It is called the killing season in Canberra for a reason - a curiously fractious time of year when weakened leaders hit the fence - Simon Crean, Kim Beazley and Malcolm Turnbull spring to mind.

Next year, maybe

They are among others, usually in opposition, who have fallen in the dying days of the parliamentary year when earlier optimism among colleagues gives way to disappointment and thoughts turn to another year in the wilderness.

All were victims of the poisonous concatenation of the two necessary pre-conditions for a change: the threat of a challenger and the opportunity while all are in Canberra to bring it about.

That both Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott have survived the season this year without even a challenge is a victory of sorts - and don’t think they don’t know it.

Indeed assuming no further unforeseen moves, 2011 will be an historical oddity: you have to go all the way back to 2004 to find a year in which there has been no change of leader on at least one side of politics.

Think about it.

That year, 2004, John Howard was prime minister and Mark Latham was opposition leader.

There was an election but it changed nothing.

Early 2005 however saw the Werriwa Walloper’s calamitous leadership finally peter out.

In 2006, it was his replacement, the capable but uncompetitive Kim Beazley who looked to be safe before the dream-team ticket of Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard suddenly crystallized offering defeat-weary colleagues new hope.

Of course, that bit of creative thinking worked a treat leading to another change in 2007, namely the defeat of the unbeatable John Winston Howard after nearly a dozen years at the nation’s helm.

Now in 2008, it was the Coalition’s turn to behave like an opposition with Liberals putting the hapless Brendan Nelson to the sword in September.

His replacement, the charismatic Mr Turnbull lasted longer before his support collapsed spectacularly just as the 2009 parliamentary year looked to be over.

That upheaval led to the perverse but as it turned out, prescient choice of Tony Abbott.

Then there was the big one: 2010. Who could forget Labor’s crazy-brave decision to tear down a sitting prime minister in Kevin Rudd, smashing the political chessboard and resulting in a nil-all drawn election, a hung parliament and a minority government.

Even this year, for much of the preceding couple of months, the killing season threatened to deliver again as Julia Gillard’s poll numbers went through the floor.

Yet Ms Gillard lived to fight another day, her resilience under extreme duress impressing even her fiercest critics.

This is no idle assertion. In one of his trade-mark moments of frankness, Tony Abbott admitted as much to Canberra journalists on Tuesday night when hosting Christmas drinks expressing surprise that the Government had not “cracked” under his relentless assault.

It was telling because it went some way to vindicating concerns in his own partyroom that the Liberal leader had so concentrated on blasting the government out that he had forsaken longer term policy rigour.

The other fierce critic is of course the man who wants her job even more than Mr Abbott, the afore-mentioned Kevin Rudd.

While he’s not going away and remains a threat to Ms Gillard in 2012, his 2011 chances evaporated when the PM’s anaemic polling began a slow rise off the bottom.

While the last minute change of Speaker was not typical of the killing season pattern being both a voluntary departure and not a leadership position, it has nonetheless continued the tradition of unpredictability during the final sitting days in Canberra.

Its implications for the Gillard government next year are fascinating, particularly in terms of the Andrew Wilkie ultimatum of withdrawing his support for the Government if it fails to pass his anti-pokies changes.

The sting has come out of that threat and suddenly, Labor is more than one by-election away from defeat.

But like Ms Gillard’s costly carbon tax reversal arrived at after private talks with the Greens party, and her ill-advised secret midnight deal with the same party this week to secure the mining tax, the back-room shenanigans to put an Opposition MP in as Speaker reeks of chicanery.

It has left a nagging sense that the Gillard Government will do what-ever-it-takes to win up to and including elevating an Opposition MP of doubtful quality.

91 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Against the Man says:

      05:36am | 25/11/11

      Gillard/ALP are never going to win the next election. They are in ‘don’t give a stuff about Australia’ mode. Which is great, because voters keep getting reminded that the ‘government’ is all about desperation and trying to keep going despite the CT corruption and constant policy failures and the carbon tax. But this might be the beginning of something interesting. The Rudd factor isn’t out of the equation yet…..........

    • acotrel says:

      07:51am | 25/11/11

      @Mark Kenny
      ‘Who’d a thunk it? A political year with no spilled blood’

      The calendar year is not over yet !

    • Mahhrat says:

      05:41am | 25/11/11

      This is no idle assertion. In one of his trade-mark moments of frankness, Tony Abbott admitted as much to Canberra journalists on Tuesday night when hosting Christmas drinks expressing surprise that the Government had not “cracked” under his relentless assault.

      Because he’s using the wrong weapons.  You can’t bring down a wall with knives.

    • acotrel says:

      06:22am | 25/11/11

      Negative attacks don’t usually suceed in the long term.  These days everybody knows Abbott’s deceitful form, and he has no credibility.  Even the rusted on LNP supporters seem to embarassed to defend his idiocy these days.  There are a few in my circle of friends, and I never mention politics to them in our current conversations.  I actually know what empathy means, and you don’t keep your friends by tweaking a nerve, and reminding them of their own stupidity.

    • mick says:

      07:42am | 25/11/11

      Agree acotrel.  I having been calling for policy discussion on this website for quite a while when all you get from most of the bloggers is mindless, meaningful attacks.  Just like you do from Tony Abbott, who needs to go if the Liberal Party are to regain any credibility whatsoever.

      Maybe Malcolm Turnbull will get another run.  Whilst I do not agree with much of the Liberal ideology I can at least come to grips with having a leader with some intelligence who will debate issues rather than the mindless rottweiler attack mechanism which the party currently has.

    • Alf says:

      08:14am | 25/11/11

      @acotrel. “Negative attacks don’t usually suceed in the long term”

      Does this mean you will finally shut your yap about Tony Abbott?

    • nossy says:

      05:53am | 25/11/11

      I liken yesterdays events to that of a boxing match Mark - poor bloody and bloodied Abbott came out for round 5 of 15 and was immediately decked by Gillard - sat right back on his arse. The previous 4 rounds have gone to Gillard on points but Abbotts 2nds keep urging him on back into the fray. The sad fact is that Abbott really isnt up to top class boxing and maybe should return from whence he came - Fred Brophys boxing tent that tours country shows. Every time this chap swings a punch Gillard has ducked and weaved and yesterday just to show the old outclassed pugilist Abbott what he is in for for the next 10 rounds she gave him a belting. Tony old boy retire before you are knocked clean out of the ring fella!  hahhaah Ohhh how sweet it is!

    • Fiddler says:

      06:23am | 25/11/11

      more Gillard has been scoring own goals. East Timor/Malaysia solution? Explain why either of these are superior to Nauru? Oh wait they aren’t in fact neither are feasible but can’t do something for the good of the country that the Coalition have done before.

      As for points, despite what you constantly say nossy polls do matter. They are 57/43 and that is the highest it has been for Gillard this year.

    • TChong says:

      06:35am | 25/11/11

      great stuff nossy.
      Watch the howling and indignation from the LNPs Punch branch.
      It should be a fun day reading their tanties !
      C’mon now Conservative Pals, no use stamping your feet, ,and holding your breath.
      Yous are stuck with 1 Vote Tony. Until Turnbull ousts him .

    • gobsmack says:

      06:53am | 25/11/11

      @Nossy
      The boxers with no class usually try for an early knockout and come out swinging furiously in the first few rounds.  As it has become more apparent that this match will go the full 15 rounds, Abbott has become increasingly desparate and succeeded only in giving himself uppercuts.
      More popcorn please.

    • Faz says:

      06:54am | 25/11/11

      Yep, good analogy Nossy.

      All Labor has to do next year is avoid punching itself in the face and hoping that the ref doesn’t have a few unpleasant swings aimed its way and they should be able to make up the points lost in the early rounds.

    • Mahhrat says:

      07:03am | 25/11/11

      @Fiddler:

      “...more Gillard has been scoring own goals”

      I agree.  She’s made some real clangers.

      The problem is, her failings just more and more point out Tony’s inability to take any advantage off her over them.

      All he needed was one vote.  Just one vote.  He couldn’t do it.

      You’re defending a guy that had 18 months to beg, borrow, buy or steal just one vote, and he couldn’t do it.

      If he was up against a Hawke, a Keating or a Howard, then fair enough, but he’s up against, “The worst PM in history”. 

      Every time Gillard gets it wrong - and it’s a lot - his inability to find advantage becomes all the more glaringly obvious.

    • Joan says:

      07:12am | 25/11/11

      Desperate Julia digs deep in the gutter to raise Slippery Pete. - the Speaker position handed to a person of disrepute. The Daily Telegraph front page says it all.  and a Steve Barlow comments ` It’s strange that all these slimeball turncoats come from Queensland.` Touchee

    • TimB says:

      07:46am | 25/11/11

      @ Mahhrat but look at the votes he had on offer to ‘steal’.

      Bandt? Not a chance. The Greens aren’t going to support the Coalition over Labor.

      Windsor? Still holds a 20 year old grudge against the Nationals. Wouldn’t vote with the Coalition in a pink fit.

      Oakeshott? This is the man that willingly signed his political death warrant. The one that claims he made a massive mistake in joining the Nationals and that he shares none of their views. HE was never coming back to the Coalition either.

      Wilkie? He may have been the best chance for a swing vote that Tony had, but not as long as he had Julia wrapped around his finger on pokie reforms. That may change now though if Julia decides to go back on that agreeement.

      So in all fairness, Tony really didn’t have all that much to work with. If he had lost Katter and Crook you might have had a point, but as it stands it’s hard to see how he could have done much better.

    • John A Neve says:

      07:52am | 25/11/11

      Joan,
      Maybe you should be in politics, as you sure can muckrake. Now come on Joan tell us all what criminal activity Peter Slipper has engaged in?
      Tell me, do you knit as you think up the rubbish you post?

    • mel says:

      08:48am | 25/11/11

      And Joan, can you tell us why Peter Slipper was perfectly acceptable to the Liberal party at election time, but now is a ‘person of disrepute’? What has he done wrong in the last year or so? Why wasn’t he kicked out earlier by the party? They could have easily won a by-election.

      Or are you saying that people of disrepute are perfectly acceptable as long as they are on your side?

    • nossy says:

      09:53am | 25/11/11

      @Joan - I come from QLD Joan - are you calling me a “slimeball turncoat” my love?  Say great to see you all over the Punch today on Liberal Party Blog Duty - do you get some money for that Joan or is it just for the love of it? Anyway you are doing a great job - 10,000 readers have just switched their vote to Gillard!  hahahahhhhhhhhhh love ya Joaney.

    • nossy says:

      10:09am | 25/11/11

      Dont be too hard on Joan fellas - she lives in Adelaide and not much comes out of Adelaide is there hahha in fact the best view of Adelaide I ever had was out of the rear window of a car speeding north!  hahahha sorry Joaney!

    • luke09 says:

      12:24pm | 25/11/11

      nossy, I’ve read many of your entertaining posts and you have extraordinary articulate qualities. You come across as though you are a sitting member on the Gillard government’s front bench, my guess would be you are Albanese.

      You say nothing good comes out of Adelaide, is Gillard the proof of your statement about Adelaide?

    • Jet says:

      12:53pm | 25/11/11

      John A Neve says:08:52am | 25/11/11 - picking on his favourite punchbag again - what? - got nothing to say about ATM’s niece today -

    • nossy says:

      05:26pm | 25/11/11

      @luke09 one trys to entertain luke but no I am not an MP or anything like that - a simple self funded retiree who lives on the Gold Coast my good man. As for my stir on Adelaide its just to “spike” Joan - but shes way to clever to bite back - hahahha

    • luke09 says:

      12:04pm | 26/11/11

      nossy, keep your entertaining post coming, they are a good read no matter whose side of politics you support.

    • acotrel says:

      05:54am | 25/11/11

      That change of speaker is what’s known as ‘putting the slipper in’ ! Boxers like Tont Abbott should know all about that !

    • Peter says:

      11:11am | 25/11/11

      Abbot put his own slimey slipper into Turnbull but used Minchin and Bernardi to set the scene for him.
      It’s a pity that Mark Kenny chose not to mention Abbott ‘knifed’ Turnbull.

    • Alf says:

      11:57am | 25/11/11

      Like Gillard did to Rudd

    • Northern Steve says:

      06:58pm | 25/11/11

      Abbott did not knife Turnbull. Turnbull called a spill in the leadership to settle an issue, Abbott chose to run, and won. Very different scenario to Gillard/Rudd

    • Groucho says:

      08:53pm | 25/11/11

      Gillard didn’t knife Rudd.

      Rudd sent the office boy to question Gillard’s loyalty - up to that point he’d still *had* it.

      The office boy! At that very point he lost it.  *Then* the numbers were counted.

      She didn’t knife him. She told him to his face.

      Then Rudd called the spill. Then chose not to stand.

      Right. Gillard didn’t knife Rudd. He fell on his sword.

      Thanks for playing. Next.

    • Alf says:

      01:29pm | 26/11/11

      @groucho. Ha, ha, f**king, ha…tell that to Rudd. It sure as shit felt like a knife. He wasn’t bawling in public for being a ‘good sport’ and coping one for the team.

    • Groucho says:

      02:36pm | 26/11/11

      So he criied. Yeah Yeah.

      He didn’t stand. He lost the confidence of his party nad he was replaced.

      You’d ve cried too.

      But she told him to his face.  And he chose not to stand.

      Knife? That’s not a knife. Dolt.

    • Alf says:

      03:49pm | 26/11/11

      @Groutcho. “You’d ve cried too” Actually, I was pissing myself at the time.

    • TChong says:

      05:57am | 25/11/11

      Abbott and his extreme Right faction, have shown themselves to be the most useless, inept clowns that have ever run the Libs , (or LNP).
      TA waqs completely outplayed, and his appearance on 7:30 report only confirmed just how unprepared he was.
      Gillard , and the ALP didnt desrve to finnish the year with such a stunning political victory.
      They were able to do so , because Abbott let his one and only policy- shameless self promotion blind him to the fact he has so little to sell.
      ALP definite winners for 2011.
      The No-alition embarrasing utter failure.
      How much longer will the LNP party machine let Abbott, Bishop, Hockey and Pyne contine to lead them any and everywhere, except to the treasury benches?

    • MarkS says:

      08:06am | 25/11/11

      Ask not for whom the bell tolls Abbott for it tolls for thee. Abbott is in serious danger now. While the ALP position was declining & they had no margin he was safe despite discontent from his backbench.

      Now the government has a margin for error, they are no longer on the edge of the cliff. He has to dig in for the long haul & his tactics to date have been about trying to get an early advantage & going for a quick kill.

      Can he change, will his party room continue to back him if the two party preferred begins to change in the ALPs favour? 2012 may will be the year that he meets to same knife that he used on Turnbull.

      Mind you the most upset MP will be KRudd. He must be fuming. Anything that strengthens Gillard weakens him. Queensland, nothing good in politics ever comes from Queensland.

    • MDG says:

      08:27am | 25/11/11

      On the other hand, MarkS, if you believe some of the coverage, Rudd might be part of the reason Labor was able to pull it off.  It was Rudd whom Slipper invited to his electorate as a guest recently, after all. No doubt there are many entrails to still be read!

    • The Day Will Come says:

      09:31am | 25/11/11

      TChong, I work in Canberra and can tell you the ALP/Greens are going to hold on to power for dear life because even they know (and this is coming from ALP Ministers themselves) that they will never win the next election even with Rudd on board. The thing is if Craig Thompson falls, Mr Slipper gets in trouble for travel expense stuff ups and Rudd decides to throw in the towel, will Labor be stuffed anyway?  Gillard has failed, the carbon tax is not a success because we don’t want it and the asylum seeker issue is pure cock up. Gillard herself is looking nastier and more desperate than ever.

    • Richard says:

      10:41am | 25/11/11

      Yes, MDG is right, MarkS has totally misread this situation. It was Rudd who convinced Slipper to defect. It was Rudd who convinced Jenkins to step down, this has Rudd’s fingerprints all over it.

      Jenkins is close to Rudd’s numbers man in caucus, this whole drama is a plot to white-ant Gillard, and she doesn’t even know it.

    • Ron E Coote says:

      06:31am | 25/11/11

      The Labor cheer squad are at it early today, still frothing over yesterdays sword falling by Jenkins, they don’t seem to understand the polls. If Gillard is going so well, why is her net satisfaction still in negative territory, and why are Labor still languishing on 30% primary vote?
      (Crickets chirping)
      Yeah, she’s doing a GREAT job. Labor are doing fantastically well, and Tony Abbott is such a loser he should just give up any opposition.
      Such blatant fantasy is truly a spectacle.

    • MDG says:

      08:24am | 25/11/11

      Tony Abbott’s net satisfaction is in negative territory as well and Gillard is now leading him as Preferred Prime Minister.  Much as the Abbott acolytes worship at his feet, he is not personally popular in the way that Rudd was when he led the ALP to victory in 2007.  And since Abbott has spectacularly failed to so much as amend even a single Government bill, let alone block any (including the ones he staked his political life on), and has capped off a year of being a serial legislative loser by losing one of his own MPs…well, if that’s his brand of opposition I’d think that the Government would be happy for him to keep it up!

    • james says:

      09:18am | 25/11/11

      Tony’s a loser and will not be leader for much longer.

      He is the ALP’s only hope.

    • RyaN says:

      12:16pm | 25/11/11

      @james: If he is the ALP’s only hope then why is it you GetUp/Labor/Communist Party/Greens are on here day after day desperately spreading muckraking Tony Abbott?
      I don’t get it, surely you would want him to go to the next election, or could it be that you assertion is nothing but pure desperation from a party that is in minor party territory and facing complete annihilation in the next election.
      The longer Gillard holds out for the next election, the longer Labor is just circling the drain of oblivion.
      Lets see what the bookies think:

      1. AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY   3.35    
      2. COALITION   1.31

      Not looking pretty.

    • MDG says:

      12:59pm | 25/11/11

      Come off it, RyaN, I might as well ask why, if the next election is going to be such a cakewalk, the Right-wingers are online day after day to fill every political story with anti-Gillard attacks and calls for immediate elections.  I don’t get it, surely you would want her to hold off as long as possible to keep poisoning the well, or could it be that your assertion is nothing more than pure desperation from a party which knows that its opinion poll leads are softer than newly-fallen snow and just as likely to melt when the blowtorch of accountability is applied…etc…

      Oh, and those same bookies had Labor as a dead-set favourite to win the 2010 election.  The next election isn’t for two years, either.  Would you care to place a bet on the outcome of the 2013 Melbourne Cup today?  How about the 2013 AFL Grand Final?

    • RyaN says:

      01:08pm | 25/11/11

      @MDG: “I don’t get it, surely you would want her to hold off as long as possible to keep poisoning the well”
      If we didn’t care about the rampant damage she is doing to Australia, sure! The calls for the election are we can be spared more assylum seeker deaths, more roof insulation type deaths and not to mention the billions upons billions of dollars pissed up against the wall with nothing to show for it.

      “Oh, and those same bookies had Labor as a dead-set favourite to win the 2010 election.”
      Did they now? Do you have evidence for this?
      Perhaps when Malcolm Turncoat was running the show, I mean that would have been a dead certainty, vote Labor and get Labor/Communist Party/Greens/GetUp or vote Liberal under Malcolm Turnbull and get the exact same thing.

    • RyaN says:

      01:11pm | 25/11/11

      @MDG: “Would you care to place a bet on the outcome of the 2013 Melbourne Cup today?  How about the 2013 AFL Grand Final? “
      Nope but if you gave me the odds on Labor winning for putting a bet on the Liberals winning I would have a piece of that action.

    • MDG says:

      02:54pm | 25/11/11

      Ah, so right wingers are justified and patriotic in their daily whinge about Gillard because they don’t like what they think she’s done, but left wingers aren’t allowed to say anything when they don’t like what they think Abbott has done.  Gotcha.  I wish that kind of unthinking hypocrisy came as a surprise, but it really isn’t.

      As for the betting odds in 2010, it’s not hard to look that up for yourself.  I’m sure the final odds are all there on the betting agency websites.  On August 10 (less than a fortnight before the election produced a hung parliament) Labor was at 1.51 to the Coalition’s 2.54.  Read all about it here http://www.smh.com.au/federal-election/huge-betting-plunge-for-labor-20100810-11vu4.html.  Although since we are two years away from an election, the odds you should really be looking are the odds from 2008, which would have told you clearly that Kevin Rudd was going to utterly destroy Brendan Nelson or Malcolm Turnbull in 2010…

    • MDG says:

      02:58pm | 25/11/11

      Grammatical failure in that post.  My mistake.

    • JennyF says:

      06:51am | 25/11/11

      So Harry Jenkins was not a blood let?

    • Groucho says:

      09:00am | 25/11/11

      Nah. He walked.

    • Enkl says:

      09:49am | 25/11/11

      Mike Kelly tweeted that he was convinced to “take 1 4 the team”. He was emotional as he announced his resignation to parliament, and the gestured to a colleague that his throat had been cut as he took his backbench seat.

      So, yes, he walked, but reluctantly.

    • Groucho says:

      10:23am | 25/11/11

      Bullshit.

      Jenkins himself has said that the “throat cutting” gesture was aimed at a journo in the press gallery with a camera.

    • Alf says:

      12:53pm | 25/11/11

      Groucho - more like Harpo (the dumb one)

    • Groucho says:

      01:14pm | 25/11/11

      Yeah yeah.

      Facts are facts, dolt.

      Suck it up.

    • Mikko says:

      07:19am | 25/11/11

      The change of Speaker was a “voluntary departure”, Mark? Check the Channel 10 news footage showing Harry Jenkins looking up at the press gallery and running his fingers across his throat from side to side. A picture tells a thousand words and it will be interesting to see if this latest move helps Labor in the polls.

    • Joan says:

      07:44am | 25/11/11

      Fronting your boss at 7.30am sounds like a summons to me. And trembling and almost weeping while making the announcement sounds more like a guy with his head on the block. Any respect for Jenkins just went pffft! out the door. No poll points to be gained here for Labor- just confirms what we all knew - GIllard Labor and Co show total disrespect to Australian voter and parliament.

    • Eric The Red says:

      08:46am | 25/11/11

      So Joan when would a good time be to front the boss? As for you saying you had respect for Jenkins, that has got to be the biggest load of shit I’ve heard all year. Going by your posts on here, you hate Labor MPs and Labor Voters. Looks like your tear catcher is getting full Joan.

    • Groucho says:

      09:11am | 25/11/11

      Like getting a tradie when you want ‘em.

      Make sure *you* are the first cab off the rank on the day.

      Works.

    • MDG says:

      10:09am | 25/11/11

      Mikko, Jenkins himself has said that the “throat cutting” gesture was aimed at a journo in the press gallery who had a camera (in violation of parliamentary rules) to tell them to cut it out.  I have a distinct feeling that the gesture is about to become a central pillar of the right-wing mythmaking about the whole episode regardless of the truth.

    • Northern Steve says:

      07:06pm | 25/11/11

      So he voluntarily resigned?  How many minutes do you think Gillard spent trying to convince him not to resign?  How lucky that they managed to find someone just like that to fill the position, and , get a bonus vote or two in the bargain!  Fair Bit of both luck and coincidence there.

    • Groucho says:

      09:01pm | 25/11/11

      1. Yes.
      2. Nil.

      The Speaker v numbers implications have been plain to all incl Blind Freddie since the first “will-you won’t-you” over Speaker & Deputy Speaker roles last year FFS.

      Forgotten Abbott’s role in *that* have ya?  Sigh.

    • john of solomon says:

      07:24am | 25/11/11

      That change of speaker acotrel just shows both Slipper and the Labour lot in their true light,  both are opportunists and are prepared to do anything to retain power and have nothing but contempt for the people they supposedly represent. That contempt is fully reciprocated.

    • Mattb says:

      08:22am | 25/11/11

      Come on john, tell us all what you think, tell us that you beleive tony Abbott wouldn’t do exactly the same thing if given the chance and under the same circumstances. They are all ‘opportunists’, the whole lot of them, it’s their job to be, so go on John, please make a fool of yourself and try and claim that it’s just the one side of our political landscape that’s full of ‘opportunists’....

    • Gary R says:

      08:13am | 25/11/11

      It would be well served to spend some time reviewing the events since before the last election to see where Gillardina and the Hawker Brittan cheer squad began the long journey - or long game as they say.  Give a little here, plant a little slater & gordonite there (union backed $300k), just in case. the worst happens. So off we go - Bob was always in the pocket, Bandt was bent to the labor will anyway; the promises were sops to sops.  no wonder they word Brown’s smirk & started slpping him down a bit. Harry was kept ignominiously waiting and slipper was slipped one, ready nearly 2 years ago.
      the risk - a thomson like but precipitate event.  Self interest kept Oakspott and the sanctimonious seller of farmland for mining in the box. the wookie was easy meat - he suffered under Howard.
      the iron maiden (2) just had to keep her resolve.  Look at her history - she can- Putin would be proud.
      The ‘hysterically inaccurate’ Swan knows a good union when he sees it & Alba’s knees never tremble; he’s from NSW and he knows how to keep his wife elected against the odds & roberston too, so he is unafraid. Shorten? close running mate of the iron one and the slater & gordoned union backed solar lights on the mcg & single gender union (is that affiliated yet?) challenged champion
      The hare has no game against self interest and the tortoise’s planned landscape.  HIs only chance was to run hard at the weakness.
      And the chorus sang ‘wait, long time to the next election, have your fun now but it will turn’. Are they right?

      We shall see; in a way people do not like such bald unionised manipulation when it is starkly in their face.  You may call it a therapeutic massage - for the good of the country but when its administered in dead of night by an inexperienced in the art “Tiffanie”, we will wonder.
      Good luck in the long game; perhaps the longer the game the more the show of hubris - they did it in the ‘sweetest victory of all’; watch them again, they will Keat.

    • Anna C says:

      08:38am | 25/11/11

      Gillard will do whatever it takes to remain in power because she knows that come the next election she and her fellow reprobates will be turfed out of office. Enjoy it while it lasts Julia.

      Every dirty trick is just another nail in Labor’s coffin.

    • The Day Will Come says:

      08:49am | 25/11/11

      Well said and sadly the ALP supporters are too dense to realise this simple and obvious fact.

    • james says:

      09:21am | 25/11/11

      Tony said he would be in the Lodge by Christmas.

      Maybe santa can deliver him a policy.

    • nossy says:

      10:00am | 25/11/11

      @james he meant the “Fishermans Lodge” on the NSW Central Coast James - thats the only Lodge good old Tones will see this side of the year 2050!  hahahh

    • John says:

      11:27am | 25/11/11

      Abbott’s reneging on the agreement he signed on pairing the Speaker has brought him just what his dishonesty deserved.

    • RyaN says:

      12:59pm | 25/11/11

      @james: When? Do post where he said that otherwise you are just like Gillard, a barefaced liar.

    • james says:

      02:00pm | 25/11/11

      Spot on John, another lie from the leader of the lets no participate party.

    • Eric The Red says:

      08:39am | 25/11/11

      Just heard Ray Hadley on the radio saying the Libs are coming out with all the dirt on Peter Slipper and he goes on further to say he (hadley) knew of these rumblings about slippers rorts and said he is not fit to be speaker. What I want to know MR Hadley “You goose” If you knew about this Ex Lib/Nat Member then why didn’t you attack him with the same vigor you attack Labor Members when you found out about Slipper And why did the Libs re-endorse him when they knew he was a serial offender before last years polls? Why did Tony abbott tell the Branch up on the sunshine coast to go easy on slipper? Two faced arseholes.

    • Comrade RyaN says:

      01:01pm | 25/11/11

      @Comrade Eric The Red: And there you are, listening to the same people you call two faced arseholes. Why don’t you just change the channel to the ABC where they will be saying everything a good comrade needs to hear.
      It’ll make you feel a lot better.

    • Eric The Red says:

      02:04pm | 25/11/11

      Ryan did I hit a nerve comrade?  I love listening to Alan Jones and Hadley it reinforces my belief that you libs and your shock jocks have shit for brains and that comrade makes me feel a whole lot better about being a labor supporter. How sweet this week has been. Now get back in the naughty boys corner with Tony.

    • luke09 says:

      02:18pm | 25/11/11

      eric, it could be that the lib/nats didn’t get labor’s dirt file on Slipper until Slipper got the speakers job. Party manoeuvring, leaks and dirt files… isn’t that how the ALP operates?

    • james says:

      02:22pm | 25/11/11

      What a great Christmas present this was!

      I wonder who will be next to defect from the party of noaltion smile

    • Comrade RyaN says:

      03:21pm | 25/11/11

      @Comrade Eric The Red: “Ryan did I hit a nerve comrade? ” Not at all comrade, I am just astounded that someone of obviously superior intelligence than all of us plebs would put himself through that.

    • Joel B1 says:

      08:43am | 25/11/11

      “a voluntary departure”

      Why is it that journalists are always the last to realise?

    • Alf says:

      03:23pm | 25/11/11

      Harry has a big boot-mark on the arse of his pants.

    • Labor is Toxic says:

      06:26am | 26/11/11

      The blood of the speaker obviously doesn’t count .... memories of Rudd’s shameful exit.

    • Aussie taxpayer says:

      09:11am | 25/11/11

      Tony Abbott is the gift that just keeps giving. He couldn’t convince the conservative Independents to side with him, and has done nothing but validate their decision ever since. Then he reneged on the agreement he’d signed about the pairing of the Speaker, and that’s come back to bite him on the arse too.

      Thanks, Harry. We couldn’t have asked for a better Xmas pressy.

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      10:16am | 25/11/11

      Wilkie’s threat to ” Bring down the Gillard Government if she does not pass his pokies legislation” was always & always will be a hollow threat & Gillard had no reason to fear Wilkie.
      He may be able to force the ALP to vote for it. He most certainly can’t force the Independents, Coalition & Adam Bandt to do so. Even if it got through the House of Reps their is no guarantee that it would get through the Senate.
      I doubt this legislation is Double Dissolution material & in any case if it was Wilkie, along, in all probability, with the Greens & the Independents, would be tossed out on his arse for Double Dissolution Elections always polarise the electorate and favour the two major parties - both of whom believe they ” Were born to rule”!!

    • Aitch B says:

      11:16am | 25/11/11

      I heard Bill Shorten say this morning that Slipper is the best man for the job because he’s held the Deputy Speaker’s position for a ‘long time’. 18 months hardly seems a long time to me. It would be interesting to know how much time he’s actually spent ‘in the chair’ during that period.

      I don’t believe the ‘best man for the job’ line that the goverment is taking.

      Obviously Slipper is not squeaky clean given his history. Putting aside parliamentary custom, what happened yesterday and all the political viewpoints on that, I would have thought there were far more suitable candidates on both sides of the house - especially ones with no axes to grind like Slipper has.

    • Gary R says:

      11:50am | 25/11/11

      he’s squeaky clean compared to the union games exposed about housing in melbourne (a certain first lady and Shorten involved in that one) & the gaming of wilkinson with the HSU.

    • Rachel Laurel says:

      12:42pm | 25/11/11

      December has been a month of federal party leadership changes in major federal political parties in federal politics in the past.
      Tony Abbott will be put on the backbench before Xmas.
      Santa Claus will replace him as Opposition Leader!

    • RyaN says:

      01:02pm | 25/11/11

      Oh the desperate whine, its hilarious!

    • rachel laurel says:

      12:44pm | 25/11/11

      “Forget ancient history ! It’s irrelevant ! Whats past is past”
      Tony Abbott
      November 24 2011

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      01:37pm | 25/11/11

      Maybe Abbott has pulled the fastest trick in the book by getting Gillard to take on Slipper! The man’s publicised record on his travel expenditure is appalling & almost legendary but it is the, as yet, unpublicised which will probably cause mayhem.
      No matter that any revelations may be of events which took place whilst Slippery was either a National or Liberal they will be all sheeted home to Gillard & cast further doubt on her judgement & suitability to be PM
      At least now with these changes no Party will be held to ransom in the House of Reps by just one non-representative, preference-dependant, irrelevant MP & that can only be good for us all.
      The same cannot be said of the Senate - but at least there are 10 Greens who, if they see fit, will stop the outrages we saw with Howard & the way he bulldozed Jamie Briggs’ ” WorkChoices”  through the Senate.

    • John A Neve says:

      03:17pm | 25/11/11

      Robert Mc,

      Just what has Peter’s alleged mis-deeds got to do with Gillard?
      Regarding “judgement”, I always thought the Speaker was elected by the parliament, are you suggesting this is incorrect?

    • Against the Man says:

      02:49pm | 25/11/11

      I cannot help but laugh at all the ALPers who think they actually are safe and Gillard has done a wonder job. Well seeing as the ALP are continuing to enrage the majority, this is looking like the asylum/seeker debacle all over again. It looks good at first but than comes the almighty crash!

    • basketofcat says:

      03:29pm | 25/11/11

      At some point Albanese and Pyne will grow weary of playing with their sock puppets!

    • Slippy Pete says:

      10:18pm | 25/11/11

      For the most part Liberals are just godawful nasty, mendacious, horrid little beasts who should have their heads knocked together. Horrible nasty people. If you wouldn’t want them next to you in the trenches, don’t vote for them!!  And yes I would have Gillard next to me, in a battle with Tory filth! We’d be blood, but not Kevin. He is a show pony and wasn’t knifed by Julia but the ‘faceless men’ and you hated him anyway so stop lying and revising history with our ‘poor Kevin’ bullshit you Liberal fucking wankers!.

    • Truedisbeliever says:

      06:10am | 26/11/11

      Mate,,,you really are seriously deluded. You really ought stop reading the trash in the Fairfax press…take a panadol and start thinking for yourself…
      Then again you might be a public servant apparatchik or member of Get Down whose job and very existence depend on Govt largesse. Good luck to you and your kind and the new ‘moving forward’ (not) of Australia…

    • Cate says:

      02:38pm | 26/11/11

      They’ve all been licking their wounds as they go along. The year isn’t over yet.  Didn’t someone say there was going to be an election before Christmas?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

tory_maguire

"If there was no Schapelle Corby there, in a Balinese prison, we'd still be doing it."...

tory_maguire

Bob Carr says releasing Indo kids convicted of people smuggling has nothing to do with Corby...

Anthony Sharwood

Off to @SkyNewsAust to explain on #sportsline why NSW will beat Qld. One reason is we're much less sooky about life. The other is...

ToryShepherd

RT @AustProtParty: Depressed Leftie @ToryShepherd laments Aussie anti-immigration sentiment, says we're haters & intolerant redneck... http://t.co/DLssoRYP

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Who murdered the Arts degree?

Who murdered the Arts degree?

Have we murdered the liberal arts education? That was the final question on Monday night’s Q&A…

Australia, you have nothing to fear but fear itself

Australia, you have nothing to fear but fear itself

Hansonism’s back – and we’re not just talking about Pauline appearing as a sometime…

Wilkie is poking around on the wrong gambling issue

Wilkie is poking around on the wrong gambling issue

Andrew Wilkie has okayed a lame version of the government’s pokies legislation, which he yesterday…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

242 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter