Twitter. It’s smarter than the average marketing company. More powerful, in its way, than the cleverest corporate PR machine. It’s loud, fierce, fast and honest. It’s the tool of the people and it’s here to stay.

Lesson 1: Here's how it works. People say what they think, not what you want to hear. Photo: Sky News.

Just ask Qantas. Not for the first time this year, somebody at The Occasionally Flying Kangaroo got the wrong end of the stick.

Yesterday’s #qantasluxury hashtag campaign was intended to boost goodwill for the company. They asked their customers to tweet their ideal luxury flight to generate some good publicity. It was meant to be the social media equivalent of a head massage. But it backfired.

Instead of co-operating, the justifiably aggrieved customers used it as an opportunity to fight back, tweeting thousands of angry messages at the airline for several months of delays.

Like: “#Qantasluxury is a thing of the past, such a shame it could not last. Regrettably the airline’s choice was to blow millions on Alan Joyce.”

And: “#qantasluxury is seeing your planes on Getaway not Four Corners”.

That’s customers 1, Qantas 0.

It’s clear to everyone that Qantas didn’t need another kick in the pants. So the four social media experts hired by the company last week to monitor public opinion have a lot to answer for. At the very least they had a responsibility to understand Twitter.

Twitter might be a handy tool for advertising agencies and marketing types but its real power lies with the mob. It’s a tool of the people. We use it promote ourselves, our work and our passions. We follow people we like, so we can read what they have to say about everything from what they ate for breakfast, to who they think should run for president.

On Twitter we are free to say and think whatever we like. We can be honest. Our thoughts are not controlled, so we’re free to say what we think, when we think it.

That’s also what makes it so powerful.

Remember the 2009 protests against the way the Iran election was conducted? So many people used the social media platform for political engagement that it was renamed the “Twitter election”.  After thirty years of personal and political repression, Iranians had access to a free social platform to air their “real” views. Suddenly, they could say what they think and the whole Twitter world was watching.

So just what did Qantas think they were going to achieve with that hashtag? In an article for Mumbrella yesterday, Alicia Kennedy of online monitoring services, said the catastrophe could have been avoided if the company had checked their “online temperature”.

Just three days after the Qantas grounding, the company received approximately 37, 000 negative social media mentions. That’s a belting in anyone’s language.

It should have also been something of a large hint as to the best course of action for crisis control. Like, steering clear of social media campaigns until the dust has settled. Or at the very least, offering their several thousand bruised customers more than a pair of posh pyjamas as recompense.

Most commented

36 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Sony B Goode says:

      04:57am | 24/11/11

      Social media is a good outlet for professional whingers and its a great outlet for the leftists lime whose only goal is to eat prosperity and turn it in to poo.

    • Nathan says:

      06:42am | 24/11/11

      You have no idea about twitter at all do you? Know what you are on about, twitter is the social media outlet which (except for Linkedin) is over represented with professionals.

      The people in Iran where just whingers when they used it? How about companies using it to promote upcoming campaigns?

    • Sony B Goode says:

      07:10am | 24/11/11

      Bit testy this morning Nathan? WHy don’t you respond to what I wrote rather than what you think I wrote?

    • Nathan says:

      07:49am | 24/11/11

      Sony B
      How about you write something that makes sense and not complete rubbish

    • jay-ded says:

      08:01am | 24/11/11

      Maybe you two should just twitter your gripe to each other?

    • Sony B Goode says:

      08:06am | 24/11/11

      The only rubbish is the leftist world view that the world owes you a living.

    • PsychoHyena says:

      01:57pm | 24/11/11

      @Sony sorry the only rubbish left in the world is that the rightist view that people are slaves.

    • Gratuitous Adviser says:

      05:56am | 24/11/11

      Twitter, Facebook, Punch and any other social media (who cares). The Qantas belting will continue until Joyce, the board (including the Rio and bow-tie man) and that terrible smart-alecky PR girl leave the company and move on.  I hope they fall on their sword and leave before Qantas is damaged beyond repair because it has been a total disaster since that regime took control of the company.  There are certain people in some organisations that are poison because every time the public see or hear them or their name their stomach churns.  Just ask the ALP about the Mark Arbib or John Robertson effect on them.

    • Kebabpete says:

      08:39am | 24/11/11

      If this was any other company other than Qantas would you blame them for wanting to modernize and restructure to fit into a global economy? The simple fact is that if Qantas continues as it is, and they give in to these ridiculous demands of the unions then they will not be able to compete and will go bust. Then they’ll all be out of jobs. 

      Some people are so small minded when it comes to Australian brands and international business.

    • Waiting says:

      09:16am | 24/11/11

      Which ridiculous demands would that be Pete?
      Prove you don’t have a “small” mind and list the ones you think are ridiculous.

    • TheRealDave says:

      11:02am | 24/11/11

      If they actually did want to modernize and restructure for the benefit of ALL thn I’d say go for it. Unfortuantley thats not the Corporate way. What we have here and indeed across the western corporate world is a short term ‘rape and pillage’ strategy desgined for short term goals and short term bonus payments to Directors/Board Members.

      Its in the best interests of board memeber to keep artificially pumping up 6 month and 12 month returns as quick as they can because they get multi million dollar bonuses for doing it. They don’t give a crap about whats going to happen 10 years down the track - theres no money in it for them. As soon as things look like they might be heading south they pull on the ripcord for that Golden Parachute and one last feed at the trough befor emoving on to plunder somewhere else.

      This is why Private Industry cannot build vast infrastructure projects like the NBN. The NBN is forecast to return ‘only’ 7% ROI over decades. So it WILL pay for itself and the government WILL make billions over the long running life of the project but Private Companies don’t even look at projects like this because it doesn’t make any short term profits which means no short term multimillion dollar bonuses for the board. Why would they launch somethign like this only to have some other bastard get a bonus 20 years down the track??? Makes no sense in our Corporate environment.

      Far far easier to sack 50% of your workforce, close down factories (that are still making modest profits mind you, they aren’t running at a loss or anythign close to it) and pay some third world workers $3 a day and present to the board your 25% cost savings and pocket that bonus cheque isn’t it? And next year you can sack another 50% and offshore their jobs….then when you run out of workers you can pay your lobbyists to get 457 visa to import cheap foreign labour and claim there’s a ‘labour shortage’ in order to make that last bit of saving before there’s nothing else left to cut - so then you jump ship and the once great company falls apart and is gone forever.

    • Gratuitous Adviser says:

      11:40am | 24/11/11

      Pete,
      It is very easy for Australian management (especially imported) to attack the ordinary Australian worker as being the cause of the demise of a business and hold themselves blameless for leading the race to the bottom.  In my experience, because of our culture (like other Western Countries), successful and long term Australian senior management need to have greater consultative and people skills that those of a third world dictatorial nature, to be considered good managers.  To bash third world employees without unions is easy.  To manage an educated, organised and egalitarian workforce, not so.  I have done both (for a company bigger than Qantas) and luckily my senior management was a lot more competent than what seems to be in Qantas ??
      By the by:  Unfortunatelly, I think Qantas is doomed anyway as the damage done by Joyce is non-reversable.  He and the board developed a management style using a sweaty sledgehammer and stupidity when they should have done this with a conductors baton and sophistication.

    • Gratuitous Adviser says:

      11:54am | 24/11/11

      Pete,
      It is very easy for Australian management (especially imported) to attack the ordinary Australian worker as being the cause of the demise of a business and hold themselves blameless for leading the race to the bottom.  In my experience, because of our culture (like other Western Countries), successful and long term Australian senior management need to have greater consultative and people skills that those of a third world dictatorial nature, to be considered good managers.  To bash third world employees without union representation is easy.  To manage an educated, organised and egalitarian workforce, not so.  I have been involved in both (for a company bigger than Qantas) and luckily my senior management was a lot more competent and experienced than what seems to be the case in contemporary Qantas??  Good managers and companies do not get into this much trouble.  The lockout was unforgivable and stupid, stupid, stupid,
      By the by:  Unfortunately, I think Qantas is doomed anyway as the damage done by the Board and Joyce is non-reversible.  He and the Board undertook a thuggish management style using a sweaty sledgehammer and stupidity when they should have advocated and undertook efficiency improvements with a conductor’s baton and sophistication.

    • Waiting says:

      12:52pm | 24/11/11

      Still waiting for those ridiculous demands Kebabman.

    • Mahhrat says:

      05:57am | 24/11/11

      It’s just another example of how out of touch the corporate world is with their consumers.  It is caused primarily by their size.

      There are so many layers between the consumer and the people deciding how the company will act towards the consumer that it’s impossible to effectively govern any more.

      Government agencies are exactly the same.  It’s all Chinese Whispers (apologies for the racial reference).  By the time the message gets up the chain, it’s garbled by several layers of politically-correct BS speak, and so the wrong decisions get made.

      If I were a multinational, I’d be using my own hashtag to communicate directly with my clients. 

      When was the last time the King walked amongst the peasantry?

    • marley says:

      08:04am | 24/11/11

      Being in the civil service, I’m sure your recognize the syndrome that the middle manager is focussed on the senior manager, the senior manager on the Permanent Secretary, and the Permanent Secretary on the Minister.  So, the public service thinks of the Minister as its client, and not the poor taxpayer who uses their services and pays their wages.  And surprise, surprise, that upward focus means the P.S. gives advice the Minister wants to hear, instead of what he ought to hear.  I doubt it’s any different in large private companies.  All bureaucracies function the same way.

    • Mahhrat says:

      01:23pm | 24/11/11

      @Marley, that’s exactly the point.  And when that leader - our politicians - become as risk-avoidant and blame-retardant as they are, that filters back down.

      If our leadership won’t take a risk, then why should we?

      As much as I despise the action that was taken by Alan Joyce, at least he made a decision, acted, and will be judged upon that act.  How many politicians or CEOs can you say who had that gumption?

      I deplore the action, but I applaud that he’s living by his convictions.

    • Marrickvillain says:

      06:01am | 24/11/11

      Any working journalist can tell you it does not take much to be smarter than PR flunkies.

    • Erick says:

      06:37am | 24/11/11

      I’ve always been intrigues by that phrase, “working journalist”. What does it mean, exactly?

      We don’t say “working lawyer” or “working plumber”. Why is this expression unique to journalists?

    • Nathan says:

      06:44am | 24/11/11

      Yeah well it would be nice if Journalists didn’t rely on twitter a source for many articles

    • Reg says:

      07:19am | 24/11/11

      “Working journalist” would indicate regular employment. Probably earning at least enough to not require other employment.

      Since a lot are freelance without current jobs (but still refer to themselves as journalists as opposed to unemployed) they use it to distinguish themselves.

      Anyone can call themselves a journalist, or a writer. Doesn’t mean they can make a living at it.

    • Erick says:

      07:34am | 24/11/11

      @Reg - That makes sense. It also means that, for a time, I too was a “working journalist”!

    • Static says:

      06:14am | 24/11/11

      I think theyre on a similar level to consultants

    • IC-1101 says:

      07:11am | 24/11/11

      It doesn’t take much to be smarter than a “PR flunkie”, who are often hired based on their socialite skills and appearance, as opposed to their acknowledge knowledge of a particular industry.  This entire social media campaign is the complete opposite of “good PR”.  A campaign about “Qantas Luxury” while people strike for better conditions and more pay?  You’ve got to be kidding?

      Also, for anyone yet to jump on the Twitter bandwagon, a few tips:

      1. Don’t disagree with someone of the left.  They will ridicule you, RT (retween you) and degrade you, just like a real humanist…

      2. Don’t attempt to counter someone of the left.  Their friends will get involved, and you’ll be embroiled in a 2-sentence debate-off about financial equality. 

      3. Don’t even try to be funny, because you might risk being offensive.  Being offensive on Twitter is a big no-no: they will pounce like hyenas.

      4. Don’t actually communicate on Twitter: everything you say is probably offensive.

    • jay-ded says:

      08:06am | 24/11/11

      So what you’re really saying is anyone yet to jump on the Twitter bandwagon shouldn’t?  Makes sense.

    • Nathan says:

      08:26am | 24/11/11

      “Also, for anyone yet to jump on the Twitter bandwagon, a few tips:”
      Pretty easy to swap left for the word right here as well. Seen both sides do the same thing day in day out

    • Merry Christmess says:

      07:54am | 24/11/11

      All I want for Xmess is to know that Alan Joyce is on a plane to Blarneyi Land and won’t be coming back.

    • subotic says:

      08:15am | 24/11/11

      @Twitter #likeigiveamonkeysleftnutabouttwitter

      Been about a year and half since I de-social networked myself, and let me tall ya, I ain’t missed nothing yet….

    • Kebabpete says:

      08:33am | 24/11/11

      I’d like to know how many of the 1000’s of negative comments for Qantas were from people who’ve actually been affected by this dispute and how many were from people jumping on the slagging bandwagon.

      I personally know of 5 people who slagged Qantas off on twitter via the #qantasluxury tag for a joke, and not one has flown in the last 2 years or has any intention to in the next year.

      Everyone is a hero when they don’t have to say it in person.

    • Super D says:

      09:03am | 24/11/11

      Twitter is like a big in joke.  It really does have absolutely no relevance outside of hipster, IT and media circles.  I mean “look what someone tweeted about Qantas” I mean really so bloody what.  The mistake that corporates make is to engage with social media at all.  It gives it a substance that it doesn’t merit and will always be biased to the negative.  Outside of the PR flunkies who retweets positive corporate message?  No one unless they think there is a payoff in it for them, a witty negative remark forwarded lets the retweeter bask in the glory of the original witticism.

    • The Badger says:

      09:54am | 24/11/11

      Not surprised you don’t get it Super D.
      You live in the past with the rest of your conservative mates.

      Let me give you an example.

      I am a researcher at the University of West Australia. I am doing research into a new drug to combat the flu, a virus that tends to mutate into strains resistant to anti-influenza drugs.
      Twitter allows me to follow my colleagues around the world for developments that will assist my research. It allows me to ask a question of experts and receive a reply from fellow researchers around the world in real time.

      Bet you don’t get the NBN either.

    • TimB says:

      04:57pm | 24/11/11

      You know what does an even better job of that Badger?

      Email.

      What kind of quality research can you expect from correspondence bursts of 140 characters?

      Awful.

      Even worse problems occur if the feeds are public. Discussions on flu virus research, right out there on the internet? Freaking genius.

    • The Badger says:

      06:48pm | 24/11/11

      *sigh*

      You obviously don’t get it either timmie.

      sad very sad.
      back to the bucket of KFC, your greasy games controllerand your sad sad reality.

    • JR says:

      09:33am | 24/11/11

      I gave Qantas hell on Twitter. They cost me money on my last holiday by delaying a flight by more than 12 hours, leading to missed connections and unused hotel rooms. Stuff em.

    • Dieter Moeckel says:

      10:02am | 24/11/11

      I’m amazed that so many professional whiners and leftists can use the available social networks instead of working!
      On the QANTAS issue - Australian companies should employ Australian labour at Australian award rates.
      What’s wrong here is that from the day a workplace agreement is signed labour is already behind and by the time a three year agreement is finished labour is the accumulated CPI behind. Then the bargaining starts and labour goes further behind in more accumulated CPI. Meanwhile management on 5 and 6 figure remuneration packages change from Pol Roger to Moet for breakfast.
      I predicted new Unionism and industrial and social upheaval some time ago and it has started in the Occupy ... movement. Th Arab Spring and the Occupy ... movement is a world reaction to fat corporate pigs using police to enforce labour impoverishment and virtual slavery.
      To go off-shore for lower wages is to enrich QANTAS by enslaving others to low wages and poverty.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      10:22am | 24/11/11

      I can’t say I have all the answers on social media strategy – but I don’t think not engaging at all is the right move. Tempting as it might have been for Qantas to steer completely clear of the twittersphere (every line ends in rhyme) – they would then have be called cold and uncaring – which seems to be a pretty toxic association for a brand these days.

      The problem was not that they re-engaged their customers – it was how. Talking about luxury when they should have come out in sackcloth and ashes.

      When I think about it – its doesn’t seem to be so much a strategy problem – the problem runs far deeper. Qantas, I believe – genuinely has contempt for its customers. You wouldn’t inconvenience (seems like too a gentle a word doesn’t it?) 60,000 customers if you had even a tiny bit a respect for them. You wouldn’t think a bribe of pyjamas would be enough if you thought your customers had any intelligence or integrity. Quite clearly – they genuinely think their customers are people deserving of despicable behaviour. That’s a bigger problem than social media strategy.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@nigelmcbain I don't see the nexus between gay marriage and gay sex education in schools. ACL does. Health issues should be taught whatever

Daniel Piotrowski

@jennijenni a few companies are known to do that - ask for story ideas from job applicants so they can steal them later

Malcolm Farr

: Bruce Springsteen: "I get roughed up crowdsurfing… people try to pull chunks out of me" http://t.co/jiHqt8agt9” it was him, @patricklion

Daniel Piotrowski

Ray Hadley fires back at Carlton. Great @candacesutton1 get: http://t.co/7fQzk4Xixh

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter