Since the dawn of life, there has been death. And since the dawn of death, there have been endless vain attempts, some gallant and some desperate, some real and some imagined, some tragic and some inspiring, to grasp the key that unlocks immortality.

The brilliantly understated grave of boxing champ Sonny Liston reads simply: A MAN. Online memorials are getting a bit more elaborate nowadays.

One of the earliest literary works, the Epic of Gilgamesh, is preserved on twelve clay tablets recovered from the Assyrian King Ashurbanipal’s ancient library collection and depicts a hero’s search for the secret to everlasting life. Jumping forward almost two thousand years, Oscar Wilde’s fictional character Dorian Gray was consumed by his desire for eternal youth.

The human preoccupation with preventing death is as alive today as it was in the times of Ashurbanipal and Wilde.

Google “immortality” and you’ll find, for example, websites for the Immortality Institute, which engages in “advocacy and research for unlimited lifespans”; ImmortalHumans.com, an online newsletter providing “news and developments about humankind’s drive towards biological immortality”; and the official website for Alex Chiu’s “External Life Device [for] Physical Immortality”, a metal ring that is the subject of US Patent # 5,989,178 and that, according to Mr Chiu, “allows humans to stay physically young forever”.

Traditionally, the pursuit of everlasting life has been exclusively within the purview of scientists, writers, daydreamers and cranks. However, the meteoric expansion of social networks and new trends in online business are providing strange new opportunities for the everyperson to extend their worldly impact beyond the grave.

Online companies such as Deathswitch provide automated systems for post-mortem communication with friends and relatives. The program automatically sends information such as a person’s “final wishes, unspeakable secrets, love notes and the last word in an argument” to selected persons once the software “deduces you are dead”.

Eerier yet, Intellitar Inc.‘s Virtual Eternity is a Vanilla Sky-like online community that allows you to “create an eternal legacy” by making a smiling, moving, blinking and talking avatar that “looks, sounds and acts like you”.  The idea is that your family, friends and even yet unborn descendants will continue to converse with this digitised immortal version of yourself long after the physical version has departed.

While such online tools are currently in the social periphery, communication after death has a place in more mainstream online media as well.  Israeli start-up Willook offers a Facebook app that enables you to create an audiovisual or text-based farewell message to be published on Facebook after your death. This formalises an existing trend. For a while now, sick teenagers have been known to ask for messages, videos or blog entries to be posted to their social networking pages on their behalf after they die.

When a friend of mine passed away in a tragic accident a couple of years ago, my Facebook news feed bizarrely reminded me that “104 of your friends are attending Dave’s Funeral. Don’t forget to RSVP!”  My friend’s Facebook page has become a digital shrine, with friends, years after his death, continuing to post photographs, videos, and messages such as “i dont know if you’re still checking facebook but i miss you” and “dude I just remembered that I still owe you a beer”.

As a society, we have not yet had to grapple in any organised way with the potential impact of information technology on the finality of death. Eventually, we will have to. As scientists continue to discover new ways to extend physical life, so too will software developers and businesses continue to come up with new tricks to enable a person’s digital footprints to continue their trail long after the person has died.

Deathswitches and avatars feed our instinctive hunger at least for permanency, if not immortality. But as these tools continue to grow in sophistication and functionality they will begin to blur the definitiveness of life’s most ancient full stop, making it more difficult for those left behind to let go and move on.

I don’t know how I feel about my Facebook homepage reminding me every year about my deceased friend’s birthday. And I would feel strange talking to an Intellitar version of him online. At the same time as providing comfort to those grieving a loss, these tools may in some ways detract from the sanctity of life. Your avatar isn’t you - it’s just some lines of (pretty clever) computer code. Programs such as Virtual Eternity may encourage people to latch on to hollow digital versions of the departed rather than holding onto genuine memories of the real deal.

That having been said, people deal with death differently, and there will no doubt be many who embrace the technological afterlife. What’s more, appreciation for these tools will only increase as future generations become further embedded in the online world. Like it or loathe it, one thing is for certain: it’s no longer just Casper, Frankenstein and Edward Cullen who enjoy the ability to communicate beyond the grave.

41 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Erick says:

      06:05am | 06/06/11

      These are fascinating developments. Add in to the mix that increasing numbers of our friends are people we’ve never actually met, and the ‘continuance’ represented by an avatar becomes even stronger.

      What happens when after-life avatars can pass the Turing Test? If a person appears to us as only strings of text on a screen, then how much is lost by the death if the strings of text continue?

      Where is the “self” located anyway? Is it in the slushy goo of the grain, or in the words and images on the Net, or somewhere else altogether? If my “self” is my thoughts, and if my thoughts remain online after my body dies, am I really dead?

      Lots of food for thought.

    • Erick says:

      09:49am | 06/06/11

      Durr, that should be “brain”, not “grain”.

    • malohi says:

      10:08am | 06/06/11

      Channeling Descartes mate?

      I blog therefore I am.

    • TracyH says:

      11:11am | 06/06/11

      Great article…and an amazingly non anti feminist reply by Erick!! Monday’s shaping up good smile

    • Erick says:

      11:52am | 06/06/11

      Oh, crap. I forgot to blame the feminists.

    • Nick says:

      12:08pm | 06/06/11

      @TracyH

      I really shouldn’t learn to expect anything less from a self-entitled generation of upcoming women that will support any argument that suits their victim complex. It’s amazing that you feel so insecure about your gender identity that you will bring it up in an article completely unrelated to feminism. Let alone the fact that you bleeding heart liberasl will come in here and bash someone for an opinion that the legitimately present with an array of sources and facts.

      @Erick

      What you’re deliberating here is called the Ship of Theseus paradox.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_of_Theseus
      Scientists have yet to discover in what exactly our consciousness (which is what our state of being technically is) resides, but once they do, there is a relatively high chance that preservation of consciousness will begin to elongate. That is, of course, unless our consciousness lies wholly in the entirety of our brains, which certainly deteriorate over the ages.

    • Erick says:

      12:57pm | 06/06/11

      @Nick - That’s an interesting paradox. What makes it even more interesting is the knowledge that most of the cells and atoms in our bodies are replaced during a lifetime - with the exception of cells in the central nervous system.

    • Soames says:

      01:47pm | 06/06/11

      Alan Turing was an analyist, scientist and mathematics expert, not a purveyor of spurious singular opinions.

    • Erick says:

      02:13pm | 06/06/11

      @Soames - Thank you for that irrelevant comment.

    • TracyH says:

      02:18pm | 06/06/11

      ...and good sense of humour too, Eric! Nick…sigh…

    • John says:

      02:49pm | 06/06/11

      Erick we die every second

      We just don’t know it, our being keeps on changing. I believe the ultimate self lies in the ultimate truth.  Life it’s self, could be just an evolution of truth. The reality is, we live ultimately in delusion, but gradually over coming the lies to the eventually goal of the truth.

    • BMJ says:

      09:36am | 06/06/11

      There’s some creepy people out there that need some fresh air. Props to the people that take advantage of this part of the populace for financial gain. Well played.

    • andre says:

      09:56am | 06/06/11

      Only recipe for eternal life is accepting teaching and sacrifice of of Jesus Christ.
      The human quest for eternity only proves that we were created for it but because of first man’s sin ,we all as his descendants inherited eternal death instead.
      Evolutionists teach that death is good and a motor of evolutionary advances. Contrary to that ,scripture says that death is an intruder and enemy and scientific research shows that our genomes are deteriorating at alarming rate so our future is de volution , a regress rather than progress.

    • Adrian says:

      10:09am | 06/06/11

      @Andre

      “Only recipe for eternal life is yaddah yaddah bark bark woof woof…”

    • BMJ says:

      10:11am | 06/06/11

      Each to their own I guess.

      But ICB, big time.

    • andre says:

      10:49am | 06/06/11

      @Adrian
      Obviously sir , you have a good understanding what is needed for eternity. Looks like you are watching too much of NG stuff. smile

    • Adrian says:

      12:23pm | 06/06/11

      @Andre,
      I made no such claim - you did. I’m still waiting for you to support it with evidence, otherwise there is no reason for me to take your claim seriously. But I suspect empty gibberish is all you have to offer…

    • Spud says:

      12:41pm | 06/06/11

      Adrian/BMJ

      What would prompt you to trash someone else’s religious beliefs?

      Why would you care?

      If you don’t believe, keep quiet, no need to make an arsehole of yourselves.

      What does it achieve?

    • Adrian says:

      01:37pm | 06/06/11

      @Spud

      >What would prompt you to trash someone else’s religious beliefs? Why would you care?<

      Because other people’s religious beliefs have a way of interfering with my life and the lives of those I care about.

      >If you don’t believe, keep quiet, no need to make an arsehole of yourselves.<

      I’ll keep quiet and stop making an arsehole of myself if you will. I find it revealing that you label atheists who criticise religion as “arseholes” but make no similar criticism of religious believers whose actions really are rude, aggressive and intolerant. Why is that?

      >What does it achieve? <

      Hopefully, if religious beliefs are subjected to enough criticism and critical scrutiny we will see an end to the undeserved priveledging of religious belief in our society.

    • andre says:

      02:54pm | 06/06/11

      Funny thing about thrashing religious beliefs is that Darwinism erroneously called science, is also a religion.  Christianity is grounded in reality and logic. Darwinism or atheism is not.

    • Spud says:

      02:58pm | 06/06/11

      On my bad Adrian,

      I didn’t realise you wore a tin foil hat!  Please continue to be a fruitbat.

    • Adrian says:

      03:21pm | 06/06/11

      @Spud,

      If you disagree with what I have written, you should be able to say why. Or are personal insults the best you can manage? You have nothing substantive to offer.

      Begone, troll.

    • John says:

      05:20pm | 06/06/11

      @Andre:
      Sorry to disillusion you but Darwinism/Evolution/Natural Selection is a science. Religion is belief in something that has no evidence backing it-just pure faith.
      Where is the evidence of “man’s first sin”? What was this sin? This is logic? There is so mch evidence for evolution that only the stubborn deniers would question this-much like climate change deniers. The mere fact that we can map the gene is a huge step forward for Darwinism. Sorry to tell you but your cousin was probably a turnip!

    • Spud says:

      06:50pm | 06/06/11

      Oooooh

      I think he cast a spell on me??? I don’t feel any different.

      Deal out the abuse, but don’t like taking it?

    • Adrian says:

      10:26pm | 06/06/11

      @Spud
      >Oooooh I think he cast a spell on me???<
      Wow. You really are out of your tiny little mind, aren’t you?

      >Deal out the abuse, but don’t like taking it?<

      On the contrary; I welcome it. I offered you a chance to engage in a substantive debate and you responded with cheap taunts. This tells me that you lack the intelligence and integrity to conduct a meaningful conversation, so the joke is really on you.

      I have nothing more to say to you, troll.

    • Spud says:

      05:31am | 07/06/11

      “Because other people’s religious beliefs have a way of interfering with my life and the lives of those I care about.”

      “make no similar criticism of religious believers whose actions really are rude, aggressive and intolerant.”

      “Hopefully, if religious beliefs are subjected to enough criticism and critical scrutiny we will see an end to the undeserved priveledging of religious belief in our society. “

      Cleary it’s you with the tiny mind.  Clearly it’s you who has lost the plot.  Get therapy and learn anger management to deal with your hate crimes.

    • andre says:

      08:56am | 07/06/11

      @John
      Unfortunately John , evolutionism is a religion regardless of how much you dislike the fact. Darwinists teach about evolution of stars, evolution of chemicals, evolution of life, macroevolution and microevolution. Out of above five kind of evolution only microevolution is a scientific fact. Other four are just religious concepts. Microevolution is really a variation of living organisms within created kind. For example zebra, horse, donkey are variation of created kind. So are wolf , coyote, and dog.
      If you want to prove macroevolution to be scientific fact demonstrate in lab , bacteria changing into ameba ,for instance.

      Adam’s first sin was trangression of God’s law that is why Adam died spitritual death and thus eternal the day he did that.
      Apostle Paul writes about effect of Adam’s action and Christ’s ( the second Adam) action.

      1 Corinthians 15:22 says: “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive.”

    • allan says:

      09:57am | 06/06/11

      In the interest of accuracy the story of Gilgamesh is actually about 4,500 years old, not almost 2,000. It’s an easy fact to check.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      11:17am | 06/06/11

      Generally (and that is a key word here), Shrines, memorial’s, newspaper messages, planted trees ect are described as helpfulf for grievers, in that they acknowledge the death and its reality, they acknowledge the significance of the lost person and their importance to the grieved and they provide a “tool” for memorial. So I expect these digital memorials will probably prove to be similarly helpful and therefore - a very good thing.

    • TracyH says:

      11:44am | 06/06/11

      Yes…but Wow…the pressure to have to always be commenting in case others think you are slack!! Too much smile

    • Dieter Moeckel says:

      11:47am | 06/06/11

      Your right warm Tubby, shrines, funerals and memorial are for those left behind. The dead are dead.
      I’ve told my family that when I perish - If I can’t do it somewhere sensibl, they should ring the council and tell it to remove the body - take it to the dump.
      If the council claims that its me they are to tell them it can’t be me because I talk. Once dead I’m no longer me I became a smelly lump of flesh and bones prone to putrefaction attracting flies and their offspring.  It is an un wanted carcase to be got rid of.

    • hot tub poltical machine says:

      12:34pm | 06/06/11

      I’m seriously considering letting Med students use my corpse for surgery practice

    • Dr. Rupert Wahlstein says:

      12:35pm | 06/06/11

      And i’m sure nobody will be sorry to see you go!

    • Fiona S says:

      12:01pm | 06/06/11

      Celine Dions’ song “My Heart Will Go On” was just made for this…

    • andre says:

      12:08pm | 06/06/11

      ...and Celine was made for the song ...

    • bikinis on top says:

      12:42pm | 06/06/11

      my mum is dead 28 may 2011 and she won every argument she has had with me so far.
      thats why her grave is beneath soils with thousands of couch grass seeds and alyssum seeds and her parents are beneath soils with 50 ranunculus seeds June 5 World Environment day.

    • Rich says:

      03:37pm | 06/06/11

      What I want to know is, whether it is acceptable to “Defriend” a facebook friend that has died, and when should you do it? After the 12mth anniversary of their death?

    • Shiralee says:

      04:33pm | 06/06/11

      How said is it that the only way we can be remeber isthrough face book, not real life memories.
      My uncle Tom lived to 102 Didnt have a computer or Mobile.His whole family has real life memories of him, not vertual. And yes we do have Photos.

    • TheRealDave says:

      07:42pm | 06/06/11

      When I die I am ripping off Spike Milligan…unashamedly. On my tombstone I want written: ‘I told you I was sick’.

    • fairsfair says:

      09:54pm | 06/06/11

      I had an old great Aunt who always wanted “May the wind blow free, wherever you may be, for it was the holding of the fart, that killed poor me” on her tombstone. Bless her, I guess that was hilairious back in the ‘20s.

    • TracyH says:

      02:15pm | 07/06/11

      A funny one I read the other day…a waiter’s headstone “God finally caught his eye”

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

tory_maguire

"If there was no Schapelle Corby there, in a Balinese prison, we'd still be doing it."...

tory_maguire

Bob Carr says releasing Indo kids convicted of people smuggling has nothing to do with Corby...

Anthony Sharwood

Off to @SkyNewsAust to explain on #sportsline why NSW will beat Qld. One reason is we're much less sooky about life. The other is...

ToryShepherd

RT @AustProtParty: Depressed Leftie @ToryShepherd laments Aussie anti-immigration sentiment, says we're haters & intolerant redneck... http://t.co/DLssoRYP

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Who murdered the Arts degree?

Who murdered the Arts degree?

Have we murdered the liberal arts education? That was the final question on Monday night’s Q&A…

Australia, you have nothing to fear but fear itself

Australia, you have nothing to fear but fear itself

Hansonism’s back – and we’re not just talking about Pauline appearing as a sometime…

Wilkie is poking around on the wrong gambling issue

Wilkie is poking around on the wrong gambling issue

Andrew Wilkie has okayed a lame version of the government’s pokies legislation, which he yesterday…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter