the ads, music and egregious use of other sideline entertainment is mildly offensive and certainly a turn off) - I’d rather watch a 2minute synopsis of what happened at 11pm before going to bed. And as others have noted, the 50 over game in its current format has a short lifespan (there has been a couple excellent multiple-innings style variations on it that have worked a charm in domestic leagues, that the ICC ought to incorporate ASAP).

      In any event, get rid of 2 match test series’; they’re dreadful and disrespectful in the extreme.

    • Woff says:

      08:17am | 20/12/11

      Now Justin Bieber playing T20 - that’s what I’d like to see. Facing Brett Lee, preferably without a helmet.

      And speaking of commentary (which you weren’t really) - if they want the Big Bash to last on TV, how about getting someone that can string some sensible thoughts together and not just parrot off a lot of tired cliches - often in the wrong place or at the wrong time.

    • luke09 says:

      02:58pm | 19/12/11

      The big bash is LIKE going to watch an AFL game, except you have better weather and a fun atmosphere. If you can find the time to go to a game, go.

    • Liam says:

      03:34pm | 19/12/11

      The Big Bash is fantastic; really exciting and massive potential to bring more people (boys AND girls) round to the great game. As you say, there’s no need for it to be the death of test cricket. Take me, for example - a cricket player and purist - who after watching (and enjoying) all this T20 action, cannot WAIT for the boxing day test. Cricket’s the winner! And yes, time for Baum to go

    • DAVROS says:

      03:49pm | 19/12/11

      Sharwood uses the language of the infantile totalitarian. 
      People who prefer Test Match Cricket are ‘Dinosaurs’. 
      People who dispute AGW are ‘Denialists’

      Suck it up princess - you have been stitched up by a pro in Baum. 
      Learn to celebrate diversity, respect other opinions, and accept that you may not always be right.

      How about you apply a bit of ‘light and shade’ to the AGW debate?

    • Woff says:

      08:19am | 20/12/11

      “Learn to celebrate diversity, respect other opinions, and accept that you may not always be right.”

      Did you send the same comment to Baum?

    • Bill says:

      05:47pm | 19/12/11

      24,000 people turned up to the Melbourne game while only 11,000 bothered to attend the Sydney match. Speaks volumes about the level of support for sport in NSW. This state is dragging down the rest of the country. International fixtures should be removed from Sydney due to it’s inability to understand the importance of sport to the national econony.

    • hired goon says:

      08:11am | 20/12/11

      Sport really has little importance to the national economy. Cricket Australia has less revenue than low level companies on the stock exchange.

      You know that, if your local supermarket is one of the big two, it alone probably has a similar annual turnover to Cricket Australia… right?

      I think *your* inability to understand the actual importance of sport, economically, means the right to comment on it should be removed from yourself.

    • stephen says:

      05:55pm | 19/12/11

      Love sport, especially on telly, and at the pub ... makes me drink slower ; well, the golf does anyway, and Mr. Newton’s commentary is a publican’s worst friend.
      But this game, well, it ain’t Cricket.
      These batmen are turning the skills of a hitter to just that : baseball ... where you give the opposing flight a bloody thwack and hope it come a ‘homer’.

      I’ve gone on about this before, I know ; suffice to say, it’s just got no soul.

    • James O says:

      08:27pm | 19/12/11

      It’s probably overlooked by media sports critics and armchair purists but one of the motivating reasons for having pay TV is to view their ever expanding sports coverage. T20 may not be to everyones preference but if you are willing to pay to watch the advertisers and promoters must be very happy indeed, and i’m guessing that an ailing commercial TV channel known for it’s cricketing coverage would have loved to grab some of those ratings too.

    • Justin of Earlwood says:

      07:07am | 20/12/11

      Why’s Warnie playing for Pakistan?

    • rubbish says:

      07:53am | 20/12/11

      Can you two take your bitter fued out of the public sphere and do some real journalism please? This piece read like a bitter little hit back, with little actual analysis of the game.

    • Karlos The Jackal says:

      08:27pm | 20/12/11

      I’m sorry, but I think we need to wait until the inaugural BBL has been run & won before someone can claim a moral victory in this little Sharwood- Baum spat. In Australia, overwhelmingly the response to T20 remains muted & mixed. It will evolve over time, and there is nothing wrong with experimenting with formats etc., & who doesn’t enjoy seeing massiveback to back sixes over the back of the bowler’s head- but in my opinion test cricket still throws up more intrigue & excitement than a little hit n giggle can.

    • Bill says:

      01:26pm | 21/12/11

      Because of the extra physical burden on the players with all the T20 and one day matches, they are not in as good a shape to produce optimum test cricket. And why was there only two tests between Australia v SAF and Australia v NZ at the start of this summer (when at least a third and deciding test would have been great value)? To accommodate the T-bloody-20 that’s why.

    • AJL says:

      01:59pm | 21/12/11

      T20 bores me.  It’s just so damn repetitive and predictable.

      Onto more important things, like how the hell Haddin is allowed within 100m of the Test team while he seems to think that 5/18 in a Test is time to play like a T20?  Or hoping that India cop a bucketload of dodgy decisions that would have been overturned by the DRS, to punish them for their arrogant refusal to use it?

    • steve says:

      08:10pm | 21/12/11

      What about the commentary ?
      All of a sudden , all of a sudden , all of a sudden , all of a sudden.
      The phrase is driving me nuts.
      Allan Border , great cricketer ,possibly the most droll commentator of all time.
      And re Mark Waugh , is he suffering from dementia or similar ?
      Woeful , woeful , woeful ....

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

tory_maguire

"If there was no Schapelle Corby there, in a Balinese prison, we'd still be doing it."...

tory_maguire

Bob Carr says releasing Indo kids convicted of people smuggling has nothing to do with Corby...

Anthony Sharwood

Off to @SkyNewsAust to explain on #sportsline why NSW will beat Qld. One reason is we're much less sooky about life. The other is...

ToryShepherd

RT @AustProtParty: Depressed Leftie @ToryShepherd laments Aussie anti-immigration sentiment, says we're haters & intolerant redneck... http://t.co/DLssoRYP

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Who murdered the Arts degree?

Who murdered the Arts degree?

Have we murdered the liberal arts education? That was the final question on Monday night’s Q&A…

Australia, you have nothing to fear but fear itself

Australia, you have nothing to fear but fear itself

Hansonism’s back – and we’re not just talking about Pauline appearing as a sometime…

Wilkie is poking around on the wrong gambling issue

Wilkie is poking around on the wrong gambling issue

Andrew Wilkie has okayed a lame version of the government’s pokies legislation, which he yesterday…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter