A recent edition of the New Yorker carried a cartoon that depicts a man about to be executed by firing squad. Beside him an executioner holds out a mobile phone and asks: “Last tweet?” (You can see it here)

This is an incisive analysis of the wild variance of the content on Twitter. Suspected previous tweets for our cartoon hero: “Just about to go through security.” Or: “Putting on my hood now.” It’s the Twitter rollercoaster. One moment you can be reading about someone eating an egg sandwich. The next, you can be reading first-hand news of one of the stories of the year and looking at a photo like this:

Photo by Twitter user Janis Krums of the plane that ditched in New York's Hudson River in January.

Jack Dorsey, Twitter’s creator, says the service will be a success “when it’s not talked about so much”, and when people just use and accept it “like electricity”. Amen. The incessant hype and stream of stories has become a bore. Yes, it breaks news in ways traditional big media outlets cannot. Yes, it’s yet another challenge for big media companies to get to grips with. Yes, it’s a valuable search tool. Twitter’s success is proof, though, of something much more unsettling - or exciting, depending on your point of view.

It’s that the media landscape is now in a state of constant flux. Companies that want to stay ahead should be ready to deal with not just Twitter, but with whatever comes next. For media companies this is especially pressing, as audiences expect their information providers to be in touch with these trends, report on those that matter, and use to good tools to engage in conversation. Twitter is just the latest, though, in a stream of innovations that has slowly come to life through its users before generating a hysterical craze and then settling down to an always-on background feature of daily life.

Take Facebook and YouTube. Neither is yet five years old but both have transformed how information - everything from video, photos, and news, to comment, analysis, political campaigning and marketing - moves between people. Twitter, a nuggety micro-blogging service (who would have thought that would take off?) has joined them in the mainstream. It won’t be the last.

I’m enthusiastic about these changes, and fascinated by the way services like YouTube and Twitter transform from rough-and-ready startups to giants of the digital landscape. But dealing with a constant stream of them forever is exhausting to even think about. You mean I have to learn how to use another website? Register another account and create another password I’ll forget? Brush up on another load of jargon?

Tiring. But this is what’s ahead in a world where hundreds of millions of people can visit a website, create its content and determine how it’s used.

So has Twitter gone as far as it can go? Not yet. In one of the more recent of the long stream of articles on how Twitter is going to change the world, Time magazine recently pointed out “the most fascinating thing about Twitter is not what it’s doing to us. It’s what we’re doing to it.” It’s not just using hashtags to discuss TV shows like Masterchef in real time. I’m not going to attempt to explain the geek stuff (Time does a good job of it) but it should be enough to say that smart people can do cool things with Twitter.

This is because Twitter’s computers are like the Sydneysiders of the global computer network. They’re very accessible and easy to talk to. Other computers can connect with Twitter and and pull out chunks or streams of data, and then combine it all with something else to create something entirely new. Come up with the right idea and you suddenly have something far cooler than old Twitter, like this real-time map of where British people are planning holidays (sponsored by a phone company):

Holiday planning in real time, at ukholsmap.com

Imagine every doctor in the country tweeting confirmed flu cases by location, and you’re suddenly telling a big news story in real-time, in a way that’s useful to people.

Sure, the majority of Twitter’s content might be generated by a small proportion of its audience. But as long as people don’t get bored and move on to something else (Facebook, anyone?) Twitter will continue to break certain types of news, act as a recommendation engine, and analyse television shows and news events, faster than any other publishing platform.

If you’re in business - and not just the media business - this is the world you’re in now. What do you think will be the next Twitter or Facebook? After Twitter to message your network and friends, and Facebook to find them, what else do you need?

You can follow me on Twitter here: @colgo

6 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Adam Dennis says:

      08:57am | 16/06/09

      Google’s Wave platform (coming in September) has the potential to transform a myriad of communication technologies - email, blogs, comments on blogs, facebook and more - into a single, open discussion mechanism. In today’s world, I’m leaving my comment here and I’ll never see it again. In a Wave world, I could leave my comment here and then follow the developing discussion in my Wave client on my own machine - no need to come back to this page to see what’s being said. And then the discussion might continue separately, off the site, without me having to know the commenters personally. It’s a rich model.

      Of course, having the potential to change the world and actually changing the world are two different things. Why has Twitter succeeded where so many other bright ideas failed? It’s a fickle world, the Web.

    • Chris says:

      10:45am | 16/06/09

      I don’t want another Twitter. Does that make me a luddite? Can’t we all make a pact and just keep this one?

      For me the most successful medium is the one that not only works well, performs a service, but most importantly connects to the most amount of people. Bebo might be fantastic, but if it’s another division instead of an inclusion, then it’s never going to work. Twitter works because somehow at some stage, the world decided “ok let’s do this”. It’s entirely about the content.

      Unless Twitter breaks (for whatever reason), I just don’t think we need to be looking towards the next big thing. The hook of Twitter isn’t that it’s new and exciting, it’s entirely on the connection and information.

      But I guess that’s like saying “right, we’ve invented the steam train, I think we’re done here!” Ergh, I suddenly want to become Amish.

    • JG says:

      11:22am | 16/06/09

      Yeah, steam trains were pretty cool.

      And the only reason Twitter would/will be replaced by TNBT is if/because TNBT is better/faster/cleaner/less smoky etc.

      eg Google hasn’t been replaced yet because nothing better has come along.

    • Rowan M says:

      11:46am | 16/06/09

      “Amen. The incessant hype and stream of stories on how has become a bore”

      *cough* ... nevermind

      it’s been suggested that the next wave in digital technology will involve customisation / democratisation of content by the users.  like twitter is customisable and simple depending on your needs - but more expansive in platform.

      bad news for corporates wanting to squeeze money out of the next big thing, but great for the rest of us.

    • Dave Earley says:

      12:06pm | 16/06/09

      Innumerable social networking sites have risen and fallen, and the need to have a dabble, or at least secure your handle/identity will continue as well.

      Startups are all vying to create the “next big thing”, and there are going to be awesome developments in online interaction, but I’d like something that can reliably manage all those divergent networks we’re on.

      If Google Wave can do that great, but are developers going to agree on just one standard? OpenID, OpenSocial, OAuth, FacebookConnect?

      The next big thing for me would be to see one open standard employed through the APIs of any new social network - and really hand over control of personal information to the users.

      Maybe it could automatically (as an option) create your account with new social networks using your preferred online “brand” or name, also helping to standardise networking or locating people across different platforms.

      Or not. I’m sure we’ll cope

    • Paul says:

      12:32pm | 16/06/09

      The next big thing will be whatever the early Twitter adopters, offended by its mainstream success (think #herebeforeoprah), start hyping up next.

      The crowd I’m talking about are those who sub-consciously (or consciously) need to feel that they are more savvy than the average person by being first in to something that should be big (in their opinion).  The irony is once that thing becomes big they get disillusioned and move on again, continuing the cycle.

      So far that kind of seems to be Friendfeed, but the flaw there is a bigger effort to adopt than something as simple as Twitter.

      I like what Jack Dorsey said though.  I’ll be happy when Twitter is just a thing a lot of people use without all the wide-eyed gushing from mainstream media people “discovering” it.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

Federal government MP is going all kinds of crazy places to get Oz a UN Security Council seat. Next up: Gabon? http://t.co/i2mHmITH

Daniel Piotrowski

Sorry ex-premier, I'm not paying for your lunch. http://t.co/Kg0G8PBl

ToryShepherd

SA. It's the middle bottom bit. (PS I think I heard that phrase on @triplej, apologies for nicking!) http://t.co/YOhdLSlj

Lucy Kippist

Complimentary packing, free childcare & convenience aplenty. Thats what i want from the supermarket. How about you? http://t.co/FV4tgjji

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Bill Kelty made a memorable speech last week. Addressing the ACTU Congress Dinner in Sydney, the legendary…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Speaking of yourself in the third person is usually a sign that you’re suffering from delusions…

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

If South Australia had just arrived in the world, red and wrinkled and mewling, what would we call it?…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

241 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter