In 1992, a 20 year old from Florida made surfing history. Kelly Slater qualified for the quarter finals of the Alternativa Surf International in Rio to claim the World Title.

To celebrate, he's going to dash home and veg out to a mellow Jack Johnson CD. Pic: AP

The American media had high hopes, looking to him to be the next Tom Curren and when asked about reaching the same kind of highs as his surfing idol’s career, Slater, slightly camera shy and still unassuming about his future replied, “I don’t know, I’m not really thinking about that right now, I’m just thinking about having won the World Title, and hopefully winning another one someday”.

Nineteen years and 10 World Titles later… Kid Kelly is now King Kelly.

From the youngest ever World Champion, Slater is now the oldest - a surfing champion and undoubtedly a sporting legend.

An embarrassing ASP calculation glitch saw Slater crowned twice in San Francisco, once last week on the one-year anniversary of the death of his long time rival, friend and three-time World Champion Andy Irons, and again yesterday morning. The fans didn’t mind. Who wouldn’t want to relive it all again? Slater himself brought the issue to the ASP’s attention. Not fazed by the error, he just got on with business and made it official.

On Ocean Beach on that first historic day, Kelly’s partner Kalani Miller wore a T-Shirt which read “Jordan + Kobe = Slater”. His achievement ranks as high as the accomplishments of his country’s two greatest basketballers, and some may argue sportsmen, combined. Kobe Bryant is a five-time NBA Champion, Michael Jordan has six titles. In an American sporting context, that’s huge.

In an international context that T-Shirt could read “Schumacher + Federer = Slater”. Schumacher, a 7-time World Formula One Champion, and Federer was World Number One for more than four consecutive years.

Slater has done something no one, not even he himself, ever thought possible. He has single-handedly put surfing on the map and inspired generations of grommets and (just three months off his 40th birthday) middle-aged men across the world.

There are few 39 year olds continuing to compete at such an elite level and continuing to dominate the sport in the same way. Schumacher is 43 in January but his run behind the wheel of Mercedes in Grand Prix hasn’t seen him grace the podium once since his comeback.

Slater is as competitively fierce as he is chilled and free. The guys he continues to beat on the Tour are the ones he inspired to start surfing in the first place and in an ironic twist, it is these young surfers he credits for his continued competitive drive.

His life is a barrel of laughs. Pic: AP

There are some who have difficulty rating Slater’s success - those who argue surfing is not a sport, just a pastime. It’s as much a hobby as kicking a ball around the park is to football, or shooting some hoops with friends at the courts is to basketball. That argument just doesn’t stack up, but it’s the predictable criticism when Slater makes world domination look so easy.

It’s also somewhat expected when the typical image of a surfer is the laid back, chilled out character. Slater defies yet at the same time defines that stereotype.

There’s a fierce competitive vein that pulsates on the World Tour and it beats hard in Slater’s blood. It’s that froth for victory and firing sensation that comes from riding the winning waves that have spurred Slater on for decades.

In 1998 he said to the media “You only have a short career as a surfer. It’s not like you have 20 years”. Not knowing when his barrel of success would end, Slater has made the most of his years on tour and his time at the top. He set his own benchmarks, pushed boundaries and teased expectations. He gave surfing its story, history…its fokelore.

It has come with its rewards too, over 3 million dollars in prize money plus copious millions more in sponsorships, appearances and publicity. His net worth is an estimated $30 million.

Put it this way - there’s little Kelly has to pay for on a weekly basis. Boards, fins, wetties, travel, accommodation, dinners, all the sunglasses, hats, thongs, clothes on his back and in his wardrobe are all paid for. He’s a walking billboard and his every step chimes ka-ching for sponsors. Quiksilver has arguably become the multi-million dollar company it is today because of Slater’s success.

To any footballer such money, fame, success and the speed to which he came into all three would be a recipe for scandalous disaster, back page news quickly becoming front page controversy. Yet Slater has kept a clean skin throughout it all, the closest he’s come to drama is his role as “Jimmy Slade” on Baywatch – a regrettable move, but hey why not?

Slater has been fiercely loyal to his long time sponsor Quiksilver, who he signed with in 1990 age 18. There are not too many high-profile athletes who can boast the same loyalty. He keeps his feet firmly planted on a board and when travelling isn’t too big to join the locals unannounced for a surf in which ever break he happens to find himself near.

He doesn’t ask for special privileges, nor priority for waves, just chats to the others in the water as he would any surfer. It’s that chilled surfing mentality that makes him the perfect athlete, role model and icon for generations to come.

From 10 in 2010 to 11 in 2011, I hope it’s 12 in 2012 and many more years on the Tour to come, After all, what’s he going to do if he retires? Fly around the world surfing? He might as well keep doing it competitively.

69 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Mahhrat says:

      05:54am | 08/11/11

      Congratulations Kelly, you lived the dream and turned your hobby into your multi-million dollar career.

      If only I had a hobby…

    • VVS says:

      07:27am | 08/11/11

      Hey, it’s that guy that used to be in Baywatch…

    • Sherlock says:

      07:30am | 08/11/11

      Correction: Roger Federer

    • AFR says:

      08:26am | 08/11/11

      The same Federer that finally won something this year by smashing up a nobody to win his home indoor title?

    • Sherlock says:

      08:35am | 08/11/11

      The same Roger Federer who has earnt more than $60 million dollars just in prize money, won nearly 70 world titles and still number 4 in the world.  Not much to rest on really.

      What achievements do you have champ?

      None?

      Thought so.

    • AFR says:

      09:43am | 08/11/11

      No need to get all defensive Sherlock. The article is about Kelly Slater, not me, and I think a man who has won 11 world titles, and doing so with ease at almost 40, safely trumps Federer, who has achieved many great things in his career (and he’ll go down as one of the greatest tennis players ever), but lets face it, he’s yesterday’s man. He’s got donut of winning another Grand Slam.

    • Sherlock says:

      10:10am | 08/11/11

      I see, 11 world titles trumps 70 world titles.

    • AFR says:

      10:31am | 08/11/11

      Federer has won 70 tournaments - but only finished 4 years (from memory) as #1, so i’d count that as only 4 “world titles”.

    • Super Duper Man says:

      11:04am | 08/11/11

      LOL. My hero is better than your hero!

    • AFR says:

      11:42am | 08/11/11

      What it does highlight is that comparing sportsman from different eras is hard enough, let alone different sports. Long live the debate!

    • stephen says:

      07:51am | 08/11/11

      In the early days - when Tracks was a newspaper - surfing contest were for the faint-hearted, (‘fainthearted’, cause if your mated found out you entered one, your cars distributor would be tethered).
      You surfed because it was the first example, I think, where attitude became life-style : it was just great to be driving down to black-rock, (and in ‘72, when Endless Summer was showing at The Allambra) this spot was known only to a few ... until the Surfing Competition.
      The ‘Schoolboys Championship’ held at Burleigh, was the first comp.
      (I wasn’t half good enough, but me mate Murray was.)
      It was good to watch a winner, and we all had now a reason to shave, ie, the cameras, but I had only 2 hairs, so the shaving foam I kept for me other mates wedding-car.
      These were the days when milk and rolls at first light was the order, and we all were leaning against the fender waiting for the sou’easter to push up the swell - now at Kirra, one of the best point-breaks in the world - and at 8 or 9 feet, was magic.
      Hours went by, and I was meant to be at work.
      Work ?
      Nah, life was better.
      The old surfers have got married, had a family, and watched the Kelly Master rip up the wave like no-one else.
      We weren’t even close, we weren’t even the first, yet I/we know how it’s done.

      He’s the best.

    • neo says:

      08:00am | 08/11/11

      LOL @ “world’s greatest sportsman”, that’s going a bit far for someone whom most of the world has never even heard of.

    • Zoe says:

      10:06am | 08/11/11

      You don’t need to know who Kelly Slater is for him to be the best.

      Nobel prize winners are the best in their field, how many could you name off the top of your head?

    • Sarah says:

      11:14am | 08/11/11

      You’d have to be living under a rock to not have heard of him.

    • neo says:

      02:11pm | 08/11/11

      Obama got a prize, and he is not the best in any field. And yeah, hate to break it to you, but most of the human population would have no clue who he is, simply because the sport is not very popular globally.

      Either way, to call him the greatest sportsman ever is a massive overstatement.

    • Shane* says:

      08:08am | 08/11/11

      Michael Jordan remains the greatest sportsperson of all time and the only three men alive capable of scaling that mountain are Roger Federer, Rafa Nadal (If either has a late-career renaissance) and Lionel Messi (if he continues his current trajectory).

      Slater excels in a fringe sport that has only been fully professional for a generation, and only in the last decade has cast aside the ‘smoke weed, rock up on the day and try and surf a bit’ mentality.

      To compare Slater to Jordan is laughable. By this “11>6” logic, Phil Taylor is the world’s greatest sportsperson (13 Time World Darts Champion) and Slater has only just caught Boston Celtics legend Bill Russell (11 World Championships).

      Jordan dominated both ends of the court like no-one before or since. He breathed life back into basketball and became the most recognisable and marketable face on planet earth. He never once lost on the biggest stage (The Finals). 5 MVP awards, 10 All-NBA First Team designations, 9 All-Defensive 1st Team honors, 14 NBA All-Star Game appearances, 3 All-Star Game MVP awards, 10 scoring titles, 3 steals titles, 6 NBA Finals MVP awards, and a Defensive Player of the Year Award.

      And ultimately, to be the best surfer in the world, you have to beat a few thousand people who take it seriously. To be the best soccer player in the world Lionel Messi has risen to the top of MILLIONS of people. Which is more impressive?

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      08:32am | 08/11/11

      Jordan was the greatest I think to, only one who could compare would be Ali.

      Jordan was known world wide, turned sports sponsorship into an industry, won 6 NBA titles while playing around 100 games a year for 15 or so years.

    • neo says:

      08:32am | 08/11/11

      Uhh, I’m thinking more Pele, John Terry, Wladimir Klitschko and Andre Agassi, purely on their sporting greatness.

    • Shane* says:

      08:49am | 08/11/11

      @ neo

      John Terry… are you havin’ a laugh!? Chelsea fan I take it?

    • bella starkey says:

      08:59am | 08/11/11

      John Terry is a very bad man.

    • undertow says:

      09:43am | 08/11/11

      Stats are stats… You could start talking the stats of people like ice hockey legend Wayne Gretzky and they make Jordan’s history pale in comparison. It is always going to be open to subjective opinion. (So is considering surfing a “fringe sport” as it begins to take hold in some of the most populous regions on earth while having the highest retail turnover of any sport. Again, that is subjective opinion.)

      What is hard to deny that Slater’s longevity in such a high performance sport and his continuing relevance as a ground-breaking surfer in what is a rapidly evolving discipline puts him on the map with the rest of these amazing athletes.

      Slater ranks up there with the best of them and it is extremely hard to separate them out from such vastly different fields.

    • Little Joe says:

      10:26am | 08/11/11

      The Greatest Sportsman of All Time ....... KEN ROSEWALL.

      “What??” I hear you say. “Surely he is not as good as Federer, Nadal or Sampras”

      My account values not only career titles, but career longevity.

      Ken Rosewall only won 8 Grand Slam Titles (Lost 8 in the Final), as opposed to Federer’s 16 ..... but Ken Rosewall was not allowed to play Grand Slams during the peak of his career for more than 10-years (1957 until the French Open in 1968) because of his professional status. 45 opportunities lost!!! During this period he won 15 of the 32 Pro Slams.

      He won his first Grand Slam, The Australian Open, in 1953 and won his last Grand Slam in 1972, again the Australian Open. He made the Final of the US Open in 1974. To match this fete, Roger Federer would have to win Wimbledon in 2022 ..... Rafael Nadal would have to win the French Open in 2024.

      Ken Rosewall was ranked in the Top 20 for 25-years.

      Finally I would like to add, he was a natural left hander but his father made him play with his right hand ... which possibly attributed to his weaker serve.

      KEN ROSEWALL is the Greatest Sportsman of All Time.

    • Shane* says:

      10:48am | 08/11/11

      @undertow, I agree completely about stats. But the fact is that surfing absolutely IS a fringe sport in comparison to soccer, basketball, cricket, tennis etc… A quick look at participation rates will show this to be true. Slater might be the greatest surfer ever… but standing atop the ‘Surf Mountain’ still leaves you at a lower altitude than standing even halfway up the ‘basketball mountain.’

    • Shane* says:

      11:15am | 08/11/11

      @Little Joe…

      And if you put Ken Rosewall on a court in his prime playing against Federer in his prime, Rosewall would struggle to win a game, let alone the match.

    • Bruce says:

      11:49am | 08/11/11

      Little Joe: Spot on and totally agree. Ken Rosewall career 1949 to 1980, amazing. “Shane’ agree, however, your statement just about applies to almost every sportsman that ever existed. Very hard to compare eras when past equipment and training methods were possibly inferior.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Rosewall

    • Little Joe says:

      12:14pm | 08/11/11

      @ Shane.

      I doubt that very much ...... especially if Federer had to play with the old smaller, wooden rackets. Many people in the know would have loved to have seen Laver and Rosewall playing with the modern rackets. Many attribute the new rackets for Rosewall’s longevity of play.

      If they played at their prime at Roland Garos and both had wooden rackets, Rosewall would win 6-2, 6-1, 6-2.

    • Shane* says:

      12:28pm | 08/11/11

      @Little Joe,

      That’s an interesting hypothetical. But while your scoreboard may be accurate, if they played on the Grass at Wimbledon (Considered the pinnacle of the sport for purists) with modern racquets, Federer would win 6-0, 6-0, 6-0. Too strong, too fast, and too skillful.

      It is the nature of sport that it is always evolving - and evolution means improvement.

    • undertow says:

      12:57pm | 08/11/11

      Shane… If you climbed the tallest mountain on earth from the bottom, you’d be below the peak of Everest, but you’d still have to have made a bigger climb than anyone on the planet to get to the top of Mauna Kea.

    • Little Joe says:

      01:37pm | 08/11/11

      @ Shane

      Now you are in trouble. Rosewall played in the Grass Era of Tennis. Rosewall’s game was serve/volley.

      Rosewall was only 5’ 7” ...... he didn’t win with power ..... he won with tenacity, accuracy and speed ...... reknowned speed.

      If they played at their prime at Wimbledon and both had wooden rackets, Rosewall would loose 6-4, 5-7, 6-8,6-4,12-10

      But if they played at their prime on Australian Grass at White City or Kooyong and both had wooden rackets, Rosewall would win 6-2, 4-6, 6-2, 6-3. And it would take 3-sets in Davis Cup!!!

      And 10-years after their prime, Federer would down with cramps while Rosewall would be wiping sweat off his brow.

    • Shane* says:

      01:44pm | 08/11/11

      @Undertow. Perhaps, but for that to be relevant sufring would have to be a freaking huge mountain… which it isn’t. Compared to football or basketball or tennis or cricket it is a molehill.

    • undertow says:

      02:15pm | 08/11/11

      You’d be surprised how big that molehill really is.

    • neo says:

      02:19pm | 08/11/11

      Chelsea all the way, but that’s beside the point.

      I have never seen a defender who works as hard as Terry does, both for Chelsea and for England, often with complete disregard of his own well being.

      You can say what you like about him as a person, but as a sportsman, he is second to none.

    • Shane* says:

      03:35pm | 08/11/11

      @Little Joe

      Rosewall wouldn’t stand a hope in hell against a 200km/h+ serve, the likes of which he never would have seen. Comparing even the mid-80s players with today’s, there is no comparison. The speed and spin the modern player puts on the ball is beyond anything Rosewall could ever fathom. He would be embarassed. It wouldn’t even be close. Bernard Tomic would spank Ken Rosewall off the court if they both played using modern racquets. Sorry, but a short trip to YouTube is all you’ll need to see I’m right. You can actually see the ball travelling back then. I would estimate Rosewall’s 1st serves as around 150km/h… well below the average female serve today.

      Times move on, and tennis has evolved. Federer represents the most complete player to date… but even he will be surpassed.

      @undertow

      Surfing Australia reported in 2010 that they had a little over 20,000 people participate in an official event. My local basketball stadium looks after around half that number of people BY ITSELF in any given year. Molehill.

    • Bruce says:

      06:44pm | 08/11/11

      Shane: Not sure of your arguement now. One hand you agree Federers will be surpased in the future but continue to argue hypatheticals about past and present tennis players. To argue past and present results of the pairing of past and present players is purerly subjective, and can never be proved in fact, considering the many variables involves, albiet logic would imply current sportsmen and women should be better than past sportesman. Using that logic then all past sports results such as the olympic games, Don Bradman cricket career, Ian Thorpes swimming results, Squash champion Heather McKays 16 British Open titles etc , must be ridicled for the purpose of a purerly subjective arguement. I prefer to remember great sports people for their achievement at their particular moment in time, particularly those that can achieve world class results over many years or decades.

    • Little Joe says:

      10:02pm | 08/11/11

      @ Shane

      Just one final analogy ..... my 14yo son serves at 160km/hr. He is 5 ‘8” and not a scrap of muscle. It’s not that difficult with the modern racket.

      I appreciate your sentiment, which is why my hypotheticals are always with the wooden racket.

      Rosewall was a more complete player over a longer period.

    • undertow says:

      09:56am | 09/11/11

      “Surfing Australia reported in 2010 that they had a little over 20,000 people participate in an official event. My local basketball stadium looks after around half that number of people BY ITSELF in any given year. Molehill.”

      You’d see more than twice that many surfers on the Gold Coast on any given weekend, NOT participating in an official event. It would be the biggest participant sport on the Gold Coast EVERY weekend. Just because it doesn’t need a stadium or an organisation to run it doesn’t mean it isn’t happening. Change your paradigms.

    • Bob says:

      10:15am | 09/11/11

      The number of players in a sport doesn’t actually make that much of a difference to the level of the top players. If it did the Australian cricket team would have absolutely no hope against the Indian cricket team as the India has 100 times more people playing the sport (probably more people play cricket in India than there are people in Australia).

    • Sad Sad Reality says:

      08:40am | 08/11/11

      Something you can do stoned out of your mind is not a sport we need to pay attention to.

    • chaz says:

      09:00am | 08/11/11

      Is that why Lawn Bowls doesn’t get much attention?

    • Andrew says:

      09:49am | 08/11/11

      People can probably do most sports in some capacity stoned out of their mind.

    • Sad Sad Reality says:

      09:58am | 08/11/11

      Same with darts, snooker, table tennis. The rise of poker has been troubling.

    • AFR says:

      10:07am | 08/11/11

      Ben Johnson was on drugs too - just of a different kind.

    • Sad Sad Reality says:

      10:41am | 08/11/11

      Ben Johnson is a god.

    • Ben C says:

      12:59pm | 08/11/11

      @ SSR

      I give you Diego Maradona and Paul Gascoigne - two of the greatest soccer players of their generations. Maradona, as we all know, got done for cocaine. Gascoigne is a recovering alcoholic, and played a fair number of games whilst paralytic - and won a number of “Man of the Match” awards in that condition.

    • Sad Sad Reality says:

      01:12pm | 08/11/11

      Coke and alcohol. Now there’s an entertaining combination.

    • Kate says:

      03:52pm | 08/11/11

      You wouldn’t think you could play AFL at the highest level while drugged up, but Ben Cousins proved that wrong.

    • Little Joe says:

      08:41am | 08/11/11

      Once again Australia’s facination with sports people

      So he can surf!!! Big deal!! Our media continue to erode values and detract from real heros of our society.

      During the week paramedics will attend accidents and save lives, surf lifesavers will rescue the drowning, doctors will perform life saving surgery, call center workers will talk a teenager out of commiting suicide and volunteers will feed the homeless.

    • AFR says:

      10:10am | 08/11/11

      So, because there are lots of bad things going on, we can’t talk about sports? Debates like this are the one thing that brings people (admittedly mostly men) together, whether it be at a weekend BBQ, at the pub, or in an internet forum. Whether we vote left or right, we’re christian or muslim, black or white, sport is the great leveller. Nobody is pretending its a life or death discussion.

    • Mattb says:

      09:29am | 08/11/11

      Slater, what can you say, hes a freak of nature. 11 world titles and still powering. Influenced an entire generation of young surfers, myself included. As soon as I saw that short video ‘Kelly slater- in black and white’ I knew surfing was about to change direction. It certainly did. Tom carroll’s snap under the lip a pipe was fucking awesome but Kelly’s ability to effortlessly chuck his board in any position on a wave and come out of it with more speed blew me away. The man is gods (huey) gift to surfing, there will never be another.

      Best sportsman ever is a big call though, close to it, definitely top 5. Hard to go past Ali. Federer is in the mix but ruins it by being a tosser at times. And golf, being the hardest sport, has to be included which means Tiger and the golden bear need mentioning. And there’s also Shawn white with world titles in both skateboarding and snowboarding. But that just my opinion…

    • Andrew says:

      09:52am | 08/11/11

      Kind of amazed no one has mentioned any Cricketers yet, Don Bradman and Garfield Sobers etc etc. Or is this only for living sportsman?

    • bella starkey says:

      10:19am | 08/11/11

      Does all this really make up for the fact his parents named him Kelly?

    • hawker says:

      10:29am | 08/11/11

      Think of the talent pools respective sports draw from. Currently it’s Messi first, daylight second.

    • remlap says:

      10:52am | 08/11/11

      His parents named him Robert Kelly Slater. Kelly is of Gaelic origin. It can mean Strife or Bright-headed. Either works for the chrome domed master.

    • Tim says:

      10:51am | 08/11/11

      I don’t consider anything which requires a judge deciding how well you did to be a proper sport so while Slater is amazing he can’t be the best sportsman in the world.

    • Bob says:

      09:59am | 09/11/11

      What a naive thing to say. It is more of a proper sport than car driving, or things like gridiron or golf where fat people can play at the highest level.

    • Kebabpete says:

      11:15am | 08/11/11

      If you’re talking world titles then the best sportsman ever is Phil Taylor. He’s won 15 world titles, 11 world match play, 10 world grand prix, 3 grand slams, a world masters, and a world trophy. He’s won national and continent titles in the UK, Europe and the US, and holds 16 of the top 20 televised match averages.

      Kelly Slater is an awesome surfer, and no doubt a great athlete. But if you’re comparing titles, he fails in comparison.

    • Shane* says:

      11:23am | 08/11/11

      This highlights how ridiculous it is to consider Slater the greatest on the back of his 11 World Titles alone. All factors must be considered, including the fact that surfing is a small sport. Lionel Messi is the greatest current sportsperson, and he’s closing in on Michael Jordan as the greatest ever. All he needs is another few seasons of genius, a few domestic titles, European titles, and to excel in the World Cup.

      If he can manage that, the argument becomes about “second-best-after-Messi.”

    • AFR says:

      11:47am | 08/11/11

      Messi is also playing a team sport, which makes these comparisons all the more damned harder. Personally I don’t think the “size” of the sport is much of a determining factor (but of course many others would not agree with that statement either).

    • Tim says:

      11:54am | 08/11/11

      Shane,
      I disagree with Messi because he’s not completely dominant.
      Yes he may be the best soccer player (just) but he isn’t that much better than a lot of others.
      Michael Jordan was clearly better than anyone of his time and was a completely dominant player.
      Tiger Woods at his peak was the same in golf.
      I don’t think you can say the same for Messi, which is why I couldn’t have him on top.

    • Shane* says:

      12:35pm | 08/11/11

      @Tim,

      You clearly, CLEARLY have not watched much soccer over the last two years or so. Messi has put absolute daylight between himself and Ronaldo, who in turn has daylight between himself and a swathe of players like Rooney, Sniejder, Iniesta, Van Persie (more recently) etc…

      Messi, right now, is absolutely priceless as a player. To have him in your side is to strike fear into the opposition. Watch an El Calsico game (Real Madrid v Barca) and watch some of the World’s Best defenders react with abject terror every time he touches the ball.

      I would ask who you would put at #2, but the correct answer is Ronaldo and the simple reality is that there is daylight between the two.

    • Luke says:

      02:22pm | 08/11/11

      Shane* you just continue to fill this column with manure.  If Messi was that good, Argentina would have won the World Cup.  Instead the Barcelona system adopted by Spain was successful.  A system that Messi undoubtedly benefits from.

      If Messi has been the best in the world, it’s been for a year or two, three max.  Got about 8 years to go, and probably 2 world cup victories required.  Good luck Lionel, you’re going to need it.

    • Shane* says:

      03:25pm | 08/11/11

      @Luke

      So because Messi hasn’t won a World Cup he cannot be the World’s best? What a ridiculous statement. He’s one man, and up against the ‘Frankly we have so much depth it’s almost unfair’ sides from Germany and Spain he would’ve had to play otherwordly (At 22, at his 1st World Cup) to win the tournament off his own boot. Your expectations are simply too lofty.

      The Barcelona System “adopted by Spain”? Wow. That betrays a startling ignorance of football strategy. The back 4 for Spain was essentially Barca’s Back 4, but the strategy was totally different. The midfield and attack for Spain played passing football, similar to Barca’s system sure but a much much simpler version.

      If Messi isn’t the World’s Best, I would be super-duper keen to know who you think IS the world’s best…

    • Brendan says:

      12:20pm | 08/11/11

      I think what’s important to remember is who the greats were competing against during their glory periods. I know Slater has been successful for many years but is there really that much depth in the world surfing title?

      Schumacher, same applies. Best car but no competition in the driver circles.  Valentino Rossi would be a better candidate in Motorsport circles due to the equipment being much more evenly matched.

      Surely Jordan would be up there because he dominated a professional league and global sport. Messi is in the same mould but without the prolonged domination that Jordan had (yet anyway)

    • HappyG says:

      12:55pm | 08/11/11

      Surfing may be a small sport globally and participant numbers pale in comparison to football, basketball, tennis etc. but for degree of difficulty it has to be right up there. Anyone who has ridden waves will tell you it’s a unique experience and damn difficult. It’s a moving playing field for a start. I doubt whether Kelly thinks about comparisons with other sportsmen but anyone who can compete with and beat guys half his age is certainly in the mix for the “worlds best” title.

    • realist says:

      05:56pm | 08/11/11

      Surfing is right up there with Ice dancing as a sport ,Really it is artistic not competative.There are no finite scores only judges opinions.So i would call him the Torville and Dean of the waves. Not the wolds greatest sports man lol.

    • stephen says:

      08:31pm | 08/11/11

      What, no comments for ‘Smokin’ Joe Frazier, one of the best heavyweights of all time ?
      Boxing is a tough, graceful, exacting, brutal, exciting sport ; it’s right up there with surfing an Cricket as our national pastime.

    • Utopia Boy says:

      04:22am | 09/11/11

      Surely Mark Richards was the best thing for surfing; inventing and developing the twin fin and winning four world titles, which really put surfing on the map!
      Go the Wounded Gull!

    • Garam chai says:

      08:47pm | 09/11/11

      Sachin Tendulkar is the worlds greatest sportsment.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

Sorry ex-premier, I'm not paying for your lunch. http://t.co/Kg0G8PBl

ToryShepherd

SA. It's the middle bottom bit. (PS I think I heard that phrase on @triplej, apologies for nicking!) http://t.co/YOhdLSlj

Lucy Kippist

Complimentary packing, free childcare & convenience aplenty. Thats what i want from the supermarket. How about you? http://t.co/FV4tgjji

Daniel Piotrowski

#Thomson will never get brothel tapes, CCTV-in-brothels experts tell the ABC. http://t.co/7YFORBBJ

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Bill Kelty made a memorable speech last week. Addressing the ACTU Congress Dinner in Sydney, the legendary…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Speaking of yourself in the third person is usually a sign that you’re suffering from delusions…

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

If South Australia had just arrived in the world, red and wrinkled and mewling, what would we call it?…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

241 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter