Twice a year on a Sunday, my local council arranges a hard rubbish collection day.

More garbage like this and less quality throwouts means more household savings which equates to a stronger economy

For nosey parkers like me, it’s a wonderful opportunity to legitimately rifle through neighbours’ rubbish as they leave it on the kerb for collection.

A few years back, hard rubbish day saw footpaths transformed into makeshift outdoor loungerooms as new-looking lounge suites, televisions, lamps, throw rugs and cushions - unwanted, but in pristine working order - were relegated to the street.

This year’s spring clean-out was different. This year the stuff people put on the streets really was just trash; bits of old wood, broken garden chairs, busted suitcases and soiled mattresses.

And there seemed to be less of it. What changed?

During the property boom of the early 2000s, Australians embarked on a debt-fuelled spending binge. A halving in interest rates since the mid 1990s meant families could afford to borrow twice as much.

Banks were more willing to lend. Supported by rising incomes and low unemployment, we went on a spending splurge. House prices boomed - more than doubling in a decade.

Australia’s debt to household income ratio soared above 150 per cent - one of the highest in the world.

During the height of the property frenzy in the early 2000s, one in 12 Australian homes changed home each year (it has since dropped back to one in 25).

As we moved, we treated ourselves to a few housewarming presents: new furniture and appliances all on the plastic, of course.

At the same time, the rise of China saw the prices of imported appliances, furnishing and gadgets plummet. We stuffed our homes with them and we kicked our old but still perfectly good possessions to the kerb.

That was then. Today, it’s an entirely different story. The GFC was an almighty wake-up call for Australian households.

Our love affair with debt had already turned sour in 2006 and 2007 as the Reserve Bank lifted interest rates to eye-wateringly high levels to cool the inflation created by all this spending.

When the US investment bank Lehman Brothers collapsed in late 2008, sending shockwaves through the global financial system, households really battened down the hatches.

Interestingly, the crisis gave households both the motive (uncertainty) and the means (lower interest rates and stimulus money) to start saving again.

We took that first stimulus cheque and have been squirreling away as much savings as possible ever since.

It’s a double whammy for industries like retail and tourism which are also struggling against a high Australian dollar created by the mining boom.

Retailers’ annual revenues grew by about 8 per cent or more during the early 2000s. Spending is now down to around 4 per cent growth a year - more in line with annual wages growth.

But is it only a matter of time before we return to our big-spending ways?

I suspect not. All the signs suggest the Australian consumer mindset has changed fundamentally.

We have turned our back on debt. More of us are ahead on our mortgage payments. Our credit card balances are shrinking. New loans are down. We are treasuring our possessions once more. We have become more conservative with our finances.

When asked to nominate the safest place for our savings, the proportion of us saying in the bank is at a 38-year high. The proportion saying in shares is at a record low.

National accounts figures suggest households are saving about 12 cents in every dollar they earn, reversing the trend of the early 2000s when we spent more than we earned.

Economists call the trend de-leveraging. It’s what makes the downturns that follow credit crises so protracted. We want to pay down our debts before we can start spending again.

That is bad news for jobs in the retail and property sectors of the economy, which are likely to remain on the ropes for some time to come.

But it is good for the long-term stability of our economy, helping us to build a buffer against uncertain times.

Even if it does make trawling through your neighbours’ trash less rewarding.

Comments on this post close at 8pm AEST

Most commented

20 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Super D says:

      05:52am | 17/09/12

      A friend of mine moved into a new place just before cleanup day. On the day she went out and introduced herself to her new neighbour only to find she’d just met the new owner of her neighbour’s old couch.

    • Me says:

      07:30am | 17/09/12

      Waste not, want not. We wouldnt wanna see good things go to waste would we?  I love going to the tip and the wreckairs. Use to go all the time with my Dad, and still pick good bargains today. Its given me an eye for ‘artistic!’ detail. Love it.

    • acotrel says:

      07:37am | 17/09/12

      We don’t have a hard rubbish collection in Benalla, and the rates are double those for similar houses in Melbourne ! In addition, if you want a low paying job just to keep you going, you need to know someone to get a foot in the door.  It has all the makings of ‘struggle street’ , especially when Baillieu is doing his belt-tightening stupidity.

    • gobsmack says:

      08:00am | 17/09/12

      Lol

      An analysis of macro-economics based on the writers cursory observations of what is being left out on a hard rubbish collection day.

      I’d prefer more empirical data before drawing any conclusions.

    • Ducks says:

      06:02pm | 17/09/12

      Are you trying to say there could be other reasons? Like the increase in people disposing of their old goods over internet sites such as ebay, gumtree and even Freecycle? I know those sites are a convenient way to get rid of things at any time of the year, rather than wait for the twice-yearly curbside pick-up, but i’m just not convinced…

      There is no other reason for one individuals personal (and no doubt extensive) observations on the decline of the availablilty of free furniture.

      You know, it must be the economy and stuff.

    • Tubesteak says:

      08:09am | 17/09/12

      “But is it only a matter of time before we return to our big-spending ways?
      I suspect not. All the signs suggest the Australian consumer mindset has changed fundamentally”

      I disagree. Like a sleeping giant we’re just waiting to wake up and start spending again. People like to consume. It’s part of the hedonic treadmill we’re on as humans. We like all that new shiny stuff to try to beat the Joneses. We can’t help ourselves.

      All that is necessary is a bit of time and a bit of confidence and we’ll be right back to how things were. Economies are cyclical. At the moment we’re in a lull but things will pick up once natural consumption rates in the US reach their pre-GFC levels and the US economy picks up again. Essentially, we’ll catch up to our pre-2007 selves and it’ll be on for young and old once again.

    • acotrel says:

      09:09am | 17/09/12

      The economy won’t pick up while people talk it down and destroy business confidence with inappropriate belt-tightening.

    • Tubesteak says:

      11:46am | 17/09/12

      acotrel
      We’re just waiting for people’s real incomes to catch up with their pre-GFC credit-fuelled incomes. Once that happens it will be back to full-on consumer mode.

      Won’t take too long. Maybe after the next election wink

    • Bris Jack says:

      08:32am | 17/09/12

      Around this area it’s the early bird catches the worm.
      People spend the day cruising around the suburbs and the pick has gone within hours.

      Would it be a good idea if volunteer groups could furnish homes with second hand furniture and save the Goverment’s money.

      “Earlier this year the government estimated fitting out a home for a family of five would cost $7100 and almost $10,000 for very large families. The total bill to taxpayers to equip the homes with everything from beds and bedding to kitchenware and a TV is $6.6 million”

      “Packages are provided through the Red Cross, which was recently given $118 million by the government - 70 per cent of which was for the community detention program”

      “At more than $9100 per household on average for white goods, furniture, TVs and other items, Labor’s asylum house program has proved to be almost 30 per cent more expensive than the $7100 originally budgeted for the average family of five,”

    • dancing4vangogh says:

      10:49am | 17/09/12

      My grandfather always had the idea or ‘consumer balance’ - that is, each time you purchase something, you donate something you already have to a charity. For example - if I buy a new book, I’ll then donate a book I’ve read and kept at home to Lifeline or the local nursing home library. If I buy a new dress, then an older piece of clothing gets donated. Same with a DVD, homewares, etc. I’ve been doing that for 20 years now, and actually ‘panic’ if I don’t give something away after buying something new. I actually gave myself a migraine, and couldn’t sleep properly until I ‘balanced’.

      Presents, gifts, animals and family heirlooms are exempt from this. However, from what I’ve witnessed, some children should not be exempt…(only joking about the kids!).

      I lived in India for a bit, and on return donated heaps of stuff to Lifeline & the RSPCA charity shop. It was like ‘shedding’ and lightening one’s load.

      It’s interesting how for some people, material ‘things’ can be a burden.

    • TheRealDave says:

      11:08am | 17/09/12

      We had our council hard rubbish collection jsut last week, so the timing of this articel is spot on.

      I have no objections at all to people taking any of the stuff I put out - but ffs make sure you stack the shit back up after you dig something out you feral bastards!! I upped one bloke last week that dove into the centre of my pile as he was about to drive off and told him to fix the mess he made. He did, but I bet he would have driven off if I wasn’t there.

      Oh and, kudos to the bloke who took the broken $30 plastic vacuum…..why I don’t know….you did leave the box behind though…

    • McKay says:

      11:21am | 17/09/12

      My council has decided that they will let us nominate 2 times a year for collection, Now therwe is rubbisjh out somewhere in my area ALL THE TIME. I suspect this has less to do with giving pepole choice and more to do with stopping this recycling behaviour.  Shame, now the council and their rubbish contractors own the trash on the streets and want to take it all for profits.  In that case they can pick it up more often and stop charging

    • Audra Blue says:

      11:25am | 17/09/12

      I generally only buy what I need so I rarely have large items for the kerbside collection days.  Actually, the last time I had any items for the kerb was about 5 years ago.  I usually only take out my regular wheelie bin once a month because I don’t produce much rubbish at all.

      I have been doing a massive culling of unwanted items lately but it’s mostly books and clothes.  And I just take them down to the St Vinnie’s shop in my neighbourhood.  The clothes are in good order:  they are mainly things that are too small for me, too young for me or items that I now look at and say “what was I thinking?”

      I have no objections to anyone taking the stuff that I throw out.  I’m happiest if someone can use it, rather than it ending up in landfill.  The last council clean up day, I was on my way to the bus stop and a guy jumped out of his ute intending to pick up something that was left out.  I looked at him and smiled and he stammered something about the items being free.  Poor bugger looked like I’d caught him robbing a jewellery store.

    • colin says:

      11:40am | 17/09/12

      Ah, Hard Rubbish Day; that time of the year where those amongst us who thought that cheap furniture equals value for money are, once again, proven wrong. I like to call it “Fantastic Furniture Day”; every time that I see one of those catalogues, I picture the very same items of furniture out the front of all those houses in Wentworthville and Mt.Druitt…

    • andrew says:

      01:34pm | 17/09/12

      i’ll put something out on the street any day of the year if it’s still in good condition but i have no use for it. This year i’ve put a barbecue, a bodyboard and my home brew kit out - none of which have been there the next day. To me it’s not worth the effort of trying to sell things like those and only getting $20 anyway

    • PeterH says:

      03:41pm | 17/09/12

      I put an old working fridge out the front with a sign on it ‘Free…please take” and it sat there untouched for a week. I then changed the sign to ‘For sale $10 ONO” and that night some bastard stole it. smile

    • Another Andrew says:

      05:24pm | 17/09/12

      Andrew, my brother tried selling an old couch. E-bay, newspaper etc. Even put on the curb with a ‘sale’ sign and amount. After a month, couldn’t sell it. Changed the sign to ‘free’, as he couldn’t be bothered taking to the tip and was gone within the hour.

      I couldn’t stop laughing when he told me the story…

    • just shut up says:

      04:40pm | 17/09/12

      the economy will only be excellent if Labor stays in power.

      Nsewspoll Sept 17 2012
      Labor 50% Coalition 50%

    • Flogger says:

      05:33pm | 17/09/12

      Let’s see what this says .... Zzz one… Hundred percent Liberal. I thought so! Hooray for us.

    • n_dude says:

      05:51pm | 17/09/12

      I use ebay as my unwanted rubbish disposal channel and it often pays

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

RT @BusInsiderAU: Tajikistan Blocks YouTube After Video Of Dancing President Goes Viral - http://t.co/QYCQ6f3m8W

Paul Colgan

@JohnBurnsST I will save you the trip mate - back home around the 17th of December for a couple of weeks

Paul Colgan

@JohnBurnsST Do you know if the SBP will publish that Apple story online?

Paul Colgan

French Soldier Stabbed In Neck In Paris http://t.co/FzmOcCx8RN

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter