This week’s release of the 2010 Intergenerational Report by Treasurer Wayne Swan brought the issue of mature-age workers rightly into the spotlight.

Old people - they can still do stuff.


Few issues are as important to our nation’s future as responding to the long-term trend of an ageing population. 

It was therefore disappointing to see the inflammatory response of Coalition Seniors spokesperson Bronwyn Bishop claiming that the Government was demonising older people and forcing them to work until they drop.

This silly and ill-considered outburst shows how out of touch the Opposition is to the challenges confronting the country and the needs of older Australians.

As Employment Participation Minister I receive a steady flow of letters and emails from older Australians who want to keep working and keep contributing to our nation.

Far from being forced to work, these Australians are seeking greater opportunities and support in the work place; most of all they want choice.

For this shift to happen, all of us will need to look very carefully at the barriers faced by older workers, including employer attitudes, work-place discrimination and a perceived lack of community support.

While mature age unemployment remains relatively low when compared to the rest of the work force, the statistics ignore the labour force participation rate for older Australians which is lower than any other demographic group, and below that of comparable economies like the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand. 

Worryingly, when older workers lose their job, they are likely to be unemployed for much longer. Australian Bureau of Statistics research reveals young workers are unemployed an average of 20 weeks, but for people 45 and over the average length of unemployment is 52 weeks.

Mature men are more often affected; particular those with low skills who have had a hard working life in manual occupations. Many will leave the workforce early through injury or chronic pain.

The Federal Government understands it has to play a significant role on the issue, but business must do its bit too.
Where work is highly physical, employers will need to think about how jobs and tasks can be designed to accommodate mature workers and invest in training, workplace design and career paths for older workers.

To help employers make this culture change, the Treasurer and I this week announced a $43.3 million Productive Ageing package. It includes investment in quality training for mature jobseekers and financial support for employers to assist them transition mature workers; helping them to retrain and become supervisors, workplace assessors and trainers.

This funding will be crucial in helping to meet the future skills needs of the country, with older tradespeople being encouraged to take on the crucial task of training and mentoring apprentices.

Funds are also available to assist older workers with a health condition or injury which impacts their ability to do their job.

But the Government’s package is just one part of the solution.

We also know that some employers unfairly and illegally discriminate against mature people when taking on new workers.

That’s why the government recently tightened up laws to clamp down on this unfair and illegal treatment in the workplace. But laws alone are not enough to change attitudes. 

Most importantly employers and younger co-workers need to put aside stereotypes and preconceived ideas about older workers and recognise they are an asset and important resource for their organisation.

There is no doubt maturity and experience are priceless. Mature workers have practical skills, are productive and can mentor younger, less experienced colleagues. They tend to have lower rates of absenteeism, fewer work accidents and show a much greater level of loyalty to their employers when compared to the more mobile younger generations.

And with the Australian economy moving into the recovery phase and skills shortages predicted in the next few years, mature workers will play a vital role in our economic prosperity.

Older workers will not only be needed to help drive the recovery, but to help train the apprentices and younger workers needed for the major projects of tomorrow.

With these challenges, as a community we should be looking to a new form of retirement – one that has a transition, not just a sudden exit, from the workforce. 

Individuals should always have the right to make a choice – this isn’t about forcing people to “work til you drop”, as claimed by Ms Bishop.  It can involve full-time, part-time or casual work, community engagement and volunteering as well as enjoying the fruits of retirement.

If we fail to make the changes and fully harness the productive capacity of mature workers, our economy and our country will be worse off.

This is a complex national conversation which needs to be above petty politics. If people want to work, they should have that opportunity.

21 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Andrew says:

      09:28am | 03/02/10

      Thanks Mark, I will surely take comfort in your ideas whilst I am still working at 70 and you are enjoying an early retirement with your tax payer funded retirement.
      Have a drink for me!

    • AJ says:

      09:46am | 03/02/10

      Andrew, are by any chance Batty Bronnie Bishop’s press secretary?

    • Nigel says:

      09:56am | 03/02/10

      What about allowing people on the pension to earn more before Centrelink starts to penalise them? Greatest disincentive to ongoing workforce participation ever. After all, if you can work part-time, someone’s paying you to be productive. Easy decision. Popular decision. Go for it.

    • Eat The Rich says:

      12:59pm | 03/02/10

      I’ll second this!

    • Old Bert says:

      03:55pm | 03/02/10

      I third this, what’s the bloody use of trying to get a bit of dignity by being useful, we don’t want to earn a fortune, just be of value to our community, to give something back to oldies who can’t mow lawns etc, without having to look over your shoulder. WTF, my income from having served my country is low, even after my lifetime super on top of a bit of Centrelink assistance. Give us a break, there’s plenty who think like me.

    • Nick says:

      10:17am | 03/02/10

      “...It was therefore disappointing to see the inflammatory response of Coalition Seniors spokesperson Bronwyn Bishop claiming that the Government was demonising older people and forcing them to work until they drop”

      I agree that Bronwyn’s response was disappointing, but did you really expect her to remember that working until 70 was actually John Howard’s idea?

    • pete says:

      10:36am | 03/02/10

      You know, there are a lot of people who want to keep working, but are fed up with chasing interest rates, so they opt for retirement so they can lump sum to get rid of the mortgage.
      Why dont you as a government, allow people who are 60 or over and are contemplating retirement to get rid of the mortgage, to access their super for the equivalent of the remaining mortgage and they might just keep working rather than retiring.  You might be surprised at the response rate

    • old fart says:

      10:47am | 03/02/10

      What did someone call it the other day?  oh yes the “baby boomer disaster”  Thanks for the marginalisation there folks.  We’ve been here for years, we were the ones who worked our tails off so that you can have what you have today, which is a damm sight more than what we had.  So we are’nt something that crept up on you, we are not the disaster it’s successive governments that are the disaster. No forward planning, the only thing that came close to managing it was the future fund and thats probably gone by now.

    • Rafe says:

      12:47pm | 03/02/10

      If you haven’t crept up on us, and have been around as long as you say that you have, why are we the ones fixing the so called ‘problem’?

    • Brother Lee Love says:

      01:50pm | 03/02/10

      Pete, sounds like a plan to me, but it makes too much sense for any politician to ever implement it or change their super conditions. They should NOT be able to access their super until aged 55 or over, like the rest of the population.

    • Snowqueen says:

      10:49am | 03/02/10

      Sounds like a plan Pete….oh wait ... silly me…..it would be far too good a plan for any of our Pollies as it makes sense and we can’t have that can we ?
      ah well, sorry must rush ..hey ho hey ho its off to work I go !!

    • Sherlock says:

      11:29am | 03/02/10

      If your so concerned for the aging population then why did you cripple their chance to save for their retirement in the superannuation system.

      When you hit your mid to late 40’s, you start to get the kids off your back, the mortgage is gone or at least easily affordable and probably for the first tie in your life to start to see some disposable income. So when you can finally afford to do some serious salary sacrifice the Rudd government steps up ands says you can only put $25,000 as a concessional component into your superannuation and this includes your employer’s 9% contribution.

      Why. It just another salvo in the class war against the perceived “rich” that’s been waged by the ALP since the day they took office. BTW rich to Labor is anyone who earns over $100,000.

      While this class war goes on and the pollies crap on about “equality”, these same pollies continue to accumulate points in Australia’s most generous superannuation scheme all funded by the same taxpayers they’re waging their class war against.

      It would seem that the ALP believe in George Orwell’s famous line - “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others”

    • Watson says:

      01:07pm | 03/02/10

      My thoughts exactly Sherlock…..why restrict how much we can save in our super? How ‘bout it Mr Arbib?

      And as D’oh says below, how about releasing that Henry report. You’ve been sitting on it for a while now. Is there something in it you find unpalatable? Something the electorate might find unpalatable?

      BTW….good to see your old NSW state Labor mates are heading in the right direction…..still lots to do??? Well, it’s only been 15 years….you are a joke….

    • D'oh says:

      12:53pm | 03/02/10

      Great! Now lets have a look at that Henry review…..

    • Karen M says:

      03:14pm | 03/02/10

      I think its a great idea, older people love feeling needed and this will give them so much pleasure to do some work for Australia and give them some extra money. You will need to convice employers of their worth and convince younger workmates they can carry the load. Some may not be able to work in later years, due to injury ect but I am sure many would love to help Australia. After all they have worked since leaving school and helped build this country during their working life already.

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      05:10pm | 03/02/10

      Hey Mark, how’s this for an idea? How about all us soon-to-be-retired folks get the same superannuation benefits that you and your parliamentary colleagues get? Just imagine how we oldies could stimulate the economy then!

      Apart from clogging up every major road in the nation with caravans, I can’t see a downside.

    • Virgo says:

      06:40pm | 03/02/10

      Batty Browyn Bishop is as old as Ayers Rock herself. I too am a baby boomer and I would love to help out Australia and thanks for including us Mr Arbib, the kids are long gone, and retirement seems endless. I too get offended by some of these kids on here and their comments about Baby Boomers, without us they would not have the conditions they have today and heaven help them whhen we all finally retire. They will have to do the work.

    • Greg says:

      09:00pm | 03/02/10

      Mark, with the amount of work to be done in this state you don’t have time to write articles for the Punch. Now why don’t you and your useless comrades get back to work and fix this once great state instead of denying every report that ranks NSW last by saying NSW has better reporting. Degenerates.

      p.s. I didn’t read your article because I figure no intelligent opinion could be put forward from any Labor member in NSW

    • Matt says:

      09:24pm | 03/02/10

      Mark, if you had any basic concept of economics you would know that there are a myriad of opportunities to improve the participation rate and productivity of the economy without even considering people over the age 55.

      You could start by getting rid of the extra 33% of useless bureaucrats that you and your ALP mates have employed in NSW. They could then be employed in productive jobs, although they would actually have to work for a living which could be problematic.

    • Brian says:

      01:16pm | 04/02/10

      Nice article Mark. However we do not all have access to cheap property developments in Sydney’s East like you and Eric Roozendaal to fall back on, plus the parliamentary pension.

      How is the investigation into those “friends of Labor” coming ?

    • Informed Giant says:

      03:16pm | 05/02/10

      Mark, the country would be far better served if we didn’t have hacks such as yourself in Parliament.  Noone beleives a word you say, esepcially since the whole ‘green jobs’ debacle. Can’t wait to see the back of you and KRUDD.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

RT @lillithtitania: Pictures show Adolf Hitler practising poses for his speeches - and relaxing in lederhosen http://t.co/7Idp5dWY via @news_com_au

Malcolm Farr

More gay marriage legislation than you can point a straight stick at. http://t.co/k2SC4xNp

Paul Colgan

@c41 yes it is.

Daniel Piotrowski

Tomorrow on The Punch: why we're being shafted at the ATM.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

ICB:  If I could offer you only one tip for the future…

ICB:  If I could offer you only one tip for the future…

Welcome to this week’s I Call Bullshit, an irregular regular column on calumny and codswallop.…

Six prominent Aussies with a case of the dreaded “yips”

Six prominent Aussies with a case of the dreaded “yips”

The yips. It’s an old golf term which refers to golfers who lose the ability to putt. They stand…

The humourless hysteria of the holier-than-thou

The humourless hysteria of the holier-than-thou

In I Spit On Your Grave, a young woman is gang raped in a remote woodland. She is beaten and tortured…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Punch on: Open thread 09/02/2012

marley says:

I'm one of the older ones, so I've certainly seen a few changes in my time. When I started school I learned to write with a nib pen, dipped in an inkwell (no, I'm not kidding). My mother became a dab hand at getting inkstains out of my clothes. Flicking ink at one another in the classroom was an essential… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter