Next Thursday, Microsoft releases Windows 7, the latest update to its flagship product.

Yeah, but where's the party?

So far, the world is finding it pretty easy to ignore, other than its widely-parodied suggestion that you welcome the new product with a party.

You suspect Microsoft almost wants it this way, given the colossal flop that was Windows Vista.

Microsoft has never been noted for inventing cool things, so it was no surprise that Vista was not exciting and did not lead the industry in new directions.

What was surprising was just how poorly Vista performed on the average PC, a fact reflected in the business community generally shunning the product in favour of its more stable predecessor Windows XP.

For a company that rakes in more than $US50 billion a year and spends 10% or more of that on research and development, Vista’s cool reception was a significant embarrassment.

The company is therefore hoping that Windows 7 finds a more favourable reception, and for what it is worth it is certainly more pleasant to use than Vista.

It installs easily, has a prettier interface than Vista, adds some nice new security features and does not ask users to buy a souped-up new PC to access its best features.

There’s nothing exciting in that, for two reasons. One is that Windows 7 is Vista done right, so the changes are more cosmetic than under the hood.

The second reason there’s little excitement is that the desktop computer is not where the action is these days.

Instead, the computer industry is trying to figure out how to deliver exciting products that take advantage of “cloud computing,” the new idea of using massive computer farms (called “data centres”) to store data and deliver applications.

There are plenty of cloud computing services out there to try. Hosted email services like Gmail and Microsoft’s Windows Live Hotmail ($US50 billion obviously does not buy talented branding consultants) demonstrate the concept.

New services like Animoto, a great free tool that takes your digital photos and turns them into slideshows, show new dimensions to cloud computing by offering powerful applications that run inside a web browser, instead of on a PC.

Animoto and its ilk show that a computer does not need to be super-powerful to be fun to use.

Google is betting that operating systems like Windows 7 are on the way out and plans to create “Chrome OS”, an operating system for computers that consists of a web browser and nothing else.

Even Microsoft is having a bet each way, as it plans versions of its popular Office software that will run inside a browser.

What does this mean for the average PC user? If you dislike Vista, the upgrade to Windows 7 will be worth it. If you’re buying a new PC, be thankful that it will come with Windows 7, not Vista.

But if you want to be on the bleeding edge, check out the burgeoning world of cloud computing, because that’s where the action is in technology today.

13 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Bytes says:

      05:35am | 15/10/09

      Yawn. Soft advertising for Microsoft. Cobblers. Heard it all before.  *Every* Windows version, every one, since 1993. Its cobblers.

      Cloud computing? Give up control of all my data to a bunch of techno-clowns only to have their system fall over, or run so slack they get hacked by some Romanian chancer pocket-picking, phishing & skimming his way through the clouds? Yeah, sure. Tell ‘em their dreamin.

    • Wayne H says:

      06:51am | 15/10/09

      Gmail was one of the smartest things I have done on my computer. Keeps my system free of all the rubbish. I also use google chrome now instead of windows explorer. I did that out of spite at the amount of times my Xbox crashes. If my car was as bad as my Xbox they would have to take it back.

    • wolf says:

      07:29am | 15/10/09

      Windows? Not interested.
      I’ve been running ubuntu for 5 years now (mainly because I was sick of paying microsoft for the privilege of doing their product testing) and the latest version is easy to install and most hardware just works.
      Did I mention it was free?

    • TechnoBurble says:

      07:48am | 15/10/09

      Wayne, take it you mean spam. How much do you get, for interest? And who’s your ISP?

      I’m with one of the lesser players - pretty good price/service. With my email address shown only as an image on my website,  I get maybe one or two spam a week, though the count ran up briefly in the big bank phish attacks earlier this year.

      I just report ‘em all (phish, “health”, yadayada) to SpamMatters using the ACMA email add-on button.  Just curious - what’s your weekly spam count? Do you use SpamMatters?

      Google up
      ACMA +SpamMatters
      if interested folks.

    • Zeta says:

      08:22am | 15/10/09

      I don’t get all this Vista hatred. You know why Vista doesn’t work for people? Because they turn off automatic updates. I’ve had Vista 64 for a while now, and it downloads between 2 to 4 updates a week. Never crashed.

    • Mark B says:

      08:42am | 15/10/09

      I tested Windows 7 Beta and it was very unstable. When it became available, I tested Windows 7 Release Candidate and have never looked back; it is very good. I have it on two computers, one of which is five years old and has only 1GB of RAM. It runs fast on both the new and old computers. It is impressive. If Microsoft can get drivers developed for the old multimedia devices (video, audio, etc.) they will sell a lot of Windows 7 to replace XP and Vista on older machines.

    • Patrick says:

      08:55am | 15/10/09

      Vista was so terrible for most people because it was ahead of it’s time. It took maybe at least an entire gig of ram just to run the OS, with all its “Aero” rubbish, and at the time it was released, most people’s PC’s couldn’t handle it. Unless you where buying a brand new desktop or laptop there was nothing to gain by swapping from XP to something that gobbled up all your computer’s resources, especially if you where a business that couldn’t really afford to go outand splurge on thousands of new computers.

      Ontop of that, it’s “User acess control” feature was little more than a royal pain in the ass and it’s security flaws where a bit of a turn off.

    • Bonez says:

      10:16am | 15/10/09

      Vista wasn’t too bad as long as you upgraded your PC and waited at least a year after it was released before you upgraded. 

      7 is unreal, it uses system resources so much better, it loads faster, yada, yada, yada….

      Seriously, it is an improvement over Vista and will be on all my computers within the next few weeks (RC already is).

      To the guy using Google Chrome as a browser, I suggest getting rid of that, not because it’s bad, it’s because it sends information back to Google about your browsing habits so as to send you targeted ads.  If you want Chrome, but with a way to block ads and no phone home feature, try SRWare Iron.

      Linux fans?  I love linux as well, but until my kids and I can play the latest games without using WINE then I have to stick with Windows.

    • Christoph says:

      10:48am | 15/10/09

      Leopard wannabe

    • Bob H says:

      10:52am | 15/10/09

      @wolf - well said, I can understand why poeple use windows at work (IT departments have concreted themselves into Microsoft and have no room to move away) but at home linux is so much better, faster and you can get different flavours as well, fantastic.  Did I mention its free.

    • Sloth says:

      03:31pm | 15/10/09

      I was very tempted by linux - even downloaded an Unbuntu distro. Then I came to my goddamned senses and bought an OS that didn’t require me to re-write sections of the kernel every time I changed by DVD burner. And sure, free seems like a good value-proposition, until you count up the hundred of hours you’ll waste typing ‘sudo just play the goddamned flah app, for the love of all that is pure and holy!’ and dozens of peripherals you’ll have to replace, because, after all, being up until three in the fricking morning literally screaming blood at your computer tends to encourage destroying things.

      But linux users just think! The upside is that none of the applications you’ll want to use will work on your computer, and you get to spend a lot of time on message boards talking to hopelessly anti-social nerds with god-complexes while you try and get your computer to work!

    • Chase Stevens says:

      07:53pm | 15/10/09

      I’ve never had a problem with Vista and I probably won’t be upgrading to Win 7 until I get a new computer and Wayne? Get Firefox.

    • Adam Dennis says:

      02:42pm | 16/10/09

      @Sloth, you’ve got me wondering how often you change your DVD burner. I might be unusual in that it’s been nearly five years for me ... but even so, my Ubuntu Linux has never required me to “rewrite my kernel”, and I wouldn’t know how anyway. Everything I need to do is easy; if I need a new app (e.g. video editor, f’rinstance), I just install it free from a point-and-click interface.

      That said, I’ll definitely be recommending to my Windows-using clients that they upgrade to Win7. It’s looking very good for its target market.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

tory_maguire

"If there was no Schapelle Corby there, in a Balinese prison, we'd still be doing it."...

tory_maguire

Bob Carr says releasing Indo kids convicted of people smuggling has nothing to do with Corby...

Anthony Sharwood

Off to @SkyNewsAust to explain on #sportsline why NSW will beat Qld. One reason is we're much less sooky about life. The other is...

ToryShepherd

RT @AustProtParty: Depressed Leftie @ToryShepherd laments Aussie anti-immigration sentiment, says we're haters & intolerant redneck... http://t.co/DLssoRYP

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Who murdered the Arts degree?

Who murdered the Arts degree?

Have we murdered the liberal arts education? That was the final question on Monday night’s Q&A…

Australia, you have nothing to fear but fear itself

Australia, you have nothing to fear but fear itself

Hansonism’s back – and we’re not just talking about Pauline appearing as a sometime…

Wilkie is poking around on the wrong gambling issue

Wilkie is poking around on the wrong gambling issue

Andrew Wilkie has okayed a lame version of the government’s pokies legislation, which he yesterday…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter