U2’s 360 degrees tour has touched down in Australia and is in full swing. Much like the main feature of the tour, stories have been coming from every direction on how extravagant the concert is. How the big scale, big vision, and big cost have lead to the biggest concert event ever.

You have to admit, the numbers are pretty impressive.
U2’s two year world tour has run up an $850,000 dollars daily running cost, and last year took $123 million as the highest grossing tour of 2009. ‘The claw’ stage that dominates the band as they play towers at an impressive height of 164 feet. It is so large that it took six 747 jets to get it to Australia.
It’s supported by a crew of 130 people, and relies on 55 trucks to get around the country. ‘The claw’ is such a massive structure that the car park under Etihad Stadium in Melbourne required reinforcement, and the roof couldn’t close either.
While in some ways it makes for an impressive production, it’s a bit strange that a band that is so involved in activism and an open supporter of Greenpeace touts excessive displays as this as something to be celebrated.
Carbonfootprint.com has crunched the numbers as up to 65,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide, or enough to fly the four band members to Mars - and back. To offset their two year tour of excess (and they have claimed that they will) U2 would have to plant more than 20,000 trees per year.
For a band that has been more than a bit heavy handed preaching about limiting excess and supporting charity, that’s got to sound pretty hypocritical and empty from two years beneath a giant claw on the biggest stage show ever. Offsetting that kind of wastage, while admirable, is completely different from never being wasteful in the first place.
On cost alone, it’s being touted as the end game of stadium rock. But is spending that much money really worth it? Does the fact that U2 can cram 60,000 people into standing-only venue make for a better show? How many jets does it take for us to be impressed by the number? Is it six, or will four do? Is the dollar figure really something that we will remember in later years as making the show more memorable?
There’s no doubt that U2 can still bring out a number 1 album (perhaps more of force of habit rather than anything else) but it’s pretty much a given that the 60,000 strong audience will be clambering more for their work from The Joshua Tree and Achtung Baby rather than anything from their most recent releases.
As someone who was raised on a steady, consistent diet of U2’s musical offerings, I struggle to name a single song past their 1993 ‘hit single’ Lemon.
If U2 really wanted to practice what they preached, it would maybe be more impressive if they had a minimalist show on a stage in the middle of a large crowd. If people are going to see U2, they’ll see them whether there’s a stadium spectacular, or four guys on a stage in the middle of a stadium, still essentially delivering the same 360 degrees experience.
I’m sure there’s no one out there who felt more inclined to buy tickets to a U2 concert simply based on the impressive nature of the stage the band are playing on. Dare I say it… isn’t it the music that should matter?
Matt’s blog: End of the Spectrum
Facebook Recommendations
Read all about it
Punch live
Up to the minute Twitter chatter
Federal government MP is going all kinds of crazy places to get Oz a UN Security Council seat. Next up: Gabon? http://t.co/i2mHmITH
SA. It's the middle bottom bit. (PS I think I heard that phrase on @triplej, apologies for nicking!) http://t.co/YOhdLSlj
Complimentary packing, free childcare & convenience aplenty. Thats what i want from the supermarket. How about you? http://t.co/FV4tgjji
Recent posts
The latest and greatest
Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters
Bill Kelty made a memorable speech last week. Addressing the ACTU Congress Dinner in Sydney, the legendary…
Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…
Speaking of yourself in the third person is usually a sign that you’re suffering from delusions…
South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.
If South Australia had just arrived in the world, red and wrinkled and mewling, what would we call it?…
Nosebleed Section
choice ringside rantings
From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments
Michael S says:
"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone
Change Up! says:
I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]Gentle jabs to the ribs
They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments
A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more
Most commented