U2’s 360 degrees tour has touched down in Australia and is in full swing. Much like the main feature of the tour, stories have been coming from every direction on how extravagant the concert is. How the big scale, big vision, and big cost have lead to the biggest concert event ever.

So you don't like my mega-expensive over-the-top staging? Picture: Getty

You have to admit, the numbers are pretty impressive.

U2’s two year world tour has run up an $850,000 dollars daily running cost, and last year took $123 million as the highest grossing tour of 2009. ‘The claw’ stage that dominates the band as they play towers at an impressive height of 164 feet. It is so large that it took six 747 jets to get it to Australia.

It’s supported by a crew of 130 people, and relies on 55 trucks to get around the country. ‘The claw’ is such a massive structure that the car park under Etihad Stadium in Melbourne required reinforcement, and the roof couldn’t close either.

While in some ways it makes for an impressive production, it’s a bit strange that a band that is so involved in activism and an open supporter of Greenpeace touts excessive displays as this as something to be celebrated.

Carbonfootprint.com has crunched the numbers as up to 65,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide, or enough to fly the four band members to Mars - and back. To offset their two year tour of excess (and they have claimed that they will) U2 would have to plant more than 20,000 trees per year.

For a band that has been more than a bit heavy handed preaching about limiting excess and supporting charity, that’s got to sound pretty hypocritical and empty from two years beneath a giant claw on the biggest stage show ever. Offsetting that kind of wastage, while admirable, is completely different from never being wasteful in the first place.

On cost alone, it’s being touted as the end game of stadium rock. But is spending that much money really worth it? Does the fact that U2 can cram 60,000 people into standing-only venue make for a better show? How many jets does it take for us to be impressed by the number? Is it six, or will four do? Is the dollar figure really something that we will remember in later years as making the show more memorable?

There’s no doubt that U2 can still bring out a number 1 album (perhaps more of force of habit rather than anything else) but it’s pretty much a given that the 60,000 strong audience will be clambering more for their work from The Joshua Tree and Achtung Baby rather than anything from their most recent releases.

As someone who was raised on a steady, consistent diet of U2’s musical offerings, I struggle to name a single song past their 1993 ‘hit single’ Lemon.

If U2 really wanted to practice what they preached, it would maybe be more impressive if they had a minimalist show on a stage in the middle of a large crowd. If people are going to see U2, they’ll see them whether there’s a stadium spectacular, or four guys on a stage in the middle of a stadium, still essentially delivering the same 360 degrees experience.

I’m sure there’s no one out there who felt more inclined to buy tickets to a U2 concert simply based on the impressive nature of the stage the band are playing on. Dare I say it… isn’t it the music that should matter?

Matt’s blog: End of the Spectrum

122 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      04:58am | 02/12/10

      It’s not just U2. Almost all the most prominent global warming activists live in large houses (often more than just one), fly extensively in private jets, and drive big gas guzzling cars.

      Al Gore, for example, lives in a house that consumes 20 times as much electricity as a normal American family, and owns two others on the waterfront.

      As Glenn Reynolds says, “I’ll believe there’s a crisis when the people telling me there’s a crisis start acting like there’s a crisis”. Do the Bonos and Gores really believe what they preach?

    • Tom says:

      07:32am | 02/12/10

      Good observation Eric. Bono, Sting, Gore, Geldorf become cult figures because of their material successes. They are followed around by a fawning group of hangers on who wait on their every utterance and pronounce it infallible. The followers enjoy having their messiahs and the whole thing becomes a major exercise in mob-driven group-think.

      Hollywood produces the same odious group of sanctimonious w###kers. They always attract enough flatterers to protect them against the truth. I suggest that this is a human condition.

    • TChong says:

      08:12am | 02/12/10

      Tom- a bit harsh to lob Geldorf in that group.
      Sir Bob seemed to actually try to do something with “We are the world” concerts etc.
      The bloated circus that has grown around, what was originally, a pretty decent idea of at least attempting to do something.

    • Alex says:

      09:40am | 02/12/10

      The Greenists are similar to the Communists of yesteryear - all comfortably well off, trying to save the world and “educating” the great unwashed.  I am getting wary of this coercive utopianism.

    • Steely Dan says:

      10:51am | 02/12/10

      @ Eric

      “Do the Bonos and Gores really believe what they preach?”
      U2 are purchasing carbon offsets for the tour.  Matt Smith seems to be convinced they won’t stick to their word, though I guess ‘U2 might lie and refuse to practice what they preach’ isn’t a catchy title… So for Bono I guess the answer is ‘yes’.

      And Eric, isn’t the low quality of U2’s recent albums because the feminists are oppressing them?

    • Sentient Being says:

      12:02pm | 02/12/10

      @Steely Dan
      Wow! That was a good one. You’re up there with Monty Python today!

    • Alyssa KT says:

      11:03am | 03/12/10

      @ Steely Dan - he didn’t say he didn’t believe they would buy the carbon offsets - he said the planet would be better off if the damage wasn’t done in the first place.
      Carbon offsets are a bogan idea anyway. Just an excuse to not take any responsibility in the here and now.

    • Steely Dan says:

      01:06pm | 03/12/10

      @ Alyssa

      “he didn’t say he didn’t believe they would buy the carbon offsets - he said the planet would be better off if the damage wasn’t done in the first place.”
      As long as the offsets aren’t provided by a dodgy dealer, the planet will be exactly the same as it was before the tour - except that thousands and thousands of people will see a show, and a bunch of people will get employed.

      “Carbon offsets are a bogan idea anyway. Just an excuse to not take any responsibility in the here and now.”
      Paying the $ for the offsets isn’t taking on the responsibility?

    • Against the Man says:

      05:51am | 02/12/10

      I’ve lost a lot of respect for Bono after seeing him standing next to Gillard and Keneally. Doesn’t he know people will judge him based on the company he keeps and being seen with those losers isn’t good for his image.

    • Rosie says:

      12:42pm | 02/12/10

      Wow you beat me to it! Bono lost it all when everytime he appeared on TV for the good cause, Julia Gillard was by his side trying to promote her own agenda. Doesn’t these people realize how off putting it is when someone that seems not to show any passion for the cause is only there to promote an image. It is a wonder the Governor General wasn’t there to help Gillard & Keneally promote the Labor brand.

    • Ask a stupid question says:

      01:57pm | 02/12/10

      Why wasn’t he standing next to Abbott and O’Farrell ? Oh ... wait.

    • Against the Man says:

      04:43pm | 03/12/10

      Right on AASQ, I mean as PM Gillard is…...........oh wait her party didn’t win a majority, guess fake PM is better than no PM smile

    • Ask a stupid question says:

      06:21pm | 03/12/10

      So if the Prime Minister were a loser, what would that make Tony Abbott ?

    • steve parker says:

      05:57am | 02/12/10

      Completely agree! I believe U2, and Bono in particular, are displaying a strange kind of double standard as flagbearers for poverty reduction and oppression while wallowing in the excess of pop stardom and snouts in the trough. It doesn’t quite ring true and for me, and never will.

    • yilgahn says:

      02:37pm | 02/12/10

      I beleive the Irish changed their tax laws a few years back and suddenly U2 were no longer living in a veritable tax haven.

      U2 Inc packed up and left the country the next day for warmer climes.

      Very publicly minded

    • thatmosis says:

      06:10am | 02/12/10

      The man is a hypocrite of the first order. Waffles on about saving the world and each show he stages releases as much CO2 into the atmosphere as a small city with 5 x 747’s and 55 semi’s plus the power to run the show. People and Governments fawn over this bloke as though he’s the second coming when all he is is a mediocre singer at best with an inflated ego who uses his pulling power to increase his own wealth. The mans a legend in his own lunchtime and I wouldnt believe a word he says. It just shows the mentallity of those who try to use his presence to bolster their own standing in the community, sad, sad people all.

    • Jacob says:

      08:55am | 02/12/10

      I love how bloggers are always world authorities on musical excellence (and every other issue known to mankind).

      I am not a fan of U2, but to describe Bono as a ‘mediocre singer’???

      How’s your singing career going thatmosis?

    • Macca says:

      09:28am | 02/12/10

      @Jacob, anyone with a bit of music training listening to Bono live would realise he is an average singer. That doesn’t distract from the success of his music, and probably doesn’t make his concerts any less enjoyable.

      The only two artists I can think of that I have seen live whose vocals were really impressive were Rob Thomas (when he was part of Matchbox, not solo) and Michael Buble.

    • Merispod says:

      10:00am | 02/12/10

      @Jacob   Bono is an awful singer but his pop group have some good catchy tunes only let down by juvenile lyrics.

    • Jacob says:

      11:43am | 02/12/10

      I rest my case!!!!

    • Horthy says:

      12:25pm | 02/12/10

      Bono Vox my left potato!

    • Henrietta says:

      03:20pm | 04/12/10

      @thatmosis

      Agree wholeheartedly!....and I really don’t know what all the fuss is about their music

    • Jason says:

      08:43pm | 04/12/10

      Put Bono next to Eddie Vedder on stage and that superstar sheen would fade pretty fast.  The band is great, they have written some great songs (in the past, when they believed in something more than money), but Bono’s voice isn’t something that takes you to another place.

    • Legend says:

      08:55pm | 29/06/11

      when has bono done all this waffleing about saving the world..? do u mean world hunger ... dont know if you getting him confused with someone else like bill gates..? maybe you just dont like him.. i never him so cant judge him as much as you .. all these bloody rich stars are all the same though arent they

    • K says:

      06:38am | 02/12/10

      I can’t name a song past Vertigo (2002?) U2 rely on older hits to pull fans to their shows.

      While gimmicks are great, the stage would make for a great experience. smaller, more intimate shows would be better. U2 are (or shouldn’t) be around for much longer.

    • Steely Dan says:

      10:54am | 02/12/10

      @ K

      “I can’t name a song past Vertigo (2002?) U2 rely on older hits to pull fans to their shows.”
      The Rolling Stones are pulling the same scam.  Hacks, the lot of them.  Wouldn’t go to a concert if you paid me.

    • Mattact says:

      03:18pm | 05/12/10

      @Steely Dan

      ‘The Rolling Stones are pulling the same scam’.....what crap. The Stones don’t pretend to be anything else than what they are….ie. old rockers playing the same old hits that the paying public continues to want to hear. They don’t pretend to be world savers like U2/Bono.

    • Graham The Great says:

      06:48am | 02/12/10

      It all about money, hey give me a couple hundred million and I’ll tout any cause you want!  They pick a ‘popular’ cause, if it works then that’s what they use to drag the punters in!

    • Hermano says:

      06:59am | 02/12/10

      Clambering?  I do not think it means what you think it means.

    • TChong says:

      07:00am | 02/12/10

      “This is not a war song”  (Sunday,Bloody Sunday) - a sellout even way back then, mid 1980s.

    • Geoff says:

      10:37am | 02/12/10

      Sorry TChong it’s “This is not a rebel song. This song is Sunday, Bloody Sunday.” Under A Blood Red Sky - 1984.

    • Jill says:

      07:01am | 02/12/10

      Oh how I agree!! These mega stars are all the same…jetting all over the world making people aware of the environment. I think John Howard’s finest moment was when he refused an ‘audience’ with Bono, saying he didn’t have time to talk to has-been Irish rock stars (or words to that effect). Bono is a fat little wanker, and an uber hypocritical one at that!!

    • Scarlett Street Rocker says:

      12:14pm | 02/12/10

      Be the hokey! Will yiz leave the little fella alone. Sure he’s only tryin’ to show yiz ‘the truth” with 3 chords, a red guitar and no strings!

    • Ab says:

      07:10am | 02/12/10

      A large stage show put on by a huge hypocrite and his band of has beens that impresses people who like shiny things.

    • Dave says:

      07:21am | 02/12/10

      As long as he doesnt try to get everyone to text again. I paid a fortune for my tickets, so i’m sure with the money he’s grossing from the Dad Rock Tour, he can chip in for all of us.

    • grumpy old man says:

      07:32am | 02/12/10

      U2 is a profit making business, and will do whatever they need to do to achieve a profit. Anyone silly enough to fall for their ’ holier than thou ‘preaching is simply a victim of their marketing.

    • Retired Soldier says:

      07:34am | 02/12/10

      thatmosis says:06:10am | 02/12/10
      How can anyone argue against what “thatmosis” has stated. You have said it all and there is nothing to add. Well done !

    • KH says:

      07:54am | 02/12/10

      Now now people - fair shake of the sauce bottle….....Bono and U2 have always taken up causes - a lot of their early stuff was a commentary on some event that was important to them - Irish conflicts right up to Sarajevo - so I don’t think he/they are entirely full of hot air…......

      Having said that, this show tells me they aren’t practising what they preach - if you are going to crack on about carbon emissions, you probably shouldn’t be personally responsible for a big portion of them….......

    • Elphaba says:

      07:56am | 02/12/10

      Yeah, this isn’t news.  Of course they are.  I’m still going to see them though.  I like music.  So long as he doesn’t get too preachy, I’m thinking it’ll be a good $40 spent. grin

    • DH says:

      08:16am | 02/12/10

      Muse are better

    • Kate says:

      03:13pm | 02/12/10

      You’re right, but that’s like saying a chocolate ice-cream is better than a turd sandwich. It’s just obvious.

    • DH says:

      04:54pm | 02/12/10

      Only to those with all their senses intact, Kate. Some on here might just see brown mush, without taking the time to smell or taste the musical goodness.

      In other news, Muse are also bringing their biggest gig set-up to Australia this week. I’d be interested in finding out just how many planes they require for their stage. Not that it’ll stop me going and enjoying the hell out of it. But I’d be curious. Can they out-offset U2? Over to you, Matt…

    • shane says:

      08:16am | 02/12/10

      Guess what!!!! No one practices what they preach!! How many people do you think listen to U2 because of Bono’s interest in issues??

    • Jill says:

      02:09pm | 02/12/10

      .....not many - but they’re going to get preached at anyway…..

    • Legend says:

      09:02pm | 29/06/11

      been a fan of u2 since mid 80s. Im only interested in the music and how it has helped me cope with lifes difficult moments, inspired me to take up guitar. I cant save the world- I can only save mine. If bono wants to influence others to do certain things thats up to him. He wont stop me from using my car, flying off to new york ..and I wont judge them. they employ hundreds and pay far more tax than 10 yrs ago. If people criticise someone like this is seems like jealousy to me..

    • Steve Smith says:

      08:35am | 02/12/10

      When it comes down to it, everyone puts money of the environment. U2 just do it on a larger scale. Are they to blame for the million people obviously forced to their shows? The answer is yes.

      Besides, isn’t Bono also about saving the starving in Africa? You know what I heard? The bloke eats breakfast lunch AND dinner, everyday.. what a hypocrite!!!

    • Geoff says:

      08:43am | 02/12/10

      We need to take bets on what topics he will bring up and in what order. As it is almost certian he will preach. I believe he will start with global warming before moving to indigenous issues and end the set with Africa.

    • Seanr says:

      08:58am | 02/12/10

      I agree on all points, U2 and Bono in particular are huge hypocrites both with their carbon footprint and their move out of Ireland for tax purposes.

      My favourite U2 album is still The Joshua Tree.

    • Anne Ti says:

      09:01am | 02/12/10

      Lets face it without all the bells and whistles U2 would have to rely on raw talent…and that just isn’t worth paying for. So essentially they NEED to kill the planet to survive, because much like everyone else…the dollar is more important.

    • Wilma J Craig says:

      09:04am | 02/12/10

      Like all so-called celebrities who claim to promote any issue whatsoever U2 is every bit as false as the others. Does anyone actually check up on these people after the event? Where is the proof that they are counteracting their greedy, selfish misuse of finite fuels, the “carbon footprint” they are ordering us to reduce?
      Or is it all just talk, talk, talk???
      Are they actually any good? Or is it all the hype surrounding them.

    • Keith Richards says:

      09:06am | 02/12/10

      Firstly, please accept my apologies for wasting electricity by using this computer to post this comment. I know I really should turn off this and all other devices, and crawl into a dark cave forever.

      It’s rock and roll. Entertainment.

      Would you prefer that we cancel all concerts ? Grow up, you sanctimonious hypocrites.

    • Rossco says:

      09:14am | 02/12/10

      Bono is a self righteous wanker. Someone should tell him he doesn’t need to wear sunglasses indoors and at night.

    • Rob says:

      11:39am | 02/12/10

      Corey Hart?

    • John Dark says:

      02:31pm | 02/12/10

      I see what you did there Rob. Well played.

    • Anne71 says:

      08:19am | 03/12/10

      “I wear my sunglasses at night so I can so I can…”

      Well done, Rossco! I’m going to have to listen to that one now.

    • daftpunkcoffee says:

      09:20am | 02/12/10

      I dislike the music of U2 and always have, and Bono, yes a wanker.

      However in this case wouldn’t you agree that the end might justify the means?
      These days a small stage show would be crucified, even more so if he came out and said that his small stage show was to help poverty/Co2 ect ect.

      Bono has done and will continue to do more to help important causes than the average rockstar or even average person.
      Personal responsibility rests squarely on the individual and in this case i believe that U2 can have the same size show as any other stage show.

      This end justifies the means. Only just tho.

    • Bruce says:

      07:31pm | 02/12/10

      daft: Agree: I think Bono means well, but unfortunately comes accross as a “little”  wanker. As for their music, only liked their version of the Beatles Helter Skelter. A very adequate version !

    • Battler says:

      09:24am | 02/12/10

      I love U2 they are a great band. But Bono telling me I need to do more the help the third world and cut my carbon, I resent. When I can afford to keep my family comfortable and pay my electricity bill, my mortgage, my water rates, my countil rates, my phone bill, my grocery costs, my insurances, my health insurance my taxes and perhaps tkae the family on a holiday to rest and recouperate, then I will try and solve the worls problems. Millionaires telling me I need to do all this makes me furious because they DON’T live the simple daily life we all do, donating a few million to charity is not a big deal event donating $20 to a red cross relief effort is something I have to think about.

    • Shaking Head says:

      09:25am | 02/12/10

      U2 were always Irish politics for the simple minded.  Bono is a man a principles, a tax exile refusing to pay fair taxes in the country that made him a success.  An environmental warrior preaching us to use less while arranging the consumptive excessive concerts.  Bleating about how unfair life is for many from his lavish castles.  I look forward to his extravagant celebrity dinner event to highlight the starving…..... and people fall for this stuff, good grief.

    • Dave says:

      09:26am | 02/12/10

      I don’t think I can recall Bono bang on about global warming?

      I’ve heard him talk about starvation, Aids and people dying…..yes….but not global warming.

    • Ryan says:

      04:19pm | 02/12/10

      @Dave: and yet he is still a millionaire, living it up lush as.. Oh I get it he wants us to give them OUR money, NOT HIS.
      He can come and preach when he has the same debts as the average Australian including a big ole mortgage, has to live under the tyranny of this Labor governments excessive utilities, food and interest rates.

    • FanFullStop says:

      09:38am | 02/12/10

      Whilst making no assumptions about the amount of money or time the man/ collective band might donate (tax deductable?) to thier said causes, I CAN assume that very few pseudo politically aware individuals might have intellectually dined off the awareness people like Bono, Geldof et al bring to the unfortunate lives of so many poor poor people who will never get to go to a U2 concert.

    • Drew(Darlinghurst) says:

      09:45am | 02/12/10

      Bono is also a Champion for combating HIV/AIDS. This he has done well.

      I hope you all bought a RED RIBBON yesterday for WORLD AIDS DAY.

      Thank You Bono and others in the fight against HIV/AIDS.

    • Drew(Darlinghurst) says:

      09:45am | 02/12/10

      Bono is also a Champion for combating HIV/AIDS. This he has done well.

      I hope you all bought a RED RIBBON yesterday for WORLD AIDS DAY.

      Thank You Bono and others in the fight against HIV/AIDS.

    • Dr Platon Zeindt says:

      09:49am | 02/12/10

      Carbon is not a pollutant.  Call me crazy but all organic life is carbon based.
      This whole carbon footprint is a distraction from the real problem. Not enough good concerts. U2s concert was fine. Good effort. U2 are not activists. Activism for the most part makes people feel that they are important when they are not. When they finish they go home and watch crap on their big tv’s. Trust me I have been to University including Harvard and many many other fine stablishments. It is by far the most retarded and useless that involve themselves in activism, which ultimately achieves nothing. For all those free-loading bludgers get a job (perhaps a shower) and even a haircut and stop tattooing yourselves, we real people (have jobs save lives every day) don’t like it. we think you are useless because you are useless. We don’t believe in affirmative action because affirmation won’t save me when my heart is sick, but a good surgeon, a gym membership and good diet may extend my life. Trust me I know, have done community work, have set up hospitals in the third world, have worked in crisis centres. I have employed people, run businesses and many many other things that required a lot of hard work and long days and no thanks. Youth want fame and approval, U@ being hypocrites is simply playing to their audience of cheap, slack, who cares generation of tweets (I know how to spell). Is the world better, only in developing economies. We have more technified and dumber people this year than last year. Let us keep up the bad work. To U2 I take off my hat. You know your audience and you play to them. You are business people. Good for you

    • Steely Dan says:

      11:37am | 02/12/10

      @ Dr Platon Zeindt

      “Carbon is not a pollutant.  Call me crazy but all organic life is carbon based.”
      Water’s not a pollutant either.  But like carbon, you can have too much of it.

    • Sam says:

      09:52am | 02/12/10

      People either love U2/Bono or hate them, and I’m in the love category. I agree with the article in that most people at the concert will probably want to hear older songs, that’s always the case with a major act that is near the end of their career (or if this was the Rolling Stones I guess it would mid-career!). I don’t really care much for Bono’s preaching, it annoys me, but it doesn’t mean I dislike U2, they are my favourite band of all time and I love their huge spectacle concerts. How boring would the world be if everyone just played on a small stage? Not many musical acts can pull crowds this big, and not many acts can still release top quality albums 30 years into their career. Maybe the fact the writer can’t remember the name of a U2 hit since 1993 is because when you get older you kind of don’t care anymore what a song is called, whereas when you’re young it’s all you care about. Never heard of Beautiful Day or Vertigo? Bono/U2 is easy to hate, this article was a lazy cheap shot and the writer obviously had nothing better to write about! I guess any publicity is good publicity though!

    • Stephen Putnam says:

      08:40pm | 02/12/10

      I first saw U2 way back in ‘79 as the first band on the bill for Talking Heads at The Electric Ballroom in North London.(What a venue!) They were called in at the last moment to replace Human League, who were in their early experimental phase. They had wanted to film a set and mingle with the crowd while they watched themselves as a the curtain raiser. Talking Heads didn’t like the idea at all and as a result Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark were moved up one with U2 brought in to kick things off.
      They were pretty basic in those days sounding very much the three chord punk band. I met Bono after the gig handing out Christian pamphlets in the street and explaining the band’s mission statement (for want of a better way of putting it). Then as now they had an agenda which went well beyond being superstars.
      When Talking Heads toured the UK in 1980 they had U2 as their curtain-raiser at the Hammersmith Palais. By they had attained their mature sound with The Edge’s echoing guitar very much to the fore.The following year they had their first big hit (Gloria) and the rest, as they say in the classics, is history.

    • Star Struck says:

      09:56am | 02/12/10

      Remember when Geldof introduced Bono at one of the Live8 concerts - To the gentle sound of Larry tapping a slow, low beat, Bono approached the mike & humbly addressed the hushed crowd: “Do you know that every time I take a breath, a child somewhere in the world dies, ‘cos of poverty?” The silence was broken as a wise man in the crowd retorted: “Well hold yer breath then, why don’t ya!”

    • Steely Dan says:

      10:46am | 02/12/10

      @ Star Struck

      “Remember when Geldof introduced Bono at one of the Live8 concerts…”
      No, but I remember that time when a horse walked into that bar and the barman asked ‘why the long face?’
      http://www.snopes.com/music/artists/bono.asp

    • Star Struck says:

      11:24am | 02/12/10

      Steely Dan, I can’t believe that you looked this up on snopes. Did anyone ever believe this was anything other than a joke? Next you’ll be exposing the myth about the talking duck who couldn’t understand why he’d been offered a job in the circus, (”...WTF do they want with a plasterer?”). Anyway back to the hypocrisy of our attention seeking celebrities…

    • Steely Dan says:

      12:45pm | 02/12/10

      @ Star Struck

      I didn’t need to look it up, I just wanted a source to link to!  Glad to see you didn’t buy it either, but ‘there’s a sucker born every minute’...

    • Happy Hypocrite. says:

      10:09am | 02/12/10

      It seems fashionable to attack anyone willing to step forward for a cause and brand them a hypocrite.  Take me, for example.

      I subscribe to a charity that supports children in poverty, while my own brood are comfortably clothed, fed and educated.
      I grow a vege patch to recycle our grey water, compost our waste and reduce our carbon footprint, but I also drive my car to the supermarket to buy prepackaged products and eat out on occasion.
      I give our surplus items away to those who need them,  yet I also shop for new things for my family needs.
      I choose energy efficient appliances and sustainable products to service my large suburban home.

      Good on you Bono.  I am committed to improving my environmental credentials where I see an opportunity to do so.  I only wish there were more environmental “hypocrites” like me and fewer critical, self righteous cynics.

    • jf says:

      01:15pm | 02/12/10

      There is a vast difference between the self indulgence of such gross unecessary carbon output as this verus feeding your children.

      As to the self-indulgence of your vege patch, you are a not only a hypocrite but a stupid hypocrite. If you genuinely cared about reducing your carbon footprint (rather than just improving your “environmental credentials”  you would source your veges from a farm where each lettuce leaf, each carrot and each bean is produced with vastly less impact on the enironment than each lettuce leaf, each carrot and each bean in your wasteful, grossly carbon emitting vege patch.

      As for your large suburban home - why? If you were fair dinkum, you’d live in high-density accomodation.

      It is the self righteous than indulge in self indulgent, self promoting past times that have very little practical impact on their own comforts and lifestyles.

      Rich socialists are the worst of the worst. Expecting everyone else to make genuine sacrifices whilst living indulgent, consumer lifestyles.

      Your navel gazing, self-important piece has only highlighted the hypocrisy in the article, not rebutted it.

      But your own phrase says it all - you are only interested in improving your own image (your credentials). Much like Bono.

    • Kate says:

      03:21pm | 02/12/10

      Yes, it’s great that you do all that. But what people tend to resent is when someone does a few good things, and then goes out of their way to endlessly brag about it and make other people feel like crap for not going to the same extent.

      Bono has developed the image of a whiny pain in the arse who can’t do one good deed without ringing 45 different media outlets to inform them of just how awesome he is. That’s why people don’t like him.

    • Happy Hypocrite says:

      05:39pm | 02/12/10

      I did not intend to rebut, instead make the point that we are all hypocrites to some degree,  no matter our conscientious actions or good intentions. Would you propose to have us all return to subsistence economies or nomadic tribes?  You do however, help make my point that attacking those attempting to do better is a cheap and easy shot.

    • jf says:

      07:30am | 03/12/10

      But my point HH is that you are not trying to do better. You are happily part of the problem whilst yelling from the rooftops “fix the problem plebs”. And even worse, through tokenistic, usually pointless, gestures you place yourself on a pedestal for general acclaim and songs of praise.

      Not one thing you do, in the name of the environment, involves sacrifice on your part (and in fact some of the gestures are more damaging then not doing them – vege patch).

      You are the person screeching for carbon pricing, whilst gobbling it up every night in front of your ludicrously large flat-screen in our massively carbon gobbling home. The same carbon pricing that will have almost nil practical impact on your life and yet have a dramatic impact on the lives of those for whom a small increase in the price of electricity will mean the difference between school camp for their kids or not.

      As for attacking ‘those attempting to do better” well doesn’t that just sum up the smugness. You’re not trying to do better. You are trying simply a middle-class, suburban trendy. Jumping on the latest fad and making a big person of yourself.

      You are worse than those that don’t believe in man-made global warming. At least they have a conviction and are there to be convinced.

      And as to us all being hypocrites, sure, but at least most of us endeavour not to be and don’t see it as a virtue.

      Not only are you a stupid hypocrite. You are a smug, stupid hypocrite.

    • Sara says:

      10:13am | 02/12/10

      Gosh, so much care and so little responsibility.  I work in an environmental agency,  I am all up for reducing footprint.  In fact, that is what I work for. 

      When all of you engage one on one, the Prime Minister, the President of the US, Nelson Mandela, the Delai Lama, stand up for Work Aids Day, perform at Live Aid, run a campaign with Senior Economists in the US Government to get funding for drugs for people in Africa and entertain millions of people you can decide whether Bono hits the spot.  The man never tried or pretended to be perfect.  He always said that U2 are first a rock group.  Be grateful that people who are so successful try to do something positive.

      And you wonder why mainstream Australia doesn’t get on board…Hmmm, I wonder.

    • jf says:

      01:21pm | 02/12/10

      U2 are a pretty mainstream band and yet “mainstream Australia doesn’t get on board”.

      It seems to me that Bono may not be achieving to much after all.

    • DH says:

      03:33pm | 02/12/10

      Sara, while its great Bono can usually found to be doing something positive (unlike a lot of musicians these days), I think the point is: can he not do it on a slightly smaller stage?

    • Peter says:

      10:16am | 02/12/10

      i haven’t been an avid concert goer as i am unashamedly a fan of “studio” produced music. I went to the Lemon concert at the MCG some years back, great as it was, it just wasn’t load enough and i was pretty close to the action.

      Crowded House is the best live band i have seen..

    • Peter says:

      10:56am | 02/12/10

      I meant ‘loud” as opposed to load. I have to watch my langauge on this thing..

    • Samson says:

      10:22am | 02/12/10

      I was looking at youtube videos a few days ago and found an old clip of U2 covering the Beatles’ helter skelter.  It was pretty good.  This surprised me, as I was unaware that Bono was actually cool once upon a time.

    • Dave says:

      11:37am | 02/12/10

      it was the first song on Rattle and Hum

    • phil says:

      10:40am | 02/12/10

      At a cost of $850k per day and bringing in $123m for the year is it just me or is Bono making a serious loss on this tour?

    • Lemon says:

      05:40pm | 02/12/10

      Phil,

      Yep saw that as well - $850K per day =  $310M.

      Taking $123M. Ouch

      I will give the author the benefit of the doubt and blame a typo.

    • Steely Dan says:

      10:41am | 02/12/10

      @ Matt Smith

      “To offset their two year tour of excess (and they have claimed that they will) U2 would have to plant more than 20,000 trees per year.”
      Seems odd that you’d refute your own argument midway through the piece.  Or are you saying that they won’t do it?

    • JRM says:

      10:49am | 02/12/10

      Its called entertainment.  I listen to and watch U2 for the show. The bigger the better.

      Couldn’t really care less about his beliefs. What makes him an expert on anything other than rock music and singing.

    • james says:

      11:02am | 02/12/10

      pffft. we don’t need your cynicism - it kills the fun, the music, and it doesn’t help the carbon footprint or the HIV/Aids epidemic.
      Try going carbon neutral, or tirelessly promoting charitable causes Matt, you just can’t.
      Journalists!!

    • me says:

      04:07pm | 02/12/10

      spot on james

    • Millsy says:

      11:11am | 02/12/10

      Quick….get this pointless blog to U2 immediately. Surely they’ll cancel the stadium tour & instead play at corner pubs with their amps on milkcrates

    • Craig says:

      11:44am | 02/12/10

      When has Bono banged on about carbon footprints? 

      What’s the hypocrisy between staging an extravaganza and promoting charity?  Can they not co-exist?

      Am I not outraged enough yet?  Am I not thinking of the children?  Won’t somebody think of the children?!?

    • Condoseres says:

      11:50am | 02/12/10

      The global scale issues such as HIV and poverty that Bono champions (and for some reason he gets criticised for this) are worth making a loud nosie over. Furthermore, such is the scale of these issues, that if U2 donated every cent raised from the 360 world tour they would hardly make a dent. What is needed, as Bono and others have frequently pointed out, is systematic change in the West’s attitude to the solution. To place human needs/lives above our own comfort/prosperity.

      But what would be the best way to call attention to this?

      I know, how about the biggest, most spectacular freaking rock show ever staged? U2 tours have always been about more than just playing music. They famously use the full set of resources available to them to drive home a point. And judging by the fact that you (and now I) have bothered to spend time writing about it, it’s working.

      It’s true that calling for an end to poverty by staging an extravagent rock show seems a little hypocritical on the surface of it, and in interviews I’ve watched Bono is happy to admit that. But that doesn’t invalidate the point he is making, which is that we need to be making noise about global humanitarian issues.

      So I say full marks to the U2 team. You go and make the biggest noise you can. I’ll be there in Brisbane, making some noise with you.

    • BT says:

      12:58pm | 02/12/10

      Agree. What world leader is going to meet with some muso strumming his guitar in some little pub in Ireland? Bono’s campaigns are heard only because he maintains his status as a mega celebrity - that’s the ticket to gaining access to those in the top seats. It also means the message he broadcasts remains current. I am a massive fan, have been for 20 years. My only criticism of Bono is not that he campaigns for these issues, but that the issues he raises are not well communicated. People don’t want to be told they should give money to a cause when they don’t have a lot of cash themselves. They also don’t see why they should give money when it is world leaders who make the decisions that cause poverty in the first place, the poverty that keeps us in the west living so nicely in comparison to those in the third world. Bono should campaign against the World Bank, IMF and others, then people might support his cause more.

    • majid says:

      11:57am | 02/12/10

      The ego grows only bigger but never goes smaller… Next year, U2 will use the A380 to get to Australia… By the way, it’s a long time ago that I stopped believing in the sincerity of these pseudo/good/cause preachers, who at the end of day are only about making money, polishing their stature and satisfying their unmeasurable ego…

    • Cate P says:

      01:28pm | 02/12/10

      oh well ,maybe the engines will fall off.  OMG is he wearing leather clothes?  Cruel on so many levels.

    • majid says:

      07:06pm | 02/12/10

      I hope the A380 will be much safer in 2011, Cate… Because we want Bono to come back and stay at the Versace with his entire family (As he did 2 years ago) because the Gold Coast Tourism need his money to survive… Especially since the Japanese tourists are not anymore opting for the GOLD COAST as a holiday destination(Too expensive and very much red neck)!!! I think if I was his PR, I will certainly add this to his CV: Wherever Bono goes, tourism flourish…

    • Dave says:

      11:58am | 02/12/10

      To quote Bono

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/davos08/2008/01/bono_and_gore_have_an_answer_n.html
      . “If you were to say: 10 million kids are going to die because of climate change, you’d read about this. Well, they are going to die next year, because of extreme poverty.”

      “Going cold turkey on carbon emissions is actually a bit dangerous.”

      “I do remember the unemployment in Ireland in the 1970s. Throwing away the prosperity that we are enjoying is more dangerous than we think.”

    • frank says:

      11:58am | 02/12/10

      haters gunna hate.

    • Bryan says:

      12:40pm | 02/12/10

      All the way from Bono’s sunglasses to U2’s tax schemes through to the hypocrisy on social issues (AIDS, homelessness, youth suicide, world poverty, deforestation, carbon emissions etc) that so many in the media, politics and the entertainment industry seem to grasp with both hands and shout from everywhere in every country possible. Just as long as it brings them publicity, money and popularity but does not in any way interfere with their lifestyles and the levels of comfort that they have grown so accustomed to and in most cases demand.

      These guys along with the likes of Gore, Blanchett, Oprah etc are case in point and wholly indicative of how spin, bull dust sweet talk and a great PR machine can get you whatever you want in a - do is I say not as I do - world!

    • Sam Chowder says:

      01:05pm | 02/12/10

      Surely everyone realises Bonos concerns and campaigning is just promotion to sell product ..... you didn’t?  well I’m sorry to also inform you that Santa doesn’t really deliver the prezzies.

    • Will says:

      01:57pm | 02/12/10

      This a petty and ridiculous article and you would suspect and hope that the author realises it. Hypocrisy can be found anywhere if you look hard enough. U2 are first and foremost entertainers so they can do what they want on stage. Outside of time spent as performers, U2 probably practice what they preach and then some.

    • DH says:

      02:36pm | 02/12/10

      Petty? I actually like the premise. U2 aside, if you promise to offset your carbon footprint, does that mean you can go all out to make your footprint as big as possible?

      Also, how exactly does one offset a carbon footprint? Is it really just about planting trees, or do we have to go see the climate priest who we’ll pay to tell us he’s relieved us of our carbon sins, without actually being able to prove it either way?

    • Lemon says:

      03:57pm | 02/12/10

      U2 are awesome, and whilst I can see the point of this article, it is indicative of what has happened to music and bands in the last 5-10 years.

      Albums don’t sell, in shops any more and hardly online either. the bands have to tour to make money and show creative talent. (althought I have always thought U2 - Vertigo, was a ripoff of “Get Free"by the Vines)

      As an aside I nearly puked when I saw the picture of “Greatest Moral Challenge” old Rudd the “Sauce bottle himself” with his arm around Bono last week in the paper.

    • Martin G says:

      04:06pm | 02/12/10

      Albums don’t sell here because Australian music shops are blatant ripoff merchants.

      Albums also don’t sell because record companies are too busy trying to push talentless garbage like the ‘artist’ in the article.

    • Lemon says:

      05:11pm | 02/12/10

      Martin,

      I do agree that Music shops are a ripoff. Also its a very vicious circle for the musician and bands.

      The large retailers can’t sell the CD Format music, because no one wants to buy it, so therefore don’t dedicate the shelf space for the Music anymore, therefore the majority of bands don’t get to advertise on the shelf or sell their music in the shops anymore. Thus the vicious circle.

      Its full of DVD’s - old format and now the new and improved Blu Ray. So we can “rebuy” the Predator movie series etc and all the old fav’s all over again, again !!!. (and probably again, again when they bring out the next format”).

      Also probably agree that the record companies not signing anywhere near as much new talent as they should but they are truly struggling with how to make money out of anyone !!.

      Look at the “Artic Monkey’s’ for instance, no record company orginally, made it on “You Tube” and social networks. The record companies and retailers are really struggling here with this concept.

      I do like to read Drum media etc, Spin.com, nme.com and others as they will give the indie bands a good opportuniity

      Personally do like U2 - but have other favourites as well. Have a listen to Titus Andronicus - That Rocks !!!

    • Dave says:

      04:04pm | 02/12/10

      I don’t think it’s just about Bono’s (or the Band’s) personal contributions to charity. Bono’s name means “Good Voice” (Latin) and this is what he is. He influences government policy all over the world by talking to world leaders and heads of state and convincing them to spend more money (and more importantly to pay more attention) to humanitarian issues. So what if he earns mega-bucks. He wouldn’t be in a position of influence if it wern’t for his musical success. In my opinion, if that were the case, the world would be a much worse off place.

    • simon says:

      04:11pm | 02/12/10

      I think alot of the logic here is flawed in that you have to consider the overall contribution and compare it against the overall damage to the evnironment. If you consider Bono and U2’s contribution to world poverty, aids, debt, environment, oppression of freedom etc etc and compare it to the carbon footprint of all of his tours, including this one, he has had a net postiive influence.

    • jane wallace says:

      04:38pm | 02/12/10

      neither is anyone else.
      that phenomenon is calle politics.

    • jane wallace says:

      04:40pm | 02/12/10

      IS U2 a church group? a major political party? or the IMF?

    • What have I learned from this? says:

      05:20pm | 02/12/10

      It appears people that like U2 say awesome

    • unknownsoldier says:

      06:15pm | 02/12/10

      Well .... I am following Bono’s example. I and my whole family (5)are flying into Brisbane next Tuesday from OS’s. We are renting the largest SUV that Avis has in their inventory and we are staying in a top notch high rise at the Gold Coast. I got $300 tickets and I can’t wait to do my bit for climate change. It is guys like Bono and me that keep this world in a cosy blanket of warmth. I will plant a gum tree while I am downunder for all you tree hugging thong wearing pot smokers.

    • Paul says:

      08:51pm | 02/12/10

      When im as rich as Bono then ill help the starving kiddies and save the planet. Maybe thats what everyone is doing and why nothing gets done..

    • stephen says:

      09:28pm | 02/12/10

      I got a feeling that at 9.06 am we really got a call from Keith Richards.

    • Aaron says:

      10:29pm | 02/12/10

      HAHAHA!!! How many commenters can’t get out of their seats because they’ve been jammed in by an excess in skittle packs!? You forget that first and foremost, Bono is a rock star, not a missionary, not a minister, not a government official! His job is to make music and tour around the world, now he chooses to use some of his fame and fortune to help raise awareness about global issues, but if he doesn’t send himself broke doing so, all of a sudden, he’s a hypocritical criminal. Get off your asses and just think that if you were in his position, would you be bothered doing anything? A lot of people wouldn’t, when was the last time one of these hiphop stars (All their music is exactly the same, same beat, same timing, same themes in the songs, absolute garbage) did anything with their millions? They don’t, they sit on their floating bars in the middle of their olympic sized swimming pools which they heat using their own personal coal fired power station! Yet nobody kicks up a fuss about them? Let the man do his job, and if he wants to talk about something that he thinks needs to be changed, how about listen? As to the stage issue. What if they only had the one stage? Set it up in Ireland or somewhere in the US? Everyone would want to go and see them there, and that would be far worse (in terms of emissions), than them bringing the show to us.

    • Anthony says:

      11:53pm | 02/12/10

      I am relieved that so many others can see through this mans self indulgent bs. Have only liked 1 or 2 of their sings in the last 15 or so years & cannot stand being preached to by rich people expecting me or my govt to throw our money away at lost causes. When he is living in a bedsit & his kids don’t have trust funds & his annual sunglass bill is less than the price of a new sedan then I will start listening to his bleating rants

    • Mike says:

      07:00am | 03/12/10

      The Hyprocisy extends to Bono’s support for the third World. The irish Government is one of the leaders, per capita, in contributing to ease poverty in the World. Recently Bono has stated how proud he is of the Irish Government. Yet he deprives this same Government of tax revenue by having U2’s holding Company which collects their millions in royalties in a tax haven!

    • Eyeman says:

      07:32am | 03/12/10

      Or of course… they/he could just NOT DO ANYTHING AT ALL like “insert overpaid sporting figure/celebrity/business person here”.

      People should spend less time complaining and picking faults with people like Bono using their position to raise awareness for numerous causes and spend more time actually doing something constructive themselves.

    • dianael says:

      11:55am | 03/12/10

      I used to be one of those people who would say “it’s all very well for them grrr, grrr, grrr”  but I’ve recently come to the conclusion that I don’t care who says or does what, or what their motivation is - guilt, self-esteem, altruism, social conscience.  if they’re doing something, then good on ‘em. It’s all very well to sit in judgement but the bottom line is that Bono is creating awareness and raising money. For every person that says I don’t want to hear the preaching, there may be one that says I didn’t know that was happening and I’m going to donate or exert pressure or boycott. I’m not a huge U2 fan but I’m not going to knock anyone who is trying to make a difference. He has a huge public profile and its good that he uses it for the right reasons and to make people think.  As for the huge show - its probably unnecessary but would the cost to the environment be less if they did a series of small concerts a la Pink.

    • See through it! says:

      06:15am | 04/12/10

      Glad I was close to a toilet when I was watching that “touching” tribute to the NZ miners. Felt quite bilious after it. Probably ended up selling more records for U2, but how do you think those miner’s families feel? Did he donate proceeds of the gig to the grieving families? I doubt it. Just scamming the people to come across as the caring stadium act.

    • Louisa says:

      11:49am | 04/12/10

      I am so glad I found this blog! I thought I was the only cynic in the village! Thank you!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

Federal government MP is going all kinds of crazy places to get Oz a UN Security Council seat. Next up: Gabon? http://t.co/i2mHmITH

Daniel Piotrowski

Sorry ex-premier, I'm not paying for your lunch. http://t.co/Kg0G8PBl

ToryShepherd

SA. It's the middle bottom bit. (PS I think I heard that phrase on @triplej, apologies for nicking!) http://t.co/YOhdLSlj

Lucy Kippist

Complimentary packing, free childcare & convenience aplenty. Thats what i want from the supermarket. How about you? http://t.co/FV4tgjji

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Bill Kelty made a memorable speech last week. Addressing the ACTU Congress Dinner in Sydney, the legendary…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Speaking of yourself in the third person is usually a sign that you’re suffering from delusions…

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

If South Australia had just arrived in the world, red and wrinkled and mewling, what would we call it?…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

241 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter